Remote Monitoring Alert Burden: An Analysis of Transmission in >26,000 Patients

Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review

Over the past decade, remote monitoring (RM) has become an increasingly popular way to improve healthcare and health outcomes. Modern cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are capable of recording an increasing amount of data related to CIED function, arrhythmias, physiological status and hemodynamic parameters, providing in-depth and updated information on patient cardiovascular function. The extensive use of RM for patients with CIED allows for early diagnosis and rapid assessment of relevant issues, both clinical and technical, as well as replacing outpatient follow-up improving overall management without compromise safety. This approach is recommended by current guidelines for all eligible patients affected by different chronic cardiac conditions including either brady- and tachy-arrhythmias and heart failure. Beyond to clinical advantages, RM has demonstrated cost-effectiveness and is associated with elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Future perspectives include improving security, interoperability and diagnostic power as well as to engage patients with digital health technology. This review aims to update existing data concerning clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM in the wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias and Hear Failure (HF), disclosing also about safety, effectiveness, patient satisfaction and cost-saving.

Clinical practice of continuous rhythm monitoring after embolic stroke of undetermined source

AIMS

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for up to 20% of ischemic strokes annually. Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) is one important potential underlying cause. For AF, oral anticoagulation has evolved as the most preferable means of secondary stroke prevention. To detect unrecognized paroxysmal AF, long-term ECG monitoring is required, and implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) appear most suitable. Yet, ICMs are particularly costly, implantation is invasive, and remote monitoring places a personnel burden on health care providers. Here, we use data from a large cohort of ESUS patients to systematically analyze the effort of ICM remote monitoring for AF diagnosis and the strain on health care providers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From a prospective, single-center, observational ESUS registry, we analyzed all ICM-equipped patients post-ESUS (n = 172) between January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2019. Through January 2nd, 2023, 48 patients (27.9%) were diagnosed with AF by ICM remote monitoring. During follow-up, a total of 29,180 remote monitoring episodes were transmitted, of which 17,742 were alarms for AF. A systematic estimation of workload revealed that on average, 20.3 trained physician workhours are required to diagnose one patient with AF.

CONCLUSION

ICM remote monitoring is useful to diagnose AF in cohort of post-ESUS patients. However, the number of ICM alarms is high, even in a cohort at known high risk of AF and in whom AF detection is therapeutically consequential. Improved automated event classification, clear recommendations for ICM interrogation after AF diagnosis, and a careful patient selection for ICM monitoring are warranted.

Monitoring of Remotely Reprogrammable Implantable Loop Recorders With Algorithms to Reduce False-Positive Alerts

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly placed for arrhythmia detection. However, historically, ≈75% of ILR alerts are false positives, requiring significant time and effort for adjudication. The LINQII and LUX-Dx are remotely reprogrammable ILRs with dual-stage algorithms using artificial intelligence to reduce false positives, but their utility in routine clinical practice has not been studied.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified patients with the LINQII and LUX-Dx who were monitored by the Veterans Affairs National Cardiac Device Surveillance Program between March and June 2022. ILR programming was customized on the basis of implant indication. All alerts and every 90-day scheduled transmissions were manually reviewed. ILRs were remotely reprogrammed, as appropriate, after false-positive alerts or 2 consecutive same-type alerts, unless there was ongoing clinical need for that alert. Outcomes were total number of transmissions and false positives. We performed medical record review to determine if patients experienced any adverse clinical events, including hospitalization and mortality. Among 117 LINQII patients, there were 239 total alerts, 43 (18.0%) of which were false positives. Among 105 LUX-Dx patients, there were 300 total alerts, 115 (38.3%) of which were false positives. LINQIIs were reprogrammed 22 times, resulting in a decrease in median alerts/day from 0.13 to 0.03. LUX-Dx ILRs were reprogrammed 52 times, resulting in a decrease from 0.15 to 0.01 median alerts/day. There were no adverse clinical events that could have been identified by superior or earlier arrhythmia detection.

CONCLUSIONS

ILRs with artificial intelligence algorithms and remote reprogramming ability are associated with reduced alert burden because of higher true-positive rates than prior ILRs, without missing potentially consequential arrhythmias.

False-positive alarms in patients with implantable loop recorder followed by remote monitoring: A systematic review

Remote Monitoring (RM) has been shown to provide useful information about arrhythmic events in patients with implantable loop recorders (ILRs), however there is few and conflicting data about the false positive (FP) alarms burden and characteristics among ILR recipients. The aim of the present systematic review was to evaluate incidence and characteristics of FP alarms among ILR patients followed by RM. We developed a systematic research in Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases and selected all papers focused on false positive ILR transmissions published from June 1, 2013 to June 1, 2023. Case reports, meeting summaries, posters and simple reviews were excluded. Twelve reports were finally selected, including five prospective and seven retrospective studies. Information about population characteristics, device type and setting, overall transmissions and FP alarms and any adopted strategies to reduce them were extracted from an overall population of 3.305 patients. FP alarms were 59.7% of the overall remote transmissions and were found in 1/5 of the analyzed population. FP alarms for atrial fibrillation were the most common cause of false transmissions and were mainly due to premature atrial and ventricular complexes. No clinical predictors of FP alarms were identified, except for nonparasternal ILR implantation site. Since the overload work due to FP alarms might reduce the benefit of remote monitoring of ILR patients, the device optimization is an important step until an help from machine-learning algorithms is available.

Using technology to improve reconnection to remote monitoring in cardiac implantable electronic device patients

Background

Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) patients is now considered standard of care. However, a fundamental requirement of RM is continuous connectivity between the patient's implanted device and the CIED manufacturer's central server. This study examined the rate of RM disconnections in CIED recipients and the impact of short message service (SMS) to facilitate reconnections.

Methods

Using a platform that collects RM data from CIED manufacturers, we retrospectively examined the disconnection and reconnection events in 6085 patients from 20 medical centers. Each medical center reported their usual practice regarding RM disconnections, which consisted of either an automatic SMS from the platform to patients who were disconnected for 2 weeks or the standard of care (SC) of a phone call to patients.

Results

During a 1-year period, 43% of patients had at least 1 disconnection. Half of these patients experienced multiple disconnections. The use of SMS reduced the time to reconnection by 43% in comparison to SC. The median time to reconnect a disconnected patient was 11.0 [3.2, 29.0] days for SC vs 6.3 [1.3, 22.0] days for SMS (P < .0001). Furthermore, there was a high rate of reconnections within the first 48 hours of the SMS message, which was nearly double that in the SC arm.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of an automatic system to deliver an SMS to patients with a disconnected CIED to facilitate early reconnection to RM.

Informational Postcards Increase Engagement with Remote Monitoring Among Veterans with Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Remote monitoring (RM) of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduces morbidity and mortality. However, many patients are not adherent to RM.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effect of informational postcards on RM adherence.

DESIGN/PATIENTS

Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs.

INTERVENTION

In wave 1, Veterans who had sent at least 1 transmission within the past 2 years but had become non-adherent were randomly assigned to receive a postcard or no postcard. Those receiving postcards were randomized to 1 of 2 messages: (1) a"warning" postcard describing risks of non-adherence or (2) an "encouraging" postcard describing benefits of adherence. In wave 2, Veterans who had either not received a postcard in wave 1 or had since become non-adherent were mailed a postcard (again, randomized to 1 of 2 messages). Patients who did not send an RM transmission within 1 month were mailed a second, identical postcard.

MAIN MEASURES

Transmission within 70 days.

KEY RESULTS

Overall, 6351 Veterans were included. In waves 1 and 2, postcards were mailed to 5657 Veterans (2821 "warning" messages and 2836 "encouraging" messages). Wave 1 included 2178 Veterans as controls (i.e., not mailed a postcard), some of whom received a postcard in wave 2 if they remained non-adherent. In wave 2, 3473 postcards were sent. Of the 5657 patients mailed a postcard, 2756 (48.7%) sent an RM transmission within 70 days, compared to 530 (24.3%) of 2178 controls (absolute difference 24.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.2%, 26.6%). Of those who sent a transmission, 71.8% did so after the first postcard. Transmission rates at 70 days did not significantly differ between "warning" and "encouraging" messages (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.92, 1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Informational postcards led to a 24.4% absolute increase in adherence at 70 days among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs who were non-adherent to RM.

A mutually communicable external system resource in remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

BACKGROUND

Using third-party resources to manage remote monitoring (RM) data from implantable cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs) can assist in device clinic workflows. However, each hospital-acquired data is not used for further analysis as big data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We developed a real-time and automatically centralized system of CIED information from multiple hospitals. If the extensive data-based analysis suggests individual problems, it can be returned to each hospital. To show its feasibility, we prospectively analyzed data from six hospitals. For example, unexpected abnormal battery levels were easily illustrated without recall information.

CONCLUSIONS

The centralized RM system could be a new platform that promotes the utilization of device data as big data, and that information could be used for each patient's practice.

Barriers and Facilitators Associated With Remote Monitoring Adherence Among Veterans With Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Qualitative Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The Heart Rhythm Society strongly recommends remote monitoring (RM) of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because of the clinical outcome benefits to patients. However, many patients do not adhere to RM and, thus, do not achieve these benefits. There has been limited study of patient-level barriers and facilitators to RM adherence; understanding patient perspectives is essential to developing solutions to improve adherence.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify barriers and facilitators associated with adherence to RM among veterans with CIEDs followed by the Veterans Health Administration.

METHODS

We interviewed 40 veterans with CIEDs regarding their experiences with RM. Veterans were stratified into 3 groups based on their adherence to scheduled RM transmissions over the past 2 years: 6 fully adherent (≥95%), 25 partially adherent (≥65% but <95%), and 9 nonadherent (<65%). As the focus was to understand challenges with RM adherence, partially adherent and nonadherent veterans were preferentially weighted for selection. Veterans were mailed a letter stating they would be called to understand their experiences and perspectives of RM and possible barriers, and then contacted beginning 1 week after the letter was mailed. Interviews were structured (some questions allowing for open-ended responses to dive deeper into themes) and focused on 4 predetermined domains: knowledge of RM, satisfaction with RM, reasons for nonadherence, and preferences for health care engagement.

RESULTS

Of the 44 veterans contacted, 40 (91%) agreed to participate. The mean veteran age was 75.3 (SD 7.6) years, and 98% (39/40) were men. Veterans had been implanted with their current CIED for an average of 4.4 (SD 2.8) years. A total of 58% (23/40) of veterans recalled a discussion of home monitoring, and 45% (18/40) reported a good understanding of RM; however, when asked to describe RM, their understanding was sometimes incomplete or not correct. Among the 31 fully or partially adherent veterans, nearly all were satisfied with RM. Approximately one-third recalled ever being told the results of a remote transmission. Among partially or nonadherent veterans, only one-fourth reported being contacted by a Department of Veterans Affairs health care professional regarding not having sent a remote transmission; among those who had troubleshooted to ensure they could send remote transmissions, they often relied on the CIED manufacturer for help (this experience was nearly always positive). Most nonadherent veterans felt more comfortable engaging in RM if they received more information or education. Most veterans were interested in being notified of a successful remote transmission and learning the results of their remote transmissions.

CONCLUSIONS

Veterans with CIEDs often had limited knowledge about RM and did not recall being contacted about nonadherence. When they were contacted and troubleshooted, the experience was positive. These findings provide opportunities to optimize strategies for educating and engaging patients in RM.

Filtering of remote monitoring alerts transmitted by cardiac implantable electronic devices and reclassification of atrial fibrillation events by a new algorithm

Background

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are an important means of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, the AF burden measurements and notifications transmitted by CIEDs are not directly related to the clinical classification of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent AF. Moreover, AF alerts are the most frequent form of notification, imposing a time-consuming review on caregivers.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of standard AF burden-related notifications in remotely monitored (RM) patients with the incidence of events detected after filtering by a new proprietary algorithm implementing the standard European Society of Cardiology classification of AF.

Methods

Between 2017 and 2022, all RM patients with daily AF burden measurements available for ≥30 days and ≥1 AF burden-related alerts were enrolled at 68 medical centers. The incidence of CIED-transmitted alerts was compared to that of AF episodes detected by a new proprietary algorithm and classified as "first recorded episode of AF", "paroxysmal AF", "increased paroxysmal AF", "persistent AF", or "end of persistent AF back to paroxysmal AF or back to sinus rhythm."

Results

Between January 2017 and September 2022, this retrospective study analyzed data from 4162 recipients of an Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, or Medtronic CIED, RM over mean follow-up of 605 ± 386 days. The algorithm broke down 67,883 AF burden-related alerts into 9728 (14.3%) clinically relevant AF events.

Conclusion

A new AF alert algorithm successfully identified clinically significant AF events in RM CIED recipients and would markedly limit the total number of transmitted alerts that require review by caregivers.

Patient Outcomes Associated with the First Remote Monitoring Experience of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in South Korea

Purpose

Remote monitoring of cardiac devices reduces unnecessary outpatient visits and increases patient satisfaction. We aimed to evaluate remote monitoring in terms of patient satisfaction, economic efficiency, and safety.

Patients and Methods

This was a single university hospital survey. The time/medical cost efficacy and satisfaction index were evaluated using a questionnaire to investigate patient satisfaction before and after remote monitoring in patients using Biotronik implantable cardiac devices. The questionnaire was adopted and modified from Hwang's 2020 Survey on Telehealth Patient Experience.

Results

Remote monitoring was associated with a decrease in total outpatient visits. Of 1270 remote monitoring-related alerts clinicians received during the study period, more than 95% were from patients with pacemakers. Still, the severity of alerts was higher for implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators. The post-RM survey results demonstrated that patients were generally satisfied with RM, perceived it as cost-effective, and found that RM facilitated health management without disrupting their daily routines.

Conclusion

The study participants were satisfied with their first remote monitoring experience and reported having time- and cost-savings by using remote monitoring. Remote monitoring-related alerts from high-voltage devices were more severe and required medical intervention.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on practical management of the remote device clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

Real-life data on the workload of cardiac implantable electronic device remote monitoring in a large tertiary center

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) and implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly monitored by systems allowing remote transmission of data from the patient to the hospital. Remote monitoring (RM) has been shown to increase patient satisfaction and safety. However, real-life data on the number and causes of the RM transmissions, and actions initiated by them are scarce.

METHODS

A total of 3446 patients with CIED and 92 patients with ILR were included in the study. Data on the number of alerts, scheduled and patient-initiated transmissions as well as the causes and actions initiated by the transmissions were systematically collected from March 1 to December 30, 2022. The data was subdivided by the device type.

RESULTS

During the study period 7087 remote CIED and 1212 ILR transmissions were generated, (0.2 and 1.3 per patient per month), respectively. Of these transmissions 49% (4084) were automatic alerts, and 29% (2434) and 22% (1781) were scheduled and patient initiated, respectively. Most of the CIED alerts (73%) and the scheduled transmissions (90%) were nonactionable, and only 7% and 5% led to in-office follow-up, respectively. Off all ILR alerts (1011) PM implantation was scheduled to 11 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RM transmissions were common, but most of them were nonactionable. These real-life findings indicate that detailed analysis of the causes of the RM transmissions is important for optimization of the remote follow-up workload.

Factors affecting electrogram sensing in an insertable cardiac monitor: Insights from surface electrocardiogram mapping analysis

BACKGROUND

Fidelity of electrogram sensing may reduce false alerts from an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of vector length, implant angle, and patient factors on electrogram sensing using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) mapping.

METHODS

Twelve separate precordial single-lead surface ECGs were acquired from 150 participants at 2 interelectrode distances (75 and 45 mm), at 3 vector angles (vertical, oblique, and horizontal), and in 2 postures (upright and supine). A subset of 50 patients also received a clinically indicated ICM implant in 1:1 ratio (Reveal LINQ [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN]/BIOMONITOR III [Biotronik, Berlin, Germany]). All ECGs and ICM electrograms were analyzed by blinded investigators using DigitizeIt software (V2.3.3, Braunschweig, Germany). The P-wave visibility threshold was set at > 0.015 mV. Logistic regression was used to identify factors affecting P-wave amplitude.

RESULTS

A total of 1800 tracings from 150 participants (44.5% [n = 68] female; median age 59 [35-73] years) were assessed. The median P- and R-wave amplitudes were 45% and 53% larger with vector lengths of 75 and 45 mm, respectively (P < .001 for both). The oblique orientation yielded the best P- and R-wave amplitudes, while posture change did not affect P-wave amplitude. Mixed effects modeling found that visible P-waves occur more frequently with a vector length of 75 mm than with 45 mm (86% vs 75%, respectively; P < .0001). A longer vector length improved both P-wave amplitude and visibility in all body mass index categories. There was a moderate correlation of P- and R-wave amplitudes from the ICM electrograms to those from surface ECG recordings (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.74 and 0.80, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Longer vector length and oblique implant angle yielded the best electrogram sensing and are relevant considerations for ICM implantation procedures.

The digital journey: 25 years of digital development in electrophysiology from an Europace perspective

AIMS

Over the past 25 years there has been a substantial development in the field of digital electrophysiology (EP) and in parallel a substantial increase in publications on digital cardiology.In this celebratory paper, we provide an overview of the digital field by highlighting publications from the field focusing on the EP Europace journal.

RESULTS

In this journey across the past quarter of a century we follow the development of digital tools commonly used in the clinic spanning from the initiation of digital clinics through the early days of telemonitoring, to wearables, mobile applications, and the use of fully virtual clinics. We then provide a chronicle of the field of artificial intelligence, a regulatory perspective, and at the end of our journey provide a future outlook for digital EP.

CONCLUSION

Over the past 25 years Europace has published a substantial number of papers on digital EP, with a marked expansion in digital publications in recent years.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management

This reviews the transition of remote monitoring of patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices from curiosity to standard of care. This has been delivered by technology evolution from patient-activated remote interrogations at appointed intervals to continuous monitoring that automatically flags clinically actionable information to the clinic for review. This model has facilitated follow-up and received professional society recommendations. Additionally, continuous monitoring has provided a new level of granularity of diagnostic data enabling extension of patient management from device to disease management. This ushers in an era of digital medicine with wider applications in cardiovascular medicine.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic

Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.

Remote Patient Monitoring: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going?

Purpose of Review

Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is an important part of patient follow-up. The increasing number of patients with CIEDs and the recent pandemic pose several challenges for already limited device clinic resources. This review focuses on recent evolutions in RM and identifies future needs to improve RM.

Recent Findings

RM has been associated with multiple clinical benefits, including improved survival, early detection of actionable events, reduction in inappropriate shocks, longer battery lives, and more efficient healthcare utilization. The survival benefit was driven by studies using alert-based continuous RM with daily transmissions and fast reaction times. Patients report a high satisfaction rate without significant differences in quality of life between RM and in-office follow-up.The increasing workload, due to the increasing number of CIEDs implanted with daily remote transmissions, results in several challenges for the future of RM. RM requires appropriate reimbursement for RM device clinics to optimize patient/staff ratios, including sufficient non-clinical and administrative support. Universal alert programming and data processing may minimize inter-manufacturer differences, improve the signal-to-noise ratio, and allow the development of standard operating protocols and workflows. In the future, programming by remote control and true remote programming may further improve remote CIED management, patient quality of life, and device clinic workflows.

Summary

RM should be considered standard of care in management of patients with CIEDs. The clinical benefits of RM can be maximized by an alert-based continuous RM model. Adapted healthcare policies are required to keep RM manageable for the future.

A case report of an unusual cause of increased impedance after generator exchange

Background

Remote monitoring has emerged as a complement to in-person care for patient with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). It provides the care team with information about device integrity, programming issues, or other medical data (i.e. arrhythmias) and since 2015 has been recognized as a part of standard management by the Heart and Rhythm Society for all patients with CIEDs. However, while it can provide invaluable information to providers, the volume of generated data can increase the risk of oversight. We present a novel case of apparent device malfunction that on closer scrutiny was obvious, but provides a lesson in the mechanisms by which data can be artifactual.

Case summary

A 62-year-old male presented after his cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) alerted him that his device was at an elective replacement interval (ERI). He underwent an uncomplicated generator exchange; however, 2 weeks later, a remote alert showed that his device was at ERI and all impedances were above the upper limit. Device interrogation the following day demonstrated that the new device was functioning appropriately and his home monitor had in fact paired with his old generator. He obtained a new home monitor, and subsequent remote transmissions have demonstrated that his device is functioning appropriately.

Discussion

This case demonstrates the importance of careful review of details from home-monitoring data. While concerning for device malfunction, there could be alternative causes when alerts are generated by remote monitoring. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this mechanism of alert via a home-monitoring device and should be considered when reviewing unusual remote download data.

Alert-driven vs scheduled remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators: A cost-consequence analysis from the TRUST trial

BACKGROUND

Alert-driven remote patient monitoring (RPM) or fully virtual care without routine evaluations may reduce clinic workload and promote more efficient resource allocation, principally by diminishing nonactionable patient encounters.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-consequence analysis to compare 3 postimplant implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) follow-up strategies: (1) in-person evaluation (IPE) only; (2) RPM-conventional (hybrid of IPE and RPM); and (3) RPM-alert (alert-based ICD follow-up).

METHODS

We constructed a decision-analytic Markov model to estimate the costs and benefits of the 3 strategies over a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of the US Medicare payer. Aggregate and patient-level data from the TRUST (Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-up) randomized clinical trial informed clinical effectiveness model inputs. TRUST randomized 1339 patients 2:1 to conventional RPM or IPE alone, and found that RPM was safe and reduced the number of nonactionable encounters. Cost data were obtained from the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost.

RESULTS

Mean cumulative follow-up costs per patient were $12,688 in the IPE group, $12,001 in the RPM-conventional group, and $11,011 in the RPM-alert group. Compared to the IPE group, both the RPM-conventional and RPM-alert groups were associated with lower incremental costs of -$687 (95% confidence interval [CI] -$2138 to +$638) and -$1,677 (95% CI -$3134 to -$304), respectively. Therefore, the RPM-alert strategy was most cost-effective, with an estimated cost-savings in 99% of simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Alert-driven RPM was economically attractive and, if patient outcomes and safety are comparable to those of conventional RPM, may be the preferred strategy for ICD follow-up.

Impact of intensive follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices via remote monitoring: A pilot study

Background

The volume of remote monitoring (RM) data generates a significant workload and is generally dealt with by clinic staff during standard office hours, potentially delaying clinical action.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical efficiency and workflow of implementing intensive RM (IRM) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) when compared with standard RM (SRM).

Methods

From a cohort of >1500 remotely monitored devices, 70 patients were randomly selected to undergo IRM. For comparison, an equal number of matched patients were prospectively selected for SRM. Intensive follow-up occurred via automated vendor-neutral software with rapid alert processing by International Board of Heart Rhythm Examiners-certified device specialists. Standard follow-up was conducted by clinic staff during office hours via individual device vendor interfaces. Alerts were categorized on the basis of the level of acuity as actionable (red [high], yellow [moderate]), or green [not requiring action]).

Results

Over 9 months of follow-up, 922 remote transmissions were received; 339 (36.8%) were coded as actionable alerts (118 in IRM and 221 in SRM; P < .001). The median time from initial transmission to review was 6 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1.8-16.8 hours) in the IRM group compared with 10.5 hours (IQR 6.0-32.2 hours) in the SRM group (P < .001). The median time from transmission to review of actionable alerts in the IRM group was 5.1 hours (IQR 2.3-8.9 hours) compared with 9.1 hours (IQR 6.7-32.5 hours) in the SRM group (P < .001).

Conclusion

Intensive and managed RM results in a significant reduction in time to review alerts and number of actionable alerts. Monitoring with enhanced alert adjudication is needed to facilitate device clinic efficiency and optimize patient care.

Study Registration

ACTRN12621001275853.

Diagnostic yield of an insertable cardiac monitor in a large patient population

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are increasingly used for cardiac rhythm diagnosis with expanding indications. Little has been reported about their use and efficacy.

Objective

The study sought to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel ICM (Biotronik BIOMONITOR III) including the time to diagnosis in unselected patients with different ICM indications.

Methods

Patients from 2 prospective clinical studies were included to determine the diagnostic yield of the ICM. The primary endpoint was time to clinical diagnosis per implant indication or to the first change in atrial fibrillation (AF) therapy.

Results

A total of 632 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 233 ± 168 days. Of 384 patients with (pre)syncope, 34.2% had a diagnosis at 1 year. The most frequent therapy was permanent pacemaker implantation. Of 133 patients with cryptogenic stroke, 16.6% had an AF diagnosis at 1 year, resulting in oral anticoagulation. Of 49 patients with an indication for AF monitoring, 41.0% had a relevant change in AF therapy based on ICM data at 1 year. Of 66 patients with other indications, 35.4% received a rhythm diagnosis at 1 year. Moreover, 6.5% of the cohort had additional diagnoses: 26 of 384 patients with syncope, 8 of 133 patients with cryptogenic stroke, and 7 of 49 patients with AF monitoring.

Conclusion

In a large unselected patient population with heterogeneous ICM indications, the primary endpoint of rhythm diagnosis was achieved in ∼1 in 4, and additional clinically relevant findings was achieved in 6.5% of patients at short-term follow-up.

Clinician use of data elements from cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in clinical practice

Background

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) capture an abundance of data for clinicians to review and integrate into the clinical decision-making process. The multitude of data from different device types and vendors presents challenges for viewing and using the data in clinical practice. Efforts are needed to improve CIED reports by focusing on key data elements used by clinicians.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to uncover the extent to which clinicians use the specific types of data elements from CIED reports in clinical practice and explore clinicians' perceptions of CIED reports.

Methods

A brief, web-based, cross-sectional survey study was deployed using snowball sampling from March 2020 through September 2020 to clinicians who are involved in the care of patients with CIEDs.

Results

Among 317 clinicians, the majority specialized in electrophysiology (EP) (80.1%), were from North America (88.6%), and were white (82.2%). Over half (55.3%) were physicians. Arrhythmia episodes and ventricular therapies rated the highest among 15 categories of data presented, and nocturnal or resting heart rate and heart rate variability were rated the lowest. As anticipated, clinicians specializing in EP reported using the data significantly more than other specialties across nearly all categories. A subset of respondents offered general comments describing preferences and challenges related to reviewing reports.

Conclusion

CIED reports contain an abundance of information that is important to clinicians; however, some data are used more frequently than others, and reports could be streamlined for users to improve access to key information and facilitate more efficient clinical decision making.

The use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: an EHRA physician survey

It is unclear to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the use of remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The present physician-based European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aimed to assess the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on RM of CIEDs among EHRA members and how it changed the current practice. The survey comprised 27 questions focusing on RM use before and during the pandemic. Questions focused on the impact of COVID-19 on the frequency of in-office visits, data filtering, reasons for initiating in-person visits, underutilization of RM during COVID-19, and RM reimbursement. A total of 160 participants from 28 countries completed the survey. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, there was a significant increase in the use of RM in patients with pacemakers (PMs) and implantable loop recorders (ILRs) during the COVID-19 pandemic (PM 24.2 vs. 39.9%, P = 0.002; ILRs 61.5 vs. 73.5%, P = 0.028), while there was a trend towards higher utilization of RM for cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker (CRT-P) devices during the pandemic (44.5 vs. 55%, P = 0.063). The use of RM with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) did not significantly change during the pandemic (ICD 65.2 vs. 69.6%, P = 0.408; CRT-D 65.2 vs. 68.8%, P = 0.513). The frequency of in-office visits was significantly lower during the pandemic (P < 0.001). Nearly two-thirds of participants (57 out of 87 respondents), established new RM connections for CIEDs implanted before the pandemic with 33.3% (n = 29) delivering RM transmitters to the patient's home address, and the remaining 32.1% (n = 28) activating RM connections during an in-office visit. The results of this survey suggest that the crisis caused by COVID-19 has led to a significant increase in the use of RM of CIEDs.

Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?

Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.

Organizational Models for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring: Current and Future Directions

This review provides an overview of the literature on the organization, staffing, and structure of remote monitoring (RM) clinics, primarily from countries in Western Europe and United States, as well as the challenges, considerations, and future directions for RM clinic models of care. Using a current case example of an RM clinic in the Midwestern United States, this document provides key information from the viewpoint of a clinic undergoing a shift in workflow. Finally, this review distills key considerations for RM management for electrophysiology clinics, vendors and industry, and policy makers.