1
|
Bayoumi E, Lam PH, Enders R, Arundel C, Sheriff HM, Brar V, Jurgens CY, Deedwania P, Faselis C, Allman RM, Fonarow GC, Ahmed A. Beta-Blocker Use and Outcomes in Nursing Home Residents with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction. Am J Med 2022; 135:607-614. [PMID: 34861195 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beta-blockers improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Less is known about their role in older nursing home residents with HFrEF. METHODS From the combined OPTIMIZE-HF and Alabama Heart Failure Project data sets, we assembled a propensity score-matched balanced cohort of 6494 hospitalized patients ≥65 years with HFrEF (ejection fraction ≤40%). In our primary approach, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI)s for outcomes associated with discharge prescriptions for beta- blockers were estimated, examining for heterogeneity by admission from nursing homes. In our sensitivity approach, we examined these associations in a separately assembled propensity score-matched cohort of 122 patients admitted from nursing homes. RESULTS In the matched primary cohort of 6494 patients, HRs (95% CIs) for 12-month all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission were 0.80 (0.74-0.87) and 0.94 (0.86-1.02), respectively. Respective HRs (95% CIs) in the nursing home and non-nursing home subgroups were 0.77 (0.51-1.16) and 0.81 (0.74-0.87) for all-cause mortality (interaction P: 0.653) and 1.06 (0.53-2.12) and 0.89 (0.82-0.96) for heart failure readmission (interaction P: 0.753). In the matched sensitivity cohort of 122 patients admitted from nursing homes, HRs (95% CIs) for 12-month all-cause mortality and heart failure readmission were 0.86 (0.55-1.35) and 1.07 (0.52-2.22), respectively. Similar associations were observed for 30-day outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Beta-blocker use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality but not of heart failure readmission in older patients with HFrEF, which were similar for patients admitted and not admitted from nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Essraa Bayoumi
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Phillip H Lam
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | | | - Cherinne Arundel
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Helen M Sheriff
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Vijaywant Brar
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Corrine Y Jurgens
- Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA; Stony Brook University School of Nursing, Stony Brook, NY
| | | | - Charles Faselis
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC; Uniformed Services University, Washington, DC
| | - Richard M Allman
- George Washington University, Washington, DC; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | | | - Ali Ahmed
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC; Georgetown University, Washington, DC; George Washington University, Washington, DC.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arundel C, Sheriff HM, Lam PH, Mohammed SF, Jones LG, Jurgens CY, Morgan CJ, Faselis C, Allman RM, Fonarow GC, Ahmed A. Renin-Angiotensin Inhibition and Outcomes in Nursing Home Residents With Heart Failure. Am J Ther 2021; 27:e235-e242. [PMID: 30299270 PMCID: PMC10502912 DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000000836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs-ARBs) improve outcomes in heart failure (HF). Less is known about this association in nursing home (NH) residents. METHODS Of the 8024 hospitalized HF patients, 542 were NH residents, of whom 250 received ACEIs-ARBs. We assembled a propensity score-matched cohort of 157 pairs of NH residents receiving and not receiving ACEIs-ARBs balanced on 29 baseline characteristics (mean age, 83 years, 74% women, 17% African American), in which we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes associated with ACEI-ARB use. We then checked for interaction in a matched cohort of 5130 patients (378 were NH residents) assembled from the 8024 patients. RESULTS Among 314 matched NH residents, HRs (95% CIs) for 30-day all-cause readmission, HF readmission, and all-cause mortality were 0.78 (0.47-1.28), 0.68 (0.29-1.60), and 1.26 (0.70-2.27), respectively. Respective HRs (95% CIs) at 1 year were 0.76 (0.56-1.02), 0.68 (0.42-1.09), and 1.04 (0.78-1.38). Among 5130 matched patients, ACEI-ARB use was associated with a significantly lower risk of all outcomes at both times, with no significant interactions, except for 1-year mortality, which was only significant in the non-NH subgroup (P for interaction, 0.026). CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that the use of ACEIs or ARBs is associated with improved outcomes in patients with HF in the NH setting. However, we also found no evidence that this association is different in NH residents with HF versus non-NH patients with HF. Future larger studies are needed to demonstrate effectiveness of these drugs in the NH setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherinne Arundel
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Helen M. Sheriff
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Phillip H. Lam
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | | | - Linda G. Jones
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | - Charles Faselis
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Richard M. Allman
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC
| | | | - Ali Ahmed
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC
- George Washington University, Washington, DC
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arundel C, Lam PH, Faselis C, Sheriff HM, Dooley DJ, Morgan C, Fonarow GC, Aronow WS, Allman RM, Ahmed A. Length of stay and readmission in older adults hospitalized for heart failure. Arch Med Sci 2021; 17:891-899. [PMID: 34336017 PMCID: PMC8314416 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hospital length of stay (LoS) and hospital readmissions are metrics of healthcare performance. We examined the association between these two metrics in older patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure (HF). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eight thousand and forty-nine patients hospitalized for HF in 106 U.S. hospitals had a median LoS of 5 days; among them, 3777 had a LoS > 5 days. Using propensity scores for LoS > 5 days, we assembled 2723 pairs of patients with LoS 1-5 vs. > 5 days. The matched cohort of 5446 patients was balanced on 40 baseline characteristics. We repeated the above process in 7045 patients after excluding those with LoS > 10 days, thus assembling a second matched cohort of 2399 pairs of patients with LoS 1-5 vs. 6-10 days. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes associated with longer LoS were estimated in matched cohorts. RESULTS In the primary matched cohort (n = 5446), LoS > 5 days was associated with a higher risk of all-cause readmission at 30 days (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.04-1.31; p = 0.010), but not during longer follow-up. A longer LoS was also associated with a higher risk of mortality during 8.8 years of follow-up (HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06-1.21; p < 0.001). LoS had no association with HF readmission. Similar associations were observed among the matched sensitivity cohort (n = 4798) that excluded patients with LoS > 10 days. CONCLUSIONS In propensity score-matched balanced cohorts of patients with HF, a longer LoS was independently associated with poor outcomes, which persisted when LoS > 10 days were excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherinne Arundel
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Phillip H. Lam
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charles Faselis
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Helen M. Sheriff
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Daniel. J. Dooley
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charity Morgan
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Wilbert S. Aronow
- Weschester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Richard M. Allman
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Ali Ahmed
- Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang KN, Bell JS, Chen EYH, Gilmartin-Thomas JFM, Ilomäki J. Medications and Prescribing Patterns as Factors Associated with Hospitalizations from Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:423-457. [PMID: 29582403 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0537-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at high risk of hospitalization. Medications are a potentially modifiable risk factor for hospitalizations. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to systematically review the association between medications or prescribing patterns and hospitalizations from LTCFs. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) from inception to August 2017 for longitudinal studies reporting associations between medications or prescribing patterns and hospitalizations. Two independent investigators completed the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. RESULTS Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 22 cohort studies, five case-control studies, one case-time-control study and one case-crossover study, investigating 13 different medication classes and two prescribing patterns were included. An RCT demonstrated that high-dose influenza vaccination reduced all-cause hospitalization compared with standard-dose vaccination (risk ratio [RR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.98). Another RCT found no difference in hospitalization rates between oseltamivir as influenza treatment and oseltamivir as treatment plus prophylaxis (treatment = 4.7%, treatment and prophylaxis = 3.5%; p = 0.7). The third RCT found no difference between multivitamin/mineral supplementation and hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% CI 0.74-1.20) or emergency department visits (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.76-1.47). Two cohort studies demonstrated influenza vaccination reduced hospitalization. Four studies suggested polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) increased all-cause hospitalization. However, associations between polypharmacy (two studies), PIMs (one study) and fall-related hospitalizations were inconsistent. Inconsistent associations were found between psychotropic medications with all-cause and cause-specific hospitalizations (11 studies). Warfarin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pantoprazole and vinpocetine but not long-term acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), statins, trimetazidine, digoxin or β-blockers were associated with all-cause or cause-specific hospitalizations in single studies of specific resident populations. Most cohort studies assessed prevalent rather than incident medication exposure, and no studies considered time-varying medication use. CONCLUSION High-quality evidence suggests influenza vaccination reduces hospitalization. Polypharmacy and PIMs are consistently associated with increased all-cause hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate N Wang
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville Campus, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
| | - J Simon Bell
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville Campus, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Hornsby, NSW, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Esa Y H Chen
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville Campus, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital, Hornsby, NSW, Australia
| | - Julia F M Gilmartin-Thomas
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Jenni Ilomäki
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville Campus, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heart Rate and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70:1861-1871. [PMID: 28982499 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A lower heart rate is associated with better outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF). Less is known about this association in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to examine associations of discharge heart rate with outcomes in hospitalized patients with HFpEF. METHODS Of the 8,873 hospitalized patients with HFpEF (EF ≥50%) in the Medicare-linked OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) registry, 6,286 had a stable heart rate, defined as ≤20 beats/min variation between admission and discharge. Of these, 2,369 (38%) had a discharge heart rate of <70 beats/min. Propensity scores for discharge heart rate <70 beats/min, estimated for each of the 6,286 patients, were used to assemble a cohort of 2,031 pairs of patients with heart rate <70 versus ≥70 beats/min, balanced on 58 baseline characteristics. RESULTS The 4,062 matched patients had a mean age of 79 ± 10 years, 66% were women, and 10% were African American. During 6 years (median 2.8 years) of follow-up, all-cause mortality was 65% versus 70% for matched patients with a discharge heart rate <70 versus ≥70 beats/min, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80 to 0.93; p < 0.001). A heart rate <70 beats/min was also associated with a lower risk for the combined endpoint of HF readmission or all-cause mortality (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.96; p = 0.002), but not with HF readmission (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.01) or all-cause readmission (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.08). Similar associations were observed regardless of heart rhythm or receipt of beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS Among hospitalized patients with HFpEF, a lower discharge heart rate was independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, but not readmission.
Collapse
|