1
|
Zahn R. The psychopathology of mood disorders: implications for identifying neurocognitive intervention targets. J Affect Disord 2025:119423. [PMID: 40383302 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.119423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2025] [Accepted: 05/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/20/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurofeedback and neuromodulation treatments are of increasing clinical interest, but their neurocognitive targets are poorly understood. METHODS In this review, we will use Jaspers' phenomenological psychopathology combined with modern network analysis to identify neurocognitive treatment targets by focussing on distinctive and necessary symptoms of mood disorders as well as their subsyndromal and prognostic variations. RESULTS We discuss the early descriptions of Kraepelin's mixed affective states and suggest a model of four mood states (depressed, anxious, irritable, and elated) and their dynamic evolution and mixing. Blame and praise internalisation and externalisation biases are proposed as key mechanisms underpinning mood states, together with approach/withdrawal-related action tendencies. Whilst self-worth and interest emerge as the most distinctive symptom dimensions, that are necessary for bipolar and recurrent unipolar depressive disorders, we also discuss anxiety as a potential primary symptom in a subgroup of chronic depression. Based on a neuroanatomical model of the conceptual self, anterior temporal and subgenual networks and their importance for self-blame and worthlessness, as well as the hypothesised role of septo-hypothalamic networks for affiliative interest are discussed. The latter is distinguished from ventral striatal networks as relevant for more general approach-related action tendencies and hedonic interest (anticipatory anhedonia). Finally, recent target validation from early-stage fMRI neurofeedback trials are reviewed. LIMITATIONS It was not feasible to employ a systematic review approach. CONCLUSIONS Neurofeedback studies are not only of interest as new treatments, but also for enhancing our pathophysiological understanding and could gain clinical impact with ongoing advances in scalable neurotechnologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roland Zahn
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, Centre for Affective Disorders, King's College London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London BR3 3BX, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Langhammer T, Unterfeld C, Blankenburg F, Erk S, Fehm L, Haynes JD, Heinzel S, Hilbert K, Jacobi F, Kathmann N, Knaevelsrud C, Renneberg B, Ritter K, Stenzel N, Walter H, Lueken U. Design and methods of the research unit 5187 PREACT (towards precision psychotherapy for non-respondent patients: from signatures to predictions to clinical utility) - a study protocol for a multicentre observational study in outpatient clinics. BMJ Open 2025; 15:e094110. [PMID: 40010810 PMCID: PMC11865781 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) works-but not equally well for all patients. Less than 50% of patients with internalising disorders achieve clinically meaningful improvement, with negative consequences for patients and healthcare systems. The research unit (RU) 5187 seeks to improve this situation by an in-depth investigation of the phenomenon of treatment non-response (TNR) to CBT. We aim to identify bio-behavioural signatures associated with TNR, develop predictive models applicable to individual patients and enhance the utility of predictive analytics by collecting a naturalistic cohort with high ecological validity for the outpatient sector. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The RU is composed of nine subprojects (SPs), spanning from clinical, machine learning and neuroimaging science and service projects to particular research questions on psychological, electrophysiological/autonomic, digital and neural signatures of TNR. The clinical study SP 1 comprises a four-centre, prospective-longitudinal observational trial where we recruit a cohort of 585 patients with a wide range of internalising disorders (specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unipolar depressive disorders) using minimal exclusion criteria. Our experimental focus lies on emotion (dys)-regulation as a putative key mechanism of CBT and TNR. We use state-of-the-art machine learning methods to achieve single-patient predictions, incorporating pretrained convolutional neural networks for high-dimensional neuroimaging data and multiple kernel learning to integrate information from various modalities. The RU aims to advance precision psychotherapy by identifying emotion regulation-based biobehavioural markers of TNR, setting up a multilevel assessment for optimal predictors and using an ecologically valid sample to apply findings in diverse clinical settings, thereby addressing the needs of vulnerable patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (approval no. 2021-01) and the Ethics Committee of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (approval no. EA1/186/22).Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. Deidentified data and analysis scripts will be made available to researchers within the RU via a secure server, in line with ethical guidelines and participant consent. In compliance with European and German data protection regulations, patient data will not be publicly available through open science frameworks but may be shared with external researchers on reasonable request and under appropriate data protection agreements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00030915.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Langhammer
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chantal Unterfeld
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Blankenburg
- Neurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Erk
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lydia Fehm
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Stephan Heinzel
- Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Kevin Hilbert
- Department of Psychology, HMU Health and Medical University Erfurt GmbH, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Frank Jacobi
- Psychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Kathmann
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Knaevelsrud
- Clinical Psychology Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Berlin-Potsdam Partner Site, Berlin, Germany
| | - Babette Renneberg
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Berlin-Potsdam Partner Site, Berlin, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Ritter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Hertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Henrik Walter
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Lueken
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Berlin-Potsdam Partner Site, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fang A, Anderson RE, Carter S, Eckstrand K, Hsu KJ, Jones S, Kryza-Lacombe M, Peckham A, Siegle GJ, Uddin LQ, Weierich M, Woody ML, Illes J. Bioethical and critical consciousness in clinical translational neuroscience. J Clin Transl Sci 2025; 9:e37. [PMID: 40052052 PMCID: PMC11883569 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2025.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2024] [Revised: 12/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Clinical translational neuroscience (CTN) is positioned to generate novel discoveries for advancing treatments for mental health disorders, but it is held back today by the siloing of bioethical considerations from critical consciousness. In this article, we suggest that bioethical and critical consciousness can be paired to intersect with structures of power within which science and clinical practice are conducted. We examine barriers to the adoption of neuroscience findings in mental health from this perspective, especially in the context of current collective attention to widespread disparities in the access to and outcomes of mental health services, lack of representation of marginalized populations in the relevant sectors of the workforce, and the importance of knowledge that draws upon multicultural perspectives. We provide 10 actionable solutions to confront these barriers in CTN research, as informed by existing frameworks such as structural competency, adaptive calibration models, and community-based participatory research. By integrating critical consciousness with bioethical considerations, we believe that practitioners will be better positioned to benefit from cutting-edge research in the biological and social sciences than in the past, alert to biases and equipped to mitigate them, and poised to shepherd in a robust generation of future translational therapies and practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Shawn Jones
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Maria Kryza-Lacombe
- Veterans Affairs Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Centers, San Francisco, CA, USA
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Peckham
- U.S Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Greg J. Siegle
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Judy Illes
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sulzer J, Papageorgiou TD, Goebel R, Hendler T. Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2024; 379:20230081. [PMID: 39428881 PMCID: PMC11491839 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Neurofeedback (NF) is endogenous neuromodulation of circumscribed brain circuitry. While its use of real-time brain activity in a closed-loop system is similar to brain-computer interfaces, instead of controlling an external device like the latter, the goal of NF is to change a targeted brain function. In this special issue on NF, we present current and future methods for extracting and manipulating neural function, how these methods may reveal new insights about brain function, applications, and rarely discussed ethical considerations of guiding and interpreting the brain activity of others. Together, the articles in this issue outline the possibilities of NF use and impact in the real world, poising to influence the development of more effective and personalized NF protocols, improving the understanding of underlying psychological and neurological mechanisms and enhancing treatment precision for various neurological and psychiatric conditions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Neurofeedback: new territories and neurocognitive mechanisms of endogenous neuromodulation'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Sulzer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, MetroHealth Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - T. Dorina Papageorgiou
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center for Space Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Neuroengineering Research Initiative, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rainer Goebel
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Talma Hendler
- School of Psychological Science, Faculty of Health and Medical Science and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Sagol Brain Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trambaiolli L, Maffei C, Dann E, Biazoli C, Bezgin G, Yendiki A, Haber S. Translation of monosynaptic circuits underlying amygdala fMRI neurofeedback training. Neuropsychopharmacology 2024; 49:1839-1850. [PMID: 39103495 PMCID: PMC11473645 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-024-01944-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Revised: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
fMRI neurofeedback using autobiographical memory recall to upregulate the amygdala is associated with resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) changes between the amygdala and the salience and default mode networks (SN and DMN, respectively). We hypothesize the existence of anatomical circuits underlying these rsFC changes. Using a cross-species brain parcellation, we identified in non-human primates locations homologous to the regions of interest (ROIs) from studies showing pre-to-post-neurofeedback changes in rsFC with the left amygdala. We injected bidirectional tracers in the basolateral, lateral, and central amygdala nuclei of adult macaques and used bright- and dark-field microscopy to identify cells and axon terminals in each ROI (SN: anterior cingulate, ventrolateral, and insular cortices; DMN: temporal pole, middle frontal gyrus, angular gyrus, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, hippocampus, and thalamus). We also performed additional injections in specific ROIs to validate the results following amygdala injections and delineate potential disynaptic pathways. Finally, we used high-resolution diffusion MRI data from four post-mortem macaque brains and one in vivo human brain to translate our findings to the neuroimaging domain. Different amygdala nuclei had significant monosynaptic connections with all the SN and DMN ipsilateral ROIs. Amygdala connections with the DMN contralateral ROIs are disynaptic through the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus. Diffusion MRI in both species benefitted from using the ground-truth tracer data to validate its findings, as we identified false-negative ipsilateral and false-positive contralateral connectivity results. This study provides the foundation for future causal investigations of amygdala neurofeedback modulation of the SN and DMN through these anatomic connections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Trambaiolli
- McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Dann
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudinei Biazoli
- Center for Mathematics Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gleb Bezgin
- Neuroinformatics for Personalized Medicine lab, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Anastasia Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Suzanne Haber
- McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krause F, Linden DEJ, Hermans EJ. Getting stress-related disorders under control: the untapped potential of neurofeedback. Trends Neurosci 2024; 47:766-776. [PMID: 39261131 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2024.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 07/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
Stress-related disorders are among the biggest global health challenges. Despite significant progress in understanding their neurocognitive basis, the promise of applying insights from fundamental research to prevention and treatment remains largely unfulfilled. We argue that neurofeedback - a method for training voluntary control over brain activity - has the potential to fill this translational gap. We provide a contemporary perspective on neurofeedback as endogenous neuromodulation that can target complex brain network dynamics, is transferable to real-world scenarios outside a laboratory or treatment facility, can be trained prospectively, and is individually adaptable. This makes neurofeedback a prime candidate for a personalized preventive neuroscience-based intervention strategy that focuses on the ecological momentary neuromodulation of stress-related brain networks in response to actual stressors in real life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Krause
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - David E J Linden
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erno J Hermans
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morrissey G, Tsuchiyagaito A, Takahashi T, McMillin J, Aupperle RL, Misaki M, Khalsa SS. Could neurofeedback improve therapist-patient communication? Considering the potential for neuroscience informed examinations of the psychotherapeutic relationship. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024; 161:105680. [PMID: 38641091 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Empathic communication between a patient and therapist is an essential component of psychotherapy. However, finding objective neural markers of the quality of the psychotherapeutic relationship have been elusive. Here we conceptualize how a neuroscience-informed approach involving real-time neurofeedback, facilitated via existing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) technologies, could provide objective information for facilitating therapeutic rapport. We propose several neurofeedback-assisted psychotherapy (NF-AP) approaches that could be studied as a way to optimize the experience of the individual patient and therapist across the spectrum of psychotherapeutic treatment. Finally, we consider how the possible strengths of these approaches are balanced by their current limitations and discuss the future prospects of NF-AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aki Tsuchiyagaito
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Oxley College of Health and Natural Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Toru Takahashi
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - John McMillin
- Advocate Medical Group, Downers Grove, IL, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Robin L Aupperle
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Oxley College of Health and Natural Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Masaya Misaki
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Oxley College of Health and Natural Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Sahib S Khalsa
- Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA; Oxley College of Health and Natural Sciences, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.
| |
Collapse
|