Identifying Origin of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Using 2 Stationary Linear Decapolar Catheters: A Novel Algorithm

Integrated Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The global incidence of atrial fibrillation is on the rise. Atrial fibrillation, a complex disease, heightens the likelihood of heart failure, stroke, and mortality, necessitating careful attention. Controlling heart rate and rhythm, addressing risk factors, and preventing strokes are fundamental in treating atrial fibrillation. Catheter ablation stands out as the primary approach for atrial fibrillation rhythm control. Nevertheless, the limited success rates pose a significant challenge to catheter ablation, particularly for persistent atrial fibrillation. Various adjunctive ablation techniques are currently under investigation to enhance the effectiveness of catheter ablation. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art and the latest optimized treatments for persistent atrial fibrillation in the areas of rhythm control, heart rate control, and risk factor management.

Preprocedural Screening Tool to Guide Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Testing in First-Time Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can benefit from targeting non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers. Preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals can guide planning of ablation strategy. This study aimed to create a preprocedural screening tool to identify patients at risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation.

METHODS

All patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Those who underwent non-PV trigger provocative maneuvers or had spontaneous non-PV trigger firing were included. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia that occurred spontaneously, after AF cardioversion, or after standard provocative maneuvers. The provocative maneuvers included incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min) and an atrial burst pacing protocol. Risk factors associated with non-PV triggers in a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination were used to create a risk score.

RESULTS

A total of 163 (8.0%) of 2038 patients had non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. Based on the multivariable model, we created a risk score using female sex (1 point; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]), sinus node dysfunction (1 point; OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]), prior cardiac surgery (1 point; OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]), moderate to severe left atrial enlargement (2 points; OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]), and cardiac sarcoidosis/amyloidosis (4 points; OR, 7.24 [95% CI, 3.03-17.33]). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling showed an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751). Among all first-time AF ablations, 68.1% of procedures were low-risk for non-PV triggers (scores 0-1, 4.3% risk), 17.8% were intermediate-risk (score 2, 10.5% risk), and 14.1% were high-risk (score ≥3, 22.6% risk).

CONCLUSIONS

A preprocedural screening tool can classify patients based on their risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. This risk score can guide operators to identify patients who would benefit most from adjunctive non-PV trigger testing. However, further validation is needed to confirm these findings.

Embryological Classification of Arrhythmogenic Triggers Initiating Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent multifactorial arrhythmia associated with specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is an established treatment for AF; however, recurrence risk remains caused by AF triggers beyond the PVs. Understanding the embryological origins of these triggers could improve treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between embryologically categorized AF triggers, clinical and genetic backgrounds, and postablation prognosis.

METHODS

In cohort 1, comprising 3,067 patients with AF undergoing PV isolation, the clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Among them, 815 patients underwent genetic analysis using AF-associated SNPs (cohort 2). Patients were delineated based on the developmental origin of the AF triggers: common PV, sinus venosus (SV), and primitive atrium (PA).

RESULTS

SV-origin extra-PV AF triggers occurred in 20.3% (n = 622) of patients, whereas PA-origin triggers occurred in 11.9% (n = 365) of patients in cohort 1. Multivariate analysis of cohort 2 revealed that female sex, lower body mass index, absence of hypertension, rs2634073 near PITX2, and rs6584555 in NEURL1 were associated with SV-AF, whereas nonparoxysmal AF and rs2634073 near PITX2 were predictors of PA-AF. The PA group had a significantly higher arrhythmia recurrence rate after repeated procedures than the common PV (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.34-2.29; P < 0.001) and SV-AF (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.19-1.45; P < 0.001) groups with more de novo AF triggers. However, the incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SV-derived AF triggers may have hereditary factors with a favorable postablation prognosis, whereas PA-derived triggers are linked to AF persistence and poor ablation response. Variants near PITX2 may play a pivotal role in extra-PV triggers.

Incremental Benefit of Stepwise Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Provocation During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The importance of nonpulmonary vein (PV) triggers for the initiation/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the incremental benefit of provocative maneuvers for identifying non-PV triggers.

METHODS

We included consecutive patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between 2020 and 2022. The provocation protocol included step 1, identification of spontaneous non-PV triggers after cardioversion of AF and/or during sinus rhythm; step 2, isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 μg/min); and step 3, atrial burst pacing to induce AF followed by cardioversion during residual or low-dose isoproterenol infusion or induce focal atrial tachycardia. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia.

RESULTS

Of 1,372 patients included, 883 (64.4%) underwent the complete stepwise provocation protocol with isoproterenol infusion and burst pacing, 334 (24.3%) isoproterenol infusion only, 77 (5.6%) burst pacing only, and 78 (5.7%) no provocative maneuvers (only step 1). Overall, 161 non-PV triggers were found in 135 (9.8%) patients. Of these, 51 (31.7%) non-PV triggers occurred spontaneously, and the remaining 110 (68.3%) required provocative maneuvers for induction. Among those receiving the complete stepwise provocation protocol, there was a 2.2-fold increase in the number of patients with non-PV triggers after isoproterenol infusion, and the addition of burst pacing after isoproterenol infusion led to a total increase of 3.6-fold with the complete stepwise provocation protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of non-PV triggers require provocative maneuvers for induction. A stepwise provocation protocol consisting of isoproterenol infusion followed by burst pacing identifies a 3.6-fold higher number of patients with non-PV triggers.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score

BACKGROUND

Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups.

METHODS

Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%).

RESULTS

In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807).

CONCLUSION

A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.