1
|
Jain AJ, Lendoire M, Haddad A, Tzeng CWD, Boyev A, Maki H, Chun YS, Arvide EM, Lee S, Hu I, Pant S, Javle M, Tran Cao HS, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Improved Outcomes Following Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A 27-Year Experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:4352-4362. [PMID: 40000564 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-025-17075-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to evaluate surgical outcomes following resection of pCCA over time. METHODS Patients who underwent curative-intent resection with hepatectomy for pCCA at a single institution were divided into two cohorts based on date of resection: past cohort (1996-2013), and recent cohort (2014-2023). RESULTS The study included 100 patients: 55 (55%) in the past (1996-2013) and 45 (45%) in the recent (2014-2023) cohorts. There were no differences between cohorts in age, sex, or Bismuth-Corlette classification between the two cohorts. Preoperative cholangitis was less common in the recent cohort (31% vs. 53%, p = 0.03). The proportions of right and left hepatectomies were similar in both cohorts. However, for patients with Bismuth-Corlette types I, II, and IV tumors (n = 35), left hepatectomy was more frequently performed in the recent cohort (61% vs. 13%, p = 0.005). There were trends toward lower rates of major complications (38% vs. 55%, p = 0.095) in the recent cohort. There was significantly less perioperative mortality (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.039) and no postoperative hepatic insufficiency in the recent cohort (0% vs. 20%, p = 0.001). Median recurrence-free survival was similar in the past and recent cohorts (29 vs. 37 months, respectively; p = 0.560), but median overall survival was improved in the recent cohort (33 months vs. not reached, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative management to reduce preoperative cholangitis and liver insufficiency, advances in surgical technique, and consideration of left-sided hepatic resection have resulted in significantly improved outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for pCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anish J Jain
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun Shin Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elsa M Arvide
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ian Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okuno M, Iwata K, Iwashita T, Mukai T, Shimojo K, Ohashi Y, Iwasa Y, Senju A, Iwata S, Tezuka R, Ichikawa H, Mita N, Uemura S, Yoshida K, Maruta A, Tomita E, Yasuda I, Shimizu M. Comparison of the preoperative transpapillary unilateral biliary drainage methods for the future remnant liver in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma with liver resection: a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 29:102039. [PMID: 40154835 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2025.102039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2025] [Revised: 03/13/2025] [Accepted: 03/22/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transpapillary preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) only for the future remnant liver (FRL) in hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) can be performed minimally invasively, with the expectation of swelling of the FRL. However, verification of the appropriate transpapillary unilateral PBD method for FRL is limited as the cases of liver resection are insufficient. METHODS A total of 63 patients with resectable HCCA were evaluated. Of note, 12 unilateral across-the-papilla plastic stent (PS) placement cases (PS group), 14 unilateral intraductal PS (IS) placement cases (IS group), and 11 unilateral endoscopic nasobiliary drainage cases (ENBD group) met the inclusion criteria. Each group was compared in terms of the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), time to RBO (TRBO), overall survival (OS), and surgical outcomes. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in the patient characteristics between the groups. Hospital stay for the endoscopic procedure was significantly longer in the ENBD group (50 days [IQR, 33-163]) than in the PS group (14 days [IQR, 2-36]; P <.01) or IS group (21 days [IQR, 6-118]; P <.01). There were no significant differences in the RBO, TRBO, OS, surgical time, amount of intraoperative blood loss, or postsurgical adverse events (AEs) between the groups. In the multivariate analysis, there were no significantly related factors for RBO, TRBO, OS, and postsurgical AEs. CONCLUSION The PS, IS, and ENBD groups showed similar clinical outcomes in liver resection cases for HCCA, excluding the hospital stay duration for the endoscopic procedure. Considering the hospital stay duration, unilateral PS and IS placement can be considered acceptable for transpapillary PBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Okuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Matsunami General Hospital, Gifu, Japan.
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan; Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Kota Shimojo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yosuke Ohashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yuhei Iwasa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akihiko Senju
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shota Iwata
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Tezuka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hironao Ichikawa
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Naoki Mita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shinya Uemura
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kensaku Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefecture General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefecture General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Eiichi Tomita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Matsunami General Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Masahito Shimizu
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marzioni M, Maroni L, Aabakken L, Carpino G, Groot Koerkamp B, Heimbach J, Khan S, Lamarca A, Saborowski A, Vilgrain V, Nault JC. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 2025:S0168-8278(25)00162-X. [PMID: 40348685 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2025] [Accepted: 03/12/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed significant advances in the imaging, molecular profiling, and systemic treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Despite this progress, the early detection, precise classification, and effective management of CCA remain challenging. Owing to recent developments and the significant differences in CCA subtypes, EASL commissioned a panel of experts to draft evidence-based recommendations on the management of extrahepatic CCA, comprising distal and perihilar CCA. Particular attention is given to the need for accurate classification systems, the integration of emerging molecular insights, and practical strategies for diagnosis and treatment that reflect real-world clinical scenarios.
Collapse
|
4
|
Olthof PB, Groot Koerkamp B. Intraoperative blood loss in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: should we aim below a certain cut-off? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2025; 14:279-281. [PMID: 40342758 PMCID: PMC12057500 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-2024-677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/11/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B. Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Olthof PB, Bouwense SAW, Bednarsch J, Dewulf M, Kazemier G, Maithel S, Jarnagin WR, Aldrighetti L, Roberts KJ, Troisi RI, Malago MM, Lang H, Alikhanov R, Ruzzenente A, Malik H, Charco R, Sparrelid E, Pratschke J, Cescon M, Nadalin S, Hagendoorn J, Schadde E, Hoogwater FJH, Schnitzbauer AA, Topal B, Lodge P, Olde Damink SWM, Neumann UP, Groot Koerkamp B. Failure to Rescue After Resection of Perhilar Cholangiocarcinoma in an International Multicenter Cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1762-1768. [PMID: 39404989 PMCID: PMC11811460 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16293-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to rescue (FTR) is defined as the inability to prevent death after the development of a complication. FTR is a parameter in evaluating multidisciplinary postoperative complication management. The aim of this study was to evaluate FTR rates after major liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and analyze factors associated with FTR. PATIENTS AND METHOD Patients who underwent major liver resection for pCCA at 27 centers were included. FTR was defined as the presence of a Dindo grade III or higher complication followed by death within 90 days after surgery. Liver failure ISGLS grade B/C were scored. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify predictors of FTR and reported using odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS In the 2186 included patients, major morbidity rate was 49%, 90-day mortality rate 13%, and FTR occurred in 24% of patients with a grade III or higher complication. Across centers, major complication rate varied from 19 to 87%, 90-day mortality rate from 5 to 33%, and FTR ranged from 11 to 50% across hospitals. Age [1.04 (1.02-1.05) years], ASA 3 or 4 [1.40 (1.01-1.95)], jaundice at presentation [1.79 (1.16-2.76)], right-sided resection [1.45 (1.06-1.98)], and annual hospital volume < 6 [1.44 (1.07-1.94)] were positively associated with FTR. When liver failure is included, the odds ratio for FTR is 9.58 (6.76-13.68). CONCLUSION FTR occurred in 24% of patients after resection for pCCA. Liver failure was associated with a nine-fold increase of FTR and hospital volume below six was also associated with an increased risk of FTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Universitats Klinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Maxime Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shishir Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele Univeristy, Milan, Italy
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo M Malago
- Department of HPB- and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Royal Free Hospitals, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Transplantation, Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ramón Charco
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department for Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre/Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Lodge
- Division of Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Universitats Klinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ten Haaft BHEA, Sickmann MMT, Nooijen LE, Ali M, Wilmink JW, Klümpen HJ, Swijnenburg RJ, Zonderhuis BM, Besselink MG, Kazemier G, Erdmann JI. Gemcitabine-cisplatin induction treatment in patients with locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (IMPACCA): A prospective registration study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024:109358. [PMID: 39638652 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Induction treatment may be beneficial in patients with unresectable locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (LAPCCA). Prospective studies are currently lacking. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction treatment in patients with unresectable LAPCCA. METHODS In this prospective single-center registration study, consecutive patients with unresectable LAPCCA who received induction treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin in an intent to downsize the tumor to allow for resection were included. The primary outcomes were resection rate and overall survival. RESULTS Overall, 265 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were screened between January 2020 and June 2023, of whom 23 patients (9%) with unresectable LAPCCA met the eligibility criteria. Eight patients (35%) became eligible for resection, of whom six ultimately underwent resection (resection rate, 26% (11-42%)). Two out of 23 patients (9%) experienced adverse events grade≥3, forcing one to stop induction treatment. Compared to baseline, CA19.9 levels decreased by 42% (95 % CI, -65 to -5%; P = 0.039) and 8% (-44 to 112%; P = 0.80) at the first and second restaging, respectively. Tumor size did not significantly decrease after chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 27 months (18-36), with 40 (24-56) in the resected and 19 (13-26) in the unresected group (P = 0.127). CONCLUSION Patients with LAPCCA frequently tolerate induction gemcitabine-cisplatin, leading to a 26% resection rate with 40 months overall survival. These findings support routine re-staging after three to six cycles of palliative treatment, and lay the groundwork for future prospective trials in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britte H E A Ten Haaft
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mélise M T Sickmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lynn E Nooijen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mahsoem Ali
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara M Zonderhuis
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Keulen AM, Buettner S, Olthof PB, Klümpen HJ, Erdmann JI, Izquierdo-Sanchez L, Banales JM, Goeppert B, Roessler S, Zieniewicz K, Lamarca A, Valle JW, La Casta A, Hoogwater FJH, Donadon M, Scheiter A, Marzioni M, Adeva J, Kiudeliene E, Fernández JMU, Vidili G, Mocan T, Fabris L, Krawczyk M, Folseraas T, Dopazo C, Detry O, Voiosu T, Scripcariu V, Biancaniello F, Braconi C, Macias RIR, Groot Koerkamp B. Comparing Survival of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma After R1 Resection Versus Palliative Chemotherapy for Unresected Localized Disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:6495-6503. [PMID: 38896226 PMCID: PMC11413094 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15582-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a complex procedure with a high risk of postoperative mortality and early disease recurrence. The objective of this study was to compare patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) between pCCA patients who underwent an R1 resection and patients with localized pCCA who received palliative systemic chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with a diagnosis of pCCA between 1997-2021 were identified from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA) registry. pCCA patients who underwent an R1 resection were compared with patients with localized pCCA (i.e., nonmetastatic) who were ineligible for surgical resection and received palliative systemic chemotherapy. The primary outcome was OS. RESULTS Overall, 146 patients in the R1 resection group and 92 patients in the palliative chemotherapy group were included. The palliative chemotherapy group more often underwent biliary drainage (95% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) and had more vascular encasement on imaging (70% vs. 49%, p = 0.012) and CA 19.9 was more frequently >200 IU/L (64 vs. 45%, p = 0.046). Median OS was comparable between both groups (17.1 vs. 16 months, p = 0.06). Overall survival at 5 years after diagnosis was 20.0% with R1 resection and 2.2% with chemotherapy. Type of treatment (i.e., R1 resection or palliative chemotherapy) was not an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.07). CONCLUSIONS Palliative systemic chemotherapy should be considered instead of resection in patients with a high risk of both R1 resection and postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Izquierdo-Sanchez
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain
- National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III" (ISCIII), CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus M Banales
- Department of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain
- National Institute for the Study of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III" (ISCIII), CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Benjamin Goeppert
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Liestal, Switzerland
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Roessler
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Angela Lamarca
- Department of Oncology - OncoHealth Institute, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation, Manchester, England
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation, Manchester, England
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adelaida La Casta
- Medical Oncology Department, OSI Donostialdea/Biodonostia, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Frederik J H Hoogwater
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Marzioni
- Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universita Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jorge Adeva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Edita Kiudeliene
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | - Gianpaolo Vidili
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Day Hospital of the Medical Area, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, AOU, Sassari, Italy
| | - Tudor Mocan
- Babeș-Bolyai University - UBB Med Department, Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Luca Fabris
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua School of Medicine, Padua, Italy
- Digestive Disease Section, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Marcin Krawczyk
- Laboratory of Metabolic Liver Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
| | - Trine Folseraas
- Section of Gastroenterology and the Norwegian PSC Research Center, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cristina Dopazo
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplants, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Theodor Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Colentina Clinical Hospital, UMF Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Viorel Scripcariu
- University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr T Popa", Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania
| | - Francesca Biancaniello
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Braconi
- Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London, Surrey, UK
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rocio I R Macias
- Experimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEPHARM) Group, University of Salamanca, IBSAL, CIBERehd, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaneko J, Kiuchi R, Takinami M, Ohnishi I, Ito J, Jindo O, Nishino M, Takahashi Y, Yamada T, Sakaguchi T. Successful intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma conversion surgery after administration of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor. Clin J Gastroenterol 2024; 17:936-942. [PMID: 38985249 PMCID: PMC11436442 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-024-02014-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
We describe a case of a 47-year-old male patient with initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the right liver lobe with tumor thrombi extending from the right bile duct to the common and left bile ducts. Conventional chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for 19 months resulted in progressive disease. Subsequently, a comprehensive genome profile revealed fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 rearrangement, and hence, pemigatinib administration was initiated. After 6 months of pemigatinib therapy, significant shrinking of the tumor and disappearance of the tumor thrombi in the common and left bile duct were observed. Subsequently, the patient underwent conversion surgery, resulting in successful radical resection of the tumor. The patient has been disease-free for 7 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata City Hospital, 512-3 Ookubo, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan.
| | - Ryota Kiuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masaki Takinami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata City Hospital, 512-3 Ookubo, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
- Department of Cancer Genome Medical Center, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ippei Ohnishi
- Division of Pathology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Jun Ito
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Osamu Jindo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nishino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata City Hospital, 512-3 Ookubo, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yurimi Takahashi
- Department of Hepatology, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takanori Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iwata City Hospital, 512-3 Ookubo, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takanori Sakaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
- Department of Cancer Genome Medical Center, Iwata City Hospital, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neuzillet C, Decraecker M, Larrue H, Ntanda-Nwandji LC, Barbier L, Barge S, Belle A, Chagneau C, Edeline J, Guettier C, Huguet F, Jacques J, Le Bail B, Leblanc S, Lewin M, Malka D, Ronot M, Vendrely V, Vibert É, Bureau C, Bourliere M, Ganne-Carrie N, Blanc JF. Management of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Guidelines of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF). Liver Int 2024; 44:2517-2537. [PMID: 38967424 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Neuzillet
- GI Oncology, Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Versailles Saint-Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Marie Decraecker
- Oncology Digestive Unit, INSERM U1312, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hélène Larrue
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital, Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Louise Barbier
- New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit and HPB Surgery, Te Toka Tumai, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sandrine Barge
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Créteil-CHI Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Julien Edeline
- Department of Medical Oncology, CLCC Eugène Marquis, COSS-UMR S1242, INSERM, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Catherine Guettier
- Department of Pathology, APHP University Paris Saclay, Hôpital Bicetre, Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Tenon Hospital, APHP-Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | - Brigitte Le Bail
- Pathology Department, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Sarah Leblanc
- Gastroenterology Department, Private Hospital Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Maïté Lewin
- Service de Radiologie, AP-HP-Université Paris Saclay Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - David Malka
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Mutualiste Monsouris, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Beaujon Hospital, APHP Nord Clichy, University Paris Cité, CRI UMR, Paris, France
| | | | - Éric Vibert
- Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP-Université Paris Saclay Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Bureau
- Department of Hepatology, University Hospital, Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Jean-Frédéric Blanc
- Oncology Digestive Unit, INSERM U1312, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Orimo T, Hirakawa S, Taketomi A, Tachimori H, Oshikiri T, Miyata H, Kakeji Y, Shirabe K. Risk model for morbidity and mortality following liver surgery based on a national Japanese database. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:896-916. [PMID: 39229562 PMCID: PMC11368509 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim We evaluated the morbidity and mortality associated with liver surgery in Japan and developed a risk model for liver resection using information from a national database. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 73 861 Japanese patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2014 and 2019, using information from the National Clinical Database (NCD) registrations. The primary endpoints were 30 days and in-hospital mortality, and the secondary endpoints were postoperative complications. Logistic regression risk models for postoperative morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy were constructed based on preoperative clinical parameters and types of liver resection, and validated using a bootstrapping method. Results The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 0.9% and 1.7%, respectively. Trisectionectomy, hepatectomy for gallbladder cancer, hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and poor activities of daily living were statistically significant risk factors with high odds ratios for both postoperative morbidity and mortality. Internal validations indicated that the c-indices for 30-day and in-hospital mortality were 0.824 and 0.839, respectively. Conclusions We developed a risk model for liver resection by using a national surgical database that can predict morbidity and mortality based on preoperative factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Orimo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Shinya Hirakawa
- Endowed Course for Health System InnovationKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IHokkaido University Graduate School of MedicineSapporoJapan
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Hisateru Tachimori
- Endowed Course for Health System InnovationKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Taro Oshikiri
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Miyata
- Department of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of MedicineThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Database CommitteeThe Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological SurgeryTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ishiwatari H, Sato J, Sakamoto H, Doi T, Ono H. Current status of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for distal and hilar biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:969-980. [PMID: 38629308 DOI: 10.1111/den.14786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is to reduce complications during the perioperative period. The extrahepatic bile duct comprises distal and hilar bile ducts and assessing the need for PBD must be considered separately for each duct, as surgical procedures and morbidities vary. The representative disease-causing distal bile duct obstruction is pancreatic cancer. A randomized controlled trial has revealed that PBD carries the risk of recurrent cholangitis and pancreatitis before surgery, thus eliminating the need for PBD when early surgery is feasible. However, neoadjuvant therapy has seen a rise in recent years, resulting in longer preoperative waiting periods and an increased demand for PBD. In such cases, metal stents are preferable to plastic stents due to their lower stent occlusion rates. When endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage (EBD) is not viable, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage may be a suitable substitute. In the hilar bile duct, the representative disease-causing obstruction is hilar cholangiocarcinoma. PBD's necessity has long been a subject of contention. In spite of earlier criticisms of routine PBD, recent views have emerged recommending PBD, particularly when major hepatectomy is required, to prevent postoperative liver failure. Given the risk of tumor seeding associated with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage, EBD is preferable. Nevertheless, as its shortcomings involve recurrent cholangitis until surgery due to stent or tube obstruction, it is necessary to seek out novel approaches to circumvent complications. In this review we summarize the current evidence for PBD in patients with distal and hilar biliary obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Junya Sato
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sakamoto
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takuya Doi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goel M, Varty GP, Patkar S, Meghana V, Kazi M, Nandy K, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Gala KB, Shetty NS. Preventing futile surgery in Intrahepatic and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Can we identify preoperative factors to improve patient selection and optimize outcomes? Surg Oncol 2024; 55:102096. [PMID: 38964224 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative unresectability, postoperative deaths and early recurrences remain devastating futile events in the surgical management of Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA). The present study aims to determine the preoperative predictors of futile surgery in cholangiocarcinomas. METHODS Consecutive hepatectomies for iCCA and pCCA, between September 2010 and June 2022 were included. Futility of surgery was defined as either intraoperative unresectability, postoperative 30-day mortality or recurrence within six months of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of futility. RESULTS One hundred and fifty patients of iCCA and pCCA underwent surgery during the time period. Thirty-seven (38.1 %) out of 97 patients of iCCA and 25(47.16 %) out of 53 patients of pCCA underwent futile resection. The predictive factors of futile surgery for iCCA were tumour number (≥2) (OR, 9.705; 95%CI, 2.378-39.614; p = 0.002), serum aspartate transaminase (OR, 8.31; 95%CI, 2.796-24.703; p < 0.001) and serum CA-19.9 (>37 U/ml) (OR, 2.95; 95%CI, 1.051-8.283; p = 0.04). The predictive factors of futility for pCCA were lymph node involvement (OR, 7.636; 95%CI, 1.824-31.979; p = 0.005) and serum alkaline phosphatase (>562.5 U/L) (OR, 11.211; 95%CI, 1.752-71.750; p = 0.011). CONCLUSION Futile surgery was observed in over one third of our patients. Five strong preoperative predictors of futility were identified. Careful analysis of these factors may reduce futile surgical explorations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahesh Goel
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Gurudutt P Varty
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Shraddha Patkar
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - V Meghana
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Mufaddal Kazi
- Department of Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Kunal Nandy
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| | - Kunal B Gala
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| | - Nitin S Shetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vaghiri S, Prassas D, Kalmuk S, Buehler G, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Knoefel WT, Dizdar L, Alexander A. Comparative study of short-and long-term results in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing surgical resection: does the extent and side of resection really affect outcome? Minerva Surg 2024; 79:419-429. [PMID: 38953755 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.24.10326-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of perihilar carcinoma (pCCA) is still subject of ongoing debate. To provide more clarity, this study was conducted to evaluate outcomes related to the side and extent of heatectomy in patients with pCAA. METHODS A total of 32 patients with curative resection for pCCA were identified from our prospective database. Short-and long-term clinical outcome data and histopathological results were compared between right-sided (R-H) and left-sided (L-H) hepatectomy. RESULTS Nine patients (28.13%) underwent left-sided hepatectomy while a right-sided hepatectomy was accomplished in 23 patients (71.87%). In the R-H group hepatic conditioning of the future liver remnant (FLR) prior to extended resection was necessary in 13 cases (56.52%), and simultaneous pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 5 patients (21.74%). The arterial and portal venous reconstruction rates were 17.39% and 11.11% (P=1.00), and 60.87% and 33.33% (P=0.243) in the R-H and L-H groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences in short-term morbidity and mortality between both groups were observed. The rate of R0 resections was comparable (R-H: 78.26% versus L-H: 66.67%; P=0.654) resulting in similar long-term overall and disease-free survival rates after right-and left hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS In patients with pCCA, both right- and left-sided resections appear to be safe and feasible options with similar postoperative morbidity and oncologic outcomes. Consecutively, the ideal surgical approach should be patient-tailored based on anatomical considerations and the functional future liver capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Vaghiri
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Prassas
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Katholisches Klinikum Essen, Philippusstift, Teaching Hospital of Duisburg-Essen University, Essen, Germany
| | - Sinan Kalmuk
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Geoffrey Buehler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Nadja Lehwald-Tywuschik
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Wolfram T. Knoefel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany -
| | - Levent Dizdar
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Alexander
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Olthof PB, Erdmann JI, Alikhanov R, Charco R, Guglielmi A, Hagendoorn J, Hakeem A, Hoogwater FJH, Jarnagin WR, Kazemier G, Lang H, Maithel SK, Malago M, Malik HZ, Nadalin S, Neumann U, Olde Damink SWM, Pratschke J, Ratti F, Ravaioli M, Roberts KJ, Schadde E, Schnitzbauer AA, Sparrelid E, Topal B, Troisi RI, Groot Koerkamp B. Higher Postoperative Mortality and Inferior Survival After Right-Sided Liver Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Left-Sided Resection is Preferred When Possible. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4405-4412. [PMID: 38472674 PMCID: PMC11164810 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A right- or left-sided liver resection can be considered in about half of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), depending on tumor location and vascular involvement. This study compared postoperative mortality and long-term survival of right- versus left-sided liver resections for pCCA. METHODS Patients who underwent major liver resection for pCCA at 25 Western centers were stratified according to the type of hepatectomy-left, extended left, right, and extended right. The primary outcomes were 90-day mortality and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Between 2000 and 2022, 1701 patients underwent major liver resection for pCCA. The 90-day mortality was 9% after left-sided and 18% after right-sided liver resection (p < 0.001). The 90-day mortality rates were 8% (44/540) after left, 11% (29/276) after extended left, 17% (51/309) after right, and 19% (108/576) after extended right hepatectomy (p < 0.001). Median OS was 30 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 27-34) after left and 23 months (95% CI 20-25) after right liver resection (p < 0.001), and 33 months (95% CI 28-38), 27 months (95% CI 23-32), 25 months (95% CI 21-30), and 21 months (95% CI 18-24) after left, extended left, right, and extended right hepatectomy, respectively (p < 0.001). A left-sided resection was an independent favorable prognostic factor for both 90-day mortality and OS compared with right-sided resection, with similar results after excluding 90-day fatalities. CONCLUSIONS A left or extended left hepatectomy is associated with a lower 90-day mortality and superior OS compared with an (extended) right hepatectomy for pCCA. When both a left and right liver resection are feasible, a left-sided liver resection is preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Transplantation, Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ramón Charco
- Department of HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Centre/Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Abdul Hakeem
- Division of Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Massimo Malago
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University College London, Royal Free Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulf Neumann
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-KlinikumCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für AllgemeinViszeral und Transplantationschirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HBP, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Olthof PB, Groot Koerkamp B. ASO Author Reflections: Surgical Strategy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4454-4455. [PMID: 38448738 PMCID: PMC11164771 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15156-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koelfat KV, Schaap FG, van Mierlo KM, Leníček M, Sauer I, van der Kroft G, Röth AA, Bednarsch J, Amygdalos I, Lurje G, Dewulf MJ, Lang SA, Neumann UP, Olde Damink SW. Partial liver resection alters the bile salt-FGF19 axis in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for liver regeneration. Hepatol Commun 2024; 8:e0445. [PMID: 38836805 PMCID: PMC11155560 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended liver resection is the only treatment option for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Bile salts and the gut hormone FGF19, both promoters of liver regeneration (LR), have not been investigated in patients undergoing resection for pCCA. We aimed to evaluate the bile salt-FGF19 axis perioperatively in pCCA and study its effects on LR. METHODS Plasma bile salts, FGF19, and C4 (bile salt synthesis marker) were assessed in patients with pCCA and controls (colorectal liver metastases), before and after resection on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 7. Hepatic bile salts were determined in intraoperative liver biopsies. RESULTS Partial liver resection in pCCA elicited a sharp decline in bile salt and FGF19 plasma levels on POD 1 and remained low thereafter, unlike in controls, where bile salts rose gradually. Preoperatively, suppressed C4 in pCCA normalized postoperatively to levels similar to those in the controls. The remnant liver volume and postoperative bilirubin levels were negatively associated with postoperative C4 levels. Furthermore, patients who developed postoperative liver failure had nearly undetectable C4 levels on POD 7. Hepatic bile salts strongly predicted hyperbilirubinemia on POD 7 in both groups. Finally, postoperative bile salt levels on day 7 were an independent predictor of LR. CONCLUSIONS Partial liver resection alters the bile salt-FGF19 axis, but its derailment is unrelated to LR in pCCA. Postoperative monitoring of circulating bile salts and their production may be useful for monitoring LR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran V.K. Koelfat
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank G. Schaap
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim M.C. van Mierlo
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Leníček
- Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, First Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ilka Sauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gregory van der Kroft
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Anjali A.J. Röth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Iakovos Amygdalos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Georg Lurje
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Maxime J.L. Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sven A. Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P. Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Steven W.M. Olde Damink
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre & NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brown KT, Chou JF, Suchy HB, Getrajdman GI, Gonen M, Covey AM, Brody LA, Schattner MA, D'Angelica MI, Kingham TP, Erinjeri JP, Jarnagin WR. Outcome of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and previous biliary instrumentation: an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:181. [PMID: 38783208 PMCID: PMC11118511 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the outcome of previously untreated patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who present to a cancer referral center with or without pre-existing trans-papillary biliary drainage. METHODS Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma presenting between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, were identified from a prospective surgical database and by a query of the institutional database. Of 237 patients identified, 106 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Clinical information was obtained from the Electronic Medical Record and imaging studies were reviewed in the Picture Archiving and Communication System. RESULTS 73 of 106 patients (69%) presenting with a new diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma underwent trans-papillary biliary drainage (65 endoscopic and 8 percutaneous) prior to presentation at our institution. 8 of the 73 patients with trans-papillary biliary drainage (11%) presented with and 5 developed cholangitis; all 13 (18%) required subsequent intervention; none of the patients without trans-papillary biliary drainage presented with or required drainage for cholangitis (p = 0.008). Requiring drainage for cholangitis was more likely to delay treatment (p = 0.012) and portended a poorer median overall survival (13.6 months, 95%CI [4.08, not reached)] vs. 20.6 months, 95%CI [18.34, 37.51] p = 0.043). CONCLUSION Trans-papillary biliary drainage for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma carries a risk of cholangitis and should be avoided when possible. Clinical and imaging findings of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma should prompt evaluation at a cancer referral center before any intervention. This would mitigate development of cholangitis necessitating additional drainage procedures, delaying treatment and potentially compromising survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen T Brown
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Joanne F Chou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hannah B Suchy
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - George I Getrajdman
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne M Covey
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Schattner
- Division of Gastroenterology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph P Erinjeri
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery Division, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Weil Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yamada R, Kuriyama N, Tanaka T, Nose K, Nakamura Y, Miwata T, Tsuboi J, Mizuno S, Nakagawa H. Inside stent placement is suitable for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:174. [PMID: 38769494 PMCID: PMC11106890 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03266-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) is commonly used for preoperative drainage of localized perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (LPHC). This study retrospectively compared the utility of inside stent (IS) and conventional stent (CS) for preoperative EBS in patients with LPHC. METHODS EBS was performed in 56 patients with LPHC. EBS involved the placement of a CS (n = 32) or IS (n = 24). Treatment outcomes were compared between these two groups. RESULTS Preoperative recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) occurred in 23 patients (71.9%) in the CS group and 7 (29.2%) in the IS group, with a significant difference (p = 0.002). The time to RBO (TRBO) was significantly longer in IS than in CS (log-rank: p < 0.001). The number of stent replacements was significantly lower in IS than CS [0.38 (0-3) vs. 1.88 (0-8), respectively; p < 0.001]. Gemcitabine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered to 26 patients (46.4%). Among patients who received NAC, TRBO was longer in IS than in CS group (log-rank: p < 0.001). The IS group had a significantly shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stay than the CS group (20.0 vs. 37.0 days; p = 0.024, and 33.5 vs. 41.5 days; p = 0.016). Both the preoperative and the postoperative costs were significantly lower in the IS group than in the CS group (p = 0.049 and p = 0.0034, respectively). CONCLUSION Compared with CS, IS for preoperative EBS in LPHC patients resulted in fewer complications and lower re-intervention rates. The fact that the IS group had shorter preoperative and postoperative hospital stays and lower costs both preoperatively and postoperatively compared to the CS group may suggest that the use of IS has the potential to benefit not only the patient but also the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Yamada
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan.
| | - Naohisa Kuriyama
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Takamitsu Tanaka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Kenji Nose
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Nakamura
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Miwata
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Junya Tsuboi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| | - Shugo Mizuno
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Hayato Nakagawa
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie-prefecture, 514-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhao H, Li B, Li X, Lv X, Guo T, Dai Z, Zhang C, Zhang J. Dynamic three-dimensional liver volume assessment of liver regeneration in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1375648. [PMID: 38706591 PMCID: PMC11067054 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1375648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) undergoing hemi-hepatectomy, there are controversies regarding the requirement of, indications for, and timing of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD). Dynamic three-dimensional volume reconstruction could effectively evaluate the regeneration of liver after surgery, which may provide assistance for exploring indications for PBD and optimal preoperative bilirubin value. The purpose of this study was to explore the indications for PBD and the optimal preoperative bilirubin value to improve prognosis for HC patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of HC patients who underwent hemi-hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from 2012 to 2023. The liver regeneration rate was calculated using three-dimensional volume reconstruction. We analyzed the factors affecting the liver regeneration rate and occurrence of postoperative liver insufficiency. Results This study involved 83 patients with HC, which were divided into PBD group (n=36) and non-PBD group (n=47). The preoperative bilirubin level may be an independent risk factor affecting the liver regeneration rate (P=0.014) and postoperative liver insufficiency (P=0.016, odds ratio=1.016, β=0.016, 95% CI=1.003-1.029). For patients whose initial bilirubin level was >200 μmol/L (n=45), PBD resulted in better liver regeneration in the early stage (P=0.006) and reduced the incidence of postoperative liver insufficiency [P=0.012, odds ratio=0.144, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.031-0.657]. The cut-off value of bilirubin was 103.15 μmol/L based on the liver regeneration rate. Patients with a preoperative bilirubin level of ≤103.15 μmol/L shown a better liver regeneration (P<0.01) and lower incidence of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (P=0.011, odds ratio=0.067, 95% CI=0.008-0.537). Conclusion For HC patients undergoing hemi-hepatectomy whose initial bilirubin level is >200 μmol/L, PBD may result in better liver regeneration and reduce the incidence of postoperative liver insufficiency. Preoperative bilirubin levels ≤103.15 μmol/L maybe recommended for leading to a better liver regeneration and lower incidence of postoperative hepatic insufficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoyu Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Baifeng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaohang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiangning Lv
- Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tingwei Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zongbo Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Chengshuo Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jialin Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bröring TS, Wagner KC, von Hahn T, Oldhafer KJ. Parenchyma-Preserving Hepatectomy in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Chance for Critical Patients? Visc Med 2024; 40:53-60. [PMID: 38584859 PMCID: PMC10995988 DOI: 10.1159/000537884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Extended liver resection (EXT) increases R0 resection rate and survival; however, patients with high perioperative risk are not suitable for extended resection. This study aimed to compare overall survival and surgical morbidity in patients with extended liver resection and parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy (PPH). Methods Between January 2010 and November 2020, 113 consecutive patients with pCCA underwent surgery at our institution. Eighty-two patients were resected in curative intent. Sixty-four patients received extended liver resection, and 18 patients PPH. Outcomes of resections were evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with PPH compared to extended liver resection (log-rank p = 0.286). Patients with PPH experienced lower rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. There was no case of in-house mortality in PPH-resected patients compared to 10 cases (16%) in patients that received EXT (p = 0.073). Conclusion PPH shows similar overall survival with lower rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Our findings support the role of a PPH, in selected patients with pCCA, that are not suitable for extended resection due to increased perioperative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias S. Bröring
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
- Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kim C. Wagner
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
- Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl J. Oldhafer
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
- Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dar FS, Abbas Z, Ahmed I, Atique M, Aujla UI, Azeemuddin M, Aziz Z, Bhatti ABH, Bangash TA, Butt AS, Butt OT, Dogar AW, Farooqi JI, Hanif F, Haider J, Haider S, Hassan SM, Jabbar AA, Khan AN, Khan MS, Khan MY, Latif A, Luck NH, Malik AK, Rashid K, Rashid S, Salih M, Saeed A, Salamat A, Tayyab GUN, Yusuf A, Zia HH, Naveed A. National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1018-1042. [PMID: 38577184 PMCID: PMC10989497 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Saud Dar
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Dr. Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi 75600, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
- University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen B24 3FX, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Atique
- Department of Pathology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Usman Iqbal Aujla
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | | | - Zeba Aziz
- Department of Oncology, Hameed Latif Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Tariq Ali Bangash
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amna Subhan Butt
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Osama Tariq Butt
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wahab Dogar
- Department of Liver Transplant, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | - Javed Iqbal Farooqi
- Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Lifecare Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
| | - Faisal Hanif
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Jahanzaib Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Siraj Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Syed Mujahid Hassan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | | | - Aman Nawaz Khan
- Department of Radiology, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shoaib Khan
- Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Yasir Khan
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amer Latif
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Nasir Hassan Luck
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
| | - Ahmad Karim Malik
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Kamran Rashid
- Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Sohail Rashid
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Mohammad Salih
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Abdullah Saeed
- Department of Radiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Salamat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Quaid-e-Azam International Hospital, Rawalpindi 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ghias-un-Nabi Tayyab
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Aasim Yusuf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Haseeb Haider Zia
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ammara Naveed
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tzedakis S, Belle A, Berzan D, Nassar A, Dohan A, Coriat R, Sindayigaya R, Fuks D. Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Definite Biliary Drainage in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Laparoscopic Resection: A Hybrid Minimal-Invasive Technique. Surg Innov 2024; 31:11-15. [PMID: 38130210 DOI: 10.1177/15533506231223916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Laparoscopic approach of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is still challenging. We report the original use of a endoscopic hepaticogastrostomy (EHG) for definite biliary drainage in order to avoid biliary reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 70-year-old man presenting with jaundice was referred for resection of a Bismuth type IIIa PHC. Repeated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failed to drain the future liver remnant, enabling only right anterior liver section drainage. EHG was performed three weeks before surgery. A hepatogastric anastomosis was created, placing a half-coated self-expanding endoprosthesis between biliary duct of segment 2 and the lesser gastric curvature. RESULTS A laparoscopic right hepatectomy extended to segment 1, common bile duct, and hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy was performed. The left hepatic duct was sectioned and ligated downstream to the biliary confluence of segment 2-3 and 4 allowing exclusive biliary flow through the EHG. The patient was disease free at 12 months, postoperative outcomes were uneventful except three readmissions for acute cholangitis due to prosthesis obstruction. CONCLUSIONS EHG may be used as definite biliary drainage technique in laparoscopic PHC resection, at the expense of prosthesis obstruction and cholangitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Diana Berzan
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Antony Dohan
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Remy Sindayigaya
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Polyakov AN, Patyutko YI, Kotelnikov AG, Frantsev DY, Korshak AV, Uzbekova AA, Egenov OA, Pokataev IA, Savchenko IV, Podluzhny DV. [Surgical treatment and prognostic factors in perihilar tumors]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2024:14-23. [PMID: 38344956 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202402114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the results of surgical treatment in patients with perihilar tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 98 patients with perihilar tumors who underwent surgery. RESULTS We prefer percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n=58) for jaundice. Retrograde interventions were performed in 18 cases (20.5%), complications grade III-IV were more common (p=0.037) in the last group. Postoperative mortality was 12%. Complications developed in 81 patients (82.7%), grade ≥3 - in 39 (39.8%) cases. Portal vein resection (n=26) increased the incidence of complications grade ≥III (p=0.035) and portal vein thrombosis (p=0.0001). Chemotherapy after surgery was performed in 47 patients (48.0%), photodynamic therapy - in 7 (7.1%) patients. A 5-year overall survival was 28.1%, the median survival - 29 months. R2 resection and/or M1 stage (n=12) significantly worsened the prognosis and overall survival (16.5 vs. 31 months, p=0.0055). Lymph node (LN) lesion, microscopic status (R0 vs. R1) of resection margin, technique of decompression and isolated resection of extrahepatic bile ducts did not affect the prognosis, and we combined appropriate patients (n=72) for analysis. SI resection and excision of ≥6 lymph nodes were independent positive factors for disease-free survival (p=0.042 and p=0.007, respectively). Blood transfusion and high preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte index (NLI ≥2.15) worsened overall (p=0.009 and p=0.002, respectively) and disease-free survival (p=0.002 and 0.007, respectively). The absence of adjuvant therapy worsened disease-free survival alone (p=0.024). CONCLUSION SI liver resection, adequate lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy should be used for perihilar tumors. Isolated resection of extrahepatic bile ducts is permissible in some cases. Blood transfusion and NLI ≥2.15 are independent negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A N Polyakov
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Yu I Patyutko
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A G Kotelnikov
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - D Yu Frantsev
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A V Korshak
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - A A Uzbekova
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - O A Egenov
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Pokataev
- Moscow City Clinical Oncology Hospital No.1, Moscow, Russia
| | - I V Savchenko
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - D V Podluzhny
- Blokhin National Medical Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Keulen AM, Olthof PB, Buettner S, Bednarsch J, Verheij J, Erdmann JI, Nooijen LE, Porte RJ, Minnee RC, Murad SD, Neumann UP, Heij L, Groot Koerkamp B, Doukas M. The Influence of Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis on Postoperative Outcomes After Major Liver Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:133-141. [PMID: 37899413 PMCID: PMC10695871 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14419-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with high operative risks. Impaired liver regeneration in patients with pre-existing liver disease may contribute to posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and postoperative mortality. This study aimed to determine the incidence of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and their association with PHLF and 90-day postoperative mortality in pCCA patients. METHODS Patients who underwent a major liver resection for pCCA were included in the study between 2000 and 2021 from three tertiary referral hospitals. Histopathologic assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis was performed. The primary outcomes were PHLF and 90-day mortality. RESULTS Of the 401 included patients, steatosis was absent in 334 patients (83.3%), mild in 58 patients (14.5%) and moderate to severe in 9 patients (2.2%). There was no fibrosis in 92 patients (23.1%), periportal fibrosis in 150 patients (37.6%), septal fibrosis in 123 patients (30.8%), and biliary cirrhosis in 34 patients (8.5%). Steatosis (≥ 5%) was not associated with PHLF (odds ratio [OR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-2.68) or 90-day mortality (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.62-2.39). Neither was fibrosis (i.e., periportal, septal, or biliary cirrhosis) associated with PHLF (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.41-1.41) or 90-day mortality (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.33-1.06). The independent risk factors for PHLF were preoperative cholangitis (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1. 36-4.17) and future liver remnant smaller than 40% (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.31-4.38). The independent risk factors for 90-day mortality were age of 65 years or older (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.36-4.23) and preoperative cholangitis (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.30-3.87). CONCLUSION In this study, no association could be demonstrated between hepatic steatosis or fibrosis and postoperative outcomes after resection of pCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Buettner
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Bednarsch
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Joanne Verheij
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lynn E Nooijen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Minnee
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sarwa Darwish Murad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lara Heij
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Ramouz A, Khajeh E, Hammad A, Hackert T, Müller-Stich B, Strobel O, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Ghamarnejad O, Al-Saeedi M, Springfeld C, Rupp C, Mayer P, Mieth M, Goeppert B, Hoffmann K, Büchler MW. Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5613. [PMID: 38067316 PMCID: PMC10705795 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammad Golriz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ali Ramouz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elias Khajeh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmed Hammad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Strobel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Omid Ghamarnejad
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mohammed Al-Saeedi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Springfeld
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Rupp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mayer
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Mieth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Goeppert
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katrin Hoffmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Liver Cancer Center Heidelberg (LCCH), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W. Büchler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Aoki Y, Noji T, Tanaka K, Matsui A, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Hirano S. Validation study for prognostic scoring system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma surgery using preoperative factors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:430. [PMID: 37938415 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03145-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recently, systemic inflammatory responses (SIR) have been shown to play a pivotal role in the development and progression of cancer. We previously reported that four factors, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (> 7 ng/dL), serum albumin (< 3.5 g/dL), C-reactive protein (> 0.5 mg/dL), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR; > 150), were independent prognostic factors after perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) surgery. We also advocated a prognosis predictive preoperative prognostic score (PPS) using these four factors and showed that PPS could predict patients' prognosis on survival. This retrospective study sought to validate preoperatively available prognostic factors for survival after major hepatectomy as reported previously, including PPS for PHCC. METHODS We retrospectively validated our PPS score and reported SIR scoring systems using the data of 125 consecutive patients who underwent PHCC surgery from January 2010 to November 2020. RESULTS PPS was an independent preoperative prognostic factors for survival. The T and N categories were independent prognostic factors. Other SIR scores were not independent preoperative factors in the univariate analysis. Among SIR scores, only the PPS was found to be associated with OS and disease-free survival. The PPS was also associated with histopathological factors (T and N categories). CONCLUSION PPS could be useful in predicting long-term survival after PHCC and may be a more useful scoring system than other SIR systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuma Aoki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
| | - Kimitaka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Aya Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Nakanishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toshimichi Asano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toru Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuchikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita-15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ratti F, Marino R, Catena M, Pascale MM, Buonanno S, De Cobelli F, Aldrighetti L. The failure to rescue factor: aftermath analyses on 224 cases of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1919-1939. [PMID: 37452927 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01589-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
The term "failure to rescue" (FTR) has been recently introduced in the field of hepato-biliary surgery to label cases in which major postoperative complications lead to postoperative fatality. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) surgery has consistently high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in which factors associated with FTR are yet to be discovered. The primary endpoint of this study is to compare the Rescue with the FTR cohort referencing patients' characteristics and management protocols applied. A cohort of 224 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for PHC, between 2010 and 2021, was enrolled. Perioperative variables were analyzed according to the severity of major postoperative complications (Clavien ≥ 3a). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to determine complications' impact on survival. Major complications were reported in 86 cases (38%). Among the major complications' cohort, 72 cases (84%) were graded Clavien 3a-4 (Rescue group), while 14 (16%) cases were graded Clavien 5 (FTR group). Number of lymph-node metastases (OR = 1.33 (1.08-1.63) p = 0.006), poorly differentiated (G3) adenocarcinoma (OR = 7.55 (1.24-45.8) p = 0.028, reintervention (OR = 16.47 (2.76-98.08) p = 0.002), and prognostic nutritional index < 40 (OR = 3.01 (2.265-3.654) p < 0.001) rates were independent predictors of FTR. Right resection side (OR 2.4 (1.33-4.34) p = 0.004) increased the odds of major complications but not of FTR. No difference in overall survival was identified. A distinction of perioperative factors associated with postoperative complications' severity is crucial. Patients developing severe outcomes seem to have different biological and nutritional profiles, showing that efficient preoperative protocols are strategic to identify and avert the risk of FTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Rebecca Marino
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Catena
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maria Pascale
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Buonanno
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jena SS, Mehta NN, Nundy S. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Controversies and recommendations. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2023; 27:227-240. [PMID: 37408334 PMCID: PMC10472117 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hilar cholangiocarcinomas are highly aggressive malignancies. They are usually at an advanced stage at initial presentation. Surgical resection with negative margins is the standard of management. It provides the only chance of cure. Liver transplantation has increased the number of 'curative' procedures for cases previously considered to be unresectable. Meticulous and thorough preoperative planning is required to prevent fatal post-operative complications. Extended resection procedures, including hepatic trisectionectomy for Bismuth type IV tumors, hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors with extensive longitudinal spread, and combined vascular resection with reconstruction for tumors involving hepatic vascular structures, are challenging procedures with surgical indications expanded. Liver transplantation after the standardization of a neoadjuvant protocol described by the Mayo Clinic has increased the number of patients who can undergo operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvendu Sekhar Jena
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Naimish N Mehta
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Samiran Nundy
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dhar J, Gupta P, Samanta J. The role of endoscopy in malignant hilar obstruction. Ann Gastroenterol 2023; 36:347-359. [PMID: 37395999 PMCID: PMC10304524 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2023.0810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO) is a medical challenge as regards both forming a correct diagnosis and its adequate management, in terms of treatment alternatives and palliative options. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for the underlying disease, but the majority of patients are not suitable candidates because of an unresectable tumor or poor performance status. Biliary drainage (BD) can be achieved through the percutaneous transhepatic route or endoscopically, and the choice depends on a host of factors, including biliary anatomy and comorbidity of the patient. Though there is no consensus, the endoscopic approach is usually preferred over the former. Endoscopy can aid in both diagnosis (collection of histological as well as cytological samples, direct visualization of suspected malignant pathology, or use of endoscopic ultrasound [EUS] for evaluation and locoregional staging), and in achieving internal BD. Advances in the development of various stents, accessories and, more recently, the use of EUS have in fact further expanded its application in MHO management. The choice of stents to be used (type, make, and number), palliation methods, deployment techniques and the use of local ablative strategy are still evolving and require more data. The complexity of management of MHO mandates that each patient should receive a "personalized approach", all the way from establishing a diagnosis until final treatment, with the help of a multidisciplinary team effort. Herein, we provide a comprehensive literature review of the current role of endoscopy for MHO, according to its applications in various clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jahnvi Dhar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sohana Hospital, Mohali, Punjab (Jahnvi Dhar)
| | - Pankaj Gupta
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical College and Research, Chandigarh (Pankaj Gupta)
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical College and Research, Chandigarh (Jayanta Samanta), India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Berardi G, Lucarini A, Colasanti M, Mariano G, Ferretti S, Meniconi RL, Guglielmo N, Angrisani M, Usai S, Borcea MC, Canali G, Moschetta G, Ettorre GM. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Short- and Long-Term Results. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3048. [PMID: 37297010 PMCID: PMC10252826 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery and postoperative systemic chemotherapy represent the standard treatment for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) for hepatobiliary procedures has spread worldwide in the last two decades. Since resections for PHC are technically demanding, the role of MIS in this field is yet to be established. This study aimed to systematically review the existing literature on MIS for PHC, to evaluate its safety and its surgical and oncological outcomes. A systematic literature review on PubMed and SCOPUS was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Overall, a total of 18 studies reporting 372 MIS procedures for PHC were included in our analysis. A progressive increase in the available literature was observed over the years. A total of 310 laparoscopic and 62 robotic resections were performed. A pooled analysis showed an operative time ranging from 205.3 ± 23.9 and 840 (770-890) minutes, and intraoperative bleeding between 101.1 ± 13.6 and 1360 ± 809 mL. Minor and major morbidity rates were 43.9% and 12.7%, respectively, with a 5.6% mortality rate. R0 resections were achieved in 80.6% of patients and the number of retrieved lymph nodes ranged between 4 (3-12) and 12 (8-16). This systematic review shows that MIS for PHC is feasible, with safe postoperative and oncological outcomes. Recent data has shown encouraging results and more reports are being published. Future studies should address differences between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Given the management and technical challenges, MIS for PHC should be performed by experienced surgeons, in high-volume centers, on selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy; (A.L.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Parsons M, Lloyd S, Johnson S, Scaife C, Soares H, Kim R, Kim R, Garrido-Laguna I, Tao R. The Implications of Treatment Delays in Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Cholangiocarcinoma Patients. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:492-500. [PMID: 35445343 PMCID: PMC9020757 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00820-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to understand factors associated with timing of adjuvant therapy for cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of delays on overall survival (OS). METHODS Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with non-metastatic bile duct cancer from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed. Patients were included only if they underwent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (RT). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant or palliative treatments were excluded. Pearson's chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the distribution of demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients initiating therapy past various time points using Kaplan Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS In total, 7,733 of 17,363 (45%) patients underwent adjuvant treatment. The median time to adjuvant therapy initiation was 59 days (interquartile range 45-78 days). Age over 65, black and Hispanic race, and treatment with RT alone were associated with later initiation of adjuvant treatment. Patients with larger tumors and high-grade disease were more likely to initiate treatment early. After propensity score weighting, there was an OS decrement to initiation of treatment beyond the median of 59 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS We identified characteristics that are related to the timing of adjuvant therapy in patients with biliary cancers. There was an OS decrement associated with delays beyond the median time point of 59 days. This finding may be especially relevant given the treatment delays seen as a result of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Skyler Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Courtney Scaife
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Heloisa Soares
- Department of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Rebecca Kim
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Robin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Department of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, UT, Salt Lake City, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Balci D, Nadalin S, Mehrabi A, Alikhanov R, Fernandes ESM, Di Benedetto F, Hernandez-Alejandro R, Björnsson B, Efanov M, Capobianco I, Clavien PA, Kirimker EO, Petrowsky H. Revival of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: An international multicenter study with promising outcomes. Surgery 2023; 173:1398-1404. [PMID: 36959071 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has been considered to be contraindicated due to the initial poor results. Given the recent reports of improved outcomes, we aimed to collect the recent experiences of different centers performing associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to analyze factors related to improved outcomes. METHODS This proof-of-concept study collected contemporary cases of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyzed for morbidity, short and long-term survival, and factors associated with outcomes. RESULTS In total, 39 patients from 8 centers underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from 2010 to 2020. The median preoperative future liver remnant volume was 323 mL (155-460 mL). The median future liver remnant increase was 58.7% (8.9% -264.5%) with a median interstage interval of 13 days (6-60 days). Post-stage 1 and post-stage 2 biliary leaks occurred in 2 (7.7%) and 4 (15%) patients. Six patients (23%) after stage 1 and 6 (23%) after stage 2 experienced grade 3 or higher complications. Two patients (7.7%) died within 90 days after stage 2. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 92%, 69%, and 55%, respectively. A subgroup analysis revealed poor survival for patients undergoing additional vascular resection and lymph node positivity. Lymph node-negative patients showed excellent survival demonstrated by 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival of 86%, 86%, and 86%. CONCLUSION This study highlights that the critical attitude toward associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma needs to be revised. In selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy can achieve favorable survival that compares to the outcome of established surgical treatment strategies reported in benchmark studies for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma including 1-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Balci
- Department of Surgery, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center Named After Loginov A.S., Russia
| | - Eduardo S M Fernandes
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Adventista Silvestre, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Research Center Named After Loginov A.S., Russia
| | - Ivan Capobianco
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplant Center Zürich, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sato K, Shigekawa M, Kozumi K, Okabe J, Sato Y, Tamura T, Yoshioka T, Sakamori R, Iwagami Y, Yamada D, Tomimaru Y, Noda T, Takahashi H, Kobayashi S, Eguchi H, Tatsumi T, Takehara T. Initial drainage‐related prognostic factors for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single‐center retrospective study. DEN OPEN 2023; 3:e127. [PMID: 35898846 PMCID: PMC9307739 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCC) is a complex disorder involving the hepatic hilum. Multiple endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions are necessary for diagnosis and treatment with underlying cholangitis risk. Our aim is to clarify the initial‐drainage‐related prognostic factors of PCC. Methods This study was a single‐center retrospective study. A total of 104 consecutive patients diagnosed with PCC from January 2010 to February 2020 were enrolled. We defined the diagnostic period as the time between the first biliary drainage attempt and the final drainage when treatment, including surgery or chemotherapy, was started. We focused on this initial period and analyzed the endoscopy‐related factors that affected mortality. Results Overall survival of all PCC patients was 599 days. Overall survival of surgically treated patients and unresectable patients were 893 days and 512 days, respectively. In 48 surgically treated patients, drainage‐related cholangitis within the diagnostic period, defined as new cholangitis that occurred after the first biliary drainage attempt, worsened overall survival from 1460 days to 607 days. Endoscopic sphincterotomy, the first drainage method other than endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, and four or more endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions were risk factors for drainage‐related cholangitis. Drainage‐related cholangitis increased pathological lymph node metastasis. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage as final drainage was the only prognostic factor in unresectable chemotherapy‐treated patients. Conclusions Drainage‐related cholangitis worsened the prognosis in PCC patients who underwent surgery. Appropriate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategies, especially during the diagnostic period, are of great importance in PCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhiko Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Minoru Shigekawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Kozumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Junya Okabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Yu Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Takeshi Tamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Teppei Yoshioka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Ryotaro Sakamori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Iwagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Daisaku Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Yoshito Tomimaru
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Takehiro Noda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Shogo Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Tomohide Tatsumi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| | - Tetsuo Takehara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhou HF, Wang JL, Yang W, Zhou C, Shen Y, Wu LL, Pei ZL, Zhou WZ, Liu S, Shi HB. Survival prediction for patients with malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer undergoing biliary drainage: the COMBO-PaS model. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1943-1955. [PMID: 36261643 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09698-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with pancreatic cancer-caused biliary obstruction (PC-BO) have poor prognosis, but we lack of tools to predict survival for clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a model for survival prediction among patients with PC-BO. METHODS A total of 172 patients with PC-BO treated with percutaneous biliary drainage were randomly divided into a training group (n = 120) and a validation group (n = 52). The independent risk factors for overall survival were selected to develop a Cox model. The predictive performance of M stage, hepatic metastases, cancer antigen 199, and the Cox model was determined. Naples prognostic score (NPS), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) for 1-month mortality risk were compared with the Cox model. RESULTS The Cox model was developed based on total cholesterol, direct bilirubin, hepatic metastases, cancer antigen 199, stenosis type, and preprocedural infection (all P < 0.05), which named "COMBO-PaS." The COMBO-PaS model had the highest area under the curves (AUC) (0.801-0.933) comparing with other predictors (0.506-0.740) for 1-, 3-, and 6-month survival prediction. For 1-month mortality risk prediction, the COMBO-PaS model had the highest AUC of 0.829 comparing with NPS, PNI, and CONUT. CONCLUSION The COMBO-PaS model was useful for survival prediction among patients with PC-BO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Feng Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Jia-Lei Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Chun Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Yan Shen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Ling-Ling Wu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Zhong-Ling Pei
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Wei-Zhong Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Sheng Liu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Hai-Bin Shi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nooijen LE, Franssen S, Buis CI, Dejong CHC, den Dulk M, van Delden OM, Ijzermans JN, Groot Koerkamp B, Kazemier G, van Lienden K, Klümpen HJ, Kuipers H, Olij B, Porte RJ, Rauws EA, Voermans RP, van Gulik TM, Erdmann JI, Roos E, Coelen RJ. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of biliary drainage in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:210-217. [PMID: 36376222 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The DRAINAGE trial was a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative endoscopic (EBD) and percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with potentially resectable, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes. METHODS Patients were randomized in four tertiary referral centers. Follow-up data were available for all included patients. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were readmissions, and re-interventions not including in-trial interventions. RESULTS A total of 54 patients were randomized; 27 in both groups. Median follow-up for both groups was 62 months (95% CI 54-70). The median OS was 13 months (95% CI 7.9-18.1) in the EBD and 7 months (95% CI 0.0-17.2) in the PTBD group (P = 0.28). Twenty (37%, n = 8 EBD vs n = 12 PTBD, P = 0.43) of 54 patients were readmitted at least once, mostly due to drainage-related complications (n = 13, 24%). Of note, 14 out of the 54 patients died within the trial. A total of 76 drainage procedures (32 EBD and 44 PTBD) were performed in 28 patients. The median number of stent or drain placements was 2 (2-4) for the EBD group and 2 (1-3) for the PTBD group (P = 0.77). DISCUSSION Although this follow-up study represented a small cohort, no long-term differences in survival, readmissions, and drainage procedures for EBD and PTBD were found, even when comparing the resected and unresected group. However, this study demonstrates the complexity of biliary drainage for patients with potentially resectable pCCA, even in tertiary referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E Nooijen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn Franssen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carlijn I Buis
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan N Ijzermans
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn van Lienden
- RAKU, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Sciences, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrien Kuipers
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Erik A Rauws
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Roos
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Coelen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chang X, Korenblik R, Olij B, Knapen RRMM, van der Leij C, Heise D, den Dulk M, Neumann UP, Schaap FG, van Dam RM, Olde Damink SWM. Influence of cholestasis on portal vein embolization-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:54. [PMID: 36680689 PMCID: PMC9867667 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02784-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the pre-clinical setting, hepatocellular bile salt accumulation impairs liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Here, we study the impact of cholestasis on portal vein embolization (PVE)-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Patients were enrolled with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing PVE before a (extended) right hemihepatectomy. Volume of segments II/III was considered FLR and assessed on pre-embolization and post-embolization CT scans. The degree of hypertrophy (DH, percentual increase) and kinetic growth rate (KGR, percentage/week) were used to assess PVE-induced hypertrophy. RESULTS A total of 50 patients (31 CRLM, 19 pCCA) were included. After PVE, the DH and KGR were similar in patients with CRLM and pCCA (5.2 [3.3-6.9] versus 5.7 [3.2-7.4] %, respectively, p = 0.960 for DH; 1.4 [0.9-2.5] versus 1.9 [1.0-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 0.742 for KGR). Moreover, pCCA patients with or without hyperbilirubinemia had comparable DH (5.6 [3.0-7.5] versus 5.7 [2.4-7.0] %, respectively, p = 0.806) and KGR (1.7 [1.0-2.4] versus 1.9 [0.8-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 1.000). For patients with pCCA, unilateral drainage in FLR induced a higher DH than bilateral drainage (6.7 [4.9-7.9] versus 2.7 [1.5-4.2] %, p = 0.012). C-reactive protein before PVE was negatively correlated with DH (ρ = - 0.539, p = 0.038) and KGR (ρ = - 0.532, p = 0.041) in patients with pCCA. CONCLUSIONS There was no influence of cholestasis on FLR hypertrophy in patients undergoing PVE. Bilateral drainage and inflammation appeared to be negatively associated with FLR hypertrophy. Further prospective studies with larger and more homogenous patient cohorts are desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinwei Chang
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Remon Korenblik
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robrecht R. M. M. Knapen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P. Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank G. Schaap
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W. M. Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Otsubo T, Kobayashi S, Sano K, Misawa T, Katagiri S, Nakayama H, Suzuki S, Watanabe M, Ariizumi S, Unno M, Tanabe M, Nagano H, Kokudo N, Hirano S, Nakamura M, Shirabe K, Suzuki Y, Yoshida M, Takada Y, Nakagohri T, Horiguchi A, Ohdan H, Eguchi S, Ohtsuka M, Sho M, Rikiyama T, Hatano E, Taketomi A, Fujii T, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Yamamoto M, Takada T, Endo I. A nationwide certification system to increase the safety of highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:60-71. [PMID: 35611453 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To ensure that highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery (HBPS) is performed safely, the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) board certification system for expert surgeons established a safety committee to monitor surgical safety. METHODS We investigated postoperative mortality rates based on summary reports of numbers and outcomes of highly advanced HBPS submitted annually by the board-certified training institutions from 2012 to 2019. We also analyzed summary reports on mortality cases submitted by institutions with high 90-day post-HBPS mortality rates and recommended site visits and surveys as necessary. RESULTS Highly advanced HBPS was performed in 121 518 patients during the 8-year period. Thirty-day mortality rates from 2012 to 2019 were 0.92%, 0.8%, 0.61%, 0.63%, 0.70%, 0.59%, 0.48%, and 0.52%, respectively (P < .001). Ninety-day mortality rates were 2.1%, 1.82%, 1.62%, 1.28%, 1.46%, 1.22%, 1.19%, and 0.98%, respectively (P < .001). Summary reports were submitted by 20 hospitals between 2015 and 2019. Mortality rates before and after the start of report submission and audit were 5.72% and 2.79%, respectively (odds ratio 0.690, 95% confidence interval 0.487-0.977; P = .037). CONCLUSIONS Development of a system for designation of board-certified expert surgeons and safety management improved the mortality rate associated with highly advanced HBPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takehito Otsubo
- Division of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Shinjiro Kobayashi
- Division of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Keiji Sano
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeyuki Misawa
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katagiri
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hisashi Nakayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Manabu Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunichi Ariizumi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Minoru Tanabe
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Ken Shirabe
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health & Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yasutsugu Takada
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Japan
| | - Toshio Nakagohri
- Department of Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | - Akihiko Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Sho
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Toshiki Rikiyama
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Masaru Miyazaki
- Digestive Diseases Center, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Utsunomiya Memorial Hospital, Utsunomiya, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Takada
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Makino K, Ishii T, Yoh T, Ogiso S, Fukumitsu K, Seo S, Taura K, Hatano E. The usefulness of preoperative bile cultures for hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. Heliyon 2022; 8:e12226. [PMID: 36568677 PMCID: PMC9768314 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Infectious complications can cause lethal liver failure after hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. This study assessed the increased risk for postoperative infectious complications in patients who underwent hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction and explored the possibility of predicting pathogenic microorganisms causing postoperative infectious complications based on preoperative monitoring of bile cultures. Methods This study involved 310 patients who received major hepatectomy with or without biliary reconstruction at our institution between January 2010 and December 2019. The relationship between the microorganisms detected through perioperative monitoring of bile culture and those in the postoperative infectious foci was examined. Results Forty-nine patients underwent major hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction, and 261 received hepatectomy without biliary reconstruction. The multivariate analysis revealed hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications (odds ratio: 22.9, 95% confidence interval: 5.2-164.3) compared to hepatectomy without biliary reconstruction. In the patients with biliary reconstruction, the concordance rates between the microorganisms detected in the postoperative infectious foci and those in preoperative bile cultures were as follows: incisional surgical site infection (44.4%), organ/space surgical site infection (52.9%), bacteremia (47.1%), and pneumonia (16.7%); the concordance rates were high, and the risk of infection increased over time. Conclusions Biliary reconstruction is a significant risk factor for postoperative infectious complications, and preoperative bile cultures may aid in prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial agent selection.
Collapse
|
40
|
Keulen AMV, Gaspersz MP, van Vugt JLA, Roos E, Olthof PB, Coelen RJS, Bruno MJ, van Driel LMJW, Voermans RP, van Eijck CHJ, van Hooft JE, van Lienden KP, de Jonge J, Polak WG, Poley JW, Pek CJ, Moelker A, Willemssen FEJA, van Gulik TM, Erdmann JI, Hol L, IJzermans JNM, Büttner S, Koerkamp BG. Success, complication, and mortality rates of initial biliary drainage in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2022; 172:1606-1613. [PMID: 35989132 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma require biliary drainage to relieve symptoms and allow for palliative systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to establish the success, complication, and mortality rates of the initial biliary drainage in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at presentation. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent initial endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage between 2002 and 2014 were included. The success of drainage was defined as a successful biliary stent or drain placement, no unscheduled reintervention within 14 days, and serum bilirubin levels <50 μmol/L (ie, 2.9 mg/dL) or a >50% decrease in serum bilirubin after 14 days. Severe complications, and 90-day mortality were recorded. RESULTS Included were 186 patients: 161 (87%) underwent initial endoscopic biliary drainage and 25 (13%) underwent initial percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The success of initial drainage was observed in 73 patients (45%) after endoscopic biliary drainage and 6 (24%) after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The reasons for an unsuccessful initial drainage were: the failure to place a drain or stent in 39 patients (21%), an unplanned reintervention within 14 days in 52 patients (28%), and the bilirubin level >50 μmol/L (or not halved) after 14 days of initial drainage in 16 patients (9%). Severe drainage-related complications occurred in 19 patients (12%) after endoscopic biliary drainage and in 3 (12%) after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Overall, 66 patients (36%) died within 90 days after initial biliary drainage. CONCLUSION Initial biliary drainage in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma had a success rate of 45% and a 90-day mortality rate of 36%. Future studies for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma should focus on improving biliary drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marcia P Gaspersz
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen L A van Vugt
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J S Coelen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism Institute, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen de Jonge
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wojciech G Polak
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Chulja J Pek
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Moelker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - François E J A Willemssen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, the Netherlands
| | - L Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Büttner
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Newest Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma: An Updated Overview of Approved Treatments with Transplant Oncology Vision. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205074. [PMID: 36291857 PMCID: PMC9600404 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively rare but deadly disease with traditionally limited treatment options. The disease can be categorized by anatomic location within the biliary tree, with different associated risk factors and molecular profiles. Recent years have seen a burgeoning of targeted therapies that have enhanced survival in subsets of patients with certain mutations. We herein discuss these more recent advances as well as providing an overview of more well-known treatment modalities, with the goal of providing an accessible source for practicing clinicians. Abstract A minority of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) can be cured by surgical intervention (i.e., liver resection (LR) and liver transplantation (LT)). When modern criteria for LT are met, this intervention along with neoadjuvant treatments may achieve unprecedented survival in selected patients. Liver resection is associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 40 months, this number drastically decreases for unresectable advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), which is treated with systemic therapy. The first-line chemotherapy regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin is associated with a median overall survival of only 11.7 months. Since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s approval of the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 inhibitor ivosidenib in August 2021, there has been increasing interest in targeted therapy for CCA patients harboring mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2, neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK), B-raf kinase (BRAF), and HER2. At the same time, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors isalso being used in relapsed CCA. This review looks into the most recently completed and ongoing studies of targeted therapy as monotherapy or in combination with chemo- and/or immunotherapy. Whether it is resection, liver transplant, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or any combination of these treatment modalities, great strides are being made to improve outcomes for this challenging disease.
Collapse
|
42
|
Gilbert TM, Hackett J, Holt L, Bird N, Quinn M, Gordon-Weeks A, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Malik HZ, Jones RP. Long-term morbidity after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A cohort study. Surg Oncol 2022; 45:101875. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
43
|
Elshami M, Hue JJ, Ahmed FA, Kakish H, Hoehn RS, Rothermel LD, Hardacre JM, Ammori JB, Winter JM, Ocuin LM. Defining Facility Volume Threshold for Optimization of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Resection of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 27:730-740. [PMID: 36138311 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05465-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We determined the minimum threshold (Tmin) of annual facility case volume to optimize outcomes for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS We identified patients with localized perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent resection within the National Cancer Database (2010-2017). We used marginal structural logistic regression models to estimate the average treatment effect of receiving care in facilities meeting/exceeding Tmin on 90-day mortality and other postoperative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 2471 patients underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at 471 facilities. There was no effect of total hepatopancreatobiliary, surgical hepatopancreatobiliary, total hepatobiliary, surgical hepatobiliary, or total perihilar cholangiocarcinoma case volume on 90-day mortality. A Tmin of seven perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resections/year resulted in lower odds of 90-day mortality (IP-weighted OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.66-0.87). A total of two facilities met the Tmin. Patients receiving treatment at Tmin facilities had lower odds of length of stay ≥ 7 days (IP-weighted OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.97) and positive surgical resection margins (IP-weighted OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.47-0.55). Additionally, undergoing surgery at Tmin facilities resulted in higher (≥ 4 nodes) lymph node yields (IP-weighted OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.21-3.11) but no change in the odds of nodal positivity. There was no effect of undergoing surgery at Tmin facilities on 30-day mortality or re-admission. CONCLUSIONS Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is infrequently performed at a high number of facilities. A Tmin of ≥ 7 resections/year resulted in lower 90-day mortality and improved postoperative outcomes. Our data suggest that regionalization of care for patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma could potentially improve outcomes in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamedraed Elshami
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jonathan J Hue
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Fasih Ali Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Hanna Kakish
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Richard S Hoehn
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Luke D Rothermel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Hardacre
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - John B Ammori
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jordan M Winter
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Lee M Ocuin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Arfa S, Turco C, Lakkis Z, Bourgeois S, Fouet I, Evrard P, Sennegon E, Roucoux A, Paquette B, Devaux B, Rietsch-Koenig A, Heyd B, Doussot A. Delayed return of gastrointestinal function after hepatectomy in an ERAS program: incidence and risk factors. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1560-1568. [PMID: 35484074 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed return of gastrointestinal function (DGIF) after hepatectomy can involve increased morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Yet, data on incidence and risks factors are lacking. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy between June 2018 and December 2020 were included. All patients were included in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. DGIF was defined by the need for nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion after surgery. DGIF risk factors were identified. RESULTS Overall, 206 patients underwent hepatectomy. DGIF occurred in 41 patients (19.9%) after a median time of 2 days (range, 1-14). Among them, 6 patients (14.6%) developed aspiration pneumonia, of which one required ICU for mechanical ventilation. DGIF developed along with an intraabdominal complication in 7 patients (biliary fistula, n = 5; anastomotic fistula, n = 1; adhesive small bowel obstruction, n = 1). DGIF was associated with significantly increased severe morbidity rate (p = 0.001), prolonged time to normal food intake (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.001) and significantly decreased overall compliance rate (p = 0.001). Independent risk factors of DGIF were age (p < 0.001), vascular reconstruction (p = 0.007), anaesthetic induction using volatiles (p = 0.003) and epidural analgesia (p = 0.004). Using these 4 variables, a simple DGIF risk score has been developed allowing patient stratification in low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups. CONCLUSION DGIF after hepatectomy was frequently observed and significantly impacted postoperative outcomes. Identifying risk factors remains critical for preventing its occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Arfa
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Célia Turco
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Zaher Lakkis
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Sandrine Bourgeois
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Isabelle Fouet
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. CHU Besançon, France
| | - Philippe Evrard
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Elise Sennegon
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Alexandra Roucoux
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Brice Paquette
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Bénédicte Devaux
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. CHU Besançon, France
| | - Anne Rietsch-Koenig
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. CHU Besançon, France
| | - Bruno Heyd
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France
| | - Alexandre Doussot
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology -Liver Transplantation Unit, CHU Besançon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Maeda K, Kuriyama N, Ito T, Gyoten K, Hayasaki A, Fujii T, Iizawa Y, Murata Y, Tanemura A, Kishiwada M, Mizuno S. Safety and benefits of major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection in older perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:2861-2872. [PMID: 35996005 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02654-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and benefits of major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection in older perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients and to identify possible predictors of surgical mortality. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 102 consecutive patients who underwent major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in our institution between 2004 and 2021. The patients were included and divided into two groups: older patients ≥ 75 years and non-older patients < 75 years. Patient characteristics, preoperative nutritional and operative risk scores, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes, and long-term prognosis were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the predictors of 90-day mortality after major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection. RESULTS Significant differences were identified for some preoperative surgical risk scores, but not for nutritional scores. Older patients had a higher morbidity rate of respiratory complications (p = 0.016), but there were no significant differences in overall (p = 0.735) or disease-specific survival (p = 0.858). A high Dasari's score was identified as an independent predictive factor of 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection can be performed for optimally selected older and younger patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, resulting in a good prognosis. However, indications for extended surgery should be recognized. Dasari's preoperative risk score may be a good predictor of 90-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koki Maeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
- Regional Medical Support Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Naohisa Kuriyama
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan.
| | - Takahiro Ito
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Gyoten
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Aoi Hayasaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Takehiro Fujii
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iizawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Murata
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tanemura
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Masashi Kishiwada
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| | - Shugo Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu city, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Feng Q, Liao W, Li J, Zeng Y. The efficiency of postoperative liver failure and mortality risk scores after liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:643-644. [PMID: 36016736 PMCID: PMC9396093 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-22-228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Qingbo Feng
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenwei Liao
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiaxin Li
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| | - Yong Zeng
- Department of Liver Surgery & Liver Transplantation, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Lee TH, Moon JH, Stuart S. Role of ERCP in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:427-453. [PMID: 35691690 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHO), an aggressive perihilar biliary obstruction caused by cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or other metastatic malignancies, has a poor prognosis. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment method for biliary malignancies. However, most of the patients with MHO cannot undergo surgeries on presentation because of an advanced inoperable state or a poor performance state due to old age or comorbid diseases. Therefore, palliative biliary drainage is mandatory to improve symptomatic jaundice and quality of life. Among drainage methods, endoscopic biliary drainage is the current standard for the palliation of unresectable advanced MHO. The development of stents and various accessories and advances in endoscopic techniques including endoscopic ultrasonography have facilitated primary endoscopic intervention in difficult high-grade hilar strictures. However, some issues are still under debate, such as palliation methods, appropriate stents, the number of stents, deployment methods, and additional local ablation therapies. Therefore, this review presents currently optimal endoscopic palliation methods for advanced MHO based on the reported literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hoon Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University Cheonan Hospital, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, 31, Sooncheonhyang 6-gil, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 31151, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Ho Moon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University Bucheon Hospital, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, 170 Jomaru-Ro, Bucheon 14584, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sherman Stuart
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Health-University Hospital, 550 North University Boulevard, Suite 1634, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Noji T, Uemura S, Wiggers JK, Tanaka K, Nakanishi Y, Asano T, Nakamura T, Tsuchikawa T, Okamura K, Olthof PB, Jarnagin WR, van Gulik TM, Hirano S. Validation study of postoperative liver failure and mortality risk scores after liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2022; 11:375-385. [PMID: 35693403 PMCID: PMC9186189 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-20-660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) remains a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality. The Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam UMC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center proposed a postoperative mortality risk score (POMRS) and post-hepatectomy liver failure score (PHLFS) to predict patient outcomes. This study aimed to validate the POMRS and PHLFS for PHCC patients at Hokkaido University. METHODS Medical records of 260 consecutive PHCC patients who had undergone major hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection without pancreaticoduodenectomy at Hokkaido University between March 2001 and November 2018 were evaluated to validate the PHLFS and POMRS. RESULTS The observed risks for PHLF were 13.7%, 24.5%, and 39.8% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively, in the study cohort. A receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that the PHLFS had moderate predictive value, with an analysis under the curve (AUC) value of 0.62. Mortality rates based on the POMRS were 1.7%, 5%, and 5.1% for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively. The ROC analysis demonstrated an AUC value of 0.58. CONCLUSIONS This external validation study showed that for PHLFS the threshold for discrimination in an Eastern cohort was reached (AUC >0.6), but it would require optimization of the model before use in clinical practice is acceptable. The POMRS were not applicable in the eastern cohort. Further external validation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoko Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Jimme K. Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kimitaka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Nakanishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Toshimichi Asano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Toru Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuchikawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Okamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Pim B. Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ruzzenente A, Alaimo L, Caputo M, Conci S, Campagnaro T, De Bellis M, Bagante F, Pedrazzani C, Guglielmi A. Infectious complications after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single Western center experience. Surgery 2022; 172:813-820. [PMID: 35618490 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors for surgical infectious complications and the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma according to the microbiological examinations. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in the last decade were enrolled, and all clinical and microbiological data were collected from a retrospective monocentric database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed distinguishing patients who developed at least 1 surgical infectious complication (surgical site infections, acute bacterial cholangitis, bacteremia). RESULTS A total of 98 patients were included. Among patients who developed surgical infectious complications (51%), many preoperative characteristics were significantly more frequent: American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (P = .026), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.4 (P = .001), endoscopic sphincterotomy (P = .032), ≥2 biliary drainage procedures (P = .013), acute cholangitis (P = .012), multidrug resistant (P = .009), and ≥3 microorganisms' detection (P = .042); whereas during the postoperative period, surgical infectious complications were associated to increased incidence of intensive care unit readmission (P = .031), major complications (P < .001), posthepatectomy liver failure (P = .005), ascites (P = .008), biliary leakage (P = .008), 90-day readmission (P = .003), and prolonged length of hospital stay (P < .001). At the multivariate analysis 3 independent preoperative risk factors for surgical infectious complications were identified: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.4 (P = .004), endoscopic sphincterotomy (P = .009), and acute cholangitis (P = .013). The presence of multidrug-resistance in the perioperative biliary cultures was related to postoperative multidrug-resistant species from all cultures (P < .001) and organ/space and incisional-surgical site infections (P ≤ .044). CONCLUSION Infective complications after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma worsen the short-term outcomes. A careful microbiological surveillance should be carried out in all cases to prevent and promptly treat surgical infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy.
| | - Laura Alaimo
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Caputo
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Bellis
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Corrado Pedrazzani
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|