1
|
Reza L, Gottgens K, Kleijnen J, Breukink S, Ambe PC, Aigner F, Aytac E, Bislenghi G, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Elfeki H, Gallo G, Grossi U, Gulcu B, Iqbal N, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Leventoglu S, Lisi G, Litta F, Lung P, Millan M, Ozturk E, Sackitey C, Shalaby M, Stijns J, Tozer P, Zimmerman D. European Society of Coloproctology: Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:145-196. [PMID: 38050857 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The primary aim of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Guideline Development Group (GDG) was to produce high-quality, evidence-based guidelines for the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula with input from a multidisciplinary group and using transparent, reproducible methodology. METHODS Previously published methodology in guideline development by the ESCP has been replicated in this project. The guideline development process followed the requirements of the AGREE-S tool kit. Six phases can be identified in the methodology. Phase one sets the scope of the guideline, which addresses the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula in adult patients presenting to secondary care. The target population for this guideline are healthcare practitioners in secondary care and patients interested in understanding the clinical evidence available for various surgical interventions for anal fistula. Phase two involved formulation of the GDG. The GDG consisted of 21 coloproctologists, three research fellows, a radiologist and a methodologist. Stakeholders were chosen for their clinical and academic involvement in the management of anal fistula as well as being representative of the geographical variation among the ESCP membership. Five patients were recruited from patient groups to review the draft guideline. These patients attended two virtual meetings to discuss the evidence and suggest amendments. In phase three, patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes questions were formulated by the GDG. The GDG ratified 250 questions and chose 45 for inclusion in the guideline. In phase four, critical and important outcomes were confirmed for inclusion. Important outcomes were pain and wound healing. Critical outcomes were fistula healing, fistula recurrence and incontinence. These outcomes formed part of the inclusion criteria for the literature search. In phase five, a literature search was performed of MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Embase (Ovid) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews by eight teams of the GDG. Data were extracted and submitted for review by the GDG in a draft guideline. The most recent systematic reviews were prioritized for inclusion. Studies published since the most recent systematic review were included in our analysis by conducting a new meta-analysis using Review manager. In phase six, recommendations were formulated, using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations, in three virtual meetings of the GDG. RESULTS In seven sections covering the diagnostic and therapeutic management of perianal abscess and cryptoglandular anal fistula, there are 42 recommendations. CONCLUSION This is an up-to-date international guideline on the management of cryptoglandular anal fistula using methodology prescribed by the AGREE enterprise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jos Kleijnen
- KSR Ltd & Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) -CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ugo Grossi
- Treviso Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Monica Millan
- La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
An Update on the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Collagen Injectables for Aesthetic and Regenerative Medicine Applications. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15:polym15041020. [PMID: 36850304 PMCID: PMC9963981 DOI: 10.3390/polym15041020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissues diseases significantly affect patients quality of life and usually require targeted, costly and sometimes constant interventions. With the average lifetime increase, a proportional increase of age-related soft tissues diseases has been witnessed. Due to this, the last two decades have seen a tremendous demand for minimally invasive one-step resolutive procedures. Intensive scientific and industrial research has led to the recognition of injectable formulations as a new advantageous approach in the management of complex diseases that are challenging to treat with conventional strategies. Among them, collagen-based products are revealed to be one of the most promising among bioactive biomaterials-based formulations. Collagen is the most abundant structural protein of vertebrate connective tissues and, because of its structural and non-structural role, is one of the most widely used multifunctional biomaterials in the health-related sectors, including medical care and cosmetics. Indeed, collagen-based formulations are historically considered as the "gold standard" and from 1981 have been paving the way for the development of a new generation of fillers. A huge number of collagen-based injectable products have been approved worldwide for clinical use and have routinely been introduced in many clinical settings for both aesthetic and regenerative surgery. In this context, this review article aims to be an update on the clinical outcomes of approved collagen-based injectables for both aesthetic and regenerative medicine of the last 20 years with an in-depth focus on their safety and effectiveness for the treatment of diseases of the integumental, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and urogenital apparatus.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fabiani B, Menconi C, Martellucci J, Giani I, Toniolo G, Naldini G. Permacol™ collagen paste injection for the treatment of complex anal fistula: 1-year follow-up. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:211-215. [PMID: 28210857 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1590-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Accepted: 01/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal surgical treatment for anal fistula should result in healing of the fistula track and preserve anal continence. The aim of this study was to evaluate Permacol™ collagen paste (Covidien plc, Gosport, Hampshire, UK) injection for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, reporting feasibility, safety, outcome and functional results. METHODS Between May 2013 and December 2014, 21 consecutive patients underwent Permacol paste injection for complex anal fistula at our institutions. All patients underwent fistulectomy and seton placement 6-8 weeks before Permacol™ paste injection. Follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS Eighteen patients (85.7%) had a high transsphincteric anal fistula, and three female patients (14.3%) had an anterior transsphincteric fistula. Fistulas were recurrent in three patients (14.3%). Seven patients (33%) had a fistula with multiple tracts. After a follow-up of 12 months, ten patients were considered healed (overall success rate 47.6%). The mean preoperative FISI score was 0.33 ± 0.57 and 0.61 ± 1.02 after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS Permacol™ paste injection was safe and effective in some patients with complex anal fistula without compromising continence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Fabiani
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - C Menconi
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - J Martellucci
- General, Emergency and Minimaly Invasive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - I Giani
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Toniolo
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Naldini
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cadeddu F, Salis F, Lisi G, Ciangola I, Milito G. Complex anal fistula remains a challenge for colorectal surgeon. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30:595-603. [PMID: 25566951 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-2104-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Anal fistula is a common proctological problem to both patient and physician throughout surgical history. Several surgical and sphincter-sparing approaches have been described for the management of fistula-in-ano, aimed to minimize the recurrence and to preserve the continence. We aimed to systematically review the available studies relating to the surgical management of anal fistulas. MATERIAL AND METHODS A Medline search was performed using the PubMed, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting on fistula-in-ano management, aimed to find out the current techniques available, the new technologies, and their effectiveness in order to delineate a gold standard treatment algorithm. RESULTS The management of low anal fistulas is usually straightforward, given that fistulotomy is quite effective, and if the fistula has been properly evaluated, continence disturbance is minimal. On the contrary, high complex fistulas are challenging, because cure and continence are directly competing priorities. CONCLUSIONS Conventional fistula surgery techniques have their place, but new technologies such as fibrin glues, dermal collagen injection, the anal fistula plugs, and stem cell injection offer alternative approaches whose long-term efficacy needs to be further clarified in large long-term randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cadeddu
- Department of Surgery, San Francesco Hospital, Via Mannironi, 08020, Nuoro, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sileri P, Boehm G, Franceschilli L, Giorgi F, Perrone F, Stolfi C, Monteleone G, Gaspari AL. Collagen matrix injection combined with flap repair for complex anal fistula. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14 Suppl 3:24-8. [PMID: 23136821 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Several biomaterials have been proposed to treat anal fistula alone or in combination with other surgical procedures aiming to reduce recurrence rates while minimizing continence impairment. More recently a porcine dermal matrix injection has been proposed as infill biomaterial to treat fistulae. We propose an approach consisting of non-cutting seton positioning followed several weeks later by flap repair associated with dermal matrix injection into the fistula tracts. We report our experience with this two-staged procedure on 24 consecutive patients with complex anal fistulae with a median follow up of > 12 months. In our experience this two-stage approach seems to be safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sileri
- Department of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Porcine dermal collagen matrix injection may enhance flap repair surgery for complex anal fistula. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011; 26:345-9. [PMID: 20953873 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1066-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2010] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of biomaterials to treat anal fistula has drawn great interest. More recently, a porcine dermal matrix injection has been proposed as infill biomaterial to treat fistulas. METHODS We propose a novel approach consisting in non-cutting seton positioning followed by flap repair associated with dermal matrix injection into the fistula tracts after several weeks. RESULTS We report our experience with this two-staged procedure on 11 consecutive patients with recurrent high trans-sphincteric fistulas with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, this two-stage approach seems to be safe and effective.
Collapse
|