Accuracy of symptoms and pulse checking for detecting atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in the possibility of discontinuing oral anticoagulation following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether patients can accurately detect arrhythmia recurrences following ablation. We therefore sought to characterize the accuracy of pulse checking and arrhythmia symptoms for the identification of AF following ablation.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) treated with catheter ablation for AF who recorded the results from minimum twice daily pulse checks and additionally with arrhythmia symptoms into a diary for 2 months following their procedure. Accuracy of this self-assessment protocol was determined by comparison to ICM-detected AF.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients (age 69 ± 8 years, 30 (55%) male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1. 5) were included. Patients recorded a total of 5911 pulse checks, and there were 280 episodes of ICM-documented AF among 26 patients with an average duration of 2.5 ± 3.3 h. Among 362 episodes of patient-suspected AF, 134 correlated with ICM-identified AF (37% true positive rate). Of the 5549 pulse checks that did not identify AF, 196 correlated with ICM-identified AF (4% false negative rate). Twice daily pulse checking had a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 96% for identifying each episode of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that a strategy of pulse checks and symptom assessment is insufficient to identify all episodes of AF in many patients following catheter ablation.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score

BACKGROUND

Targeting nonpulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups.

METHODS

Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as nonpulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%).

RESULTS

In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807).

CONCLUSION

A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Evaluation of organized atrial arrhythmias after cryptogenic stroke

Background

Long-term rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) following a cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established. However, the burden of organized atrial arrhythmias in this population is not well defined.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for organized atrial arrhythmias in patients with CS.

Methods

We evaluated all patients with CS who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) between October 2014 and April 2020. All ICM transmissions categorized as AF, tachycardia, or bradycardia were reviewed. We evaluated the time to detection of organized AF and the combination of either organized atrial arrhythmia or AF.

Results

A total of 195 CS patients with ICMs were included (51% men; mean age 66 ± 12 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASC score 4.6). Over mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 11.2 months, organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds were detected in 45 patients (23%), of whom 62% did not have AF. Seventeen patients had both organized atrial arrhythmia and AF, and another 21 patients had AF only. Compared to those with normal left atrial size, patients with left atrial enlargement had a higher adjusted risk for development of atrial arrhythmias (mild left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.75; moderate/severe left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.92).

Conclusion

Organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds are detected in nearly one-fourth of CS patients. Two-thirds of these patients did not have AF. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of organized atrial arrhythmias on recurrent stroke risk.

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures

BACKGROUND

Pectoral nerve (PECs) blocks are established regional anesthesia techniques that can provide analgesia to the anterior chest wall. Although commonly performed preoperatively by anesthesiologists, the feasibility of electrophysiologist-performed PECs blocks from within cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pockets at the time of implantation has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of routine PECs blocks performed by the electrophysiologist from within the exposed device pocket at the time of CIED procedures.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CIED procedures underwent a PECs I block (15 cc of 1% lidocaine/0.25% bupivacaine) injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles guided by ultrasound placed in the device pocket, or PECs II block, which included a second injection (15 cc) between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. Postoperatively, pain was assessed on a numeric scale (0-10) at 1, 2, 4, and 24 h, and 2 weeks after the procedure.

RESULTS

Among 20 patients (age 65 ± 16 years, 70% male, 55% with history of chronic pain), PECs I (75%) and PECs II (25%) blocks were performed. The procedures were de novo implantation (n = 17) or device revision (n = 3). The average pain score in the first 4 h was 0.4 ± 0.8 and 0.3 ± 0.6 at 24 h after the procedure. During the 24-h postoperative period, 4 patients received opioids. Two patients were discharged with opioids for pain unrelated to the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative PECs blocks can be feasibly performed from within an exposed pocket at the time of CIED procedures with minimal postoperative pain.

Identifying Origin of Nonpulmonary Vein Triggers Using 2 Stationary Linear Decapolar Catheters: A Novel Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Targeting nonpulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein isolation can be challenging. NPVTs are often single ectopic beats with a surface P-wave obscured by a QRS or T-wave.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to construct an algorithm to regionalize the site of origin of NPVTs using only intracardiac bipolar electrograms from 2 linear decapolar catheters positioned in the posterolateral right atrium (along the crista terminalis with the distal bipole pair in the superior vena cava) and in the proximal coronary sinus (CS).

METHODS

After pulmonary vein isolation in 42 patients with AF, pacing from 15 typical anatomic NPVT sites was conducted. For each pacing site, the electrogram activation sequence was analyzed from the CS catheter (simultaneous/chevron/inverse chevron/distal-proximal/proximal-distal) and activation time (ie, CSCTAT) between the earliest electrograms from the 2 decapolar catheters was measured referencing the earliest CS electrogram; a negative CSCTAT value indicates the crista terminalis catheter electrogram was earlier, and a positive CSCTAT value indicates the CS catheter electrogram was earlier. A regionalization algorithm with high predictive value was defined and tested in a validation cohort with AF NPVTs localized with electroanatomic mapping.

RESULTS

In the study patient cohort (71% male; 43% with persistent AF, 52% with left atrial dilation), the algorithm grouped with high precision (positive predictive value 81%-99%, specificity 94%-100%, and sensitivity 30%-94%) the 15 distinct pacing sites into 9 clinically useful regions. Algorithm testing in a 98 patient validation cohort showed predictive accuracy of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

An algorithm defined by the activation sequence and timing of electrograms from 2 linear multipolar catheters provided accurate regionalization of AF NPVTs to guide focused detailed mapping.

Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Neuromodulation is increasingly recognized as a therapeutic strategy for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (SGB), transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TcMS), and surgical cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) have all been utilized in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize contemporary use and outcomes of these neuromodulation techniques for patients with refractory VA.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory VA from 2019 to 2021 who were treated with SGB, TcMS, or CSD.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 15 polymorphic VAs [44%], refractory to 1.8 ± 0.8 AADs) met inclusion criteria. SGB was performed on 11 patients (32%), TcMS on 19 (56%), and CSD on 7 (21%). Neuromodulation was associated with a reduction in the number of episodes of sustained VAs from 7 [IQR: 4-12] episodes in the 24 hours before the initial neuromodulation strategy to 0 [IQR: 0-1] episodes in the subsequent 24 hours (P < 0.001). During 1.2 ± 1.1 years of follow-up, 21 (62%) experienced recurrent VAs, and among those patients, the median time to recurrence was 3 [IQR: 1-25] days. Outcomes were similar among patients with monomorphic and polymorphic VAs. Among patients who had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days before neuromodulation, the burden of VAs decreased from 11 [IQR: 7-12] episodes to 0 episodes in the 24 hours after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Autonomic neuromodulation with SGB, TcMS, or CSD in patients with AAD-refractory VAs is safe and results in substantial acute reduction of VA although recurrent arrhythmias are common, and not all patients experience a reduction in arrhythmia burden.

Safety of Pill-in-the-Pocket Class 1C Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that initial trial of a "pill-in-the-pocket" (PIP) Class 1C antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) be performed in a monitored setting because of the potential for adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize real-world, contemporary use of the PIP approach, including the setting of initiation and incidence of adverse events.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania treated with a PIP approach for AF between 2007 and 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients (age 56 ± 13 years; 182 [67%] male; CHA₂DS₂VASc score 1.1 ± 1.2) took a first dose of PIP AAD. Flecainide was used in 151 (55%) and propafenone in 122 (45%). The first dose of PIP AAD was taken in a monitored setting in 167 (62%). Significant adverse events occurred in 7 patients (3%), 2 of whom had taken the dose in a monitored setting. Significant adverse events included unexplained syncope (1 of 7), symptomatic bradycardia/hypotension (4 of 7), and 1:1 atrial flutter (2 of 7). All occurred in patients taking 300 mg of flecainide (n = 4) or 600 mg of propafenone (n = 3). Electrical cardioversion was performed in 29 (11%) patients because of failure of the AAD to terminate AF. One patient required intravenous fluids and vasopressors for 2 hours because of persistent hypotension and bradycardia. Two patients required permanent pacemakers for bradycardia. The remaining patients required no intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the current recommendation to initiate PIP AAD in a monitored setting because of rare significant adverse reactions that can require urgent intervention.

Impact of Left Ventricular Papillary Muscle Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation on Mitral Valve Function

BACKGROUND

Although efficacious, catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) originating from left ventricular (LV) papillary muscles (PAPs) has the potential to affect mitral valve (MV) function.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether lesions delivered during CA of VAs from LV PAPs affected MV function.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing CA of LV PAP VAs from January 2015 to December 2020 in whom both preprocedural and postprocedural transthoracic echocardiography was performed were included. Radiofrequency ablation was performed with an irrigated-tip catheter with or without contact force sensing and intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. The PAPs were delineated into segments: tip, body, and base. Pre- and post-CA transthoracic echocardiograms were reviewed to assess MV regurgitation, which was graded 0 (none), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). A change of ≥2 grades from baseline was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients (mean age 63 ± 15 years, 78% men) were included. VAs were ablated from the anterolateral PAP in 35% (n = 36), posteromedial PAP in 55% (n = 57), and both PAPs in 10% (n = 10). Lesion distribution was as follows: PAP tip in 52 (50%), PAP base in 34 (33%), PAP body in 13 (13%), and entire PAP in 4 (4%). The mean number of lesions delivered was 16 ± 13 (median 14). Of 103 patients, 102 (99%) showed no change in MV function.

CONCLUSIONS

Using intracardiac echocardiographic guidance, lesions can be safely delivered on various aspects of this structure without adverse impact on MV function.

Clinical applications of heart rhythm monitoring tools in symptomatic patients and for screening in high-risk groups

Recent technological advances have facilitated and diversified the options available for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. Ranging from simple resting or exercise electrocardiograms to more sophisticated and expensive smartphones and implantable cardiac monitors. These tests and devices may be used for varying periods of time depending on symptom frequency. The choice of the most appropriate heart rhythm test should be guided by clinical evaluation and optimized following accurate characterization of underlying symptoms, 'red flags', risk factors, and consideration of cost-effectiveness of the different tests. This review provides evidence-based guidance for assessing suspected arrhythmia in patients who present with symptoms or in the context of screening, such as atrial fibrillation or advanced conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk groups. This is intended to help clinicians choose the most appropriate diagnostic tool to facilitate the management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Monitoring and diagnosis of intermittent arrhythmias: evidence-based guidance and role of novel monitoring strategies

Technological advances have made diagnosis of heart rhythm disturbances much easier, with a wide variety of options, including single-lead portable devices, smartphones/watches to sophisticated implantable cardiac monitors, allowing accurate data to be collected over different time periods depending on symptoms frequency. This review provides an overview of the novel and existing heart rhythm testing options, including a description of the supporting evidence for their use. A description of each of the tests is provided, along with discussion of their advantages and limitations. This is intended to help clinicians towards choosing the most appropriate test, thus improving diagnostic yield management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Impact of atrial fibrillation recurrences during the blanking period following catheter ablation on long-term arrhythmia-free survival: a prospective study with continuous monitoring

BACKGROUND

The significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences during the 90-day blanking period following catheter ablation is controversial. Studies to date examining the impact of AF recurrences during the blanking period have been limited by intermittent monitoring. We sought to test whether AF recurrences during the blanking period are associated with long-term recurrences using continuous monitoring.

METHODS

Patients undergoing AF ablation by a single operator at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2019, who either already had a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with an atrial lead or received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), were followed for long-term AF recurrence. Recurrence was defined as > 30 s by CIED and > 2 min by ICM. All device-reported AF episodes were adjudicated by a physician.

RESULTS

Of 196 consecutive patients, 51 (26%) had AF recurrence in the blanking period and 145 (74%) did not. Over the year following ablation, those who had an AF recurrence in the blanking period were significantly more likely to have long-term AF recurrences than those without AF in the blanking period (log rank p < 0.001). The higher the burden of AF recurrences during the blanking period, the more likely AF was to recur long-term (hazard ratio 1.04 [CI 1.01-1.06] per 1% increase in burden, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Using continuous monitoring of a sizable population, we confirmed that AF recurrences in the blanking period following ablation are in fact associated with long-term AF recurrences. The higher the burden of recurrence, the more likely AF is to recur long-term.

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Explantation-A Single Tertiary Center Experience

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an appealing alternative to transvenous ICD systems. However, data on indications for S-ICD explantations are sparse. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and indications for S-ICD explantation at a large tertiary referral center. We conducted a retrospective study of all S-ICD explantations performed from 2014–2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, implantation characteristics, and indications for explantation were collected. A total of 64 patients underwent S-ICD explantation during the study period. During that time, there were 410 S-ICD implantations at our institution, of which 53 (12.9%) were explanted with a mean duration from implant to explant of 19.7 ± 20.1 months. The mean age of the patients at explantation was 44.8 ± 15.3 years, and 42% (n = 27) were women. The indication for S-ICD implantation was primary prevention in 58% and secondary prevention in 42% of patients, respectively. The most common reason for explantation was infection (32.8%), followed by abnormal sensing (25%) and the need for pacing (18.8%). Those who underwent S-ICD explantation for pacing indications were significantly older (55.7 ± 13.6 vs. 42.3 ± 14.6 years, P = 0.005) with a wider QRS duration (111 ± 19 vs. 98 ± 19 ms, P = 0.03) at device implantation compared to patients who underwent explantation for other indications. The incidence of S-ICD explantation in a large tertiary practice was 12.9%. While infection was the indication for one-third of the explantations, a significant number of explantations were due to sensing abnormalities and the need for pacing. These data may have implications for patient selection for S-ICD implantation.

Effect of Transcutaneous Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Ventricular Tachycardia Storm: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Autonomic neuromodulation provides therapeutic benefit in ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm. Transcutaneous magnetic stimulation (TcMS) can noninvasively and nondestructively modulate a patient's nervous system activity and may reduce VT burden in patients with VT storm.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TcMS of the left stellate ganglion for patients with VT storm.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial took place at a single tertiary referral center between August 2019 and July 2021. The study included 26 adult patients with 3 or more episodes of VT in 24 hours.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single session of either TcMS that targeted the left stellate ganglion (n = 14) or sham stimulation (n = 12).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was freedom from VT in the 24-hour period following randomization. Key secondary outcomes included safety of TcMS on cardiac implantable electronic devices, as well as burden of VT in the 72-hour period following randomization.

RESULTS

Among 26 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years; 20 [77%] male), a mean (SD) of 12.7 (10.3) episodes of VT occurred within the 24 hours preceding randomization. Patients had recurrent VT despite taking a mean (SD) of 2.0 (0.6) antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), and 11 patients (42%) required mechanical hemodynamic support at the time of randomization. In the 24-hour period after randomization, VT recurred in 4 of 14 patients (29% [SD 47%]) in the TcMS group vs 7 of 12 patients (58% [SD 51%]) in the sham group (P = .20). In the 72-hour period after randomization, patients in the TcMS group had a mean (SD) of 4.5 (7.2) episodes of VT vs 10.7 (13.8) in the sham group (incidence rate ratio, 0.42; P < .001). Patients in the TcMS group were taking fewer AADs 24 hours after randomization compared with baseline (mean [SD], 0.9 [0.8] vs 1.8 [0.4]; P = .001), whereas there was no difference in the number of AADs taken for the sham group (mean [SD], 2.3 [0.8] vs 1.9 [0.5]; P = .20). None of the 7 patients in the TcMS group with a cardiac implantable electronic device had clinically significant effects on device function.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, findings support the potential for TcMS to safely reduce the burden of VT in the setting of VT storm in patients with and without cardiac implantable electronic devices and inform the design of future trials to further investigate this novel treatment approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04043312.

Longitudinal Electrocardiographic Assessment in the Brugada Syndrome

Background

The type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern diagnostic of Brugada syndrome (BrS) can be dynamic. Limited studies have rigorously evaluated the temporal stability of the Brugada ECG pattern.

Objective

We sought to evaluate fluctuations of the Brugada pattern in serial resting ECGs from BrS patients managed within a large health care system.

Methods

In our cohort of BrS patients with at least 2 standard, resting ECGs recorded on separate clinical encounters, we evaluated serial changes in the Brugada pattern and categorized patients into 1 of 3 groups: dynamic was defined as the presence of both type 1 and non–type 1 patterns in available ECGs; the provoked-only group was defined as having a non–type 1 Brugada pattern across resting ECGs; and the persistent group was defined as having a type 1 pattern on all ECGs. We also evaluated the clinical risk in this cohort according to the Shanghai risk score.

Results

In 72 patients with BrS (mean age 46 ± 15 years, 69% male), 828 standard, resting ECGs were recorded over a median duration of 30.2 (interquartile range 6.3–68.1) months. The dynamic group comprised 50 (69% of the cohort) patients, the provoked-only group consisted of 17 patients (24% of the cohort), and the persistent group included 5 patients. No significant differences were detected in the total number of ECGs evaluated during the follow-up period between any of the groups. Only sinus node dysfunction and a prior cardiac arrest were associated with the persistent type 1 group. The majority of patients had a low annualized risk of lethal arrhythmic events.

Conclusion

Most BrS patients have a dynamic Brugada pattern noted on longitudinal, resting ECGs. Expert consensus statements should provide clarity on the frequency of obtaining resting ECGs in patients suspected of having BrS during follow-up.

Junctional AV ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (JAVA-CRT): results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial pilot program

Introduction

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in sinus rhythm, but the data in atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. Atrio-ventricular junctional ablation (AVJA) has been proposed as a remedy. The objective was to test if AVJA results in LV end-systolic volume (ESV) reduction ≥ 15% from baseline to 6 months.

Methods

The trial was a prospective multicenter randomized trial in 26 patients with permanent AF who were randomized 1:1 to CRT-D with or without AVJA.

Results

LVESV improved similarly by at least 15% in 5/10 (50%) in the CRT-D-only arm and in 6/12 (50%) in the AVJA + CRT-D arm (OR = 1.00 [0.14, 7.21], p = 1.00). In the CRT-D-only arm, the median 6-month improvement in LVEF was 9.2%, not different from the AVJA + CRT-D arm, 8.2%. When both groups were combined, a significant increase in LVEF was observed (25.4% at baseline vs 36.2% at 6 months, p = 0.002). NYHA class from baseline to 6 months for all patients combined improved 1 class in 15 of 24 (62.5%), whereas 9 remained in the same class and 0 degraded to a worse class.

Conclusion

In patients with permanent AF, reduced LVEF, and broad QRS who were eligible for CRT, there was insufficient evidence that AVJA improved echocardiographic or clinical outcomes; the results should be interpreted in light of a smaller than planned sample size. CRT, however, seemed to be effective in the combined study cohort overall, suggesting that CRT can be reasonably deployed in patients with AF.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02946853.

Prospective long-term follow-up of silicone-polyurethane–insulated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Persistent Opioid Use After Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Procedures

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioids are a major contributor to the ongoing epidemic of persistent opioid use (POU). The incidence of POU among opioid-naïve patients after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from a national administrative claims database from 2004 to 2018 of patients undergoing CIED procedures. Adult patients were included if they were opioid-naïve during the 180-day period before the procedure and did not undergo another procedure with anesthesia in the next 180 days. POU was defined by filling an additional opioid prescription >30 days after the CIED procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 143 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 15 316 (11%) filled an opioid prescription within 14 days of surgery. Among these patients, POU occurred in 1901 (12.4%) patients 30 to 180 days after surgery. The likelihood of developing POU was increased for patients who had a history of drug abuse (odds ratio, 1.52; P=0.005), preoperative muscle relaxant (odds ratio, 1.52; P<0.001) or benzodiazepine (odds ratio, 1.23; P=0.001) use, or opioid use in the previous 5 years (OR, 1.76; P<0.0001). POU did not differ after subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator or other CIED procedures (11.1 versus 12.4%; P=0.5). In a sensitivity analysis excluding high-risk patients who were discharged to a facility or who had a history of drug abuse or previous opioid, benzodiazepine, or muscle relaxant use, 8.9% of the remaining cohort had POU. Patients prescribed >135 mg of oral morphine equivalents had a significantly increased risk of POU.

CONCLUSIONS

POU is common after CIED procedures, and 12% of patients continued to use opioids >30 days after surgery. Higher initially prescribed oral morphine equivalent doses were associated with developing POU.

Implantable loop recorder for augmenting detection of new-onset atrial fibrillation after typical atrial flutter ablation

Background

Patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation remain at risk for future development of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). Conventional monitoring (CM) techniques have shown AF incidence rates of 18%–50% in these patients.

Objectives

To evaluate whether continuous monitoring using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) would enhance AF detection in this patient population.

Methods

Veteran patients undergoing AFL ablation between 2002 and 2019 who completed at least 6 months of follow-up after the ablation procedure were included. We compared new-onset AF detection between those who underwent CM and those who received ILRs immediately following AFL ablation.

Results

A total of 217 patients (age: 66 ± 9 years; all male) participated. CM was used in 172 (79%) and ILR in 45 (21%) patients. Median follow-up duration after ablation was 4.1 years. Seventy-nine patients (36%) developed new-onset AF, which was detected by CM in 51 and ILR in 28 (30% vs 62%, respectively, P < .001). AF detection occurred at 7.7 months (IQR: 4.7–17.5) after AFL ablation in the ILR group vs 41 months (IQR: 23–72) in the CM group (P < .001). Eleven patients (5%) experienced cerebrovascular events (all in the CM group) and only 4 of these patients (36%) were on long-term anticoagulation.

Conclusion

Patients undergoing AFL ablation remain at an increased risk of developing new-onset AF, which is detected sooner and more frequently by ILR than by CM. Improving AF detection may allow optimization of rhythm management strategies and anticoagulation in this patient population.

Alert-Based ICD Follow-Up: A Model of Digitally Driven Remote Patient Monitoring

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to test whether continuous automatic remote patient monitoring (RPM) linked to centralized analytics reduces nonactionable in-person patient evaluation (IPE) but maintains detection of at-risk patients and provides actionable notifications.

BACKGROUND

Conventional ambulatory care requires frequent IPEs. Many encounters are nonactionable, and additional unscheduled IPEs occur.

METHODS

Patients receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for Class I/IIa indications were randomized (2:1) to RPM or conventional follow-up, and they were followed up for 15 months. IPEs were conducted every 3 months in the conventional care group but at 3 and 15 months with RPM. Groups were compared for patient retention, nonactionable IPEs, and discovery of at-risk patients during 1 year of exclusive RPM. Frequency and value of RPM alerts were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients enrolled (mean age 63.5 ± 12.8 years; male 71.9%; left ventricular ejection fraction 29.0 ± 10.7%; primary prevention 72.3%; n = 1450) were similar between groups (977 RPM vs. 473 conventional care). Mean follow-up durations were 407 ± 103 days for the RPM group versus 399 ± 111 days for the conventional care group (p = 0.165). Patient attrition to follow-up was 42% greater with conventional care (20.1% [87 of 431]) versus RPM (14.2% [129 of 908]; p = 0.007). Nonactionable IPEs were reduced 81% by RPM (0.7 per patient year) compared with conventional care (3.6 per patient year; p < 0.001) but event discoveries remained similar (2.9 per patient year). In RPM, alert rate was median 1 per patient (interquartile range: 0 to 3) with >50% actionability, indicating low volume but high clinical value. Unscheduled IPE was the basis for discovery of 100% of intercurrent problems in RPM and also 75% in conventional care, indicating limited value of appointment-based follow-up for problem discovery. The number of IPEs needed to discover an actionable event was 8.2 in Conventional, 4.9 in RPM, and 2.1 when alert driven (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RPM transformed ambulatory care to IPE directed to those patients with clinically actionable events when required. Filtering patient information by digitally driven remote monitoring expends fewer clinic resources while providing a greater yield of actionable interventions. (Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up [TRUST]; NCT00336284).

Stroke, Timing of Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis, and Risk of Death

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke according to the timing of an atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis, we created an inception cohort of incident stroke events and compared the risk of death between patients with stroke with (1) sinus rhythm, (2) known AF (KAF), and (3) AF diagnosed after stroke (AFDAS).

METHODS

We used the Penn AF Free study to create an inception cohort of patients with incident stroke. Mortality events were identified after linkage with the National Death Index through June 30, 2017. We also evaluated initiation of anticoagulants and antiplatelets across the study duration. Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations between stroke subtypes and death.

RESULTS

We identified 1,489 individuals who developed an incident ischemic stroke event: 985 did not develop AF at any point during the study period, 215 had KAF before stroke, 160 had AF detected ≤6 months after stroke, and 129 had AF detected >6 months after stroke. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range 1.9-6.8), 686 deaths occurred. The annualized mortality rate was 8.8% in the stroke, no AF group; 12.2% in the KAF group; 15.8% in the AFDAS ≤6 months group; and 12.7% in the AFDAS >6 months group. Patients in the AFDAS ≤6 months group had the highest independent risk of all-cause mortality even after multivariable adjustment for demographics, clinical risk factors, and the use of antithrombotic therapies (hazard ratio 1.62 [1.22-2.14]). Compared to the stroke, no AF group, those with KAF had a higher mortality risk that was rendered nonsignificant after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The AFDAS group had the highest risk of death, which was not explained by comorbidities or use of antithrombotic therapies.

Catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias following lung transplant: Electrophysiological findings and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Data on the mechanisms of atrial arrhythmias (AAs) and outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in lung transplantation (LT) patients are insufficient. We evaluated the electrophysiologic features and outcomes of CA of AAs in LT patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study of all the LT patients who underwent CA for AAs at our institution between 2004 and 2019. A total of 15 patients (43% males, age: 61 ± 10 years) with a history of LT (60% bilateral and 40% unilateral) were identified. All patients had documented organized AA on surface electrocardiogram and seven patients also had atrial fibrillation (AF; 47% with >1 clinical arrhythmia). At electrophysiological study, 19 organized AAs were documented (48% focal and 52% macro-re-entrant). Focal atrial tachycardias/flutters were targeted along the pulmonary vein (PV) anastomotic site at the left inferior PV (n = 2), ridge and carina of the left superior PV (n = 2), left atrium (LA) posterior wall (n = 3), LA roof (n = 1), and tricuspid annulus (n = 1). Macro-re-entrant AAs included cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter (n = 2), incisional LA flutter (n = 4), LA roof-dependent flutter (n = 1), and mitral annular flutter (n = 3). In patients with LA mapping (n = 13), PV reconnection on the side of the LT was found in six patients (40%, all with clinically documented AF), with a mean of 2.1 ± 0.9 PVs reconnected per patient. Patients with AF underwent successful PV isolation. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 6-86 months), 75% of patients remained free from recurrent AAs. No procedural major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

In patients with prior LT, recurrent AAs are typically associated with substrate surrounding the surgical anastomotic lines and/or chronically reconnected PVs. CA of AAs in this population is safe and effective to achieve long-term arrhythmia control.

Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias From the Left Ventricular Apex in Patients Without Ischemic Heart Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the incidence, clinical characteristics, and electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic features of LVA VA in the absence of CAD and to describe the experience with catheter ablation (CA) in this group.

BACKGROUND

The left ventricular apex (LVA) is a well-described source of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and history of apical infarction but is a rare source of VA in the absence of CAD.

METHODS

Patients referred for CA of VA at our institution were retrospectively reviewed, and those with LVA VA in the absence of CAD were identified.

RESULTS

Of 3,710 consecutive patients undergoing VA ablation, CA of LVA VA was performed in 24 patients (20 with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, 4 with premature ventricular contractions or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; 18 men; mean age: 54 ± 15 years). These cases comprised 10 of 35 (29%) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 9 of 789 (1.2%) nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 5 of 1,432 (0.4%) idiopathic VA ablation procedures. VA QRS morphology was predominantly right bundle with slurred upstroke and right superior frontal plane axis with precordial transition ≤V3. Epicardial ablation was performed in 14 of 24 (58%). After a median of 1 procedure (range 1 to 4) at this institution and median follow-up of 47 months (range 0-176), VA recurred in 1 patient (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

LVA VA in the absence of CAD is unusual and may occur in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy or, rarely, in the absence of structural heart disease. It can be recognized by characteristic ECG features. CA of LVA VA is challenging; multiple procedures, including epicardial approaches, may be required to achieve VA control over long-term follow-up.

COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Early studies suggest that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection may cause injury to cardiac myocytes and increase arrhythmia risk.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiac arrest and arrhythmias including incident atrial fibrillation (AF), bradyarrhythmias, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in a large urban population hospitalized for COVID-19. We also evaluated correlations between the presence of these arrhythmias and mortality.

METHODS

We reviewed the characteristics of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to our center over a 9-week period. Throughout hospitalization, we evaluated the incidence of cardiac arrests, arrhythmias, and inpatient mortality. We also used logistic regression to evaluate age, sex, race, body mass index, prevalent cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and intensive care unit (ICU) status as potential risk factors for each arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Among 700 patients (mean age 50 ± 18 years; 45% men; 71% African American; 11% received ICU care), there were 9 cardiac arrests, 25 incident AF events, 9 clinically significant bradyarrhythmias, and 10 NSVTs. All cardiac arrests occurred in patients admitted to the ICU. In addition, admission to the ICU was associated with incident AF (odds ratio [OR] 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-13.18) and NSVT (OR 8.92; 95% CI 1.73-46.06) after multivariable adjustment. Also, age and incident AF (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and prevalent heart failure and bradyarrhythmias (OR 9.75; 95% CI 1.95-48.65) were independently associated. Only cardiac arrests were associated with acute in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac arrests and arrhythmias are likely the consequence of systemic illness and not solely the direct effects of COVID-19 infection.

Recurrent Stroke With Rivaroxaban Compared With Aspirin According to Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation: Secondary Analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The NAVIGATE ESUS randomized clinical trial found that 15 mg of rivaroxaban per day does not reduce stroke compared with aspirin in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS); however, it substantially reduces stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective

To analyze whether rivaroxaban is associated with a reduction of recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS who have an increased risk of AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Participants were stratified by predictors of AF, including left atrial diameter, frequency of premature atrial contractions, and HAVOC score, a validated scheme using clinical features. Treatment interactions with these predictors were assessed. Participants were enrolled between December 2014 and September 2017, and analysis began March 2018.

Intervention

Rivaroxaban treatment vs aspirin.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Risk of ischemic stroke.

Results

Among 7112 patients with a mean (SD) age of 67 (9.8) years, the mean (SD) HAVOC score was 2.6 (1.8), the mean (SD) left atrial diameter was 3.8 (1.4) cm (n = 4022), and the median (interquartile range) daily frequency of premature atrial contractions was 48 (13-222). Detection of AF during follow-up increased for each tertile of HAVOC score: 2.3% (score, 0-2), 3.0% (score, 3), and 5.8% (score, >3); however, neither tertiles of the HAVOC score nor premature atrial contractions frequency impacted the association of rivaroxaban with recurrent ischemic stroke (P for interaction = .67 and .96, respectively). Atrial fibrillation annual incidence increased for each tertile of left atrial diameter (2.0%, 3.6%, and 5.2%) and for each tertile of premature atrial contractions frequency (1.3%, 2.9%, and 7.0%). Among the predefined subgroup of patients with a left atrial diameter of more than 4.6 cm (9% of overall population), the risk of ischemic stroke was lower among the rivaroxaban group (1.7% per year) compared with the aspirin group (6.5% per year) (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.94; P for interaction = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

The HAVOC score, left atrial diameter, and premature atrial contraction frequency predicted subsequent clinical AF. Rivaroxaban was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS and moderate or severe left atrial enlargement; however, this needs to be independently confirmed before influencing clinical practice.

Evaluation of Radiofrequency Ablation Irrigation Type: In Vivo Comparison of Normal Versus Half-Normal Saline Lesion Characteristics

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the impact of the type of catheter irrigant used during delivery of radiofrequency ablation.

BACKGROUND

The use of half-normal saline (HNS) as an irrigant has been suggested as a method for increasing ablation lesion size but has not been rigorously studied in the beating heart or the use of a low-flow irrigation catheter.

METHODS

Sixteen swine underwent left ventricular mapping and ablation using either normal saline (NS) (group 1: n = 9) or half-normal saline (HNS) (group 2: n = 7). All lesions were delivered using identical parameters (40 W with 10-second ramp, 30-second duration, 15 ml/min flow, and 8- to14-g target contact force). An occurrence of steam pop, catheter char, or thrombus was assessed using intracardiac echocardiography and catheter inspection following each application. Lesion depth, width, and area were measured using electronic calibers.

RESULTS

A total of 109 lesions were delivered in group 1 and 77 in group 2. There were significantly more steam pops in group 2 (32 of 77 [42%] vs. 24 of 109 [22%], respectively). The frequencies of catheter tip char were similar (group 1: 9 of 109 [8%] vs. group 2: 10 of 77 [13%]; p = 0.29). Lesion depths, widths, and areas also were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an HNS irrigant using a low-flow open irrigated ablation catheter platform results in more tissue heating due to higher radiofrequency current delivery directed to tissue, but this can lead to higher rate of steam pops. In this in vivo porcine beating-heart model, the use of HNS does not appear to significantly increase lesion size in normal myocardium despite evidence of increased radiofrequency heating.

QRS morphology in lead V1 for the rapid localization of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the left ventricular papillary muscles: A novel electrocardiographic criterion

BACKGROUND

Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria have been developed to identify idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the left ventricular (LV) papillary muscles (PAPs), but accurate localization remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop ECG criteria for accurate localization of LV PAP VAs using lead V₁ exclusively.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing mapping and ablation of VAs from the LV PAPs guided by intracardiac echocardiography from 2007 to 2018 were reviewed (study group). The QRS morphology in lead V₁ was compared to patients with VAs with a "right bundle branch block" morphology from other LV locations (reference group). Patients with structural heart disease were excluded.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven patients with LV PAP VAs (mean age 54 ± 16 years; 65% men) were identified, including 64 (55%) from the posteromedial PAP and 47 (42%) from the anterolateral PAP. The reference group included patients with VAs from the following LV locations: fascicles (n = 21), outflow tract (n = 36), ostium (n = 37), inferobasal segment (n = 12), and apex (5). PAP VAs showed 3 distinct QRS morphologies in lead V₁ 93% of the time: Rr (53%), R with a slurred downslope (29%), and RR (11%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the 3 morphologies combined are 93%, 98%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. The intrinsicoid deflection of PAP VAs in lead V₁ was shorter than that of the reference group (63 ± 13 ms vs 79 ± 24 ms; P < .001). An intrinsicoid deflection time of <74 ms best differentiated the 2 groups (sensitivity 79%; specificity 87%).

CONCLUSION

VAs originating from the LV PAPs manifest unique QRS morphologies in lead V₁, which can aid in rapid and accurate localization.

Impact of a nurse-led limited risk factor modification program on arrhythmia outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of a nurse-led risk factor modification (RFM) program for improving weight loss and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) care among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

We now report its impact on arrhythmia outcomes in a subgroup of patients undergoing catheter ablation.

METHODS

Participating patients with obesity and/or need for OSA management (high risk per Berlin Questionnaire or untreated OSA) underwent in-person consultation and monthly telephone calls with the nurse for up to 1 year. Arrhythmias were assessed by office ECGs and ≥2 wearable monitors. Outcomes, defined as Arrhythmia control (0-6 self-terminating recurrences, with ≤1 cardioversion for nonparoxysmal AF) and Freedom from arrhythmias (no recurrences on or off antiarrhythmic drugs), were compared at 1 year between patients undergoing catheter ablation who enrolled and declined RFM.

RESULTS

Between 1 November 2016 and 1 April 2018, 195 patients enrolled and 196 declined RFM (body mass index, 35.1 ± 6.7 vs 34.3 ± 6.3 kg/m² ; 50% vs 50% paroxysmal AF; P = NS). At 1 year, enrolled patients demonstrated significant weight loss (4.7% ± 5.3% vs 0.3% ± 4.4% in declined patients; P < .0001) and improved OSA care (78% [n = 43] of patients diagnosed with OSA began treatment). However, outcomes were similar between enrolled and declined patients undergoing ablation (arrhythmia control in 80% [n = 48] vs 79% [n = 38]; freedom from arrhythmia in 58% [n = 35] vs 71% [n = 34]; P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Despite improving weight loss and OSA care, our nurse-led RFM program did not impact 1-year arrhythmia outcomes in patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation.

Characterization of Structural Changes in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy With Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Ablation: Insights From Repeat Electroanatomic Voltage Mapping

BACKGROUND

Data characterizing structural changes of arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy are limited.

METHODS

Patients presenting with left bundle branch block ventricular tachycardia in the setting of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy with procedures separated by at least 9 months were included.

RESULTS

Nineteen consecutive patients (84% males; mean age 39±15 years [range, 20-76 years]) were included. All 19 patients underwent 2 detailed sinus rhythm electroanatomic endocardial voltage maps (average 385±177 points per map; range, 93-847 points). Time interval between the initial and repeat ablation procedures was mean 50±37 months (range, 9-162). No significant progression of voltage was observed (bipolar: 38 cm² [interquartile range (IQR), 25-54] versus 53 cm² [IQR, 25-65], P=0.09; unipolar: 116 cm² [IQR, 61-209] versus 159 cm² [IQR, 73-204], P=0.36) for the entire study group. There was a significant increase in RV volumes (percentage increase, 28%; 206 mL [IQR, 170-253] versus 263 mL [IQR, 204-294], P<0.001) for the entire study population. Larger scars at baseline but not changes over time were associated with a significant increase in RV volume (bipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.6965, P=0.006; unipolar: Spearman ρ, 0.5743, P=0.03). Most patients with progressive RV dilatation (8/14, 57%) had moderate (2 patients) or severe (6 patients) tricuspid regurgitation recorded at either initial or repeat ablation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, >10% increase in RV endocardial surface area of bipolar voltage consistent with scar is uncommon during the intermediate term. Most recurrent ventricular tachycardias are localized to regions of prior defined scar. Voltage indexed scar area at baseline but not changes in scar over time is associated with progressive increase in RV size and is consistent with adverse remodeling but not scar progression. Marked tricuspid regurgitation is frequently present in patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy who have progressive RV dilation.

A Nurse-Led Limited Risk Factor Modification Program to Address Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Background

Obesity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet these conditions remain inadequately treated. We report on the feasibility and efficacy of a nurse‐led risk factor modification program utilizing a pragmatic approach to address obesity and OSA in AF patients.

Methods and Results

AF patients with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) and/or the need for OSA management (high risk per Berlin Questionnaire or untreated OSA) were voluntarily enrolled for risk factor modification, which comprised patient education, lifestyle modification, coordination with specialists, and longitudinal management. Weight loss and OSA treatment were monitored by monthly follow‐up calls and/or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) unit downloads. Quality of life and arrhythmia symptoms were assessed with the SF‐36 and AF Severity Scale at baseline and at 6 months. From November 1, 2016 to October 31, 2017, 252 patients (age 63±11 years; 71% male; 57% paroxysmal AF) were enrolled, 189 for obesity and 93 for OSA. Obese patients who enrolled lost significantly greater percent body weight than those who declined (3% versus 0.3%; P<0.05). Among 93 patients enrolled for OSA, 70 completed sleep studies, OSA was confirmed in 50, and the majority (76%) started CPAP therapy. All components of quality of life and arrhythmia symptoms improved significantly from baseline to 6 months among enrolled patients.

Conclusions

A nurse‐led risk factor modification program is a potentially sustainable and generalizable model that can improve weight loss and OSA in AF patients, translating into improved quality of life and arrhythmia symptoms.