Child and parent secondary outcomes in stepped care versus standard care treatment for childhood trauma

Suicidal Ideation, Clinical Worsening and Outcomes among Child Participants in Trauma-Focused Treatment

Research on clinical trajectories of children with suicidal ideation (SI) and clinical worsening (CW) during cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for childhood trauma is limited. The current study utilized secondary data from a randomized clinical trial comparing Trauma-Focused CBT versus Stepped care CBT to examine (1) clinical profile and outcomes of children with SI, recurrent thoughts of death/dying, and past attempts; and (2) clinical worsening during treatment and difference in outcomes. Children (ages 4-12) and their parents (N = 183) participated and 132 completed treatment. Interviews assessing SI, thoughts of death/dying, past attempts, and number/type of trauma were conducted with children (ages 7-12) and parents. Outcome measures (baseline and post-treatment) completed by parents included child posttraumatic stress symptoms, impairment, and internalizing and externalizing problems and an independent evaluator rated overall severity. Children (ages 7-12), parents and therapists completed ratings during treatment that indicated CW. Results did not differ by treatment group; thus, the pooled sample was used. Children with SI at baseline had higher severity than children without. For completers, no children (n = 14) with SI at baseline had SI at post-treatment. Child (n = 3) and therapist (n = 5) ratings of CW were low. Eighteen children (13.64%) were rated as CW by parents. Most ratings occurred at the beginning of treatment. Children with therapist ratings of CW had higher internalizing problems. Findings suggest that children with SI and CW can improve from trauma-focused CBT. More research is needed on the clinical trajectory of children with SI and trauma, and on clinical tools to monitor CW. Clinical trial registration information: https://clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02537678.

The therapist role in parent-led cognitive behavioral therapy for children after trauma: treating trauma from a distance

This article examines the therapist experience of their role in providing Stepped Care Cognitive-Behavioral-Therapy for Children after Trauma (SC-CBT-CT), a semi-homebased, parent-led trauma-treatment for children (7-12). Previous research has documented that parent-led, therapist-assisted psychological interventions are an acceptable and effective type of service delivery. Yet, the therapist perspective on their role when providing parent-led treatments has received limited research attention. Attention is therefore directed to the therapist experience of engaging parents, establishing relationships, and working with children's trauma narratives from a distance-through the engagement of parents. The data material consists of semi-structured interviews with SC-CBT-CT therapists. To identify patterns of experience, thought, and viewpoints in the overall data, a stepwise thematic analysis approach was applied. Two core themes emerged: 1) Perceptions of therapeutic control and therapeutic presence when engaging parents to lead their own children through an exposure-based program; 2) Establishment and maintenance of therapeutic alliances with and between parents and children. Although parents are inherently well-positioned to engage with their own children about trauma, the article highlights that treatment adherence, progression, and perseverance is contingent upon systematic therapist guidance, monitoring, and availability for support and problem-solving.

The bidirectional associations between caregiver and child symptoms in the parent-led treatment stepping together for children after trauma

BACKGROUND

An innovative approach to child trauma treatment in which caregivers are allocated treatment tasks has shown promising results, but less is known about the bidirectional associations between caregiver and child symptoms during treatment.

METHODS

Eighty-two child-caregiver dyads who participated in the parent-led therapist-assisted Stepping Together for Children after Trauma (ST-CT) were included (child age: 7-12 years, mean = 9.9 years). Caregivers' emotional reactions and anxiety/depression and children's posttraumatic stress (PTS) and depression were assessed pretreatment, mid-treatment, and posttreatment. We investigated the possible directional associations between caregivers' emotional reactions and anxiety/depression and children's PTS and depression using random intercept cross-lagged panel models.

RESULTS

Symptoms improved in both caregivers and children. Lower levels of caregiver emotional reactions at pretreatment predicted improved child PTS at mid-treatment; lower levels of caregiver emotional reactions at mid-treatment predicted improved child depression at posttreatment; and lower levels of child PTS at mid-treatment predicted improved caregiver emotional reactions at posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that caregivers and children can impact each other's responses to a parent-led child trauma-focused treatment. Notably, children with caregivers who were less affected by their own emotional reactions exhibited greater improvement in both PTS and depression. Supporting the caregivers may benefit both children and caregivers.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04073862; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04073862.

The role of family accommodation in child posttraumatic stress symptoms and functional impairment in the context of cognitive behavioral therapy

BACKGROUND

Caregiver behaviors such as family accommodation (FA) are negatively reinforced by reduced distress in the short term, but ultimately maintain symptoms. It is important to explore the role of FA on symptoms and impairment. The current study examined the relationship among FA, posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), and functional impairment in a sample of children and their caregivers who completed trauma treatment.

METHOD

Participants included 183 children and their caregivers (M age = 7.89; 55.19 % female; 73.22 % non-Hispanic; 51.37 % White). Data consisted of parent-reported measures collected at baseline, post-treatment, and 12-month follow-up from a randomized control trial (RCT) comparing Stepped Care CBT for Children after Trauma and Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavior Therapy (TF-CBT). Correlational, mediation, and hierarchical linear regression analyses were conducted to test the interrelationships among FA, child PTSS, and child functional impairment.

RESULTS

FA was significantly, positively associated with total PTSS and functional impairment at baseline. Baseline FA partially mediated the relationship between baseline total PTSS and baseline functional impairment. Lastly, greater pre- to post-treatment changes in FA were mostly associated with relevant outcome variables at post-treatment and 12-month follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

Study limitations include use of a single informant, cross-sectional data analysis, lack of differentiation among trauma types, concerns regarding generalizability.

CONCLUSION

Assessing FA may be a helpful tool in better understanding how child PTSS relates to functional impairment following exposure to trauma. This study is clinically relevant it offers insight on the relationship among FA, PTSS, and functional impairment for families involved in trauma treatment.

History of trauma is a critical treatment target for individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis

People meeting criteria for a clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis syndrome frequently represent a heterogeneous, help-seeking, and dynamic population. Among the numerous symptoms and risk factors for psychosis, exposure to trauma stands out as both highly prevalent and poorly understood. Indeed, while up to 80% of individuals meeting criteria for a CHR syndrome report trauma histories, there is currently limited research dedicated to this specific area. This is particularly problematic as trauma is tied to risk for conversion, leads to a range of clinical issues, and contributes to disability and poor quality of life. Fortunately, recent research in the general population has led to a significant evolution in the way trauma is assessed and understood, and further, some studies have indicated that targeted trauma interventions in formal psychotic disorders are highly effective. However, direct adoption is challenging as the CHR syndrome holds a number of unique concerns (e.g., clinical heterogeneity, developmental trauma), and characteristically, involves a developing pediatric or young adult population that also comes with specific considerations (e.g., living with caregivers, transitionary period in roles). In this "perspective" we frame the issues around understanding trauma in CHR individuals, discuss viable treatments and unique considerations, and provide suggestions for future steps in developing and incorporating trauma-focused interventions in this population.