Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With Contact Force–Sensing Catheter

Pulsed Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Results of ADVANTAGE AF

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has gained prominence for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to treat atrial fibrillation, but there are limited outcome data on PFA to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the safety and efficacy of PVI + posterior wall ablation (PWA) with PFA in PerAF.

METHODS

ADVANTAGE AF (A Prospective Single Arm Open Label Study of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System in Subjects with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter pivotal investigational device exemption study of PerAF patients undergoing PVI+PWA with the pentaspline PFA catheter. One-year follow-up included 24-hour Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months and twice monthly and symptomatic transtelephonic monitoring. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of predefined adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint included acute success and postblanking 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (>30 seconds), redo ablation, cardioversion, or antiarrhythmic drug escalation. Endpoint analysis used Kaplan-Meier methodology with 97.5% 1-sided confidence limits compared with a 12% safety and 40% effectiveness goals, with 85% power.

RESULTS

PFA in 339 patients (260 treatment and 79 roll-in) resulted in 99.7% success for both PVI and PWA. The primary safety endpoint was 2.3% (5.1% upper confidence limit), including 1 with pericarditis, 1 with myocardial infarction, and 4 with pulmonary edema; no tamponade, stroke, pulmonary vein stenosis, or esophageal fistula occurred. Primary effectiveness was 63.5% (57.3% lower confidence limit) at 1 year, with 8.5% patients having a single, isolated atrial fibrillation recurrence. Freedom from symptomatic atrial fibrillation was 85.3%; efficacy varied by operator experience.

CONCLUSIONS

ADVANTAGE AF, the first large prospective study of PFA to treat PerAF using a strategy of PVI and posterior wall isolation, revealed favorable safety and effectiveness outcomes. (A Prospective Single Arm Open Label Study of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System in Subjects with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation [ADVANTAGE AF]; NCT05443594).

Vagal AF induction test (VAFIT): a new endpoint for optimizing atrial fibrillation ablation through cardioneuroablation

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there is no reliable endpoint for the conclusion of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Atrial burst pacing and/or isoproterenol challenge are poor diagnostic tools. A newly proposed vagal AF induction test (VAFIT) uses effective atrial refractory period measurement, simultaneously with extra-cardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) to study AF inducibility pre- and post-ablation. This is a prospective study in patients submitted to radiofrequency catheter pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus cardioneuroablation (CNA) evaluating the VAFIT result before and at the end of the procedure with AF recurrence.

METHODS

Prospective study of 142 patients, 57.5 (48.9-70.2) years old, 71% males, with symptomatic AF (79.6% paroxysmal/20.4% persistent), left atrium diameter of 38.0 (35.0-41.2) mm, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 63.0 (62.0-68.2). VAFIT was considered positive or negative depending on whether AF induction occurred. It was performed at baseline and after PVI + CNA, with a single atrial extra stimulus during ECVS (5 s/50 Hz/1 V/kg up to 70 V/pulse width = 50 µs). Patients were followed for a median of 15.0 (7.0-20.0) months. The association of VAFIT-positive status at the end of the procedure with AF recurrence was investigated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Pre-ablation VAFIT was positive in all cases and became negative in 62.9% of patients. AF recurrence: 18.7% in VAFIT-positive and 5.6% in VAFIT-negative patients (p = 0.012). VAFIT-positivity was associated with AF recurrence (HR 4.56 (1.37-15.23, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

A VAFIT-positive status following PVI + CNA was strongly and independently associated with AF recurrence. VAFIT negative status reduced 4.5 times the post-ablation AF recurrence. It remains to be investigated in randomized studies whether achieving VAFIT-negativity at the end of the procedure, as demonstrated in this study, would lead to better clinical outcomes.

Deep neuromuscular blockade during radiofrequency catheter ablation under general anesthesia reduces the prevalence of atrial fibrillation recurrence when compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proper anesthesia management is required to maintain immobilization and stable breathing of the patient to improve catheter contact and stability during catheter ablation for PVI. However, it remains unclear whether the depth of neuromuscular blockade affects the results of RFCA under general anesthesia.

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to either the moderate neuromuscular blockade group (Group M, train-of-four 1 to 2) or the deep neuromuscular blockade group (Group D, posttetanic count 1-2). The primary outcome was the 12-month AF recurrence rate using confirmed electrocardiographic diagnosis after the ablation procedure at two different neuromuscular blockade depths.

RESULTS

Total 94 patients (47 in each group) were included in the analysis. Recurrence of AF during the A 12-month follow-up was 12 (25%) in group D and 22 (46%) in group M. The AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in group M (p =  0.03). The relative risk (RR) for the risk of 12-month AF recurrence was 0.545 in group D. AF symptom recurrence was observed during the A 12-month follow-up in 12 (25%) and 26 (54%) patients in groups D and M, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade, deep neuromuscular blockade while performing RFCA under general anesthesia reduced 12-month AF recurrence rate. Deep neuromuscular blockade under general anesthesia is thought to increase the success rate by providing a stable surgical environment during the RFCA procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials of Korea KCT 0003371.

Linear Ablation Using a Contact Force-Sensing Catheter in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Background/Objectives: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact force (CF)-sensing technology has improved long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. This prospective randomized study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CF-sensing technology for additional left atrial (LA) linear ablation of persistent AF (PerAF). Methods: After PVI, anteromitral (AM) line and roof line ablation were performed using a CF-sensing catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CF-sensing (CFS) group or the CF-blind control (Blind) group. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. LA late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) MRI was conducted at baseline and 1-year follow-up for long-term lesion evaluation. Results: A total of 62 patients with drug-refractory PerAF were enrolled (mean age: 58 ± 10 years; 77% male). The success rates of AM and roof line block were 97% and 100% in the CFS group (n = 33) and 93% and 90% in the Blind group (n = 29). The time to achieve block was reduced in the CFS group (AM: 36 ± 22 vs. 48 ± 28 min, p = 0.068; roof: 19 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 15 min, p = 0.031). The maximum CF for safety endpoints was significantly lower in the CFS group (AM: 42 vs. 69 g, p < 0.001; roof: 33 vs. 49 g, p = 0.003). Full linear LA-LGE formation on 1-year MRI did not differ significantly between the groups (AM: 17 vs. 36%; roof; 29 vs. 24%, both p = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after ablation procedures were 63.6% in the CFS group and 58.6% in the Blind group (log-rank p = 0.837). Conclusions: In patients with PerAF, additional LA linear ablation following PVI using CF-sensing technology improved procedural safety and reduced the time needed to achieve conduction block. However, it did not significantly influence clinical outcomes or the formation of permanent full linear lesions.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: indications and future perspective

Recent advances in techniques, technologies and proven superiority over anti-arrhythmic drugs have made catheter ablation the cornerstone of management for atrial fibrillation (AF), which has shown a steady increase in prevalence in the ageing population worldwide. The aim of therapeutic interventions is to achieve stable sinus rhythm that would improve the quality of life and reduce the risk of AF-associated complications. Pulmonary veins (PVs) were first described as the source of initiation of ectopic triggers driving AF, which led to the establishment of PV isolation (PVI) as the most widely practiced procedure to treat AF. Antral PVI is still recognized as the stand-alone ablation strategy for newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF (PAF). However, in non-PAF patients, PVI seems to be inadequate and several adjunctive strategies, including ablation of left atrial posterior wall and non-PV triggers, AF mapping and ablation of rotors and drivers, ethanol infusion of vein of Marshall and renal denervation, etc. have been reported with mixed results. Recent trials have also documented the benefits of early rhythm control in preventing cardiovascular events in addition to slowing the progression of PAF to more persistent forms. Similarly, very late relapse of the arrhythmia after successful PVI has drawn attention to the critical role of non-PV triggers and highlighted their relevance as potential ablation targets during repeat procedures. Ablation technology is also under constant evolution with the introduction of non-thermal energy sources and new tools to create durable lesions. This review summarizes the indications, advancements, and future perspective of AF ablation.

Anesthetic Techniques for Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Review

Atrial fibrillation, the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, has witnessed significant advancements in treatment modalities, transitioning from invasive procedures like the maze procedure to minimally invasive catheter ablation techniques. This review focuses on recent improvements in anesthetic approaches that enhance outcomes in catheter atrial fibrillation ablation. We highlight the efficacy of contact force sensing catheters with steerable introducer sheaths, which outperform traditional catheters by ensuring more effective contact time and lesion formation. Comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, we find that general anesthesia provides superior catheter stability due to reduced respiratory variability, resulting in more effective lesion formation, and reduced pulmonary vein reconnection. The use of high-frequency jet ventilation under general anesthesia, delivering low tidal volumes, effectively minimizes left atrial movement, decreasing catheter displacement and procedure time, and reducing recurrence in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. An alternative, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation using conventional ventilators, also shows improved catheter stability and lesion durability compared to traditional ventilation methods. However, a detailed comparative study of high-frequency jet ventilation, high-frequency low tidal volume ventilation, and conventional mechanical ventilation in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is lacking. This review emphasizes the need for such studies to identify optimal anesthetic techniques, potentially enhancing patient outcomes in atrial fibrillation treatment. Our findings suggest that careful selection of anesthetic methods, including ventilation strategies, plays a crucial role in the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, warranting further research for evidence-based practice.

High-Power Short-Duration Posterior Wall Isolation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using the New TactiFlex™ Ablation Catheter

BACKGROUND

The TactiFlex™ ablation catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN, USA), is an open-irrigation radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter with flexible tip technology. This catheter delivers high-power short-duration (HPSD) RF ablations and has been adopted for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. HPSD is well-established not only in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) but also when targeting extra-pulmonary vein (PV) targets. This study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of PVI plus posterior wall isolation (PWI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF) using HPSD and the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent the ablation of Pe-AF in our centre between February 2023 and February 2024 were prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PVI plus PWI using TactiFlex™ and the HPSD strategy. The RF parameters were 50 W on all the PV segments and the roof, and within the posterior wall (PW). Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and the high-density multipolar Advisor HD Grid, Sensor Enabled™ mapping catheter. We compared the procedural data using HPSD with TactiFlex™ (n = 52) vs. a historical cohort of patients who underwent PVI plus PWI using HPSD settings and the TactiCath ablation catheter (n = 84).

RESULTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients were included in the study. PVI and PWI were achieved in all patients in the TactiFlex™ group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 97.9% of PVs (n = 195/199). PWI was obtained in all cases by delivering extensive RF lesions within the PW. There were no significant differences compared to the TactiCath group: first-pass PVI was achieved in 96.3% of PVs (n = 319/331). Adenosine administration revealed PV reconnection in 5.7% of patients, and two reconnections of the PW were documented. Procedure and RF time were significantly shorter in the TactiFlex™ group compared to the TactiCath group, 73.1 ± 12.6 vs. 98.5 ± 16.3 min, and 11.3 ± 1.5 vs. 23.5 ± 3.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No intraprocedural and periprocedural complications related to the ablation catheter were observed. Patients had an implantable loop recorder before discharge. At the 6-month follow-up, 76.8% of patients remained free from atrial arrhythmia, with no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HPSD PVI plus PWI using the TactiFlex™ ablation catheter is effective and safe. Compared to a control group, the use of TactiFlex™ to perform HPSD PVI plus PWI is associated with a similar effectiveness but with a significantly shorter procedural and RF time.

Dual-energy lattice-tip ablation system for persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial

Clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are suboptimal due, in part, to challenges in achieving durable lesions. Although focal point-by-point ablation allows for the creation of any required lesion set, this strategy necessitates the generation of contiguous lesions without gaps. A large-tip catheter, capable of creating wide-footprint ablation lesions, may increase ablation effectiveness and efficiency. In a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial, 420 patients with persistent AF underwent ablation using a large-tip catheter with dual pulsed field and radiofrequency energies versus ablation using a conventional radiofrequency ablation system. The primary composite effectiveness endpoint was evaluated through 1 year and included freedom from acute procedural failure and repeat ablation at any time, plus arrhythmia recurrence, drug initiation or escalation or cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from a composite of serious procedure-related or device-related adverse events. The primary effectiveness endpoint was observed for 73.8% and 65.8% of patients in the investigational and control arms, respectively (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). Major procedural or device-related complications occurred in three patients in the investigational arm and in two patients in the control arm (P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). In a secondary analysis, procedural times were shorter in the investigational arm as compared to the control arm (P < 0.0001). These results demonstrate non-inferior safety and effectiveness of the dual-energy catheter for the treatment of persistent AF. Future large-scale studies are needed to gather real-world evidence on the impact of the focal dual-energy lattice catheter on the broader population of patients with AF. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05120193 .

Dual energy for pulmonary vein isolation using dual-energy focal ablation technology integrated with a three-dimensional mapping system: SmartfIRE 3-month results

AIMS

Contact force (CF)-sensing radiofrequency (RF) catheters with an ablation index have shown reproducible outcomes for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in large multicentre studies. A dual-energy (DE) focal CF catheter to deliver RF and unipolar/biphasic pulsed field ablation (PFA), integrated with a three-dimensional (3D) mapping system, can provide operators with additional flexibility. The SmartfIRE study assessed the safety and efficacy of this novel technology for the treatment of drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Results at 3 months post-ablation are presented here.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed using a DE focal, irrigated CF-sensing catheter with the recommendation of PFA at posterior/inferior and RF ablation at the anterior/ridge/carina segments. Irrespective of energy, a tag size of 3 mm; an inter-tag distance ≤6 mm; a target index of 550 for anterior, roof, ridge, and carina; and a target index of 400 for posterior and inferior were recommended. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was permitted in patients with documented typical atrial flutter. The primary effectiveness endpoint was acute procedural success. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of primary adverse events (PAEs) within 7 days of the procedure. A prespecified patient subset underwent oesophageal endoscopy (EE; 72 h post-procedure), neurological assessment (NA; pre-procedure and discharge), and cardiac computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) imaging (pre-procedure and 3 months post-procedure) for additional safety evaluation, and a mandatory remapping procedure (Day 75 ± 15) for PVI durability assessment. Of 149 patients enrolled between February and June 2023, 140 had the study catheter inserted (safety analysis set) and 137 had ablation energy delivered (per-protocol analysis set). The median (Q1/Q3) total procedure and fluoroscopy times were 108.0 (91.0/126.0) and 4.2 (2.3/7.7) min (n = 137). The acute procedural success rate was 100%. First-pass isolation was achieved in 89.1% of patients and 96.8% of veins. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablations were successfully performed in 12 patients [pulsed field (PF) only: 6, RF only: 5, and RF/PF: 1]. The PAE rate was 4.4% [6/137 patients; 2 pulmonary vein (PV) stenoses, 2 cardiac tamponades/perforations, 1 stroke, and 1 pericarditis]. No coronary artery spasm was reported. No oesophageal lesion was seen in the EE subset (0/31, 0%). In the NA subset (n = 30), microemboli lesions were identified in 2 patients (2/30, 6.7%), both of which were resolved at follow-up; only 1 was symptomatic (silent cerebral lesion, 3.3%). In the CT/MRA subset (n = 30), severe PV narrowing (of >70%) was detected in 2 patients (2/30, 6.7%; vein level 2/128, 1.6%), of whom 1 underwent dilatation and stenting and 1 was asymptomatic; both were associated with high index values and a small inter-tag distance. In the PV durability subset (n = 30), 100/115 treated PVs (87%) were durably isolated and 18/30 patients (60.0%) had all PVs durably isolated.

CONCLUSION

A DE focal CF catheter with 3D mapping integration showed a 100% acute success rate with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of paroxysmal AF. Prespecified 3-month remapping showed notable PVI durability.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05752487.

Updates in the management of atrial fibrillation: Emerging therapies and treatment

OBJECTIVE

The most common and clinically important cardiac arrhythmia is atrial fibrillation (AF), which has a large negative impact on public health due to higher fatalities, morbidity, and healthcare expenditure rates. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and outcomes of various treatment approaches and interventions for AF.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHOD

The most pertinent published research (original papers and reviews) in the scientific literature were searched for and critically assessed using the online, internationally indexed databases PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Reviews. These studies are summarised in this review. Keywords like "Atrial Fibrillation", "emerging therapies", "treatment", "catheter ablation", and "atrial appendage" were used to search the papers. The papers were researched and examined to be relevant to the topic.

CONCLUSION

A lot of work has gone into enhancing AF management to deal with this expanding public health concern. Significant developments and advances in the treatment of AF during the past few years have aided clinicians in giving AF patients better care. The most recent treatments for AF include medication, catheter ablation, cryo-balloon ablation, and left atrial appendage closure.

Radiofrequency lesion formation prediction with contact force versus local impedance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Safe and effective radiofrequency (RF) myocardial ablation requires real-time monitoring of lesion formation. Here, we review conventional and novel approaches proposed to guide titration of RF energy application.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional monitoring modalities, such as ablation electrode temperature, generator impedance, and tissue electrophysiological properties have been of limited value in predicting efficacy and safety of ablation. Therefore, several input-driven indices have been proposed to improve the quality and durability of RF ablation lesion while maintaining safety. These metrics predominantly incorporate RF power output, duration of RF application, and firmness and stability of electrode-tissue contact. More recently, novel catheters have enabled measuring local impedance at the catheter-tissue interface, which has been found valuable for real-time monitoring of RF lesion formation.

SUMMARY

It is likely that using the combination of multiple metrics would be required to improve the quality and safety of RF lesions, but further investigation is still required.

Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation, which delivers microsecond high-voltage electrical fields, may limit damage to tissues outside the myocardium. The efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation as compared with conventional thermal ablation are not known.

METHODS

In this randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we assigned patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a 1:1 ratio to undergo pulsed field ablation or conventional radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation. The primary safety end point included acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients were assigned to undergo pulsed field ablation, and 302 were assigned to undergo thermal ablation. At 1 year, the primary efficacy end point was met (i.e., no events occurred) in 204 patients (estimated probability, 73.3%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 194 patients (estimated probability, 71.3%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -5.2 to 9.2; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999). Primary safety end-point events occurred in 6 patients (estimated incidence, 2.1%) who underwent pulsed field ablation and 4 patients (estimated incidence, 1.5%) who underwent thermal ablation (between-group difference, 0.6 percentage points; 95% Bayesian credible interval, -1.5 to 2.8; posterior probability of noninferiority, >0.999).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation receiving a catheter-based therapy, pulsed field ablation was noninferior to conventional thermal ablation with respect to freedom from a composite of initial procedural failure, documented atrial tachyarrhythmia after a 3-month blanking period, antiarrhythmic drug use, cardioversion, or repeat ablation and with respect to device- and procedure-related serious adverse events at 1 year. (Funded by Farapulse-Boston Scientific; ADVENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04612244.).

Selection of patients for hybrid ablation procedure

Catheter ablation for treatment of symptomatic non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation remains challenging. Clinical failure and need for continued medical therapy or repeat ablation is common, especially in more advanced forms of atrial fibrillation. Hybrid ablation has emerged as a more effective and safe therapy than endocardial-only ablation particularly for longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation as demonstrated by the randomized controlled CONVERGE trial. Hybrid ablation requires collaboration of electrophysiologists and cardiac surgeons to develop specific workflows. This review describes the Hybrid Convergent approach in the context of available ablation options and offers guidance for workflow development and patient selection.

High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background: High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation has been adopted to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Although the role of HPSD is well-established in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), fewer data have assessed the impact of HPSD when addressing extra-pulmonary veins (PVs) targets. Therefore, this study aims to determine the safety, effectiveness, and acute outcomes of HPSD lesion index (LSI)-guided posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to PVI as an initial strategy in persistent atrial fibrillation (Pe-AF). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent ablation of Pe-AF in our center between August 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients' ablation strategy was PVI plus PWI using HPSD LSI-guided isolation. RF parameters included 50 W targeting LSI values of ≥5 on the anterior part of the PVs and anterior roofline and ≥4 for the posterior PVs aspect, bottom line, and within the posterior wall (PW). We compared the LSI values with and without acute conduction gaps after the initial first-pass PWI. Left atrial mapping was performed with the EnSite X mapping system and a high-density multipolar Grid-shaped mapping catheter. We compared the procedural characteristics using HPSD (n = 35) vs. a control group (n = 46). Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included in the study. PWI on top of PVI was achieved in all cases in the HPSD group. First-pass PVI was achieved in 93.3% of PVs (n = 126/135). First-pass roofline block was obtained in most patients (n = 31, 88.5%), while first-pass block of the bottom line was only achieved in 51.4% (n = 18). There were no significant differences compared to the control group; first-pass PVI was achieved in 94.9% of PVs (n = 169/178), first-pass roofline block in 89.1%, and bottom-line in 45.6% of patients. To achieve complete PWI with HPSD, scattered RF applications within the PW were necessary. No electrical reconnection of the PW was found after adenosine administration and the waiting period. The procedure and RF times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the control group, with values of 116.2 ± 10.9 vs. 144.5 ± 11.3 min, and 19.8 ± 3.6 vs. 26.3 ± 6.4 min, respectively, p < 0.001. Fluoroscopy time was comparable between both groups. No procedural complications were observed. At the 12-month follow-up, 71.4% of patients remained free from AF, with no differences between the groups. Conclusions: HPSD LSI-guided PWI on top of PVI seems effective and safe. Compared to a control group, HPSD is associated with similar rates of first-pass PWI and PVI but with a shorter procedural and RF time.

Acute and mid-term outcomes of ablation for atrial fibrillation with VISITAG SURPOINT: the Japan MIYABI registry

AIMS

The effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) guided by VISITAG SURPOINT (VS) has been demonstrated in Western populations. However, data for Asian populations are limited. VS settings may differ for Asians, given their smaller body size. This study aimed to describe outcomes of radiofrequency atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation guided by VS in a large Asian population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The prospective, observational, multicentre MIYABI registry collected real-world data from patients undergoing VS-guided AF ablation using ThermoCool SmartTouch and ThermoCool SmartTouch SF catheters from 50 Japanese centres. All patients had paroxysmal AF or persistent AF for <6 months. Primary adverse events (PAEs) were evaluated for safety. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with PVI at the end of the procedure. Mid-term effectiveness (up to 12 months) was evaluated by freedom from documented atrial arrhythmias. Of the 1011 patients enrolled, 1002 completed AF ablation. The mean number of VS values per procedure was 428.8 on the anterior wall and 400.4 on the posterior wall. Nine patients (0.9%) experienced PAEs. Upon procedure completion, 99.7% of patients had PVI. Twelve-month freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was 88.5%; 5.7% of patients were re-ablated. At repeat ablation, 54% of RSPV, 73% of RIPV, 70% of LSPV, and 86% of LIPV evaluated remained durably isolated.

CONCLUSION

Despite lower anterior wall VS values compared with the CLOSE protocol (≥550), the present study demonstrated comparable efficacy outcomes, indicating that a VS of ≥550 for the anterior wall may not be necessary for Asian patients.

Efficacy and safety of hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation versus endocardial ablation in patients with persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomised, controlled trial

Background

Endocardial catheter ablation (CA) has limited long-term benefit for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF/LSPAF). We hypothesized hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation (HA) would have superior effectiveness compared to CA, including repeat (rCA), in PersAF/LSPAF.

Methods

CEASE-AF (NCT02695277) is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial. Nine hospitals in Poland, Czech Republic, Germany, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands enrolled eligible participants with symptomatic, drug refractory PersAF and left atrial diameter (LAD) > 4.0 cm or LSPAF. Randomization was 2:1 to HA or CA by an independent statistician and stratified by site. Treatment assignments were masked to the core rhythm monitoring laboratory. For HA, pulmonary veins (PV) and left posterior atrial wall were isolated with thoracoscopic epicardial ablation including left atrial appendage exclusion. Endocardial touch-up ablation was performed 91-180 days post-index procedure. For CA, endocardial PV isolation and optional substrate ablation were performed. rCA was permitted between days 91-180. Primary effectiveness was freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia >30-s through 12-months absent class I/III anti-arrhythmic drugs except those not exceeding previously failed doses. It was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population who had the index procedure and follow-up data. Major complications were assessed in the ITT population who had the index procedure. Thirty-six month follow-up continues.

Findings

Enrollment began November 20, 2015 and ended May 22, 2020. In 154 ITT patients (102 HA; 52 CA), 75% were male, mean age was 60.7 ± 7.9 years, mean LAD was 4.7 ± 0.4 cm, and 81% had PersAF. Primary effectiveness was 71.6% (68/95) in HA versus 39.2% (20/51) in CA (absolute benefit increase: 32.4% [95% CI 14.3%-48.0%], p < 0.001). Major complications through 30-days after index procedures plus 30-days after second stage/rCA were similar (HA: 7.8% [8/102] versus CA: 5.8% [3/52], p = 0.75).

Interpretation

HA had superior effectiveness compared to CA/rCA in PersAF/LSPAF without significant procedural risk increase.

Funding

AtriCure, Inc.

Personalized pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by left atrial wall thickness for persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation proved to be effective for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). We sought to investigate the results of a personalized approach aimed at adapting the ablation index (AI) to the local left atrial wall thickness (LAWT) in a cohort of consecutive patients with PeAF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients referred for PeAF first ablation were prospectively enrolled. The LAWT three-dimensional maps were obtained from pre-procedure multidetector computed tomography and integrated into the navigation system. Ablation index was titrated according to the local LAWT, and the ablation line was personalized to avoid the thickest regions while encircling the PV antrum. A total of 121 patients (69.4% male, age 64.5 ± 9.5 years) were included. Procedure time was 57 min (IQR 50-67), fluoroscopy time was 43 s (IQR 20-71), and radiofrequency (RF) time was 16.5 min (IQR 14.3-18.4). The median AI tailored to the local LAWT was 387 (IQR 360-410) for the anterior wall and 335 (IQR 300-375) for the posterior wall. First-pass PV antrum isolation was obtained in 103 (85%) of the right PVs and 103 (85%) of the left PVs. Median LAWT values were higher for PVs without first-pass isolation as compared to the whole cohort (P = 0.02 for left PVs and P = 0.03 for right PVs). Recurrence-free survival was 79% at 12 month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, LAWT-guided PV antrum isolation for PeAF was effective and efficient, requiring low procedure, fluoroscopy, and RF time. A randomized trial comparing the LAWT-guided ablation with the standard of practice is in progress (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05396534).

Treatment of pathophysiologic propagation outside of the pulmonary veins in retreatment of atrial fibrillation patients: RECOVER AF study

AIMS

RECOVER AF evaluated the performance of whole-chamber non-contact charge-density mapping to guide the ablation of non-pulmonary vein (PV) targets in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients following either a first or second failed procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

RECOVER AF was a prospective, non-randomized trial that enrolled patients scheduled for a first or second ablation retreatment for recurrent AF. The PVs were assessed and re-isolated if necessary. The AF maps were used to guide the ablation of non-PV targets through elimination of pathologic conduction patterns (PCPs). Primary endpoint was freedom from AF on or off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 12 months. Patients undergoing retreatment with the AcQMap System (n = 103) were 76% AF-free at 12 months [67% after single procedure (SP)] on or off AADs (80% free from AF on AADs). Patients who had only received a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) prior to study treatment of non-PV targets with the AcQMap System were 91% AF-free at 12 months (83% SP). No major adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Non-contact mapping can be used to target and guide the ablation of PCPs beyond the PVs in persistent AF patients returning for a first or second retreatment with 76% freedom from AF at 12 months. The AF freedom was particularly high, 91% (43/47), for patients enrolled having only a prior de novo PVI, and freedom from all atrial arrhythmias for this cohort was 74% (35/47). These early results are encouraging and suggest that guiding individualized targeted ablation of PCPs may therefore be advantageous to target at the earliest opportunity in patients with persistent AF.

How an innovative catheter with temperature control and very high-power, short-duration ablation changed our approach to the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation

Ablation targets of persistent atrial fibrillation remain poorly understood nowadays: due to structural alterations of the left atrium, isolation of the pulmonary veins alone has proved ineffective. New ablation targets such as the posterior wall, coronary sinus, and left atrial appendage were then sought. A new catheter (QDOT Micro™) has recently been released, which has the potential to increase the safety and efficacy of the procedure: it is connected to a new radiofrequency generator that allows for temperature-controlled ablation by reducing power and increasing irrigation with the increase in tissue temperature and allows to deliver power up to 90 W for few seconds (very high-power short-duration).

Extensive Posterior Wall Isolation on Top of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guided by Ablation Index in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Background: Durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recommended for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but it has been demonstrated that it may not be enough to treat persistent AF (Pe-AF). Therefore, posterior wall isolation (PWI) is among the strategies adopted on top of PVI to treat Pe-AF patients. However, PWI using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions remains challenging, and few studies have evaluated the impact of the Ablation Index (AI) on the efficacy of PWI. Moreover, previous papers did not evaluate arrhythmia recurrences using continuous monitoring. Methods: This is a prospective, observational, single-center study on patients affected by Pe-AF undergoing treated PVI plus AI-guided PWI. Procedures were performed using the CARTO mapping system, SmartTouch SF ablation catheter, and PentaRay multipolar mapping catheter. The AI settings were 500–550 for the anterior PV aspect and roofline, while the settings were 450–500 for the posterior PV aspect, bottom line, and/or PW lesions. All patients received an implantable loop recorder (ILR). All patients underwent clinical evaluation in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. A standard 12-lead ECG was performed at each visit, and device data from the ILR were reviewed to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Results: Between January 2021 and December 2021, forty-one consecutive patients underwent PVI plus PWI guided by AI at our center and were prospectively enrolled in the study. PVI was achieved in all patients, first-pass roofline block was obtained in 82.9% of the patients, and first-pass block of the bottom line was achieved in 36.5% of the patients. In 39% of the patients, PWI was not performed with a “box-only” lesion set, but with scattered lesions across the PW to achieve PWI. AI on the anterior aspect of the left PVs was 528 ± 22, while on the posterior aspect of the left PVs, it was 474 ± 18; on the anterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 532 ± 27, while on the posterior aspect of the right PVs, it was 477 ± 16; on the PW, AI was 468 ± 19. No acute complications occurred at the end of the procedure. After the blanking period, 70.7% of the patients reported no arrhythmia recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions: In patients with Pe-AF undergoing catheter ablation, PWI guided by AI seems to be an effective and feasible strategy in addition to standard PVI.

Radiofrequency ablation using the second-generation temperature-controlled diamond tip system in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: results from FASTR-AF

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) technology development reflects the need to improve the effectiveness of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Recently, the DiamondTemp Ablation (DTA) RF generator software was updated with a more responsive power ramp.

METHODS

DIAMOND FASTR-AF was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial. This study sought to characterize the performance of the updated DTA system for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent AF (PAF and PsAF). The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence following a 90-day blanking period through 12 months, and the primary safety endpoint was a composite of serious adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 60 subjects (34 PAF and 26 PsAF) underwent CA at three centers. Patients were 71.7% male, (age 63.9 ± 10.2 years, with an AF diagnosis duration 3.1 ± 3.9 years and left atrial size 4.4 ± 0.8 cm). Pulmonary vein isolation-only ablation strategy was performed in 34 (56.7%) subjects. The procedural characteristics show a procedure time 90.8 ± 31.6 min, total RF time 14.7 ± 7.7 min, ablation duration 10.7 ± 3.6 s, and fluid infusion 284.7 ± 111.5 ml. The serious adverse event rate was 8.3% (5/60), 3 pulmonary edema and 2 extended hospitalizations. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence was achieved in 67.6% of subjects by 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The updated DTA system demonstrated long-term safety and effectiveness through 12 months of post-ablation follow-up for patients with atrial fibrillation. Additionally, procedures were demonstrated to be highly efficient with short procedure times and low levels of fluid infusion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Sponsored by Medtronic, Inc.; FASTR-AF ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03626649.

Development and Validation of a Postoperative Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) have a high risk of recurrence after catheter radiofrequency ablation. Nevertheless, no effective prognostic tools have been developed to identify these high-risk patients to date. This study sought to develop and validate a simple linear predictive model for predicting postoperative recurrence in patients with PsAF.

Methods: From June 2013 to June 2021, patients with PsAF admitted to our hospital were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective, observational study. The characteristics substantially associated with recurrence in patients with PsAF were screened through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the predictive significance of the nomogram model after nomogram development. Furthermore, to assess the clinical value of the nomogram, we performed calibration curve and decision curve analyses.

Results: A total of 209 patients were included in the study, 42 (20.10%) of whom were monitored up to 1 year for recurrent AF. The duration of AF episodes, left atrial diameter, BMI, CKMB, and alcohol consumption were found to be independent risk factors (P<0.05) and were integrated into the nomogram model development. The area under the curve was 0.895, the sensitivity was 93.3%, and the specificity was 71.4%, thus indicating the model’s excellent predictive ability. The C-index of the predictive nomogram model was 0.906. Calibration curve and decision curve analyses further revealed that the model had robust prediction and strong discrimination ability.

Conclusion: This simple, practical, and innovative nomogram can help clinicians in evaluation of the risk of PsAF recurrence after catheter ablation, thus facilitating preoperative evaluation, postoperative monitoring and ultimately the construction of more personalized therapeutic protocols.

Hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: A subanalysis of the CONVERGE Trial

Background

Favorable clinical outcomes are difficult to achieve in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) with catheter ablation (CA). The CONVERGE (Convergence of Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent Atrial FIbrillation) trial evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid convergent (HC) ablation vs endocardial CA.

Objective

The study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HC vs CA in the LSPAF subgroup from the CONVERGE trial.

Methods

The CONVERGE trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled 153 patients at 27 sites. A post hoc analysis was performed on LSPAF patients. The primary effectiveness was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off new or increased dose of previously failed or intolerant antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) through 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse event incidence through 30 days with HC. Key secondary effectiveness measures included (1) percent of patients achieving ≥90% AF burden reduction vs baseline and (2) AF freedom.

Results

Sixty-five patients (42.5% of total enrollment) had LSPAF; 38 in HC and 27 in CA. Primary effectiveness was 65.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.7%-80.9%) with HC vs 37.0% (95% CI 5.1%-52.4%) with CA (P = .022). Through 18 months, these rates were 60.5% (95% CI 50.0%-76.1%) with HC vs 25.9% (95% CI 9.4%-42.5%) with CA (P = .006). Secondary effectiveness rates were higher than CA with HC at 12 and 18 months. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias off AADs was 52.6% (95% CI 36.8%-68.5%) and 47.4% (95% CI 31.5%-63.2%) with HC at 12 and 18 months vs 25.9% (95% CI 9.4%-42.5%) and 22.2% (95% CI 6.5%-37.9%) with CA, respectively (12 months: P = .031; 18 months: P = .038). Three (7.9%) major adverse events occurred within 30 days of HC.

Conclusion

Post hoc analysis demonstrated effectiveness and acceptable safety of HC compared with CA in LSPAF.

Contact force catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the PERSIST-END study

INTRODUCTION

Use of a novel magnetic sensor enabled optical contact force ablation catheter has been established to be safe and effective for treatment of symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) but has yet to be demonstrated in the persistent AF (PersAF) population.

METHODS

PERSIST-END was a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, investigational study designed to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of TactiCath™ Ablation Catheter, Sensor Enabled™(SE) (TactiCath SE) for use in the treatment of subjects with documented PersAF refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I/III AAD. The ablation strategy included pulmonary vein isolation and additional targets at physician discretion. Follow-up through 15-months, including a 3-month blanking period and 3-month therapy consolidation period, was performed with cardiac event and Holter monitoring. Primary safety, primary effectiveness, clinical success, and quality of life (QOL) endpoints were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 224 subjects enrolled at 21 investigational sites in the United States and Australia, 223 underwent ablation with the investigational catheter. The primary safety event rate was 3.1% (seven events in seven subjects). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia recurrence at 15-months was 61.6% and clinical success at 15 months was 89.8%. Subject QOL significantly improved following ablation as assessed via AFEQT (31.6 point increase, p < .0001) and EQ-5D-5L (10.7 point increase, p < .0001) and was met with a 53% reduction in all cause cardiovascular healthcare utilization.

CONCLUSION

The sensor-enabled force-sensing catheter is safe and effective for the treatment of drug refractory recurrent symptomatic PersAF, reducing arrhythmia recurrence while improving QOL and healthcare utilization.

10-Year Outcomes of Patients With Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is commonly performed in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but because very long-term follow-up results of RFCA are limited, we investigated the 10-year RFCA outcomes of non-paroxysmal AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively enrolled 100 patients (89 men, mean age 53.5±8.4years) with drug-refractory symptomatic non-paroxysmal AF who underwent 3D electroanatomic-guided RFCA. Procedural characteristics at index procedures and clinical outcomes were investigated. In the index procedures, all patients had pulmonary vein isolation, 56 (56.0%), 48 (48.0%), and 32 (32.0%) underwent additional linear, complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and non-pulmonary vein (NPV) foci ablations, respectively. After 124.1±31.7 months, 16 (16%) patients remained in sinus rhythm after just 1 procedure (3 with antiarrhythmic drugs [AAD]) and after multiple (2.1±1.3) procedures in 53 (53.0%) patients (22 with AAD). Left atrial (LA) diameter (hazard ratio HR 1.061; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.020 to 1.103; P=0.003), presence of NPV triggers (HR 1.634; 95% CI 1.019 to 2.623; P=0.042) and undergoing CFAE ablation (HR 2.003; 95% CI 1.262 to 3.180; P=0.003) in the index procedure were independent predictors for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year outcomes of single RFCA in non-paroxysmal AF were unsatisfactory. Enlarged LA, presence of NPV triggers, and undergoing CFAE ablation in the index procedure independently predicted single-procedure recurrence. Multiple procedures are required to achieve adequate rhythm control.

Evolving Role of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Early and Effective Rhythm Control

Catheter Ablation (CA) is an effective therapeutic option in treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Importantly, recent data show that CA as a rhythm control strategy not only significantly reduces AF burden, but also substantially improves clinical hard endpoints. Since AF is a progressive disease, the time of Diagnosis-to-Intervention appears crucial. Recent evidence shows that earlier rhythm control is associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with early AF. Particularly, CA as an initial first line rhythm control strategy is associated with significant reduction of arrhythmia recurrence and rehospitalization in patients with paroxysmal AF. CA is shown to significantly lower the risk of progression from paroxysmal AF to persistent AF. When treating persistent AF, the overall clinical success after ablation remains unsatisfactory, however the ablation outcome in patients with "early" persistent AF appears better than those with "late" persistent AF. "Adjunctive" ablation on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), e.g., ablation of atrial low voltage area, left atrial posterior wall, vein of Marshall, left atrial appendage, etc., may further reduce arrhythmia recurrence in selected patient group. New ablation concepts or new ablation technologies have been developing to optimize therapeutic effects or safety profile and may ultimately improve the clinical outcome.

Safe and effective delivery of high-power, short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions with a flexible-tip ablation catheter

Background

High-power, short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may reduce ablation time. Concerns that catheter-mounted thermocouples (TCs) can underestimate tissue temperature, resulting in elevated risk of steam pop formation, potentially limit widespread adoption of HPSD ablation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of HPSD and low-power, long-duration (LPLD) RFA in the context of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

An open-irrigated ablation catheter with a contact force sensor and a flexible-tip electrode containing a TC at its distal end (TactiFlex^TM Ablation Catheter, Sensor Enabled^TM, Abbott) was used to isolate the left pulmonary veins (PVs) in 12 canines with HPSD RFA (50 W for 10 seconds) and LPLD RFA (30 W for a maximum of 60 seconds). PVI was assessed at 30 minutes and 28 ± 3 days postablation. Computed tomographic scans were performed to assess PV stenosis after RFA. Lesions were evaluated with histopathology.

Results

A total of 545 ablations were delivered: 252 with LPLD (0 steam pops) and 293 with HPSD RFA (2 steam pops) (P = .501). Ablation time required to achieve PVI was >3-fold shorter for HPSD than for LPLD RFA (P = .001). All 24 PVs were isolated 30 minutes after ablation, with 12/12 LPLD-ablated and 11/12 HPSD-ablated PVs still isolated at follow-up. Histopathology revealed transmural ablations for HPSD and LPLD RFA. No major adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

An investigational ablation catheter effectively delivered RFA lesions. Ablation time required to achieve PVI with HPSD with this catheter was >3-fold shorter than with LPLD RFA.

Asymptomatic left circumflex artery stenosis is associated with higher arrhythmia recurrence after persistent atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

The pathophysiology of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. While several studies have demonstrated an association between myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, the role of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) is still unknown. As a result, we aimed to assess the association between CAD obstruction and AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation in patients with no history of CAD.

Materials and methods

This observational retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent routine preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CCT) before persistent AF ablation between September 2015 and June 2018 in 5 European University Hospitals. Exclusion criteria were CAD or coronary revascularization previously known or during follow-up. Obstructive CAD was defined as luminal stenosis ≥ 50%.

Results

All in all, 496 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 10.0 years, 76.2% males) were included. CHA2DS2-VASc score was 0 or 1 in 225 (36.3%) patients. Obstructive CAD was present in 86 (17.4%) patients. During the follow-up (24 ± 19 months), 207 (41.7%) patients had AF recurrence. The recurrence rate was not different between patients with and without obstructive CAD (43.0% vs. 41.5%, respectively; P = 0.79). When considering the location of the stenosis, the recurrence rate was higher in the case of left circumflex obstruction: 56% vs. 32% at 2 years (log-rank P ≤ 0.01). After Cox multivariate analysis, circumflex artery obstruction (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.36-3.98; P < 0.01) was independently associated with AF recurrence.

Conclusion

Circumflex artery obstruction detected with CCT was independently associated with 2-fold increase in the risk of AF recurrence after persistent AF ablation. Further research is necessary to evaluate this pathophysiological relationship.

Safety and Effectiveness of a Catheter With Contact Force and 6-Hole Irrigation for Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Routine Clinical Practice

IMPORTANCE

The ThermoCool SmartTouch catheter (ablation catheter with contact force and 6-hole irrigation [CF-I6]) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and used in routine clinical practice for persistent AF ablation, although clinical outcomes for this indication are unknown. There is a need to understand whether data from routine clinical practice can be used to conduct regulatory-grade evaluations and support label expansions.

OBJECTIVE

To use health system data to compare the safety and effectiveness of the CF-I6 catheter for persistent AF ablation with the ThermoCool SmartTouch SurroundFlow catheter (ablation catheter with contact force and 56-hole irrigation [CF-I56]), which is approved by the FDA for this indication.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective, comparative-effectiveness cohort study included patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF at Mercy Health or Mayo Clinic from January 1, 2014, to April 30, 2021, with up to a 1-year follow-up using electronic health record data.

EXPOSURES

Use of the CF-I6 or CF-I56 catheter.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary safety outcome was a composite of death, thromboembolic events, and procedural complications within 7 to 90 days. The exploratory effectiveness outcome was a composite of AF-related hospitalization events after a 90-day blanking period. Propensity score weighting was used to balance baseline covariates. Risk differences were estimated between catheter groups and averaged across the 2 health care systems, testing for noninferiority of the CF-I6 vs the CF-I56 catheter with respect to the safety outcome using 2-sided 90% CIs.

RESULTS

Overall, 1450 patients (1034 [71.3%] male; 1397 [96.3%] White) underwent catheter ablation for persistent AF, including 949 at Mercy Health (186 CF-I6 and 763 CF-I56; mean [SD] age, 64.9 [9.2] years) and 501 at Mayo Clinic (337 CF-I6 and 164 CF-I56; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [9.5] years). A total of 798 (55.0%) had been treated with class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs before ablation. The safety outcome (CF-I6 - CF-I56) was similar at both Mercy Health (1.3%; 90% CI, -2.1% to 4.6%) and Mayo Clinic (-3.8%; 90% CI, -11.4% to 3.7%); the mean difference was noninferior, with a mean of 0.5% (90% CI, -2.6% to 3.5%; P < .001). The effectiveness was similar at 12 months between the 2 catheter groups (mean risk difference, -1.8%; 90% CI, -7.3% to 3.7%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, the CF-I6 catheter met the prespecified noninferiority safety criterion for persistent AF ablation compared with the CF-I56 catheter, and effectiveness was similar. This study demonstrates the ability of electronic health care system data to enable safety and effectiveness evaluations of medical devices.

A Chronicle of Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy: From Cox Maze to Convergent

The burden of AF is increasing in prevalence and healthcare resource usage in the UK and worldwide. It can result in impaired quality of life for affected patients, as well as increased risk of stroke, heart failure and mortality. A holistic, integrated approach to AF management is recommended, which may include a focus on reducing risk factors and on medical management with anticoagulation and anti-arrhythmic drugs. There are also various ablation strategies that may be considered when anti-arrhythmic drugs fail to alleviate symptoms and reduce AF burden. These ablation techniques range from standalone percutaneous endocardial catheter ablation to open surgical ablation procedures concomitant with cardiac surgery. More recently, hybrid ablation that combines aspects of both surgical and electrophysiologically targeted ablation has been described. This article reviews the evolution of ablation strategies, beginning with the origin of the Cox maze IV procedure and continuing to the recent hybrid convergent approach, and provides a summary of the associated outcomes.

Catheter ablation using advanced porous tip contact force–sensing radiofrequency catheter: Impact on health care utilization among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF); however, little is known about its impact on health care utilization for patients with PsAF. The ThermoCool SmartTouch SF (STSF) catheter (Biosense Webster) incorporates an advanced porous tip and contact force–sensing technology.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine health care utilization among patients with PsAF who underwent ablation with the STSF catheter.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database identified patients with PsAF undergoing CA with the STSF catheter in inpatient and outpatient settings. The proportion of patients experiencing AF-related inpatient admissions, outpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, electrical cardioversion, and a composite outcome in the 12 months pre- vs postablation were compared using the McNemar test. Subanalyses were performed on study outcomes by race/ethnicity.

Results

The final sample included 3077 patients (mean age 65.9 years; 31.7% female). Among patients with PsAF undergoing ablation with the STSF catheter, relative reductions in health care utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation included 55.3% in AF-related inpatient admissions (P <.0001), 38.9% in outpatient admissions (P <.0001), 52.4% in ED visits (P <.0001), and 61.2% in electrical cardioversions (P <.0001). Composite outcome utilization in the 12 months post- vs preablation declined by 40.2% (P <.0001) for the overall cohort, 40.0% for White patients (P <.0001), 52.2% for Black patients (P <.0001), and 50.1% for Asian patients (P = .032).

Conclusion

Significant improvements in health care utilization were observed among PsAF patients who underwent ablation using the STSF catheter. Improvements were particularly marked in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups.

Optimal Catheter Ablation Strategy for Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study

The optimal catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and heart failure (HF) remains uncertain. Between 2016 and 2020, 118 consecutive patients with PeAF and HF who underwent the CA procedure in two centers were retrospectively evaluated and divided into the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only and PVI + additional ablation groups. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, one month, and 12 months after the CA procedure. The HF symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvements were analyzed. Fifty-six patients underwent PVI only, and 62 patients received PVI with additional ablation. Compared with the baseline, a significant improvement in the LVEF and left atrial diameter postablation was observed in all patients. No significant HF improvement was detected in the PVI + additional ablation group than in the PVI-only group (74.2% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.736), but the procedure and ablation time were significantly longer (137.4 ± 7.5 vs. 123.1 ± 11.5 min, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change in TTE parameters and the number of rehospitalizations. For patients with PeAF and HF, CA appears to improve left ventricular function. Additional ablation does not improve outcomes and has a significantly longer procedure time. Trial registration number is as follows: ChiCTR2100053745 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx).

Clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation after technologic advances including contact force-guided and ablation index-guided ablation

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the influence of technological advances on ablation outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) (PeAF). Radiofrequency ablation for patients with AF has advanced, including contact force (CF)-sensing catheters and the ablation index (AI).

Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, we analyzed 173 patients with PeAF who underwent catheter ablation. We categorized them into three groups: AF ablation without CF and AI information (no-CF group, n = 63), with CF without AI (CF-only group, n = 49), and with optimal AI-guided ablation (AI group, n = 61). Early (within 3 months, ER) and late (from 3 months to 1 year, LR) AF recurrence after ablation was assessed. Procedure-related complications were also evaluated.

Results

The baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, excluding the baseline antiarrhythmic drug history. Additional substrate modification after pulmonary vein isolation was significantly low in frequency in the AI group (71.4%, no-CF; 69.4%, CF-only; 41.0%, AI, p = 0.001). The AI group had a shorter mean procedure-related time than the other groups. Both ER and LR of PeAF showed a trend of reduction with technological advances. With a short experience (less than 1 year), the CF-only group showed more ER and LR than that shown by the AI group. However, with a long experience (more than 1 year), ER and LR occurred similarly in the two groups. Procedure-related complications improved with technological advances.

Conclusion

As ablation technology advanced, favorable clinical outcomes with short procedural times were observed. However, prospective, large multicenter studies are needed to verify these results.

Hybrid Convergent Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Hybrid Convergent ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) combines minimally invasive surgical (epicardial) and catheter (endocardial) ablation. The procedural goal is to achieve more extensive, enduring ablation of AF substrate around the pulmonary veins, posterior wall, and vestibule of the posterior wall left atrium.

Objective

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on safety and effectiveness of contemporary Hybrid Convergent procedures.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and manual searches identified primary research articles on Hybrid Convergent. Inclusion criteria focused on contemporary practices (epicardial ablation device and lesions). Clinical outcomes at 1 year or later follow-up, patient population, procedural details, and major adverse events (MAE) were recorded.

Results

Of 249 records, 6 studies (5 observational, 1 randomized controlled trial) including 551 patients were included. Endocardial energy sources included radiofrequency and cryoballoon. Hybrid Convergent ablation was mostly performed in patients with drug-refractory persistent and longstanding persistent AF. Mean preprocedural AF duration ranged between 2 and 5.1 years. Most patients (∼92%) underwent Hybrid Convergent in a single hospitalization. At 1 year follow-up or later, 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61%–78%, n = 523) were free from atrial arrhythmias and 50% (95% CI: 42%–58%, n = 343) were free from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs. Thirty-day MAE rate was 6% (95% CI: 3%–8%, n = 551).

Conclusion

Hybrid Convergent ablation is an effective ablation strategy for persistent and longstanding persistent AF. Contemporary procedural approaches and published strategies aim to mitigate complications reported in early experience and address delayed inflammatory effusions.

Comparison of two catheters measuring local impedance: local impedance variation vs lesion characteristics and steam pops

PURPOSE

The size of the distal electrode and the method of measuring local impedance (LI) are different between the IntellaNav MiFi-OI™ (MiFi-OI) and IntellaNav STABLE POINT™ (SP) catheters. We investigated the impact of these differences on LI, efficacy, and safety of radiofrequency (RF) applications.

METHODS

RF applications at a range of powers (30 W, 40 W, and 50 W), contact forces (10 g and 20 g), and durations (10-120 s) were performed in excised porcine hearts (N = 48). LI variation was defined by δLI-drop (= initial LI - post-RF LI) and %LI-drop (= δLI-drop/initial LI) × 100, and the relationship between lesion characteristics and LI variation was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 576 lesions were examined. Although absolute δLI-drop during RF applications was significantly larger for the SP than MiFi-OI catheter (47[31-65]ohm for SP vs 37[24-51]ohm for MiFi-OI, p < 0.0001), %LI-drop was similar (23.3 [15.5-30.6]% in SP vs 24.9[17.3-32.5]% in MiFi-OI, p = 0.10). Although lesions produced by both catheters were similarly correlated with LI variation, the SP catheter produced generally larger lesions (depth; 5.0 [3.7-6.1]mm vs 4.7 [3.3-6.0]mm, p = 0.06; surface areas, 46.9 [36.8-58.8]mm² vs 44.7 [34.3-55.5]mm², p = 0.02; volume, 321 [165-533]mm³ vs 265[141-471]mm³, p = 0.02). Steam pops were similarly observed with both catheters. In both catheters, %LI-drop was superior to δLI-drop in correlation to lesion size (p < 0.0001) and in predicting steam pops (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no difference in safety profile is observed between MiFi-OI and SP catheters, the SP catheter produces larger lesions. %LI-drop is superior to δLI-drop in correlation to lesion size and in predicting steam pops as well as in normalizing the difference between catheters.

The Hybrid Convergent Procedure for Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation From an Electrophysiologist's Perspective

In atrial fibrillation (AF), the pulmonary veins (PV) are central to arrhythmogenicity and are targeted by PV isolation (PVI). As AF progresses, triggers become more prevalent in non-PV areas including the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW). Reported benefits of LAPW isolation in Cox-maze IV led to exploration of ablation strategies using endocardial catheters. However, no single approach to endocardial LAPW isolation exists. Relative success in comparison to PVI alone has been mixed. The hybrid convergent procedure was developed to combine minimally invasive surgical and electrophysiology techniques to accomplish effective PVI and LAPW isolation. Epicardial LAPW isolation is performed by a cardiothoracic surgeon followed by endocardial ablation by an electrophysiologist who ensures PVI completion and targets any remaining gaps. Safety and effectiveness of hybrid convergent was evaluated in the prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial, Convergence of Epicardial and Endocardial Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Persistent AF (CONVERGE). CONVERGE compared the effectiveness of the hybrid convergent procedure to endocardial catheter ablation for treatment of drug-refractory persistent and longstanding persistent AF and demonstrated primary effectiveness of higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias absent new/increased dose previously failed/intolerant anti-arrhythmic drugs through 12 months compared to endocardial catheter ablation. Greater freedom from AF and proportion of patients experiencing ≥90% burden reduction with hybrid convergent ablation were seen through 18 months follow-up. Improved electrophysiology lab efficiency was demonstrated by the reduction in endocardial ablation time with addition of epicardial ablation. This multi-disciplinary heart team procedure may improve outcomes in difficult-to-treat patients with advanced AF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Global Substrate Mapping and Targeted Ablation with Novel Gold-tip Catheter in De Novo Persistent AF

Results from catheter ablation for persistent AF are suboptimal, with no strategy other than pulmonary vein isolation showing clear benefit. Recently employed empirical strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation involve widespread atrial ablation in all patients and do not take into account patient-specific differences in AF mechanisms or phenotype. Charge density mapping using the non-contact AcQMap system (Acutus Medical) allows visualisation of whole-chamber activation during AF and reveals localised patterns of complex activation thought to represent important mechanisms for AF maintenance that can be targeted with focal ablation. In this review, the authors outline the fundamentals of this technology, the initial data exploring the mechanistic role of activation patterns seen and the application to ablation of persistent AF.

Ablation Therapy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of electrical disturbance of the heart and contributes to significant patient morbidity and mortality. With a better understanding of the mechanisms of atrial fibrillation and improvements in mapping and ablation technologies, ablation has become a preferred therapy for patients with symptomatic AF. Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone for AF ablation therapy, but particularly in patients with AF occurring for longer than 7 days (persistent AF), identifying clinically significant nonpulmonary vein targets and achieving durability of ablation lesions remains an important challenge.

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter randomized trial of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) versus PVI with posterior left atrial wall isolation (PWI) - The CAPLA study

BACKGROUND

The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is reduced in persistent AF (PsAF) compared to paroxysmal AF. Adjunctive ablation strategies have failed to show consistent incremental benefit over PVI alone in randomized studies. The left atrial posterior wall is a potential source of non-PV triggers and atrial substrate which may promote the initiation and maintenance of PsAF. Adding posterior wall isolation (PWI) to PVI had shown conflicting outcomes, with earlier studies confounded by methodological limitations.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether combining PWI with PVI significantly improves freedom from AF recurrence, compared to PVI alone, in patients with PsAF.

METHODS

This is a multi-center, prospective, international randomized clinical trial. 338 patients with symptomatic PsAF refractory to anti-arrhythmic therapy (AAD) will be randomized to either PVI alone or PVI with PWI in a 1:1 ratio. PVI involves wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, utilizing contact force sensing ablation catheters. PWI involves the creation of a floor line connecting the inferior aspect of the PVs, and a roof line connecting the superior aspect of the PVs. Follow up is for a minimum of 12 months with rhythm monitoring via implantable cardiac device and/or loop monitor, or frequent intermittent monitoring with an ECG device. The primary outcome is freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of > 30 seconds off AAD at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized study aims to determine the success and safety of adjunctive PWI to PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Contact-Force Guided Posterior Wall Isolation as an Adjunctive Ablation Strategy for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The efficacy of posterior wall isolation (PWI) on top of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is still controversial and little is known about the impact of contact-force (CF) technology.

Objective

In this retrospective study, we present our experience with PWI using CF sensing catheters and its efficacy and safety as an adjunctive ablation strategy on top of PVI for management of patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF.

Methods

A total of 73 consecutive patients (20.5% female) affected by persistent atrial fibrillation (10.9% long-standing) underwent PWI as an adjunctive therapy to PVI using CF sensing catheters. Outcomes were reported as incidence of atrial arrhythmic recurrences (ARs) lasting >30 seconds at follow up and in addition, in patients provided with insertable cardiac monitors (ICM), as burden of AF or atrial tachycardias (AT) at relevant time points.

Results

PWI was successfully achieved in 65 (89.0%) patients. Two (2.7%) minor vascular procedural complications were observed. At 1 and 2-year follow-up, ARs free survival was observed in 80.5% and 64.1% of patients, respectively with 75.3% of patients off antiarrhythmic drugs at the last follow-up. Ten patients underwent repeat ablations during the follow-up. At multivariate analysis, early ARs within 3 months after procedure, were associated with a two-fold increased risk of late ARs at follow-up. Among patients provided with ICM, PWI on top of PVI was able to reduce the mean AT/AF burden of more than 50% compared with pre-ablation time, reporting very low levels (≤ 5%) over 2 years.

Conclusions

In persistent atrial fibrillation, PWI on top of PVI using CF sensing catheters is safe and effective, providing great reduction of burden of ARs. Early ARs are associated with a greater risk of late recurrences.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia, and it results in adverse outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Racial and ethnic differences in AF management, although recognized, are poorly understood. This review summarizes racial differences in AF epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and management. In addition, it highlights the underrepresentation of racial and ethnic populations in AF clinical trials, especially trials focused on stroke prevention. Specific strategies are proposed for future research and initiatives that have potential to eliminate racial and ethnic differences in the care of patients with AF. Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare access, enrollment in clinical trials, resource allocation, prevention, and management will likely narrow the gaps in the care and outcomes of racial and ethnic minorities suffering from AF.

Recent clinical trials in atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of atrial fibrillation can be overwhelming with the amount of information and treatment options available today. This review discusses landmark and other clinically relevant trials published in the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

There have been several recent key clinical trials and subanalyses in the field of atrial fibrillation. Early rhythm control with ablation or antiarrhythmic medications has upended the previous practice of rate control for patients with atrial fibrillation. Vein of Marshall alcohol ablation in combination with endocardial mitral annular ablation and a hybrid epicardial/endocardial approach has shown promising results in the fight against persistent atrial fibrillation. Early ablation with cryoballoon therapy vs. antiarrhythmic therapy gives further evidence for early ablation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

SUMMARY

The rapid development in technology and medications to treat atrial fibrillation, prevent stroke and improve quality of life for patients has created a vast amount of information for physicians to process. The present review will focus on the recent (within 2 years) clinical trials in atrial fibrillation and the impact they may have on your practice.

Hybrid Convergent Procedure for the Treatment of Persistent and Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Recent advances have been made in AF treatment, including the role of early rhythm control and landmark clinical trials using ablation therapy. However, some treatment gaps remain, including the creation of durable lesions outside the pulmonary veins and effective treatment of longstanding persistent AF. A novel epicardial-endocardial ablation approach - the hybrid convergent procedure - was developed to combine surgical and catheter ablation techniques into a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to managing AF. In this review, the authors discuss recently published data on hybrid convergent ablation, including results of the CONVERGE clinical trial, in the context of current challenges to treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent AF. The review also aims to provide perspective on outstanding questions and future directions in this area.

Impact of pre-ablation weight loss on the success of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is an established risk factor for recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) after ablation. The impact of pre-procedure weight changes on freedom from AF (FFAF) after ablation in obese and nonobese patients is unknown.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation was performed. Before ablation, all candidates were encouraged to adopt healthy lifestyle habits according to American Heart Association guidelines, including weight loss, by their physician. The primary endpoint was FFAF through 1-year after completion of the 3-month blanking period.

RESULTS

Of the 601 patients (68% male; average age 62.1 ± 10.3 years) included in analysis, 234 patients (38.9%) were obese (body mass index ≥ 30) and 315 (52.4%) had paroxysmal AF. FFAF was observed in 420 patients (69.9%) at 15 months. Percent change in weight that occurred during the year before ablation independently predicted FFAF through 15-months in all patients (adjusted odds ratio =  1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-1.23). Subgroup analyses based on paroxysmal vs persistent AF, presence of obesity, and history of prior ablation were performed. Percent change in weight over the year before ablation was independently associated with FFAF in all subgroups except nonobese patients with persistent AF.

CONCLUSION

Pre-ablation weight loss was associated with FFAF in both obese and nonobese patients. Further studies are needed to define the optimal approach to weight loss before AF ablation.

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Ablation Index Versus Second Generation Cryoballoon in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Introduction

Both radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation are treatment options for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). An important recent innovation in RF ablation is Ablation Index (AI), known also as the VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module, a composite lesion quality marker whose use has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of acute and late pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias in PsAF. Due to a lack of direct comparative evidence between the latest generations of technologies, there is uncertainty regarding the best treatment option in PsAF. The objective of the present study was to conduct a matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) using individual patient-level data (IPD) to assess the comparative effectiveness of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ Catheter or the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF Catheter with AI/VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module (STAI) versus the second-generation CB catheter (Arctic Front Advance™; herein referred to as CB) with respect to 12-month atrial arrhythmia recurrence, fluoroscopy time, and procedural efficiency.

Methods

IPD for STAI were obtained from four investigator-initiated studies and were pooled. Comparable CB studies identified from a systematic literature review were also pooled. In the absence of a common treatment arm between STAI and CB studies, an unanchored MAIC was conducted. The primary analysis compared the pooled STAI IPD to the pooled CB cohort, with corrections for differences across trials, including eligibility criteria and patient baseline characteristics. Scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the primary analysis.

Results

In the primary analysis, which was adjusted for left atrial diameter (LAD), age, diabetes, and sex, STAI was associated with a statistically significant 65% relative reduction in the rate of arrhythmia recurrence compared to CB at 12-month follow-up (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.23, 0.52). STAI was associated with shorter total fluoroscopy time than CB but longer procedure time. Results were consistent across scenario and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

Radiofrequency ablation with AI significantly reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12-month follow-up and fluoroscopy time compared to CB, with longer procedure times.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01846-z.