Neurocognitive heterogeneity in 7-year-old children at familial high risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: The Danish high risk and resilience study - VIA 7

Psychosis-linked Symptoms and Structural Brain Patterns in Cognitive Subgroups among Familial High-Risk Children in the ABCD Study

Objective

Children at familial high risk for psychosis (FHR) are at substantially increased risk for psychotic disorders and other serious mental illnesses. Identifying risk subgroups within FHR youth may enhance prediction models to identify children at greatest risk for potential intervention. This study investigated psychosis-linked symptoms and structural brain patterns in neurocognitive subgroups among FHR children in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study using baseline, 2-year, and 4-year follow-up data.

Methods

Among children with first- and second-degree family history of psychosis, neurocognitive subgroups were defined using NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery baseline age-corrected total scores: children with low (FHR-LC, 0-33%, n=234), moderate (FHR-MC, 33-66%, n=261), and high (FHR-HC, 66-100%, n=277) cognitive performance. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed using Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version (PQ-BC) and Childhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Regional vulnerability indices (SSD-RVIs), which quantify the similarity of participants' structural brain patterns to the patterns found in adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, were calculated using cortical thickness measures following rigorous quality control.

Results

At baseline, FHR-LC had significantly higher PQ-BC and CBCL scores, and trend-level higher SSD-RVIs compared to FHR-HC. Longitudinally, PQ-BC and CBCL scores decreased with age across all FHR participants, while SSD-RVIs remained stable. No longitudinal cognitive subgroup-by-age interactions were observed, indicating that subgroup differences persisted over time.

Conclusion

Children at FHR who have concurrent poor cognitive performance exhibit elevated and stable clinical and imaging psychosis risk markers. This suggests that they may represent a risk subgroup with elevated vulnerability, presenting an opportunity for early identification and intervention.

Familial High-Risk for Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder Amongst Youth in an Academic Healthcare System: A Real-World Assessment of Clinical Characteristics and Implications for Clinical Care

OBJECTIVE

Family history is amongst the most significant risk factors for psychotic and bipolar disorders. Despite being clearly defined, easily and early identifiable, familial high-risk status is minimally accounted for in mainstream prevention paradigms. This study reports on the demographics and clinical characteristics of youth with a first-degree relative affected by psychotic or bipolar disorders within a large academic healthcare system.

METHOD

In this quality improvement study, using electronic medical records, the authors examined demographics, psychiatric and medical diagnoses, substance use, service utilisation, and psychotropic medication use in children, adolescents and young adults (age 24 or younger) with and without a family history of psychotic or bipolar disorders within the Mass General Brigham (MGB) healthcare system.

RESULTS

Family history-positive (FHP) youth demonstrated markedly higher rates of psychiatric problems (57.8%) compared to family history-negative (FHN) youth (8.5%), including higher rates of psychotic and bipolar disorders, as well as anxiety disorders and depression. FHP youth also had more frequent psychotropic medication use and medical problems. Additionally, FHP youth reported higher cannabis and alcohol use, along with higher rates of suicidal ideation and trauma. Despite this, only 4% of FHP youth visited an MGB psychiatry or psychology department within the six months preceding the analysis.

CONCLUSION

FHP youth constitute a distinct and practically identifiable risk cohort within a large academic healthcare system. Increased psychiatric and medical problems coupled with more prevalent risk factors amongst familial high-risk youth highlight the need for tailored clinical programmes to achieve both primary and secondary prevention.

The development in rating-based executive functions in children at familial high risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder from age 7 to age 11: the Danish high risk and resilience study

Executive functions (EF) deficits are well documented in children at familial high risk of schizophrenia (FHR-SZ), and to a lesser degree in children at familial high risk of bipolar disorder (FHR-BP). The aim of this study was to assess EF development in preadolescent children at FHR-SZ, FHR-BP and population-based controls (PBC) using a multi-informant rating scale. A total of 519 children (FHR-SZ, n = 201; FHR-BP, n = 119; PBC, n = 199) participated at age 7, at age 11 or at both time points. Caregivers and teachers completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF). The developmental pattern from age 7 to age 11, did not differ between groups. At age 11, caregivers and teachers rated children at FHR-SZ as having widespread EF deficits. A higher proportion of children at FHR-SZ had clinically significant scores on the General executive composite (GEC) and all BRIEF indices compared to PBC. According to the caregivers, children at FHR-BP had significantly more EF deficits than PBC on 9 out of 13 BRIEF scales, whereas according to teachers, they only had significantly more deficits on one subdomain (Initiate). Likewise, caregivers rated a significantly higher proportion of children at FHR-BP above the clinical cut-off on the GEC and Metacognition index, compared to PBC, whereas there were no significant differences according to teachers. This study highlights the relevance of including multi-informant rating scales in the assessment of EF in children at FHR-SZ and FHR-BP. The results imply a need to identify children at high risk who would benefit from targeted intervention.

Working memory heterogeneity from age 7 to 11 in children at familial high risk of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder- The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the genetic overlap between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, working memory impairments are mainly found in children of parents with schizophrenia. However, working memory impairments are characterized by substantial heterogeneity, and it is unknown how this heterogeneity develops over time. We used a data-driven approach to assess working memory heterogeneity and longitudinal stability in children at familial high risk of schizophrenia (FHR-SZ) or bipolar disorder (FHR-BP).

METHODS

Based on the performances on four working memory tasks by 319 children (FHR-SZ, N = 202, FHR-BP, N = 118) measured at age 7 and 11, latent profile transition analysis was used to test for the presence of subgroups, and the stability of subgroup membership over time. Population-based controls (VIA 7, N = 200, VIA 11, N = 173) were included as a reference group. The working memory subgroups were compared based on caregiver- and teacher ratings of everyday working memory function, and dimensional psychopathology.

RESULTS

A model with three subgroups characterized by different levels of working memory function (an impaired subgroup, a mixed subgroup, and an above average subgroup) best fitted the data. The impaired subgroup had the highest ratings of everyday working memory impairments and psychopathology. Overall, 98 % (N = 314) stayed in the same subgroup from age 7 to 11.

CONCLUSION

Persistent working memory impairments are present in a subset of children at FHR-SZ and FHR-BP throughout middle childhood. Attention should be given to these children, as working memory impairments influence daily life, and may serve as a vulnerability marker of transition to severe mental illness.

Neurocognitive Subgroups in Children at Familial High-risk of Schizophrenia or Bipolar disorder: Subgroup Membership Stability or Change From Age 7 to 11-The Danish High Risk and Resilience Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Subgroups with distinct levels of neurocognitive functioning exist in children of parents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. However, studies investigating the temporal stability of subgroup membership are currently lacking. We hypothesized that a minority of children at familial high-risk of schizophrenia (FHR-SZ) or bipolar disorder (FHR-BP) would transition to a different neurocognitive subgroup from age 7 to 11 and that most transitions would be to a more impaired subgroup.

STUDY DESIGN

Latent profile analysis was used to identify subgroups at two assessments (age 7 and 11) based on the performance of 320 children at FHR-SZ or FHR-BP across eight neurocognitive functions. Temporal stability in subgroup membership was evaluated with latent profile transition analysis. Population-based controls (age 7, n = 199; age 11, n = 178) were included as a reference group. Children transitioning to a more impaired subgroup were compared with nontransitioning children on sex, FHR-status, global functioning, and psychopathology.

STUDY RESULTS

At both assessment points, we identified three subgroups based on neurocognitive performance: a moderately-severely impaired, a mildly impaired, and an above-average subgroup. A total of 12.8% of children transitioned to a different subgroup, of which the majority (85.2%) moved to a more impaired subgroup. Parental diagnosis of schizophrenia, but neither parental diagnosis of bipolar disorder, global functioning at age 7, psychopathology, nor sex significantly differentiated children transitioning to a more impaired subgroup from nontransitioning children.

CONCLUSIONS

During pre-adolescence, neurocognitive developmental lag is associated with being at FHR-SZ. Close attention to these children's neurocognitive development is indicated.