The long-acting β-adrenergic agonist controversy in asthma: troublesome times!

Routine Use of Budesonide/Formoterol Fixed Dose Combination in Elderly Asthmatic Patients: Practical Considerations

Asthma has been demonstrated to be as common in the elderly as in younger age groups. Although no specific recommendations exist to manage the disease differently in older individuals, functional features and clinical presentations may be affected by age per se, and by age-related conditions, such as comorbidities and polypharmacy. In this review article, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety in elderly asthmatic patients of one of the most currently used inhaled treatments for asthma, that is, the fixed-dose combination of budesonide/formoterol. We attempted to address some practical questions that are relevant to the daily practice of clinicians. We focused on the efficacy and real-world effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-adrenergic bronchodilators (ICS/LABA) as treatment in the elderly population, since data are extrapolated from younger populations. We investigated whether a maintenance and reliever therapy approach is more effective in the elderly as opposed to maintenance regimens, from both the general practitioner's and the pulmonologist's perspective. To address these questions, we scanned electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar) from the date of inception up to October 2016 with a cross-search using the following keywords: 'asthma', 'elderly', 'SMART therapy', 'MART therapy', 'Turbuhaler', and 'budesonide/formoterol'. The available literature on the topic confirms that when the age-associated changes are properly managed in clinical practice, asthma in older populations can be optimally controlled with inhaled treatment including ICS/LABA. This also applies for the budesonide/formoterol fixed combination, thus allowing for the maintenance and reliever therapy approach.

Concerns with beta2-agonists in pediatric asthma - a clinical perspective

Beta2-adrenoreceptor agonists (β2-agonists) are extensively used in the treatment of childhood asthma. However, there have been concerns regarding their adverse effects and safety. In 2005, the FDA commissioned a "Black Box Warning" communicating the potential for an increased risk for serious asthma exacerbations or asthma related deaths, with the regular use of LABAs. In a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials, the incidence of severe adverse events appeared to be highest in the 4-11 year age group. Several mechanisms have been proposed regarding the risk of regular use of β2-agonists, such as masking patients' perception of worsening asthma, desensitization and downregulation of the β2-adrenoreceptor, pro-inflammatory effects of β2-agonists, pharmacogenetic effects of β2-adrenoreceptor polymorphisms and age related differences in pathophysiology of asthma. In this paper, we review β2-receptor pharmacology, discuss the concerns regarding treatment with β2-agonists in childhood asthma, and provide suggestions for clinical pediatric practice in the light of current literature.

Changes in long-acting β-agonist utilization after the FDA's 2010 drug safety communication

PURPOSE

In February 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued new recommendations for the safe use of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) in patients with asthma. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the FDA's 2010 safety advisory on LABA utilization.

METHODS

Using administrative data from the Oregon Medicaid program, we performed an interrupted time series regression to evaluate changes in the trend in new LABA prescriptions before and after the FDA's 2010 advisory. Trends in incident fills were examined among those with and without an asthma diagnosis code and previous respiratory controller medication use; trends were also assessed according to patient age.

FINDINGS

The average age of the 8646 study patients was 37 years, 53% had a diagnosis of asthma, 21% had no respiratory diagnosis, and 32% had not used a respiratory controller medication in the recent past. The trend in new LABA prescriptions declined by 0.09 new start per 10,000 patients per month (95% CI, -0.19 to -0.01) after the FDA's advisory. Among those with a diagnosis of asthma, there was an immediate drop of 0.48 (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.03) and a 0.10 (95% CI, -0.13 to -0.06) decline in the monthly rate of new starts per 10,000 patients. Immediately after the FDA's advisory, we observed a statistically significant 4.7% increase (95% CI, 0.8 to 8.7) in the proportion of new LABA starts with history of previous respiratory controller medication use. Utilization of LABAs did not change in those without a diagnosis of asthma.

IMPLICATIONS

The FDA's 2010 advisory was associated with modest reductions in LABA utilization overall and in ways highlighted in their recommendations.

Advances in adult asthma diagnosis and treatment in 2012: potential therapeutics and gene-environment interactions

In the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in 2012, research reports related to asthma in adults clustered around mechanisms of disease, with a special focus on their potential for informing new therapies. There was also consideration of the effect of the environment on health from pollution, climate change, and epigenetic influences, underlining the importance of understanding gene-environment interactions in the pathogenesis of asthma and response to treatment.

Advances in pediatric asthma in 2012: moving toward asthma prevention

Last year's "Advances in pediatric asthma: moving forward" concluded the following: "Now is also the time to utilize information recorded in electronic medical records to develop innovative disease management plans that will track asthma over time and enable timely decisions on interventions in order to maintain control that can lead to disease remission and prevention." This year's summary will focus on recent advances in pediatric asthma on modifying disease activity, preventing asthma exacerbations, managing severe asthma, and risk factors for predicting and managing early asthma, as indicated in Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology publications in 2012. Recent reports continue to shed light on methods to improve asthma management through steps to assess disease activity, tools to standardize outcome measures in asthma, genetic markers that predict risk for asthma and appropriate treatment, and interventions that alter the early presentation of asthma to prevent progression. We are well on our way to creating a pathway around wellness in asthma care and also to use new tools to predict the risk for asthma and take steps to not only prevent asthma exacerbations but also to prevent the early manifestations of the disease and thus prevent its evolution to severe asthma.