Sexual-orientation based discrimination is associated with anxiety and depression in young physicians. A national study

Suicidal ideation risk among LGB Spanish university students: The role of childhood and adolescence adversities and mental disorders

BACKGROUND

Childhood/adolescence adversities and mental disorders are higher among LGB youths.

AIMS

To evaluate the role of childhood maltreatment, bullying, and mental disorders on the association between sexual orientation and suicidal ideation (SI); and the role of mental disorders on the association between sexual orientation discrimination and SI.

METHODS

Baseline and 12-month follow-up online surveys of Spanish first-year university students (18-24-year-olds). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the effects of childhood/adolescence adversities and mental disorders in the relationship between sexual orientation, discrimination and SI.

RESULTS

A total of 1224 students were included (16.4 % LGBs). Risk factors of lifetime SI were sexual orientation (OR 2.4), any bullying (OR 2.4), any childhood maltreatment (OR 4.0), and any mental disorders (OR 3.8). Final model Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.78. Among homosexual and bisexual students, discrimination showed increased risk of 12-month SI (OR 2.2), but this effect was no longer statistically significant when any 12-month mental disorder was added (OR 7.8). Final model AUC 0.72.

LIMITATIONS

Sample of interest was relatively small. But it was similar to comparable studies and statistical adjustments have been performed. Assessment of mental disorders and SI was not based on clinical assessment. However, validated scales showing good diagnostic agreement with clinical judgement were used.

CONCLUSIONS

Childhood/adolescence adversities and mental disorders interact in the association between sexual orientation and SI. Mental disorders may mediate the association between sexual orientation discrimination and SI. Further research using larger samples and causal modelling approach assessing the mediators of SI risk among LGBs is needed.

Prevalence and factors associated with gender incongruence in French healthcare professionals: results from a nationwide survey

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore gender incongruence among French healthcare professionals and its associated factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Nationwide online cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

Healthcare professionals were recruited from May 2, 2021, to June 30, 2021, through social networks, professional networks, and email invitations. A multivariate regression model was used to analyze the association between gender incongruence and socio-demographic, professional, mental health, and addiction behavior factors.

RESULTS

The study included 10,325 healthcare professionals, indicating a prevalence of gender incongruence at 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-2.9%). In multivariate analyses, we found that healthcare professionals with gender incongruence, when compared to their counterparts, exhibited the following characteristics: they were more frequently male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.88, 95% CI: [1.42-2.48], p < 0.001), less frequently physicians (aOR = 0.18, 95%CI: [0.11-0.29], p < 0.001), health executives (aOR = 0.51 [0.34-0.77], p = 0.001), nurses (aOR = 0.47, 95%CI: [0.33-0.68], p < 0.001), and other allied professionals (aOR = 0.33, 95%CI [0.23-0.49], p < 0.001) than nurse assistants, they consumed antidepressants more frequently (aOR = 1.52, 95%CI: [1.02-2.26], p = 0.041) and were more likely to be tobacco smokers (aOR = 1.34 (1.02-1.77), p = 0.035). We did not observe any significant associations with age, hazardous drinking, sustained bullying at the work place, or sexual-orientation-based discrimination (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Gender incongruence should be taken into account at the management, colleague, or institution levels. We found that the professionals reporting gender incongruence consumed more antidepressants and smoked more, which may indicate a certain level of distress that warrants further investigation.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

IRB n°C08/21.01.06.93911, CNIL. The protocol was published DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.001.

TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The protocol was published DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.001.

Burnout, Mental Health, and Workplace Discrimination in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, Intersex, and Asexual Anesthesiologists

Increasing attention is being paid to both anesthesiologist well-being and commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Sexual minorities (ie, members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, intersex, and asexual [LGBTQIA] communities) face many challenges in society and the workplace, including mental health conditions, discrimination, and increased risk for burnout. In this review, we outline the current state of mental health conditions and burnout in sexual minority individuals, discrimination and harassment faced both in society and the workplace, and steps that workplaces can take to become more inclusive and welcoming.

Standing out or fitting in: A latent projective content analysis of discrimination of women and 2SLGBTQ+ anesthesiologists and providers

INTRODUCTION

Discrimination toward sex and gender minority anesthesiologists and anesthesia trainees exists. Potential reasons for this discrimination are unclear and incompletely characterized. This study sought to better understand what discrimination looks like for sex and gender minorities in anesthesiology and the culture within anesthesiology that allows this discrimination to occur.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With institutional research ethics board approval and informed consent, we performed a qualitative analysis of free-text responses from a previously-published internet-based cross-sectional survey distributed to Canadian anesthesiology residents, fellows, and staff. The purpose of this survey was to characterize intersections between respondent gender or sexuality with experiences of discrimination in the workplace. Separate analysis of qualitative and quantitative components of this survey was planned a priori, and the quantitative component was published elsewhere. Free-text responses were independently coded by two researchers and subsequently synthesized into emerging themes using latent projective content analysis sensitized by Butler's theory of performativity.

RESULTS

Out of 490 free-text responses from 171 respondents [140 (81.9%) identifying as heterosexual], two themes emerged: i) fitting in: performativity reinforcing the status quo, and ii) standing out: performativity as a means of disruptive social change. Power structures were observed to favour individuals who "fit in" with the normative performances of gender and/or sexuality.

DISCUSSION

Our study illuminates how individuals whose performances of gender and sexuality "fit in" with those expected normative performances reinforce a workplace culture that advantages them, whereas individuals whose performances of gender and sexuality "stand out" disproportionately experience discrimination. The dismantling of bias and discrimination in the anesthesiology workplace requires individuals (a) who are empowered within their workplace because they "fit in" with the majority; (b) who recognize discrimination toward communities of their peers and/or colleagues; and (c) who actively choose to "stand out".

Physicians' Experiences With Mistreatment and Discrimination by Patients, Families, and Visitors and Association With Burnout

Importance

Burnout is common among physicians and is associated with suboptimal patient outcomes. Little is known about how experiences with patients, families, and visitors differ by physician characteristics or contribute to the risk of burnout.

Objective

To examine the occurrence of mistreatment and discrimination by patients, families, and visitors by physician characteristics and the association between such interactions and experiencing burnout.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 20, 2020, to March 23, 2021, among US physicians.

Exposures

Mistreatment and discrimination were measured using items adapted from the Association of American Medical College's Graduation Questionnaire with an additional item querying respondents about refusal of care because of the physicians' personal attributes; higher score indicated greater exposure to mistreatment and discrimination.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Burnout as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory.

Results

Of 6512 responding physicians, 2450 (39.4%) were female, and 369 (7.2%) were Hispanic; 681 (13.3%) were non-Hispanic Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander; and 3633 (70.5%) were non-Hispanic White individuals. Being subjected to racially or ethnically offensive remarks (1849 [29.4%]), offensive sexist remarks (1810 [28.7%]), or unwanted sexual advances (1291 [20.5%]) by patients, families, or visitors at least once in the previous year were common experiences. Approximately 1 in 5 physicians (1359 [21.6%]) had experienced a patient or their family refusing to allow them to provide care because of the physician's personal attributes at least once in the previous year. On multivariable analyses, female physicians (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.02-2.69) and ethnic and racial minority physicians (eg, Black or African American: OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.13-2.23) were more likely to report mistreatment or discrimination in the previous year. Experience of mistreatment or discrimination was independently associated with higher odds of burnout (vs score of 0 [no mistreatment], score of 1: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.55; score of 2: OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.38-2.08; score of 3: OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.89-2.57). There was no difference in the odds of burnout by gender after controlling for experiencing mistreatment and discrimination score and other demographic factors, specialty, practice setting, work hours, and frequency of overnight call.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, mistreatment and discrimination by patients, families, and visitors were common, especially for female and racial and ethnic minority physicians, and associated with burnout. Efforts to mitigate physician burnout should include attention to patient and visitor conduct.

Work environment and mental health in nurse assistants, nurses and health executives: results from the AMADEUS study

AIM

To explore work environment and mental health in nurse assistants, nurses and health executives in a national large-scale study.

BACKGROUND

We have data for physicians but not for other healthcare workers categories.

METHODS

6935 participants were recruited between 2021 May and June by professional mailings and professional networks.

RESULTS

All professional categories reported high rates of high psychological demand (>90%), low social support (>60%) burnout (50 to 60%), exposure to potentially morally injurious events (>40%) depression (approximately 30%). Surgery nurses reported the highest exposure to potentially morally injurious events. Major depression was identified in approximately 30% of participants in all categories but less than 10% reported consuming antidepressants. 31 to 49% of participants reported sleep disorders and 16 to 21% reported consuming regularly hypnotics. Physicians reported high hazardous drinking behavior and nurse assistant high smoking rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Our results suggest that preventing burnout and depression in healthcare workers is a priority. To reach this goal, nursing managers could develop some interventions to reduce psychological demand and increase personal accomplishment and social support between colleagues, prevent sustained bullying at the workplace and health risk behaviors. These interventions should be further developed and evaluated.

[Influence of the work environment on burn-out and depression in nurses]

Burn out is defined as a state of psychological exhaustion in the face of an unfavourable work environment. In the health sector, this includes, among other things, an excessive care burden, the lack of autonomy or control over work, the vicious circle of absenteeism, the lack of support, moral and sexual harassment, discrimination or the Covid-19 health crisis. Burn-out also increases the risk of depression among care workers.

Risk factors for burnout and depression in healthcare workers: The national AMADEUS study protocol

CONTEXT

Burnout is an international phenomenon defined as a state of professional exhaustion. It can lead to depression and have major economic and organizational impacts. Previous studies of healthcare professionals in France have focused on physicians, but none to date have explored other healthcare professions.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of our study is to determine the prevalence of burnout among healthcare workers. The secondary objectives are to explore the associations of burnout with professional and psycho-social factors and the risk of depression, professional harassment, sexual harassment, sexual-orientation based discrimination, consumption of antidepressants, anxiolytics and also the lifestyle of the individual: smoking, alcohol consumption, coffee consumption, physical activity and sleep quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey will take the form of a voluntary and anonymous online questionnaire carried out on the FramaForm1® platform and will be disseminated via social networks, professional networks and mailings.

STUDY POPULATION

Senior doctors, interns, directors of care, nurses, head nurses and senior head nurses, physiotherapists and occupational therapists, dieticians, radiology technicians, laboratory technicians, psychologists, nurses' aides, auxiliary nurses and midwives will be included.

COLLECTED DATA

Burnout will be measured with the Maslach Inventory burnout (MBI) questionnaire, work environment with the Karasek questionnaire and anxiety, depression risk with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies- Depression (CES-D), physical activity with the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) and sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

ETHICS

This protocol has been accepted by the ethical committee (IRB n°C08/21.01.06.93911, CNIL).

EXPECTED RESULTS

Based on international studies, we expect a high rate of burnout with disparities according to profession, socio-demographic data, seniority and type of service. We also expect a significant rate of untreated depression. This study will provide evidence for policy makers to implement collective strategies to reduce burnout and depression in the different populations studied.