Effects of combination treatment with tezepelumab and allergen immunotherapy on nasal responses to allergen: A randomized controlled trial

Recent Studies and Prospects of Biologics in Allergic Rhinitis Treatment

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common and increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory disorder of the nasal mucosa that severely impacts patients' quality of life, causing symptoms like nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching. AR is primarily mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE) when allergens are present, making it challenging to manage despite available therapies like pharmacotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. Recently, research has focused on biologics as an emerging therapeutic option for AR. Biologics target specific immune pathways in type 2 inflammation, which underlies many allergic diseases including AR. Biologics offer a targeted and potentially more effective alternative to traditional therapies, addressing the underlying immune mechanisms rather than simply alleviating symptoms. Based on key clinical trial evidence, this paper tentatively proposes a multidimensional strategy for selecting biologics in AR, integrating serum IgE levels, disease phenotypes (seasonal/persistent), and comorbid characteristics to guide individualized treatment. However, the long-term cost-effectiveness, optimal dosing regimens, and patient adherence to biologics require further validation through real-world data. Despite these challenges, recent advancements in biologics represent a promising step forward in AR management. With ongoing research and clinical trials, biologics may soon provide more effective and lasting relief for patients suffering from allergic rhinitis.

Allergen Immunotherapy: Pitfalls, Perks and Unexpected Allies

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a well-established treatment aimed at reducing allergen sensitivity by gradually exposing the immune system to increasing doses of allergens. This promotes desensitization and immune tolerance through multiple mechanisms. AIT offers long-term immune modulation and is considered a potentially curative certain forms of allergic diseases. Altered antibody responses is a key mechanism of AIT in the production of allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies, which act as blocking antibodies to prevent allergen binding to IgE on mast cells (MCs) and basophils. However, IgG4 responses are sometimes ineffective due to variations in antibody affinity and epitope targeting. Reverse class switching from IgE to IgG4 and selective depletion of IgE-producing B cells represent potential strategies to improve AIT efficacy. Tregs play a central role in AIT by suppressing Th2-driven allergic responses and promoting immune tolerance through anti-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β. However, genetic and environmental factors may impair Treg function, leading to AIT failure. AIT reduces MC and basophil activation, leading to long-term suppression of allergic inflammation. It modulates IgE-FcεRI interactions and cytokine signaling pathways, but in some cases, anaphylactic reactions or resistance to MC desensitization may occur. Discussion and conclusions: While AIT is a highly effective allergy treatment, variability in immune responses can impact its success. Advances in biologic therapies offer potential synergies with AIT. Understanding these interactions will help refine AIT strategies and improve patient outcomes.

Targeting alarmins in asthma: From bench to clinic

Over the past 2 decades, mechanistic studies of allergic and type 2 (T2)-mediated airway inflammation have led to multiple approved therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma. The approval and availability of these monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE, a T2 cytokine (IL-5) and/or cytokine receptors (IL-5Rα, IL-4Rα) has been central to the progresses made in the management of moderate-to-severe asthma over this period. However, there are persistent gaps in clinician's ability to provide precise care, given that many patients with T2-high asthma do not respond to IgE- or T2 cytokine-targeting therapies and that patients with T2-low asthma have few therapeutic options. The new frontier of precision medicine in asthma, as well as in other allergic diseases, includes the targeting of epithelium-derived cytokines known as alarmins, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-25, IL-33, and their receptors. The effects of these alarmins, which can act upstream of immune cells, involve both the innate and adaptive systems and hold potential for the treatment of both T2-high and -low disease. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin antibody, has already been approved for the treatment of severe asthma. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of alarmin biology with a primary focus on allergic airway diseases. We link the mechanistic corollaries to the clinical implications and advances in drug development targeting alarmins, with a particular focus on currently approved treatments, those under study, and future potential targets in alarmin signaling pathways.

The combination of allergen immunotherapy and biologics for inhalant allergies: Exploring the synergy

The development of monoclonal antibodies that selectively target IgE and type 2 immunity has opened new possibilities in the treatment of allergies. Although they have been used mainly as single therapies found to have efficacy in the management of asthma and other T2-mediated diseases, there is a growing interest in using these monoclonal antibodies in combination with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT has transformed the treatment of allergic diseases by aiming to modify the underlying immune response to allergens rather than just providing temporary symptom relief. Despite the proven efficacy and safety of AIT, unmet needs call for further research and innovation. Combination strategies involving biologics and AIT exhibit potential in improving short-term efficacy, reducing adverse events, and increasing immunologic tolerance. Anti-IgE emerges as the most promising therapeutic strategy, not only enhancing AIT's safety and tolerability but also providing additional evidence of efficacy compared with AIT alone. Anti-interleukin-4 receptor offers a reduction in adverse effects and an improved immunologic profile when combined with AIT; however, its impact on short-term efficacy seems limited. The combination of cat dander subcutaneous immunotherapy with anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin was synergistic with enhanced efficacy and altered immune responses that persisted for 1 year after discontinuation compared with AIT alone. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained benefits and safety profiles of combination strategies.

Promoting Prevention and Targeting Remission of Asthma: A EUFOREA Consensus Statement on Raising the Bar in Asthma Care

Asthma is a common, multifaceted respiratory disease with a major impact on quality of life. Despite increased insights into mechanisms underlying various asthma phenotypes and endotypes and the availability of targeted biologic treatment options, the disease remains uncontrolled in a substantial proportion of patients with risk of exacerbations, requiring systemic corticosteroids, and with progressive disease. Current international guidelines advocate for a personalized management approach to patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) asthma expert panel was convened to discuss strategies to optimize asthma care and to prevent systemic corticosteroid overuse and disease progression. In this meeting report, we summarize current concepts and recommendations and provide a rationale to implement personalized asthma management at earlier stages of the disease. The ultimate goal is to move away from the current one-size-fits-most concept, which focuses on a symptom-driven treatment strategy, and shift toward a phenotype- and endotype-targeted approach aimed at curbing the disease course by improving clinical outcomes and preserving health-related quality of life. Herein, we provide a consensus view on asthma care that advocates a holistic approach and highlight some unmet needs to be addressed in future clinical trials and population studies.

Changes of Clinical Practice Patterns of Allergen Immunotherapy in Korea

This study aimed to identify recent changes of AIT treatment behaviors in real-world clinical practice using a questionnaire survey in Korea. The questionnaire on AIT prescriptions and practical experiences was distributed to all members of the Korean Academy of Asthma Allergy and Clinical Immunology in June 2022. The responses were analyzed and compared with the results from 2009 and 2017. In total, 115 responses (10.1%) were collected; 58 (50.4%) from internal medicine, 34 (29.6%) from pediatricians, and 21 (18.3%) from otolaryngologists. The prescription rate for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was 53.8%, showing a decrease from those in 2009 and 2017; however, that for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) increased steadily, reaching 17.9% in 2009, 40.3% in 2017, and 46.2% in 2022. The prescription rates for asthma and atopic dermatitis increased by 4.6% and 7.9%, respectively. The most frequently prescribed allergens for SCIT in 2022 were house dust mites (32.9%), pollen (30.6%), and animal dander (28.2%), with the rate for animal dander showing a significant increase from 10.3% in 2009. Most physicians (93%) used mixed allergens for SCIT, with 42.8% using a combination of 5 or more allergens. Fifty-eight (67.4%) respondents reported cases of anaphylaxis during SCIT and 36.2% reported systemic adverse reactions during SLIT. In conclusion, SLIT prescriptions, AIT for asthma and atopic dermatitis, and AIT with animal dander increased significantly from 2009 to 2022. Serial surveys of AIT practices are helpful in identifying the changes of real-world clinical practice of AIT.

Advances in Allergen Immunotherapy and Safety

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) modifies immune responses to treat allergies. AIT treatment is a 3-month to 3-year long-term strategy, and its potential candidates are allergic rhinitis and asthma, food allergy, and insect venom allergy. AIT can be administered through specific routes recognized for allergy treatment strategies. A considerable body of knowledge about AIT is available, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the first peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). The AIT effective type for other allergens and the route of administration are a real challenge. This paper reviews published literature on AIT mechanisms, administration routes, and safety.

Tezepelumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria: Results of the phase 2b INCEPTION study

BACKGROUND

Tezepelumab, an mAb inhibiting thymic stromal lymphopoietin, is an upstream-targeted therapy with potential to inhibit multiple pathways in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate tezepelumab efficacy and safety in patients with CSU despite treatment with second-generation H1 antihistamines.

METHODS

This phase 2b study randomized 183 patients (125 anti-IgE therapy-naive; 58 anti-IgE therapy-experienced) to placebo every 2 weeks, tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 weeks, tezepelumab 420 mg every 2 weeks, or omalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (anti-IgE-naive only) for 16-week treatment. The primary end point was change from baseline in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 16. Safety and exploratory end points were evaluated through week 32.

RESULTS

The 16-week primary end point was not met. In the overall population, tezepelumab 210 mg and 420 mg did not significantly improve UAS7 versus placebo (least squares mean [SE]: -13.5 [1.6] and -14.7 [1.5], respectively, vs -13.6 [1.6], P = .99, nominal and P = .60, nominal, respectively). Greater improvement in UAS7 versus placebo was observed in the anti-IgE-naive tezepelumab-treated populations (nominal significance); a trend toward significance was observed with omalizumab. In the anti-IgE-naive population, there was delayed, sustained, 32-week off-treatment improvement in UAS7 versus placebo with tezepelumab 210 mg (nominally significant) and 420 mg (trend), but not with omalizumab. This effect was larger in patients with lower baseline IgE levels and longer CSU duration and accompanied sustained IL-5 and IL-13 reductions. Tezepelumab and placebo safety findings were balanced.

CONCLUSION

Although the 16-week primary end point was not met, tezepelumab showed post-treatment reductions in CSU activity through week 32, suggesting a delayed, sustained, thymic stromal lymphopoietin blockade treatment effect.

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin signaling in B cells from progenitors to plasma cells

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is an established pleotropic alarmin cytokine that is generated at barrier tissues to induce type 2 immune responses, but its role in regulating the diversity of B cells is poorly understood. Here, we will highlight the key findings that underpin our limited understanding of the role thymic stromal lymphopoietin in modulating different stages of B cell development. We will also provide an overview of how thymic stromal lymphopoietin drives B cell-mediated immune disease and how novel thymic stromal lymphopoietin-blocking biologics could be used to modulate B cell responses. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is critical for the regulation, diversity, and longevity of humoral immunity.

Advances in Biologic Therapies for Allergic Diseases: Current Trends, Emerging Agents, and Future Perspectives

Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of severe allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD), chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), and allergic rhinitis (AR). These molecularly targeted agents provide significant benefits for patients unresponsive to conventional treatments by addressing underlying immune mechanisms, particularly type 2 inflammation driven by cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Recent advancements include biologics targeting alarmins like thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and IL-33, which may address both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation, broadening their therapeutic scope. Despite their effectiveness, biologics remain expensive, posing socioeconomic challenges, and there are concerns regarding long-term safety and inter-individual variability in responses. Promising innovations such as bispecific antibodies and ultra-long-acting agents are under investigation, alongside digital health tools like remote biomarker monitoring and AI-driven decision support systems, which aim to enhance personalized care. However, disparities in access, particularly for underserved populations, underscore the need for policy reforms and affordable biosimilars. This review synthesizes recent findings and emerging trends, highlighting the evolving role of biologics in transforming allergic disease management and offering insights into future research directions.

The benefits of septoplasty for patients with deviated nasal septum and allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The value of endoscopic septoplasty for patients with deviated nasal septum and allergic rhinitis has not been systematically summarized. This study aims to assess the impact of surgical intervention on quality of life through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, CNKI, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for studies on the treatment of patients with deviated nasal septum and allergic rhinitis up to 2024. Studies that were duplicates, lacked full text, had incomplete data, or involved animal experiments, commentaries, or systematic reviews were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0.

RESULTS

The total nasal symptom score (TNSS) in patients who received endoscopic surgery was considerably reduced compared to those treated with spray therapy alone, indicating a significant improvement (SMD = -21.29, 95% CI: -26.26, -116.33). Classic symptoms of allergic rhinitis, including rhinorrhea (SMD=-9.97, 95% CI: -16.97, -2.98), nasal obstruction (SMD=-27.25, 95% CI: -41.12, -13.38), nasal itching (SMD=-10.32, 95% CI: -13.16, -7.48), and sneezing (SMD=-12.66, 95% CI: -14.99, -10.34), showed significant improvement. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two treatments (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.49, 2.10).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a deviated nasal septum and allergic rhinitis benefit more from septoplasty. However, the procedure should be performed cautiously by experienced clinicians, taking into account the specific condition of the nasal septum.

Novel Approaches to Allergen Immunotherapy for Respiratory Allergies

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains the cornerstone for managing respiratory allergies, offering long-term symptom relief, disease modification, and prevention of disease progression. While novel approaches like intralymphatic and epicutaneous immunotherapy and the combination of allergens with adjuvants show promise, traditional methods remain effective and safe. Hypoallergenic T-cell peptide vaccines and recombinant allergens require further research to confirm their clinical benefits. Passive immunotherapy, while demonstrating effectiveness in specific cases, needs exploration of its long-term efficacy and broader applicability. Combining AIT with biologics may enhance safety and treatment outcomes. Despite emerging innovations, allergen-specific immunotherapy with natural allergen extracts remains the primary disease-modifying treatment, offering long-term symptom relief and prevention of disease progression. Continued research is essential to refine and optimize allergen immunotherapy strategies, providing patients with more effective and personalized treatment options.

Recent developments in immunotherapy approaches for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) poses a significant global health burden, with the potential to progress to asthma, thereby impacting patients' quality of life. Immunotherapy has demonstrated effectiveness in mitigating clinical symptoms by altering the underlying disease mechanisms of AR. This article provides a thorough review of the current state of immunotherapy for AR, encompassing various facets of immunotherapeutic strategies, elucidating their mechanisms and clinical implications. By presenting a nuanced understanding of the present landscape of immunotherapy for AR, this review aims to serve as a valuable reference for informing clinical treatment strategies. The subsequent analysis of diverse immunotherapeutic pathways offers a comprehensive understanding of their mechanisms and clinical implications. A meticulous examination is conducted on subcutaneous immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, oral immunotherapy, intralymphatic immunotherapy, and innovative intravenous gold-induced autologous serum injection therapy. Each pathway is systematically elucidated, with its distinctive features and potential contributions to managing AR emphasized. In conclusion, synthesizing epidemiological insights, immunotherapeutic nuances, and pathway-specific analyses encapsulates a profound understanding of immunotherapy for AR.

Positioning tezepelumab for patients with severe asthma: from evidence to unmet needs

Several endotypes of severe asthma with predominantly type 2 inflammation can be distinguished by the immune pathways driving the inflammatory processes. However, in the absence of type 2 inflammation, asthma is less clearly defined and is generally associated with poor responses to conventional anti-asthmatic therapies. Studies have shown that disruption of the epithelial barrier triggers inflammatory responses and increases epithelial permeability. A key aspect of this process is that epithelial cells release alarmin cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-25, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), in response to allergens and infections. Among these cytokines, TSLP has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for severe asthma, leading to the development of a new biologic, tezepelumab (TZP). By blocking TSLP, TZP may produce wide-ranging effects. Based on positive clinical trial results, TZP appears to offer a promising, safe, and effective treatment approach. This narrative review examines the evidence for treating severe asthma with TZP, analyses clinical trial findings, and provides clinicians with practical insights into identifying patients who may respond best to this novel biologic therapy.

[Efficacy of biologics for severe asthma on allergic comorbidities]

Identification of therapeutic targets other than asthma can guide the choice of biologics in cases of severe asthma. Some of the allergic diseases (atopic dermatitis, food allergies, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis) that may be associated with asthma can be treated with biologics. In this review, we aim to assess the effectiveness of these biologic therapies on the allergic comorbidities of asthma. In the treatment of atopic dermatitis, only Dupilumab, an anti-IL4Rα, has proven its effectiveness and has received reimbursement authorization for this indication. In patients presenting with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, Omalizumab has shown effectiveness, but has not been approved for this indication. Data from post-hoc analyses of studies on severe asthma likewise suggest the effectiveness of Dupilumab regarding allergic rhinitis. While these two biologic therapies have shown positive signals, inducing oral food tolerance, the relevant data are not robust. Biologic therapies targeting IL-5 or its receptor (Mepolizumab, Benralizumab) have seldom been evaluated in allergic comorbidities, excepting atopic dermatitis, for which their effectiveness has not been proven. Lastly, there are interesting data on the combination of biologic therapy and allergen immunotherapy in cases of allergic rhinitis and food allergies, but they need to be confirmed by randomized studies.

Combined Dupilumab and Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in Severe Refractory Atopic Dermatitis

Although combining allergen immunotherapy with biologics has shown promise in treating atopic diseases such as asthma and allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis (AD) remains notably underexplored in this context. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combining dupilumab with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for severe AD refractory to standard treatments. This was a single-center retrospective analysis assessing patients with severe AD treated with combined dupilumab and SCIT, dupilumab, or SCIT alone at the Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. The inclusion criteria encompassed severe AD diagnosis, specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels to house dust mite allergens, and treatment follow-up for at least 18 months. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, serum biomarker levels, and adverse event records were regularly collected. Forty-eight patients with AD were analyzed, showing significant improvement in EASI scores and favorable changes in serum biomarkers over 144 weeks. The combination therapy led to a sustained reduction in AD severity, a significant reduction in total IgE and specific IgE levels, and an increment in allergen-specific IgG4. All patients experienced only mild and temporary side effects, not requiring treatment discontinuation. Combining dupilumab with SCIT offers a promising therapeutic option for patients with severe, treatment-refractory AD, reducing disease severity and inducing favorable immunological changes without increasing adverse effects.

Eosinophilic esophagitis and inhalant antigens: Pointing out the roles of allergic rhinitis, immunotherapy and biologic treatment

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and allergic rhinitis (AR) usually represent the latest manifestations of the atopic march, sharing a common type 2 inflammation response. A relevant prevalence of AR in EoE cohorts has been widely confirmed. An increasing literature assessed the involvement of aeroantigens in EoE pathogenesis, focusing foremost on the seasonality of new diagnoses, symptoms, and response to therapy. Unfortunately, no diriment direction has been achieved, probably due to the retrospective design of the studies so far available, which chose surrogate markers of EoE activity (mostly the date of new diagnosis) which may be affected by geographical, logistic and personal factors, probably not dependent by the disease itself. EoE exacerbations reported in the context of the pollen levels (preferably pollen counts) may represent a more reliable marker. AR might promote the onset and the re-exacerbation of EoE through mechanisms that are both local (ie, massive exposure to airborne antigens mediated by post-nasal drip) and systemic (type 2 inflammation). Furthermore, AR may facilitate EoE onset by predisposing to pollen food allergic syndrome (PFAS), and EoE patients with PFAS reported higher rate of AR, thus suggesting a bond among these 3 conditions whose causative relationship have still to be ascertained. In addition, because of its shifting activity from Th2 to Th1 inflammation, several case reports focused on the effect of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) employed to treat AR in EoE patients. Also in this instance, no certainties could be guaranteed, although sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is more frequently reported to exacerbate EoE, while SCIT is mostly described as a remission adjuvant. The real life experience reported from our allergy service appears to confirm such hypothesis. Finally, a watchful eye should be reserved to monoclonal antibodies as a potential future option for concomitant EoE and AR. In light of all this, an attentive evaluation of allergic history of EoE patients should be relevant. Future perspectives should be addressed on prospective studies targeted to shed light on causative relations among airborne antigens, AR and EoE, and to viable comprehensive treatments.

Allergies to Allergens from Cats and Dogs: A Review and Update on Sources, Pathogenesis, and Strategies

Inhalation allergies caused by cats and dogs can lead to a range of discomforting symptoms, such as rhinitis and asthma, in humans. With the increasing popularity of and care provided to these companion animals, the allergens they produce pose a growing threat to susceptible patients' health. Allergens from cats and dogs have emerged as significant risk factors for triggering asthma and allergic rhinitis worldwide; however, there remains a lack of systematic measures aimed at assisting individuals in recognizing and preventing allergies caused by these animals. This review provides comprehensive insights into the classification of cat and dog allergens, along with their pathogenic mechanisms. This study also discusses implementation strategies for prevention and control measures, including physical methods, gene-editing technology, and immunological approaches, as well as potential strategies for enhancing allergen immunotherapy combined with immunoinformatics. Finally, it presents future prospects for the prevention and treatment of human allergies caused by cats and dogs. This review will improve knowledge regarding allergies to cats and dogs while providing insights into potential targets for the development of next-generation treatments.

Biomarkers and clinical outcomes after tezepelumab cessation: Extended follow-up from the 2-year DESTINATION study

BACKGROUND

Long-term tezepelumab treatment in the DESTINATION study (NCT03706079) resulted in reduced asthma exacerbations, reduced biomarker levels, and improved lung function and symptom control in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the time course of changes in biomarkers and clinical manifestations after treatment cessation after 2 years of tezepelumab treatment.

METHODS

DESTINATION was a 2-year, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of tezepelumab treatment in patients (12-80 years old) with severe asthma. Patients received their last treatment doses at week 100 and could enroll in an extended follow-up period from weeks 104 to 140. Change over time in key biomarkers and clinical outcomes were assessed in tezepelumab vs placebo recipients for 40 weeks after stopping treatment.

RESULTS

Of 569 patients enrolled in the extended follow-up period, 426 were included in the analysis (289 received tezepelumab and 137 placebo). In the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose, blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 scores gradually increased from weeks 4 to 10, with a gradual reduction in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second such that blood eosinophil counts, fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, and clinical outcomes returned to placebo levels; however, none of these outcomes returned to baseline levels. Total IgE levels increased later from week 28 and remained well below placebo and baseline levels during the 40-week period after the last tezepelumab dose.

CONCLUSION

This analysis reveals the benefits of continued tezepelumab treatment in the management of patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma, compared with stopping treatment after 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03706079.

A pediatric randomized, controlled trial of German cockroach subcutaneous immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT.

METHODS

Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal transcriptomic responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed.

RESULTS

Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (P = .63). Nasal transcriptomic responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (P = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG4 was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (P < .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (P = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ.

CONCLUSIONS

A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG4 serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.

Current Management of Allergic Rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common allergic disease worldwide and one of the most common chronic diseases in general. Allergic rhinitis is caused by inhalant allergens from outdoor and indoor environments with varying significance of different allergens in global regions. We provide options for the current management for AR including pharmacological treatments and nonpharmacological options and allergen immunotherapy (AIT). A literature review has been conducted in Medline, Pubmed, as well as the national and international study (ClinicalTrials.gov) and guideline registers and the Cochrane Library. Human studies published on the topic in the period up to and including November 2023 were taken into account. Allergen avoidance measures, pharmacotherapy, and AIT are the cornerstones of AR treatment. Nonpharmacological measures and behavioral recommendations should be adequately added. Tools of precision medicine are already playing a significant role and will be part of the diagnostic and therapeutic standard in the future. Patients benefit most in a network of different pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment measures including AIT. Application of precision medicine tools for diagnosis and treatment will improve standards of care.

New biologics for food allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore role of emerging biologics, including ligelizumab, UB-221, dupilumab, and antialarmins, in food allergy management. With a focus on recent developments, we evaluate their promise in mitigating adverse events during oral immunotherapy (OIT), reducing allergic reactions, and addressing the limitations of current therapeutic options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiimmunoglobulin E mAbs, exemplified by omalizumab, demonstrate efficacy in desensitization and safety improvement during multiallergen OIT. Next-generation antibodies like ligelizumab and UB-221 exhibit enhanced potency and unique mechanisms, holding promise for food allergy treatment. Dupilumab, targeting IL-4 receptor alpha, presents potential benefits in decreasing allergen-specific IgE and modifying the atopic march. Exploration of antialarmins, specifically anti-IL-33 (etokimab) and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab), reveals encouraging results, with etokimab showing early success in peanut allergy trials.

SUMMARY

Biologics hold promising potential for food allergy treatment. Tailoring therapeutic approaches based on shared decision-making becomes pivotal. While omalizumab remains a significant option, next-generation anti-IgE antibodies and agents targeting alarmins exhibit unique strengths. Dupilumab, despite limited success as monotherapy, shows promise as an adjunct for OIT. Careful consideration of treatment goals, patient preferences, and the evolving landscape of biologics will shape future clinical practice, offering allergists an expanded toolbox for personalized food allergy management.

Proof-of-concept study of anti-Fel d 1 IgY antibodies in cat food using the MASK-air® app

BACKGROUND

An innovation to better manage cat-allergic patients utilises anti-Fel d 1 IgY antibodies to neutralise Fel d 1 after its production by the cat. However, there is no published study showing its clinical efficacy in humans in a home setting. A longitudinal, open-label, proof-of-concept study was carried out to approach clinical efficacy of the cat food in cat-allergic patients.

METHODS

After a baseline evaluation, the cats ate only the cat food for the following 4 months. Daily evaluation of efficacy was performed for 2 weeks at baseline and after 1, 2 and 3 months of intervention for periods of 2 weeks. The MASK-air app was used daily to assess symptoms, work productivity and medications.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients screened, 42 were followed up and 33 (78.5%) reported MASK-air data at all 3 evaluation periods. The primary end point (visual analogue scale [VAS] for global allergy symptoms) was significantly improved (p < 0.0001). All symptoms (VAS nose, eye, and asthma), VAS work and the combined symptom-medication score significantly improved after 1 month. The percentage of uncontrolled days (VAS>20/100) decreased from 64% at baseline to 35% at 1 month (p < 0.0001) and 14% at 3 months. A sensitivity analysis in patients with uncontrolled disease at baseline found similar results.

DISCUSSION

A cat diet containing anti-Fel d 1 antibodies was able to (i) show decreased allergic symptoms and related outcomes, (ii) inform the design and feasibility of future studies with a control arm and (iii) estimate the sample size of the study.

STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05656482.

Tezepelumab in patients with allergic and eosinophilic asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease commonly driven by allergic and/or eosinophilic inflammation, both of which may be present in severe disease. Most approved biologics for severe asthma are indicated for specific phenotypes and target individual downstream type 2 components of the inflammatory cascade. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G2λ), binds specifically to thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine that initiates and sustains allergic and eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. By blocking TSLP, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across known asthma phenotypes and acts upstream of all current clinically used biomarkers. In a pooled analysis of the phase 2b PATHWAY (NCT02054130) and phase 3 NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279) studies, compared with placebo, tezepelumab reduced the annualized asthma exacerbation rate over 52 weeks by 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 53, 70) in patients with perennial aeroallergen sensitization (allergic asthma); by 71% (95% CI: 62, 78) in patients with a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL; and by 71% (95% CI: 59, 79) in patients with allergic asthma and a baseline blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/μL. This review examines the efficacy and mode of action of tezepelumab in patients with allergic asthma, eosinophilic asthma and coexisting allergic and eosinophilic phenotypes.

Differential modulation of allergic rhinitis nasal transcriptome by dupilumab and allergy immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Nasal epithelial cells are important regulators of barrier function and immune signaling; however, in allergic rhinitis (AR) these functions can be disrupted by inflammatory mediators. We aimed to better discern AR disease mechanisms using transcriptome data from nasal brushing samples from individuals with and without AR.

METHODS

Data were drawn from a feasibility study of individuals with and without AR to Timothy grass and from a clinical trial evaluating 16 weeks of treatment with the following: dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds interleukin (IL)-4Rα and inhibits type 2 inflammation by blocking signaling of both IL-4/IL-13; subcutaneous immunotherapy with Timothy grass (SCIT), which inhibits allergic responses through pleiotropic effects; SCIT + dupilumab; or placebo. Using nasal brushing samples from these studies, we defined distinct gene signatures in nasal tissue of AR disease and after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and assessed how these signatures were modulated by study drug(s).

RESULTS

Treatment with dupilumab (normalized enrichment score [NES] = -1.73, p = .002) or SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), but not SCIT alone (NES = +1.16, p = .107), significantly repressed the AR disease signature. Dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), SCIT (NES = -2.99, p < .001), and SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -3.15, p < .001) all repressed the NAC gene signature.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate type 2 inflammation is an important contributor to the pathophysiology of AR disease and that inhibition of the type 2 pathway with dupilumab may normalize nasal tissue gene expression.

Hot topics in allergen immunotherapy, 2023: Current status and future perspective

The importance of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is multifaceted, encompassing both clinical and quality-of-life improvements and cost-effectiveness in the long term. Key mechanisms of allergen tolerance induced by AIT include changes in memory type allergen-specific T- and B-cell responses towards a regulatory phenotype with decreased Type 2 responses, suppression of allergen-specific IgE and increased IgG1 and IgG4, decreased mast cell and eosinophil numbers in allergic tissues and increased activation thresholds. The potential of novel patient enrolment strategies for AIT is taking into account recent advances in biomarkers discoveries, molecular allergy diagnostics and mobile health applications contributing to a personalized approach enhancement that can increase AIT efficacy and compliance. Artificial intelligence can help manage and interpret complex and heterogeneous data, including big data from omics and non-omics research, potentially predict disease subtypes, identify biomarkers and monitor patient responses to AIT. Novel AIT preparations, such as synthetic compounds, innovative carrier systems and adjuvants, are also of great promise. Advances in clinical trial models, including adaptive, complex and hybrid designs as well as real-world evidence, allow more flexibility and cost reduction. The analyses of AIT cost-effectiveness show a clear long-term advantage compared to pharmacotherapy. Important research questions, such as defining clinical endpoints, biomarkers of patient selection and efficacy, mechanisms and the modulation of the placebo effect and alternatives to conventional field trials, including allergen exposure chamber studies are still to be elucidated. This review demonstrates that AIT is still in its growth phase and shows immense development prospects.

Tezepelumab for Severe Asthma: One Drug Targeting Multiple Disease Pathways and Patient Types

Asthma is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease of the airways, affecting many children, adolescents, and adults worldwide. Up to 10% of people with asthma have severe disease, associated with a higher risk of hospitalizations, greater healthcare costs, and poorer outcomes. Patients with severe asthma generally require high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications to achieve disease control; however, many patients remain uncontrolled despite this intensive treatment. The treatment of severe uncontrolled asthma has improved with greater understanding of asthma pathways and phenotypes as well as the advent of targeted biologic therapies. Tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks thymic stromal lymphopoietin, an epithelial cytokine that has multifaceted effects on the initiation and persistence of asthma inflammation and pathophysiology. Unlike other biologic treatments, tezepelumab has demonstrated efficacy across severe asthma phenotypes, with the magnitude of effects varying by phenotype. Here we describe the anti-inflammatory effects and efficacy of tezepelumab across the most relevant phenotypes of severe asthma. Across clinical studies, tezepelumab reduced annualized asthma exacerbation rates versus placebo by 63-71% in eosinophilic severe asthma, by 58-68% in allergic severe asthma, by 67-71% in allergic and eosinophilic severe asthma, by 34-49% in type 2-low asthma, and by 31-41% in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Furthermore, in all these asthma phenotypes, tezepelumab demonstrated higher efficacy in reducing exacerbations requiring hospitalizations or emergency department visits versus placebo. In patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, who commonly have multiple drivers of inflammation and disease, tezepelumab may modulate airway inflammation more extensively, as other available biologics block only specific downstream components of the inflammatory cascade.

The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Food Allergy

The landscape of food allergy (FA) treatment is poised for a paradigm shift with the emergence of biologic therapies. The Food and Drug Administration approval of a standardized peanut powder for oral immunotherapy in 2020 marked a milestone, signaling a departure from allergen avoidance toward proactive treatment strategies. Although oral immunotherapy has been proven effective in desensitizing patients to specific allergens, there are several limitations such as lacking standardization, a long-time commitment to achieve maintenance, and adverse events. Biologics, including omalizumab, dupilumab, and antialarmins, have shown promise in treating various allergic diseases, including FA. These biologics target the underlying immunologic pathways driving allergic reactions, offering an antigen-agnostic approach. Omalizumab (anti-IgE) has been the most studied biologic in this space and can be used both as an adjunct therapy with oral immunotherapy and as monotherapy. Dupilumab targeting IL-4 and IL-13 also shows promise as an adjunct therapy. The emergence of antialarmins further broadens the spectrum of FA treatment possibilities. Biologics represent a transformative approach to FA treatment, directly addressing the underlying mechanisms. Future research should focus on patient selection criteria, personalized biomarker panels, optimal timing of intervention, and treatment durations.

Investigating Experimental Treatments for Rhinitis: A State-of-the-Art Systematic Review

Background: Rhinitis is a common inflammatory condition that affects the nasal passages, significantly impacting quality of life and placing a considerable burden on healthcare systems. While traditional treatments offer limited relief, there is a growing interest in novel therapies. This systematic review aims to analyze investigational new treatments for rhinitis. Methods: A search was conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, as well as PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Both ongoing and completed clinical trials exploring innovative therapies for rhinitis, including immunotherapy, probiotics, and stem cell therapy, were included. Results: This systematic review compiled information from 74 clinical trials-51 completed and 23 ongoing-focused on new treatments for rhinitis. A significant portion of the completed studies (44) focused on various forms of immunotherapy, which showed potential for long-term effectiveness and had a high safety profile. Another seven completed trials investigated probiotics as a treatment method, yielding mixed results, though they did show promise in managing symptoms, particularly when combined with other treatments. The ongoing trials are primarily investigating immunotherapy, with a smaller number looking at probiotics and stem cell therapy. This shows a continued exploration of innovative and diverse therapies for managing rhinitis. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of emerging rhinitis therapies to improve patient outcomes and enhance quality of life. Continued research is recommended for developing more effective, personalized, and targeted therapeutic strategies for rhinitis.

Future Directions of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Experts' Perspective

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is broadly used all over the world as the only available disease-modifying treatment option. The aim of this experts' perspective is to address 7 important unmet needs for the further direction of AIT and to provide the readership with the authors' positions on these topics. An international group of experts in the field of AIT have formulated 7 important aspects for the future position of AIT, performed a current literature review, and proposed a consented position on these topics. The aspects discussed and consented by the authors include: (1) alternative routes of allergen application in AIT, (2) potential of recombinant vaccines, (3) the role of allergy diagnosis based on component-resolved diagnosis for AIT composition, (4) the impact of COVID-19 vaccination for further innovations in AIT, (5) potential of combining biologics to AIT, (6) future innovations in high-risk children/adolescents, and (7) the future regulatory position on AIT. Important unmet needs and topics for AIT have been addressed in this expert review. The authors' views and personal position on these 7 aspects have also been elaborated.

Tezepelumab: an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease in which epithelial cytokines and airway inflammation play critical pathophysiological roles. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial cytokine, is central in the initiation and persistence of airway inflammation in asthma. Tezepelumab is a human immunoglobulin G2λ (IgG2λ) monoclonal antibody developed for treating moderate-to-severe asthma by specifically binding to TSLP and preventing its binding to the TSLP receptor on inflammatory cells. In this narrative review, we describe the results of clinical trials that evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of tezepelumab in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. We also introduce the ongoing clinical trials in patients with asthma as well as future trials investigating the use of tezepelumab for other indications.

Advancing precision medicine in asthma: Evolution of treatment outcomes

The article discusses the historical evolution of asthma treatment and highlights recent advancements in personalized medicine, specifically the use of biologics in severe asthma therapy and its potential combination with allergen immunotherapy (AIT). One of the major breakthroughs of biologics is their potential effect on airway remodeling, a crucial aspect of asthma chronicity. The article introduces the concept of disease-modifying antiasthmatic drugs, which aim to modify the course of asthma and possibly modulate or prevent airway remodeling. Furthermore, the critical importance of patient-centered outcome measures to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of asthma treatments is emphasized, with the innovative concept of asthma remission introduced as a potential outcome. Recent studies suggest that AIT can be used as an additional therapy to biologic agents for the treatment of allergic asthma. The combination of these treatments has been shown to induce improved clinical outcomes. However, AIT is actually not recommended for use in patients with severe asthma, but encouraging results from studies investigating the combined use of AIT and biologics indicate a novel approach to exploring these treatment modalities. In conclusion, the introduction of biologics and AIT has changed the scenario of respiratory allergy treatment, from a "one size fits all" approach to embracing "individual treatments."

Type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases: targets, therapies and unmet needs

Over the past two decades, significant progress in understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases has enabled the identification of compounds for more than 20 novel targets, which are approved or at various stages of development, finally facilitating a more targeted approach for the treatment of these disorders. Most of these newly identified pathogenic drivers of type 2 inflammation and their corresponding treatments are related to mast cells, eosinophils, T cells, B cells, epithelial cells and sensory nerves. Epithelial barrier defects and dysbiotic microbiomes represent exciting future drug targets for chronic type 2 inflammatory conditions. Here, we review common targets, current treatments and emerging therapies for the treatment of five major type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases - atopic dermatitis, chronic prurigo, chronic urticaria, asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - with a high need for targeted therapies. Unmet needs and future directions in the field are discussed.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP), Its Isoforms and the Interplay with the Epithelium in Allergy and Asthma

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is a pleiotropic cytokine that has emerged as a critical player in the development and progression of allergy and asthma. It is primarily produced by epithelial cells and functions as a potent immune system activator. TSLP acts through interaction with its receptor complex, composed of the TSLP receptor (TSLPR) and interleukin-7 receptor alpha chain (IL-7Rα), activating downstream complex signalling pathways. The TSLP major isoform, known as long-form TSLP (lfTSLP), is upregulated in the airway epithelium of patients with allergic diseases. More research is warranted to explore the precise mechanisms by which short-form TSLP (sfTSLP) regulates immune responses. Understanding the dynamic interplay between TSLP and the dysfunctional epithelium provides insights into the mechanisms underlying allergy and asthma pathogenesis. Targeting TSLP represents an important therapeutic strategy, as it may upstream disrupt the inflammatory cascade and alleviate symptoms associated with allergic inflammation.

Treatment of food allergy: Oral immunotherapy, biologics, and beyond

The prevalence of food allergy (FA) has been increasing globally and comes with a heavy burden not just economically, but also on quality of life. Although oral immunotherapy (OIT) is effective at inducing desensitization to food allergens, it has several limitations that weaken its success. Limitations include a long duration of build-up, especially when used for multiple allergens, and a high rate of reported adverse events. Furthermore, OIT may not be effective in all patients. Efforts are underway to identify additional treatment options, either as monotherapy or in combination, to treat FA or enhance the safety and efficacy of OIT. Biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab, which already have US Food and Drug Administration approval for other atopic conditions have been the most studied, but additional biologics and novel strategies are emerging. In this review, we discuss therapeutic strategies including immunoglobulin E inhibitors, immunoglobulin E disruptors, interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 inhibitors, antialarmins, JAK1 and BTK inhibitors, and nanoparticles, and the data surrounding their application in FA and highlighting their potential.

How can we improve our use of allergen immunotherapy as a treatment option for asthma and severe asthma?

INTRODUCTION

In patients suffering from allergic asthma, especially in the pediatric age-group, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) could be of benefit and has the potential of long-term disease modification.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the evidence for a beneficial effect of AIT in allergic asthma. A correct selection of the possible candidates for AIT is crucial. We define the comprehensive allergic asthma diagnosis: confirming asthma, confirming allergic sensitization and having symptoms on exposure to the relevant allergens.We analyze why the first trials on AIT for asthma were contradictory; we consider the results of systematic reviews and discuss the high degree of heterogeneity often found in meta-analysis. We assess recent, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in sublingual AIT that provide robust evidence for a reduction in acute asthma exacerbations and a decrease in the use of inhaled corticosteroids. Further, we demonstrate how real-world trials and large pharmacy data-based analyses confirm these findings for SLIT and SCIT. Finally, we explore the option of AIT in severe asthma patients, once well-controlled on biologic therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Clear indications for AIT in asthma guidelines would benefit allergic asthmatics. AIT is a therapeutic option in appropriately selected asthmatics. Three years treatment has the potential for long-term tolerance, with persisting benefits years after discontinuation.

Targeting type 2 immunity and the future of food allergy treatment

IgE-mediated food allergy affects 6-8% of the population in the United States. Type 2 immune responses are central to the pathogenesis of food allergy, but type 2 CD4+ T cell responses have been found to be heterogeneous in food allergy suggesting a division of labor between Tfh13 and peTH2 cells in promotion of IgE class switching, modulation of intestinal barrier function, and regulation of mast cell expansion. Oral immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergy incompletely targets subsets of type 2 immunity in a transient manner, but new therapeutics targeting different levels of type 2 immunity are in current or planned trials for food allergy. These new treatments and the basis for their use are the focus of this review.