ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer recurrence presenting as anterior abdominal wall necrotising fasciitis

Endometrial cancer is the second leading cause of malignancy in women worldwide. Risk of recurrence and treatment depends on tumour grade, stage and more recently, molecular classification. This case details an atypical presentation of endometrial cancer recurrence. A postmenopausal woman presented to hospital in septic shock with anterior abdominal wall necrotising fasciitis. She was 5 years into her surveillance for FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) Grade III, Stage IIIA mixed endometrioid and clear cell endometrial adenocarcinoma, treated by total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, vaginal brachytherapy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Necrotising fasciitis was localised to a fluid collection associated with biological mesh on the anterior abdominal wall. Histopathology and cytology of the fluid collection revealed high-grade serous endometrial carcinoma. Recurrence in the incision has previously been described in the literature, however not as a fluid collection in association with biological mesh nor causing necrotising fasciitis of the anterior abdominal wall.

Optimizing Final Pathology Determination in Endometrial Cancer: The Role of PET/CT, MRI, and Biopsy in Serous, Mixed Cell, Clear Cell, and Grade 3 Endometrioid Subtypes

Background: Accurate and timely diagnosis of endometrial cancer is crucial for guiding effective treatment and improving patient survival. Endometrial cancer diagnosis, staging, metastasis detection, and treatment planning utilize endometrial biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning as crucial diagnostic modalities. Aggressive subtypes such as serous, mixed cell, clear cell, and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas present considerable diagnostic and therapeutic obstacles given their unfavorable prognosis, underscoring the importance of accurate preoperative evaluation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from seventy patients diagnosed with serous, mixed cell, clear cell, or grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer, who received surgical treatment from 2020 to 2023. To assess the diagnostic capabilities of each modality in determining final pathology and disease staging, a comparison was performed using results from preoperative endometrial biopsy, MRI, PET/CT, and postoperative histopathology. Cohen's kappa coefficient was employed to determine the level of agreement observed between pre- and postoperative results. Results: Endometrial biopsy demonstrated moderate yet statistically significant concordance with definitive histopathological diagnoses (κ = 0.537, p < 0.001); however, diagnostic errors were observed, especially in instances of mixed and clear cell carcinomas. MRI demonstrated efficacy in identifying local tumor invasion, yet its capacity to detect distant metastases was demonstrably limited. PET/CT was most effective in identifying distant metastases and omental involvement in advanced-stage disease. Conclusions: Definitive pathological diagnosis and staging of endometrial carcinoma are effectively established using endometrial biopsy and MRI. The utility of PET/CT is particularly pronounced in identifying distant metastases in patients with serous carcinoma and advanced-stage disease. Integrating biopsy, MRI, and PET/CT into a multimodal diagnostic strategy enhances diagnostic accuracy and enables personalized treatment planning, particularly for aggressive tumor subtypes.

Preoperative Imaging Evaluation of Endometrial Cancer in FIGO 2023

The staging of endometrial cancer is based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system according to the examination of surgical specimens, and has revised in 2023, 14 years after its last revision in 2009. Molecular and histological classification has incorporated to new FIGO system reflecting the biological behavior and prognosis of endometrial cancer. Nonetheless, the basic role of imaging modalities including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography, as a preoperative assessment of the tumor extension and also the evaluation points in CT and MRI imaging are not changed, other than several point of local tumor extension. In the field of radiology, it has also undergone remarkable advancement through the rapid progress of computational technology. The application of deep learning reconstruction techniques contributes the benefits of shorter acquisition time or higher quality. Radiomics, which extract various quantitative features from the images, is also expected to have the potential for the quantitative prediction of risk factors such as histological types and lymphovascular space invasion, which is newly included in the new FIGO system. This article reviews the preoperative imaging diagnosis in new FIGO system and recent advances in imaging analysis and their clinical contributions in endometrial cancer. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Multiparametric MRI for characterization of the tumour microenvironment

Our understanding of tumour biology has evolved over the past decades and cancer is now viewed as a complex ecosystem with interactions between various cellular and non-cellular components within the tumour microenvironment (TME) at multiple scales. However, morphological imaging remains the mainstay of tumour staging and assessment of response to therapy, and the characterization of the TME with non-invasive imaging has not yet entered routine clinical practice. By combining multiple MRI sequences, each providing different but complementary information about the TME, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enables non-invasive assessment of molecular and cellular features within the TME, including their spatial and temporal heterogeneity. With an increasing number of advanced MRI techniques bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical applications, mpMRI could ultimately guide the selection of treatment approaches, precisely tailored to each individual patient, tumour and therapeutic modality. In this Review, we describe the evolving role of mpMRI in the non-invasive characterization of the TME, outline its applications for cancer detection, staging and assessment of response to therapy, and discuss considerations and challenges for its use in future medical applications, including personalized integrated diagnostics.

The Added Value of ADC-based Nomogram in Assessing the Depth of Myometrial Invasion of Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the potential value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based nomogram models in preoperatively assessing the depth of myometrial invasion of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 210 EEA patients were retrospectively analyzed. ADC histogram metrics derive from the whole-tumor regions of interest. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to screen the ADC histogram metrics and clinical characteristics for nomogram model building. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of two radiologists without and with the assistance of models were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Two nomogram models were developed for predicting no myometrial invasion (NMI) and deep myometrial invasion (DMI) with area under the curves of 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. With the assistance of models, the overall accuracies were significantly improved [radiologist_1, 73.3% vs 86.2% (p = 0.001); radiologist_2, 80.0% vs 91.0% (p = 0.002)]. In determining NMI, the sensitivity and PPV were greatly improved but not significant for radiologist_1 (51.9% vs 77.8% and 46.7% vs 75.0%, p = 0.229 and 0.511), and under/near the significance level for radiologist_2 (59.3% vs 88.9% and 57.1% vs 82.8%, p = 0.041 and 0.065), while the specificity, accuracy, and NPV were significantly improved (all p < 0.001). In determining DMI, all sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were significantly improved (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The ADC-based nomogram models can improve the diagnostic performance of radiologist in preoperatively assessing the depth of myometrial invasion and facilitate optimizing clinical individualized treatment decisions.

Endometrial Cancer: 2023 Revised FIGO Staging System and the Role of Imaging

The FIGO endometrial cancer staging system recently released updated guidance based on clinical evidence gathered after the previous version was published in 2009. Different imaging modalities are beneficial across various stages of endometrial cancer (EC) management. Additionally, ongoing research studies are aimed at improving imaging in EC. Gynecological cancer is a crucial element in the practice of a body radiologist. With a new staging system in place, it is important to address the role of radiology in the EC diagnostic pathway. This article is a comprehensive review of the changes made to the FIGO endometrial cancer staging system and the impact of imaging in the staging of this disease.

Nodal infiltration in endometrial cancer: a prediction model using best subset regression

OBJECTIVES

To build preoperative prediction models with and without MRI for regional lymph node metastasis (r-LNM, pelvic and/or para-aortic LNM (PENM/PANM)) and for PANM in endometrial cancer using established risk factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective two-center study, 364 patients with endometrial cancer were included: 253 in the model development and 111 in the external validation. For r-LNM and PANM, respectively, best subset regression with ten-time fivefold cross validation was conducted using ten established risk factors (4 clinical and 6 imaging factors). Models with the top 10 percentile of area under the curve (AUC) and with the fewest variables in the model development were subjected to the external validation (11 and 4 candidates, respectively, for r-LNM and PANM). Then, the models with the highest AUC were selected as the final models. Models without MRI findings were developed similarly, assuming the cases where MRI was not available.

RESULTS

The final r-LNM model consisted of pelvic lymph node (PEN) ≥ 6 mm, deep myometrial invasion (DMI) on MRI, CA125, para-aortic lymph node (PAN) ≥ 6 mm, and biopsy; PANM model consisted of DMI, PAN, PEN, and CA125 (in order of correlation coefficient β values). The AUCs were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92) and 0.86 (0.75-0.94) for the external validation, respectively. The model without MRI for r-LNM and PANM showed AUC of 0.79 (0.68-0.89) and 0.87 (0.76-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prediction models created by best subset regression with cross validation showed high diagnostic performance for predicting LNM in endometrial cancer, which may avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The prediction risks of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and para-aortic LNM can be easily obtained for all patients with endometrial cancer by inputting the conventional clinical information into our models. They help in the decision-making for optimal lymphadenectomy and personalized treatment.

KEY POINTS

•Diagnostic performance of lymph node metastases (LNM) in endometrial cancer is low based on size criteria and can be improved by combining with other clinical information. •The optimized logistic regression model for regional LNM consists of lymph node ≥ 6 mm, deep myometrial invasion, cancer antigen-125, and biopsy, showing high diagnostic performance. •Our model predicts the preoperative risk of LNM, which may avoid unnecessary lymphadenectomies.

Application of PET/MRI in Gynecologic Malignancies

The diagnosis, treatment, and management of gynecologic malignancies benefit from both positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and MRI. PET/CT provides important information on the local extent of disease as well as diffuse metastatic involvement. MRI offers soft tissue delineation and loco-regional disease involvement. The combination of these two technologies is key in diagnosis, treatment planning, and evaluating treatment response in gynecological malignancies. This review aims to assess the performance of PET/MRI in gynecologic cancer patients and outlines the technical challenges and clinical advantages of PET/MR systems when specifically applied to gynecologic malignancies.

Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the application of whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram metrics for preoperative risk stratification in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EEA).

METHODS

Preoperative MRI of 502 EEA patients were retrospectively analyzed. Whole tumor ADC histogram analysis was performed with regions of interest drawn on all tumor slices of diffusion-weighted imaging scans. Risk stratification was based on ESMO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines: low-, intermediate-, high-intermediate-, and high-risk. Univariable analysis was used to compare ADC histogram metrics (tumor volume, minADC, maxADC, and meanADC; 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of ADC [recorded as P10, P25, P50, P75, and P90 ADC, respectively]; skewness; and kurtosis) between different risk EEAs, and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the optimal metric or combined model for risk stratifications. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) was used for diagnostic performance evaluation.

RESULTS

A decreasing tendency in multiple ADC values was observed from the low- to high-intermediate-risk EEAs. The (low + intermediate)-risk EEAs and low-risk EEAs had significantly smaller tumor volumes and higher minADCs, meanADCs, P10, P25, P50, P75, and P90 ADCs than the (high-intermediate + high)-risk EEAs and non-low-risk EEAs (all P < 0.05), respectively. The combined models of the (meanADC + volume) and the (P75 ADC + volume) yielded the largest AUCs of 0.775 and 0.780 in identifying the (low + intermediate)- and the low-risk EEAs from the other EEAs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Whole-tumor ADC histogram metrics might be helpful for preoperatively identifying low- and (low + intermediate)-risk EEAs, facilitating personalized therapeutic planning.

MR Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Tumor Mimics

MR imaging is the modality of choice for the pre-treatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic malignancies, given its excellent soft tissue contrast and multi-planar capability. However, it is not without pitfalls. Challenges can be encountered in the assessment of the infiltration of myometrium, vagina, cervical stroma, and parametria, which are crucial prognostic factors for endometrial and cervical cancers. Other challenges can be encountered in the distinction between solid and non-solid tissue and in the identification of peritoneal carcinomatosis for the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass.

Gender bias in shared decision-making among cancer care guidelines: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

In cancer care, the promotion and implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and consensus statements may have potential differences by gender.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically analyse recommendations concerning shared decision-making in CPGs and consensus statements for the most frequent cancers exclusively among males (prostate) and females (endometrial).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We prospectively registered the protocol at PROSPERO (ID: RD42021241127). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and online sources (8 guideline databases and 65 professional society websites) were searched independently by two reviewers, without language restrictions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

CPGs and consensus statements about the diagnosis or treatment of prostate and endometrial cancers were included from January 2015 to August 2021.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Quality assessment deployed a previously developed 31-item tool and differences between the two cancers analysed.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 176 documents met inclusion criteria, 97 for prostate cancer (84 CPGs and 13 consensus statements) and 79 for endometrial cancer (67 CPGs and 12 consensus statements). Shared decision-making was recommended more often in prostate cancer guidelines compared to endometrial cancer (46/97 vs. 13/79, 47.4% vs. 16.5%; p < .001). Compared to prostate cancer guidelines (mean 2.14 items, standard deviation 3.45), compliance with the shared-decision-making 31-item tool was lower for endometrial cancer guidelines (mean 0.48 items, standard deviation 1.29) (p < .001). Regarding advice on the implementation of shared decision-making, it was only reported in 3 (3.8%) endometrial cancer guidelines and in 16 (16.5%) prostate cancer guidelines (p < .001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

We observed a significant gender bias as shared decision-making was systematically more often recommended in the prostate compared to endometrial cancer guidelines. These findings should encourage new CPGs and consensus statements to consider shared decision-making for improving cancer care regardless of the gender affected.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The findings may inform future recommendations for professional associations and governments to update and develop high-quality clinical guidelines to consider patients' preferences and shared decision-making in cancer care.

Imaging of Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States and Europe, with an increasing incidence rate in high-income countries. MR imaging is recommended for treatment planning because it provides critical information on the extent of myometrial and cervical invasion, extrauterine spread, and lymph node status, all of which are important in the selection of the most appropriate therapy. This article highlights the added value of imaging, focused on MR imaging, in the assessment of endometrial cancer and summarizes the role of MR imaging for endometrial cancer risk stratification and management.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Uterine Cancer

Uterine cancers are classified into cancers of the corpus uteri (uterine carcinomas and carcinosarcoma) and corpus uteri (sarcomas) by the AJCC staging system (eighth edition). Endometrial carcinoma is the most common amongst these with prolonged estrogen exposure being a well-known risk factor. The FIGO staging system for endometrial carcinoma is primarily surgical and includes total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Imaging is useful in the preoperative evaluation of tumor stage, especially assessment of myometrial invasion and cervical stromal extension. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI with DWI has a high staging accuracy and is the preferred imaging modality for primary evaluation with contrast-enhanced CT abdomen being indicated for recurrent disease. PET/CT is considered superior in evaluation of lymph nodes and extra pelvic metastases.

Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (also known as endometrial cancer, or more broadly as uterine cancer or carcinoma of the uterine corpus) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States. It is estimated that 65,950 new uterine cancer cases will have occurred in 2022, with 12,550 deaths resulting from the disease. Endometrial carcinoma includes pure endometrioid cancer and carcinomas with high-risk endometrial histology (including uterine serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma [also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor], and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma). Stromal or mesenchymal sarcomas are uncommon subtypes accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms focuses on the diagnosis, staging, and management of pure endometrioid carcinoma. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms is available online at NCCN.org.

Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer is the second most common gynecologic cancer worldwide and the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, with an increasing incidence in high-income countries. Although the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer is a surgical staging system, contemporary published evidence-based data and expert opinions recommend MRI for treatment planning as it provides critical diagnostic information on tumor size and depth, extent of myometrial and cervical invasion, extrauterine extent, and lymph node status, all of which are essential in choosing the most appropriate therapy. Multiparametric MRI using a combination of T2-weighted sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is the mainstay for imaging assessment of endometrial cancer. Identification of important prognostic factors at MRI improves both treatment selection and posttreatment follow-up. MRI also plays a crucial role for fertility-preserving strategies and in patients who are not surgical candidates by helping guide therapy and identify procedural complications. This review is a product of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and reflects a multidisciplinary international collaborative effort to summarize updated information highlighting the role of MRI for endometrial cancer depiction and delineation, treatment planning, and follow-up. The article includes information regarding dedicated MRI protocols, tips for MRI reporting, imaging pitfalls, and strategies for image quality optimization. The roles of MRI-guided radiation therapy, hybrid PET/MRI, and advanced MRI techniques that are applicable to endometrial cancer imaging are also discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Application of MRI and CT Images in Surgical Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer

In order to understand the problems of the application of MRI and CT images in the early cervical cancer surgery, a method that the application of MRI imaging and CT images in early cervical cancer surgery was proposed. For the cervical cancer in clinical practice, the applications of the modern imaging examination and the clinical staging classification were investigated and analyzed. Compared with the surgical pathology results, the application value of common modern imaging in clinical staging of cervical cancer was evaluated. It was found that the sensitivity of MRI and CT in diagnosing lymph node metastasis was 56% and 58%, and the specificity was 93% and 92%, respectively. The experiment proved the application value of MRI and CT in clinical staging of cervical cancer.

SEOM-GEICO clinical guidelines on endometrial cancer (2021)

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common gynecological malignancy worldwide, the first in developed countries [Sung et al. in CA Cancer J Clin 71:209–249, 2021]. Although a majority is diagnosed at an early stage with a low risk of relapse, an important proportion of patients will relapse. Better knowledge of molecular abnormalities is crucial to identify high-risk groups in early stages as well as for recurrent or metastatic disease for whom adjuvant treatment must be personalized. The objective of this guide is to summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of EC, and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

Imaging to optimize gynecological radiation oncology

Gynecological cancers have particularly benefited from the increasing use of imaging to guide radiation treatment planning for both external beam radiation and brachytherapy. While the different gynecological cancers have varying use of imaging, certain trends predominate. CT represents an economical choice for evaluating initial disease extent or potential metastasis at follow-up, particularly for endometrial and ovarian cancers. F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT is particularly useful for assessing the initial disease extent and longer term treatment response of squamous predominant cancers, including cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers. With its excellent pelvic soft tissue discrimination, MRI provides the greatest assistance in evaluating the local extent of gynecological tumors, including initial evaluation for non-operative endometrial and vulvar cancer, and assessment before, after and during brachytherapy for cervix, locally recurrent endometrial, and primary vaginal cancers. With more limited availability of MRI, ultrasound can also help guide brachytherapy, particularly during procedures. The benefits of using imaging to better spare bone marrow or earlier assessment of treatment response are topics still being explored, in particular for cervical cancer. As imaging along with radiation oncology technologies continue to evolve and develop, such as with MRI-linacs and ultra high dose rate (FLASH) radiation, we may continue to see increasing use of imaging for advancing gynecological radiation oncology.

Staging of Endometrial Cancer Using Fusion T2-Weighted Images with Diffusion-Weighted Images: A Way to Avoid Gadolinium?

Simple Summary

This work aims to evaluate the utility of fusing T2-weighted images with diffusion-weighted images to determinate the depth of myometrial invasion and the stage of endometrial cancer. By showing its superior diagnostic performance, we aim to encourage its use in endometrial cancer staging, and, in the future, obviate the need for intravenous contrast medium administration.

Abstract

Endometrial cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide, and its prognosis depends on various factors, with myometrial invasion having a major impact on prognosis. Optimizing MRI protocols is essential, and it would be useful to improve the diagnostic accuracy without the need for other sequences. We conducted a retrospective, single-center study, which included a total of 87 patients with surgically confirmed primary endometrial cancer, and who had undergone a pre-operative pelvic MRI. All exams were read by an experienced radiologist dedicated to urogenital radiology, and the depth of myometrial invasion was evaluated using T2-Weighted Images (T2WI) and fused T2WI with Diffusion-Weighted Images (DWI). Both results were compared to histopathological evaluations. When comparing both sets of imaging (T2WI and fused T2WI-DWI images) in diagnosing myometrial invasion, the fused images had better accuracy, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). T2WI analysis correctly diagnosed 82.1% (70.6–88.7) of cases, compared to 92.1% correctly diagnosed cases with fused images (79.5–97.2). The addition of fused images to a standard MRI protocol improves the diagnostic accuracy of myometrial invasion depth, encouraging its use, since it does not require more acquisition time.

Role of Imaging in the Management of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most frequent gynecological malignancy worldwide with an overall favorable prognosis. However, there is a subgroup of patients with a higher rate of recurrence and worse prognosis who benefit from a specific pre- and post-treatment radiological evaluation that allows the adjustment of the therapeutic attitude towards the biology of the tumor.

The main factors that determine high-risk disease are non-endometrioid tumor histology, histopathological grade 3, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), myometrial invasion ≥50%, and cervical stroma involvement. Radiological evaluation helps identify high-risk cases prior to surgical staging and is an important tool both in pre-treatment and in case of clinical recurrence suspicion.

As for imaging techniques, both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI can assess local tumor extent while CT and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) help assess lymph nodes and distant metastases.

The central purpose of this article is to review the specific factors that determine high-risk endometrial cancer, and the main specificities in the pre-treatment and follow-up evaluation according to the most recent international guidelines.

A radiogenomics application for prognostic profiling of endometrial cancer

Prognostication is critical for accurate diagnosis and tailored treatment in endometrial cancer (EC). We employed radiogenomics to integrate preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, n = 487 patients) with histologic-, transcriptomic- and molecular biomarkers (n = 550 patients) aiming to identify aggressive tumor features in a study including 866 EC patients. Whole-volume tumor radiomic profiling from manually (radiologists) segmented tumors (n = 138 patients) yielded clusters identifying patients with high-risk histological features and poor survival. Radiomic profiling by a fully automated machine learning (ML)-based tumor segmentation algorithm (n = 336 patients) reproduced the same radiomic prognostic groups. From these radiomic risk-groups, an 11-gene high-risk signature was defined, and its prognostic role was reproduced in orthologous validation cohorts (n = 554 patients) and aligned with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular class with poor survival (copy-number-high/p53-altered). We conclude that MRI-based integrated radiogenomics profiling provides refined tumor characterization that may aid in prognostication and guide future treatment strategies in EC.

Endometrial cancer from early to advanced-stage disease: an update for radiologists

The purpose of this article is to review the current molecular classification of endometrial cancer, the imaging findings in early and advanced disease, and the current management strategies, focusing on the new systemic therapies for advanced EC. In recent years, the management of endometrial cancer has significantly changed. The molecular characterization of endometrial cancer has shed new light into the biologic behavior of this disease, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system was recently revised, and imaging was formally incorporated in the management of endometrial cancer. Recent genomic analysis of endometrial cancer led to the approval of new molecular-targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Imaging allows assessment of myometrial invasion, cervical stromal extension, lymph node involvement and distant metastases, and has a crucial role for treatment planning. Treatment strategies, which include surgery, radiation and systemic therapies are based on accurate staging and risk stratification.

Evaluation of the Depth of Myometrial Invasion of Endometrial Carcinoma: Comparison of Orthogonal Pelvis-axial Contrast-enhanced and Uterus-axial Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Protocols

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of orthogonal pelvis-axial (OPA) contrast-enhanced (CE) and orthogonal uterus-axial (OUA) dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion (MI) of endometrial carcinoma (EC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative MRI of 398 consecutive EC patients (197 patients with OPA CE-MRI protocol and 201 patients with OUA DCE-MRI protocol) was analyzed. Two radiologists independently interpreted the depth of MI, with postoperative histopathology as the reference standard. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for diagnostic performance comparison.

RESULTS

OUA DCE-MRI showed a significantly larger area under the curve than OPA CE-MRI in detecting the presence of MI for radiologist 1 (0.71 versus 0.49, p < 0.05) but not for radiologist 2 or deep MI (all p > 0.05). Compared to OPA CE-MRI, OUA DCE-MRI significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of non-MI and superficial MI (radiologist 1: 45.5% versus 0 and 88.7% versus 86.4%, p = 0.045 and 0.567, respectively; radiologist 2: 45.5% versus 12.5% and 88.7% versus 78.8%, p = 0.177 and 0.027, respectively) and of EC with adenomyosis/submucous myomas, cornual tumor, and antero-posterior diameter ≤ 10 mm (radiologist 1: 86.4% versus 71.4%, 91.2% versus 67.7%, and 90.1% versus 81.1%, p = 0.048, 0.018, and 0.081, respectively; radiologist 2: 86.4% versus 64.3%, 88.2% versus 64.5%, and 87.0% versus 71.6%, p = 0.006, 0.023, and 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The OUA DCE-MRI protocol was superior to the OPA CE-MRI protocol in assessing the depth of MI of EC.