ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Imaging of Pregnant and Lactating Women

Performance of breast MRI for high-risk screening during lactation

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic performance of breast MRI during lactation in the setting of high-risk breast cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening breast MRIs performed between April 2008 and March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) grade was compared between lactating patients and patients who recently stopped lactating using the Mann-Whitney test. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores prevalence rates were compared between lactating patients and controls encompassing young non-lactating patients using the Chi-square test. Diagnostic performance was calculated for patients with a biopsy reference or a 1-year radiologic follow-up.

RESULTS

One-hundred forty-two screening breast MRIs were performed in lactating patients (n = 104, median age, 36.0 ± 6.0 years). Marked BPE appeared in 82% of cases (116/142), with a higher BPE grade in exams performed during lactation as compared with those performed in patients who had recently ceased lactating (p < 0.001). Screening MRIs performed during lactation had a higher rate of BI-RADS 3 scores (40/142, 28% vs. 683/8922, 7%, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of BI-RADS 1/2 scores (88/142, 62% vs. 7549/8922, 84.6%, p = 0.002) compared with those performed in controls (n = 8922). One pregnancy-associated breast cancer was detected, and one interval-cancer occurred. All MRI-guided biopsies were negative (n = 13). Screening breast MRI during lactation had 50% sensitivity (1/2), 60% specificity (72/120), 2.0% positive predictive value (1/49), and 98.6% negative predictive value (71/82).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of breast MRI for high-risk screening during lactation is limited by prominent BPE, leading to an increased rate of BI-RADS 3 categorization and diminished overall specificity.

KEY POINTS

Question Studies on breast MRI during lactation were solely focused on studies conducted in patients with known cancer but not in the screening setting. Findings Screening breast MRI during lactation usually results in marked background parenchymal enhancement, negatively impacting its diagnostic performance. Clinical relevance Despite the lower performance, and amidst the significant risk of pregnancy-associated breast cancer, this screening approach remains relevant for lactating patients with high-risk profiles, such as BReast Cancer (BRCA) carriers. Radiologists should be familiar with the normal appearance of breast MRI during lactation.

Quantitative Changes in Breast Density and Mammographic Features Induced by Pregnancy and Lactation: A Longitudinal Study

OBJECTIVE

Quantitative changes in mammographic properties during pregnancy and lactation remain underexplored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify mammographic changes in the breast from prepregnancy through lactation to postweaning at the individual level.

METHODS

Mammograms of 39 women at elevated risk (mean age 38.7 years) who underwent 3 sequential examinations spanning the lactation period were retrospectively analyzed. Volpara-derived mammographic properties, including breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, volumetric breast density, compression force, and radiation dose, were automatically extracted and were statistically compared between the periods.

RESULTS

Significant longitudinal changes in breast tissue were observed. During lactation, breast volume increased by 45%, fibroglandular tissue volume increased by 138.5%, and volumetric breast density increased by 53.2% compared with prepregnancy levels (P <.001 for all). After weaning, these values decreased by 23.3%, 52.8%, and 27.3%, respectively, compared with lactation (P <.001 for all). Breast compression was decreased by 22.3% on average during lactation compared with prepregnancy (P <.001), while it was not different between lactation and postweaning (P = .11). The radiation dose during lactation increased by 20% compared with both prepregnancy (P = .004) and postweaning (P = .005).

CONCLUSION

The temporal changes in mammographic properties from prepregnancy to lactation include significant increases in breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, breast density, and radiation dose, along with a decrease in compression force. While these changes reverse from lactation to postweaning, they generally do not return to prepregnancy levels.

Peripartum Unmasking of Acute Lupus Myopericarditis

BACKGROUND

There is a broad differential diagnosis that should be considered when assessing a postpartum patient in cardiopulmonary distress.

CASE

The authors present a case of postpartum systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated myopericarditis causing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction highlighting the challenges of diagnosis and treatment of new-onset heart failure in postpartum patients.

DISCUSSION

A unique element of this case was peripartum unmasking of SLE with cardiac involvement. Hormonal changes during pregnancy exacerbate helper T-cell mediated autoimmune diseases, potentially triggering SLE in this patient.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

This case emphasizes the importance of using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine the etiology of heart failure during the postpartum period and shared decision-making around guideline-directed medical therapy in a lactating patient.

Multidisciplinary Management of Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer

Breast cancer during pregnancy is uncommon; however, it is one of the most common malignancies affecting pregnant women. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is a complex entity characterized by unique risk factors, presentation, and pathology. Furthermore, although management generally aims to mirror that for nonpregnant patients, there are distinct aspects of oncologic care delivery specific to PABC. The focus is on optimizing maternal outcomes while maximizing maternal and fetal safety. A multidisciplinary approach is key, and the timing of various treatment modalities is critical. Postdelivery care and counseling are also imperative to address issues such as contraception, breastfeeding, and future fertility. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge base and the diagnostic and treatment landscape for PABC, including recent literature and practice pattern updates.

Screening and Diagnostic Mammography During Pregnancy and Lactation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

In recent years, the age of childbearing has been increasing in Western countries, and consequently the need to conduct mammography during pregnancy and lactation is also increasing. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the existing evidence regarding the overall use of mammography during pregnancy and lactation. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Epistemonikos, and clinicaltrials.gov, by using the search terms "pregnancy" AND "mammography", and "lactation" AND "mammography". The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024543971). Initially, 1,038 articles were identified; the titles and abstracts of 441 studies were screened; 40 studies were retrieved; after assessment of full texts, 20 studies were included for data extraction and further analysis. All 20 studies were retrospective; 14 studies included women with pregnancy-associated breast cancer, five studies included women with breast symptoms during pregnancy and/or lactation and one study included young breast cancer patients under age 40. Overall, 420 diagnostic and one incidental screening mammography examinations were performed during pregnancy and/or lactation with a 78.6% cumulative detection rate of breast cancer. The role of mammography was confounded by the use of breast ultrasound in most studies. In conclusion, the use of mammography during pregnancy and lactation is based on empirical data from retrospective studies, not directly addressing this issue. Hence, well-designed, focused, prospective clinical studies are needed in order to improve existing evidence regarding the use of diagnostic and screening mammography during pregnancy and lactation.

Breast cancer screening in BRCA1/2 pathogenic sequence variant carriers during pregnancy and lactation

OBJECTIVES

Women harboring germline BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic sequence variants (PSVs) are at an increased risk for breast cancer. There are no established guidelines for screening during pregnancy and lactation in BRCA carriers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of whole-breast ultrasound (US) screening in pregnant and lactating BRCA PSV carriers.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of BRCA PSV carriers between 2014 and 2020, with follow-up until 2021. Associations between imaging intervals, number of examinations performed and pregnancy-associated breast cancers (PABCs) were examined. PABCs and cancers diagnosed at follow-up were evaluated and characteristics were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall 212 BRCA PSV carriers were included. Mean age was 33.6 years (SD 3.93, range 25-43 years). During 274 screening periods at pregnancy and lactation, eight (2.9 %) PABCs were diagnosed. An additional eight cancers were diagnosed at follow-up. Three out of eight (37.5 %) PABCs were diagnosed by US, whereas clinical breast examination (n = 3), mammography (n = 1) and MRI (n = 1) accounted for the other PACB diagnoses. One PABC was missed by US. The interval from negative imaging to cancer diagnosis was significantly shorter for PABCs compared with cancers diagnosed at follow-up (3.96 ± 2.14 vs. 11.2 ± 4.46 months, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, pregnant BRCA PSV carriers should not delay screening despite challenges like altered breast tissue and hesitancy towards mammography. If no alternatives exist, whole-breast ultrasound can be used. For lactating and postpartum women, a regular screening routine alternating between mammography and MRI is recommended.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update

Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

An Image-Rich Educational Review of Breast Pain

Breast pain is extremely common, occurring in 70% to 80% of women. Most cases of breast pain are from physiologic or benign causes, and patients should be reassured and offered treatment strategies to alleviate symptoms, often without diagnostic imaging. A complete clinical history and physical examination is key for distinguishing intrinsic breast pain from extramammary pain. Breast pain without other suspicious symptoms and with a negative history and physical examination result is rarely associated with malignancy, although it is a common reason for women to undergo diagnostic imaging. When breast imaging is indicated, guidelines according to the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria should be followed as to whether mammography, US, or both are recommended. This review article summarizes the initial clinical evaluation of breast pain and evidence-based guidelines for imaging. Additionally, the article reviews cyclical and noncyclical breast pain and provides an image-rich discussion of the imaging presentation and management of benign and malignant breast pain etiologies.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Breast Disease Imaging Referral Guideline

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Breast Disease Expert Panel consists of breast imaging radiologists, a high-risk breast clinician, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 20 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a systematic rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 30 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 69 recommendation statements across the 20 scenarios. This guideline presents the methods of development and the recommendations for referring asymptomatic individuals, symptomatic patients, and other scenarios requiring imaging of the breast.

MRI of the Lactating Breast

The breasts undergo marked physiologic changes during lactation that can make conventional imaging evaluation with mammography and US challenging. MRI can be a valuable diagnostic aid to differentiate physiologic and benign processes from malignancy in patients who are lactating. In addition, MRI may allow more accurate delineation of disease involvement than does conventional imaging and assists in locoregional staging, screening of the contralateral breast, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical planning. Although the American College of Radiology recommends against patients undergoing contrast-enhanced MRI during pregnancy because of fetal safety concerns, contrast-enhanced MRI is safe during lactation. As more women delay childbearing, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and breast cancer in lactating women beyond the 1st year after pregnancy is increasing. Thus, MRI is increasingly being performed in lactating women for diagnostic evaluation and screening of patients at high risk. PABC is associated with a worse prognosis than that of non-PABCs, with delays in diagnosis contributing to an increased likelihood of advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. Familiarity with the MRI features of the lactating breast and the appearance of various pathologic conditions is essential to avoid diagnostic pitfalls and prevent delays in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The authors review clinical indications for breast MRI during lactation, describe characteristic features of the lactating breast at MRI, and compare MRI features of a spectrum of benign and malignant breast abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Chikarmane in this issue.

Characterization of breast changes in the early gestational period on automated breast ultrasound

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine the characteristics of milk duct development in early pregnancy on ultrasound images.

METHODS

Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) images used for breast cancer screening in 332 pregnant women were evaluated retrospectively to determine when and how ductal development becomes evident on ultrasonography. The diagnostic criteria used for mammary gland changes during the gestational period were extension of the ducts to the margins of the breast where little or no echogenic fibroglandular tissue is seen on sonograms and/or the appearance of ductal structures running along the ascending Cooper's ligament tapering off or ending in a blind end at the superficial layer of the superficial fascia. The correlations between gestational stage and the prevalence of these criteria were verified by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Assessments were performed by a single radiologist with experience reading ABUS images.

RESULTS

With a few exceptions, the prevalence of the above findings increased sharply beginning at 10 weeks, and then increased with progression of gestation, reaching a plateau after 20 weeks (ρ = 0.766, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study suggested that development of the milk ducts in early pregnancy can be observed using ABUS. These findings will be useful to gain a better understanding of breast ultrasound imaging characteristics during pregnancy.

Ultrafast DCE-MRI for discriminating pregnancy-associated breast cancer lesions from lactation related background parenchymal enhancement

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of ultrafast dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in visualization and quantitative characterization of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and its differentiation from background-parenchymal-enhancement (BPE) among lactating patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine lactating participants, including 10 PABC patients and 19 healthy controls, were scanned on 3-T MRI using a conventional DCE protocol interleaved with a golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) ultrafast sequence for the initial phase. The timing of the visualization of PABC lesions was compared to lactational BPE. Contrast-noise ratio (CNR) was compared between the ultrafast and conventional DCE sequences. The differences in each group's ultrafast-derived kinetic parameters including maximal slope (MS), time to enhancement (TTE), and area under the curve (AUC) were statistically examined using the Mann-Whitney test and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

On ultrafast MRI, breast cancer lesions enhanced earlier than BPE (p < 0.0001), enabling breast cancer visualization freed from lactation BPE. A higher CNR was found for ultrafast acquisitions vs. conventional DCE (p < 0.05). Significant differences in AUC, MS, and TTE values were found between the tumor and BPE (p < 0.05), with ROC-derived AUC of 0.86 ± 0.06, 0.82 ± 0.07, and 0.68 ± 0.08, respectively. The BPE grades of the lactating PABC patients were reduced as compared with the healthy lactating controls (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Ultrafast DCE MRI allows BPE-free visualization of lesions, improved tumor conspicuity, and kinetic quantification of breast cancer during lactation. Implementation of this method may assist in the utilization of breast MRI for lactating patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ultrafast sequence appears to be superior to conventional DCE MRI in the challenging evaluation of the lactating breast. Thus, supporting its possible utilization in the setting of high-risk screening during lactation and the diagnostic workup of PABC.

KEY POINTS

• Differences in the enhancement slope of cancer relative to BPE allowed the optimal visualization of PABC lesions on mid-acquisitions of ultrafast DCE, in which the tumor enhanced prior to the background parenchyma. • The conspicuity of PABC lesions on top of the lactation-related BPE was increased using an ultrafast sequence as compared with conventional DCE MRI. • Ultrafast-derived maps provided further characterization and parametric contrast between PABC lesions and lactation-related BPE.

Breast Imaging and Intervention during Pregnancy and Lactation

Physiologic changes that occur in the breast during pregnancy and lactation create challenges for breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Despite these challenges, imaging evaluation should not be deferred, because delayed diagnosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer contributes to poor outcomes. Both screening and diagnostic imaging can be safely performed using protocols based on age, breast cancer risk, and whether the patient is pregnant or lactating. US is the preferred initial imaging modality for the evaluation of clinical symptoms in pregnant women, followed by mammography if the US findings are suspicious for malignancy or do not show the cause of the clinical symptom. Breast MRI is not recommended during pregnancy because of the use of intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents. Diagnostic imaging for lactating women is the same as that for nonpregnant nonlactating individuals, beginning with US for patients younger than 30 years old and mammography followed by US for patients aged 30 years and older. MRI can be performed for high-risk screening and local-regional staging in lactating women. The radiologist may encounter a wide variety of breast abnormalities, some specific to pregnancy and lactation, including normal physiologic changes, benign disorders, and malignant neoplasms. Although most masses encountered are benign, biopsy should be performed if the imaging characteristics are suspicious for cancer or if the finding does not resolve after a short period of clinical follow-up. Knowledge of the expected imaging appearance of physiologic changes and common benign conditions of pregnancy and lactation is critical for differentiating these findings from pregnancy-associated breast cancer. ©RSNA, 2023 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center.

Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part I: Obstetric (Non-Fetal) Complications

Acute abdominopelvic pain in pregnant and postpartum patients presents clinical and therapeutic challenges, often requiring quick and accurate imaging diagnosis. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be a powerful diagnostic tool in the setting of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy and puerperium. MRI overcomes some drawbacks of US, avoiding the ionizing radiation exposure of a computed tomography (CT) scan. Although CT is not usually appropriate in pregnant patients, it is crucial in the emergency evaluation of postpartum complications. The aim of this article is to provide radiologists with a thorough familiarity with the common and uncommon pregnancy and puerperium abdominal emergencies by illustrating their imaging appearances. The present first section will review and discuss the imaging findings for acute abdominopelvic pain of obstetric (non-fetal) etiology.

MRI can accurately diagnose breast cancer during lactation

OBJECTIVE

To test the diagnostic performance of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during lactation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Datasets of 198 lactating patients, including 66 pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) patients and 132 controls, who were scanned by DCE on 1.5-T MRI, were retrospectively evaluated. Six blinded, expert radiologists independently read a single DCE maximal intensity projection (MIP) image for each case and were asked to determine whether malignancy was suspected and the background-parenchymal-enhancement (BPE) grade. Likewise, computer-aided diagnosis CAD MIP images were independently read by the readers. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) analysis was measured and compared among four consecutive acquisitions of DCE subtraction images.

RESULTS

For MIP-DCE images, the readers achieved the following means: sensitivity 93.3%, specificity 80.3%, positive-predictive-value 70.4, negative-predictive-value 96.2, and diagnostic accuracy of 84.6%, with a substantial inter-rater agreement (Kappa = 0.673, p value < 0.001). Most false-positive interpretations were attributed to either the MIP presentation, an underlying benign lesion, or an asymmetric appearance due to prior treatments. CAD's derived diagnostic accuracy was similar (p = 0.41). BPE grades were significantly increased in the healthy controls compared to the PABC cohort (p < 0.001). CNR significantly decreased by 11-13% in each of the four post-contrast images (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Breast DCE MRI maintains its high efficiency among the lactating population, probably due to a vascular-steal phenomenon, which causes a significant reduction of BPE in cancer cases. Upon validation by prospective, multicenter trials, this study could open up the opportunity for breast MRI to be indicated in the screening and diagnosis of lactating patients, with the aim of facilitating an earlier diagnosis of PABC.

KEY POINTS

• A single DCE MIP image was sufficient to reach a mean sensitivity of 93.3% and NPV of 96.2%, to stress the high efficiency of breast MRI during lactation. • Reduction in BPE among PABC patients compared to the lactating controls suggests that several factors, including a possible vascular steal phenomenon, may affect cancer patients. • Reduction in CNR along four consecutive post-contrast acquisitions highlights the differences in breast carcinoma and BPE kinetics and explains the sufficient conspicuity on the first subtracted image.

Cancer in pregnancy: breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and for women under 40, it is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. A specific type of breast cancer is pregnancy-associated breast cancer, which is diagnosed during pregnancy, the first-year postpartum, or during lactation. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is seen in 3/1000 pregnancies and is increasing in incidence as women delay pregnancy. This type of breast cancer is more aggressive, and not infrequently, there is a delay in diagnosis attributed to physiologic changes that occur during pregnancy and a lack of awareness among physicians. In this review, we discuss the demographics of pregnancy-associated breast cancer, provide differential considerations, and illustrate the multimodality imaging features to bring attention to the radiologist about this aggressive form of breast cancer.

Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is commonly defined as a breast cancer occurring during pregnancy, throughout 1 year postpartum, or during lactation. Despite being a rare circumstance, PABC is one of the most common types of malignancies occurring during pregnancy and lactation, with growing incidence in developed countries, due both to decreasing age at onset of breast cancer and to increasing maternal age. Diagnosis and management of malignancy in the prenatal and postnatal settings are challenging for practitioners, as the structural and functional changes that the breast undergoes may be misleading for both the radiologist and the clinician. Furthermore, safety concerns for the mother and child, as well as psychological aspects in this unique and delicate condition, need to be constantly considered. In this comprehensive review, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of PABC (including surgery, chemotherapy and other systemic treatments, and radiotherapy) are presented and fully discussed, based on medical literature, current international clinical guidelines, and systematic practice.

Imaging modalities and optimized imaging protocols in pregnant patients with cancer

Medical imaging during pregnancy may be necessary to diagnose conditions that affect the outcome of the mother and fetus. Diagnosis and staging of cancer in pregnant women can be particularly challenging due to fear of inherent risk to the fetus, lack of standardized imaging protocols, and ethical challenges posed while choosing the best imaging option. Ultrasound and MRI, due to lack of ionizing radiation, are preferred over CT and nuclear imaging. The latter may be considered only if the benefits of imaging outweigh maternal and fetal risk without exceeding the cumulative established fetal radiation dose threshold. This article provides an overview of all currently available imaging options that can be used for imaging cancer during pregnancy to support the best possible maternal and fetal outcomes.

Breastfeeding and the patient's perspective

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to summarize available data on breastfeeding in patients with a cancer diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of available literature in the MEDLINE database was performed and the data summarized. In addition, two patient interviews were conducted to gain insight into the patient perspective.

RESULTS

Breastmilk is the nutritional standard for human infants and understanding the implications of a cancer diagnosis on lactation is important in optimizing maternal and infant outcomes. Though limited, available data suggest that breastfeeding may be a safe and appropriate option for some patients undergoing treatment of a malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient experiences with breastfeeding in the setting of a cancer diagnosis vary widely, and depend on the type of malignancy, the timing of the diagnosis, and the indicated treatment. Breastfeeding may be an appropriate option for certain patients after multidisciplinary counseling. Alternatives to breastfeeding exist for patients who are unable to or do not desire to breastfeed.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Angiogenesis and Cell Proliferation of Breast Cancer Evaluated by Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background. Breast cancer is the uncontrolled proliferation of breast epithelial cells under the action of various carcinogenic factors. The evaluation of early efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is helpful to change the treatment plan in time. On this basis, dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was used to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on angiogenesis and cell proliferation in breast cancer. Objective. To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on angiogenesis and cell proliferation of breast cancer by dynamic enhanced DCE-MRI. Method. 80 breast cancer patients were divided into the routine chemotherapy group (3 cycles) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups (3 cycles) of 40 cases each from January 2018 to June 2021. Based on conventional imaging, DCE-MRI was performed with Intera Achieva 3.0 TMR superconducting MR scanner before and after treatment. The quantitative indexes, MRI parameters, cell proliferation expression, and DCE-MRI angiogenesis were compared between the two groups. Result. The inhibition rate, Vepost, Ktranspre, ADC, Bax, Alexi, and Aurora in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group were significantly higher than those in the conventional chemotherapy group ( $P<0.05$ ), while Kep, Ktrans, and Nek2 were significantly lower than those in the conventional chemotherapy group ( $P<0.05$ ). Vepre (cm3), Ktranspre (ml/min/100 cm3), and Ve had no significant difference ( $P>0.05$ ). Conclusion. The quantitative parameters, MRI parameters, proliferation, and expression of DCE-MRI in breast cancer patients with different chemotherapy regimens are quite different. They can be applied to the diagnosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with angiogenesis and cell proliferation.

Imaging Cancer in Pregnancy

Pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) is defined as cancer that is detected during pregnancy and up to 1 year postpartum. Although rare (~1:1000 pregnancies), PAC is increasing owing to postponed childbearing and advanced maternal age at conception. Cancer-related symptoms masked by physiologic gestational changes may delay diagnosis. Imaging, clinical management, and treatment require a carefully choreographed multidisciplinary team approach. The risk-benefit of every imaging modality, the strategies to balance the safety of mother and fetus, and the support of the patient and family at every step are crucial. US and MRI are preferred imaging modalities that lack ionizing radiation. Radiation dose concerns should be addressed, noting that most imaging examinations (including mammography, radiography, CT, and technetium 99m-labeled sulfur colloid sentinel lymph node staging) are performed at radiation levels below thresholds at which deterministic side effects are seen. Dose estimates should be provided after each examination. The use of iodinated intravenous contrast material is safe during pregnancy, but gadolinium-based contrast material should be avoided. Accurate diagnosis and staging combined with gestational age affect decisions about surgery and chemotherapy. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences is ideal to screen for primary and metastatic sites, determine disease stage, identify biopsy targets, and guide further cancer site-specific imaging. The authors provide an update of the imaging triage, safety considerations, cancer-specific imaging, and treatment options for cancer in pregnancy. An invited commentary by Silverstein and Van Loon is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances

The breast experiences substantial changes in morphology and function during pregnancy and lactation which affects its imaging properties and may reduce the visibility of a concurrent pathological process. The high incidence of benign gestational-related entities may further add complexity to the clinical and radiological evaluation of the breast during the period. Consequently, pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and carries a poor prognosis. This state-of-the-art pictorial review illustrates how despite currently being underutilized, technical advances and new clinical evidence support the use of unenhanced breast MRI during pregnancy and both unenhanced and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) during lactation, to serve as effective supplementary modalities in the diagnostic work-up of PABC.

MRI Evaluation of the Lactating Breast

Purpose of Review

To review the MRI appearance of physiologic lactational changes, common benign pathologies, and malignancies in the lactating breast.

Recent Findings

The prevalence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer has increased as more women delay childbirth and lactation. There is a transient increase in breast cancer risk after delivery when women may be lactating. MRI is more sensitive than mammography and ultrasound for the evaluation of the extent of disease in lactating women.

Summary

Understanding the key MRI findings of benign and malignant pathologies in the lactating breast is critical for accurate diagnosis and prompt evaluation of pregnancy-associated breast cancer.

Non-BRCA Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Young Women

The incidence of breast cancer in younger women is rising. Although early-onset breast cancer is highly associated with biologically aggressive tumors such as triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers, the more recent increase is disproportionately driven by an increase in the incidence of luminal cancer. In particular, the increase in de novo stage IV disease and the inherent age-based poorer survival rate among younger women with even early-stage luminal cancers suggest underlying distinct biologic characteristics that are not well understood. Further contributing to the higher number of early-onset breast cancers is pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC), which is attributed to persistent increases in maternal age over time. Although guidelines for screening of patients who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation are well established, this population comprises only a fraction of those with early-onset breast cancer. A lack of screening in most young patients precludes timely diagnosis, underscoring the importance of early education and awareness. The disproportionate disease burden in young women of certain racial and ethnic groups, which is further exacerbated by socioeconomic disparity in health care, results in worse outcomes. An invited commentary by Monticciolo is available online. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Background parenchymal enhancement and uptake as breast cancer imaging biomarkers: A state-of-the-art review

Within the past decade, background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) and background parenchymal uptake (BPU) have emerged as novel imaging-derived biomarkers in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. Growing evidence supports the role of breast parenchyma vascularity and metabolic activity as probable risk factors for breast cancer development. Furthermore, in the presence of a newly-diagnosed breast cancer, added clinically-relevant data was surprisingly found in the respective imaging properties of the non-affected contralateral breast. Evaluation of the contralateral BPE and BPU have been found to be especially instrumental in predicting the prognosis of a patient with breast cancer and even anticipating their response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Simultaneously, further research has found a link between these two biomarkers, even though they represent different physical properties. The aim of this review is to provide an up to date summary of the current clinical applications of BPE and BPU as breast cancer imaging biomarkers with the hope that it propels their further usage in clinical practice.

Lapses in breast cancer screening for highly penetrant mutation carriers during pregnancy and lactation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Screening for breast cancer in highly penetrant mutation carriers during pregnancy and lactation is challenging and consensus guidelines are lacking. This study evaluates the lapse in screening and the interval pregnancy-associated breast cancer rate.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective cohort study of pregnant and lactating patients with known pathogenic germline mutations was performed. Lapse in screening was defined as the interval between the last screening imaging exam obtained before last menstrual period and the subsequent screening imaging.

RESULTS

Out of 685 patients, 42 had 1-3 evaluable pregnancies (54 total - 28 managed in High Risk Breast Clinic and 26 by OB/GYN). Mutations were observed in patients in BRCA1 (49%), BRCA2 (36%), CDH1 (5%), CHEK2 (2%), ATM (2%), NF1 (3%), and MSH2 (3%). The average screening lapse was 25 [19, 30] months for patients followed in the High Risk Clinic versus 32.5 [21, 65.75] months for patients followed with Routine Care (p = 0.035). We identified three cases of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (interval cancer rate 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with highly penetrant mutations are at risk for the development of interval pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Development of consistent screening guidelines and adherence to those guidelines is needed for this patient population.

MRI of the Lactating Breast: Computer-Aided Diagnosis False Positive Rates and Background Parenchymal Enhancement Kinetic Features

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the application of computer-added diagnosis (CAD) in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI of the healthy lactating breast, focusing on false-positive rates and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) coloring patterns in comparison with breast cancer features in non-lactating patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population was composed of 58 healthy lactating patients and control groups of 113 healthy premenopausal non-lactating patients and 55 premenopausal non-lactating patients with newly-diagnosed breast cancer. Patients were scanned on 1.5-T MRI using conventional DCE protocol. A retrospective analysis of DCE-derived CAD properties was conducted using a commercial software that is regularly utilized in our routine radiological work-up. Qualitative morphological characterization and automatically-obtained quantitative parametric measurements of the BPE-induced CAD coloring were categorized and subgroups' trends and differences between the lactating and cancer cohorts were statistically assessed.

RESULTS

CAD false-positive coloring was found in the majority of lactating cases (87%). Lactation BPE coloring was characteristically non-mass enhancement (NME)-like shaped (87%), bilateral (79%) and symmetric (64%), whereas, unilateral coloring was associated with prior irradiation (p <0.0001). Inter-individual variability in CAD appearance of both scoring-grade and kinetic-curve dominance was found among the lactating cohort. When compared with healthy non-lactating controls, CAD false positive probability was significantly increased [Odds ratio 40.2, p <0001], while in comparison with the breast cancer cohort, CAD features were mostly inconclusive, even though increased size parameters were significantly associated with lactation-BPE (p <0.00001).

CONCLUSION

BPE was identified as a common source for false-positive CAD coloring on breast DCE-MRI among lactating population. Despite several typical characteristics, overlapping features with breast malignancy warrant a careful evaluation and clinical correlation in all cases with suspected lactation induced CAD coloring.

Assessment of the uterine dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis

INTRODUCTION

Digital Mammography (DM-2D) and more recently Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT), are two of the most effective imaging modalities for breast cancer detection, often used in screening programmes. It may happen that exams using these two imaging modalities are inadvertently performed to pregnant women. The objective of this study is to assess the dose in the uterus due to DM-2D and DBT exams, according to two main irradiation scenarios: in the 1st scenario the exposure parameters were pre-selected directly by the imaging system, while in the 2nd scenario, the maximum exposure parameters were chosen.

METHODS

The mammography equipment used was a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration. A physical anthropomorphic phantom, PMMA plates (simulating a breast thickness of 6 cm) and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used to measure entrance air kerma values on the phantom's breast and abdomen in order to successively estimate the mean glandular dose (MGD) and the dose in the uterus. For the two irradiation scenarios chosen, two-breast imaging modalities were selected: 1) DBT in Cranio-Caudal (CC) view (with 28 kV and 160 mAs as exposure parameters), 2) DBT and DM in Medio Lateral-Oblique (MLO) and CC views (with 34 kV and 250 mAs as exposure parameters).

RESULTS

In the 1st scenario, the TLD measurements did not detect significant dose values in the abdomen whereas the MGD estimated using the D.R. Dance model was in close agreement with data available in the literature. In the 2nd scenario, there was no significant difference in MGD estimation between the different views, whereas the air kerma values in the abdomen (in DBT mode, CC and MLO) were 0.049 mGy and 0.004 mGy respectively. In CC DM-2D mode the abdomen air kerma value was 0.026 mGy, with no significant detected value in MLO view.

CONCLUSIONS

For the dose in the uterus, the obtained values seem to indicate that DM-2D and DBT examinations inadvertently performed during pregnancy do not pose a significant radiological risk, even considering the case of overexposure in both breasts.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The accurate knowledge of the doses in DM-2D and DBT will contribute to raise the awareness among medical practitioners involved in breast imaging empowering them to provide accurate information about dose levels in the uterus, improving their radiation risk communication skills and consequently helping to reduce the anxiety of pregnant women undergoing this type of examinations.

Status of breast care during pregnancy with milk production and disease

BACKGROUND

Breast care is an important routine during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Its absence leads to inadequate milk production before and after childbirth.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the status of breast care during pregnancy, which is related to milk production and disease after childbirth in the Tinggede Health Center, Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi.

METHODS

The method used was an analytic survey with a cross-sectional approach and the samples were 82 breastfeeding mothers in the working area of the Tinggede Health Center. The sampling used a total population, and data were obtained by interview and observation. Furthermore, the analysis technique used Chi-Square.

RESULTS

The results showed there was a relationship between breast care during pregnancy with milk production (p = 0.001), and breast care status with a disease (p = 0.012). The common diseases suffered by breastfeeding mothers due to inadequate care are non-protruding nipples, infections, blocked milk ducts, mastitis, and lumps.

CONCLUSIONS

Breastfeeding mothers' failure to care for their breasts during pregnancy can lead to lack of milk production and diseases such as non-protruding nipples, infections, blocked milk ducts, mastitis, and lumps.

Radiologic and Pathologic Correlation for Lactating Adenomas

Lactating adenomas are benign breast lesions that occur in pregnant, lactating, and postpartum women. These lesions have no associated malignant potential; their origin is disputed with no consensus on whether they represent hyperplastic or neoplastic processes. On ultrasound, lactating adenomas are classically described as solid, circumscribed, parallel masses with iso/hypoechoic internal echotexture and posterior enhancement. Histologically, lactating adenomas appear as circumscribed nodules of tightly packed lobular acini with extensive lactational change during pregnancy or the postpartum period. Masses in pregnant and lactating women with probably benign imaging characteristics-oval, circumscribed, parallel, iso/hypoechoic-can be managed with short interval follow-up (BI-RADS 3) rather than biopsy. However, lactating adenomas can also demonstrate characteristics that overlap with pregnancy-associated breast cancer, such as margins that are not circumscribed, prompting biopsy to exclude pregnancy-associated carcinoma. Breast imaging radiologists must be aware of the variable appearances of lactating adenomas to appropriately manage pregnant and lactating women presenting with palpable lumps.

Breast imaging and cancer diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations from the Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM

The Italian College of Breast Radiologists by the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) provides recommendations for breast care provision and procedural prioritization during COVID-19 pandemic, being aware that medical decisions must be currently taken balancing patient's individual and community safety: (1) patients having a scheduled or to-be-scheduled appointment for in-depth diagnostic breast imaging or needle biopsy should confirm the appointment or obtain a new one; (2) patients who have suspicious symptoms of breast cancer (in particular: new onset palpable nodule; skin or nipple retraction; orange peel skin; unilateral secretion from the nipple) should request non-deferrable tests at radiology services; (3) asymptomatic women performing annual mammographic follow-up after breast cancer treatment should preferably schedule the appointment within 1 year and 3 months from the previous check, compatibly with the local organizational conditions; (4) asymptomatic women who have not responded to the invitation for screening mammography after the onset of the pandemic or have been informed of the suspension of the screening activity should schedule the check preferably within 3 months from the date of the not performed check, compatibly with local organizational conditions. The Italian College of Breast Radiologists by SIRM recommends precautions to protect both patients and healthcare workers (radiologists, radiographers, nurses, and reception staff) from infection or disease spread on the occasion of breast imaging procedures, particularly mammography, breast ultrasound, breast magnetic resonance imaging, and breast intervention procedures.

US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age

Background Women are increasingly delaying childbearing, and thus lactation, into their 30s and 40s, when mammography would typically be the initial imaging modality to evaluate palpable masses in the general population. Current guidelines recommend US as the first-line imaging modality for palpable masses in pregnant and lactating women, but data regarding breastfeeding women age 30 years and older are near nonexistent. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic performance of targeted US as the primary imaging modality for the evaluation of palpable masses in lactating women, including those of advanced maternal age. Materials and Methods Lactating women with palpable breast masses evaluated at targeted US over a 17-year period (January 2000 to July 2017) were retrospectively identified. All US evaluations were performed at diagnostic evaluation, and mammography was performed at the discretion of the interpreting radiologist. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System assessments, imaging, and pathology results were collected. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency tables were assessed at the patient level. Results There were 167 women (mean age, 35 years ± 5 [standard deviation]), 101 of whom (60%) were of advanced maternal age (≥35 years). All women underwent targeted US, and 98 (59%) underwent mammography in addition to US. The frequency of malignancy was five of 167 (3.0%). Targeted US demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of five of five (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 48%, 100%) and 114 of 162 (70%; 95% CI: 63%, 77%), respectively. Negative predictive value, positive predictive value of an abnormal examination, and positive predictive value of biopsy were 114 of 114 (100%; 95% CI: 97%, 100%), five of 53 (9.4%; 95% CI: 3%, 21%), and five of 50 (10%; 95% CI: 3%, 22%), respectively. In the subset of 98 women who underwent mammography in addition to US, mammography depicted seven incidental suspicious findings, which lowered the specificity from 62 of 93 (67%; 95% CI: 56%, 76%) to 57 of 93 (61%; 95% CI: 51%, 71%) (P = .02). Conclusion Targeted US depicted all malignancies in lactating women with palpable masses. Adding mammography increased false-positive findings without any additional cancer diagnoses. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Newell in this issue.

Current Recommendations for Breast Imaging of the Pregnant and Lactating Patient

During pregnancy and lactation, the breast undergoes unique changes that manifest as varied clinical and imaging findings. Understanding the expected physiologic changes of the breast as well as recognizing the best imaging modalities for a given clinical scenario can help the radiologist identify the abnormalities arising during this time. Discussion with the patient about the safety of breast imaging can reassure patients and improve management. This article reviews the physiologic changes of the breast during pregnancy and lactation; the safety and utility of various imaging modalities; upto-date consensus on screening guidelines; recommendations for diagnostic evaluation of breast pain, palpable abnormalities, and nipple discharge; and recommendations regarding advanced modalities such as breast MRI. In addition, the commonly encountered benign and malignant entities affecting these patients are discussed.

Physiologic and hypermetabolic breast 18-F FDG uptake on PET/CT during lactation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the patterns of breast cancer-related and lactation-related ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in breasts of lactating patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) and without breast cancer.

METHODS

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT datasets of 16 lactating patients with PABC and 16 non-breast cancer lactating patients (controls) were retrospectively evaluated. Uptake was assessed in the tumor and non-affected lactating tissue of the PABC group, and in healthy lactating breasts of the control group, using maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively), and breast-SUVmax/liver-SUVmean ratio. Statistical tests were used to evaluate differences and correlations between the groups.

RESULTS

Physiological uptake in non-breast cancer lactating patients' breasts was characteristically high regardless of active malignancy status other than breast cancer (SUVmax = 5.0 ± 1.7, n = 32 breasts). Uptake correlated highly between the two breasts (r = 0.61, p = 0.01), but was not correlated with age or lactation duration (p = 0.24 and p = 0.61, respectively). Among PABC patients, the tumors demonstrated high ¹⁸F-FDG uptake (SUVmax = 7.8 ± 7.2, n = 16), which was 326-643% higher than the mostly low physiological FDG uptake observed in the non-affected lactating parenchyma of these patients (SUVmax = 2.1 ± 1.1). Overall, ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in lactating breasts of PABC patients was significantly decreased by 59% (p < 0.0001) compared with that of lactating controls without breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG uptake in lactating tissue of PABC patients is markedly lower compared with the characteristically high physiological uptake among lactating patients without breast cancer. Consequently, breast tumors visualized by ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PET/CT were comfortably depicted on top of the background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in lactating tissue of PABC patients.

KEY POINTS

• FDG uptake in the breast is characteristically high among lactating patients regardless of the presence of an active malignancy other than breast cancer. • FDG uptake in non-affected lactating breast tissue is significantly lower among PABC patients compared with that in lactating women who do not have breast cancer. • In pregnancy-associated breast cancer patients, ¹⁸F-FDG uptake is markedly increased in the breast tumor compared with uptake in the non-affected lactating tissue, enabling its prompt visualization on PET/CT.

ABM Clinical Protocol #34: Breast Cancer and Breastfeeding

A central goal of The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical problems that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.

Breast lesions during pregnancy and lactation: a pictorial essay

A wide range of breast lesions can arise during pregnancy and lactation, from benign or Epub ahead of print inflammatory diseases to malignant tumors. Hormone-influenced physiological changes of the breast make the radiological evaluation of breast lesions challenging. Knowledge of the imaging features of normal physiological changes and common breast lesions during this period can help radiologists accurately diagnose and appropriately manage conditions. As such, this pictorial essay illustrates normal physiological changes related to pregnancy and lactation, as well as common benign and malignant breast lesions encountered during those periods.

Breast Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation

Breast imaging during pregnancy and lactation is important in order to avoid delays in the diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy-associated breast cancers. Radiologists have an opportunity to improve breast cancer detection by becoming familiar with appropriate breast imaging and providing recommendations to women and their referring physicians. Importantly, during pregnancy and lactation, both screening and diagnostic breast imaging can be safely performed. Here we describe when and how to screen, how to work up palpable masses, and evaluate bloody nipple discharge. The imaging features of common findings in the breasts of pregnant and lactating women are also reviewed. Finally, we address breast cancer staging and provide a brief primer on treatment options for pregnancy-associated breast cancers.

Ultrasound Imaging Characteristics of Breast Lesions Diagnosed During Pregnancy and Lactation

Background and Objectives: The breast undergoes extensive physiologic changes during pregnancy/lactation. We aimed to review the ultrasound (US) imaging characteristics of breast lesions during pregnancy/lactation and to demonstrate ultrasonography as an excellent imaging modality in this patient population. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study involving 195 patients with 206 pathologically confirmed breast lesions during pregnancy/lactation over the period of January 2010 to December 2018; 51 were diagnosed with breast cancer, including 50 invasive ductal carcinomas and 1 low malignant potential phyllodes tumor, whereas 144 were diagnosed with 155 benign lesions, including 103 mastitis/abscesses, 45 fibroadenomas, 2 intraductal papillomas, 2 sclerosing lesions, and 3 benign phyllodes tumors. The patients' age, lesion diameter, and US characteristics were analyzed. Results: The breast lesions of patients during pregnancy/lactation were compared with those during nonpregnancy/lactation. Patients with breast cancer or fibroadenomas during pregnancy/lactation were younger than those during nonpregnancy/lactation. The average lesion diameter was significantly higher among pregnant/lactating patients compared with controls of childbearing age for fibroadenomas, but not for malignant lesions. The fibroadenomas and mastitis/abscesses during pregnancy/lactation usually have higher BI-RADS categories than those during nonpregnancy/lactation. Conclusions: The imaging features of breast cancer during pregnancy/lactation did not differ much from those of nonpregnancy/lactation; however, some benign lesions had suspicious sonographic features, and US-guided core biopsies were necessary for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.