Dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy

Robot-assisted hemihepatectomy is superior to laparoscopic hemihepatectomy through dorsal approach: A propensity score-matched study (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Dorsal approach is the potentially effective strategy for minimally invasive liver resection. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic hemihepatectomy through dorsal approach.

METHODS

We compared the patients who underwent robot-assisted hemihepatectomy (Rob-HH) and who had laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (Lap-HH) through dorsal approach between January 2020 and December 2022. A 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to minimize bias and confounding factors.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were included, 41 with Rob-HH and 55 with Lap-HH. Among them, 58 underwent left hemihepatectomy (LHH) and 38 underwent right hemihepatectomy (RHH). Compared with Lap-HH group, patients with Rob-HH had less estimated blood loss (median: 100.0 vs. 300.0 mL, P = 0.016), lower blood transfusion rates (4.9% vs. 29.1%, P= 0.003) and postoperative complication rates (26.8% vs. 54.5%, P = 0.016). These significant differences consistently existed after PSM and in the LHH subgroups. Furthermore, robot-assisted LHH was associated with decreased Pringle duration (45 vs. 60 min, P = 0.047). RHH subgroup analysis showed that compared with Lap-RHH, Rob-RHH was associated with less estimated blood loss (200.0 vs. 400.0 mL, P = 0.013). No significant differences were found in other perioperative outcomes among pre- and post-PSM cohorts, such as Pringle duration, operative time, and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

The dorsal approach was a safe and feasible strategy for hemi-hepatectomy with favorable outcomes under robot-assisted system in reducing intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and postoperative complications.

The dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (with video)

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic hemihepatectomy has gained prominence, one of the critical challenges in this procedure is the approach to the middle hepatic vein (MHV). The MHV, which runs in the midplane of the liver, is situated above the hilar plate and serves as an anatomical landmark in hemihepatectomy. We have introduced dorsal approach to the MHV from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy under the laparoscopic caudo-dorsal view.

METHODS

The liver parenchyma was divided along the midplane, which was identified as a surface ischemic line caused by selective inflow control of the right or left hemiliver. The MHV is dissected from the main root from the hilar plate toward the peripheral branches. The liver parenchyma was divided from the dorsal toward the ventral side, and the transection plane was tailored according to the particular type of hemihepatectomy.

RESULTS

This approach was utilized in 28 patients with 9 undergoing right hepatectomy and 19 undergoing left hepatectomy. The median duration of the surgery was 260 min (range, 140-360 min), whereas median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (range, 40-400 mL). One patient (3.6%) has experienced postoperative major complications. The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 7 days (range, 5-20 days).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the dorsal approach to the MHV from the hilar plate in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy represents a significant advancement in the surgical technique. This approach offers enhanced visualization and precise dissection, which are critical for minimizing complications and improving surgical outcomes.

How to Find Correct Transection Plane in Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy Extended to S1 for Bismuth IIIa Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is one of the most challenging tumours for hepatic surgeons. To reach radical resection, it is mandatory to extend the hepatectomy to segment 1 and biliary tract. With the advent of minimally invasive techniques, an increasing number of centres have begun to treat this tumour using robotic or laparoscopic approaches, demonstrating the ability to maintain oncological standards as well as morbidity and mortality criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This video presents a case of a 79-year-old man with pCCA Bismuth type IIIa, undergoing right hepatectomy extended to segment 1 and biliary tract after preoperative optimization including biliary drainage and portal vein and right hepatic vein embolization. Unlike conventional right hepatectomy, extending transection to include segment 1 requires identifying the plane defined by the Arantius duct.

RESULTS

To reach this plane, we suggest using three approaches, previously described in other hepatectomies, were employed: dorsal and caudal approaches to the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and an extraglissonian intrahepatic approach to the left portal pedicle.

CONCLUSION

With this method, we achieved oncologically radical resection of pCCA using minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Minimally Invasive Left Hepatectomy: Choosing the Suitable Surgical Strategy

BACKGROUND

Numerous surgical techniques are currently available for minimally invasive left hepatic resection, each offering its own advantages and disadvantages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multimedia manuscript delves into the primary approaches for minimally invasive left hepatectomy, with a focus on particular topics such as left hepatic vein approach, transection and middle hepatic vein exposure, and Glissonean approach. We examine key factors that surgeons should consider when choosing among these methods and provide practical recommendations.

RESULTS

To enhance understanding, our article includes video footage from multiple centres, showcasing expertly executed surgeries for each approach along with their main considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

This multimedia resource will serve as a valuable guide for surgeons, aiding in the selection of the most suitable strategy for minimally invasive left hepatectomies, tailored to the specific needs of the patient and the characteristics of the lesion.

Evaluation of ventral branches of segment VI portal vein relative to the right hepatic vein in laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy

INTRODUCTION

The right intersectional plane and the right hepatic hilum were noted too often exhibit anatomical variations, making difficult the laparoscopic right anterior sectionectomy (LRAS).

METHODS

We analyzed the anatomical features employing 3D-CT images of 55 patients, and evaluated these features according to the course of ventral branches of segment VI of the portal vein (PV, P6a) relative to the right hepatic vein (RHV).

RESULTS

P6a run on the dorsal side of RHV in 32 patients (58%, Dorsal-P6a) and the ventral side of RHV in 23 (42%, Ventral-P6a). Ventral-P6a had more patients with S6 partially drained by middle hepatic vein (MHV, 39% vs. 0%, P < 0001), the narrower angle between the anterior and posterior branches of PV (73.1° vs. 93.8°, P = 0.006), the wider angle between the RHV and inferior vena cava  (54.3° vs. 44.3°, P < 0.001), and more steeply pitched angle between S6 and S7 along the RHV (140.6° vs. 162.0°, P < 0.001) compared to Dorsal-P6a.

CONCLUSION

In LRAS for Dorsal-P6a patients, the transection surface was relatively flat. In LRAS for Ventral-P6a patients, the narrow space between anterior and posterior glissons makes difficult the glissonean approach. The transection plane was steeply pitched, and RHV was partially exposed. S6 was often partially drained to MHV in 39% of the Ventral-P6a patients, which triggers congestion during liver transection of a right intersectional plane after first splitting the confluence of this branch.

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy guided by indocyanine green fluorescence: A cranial-dorsal approach

BACKGROUND

Advancements in laparoscopic technology and a deeper understanding of intrahepatic anatomy have led to the establishment of more precise laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) techniques. The indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence navigation technique has emerged as the most effective method for identifying hepatic regions, potentially overcoming the limitations of LH. While laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) is a standardized procedure, there is a need for innovative strategies to enhance its outcomes.

AIM

To investigate a standardized cranial-dorsal strategy for LLH, focusing on important anatomical markers, surgical skills, and ICG staining methods.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients who underwent ICG fluorescence-guided LLH at Qujing Second People's Hospital between January 2019 and February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The cranial-dorsal approach was performed which involves dissecting the left hepatic vein cephalad, isolating the Arantius ligament , exposing the middle hepatic vein, and dissecting the parenchyma from the dorsal to the foot in order to complete the anatomical LLH. The surgical methods, as well as intra- and post-surgical data, were recorded and analyzed. Our hospital's Medical Ethics Committee approved this study (Ethical review: 2022-019-01).

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss during LLH was 335.68 ± 99.869 mL and the rates of transfusion and conversion to laparotomy were 13.5% and 0%, respectively. The overall incidence of complications throughout the follow-up (median of 18 months; range 1-36 months) was 21.6%. No mortality or severe complications (level IV) were reported.

CONCLUSION

LLH has the potential to become a novel, standardized approach that can effectively, safely, and simply expose the middle hepatic vein and meet the requirements of precision surgery.

The proximity of the middle hepatic vein to the hepatic hilus: a retrospective radiological study

PURPOSE

The middle hepatic vein (MHV) is an important landmark in anatomical hemihepatectomy. The proximity between the MHV and the hilar plate was suspected to be associated with tumor exposure during left hemihepatectomy for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and is reported to facilitate a dorsal approach to the MHV during laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. However, the precise distance between these locations is unknown.

METHODS

To investigate the "accurate and normal" distance between the MHV and the hilar plate, the present study focused on patients who presented without perihilar tumor. One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were included. Retrospective radiological measurement was performed using preoperative multi-detector row CT. The optimized CT slices perpendicular to the MHV were made using the multiplanar reconstruction technique. The shortest distance between the MHV and the hilar plate was measured on the left and right sides on the perpendicular slices. The diameters of the left and right hepatic ducts were also measured.

RESULTS

The distance was 9.0 mm (1.9-20.0 mm) on the left side and 11.3 mm (2.3-21.8) on the right side (p < 0.001). The distance on the left side was < 10 mm in 60% of patients (n = 100). Only one-third of patients (n = 55) had a distance of ≥ 10 mm on both sides. As the hepatic ducts became more dilated, the distance from the MHV to the hilar plate became shorter.

CONCLUSION

The MHV was located in close proximity to the hepatic hilus, especially on the left side.

Caudodorsal approach combined with in situ split for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) was technically challenging and lack of standardization. There were some approaches for LRPS, such as caudal approach and dorsal approach. During our practice, we initiated pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split and present several advantages of this method.

METHODS

From April 2018 to December 2021, consecutive patients who underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split at our institution entered into this retrospective study. The key point of the caudodorsal approach was that the right hepatic vein was exposed from peripheral branches toward the root and the parenchyma was transected from the dorsal side to ventral side. Specially, the right perihepatic ligaments were not divided to keep the right liver in situ before parenchymal dissection for each case.

RESULTS

11 patients underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split. There were 9 hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 hepatic hemangioma. Five patients had mild cirrhosis and 1 had moderate cirrhosis. All the procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. The median operative time was 375 min (range of 290-505 min) and the median blood loss was 300 ml (range of 100-1000 ml). Five patients received perioperative blood transfusion, of which 1 patient received autologous blood transfusion and 2 patients received blood transfusion due to preoperative moderate anemia. No procedure was converted to open surgery. Two patients who suffered from postoperative complications, improved after conservative treatments. The median postoperative stay was 11 days (range of 7-25 days). No postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, and mortality occurred.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary clinical effect of the caudodorsal approach with in situ split for LRPS was satisfactory. Our method was feasible and expected to provide ideas for the standardization of LRPS. Further researches are required due to some limitations of this study.

Trocar layouts in laparoscopic liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Since the first laparoscopic wedge resection reported by Reich, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been progressively developed, acquiring safety and feasibility. The time has witnessed a milestone leap for laparoscopic hepatectomy from pure laparoscopic partial hepatectomy to anatomical hepatectomy and from minor liver resection to major liver resection. The numerous previous studies have paid more attention to the short-time and long-time surgical outcomes caused by surgical techniques corresponding to various segments and approaches. However, focus on trocar layouts remains poorly described, but it plays an indispensable role in surgical process.

METHODS

We have searched PubMed for English language articles with the key words "trocar," "laparoscopic liver resection," and "liver resection approaches."

RESULTS

This review highlighted each type of trocar layouts corresponding to specific circumstances, including targeted resection segments with various approaches. Notably, surgeon preferences and patients body habitus affect the trocar layouts to some extent as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were fewer researches focus on trocar layouts, they determine the operation field and manipulation space and be likely to have an impact on outcomes of surgery. Therefore, further studies are warranted to firm the role of trocar layouts in LLR.

Dorsal vs ventral approach to the middle hepatic vein during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: multicenter retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Left hemihepatectomy requires exposure of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) at the cutting-surface. Two procedures are used to approach the MHV: a conventional ventral approach and a laparoscopy-specific dorsal approach. This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of these two procedures.

METHODS

Clinical records of 38 consecutive patients that underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy in four university hospitals between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measurements were operative blood loss, operating time, trend of postoperative laboratory data within 7 days after hepatectomy, and postoperative complications. Quality of MHV exposure was also evaluated and compared by three-grade evaluation (excellent/good/poor) using recorded still images of the cut-surface of the remnant liver (n = 35).

RESULTS

Dorsal and ventral approaches were performed in 9 and 29 patients, respectively. Median operating time was 316 min (dorsal) and 314 min (ventral) (P = 0.71). Median operative blood loss was 45 ml (dorsal) and 105 ml (ventral) (P = 0.10). Two patients in the ventral approach group had bleeding in excess of 500 ml, which was not seen in the dorsal approach group. Excellent/good/poor MHV appearance on the cutting-surface was observed in 5/3/1 patients in the dorsal approach group, respectively, and in 7/8/11 patients in the ventral approach group, respectively (P = 0.03). In the ventral approach group, significant increases of aspartate aminotransferase (on postoperative day 1 and day 4/5) and of alanine aminotransferase (on postoperative day 2/3 and 4/5) were observed (P < 0.05). Postoperative complications were observed only in the ventral approach group (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The dorsal approach could achieve safe and precise anatomical left hemihepatectomy with operation time and operative blood loss comparable to the conventional ventral approach.

Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Using the Hilar Plate-First Approach (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Effective inflow and outflow control of the liver is essential for a safe hepatectomy. Detachment of the hilar plate is a fundamental technique in the Glissonean approach. The hilar plate is situated near the middle hepatic vein, which runs in the midplane of the liver, and serves as a landmark during hemihepatectomy. In this study, we describe the technical details and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using the hilar plate-first approach.

METHODS

The key procedures of the hilar plate-first approach included the following: (1) detachment of the hilar plate for the left Glissonean approach, (2) the middle hepatic vein approach from the hilar plate, (3) parenchymal transection along the ischemic line and middle hepatic vein, and (4) transection of the left Glissonean pedicle at the ventral aspect of the Arantius ligament.

RESULTS

Between September 2020 and September 2021, 12 patients underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy using the hilar plate-first approach. The median operation time was 227 min (range 140-350 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 82.5 ml (range 50-150 ml). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-10 days). No major complications, including biliary complications, were observed.

CONCLUSION

The hilar plate-first approach contributes to the standardization of surgical techniques for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy. This technique is a safe and effective approach for the inflow and outflow systems of the left hemiliver.

Anatomy of the Middle Hepatic Vein Tributaries to Promote Safer Hepatic Vein-Guided Liver Resection

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic anatomic liver resection, an increasingly common procedure, the hepatic vein-guided approach is widely used although the hepatic vein tributaries can be a major source of bleeding in the event of inadvertent injury. This report describes the anatomy of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) including its tributaries based on reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images and provides anatomic data to enable safe middle hepatic vein-guided liver resection.

METHODS

Following simulation modeling of the hepatic vasculatures, reconstructed MHV data was pooled from 35 healthy liver donors. Yields of the MHV tributaries were analyzed to enable MHV-guided liver resection.

RESULTS

A total of 252 tributaries were identified in the 35 donors. The MHV yielded fewer tributaries from its anterior and posterior aspects than from its right-side and left-side aspects (40 [15.9%], 13 [5.2%], 93 [36.9%], and 106 [42.1%], respectively). The MHV tributaries from the anterior and posterior aspects were smaller in diameter than those from the right-side and left-side aspects (median, 3.0, 2.0, 4.8, and 4.0 mm, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Our simulation revealed that MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect poses a lower risk of injury to the MHV tributaries compared to dissection from either lateral aspect. In addition, MHV dissection from the anterior or posterior aspect allows for safer identification and isolation of the thick MHV tributaries originating from the lateral aspects. Ideally, the anterior or posterior aspect of the MHV should be accessed and exposed before the lateral aspects are dissected to minimize the risk of MHV tributary injury.

Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection

BACKGROUND

The concept of minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is gaining popularity. However, specific technical skills need to be acquired to safely perform MIALR. The "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was developed as a special program during the 32nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS).

METHODS

Thirty-four international experts gathered online for the consensus. A Research Committee performed a comprehensive literature review, classifying studies according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Based on the literature review and experts' opinions, tentative recommendations were drafted and circulated among experts using online Delphi Rounds. Finally, formulated recommendations were presented online in the Expert Consensus Meeting of the JSHBPS on February 23rd, 2021. The final recommendations were validated and finalized by the 2nd Delphi Round in May 2021.

RESULTS

Seven clinical questions were selected, and 22 recommendations were formulated. All recommendations reached more than 85% consensus among experts at the final Delphi Round.

CONCLUSIONS

The Expert Consensus Meeting for safely performing MIALR has presented a set of clinical guidelines based on available literature and experts' opinions. We expect these guidelines to have a favorable effect on the safe implementation and development of MIALR.

Landmarks and techniques to perform minimally invasive liver surgery: A systematic review with a focus on hepatic outflow

PURPOSE

In this systematic review, we aimed to clarify the useful anatomic structures and assess available surgical techniques and strategies required to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR), with a particular focus on the hepatic veins (HVs).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed for English articles and Ichushi databases for Japanese articles through September 2020. The quality assessment of the articles was performed in accordance with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN).

RESULTS

A total of 3372 studies were obtained, and 59 were selected and reviewed. Due to the limited number of published comparative studies and case series, the degree of evidence from our review was low. Thirty-two articles examined the anatomic landmarks and crucial structures for approaching HVs. Regarding the direction of HV exposure, 32 articles focused on the techniques and advantages of exposing HVs from either the root or the periphery. Ten articles focused on the techniques to perform a segmentectomy 8 in particularly difficult cases of MIALR. In seven articles, bleeding control from HVs was also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review may help experts reach a consensus regarding the best approach to the management of hepatic veins during MIALR.

Dorsal approach with Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right anatomic liver resections

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (LAH) has gradually become a routine surgical procedure. However, how to expose the whole hepatic vein and avoid the hepatic vein laceration is still a challenge because of the caudate lobe, particularly in right hepatectomy. We adopted a dorsal approach combined with Glissionian appraoch to perform laparoscopic right anatomic hepatectomy (LRAH).

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent LRAH from January 2017 to November 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, seven patients underwent laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (LRH group), seven patients who underwent laparoscopic right posterior hepatectomy (LRPH group), and six patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy for segment 7 (LS7 group). The paracaval portion of caudate lobe could be transected firstly through dorsal approach and the corresponding major hepatic vein could be exposed from its root to the peripheral branches safely. Due to exposure along the major hepatic vein trunk, the remaining liver parenchyma could be quickly transected from dorsal to cranial side.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 53.8 years and the male: female ratio was 8:12. The median operation time was 306.0 ± 58.2 min and the mean estimated volume of blood loss was 412.5 ± 255.4 mL. The mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 10.2 days. The mean Pringle maneuver time was 64.8 ± 27.7 min. Five patients received transfusion of 2-4 U of red blood cells. Two patients suffered from transient hepatic dysfunction and one suffered from pleural effusion. None of the patients underwent conversion to an open procedure. The operative duration, volume of the blood loss, Pringle maneuver time, and postoperative hospital stay duration did not differ significantly among the LRH, LRPH, and LS7 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal approach combined with Glissonian approach for right lobe is feasible and effective in laparoscopic right anatomic liver resections.

Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Tumors Close to the Major Hepatic Veins: Intraparenchymal Identification of the Major Hepatic Veins using the Ventral Approach

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major hepatic veins (HVs) is a technically demanding procedure that is relatively contraindicated. We investigated this surgical technique and the outcomes of intraparenchymal identification of the major HVs using the ventral approach in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major HVs.

METHODS

In the present study, tumors < 10 mm from the major HVs were defined as lesions in proximity to the major HVs. The cranio-ventral part of the liver parenchyma along the targeted major hepatic veins was opened to facilitate an open cutting plane. After a wide exposure of the surgical plane, the targeted major HVs were identified.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with tumors close to the major HVs underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. The median operative time was 260 min (range, 160-410 min), while the intraoperative blood loss was 100 mL (range, 30-310 mL). The median Pringle maneuver time was 45 min (range, 40-75 min). The median tumor size was 50 mm (range, 17-140 mm), and the median tumor margin was 4 mm (range, 0-10 mm). Three patients (23.1%) experienced minor postoperative complications. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range, 4-25 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for tumors close to the major HVs is technically feasible in selected patients. Intraparenchymal identification of the major HVs using the ventral approach achieves transection plane accuracy and avoids inadvertent injury to the major HVs.

Laparoscopic middle-hepatic-vein-guided anatomical hemihepatectomy in the treatment of hepatolithiasis: a 10-year case study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective 10-year case study evaluated the perioperative results and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic middle-hepatic-vein-guided hemihepatectomy (L-MHV-H) and traditional anatomical hemihepatectomy (TAH) in the treatment of hepatolithiasis (HL).

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2019, 99 patients with regional HL underwent laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy (LAH) at our centre, including 43 patients in the L-MHV-H group and 56 patients in the TAH group.

RESULTS

All patients in both groups were Child-Pugh grade A before operation. No significant between-group differences in general information, stone distribution, comorbidities, history of previous abdominal surgery or co-occurrence of gallstones and common bile duct stones were observed. The L-MHV-H group exhibited a higher intraoperative stone clearance rate (95.3% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.014) and a lower postoperative complication rate (10.1% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.005) compared with the TAH group. In the median follow-up time of 60 months (range 6-125 months), the L-MHV-H group had lower stone recurrence (2.3% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.013) and cholangitis recurrence (2.3% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.034) rates. No significant between-group differences in the other results were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

L-MHV-H is safe and feasible for HL with certain advantages over TAH in improving the intraoperative stone clearance rate, reducing postoperative complication incidence and reducing stone and cholangitis recurrence rates.

Laparoscopic-specific procedure using dorsal approach to the middle hepatic vein in laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Exposing the middle hepatic vein (MHV) is required in left hemihepatectomy [1]. Laparoscopy enables us to perform unique approach in performing hepatectomy [2,3]. Herein we show a video of dorsal approach in left hemihepatectomy and measure anatomical parameters useful for approaching to the MHV.

PATIENT

A 79-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis underwent laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

TECHNIQUE

After mobilizing left lateral section and encircling left Glissonian trunk, we firstly flipped up left lateral section inside and began parenchymal transection from dorsal surface around the root of left hepatic vein (LHV). Immediately we touched the MHV and, by cutting the left Glissonian trunk, could extend complete MHV exposure in central-to-peripheral direction without split injuries of MHV branches [2]. Next, we flipped down the left lateral section and divided ventral remaining parenchyma in caudal-to-cranial direction without risk of MHV injury. As this is not one-way procedure [4], as if open a book, we adjusted the ventral cutting plane to match with the dorsal one. Finally, by cutting the LHV, we completed left hemihepatectomy.

MEASURING ANATOMICAL PARAMETERS

We divided a sectional image into four zones (cranio-dorsal, caudal-dorsal, caudal-ventral, and cranio-ventral zones) and measured each anatomical parameter to expose the MHV. The area of cranio-dorsal zone was smallest to expose the MHV (3.5cm²). The distance from the Arantius' ligament to the MHV was also shortest (1.1cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal approach might be the nearest and safe road way to the MHV. This approach might make it easy to complete laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.

Pure laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy using the caudate lobe-first approach

BACKGROUND

In our process of standardizing laparoscopic right-sided anatomical hepatectomy, we found several advantages of the caudate lobe-first approach. We herein describe our standardized procedure of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (Lap-RPS) using this approach.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and January 2018, 31 patients underwent pure Lap-RPS in our hospital. The mean patient age was 68 years (range 47-85 years), and the number of male patients was more than that of female patients (64.5%). Of 31 patients, 20 had metastatic liver tumor, 7 had hepatocellular carcinoma, 3 had intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, and 1 had hemangioma. All 31 patients had Child-Pugh class A liver function. The surgical technique was recorded on video. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses were applied to assess the learning curve.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 420 min (range 263-639 min), and the mean amount of blood loss was 304 g (range 10-900 g). No procedure was converted to open surgery. Postoperative bleeding, bile leakage, hepatic failure, and mortality did not occur. CUSUM analyses showed a decrease in the operative time and blood loss after using the caudate lobe-first approach.

CONCLUSION

Our standardized procedure of Lap-RPS using the caudate lobe-first approach is not only feasible but also expected to provide an advantage for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy.

Short- and long-term outcomes of middle hepatic vein-oriented hepatectomy for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of the middle hepatic vein (MHV)-oriented versus conventional hemihepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC).

METHODS

From 2008 to 2017, medical records of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy for advanced PHC were reviewed retrospectively. MHV-oriented hepatectomy was defined as full exposure of the MHV on the dissection plane. Predictors of morbidity and survival were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were enrolled. MHV-oriented and conventional hepatectomies were performed in 44 and 81 patients, respectively. The curative resection rate, blood loss, transfusion, and survival were comparable between two groups; however, severe morbidity rate was significantly lower in the MHV-oriented group (9.1% vs 38.3%, P < 0.001). MHV-oriented approach was an independent predictor of severe morbidity, as were the age, bilirubin level, and blood transfusion. Severe morbidity was associated with significantly decreased overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 29.0 vs 46.9 months, P = 0.011 and 20.3 vs 31.1 months, P = 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that severe morbidity independently predicted shorter RFS (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

MHV-oriented approach for advanced PHC is safe and associated with a significant decrease in severe morbidity. Severe morbidity adversely affects survival after surgery; therefore, optimal preoperative preparation and MHV-oriented hepatectomy with meticulous dissection remain of critical importance.

Usefulness of the Ligamentum Venosum as an Anatomical Landmark for Safe Laparoscopic Left Hepatectomy (How I Do It)

Anatomical landmarks are commonly utilized in surgical practice to help surgeons to maintain an anatomical orientation. The ligamentum venosum (LV) is an anatomical landmark that is utilized during left hepatectomy via both the open and the laparoscopic approaches. We describe the usefulness of the LV as an anatomical landmark in performing a safe laparoscopic left hepatectomy. The key characteristic of our technique is that the LV is divided at the end of the surgery. Our technique involves identification and dissection of the LV, but we do not divide it during liver mobilization. The LV marks the boundary for safe vascular inflow control of the left hemiliver. Following exposure of the middle hepatic vein, hepatic parenchymal transection is curved toward the LV, which serves as a landmark to guide surgeons to achieve an optimal plane of transection in the late stages. A suitable transection point of the left bile duct is determined based on the location of the LV. Between February 2013 and September 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent pure laparoscopic left hepatectomy. The median operation time was 240 min (range 180-350 min), and the median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 200 ml (range 80-600 ml). Major postoperative complications occurred in one patient (4.8%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-15 days). This systematic approach using the LV as an anatomical landmark may serve as a safe and effective technique to perform a laparoscopic left hepatectomy.

Glissonian approach combined with major hepatic vein first for laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy remains challenging because of the complex interior structures of the liver. Our novel strategy includes the Glissonian approach and the major hepatic vein first, which serves to define the external and internal landmarks for laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy.

METHODS

Eleven cases underwent laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy, including three right hepatectomies, three left hepatectomies, three right posterior hepatectomies, and two mesohepatectomies. The Glissonian approach was used to transect the hepatic pedicles as external demarcation. The major hepatic vein near the hepatic portal was exposed and served as the internal landmark for parenchymal transection. The liver parenchyma below and above the major hepatic vein was transected along the major hepatic vein. Fifty-nine subjects were used to compare the distance between the major hepatic vein and secondary Glisson pedicles among different liver diseases.

RESULTS

The average operative time was 327 min with an estimated blood loss of 554.55 mL. Only two patients received three units of packed red blood cells. The others recovered normally and were discharged on postoperative day 7. The distance between right posterior Glissonian pedicle and right hepatic vein was shorter in the patients with cirrhosis than that without cirrhosis, and this distance was even shorter in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

The Glissonian approach with the major hepatic vein first is easy and feasible for laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy, especially in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis.

Pure laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy using the caudodorsal side approach (with videos)

BACKGROUND

In our process of standardizing laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (Lap-RH), we found several advantages of the laparoscopic caudate lobe first approach by using a unique laparoscopic caudodorsal view.

METHODS

Between April 2012 and October 2017, 21 patients underwent pure Lap-RH at our hospital. The mean patient age was 62 years (range 36-75 years), and there were more male than female patients (66.7%). Of 21 patients, 11 had hepatocellular carcinoma, eight had metastatic tumor, and the other two had focal nodular hyperplasia and refractory liver abscess. All 21 patients had Child-Pugh class A liver function. The surgical technique was recorded on video.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 409 min (range 241-522 min), and the mean blood loss was 279 g (range 0-1,010 g). No procedure was converted to open surgery. With regard to postoperative complications, one patient had bile leakage from the stump of the main Glissonean branch and another patient had abscess formation in the subphrenic space. No postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, and mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our standardized procedure of Lap-RH using the unique laparoscopic caudodorsal view is not only feasible but also confers a true advantage of the laparoscopic approach.

Useful maneuvers for precise laparoscopic liver resection

Laparoscopic liver resection has evolved over the past decade and nearly replaced open exploration. This procedure not only provides comparable oncological outcomes, but it also has improved recovery after surgery. Many of the challenges presented by limitations of instruments and techniques have been overcome through adaptations and new developments, and it is possible that the remaining obstacles will be overcome within a few years. Moreover, as surgeons continue to gain experience, their technical knowledge has supported further improvement in minimally invasive approaches. This review examines every important procedures in performing a precise laparoscopic liver resection.

Fully laparoscopic left hepatectomy - a technical reference proposed for standard practice compared to the open approach: a retrospective propensity score model

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy (LLH) may be an alternative to open (OLH). There are several original variations in the technical aspects of LLH, and no accepted standard. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the technique developed at Henri Mondor Hospital since 1996.

METHODS

The technique of LLH was conceived for safety and training of two mature generations of lead surgeons. The technique includes full laparoscopy, ventral approach to the common trunk, extrahepatic pedicle dissection, CUSA^® parenchymal transection, division of the left hilar plate laterally to the Arantius ligament, and ventral transection of the left hepatic vein. The outcomes of LLH and OLH were compared. Perioperative analysis included intra- and postoperative, and histology variables. Propensity Score Matching was undertaken of background covariates including age, ASA, BMI, fibrosis, steatosis, tumour size, and specimen weight.

RESULTS

17 LLH and 51 OLH were performed from 1996 to 2014 with perioperative mortality rates of 0% and 6%, respectively. In the LLH group, two patients underwent conversion to open surgery. Propensity matching selected 10 LLH/OLH pairs. The LLH group had a higher proportion of procedures for benign disease. LLH was associated with longer operating time and less blood loss. Perioperative complications occurred in 30% (LLH) and 10% (OLH) (p = 1). Mortality and ITU stay were similar.

CONCLUSION

This technique is recommended as a possible technical reference for standard LLH.

Perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma introduced gradually in a single center

BACKGROUND

Anatomical hepatectomy is an ideal curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We have standardized our laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy (LAH) procedure, gradually extending its indications. In the present study, we describe our experience and the perioperative and oncological outcomes of LAH for HCC compared to those of open anatomical hepatectomy (OAH) during the gradual introduction of LAH.

METHODS

Seventy patients with primary HCC underwent anatomical hepatectomy in our institution from November 2008 to April 2014. As we gained experience with LAH, our indications for choosing LAH over OAH gradually expanded. Ultimately, 40 and 30 patients underwent LAH and OAH, respectively. Perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, background of liver disease, liver function, tumor size, tumor number, or type of liver resection between the two groups. Major complications and mortality rates were similar between the LAH and OAH groups (12.5% vs. 20%; p = 0.582, and 0% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.429, respectively). The median follow-up time after surgery was 40.5 months in the LAH group and 32.9 months in the OAH group (p = 0.835). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 89.9, 84.7, and 70.9%, in the LAH group, and 89.8, 68.0, and 63.1% in the OAH group, respectively (p = 0.255). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 79.5, 58.0, and 42.5%, in the LAH group, and 72.4, 56.1, and 50.4% in the OAH group, respectively (p = 0.980).

CONCLUSIONS

Through gradual introduction of LAH, we obtained comparable results to those achieved with OAH. LAH can be a feasible surgical treatment for primary HCC, with good oncological outcomes.

Evolution of laparoscopic surgery in a high volume hepatobiliary unit: 150 consecutive pure laparoscopic hepatectomies

INTRODUCTION

Compared to other surgical areas, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has not been widely implemented and currently less than 20% of hepatectomies are performed laparoscopically worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility, and the ratio of implementation of LLR in our department.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of 749 liver resections performed during the last 10-year period in a single centre.

RESULTS

A total of 150 (20%) consecutive pure LLR were performed between 2005 and 2015. In 87% of patients the indication was the presence ofprimary or metastatic liver malignancy. We performed 30 major hepatectomies (20%) and (80%) were minor resections, performed in all liver segments. Twelve patients were operated twice and 2 patients underwent a third LLR. The proportion of LLR increased from 12% in 2011 to 62% in the last year. Conversion rate was 9%. Overall morbidity rate was 36% but only one third were classified as severe. The 90-day mortality rate was 1%. Median hospital stay was 4 days and the rate of readmissions was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of LLR has been fast with morbidity and mortality comparable to other published series. In the last 2 years more than half of the hepatectomies are performed laparoscopically in our centre.

An Experimental Study on the Relationship Among Airway Pressure, Pneumoperitoneum Pressure, and Central Venous Pressure in Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine optimal settings for airway pressure (AWP), pneumoperitoneum pressure (PPP), and central venous pressure (CVP) in pure laparoscopic hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND

High PPP is often employed to control bleeding from the hepatic vein during pure laparoscopic hepatectomy; however, there is a risk of pulmonary gas embolism. We noted that decreases in AWP were often effective.

METHODS

After establishing carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in 6 male piglets and maintaining PPP at 25 mmHg, CVP was measured 3 times at each of 9 levels of airway pressure, which was increased in increments of 5 cmH2O from 0 to 40 cmH2O. CVP was measured in the same manner by maintaining PPP at 20, 15, 10, 5, and 0 mmHg, and in laparotomy. Correlation and regression analyses were performed among airway pressure, CVP, and pneumoperitoneum pressure.

RESULTS

Positive correlations were observed between AWP and CVP and between PPP and CVP (P < 0.001). Under high airway pressure, CVP was persistently higher than pneumoperitoneum pressure. Under low airway pressure, CVP did not increase or often decreased when PPP was higher than CVP.

CONCLUSIONS

By increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure, bleeding from the hepatic vein cannot be controlled under high airway pressure, but can be controlled under low airway pressure. However, under low airway pressure, the risk of pulmonary gas embolism increases when PPP is higher than CVP. We consider that reducing AWP is also effective for controlling bleeding from the hepatic vein and safer than increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure.

Totally laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy exposing the major hepatic veins from the root side: a case of the right anterior sectorectomy (with video)

Laparoscopic hepatectomy has rapidly evolved recently; however, laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy has yet to become widely used, although anatomical hepatectomy is ideal, especially for curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, and is widely accepted via open approach. This is because good-experienced skills, for example, exposing Glissonean pedicles and hepatic veins on the cutting plane, are required in order to perform anatomical hepatectomy via a pure laparoscopic approach. We obtained good results for various totally laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomies using the standardized techniques. We exposed the major hepatic veins from the root side by utilizing the unique view from the caudal side in the laparoscopic approach, and moved CUSA from the root side toward the peripheral side to avoid splitting the bifurcation of the hepatic vein. We performed totally laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for 47 patients from August, 2008, to December, 2012 (Table 1). In most types of anatomical hepatectomy, the mean blood loss was <500 ml. Conversion to open surgery was required in two patients. Postoperative complications were prolonged ascites in two, peroneal palsy in two, and biloma in one. Mortality was zero. The embedded video demonstrates totally laparoscopic right anterior sectorectomy. In conclusion, our standardized techniques make laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy more feasible.