1
|
Guépin C, Duhem S, Gaud N, Warembourg F, Vaiva G, Leroy A. Adjunct psychomotor trauma exposure in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a case series. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2025; 16:2480889. [PMID: 40183188 PMCID: PMC11980199 DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2480889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2024] [Revised: 03/07/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Psychotraumatic disorders, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), have been a major public health issue for many years. However, many patients remain resistant to treatment, with significant levels of residual symptoms, a high dropout rate, and poor functional prognosis despite a reduction in psychotraumatic symptoms. The physical impact of trauma might influence treatment response. We have developed an integrative method for patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In this study, we report the cases of 16 successive patients with PTSD treated with adjunct psychomotor trauma exposure.Methods: The data were collected retrospectively from the clinical records of subjects treated with adjunct psychomotor exposure therapy at the Hauts-de-France Regional Center for Psychotrauma. Severity of psychotrauma was reported using PCL-5 before and one month after treatment.Results: A decrease in PCL-5 score was seen in all participants between baseline (45.6 ± 11.6) at the end of treatment (16.6 ± 10.1) (p < .001).Conclusion: Adjunct psychomotor exposure therapy is a promising tool for the treatment of PTSD. Future high-quality randomised controlled trials are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Guépin
- CHU de Lille, General Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
| | - Stéphane Duhem
- CHU de Lille, General Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
| | - Nicolas Gaud
- CHU de Lille, Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
| | - Frédérique Warembourg
- CHU de Lille, General Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
| | - Guillaume Vaiva
- CHU de Lille, General Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
- Univ Lille, INSERM, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre (U-1172), Lille, France
- Centre National de Ressources et de Résilience pour les psychotraumatismes (CN2R Lille– Paris), Lille, France
| | - Arnaud Leroy
- CHU de Lille, General Psychiatry Department, Regional center for Psychotraumatism Hauts-de-France, Lille, France
- Univ Lille, INSERM, Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Centre (U-1172), Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Galovski TE, Nixon RDV, Kehle-Forbes S. Walking the line between fidelity and flexibility: A conceptual review of personalized approaches to manualized treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress 2024; 37:768-774. [PMID: 38954530 DOI: 10.1002/jts.23073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
The heterogeneity of the core symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), high rates of comorbid mental and physical health conditions, and substantial impact of the disorder on functioning and well-being contribute to complex clinical presentations that can be challenging to treat. Despite these challenges, there are excellent manualized treatments for PTSD with significant empirical support. Although the success of frontline treatments for PTSD is evident, there remains room for improvement as indicated by suboptimal response and attrition rates. To address challenges to optimal therapy outcomes (COTOs), researchers have conducted numerous clinical trials designed to (a) enhance the core structure of treatment protocols to increase flexibility or (b) expand the protocols to address comorbid conditions that inhibit recovery. However, it is implausible to ever conduct the number of enhancement and expansion clinical trials necessary to test manual modifications for the universe of possible COTOs. This conceptual review describes the concept of a personalized model of therapy that leverages a case formulation approach to implementing an evidence-based treatment for PTSD. This personalized approach provides guidance for the clinician in assessing the patient's COTOs, monitoring them throughout treatment, and relying on the patient's idiosyncratic data to inform treatment decisions, including how and when to diverge from treatment when clinically indicated and ensuring a clear path to return to trauma-focused work when the COTO is stabilized. This personalized, case formulation approach to treating PTSD provides guidance for adopting a more flexible approach to treating clinically complex patients while ensuring fidelity to the protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara E Galovski
- National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Reginald D V Nixon
- College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Flinders University Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shannon Kehle-Forbes
- National Center for PTSD, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, VA Minneapolis Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu H, Wang X, Gong T, Xu S, Zhang J, Yan L, Zeng Y, Yi M, Qian Y. Neuromodulation treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability, and follow-up effects. J Anxiety Disord 2024; 106:102912. [PMID: 39094317 DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Neuromodulation treatments are novel interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but their comparative effects at treatment endpoint and follow-up and the influence of moderators remain unclear. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that explored neuromodulation, both as monotherapy and in combination, for treating patients with PTSD. 21 RCTs with 981 PTSD patients were included. The neuromodulation treatment was classified into nine protocols, including subtypes of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS). This Bayesian network meta-analysis demonstrated that (1) dual-tDCS (SMD = -1.30), high-frequency repetitive TMS (HF-rTMS) (SMD = -0.97), intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) (SMD = -0.93), and low-frequency repetitive TMS (LF-rTMS) (SMD = -0.76) were associated with significant reductions in PTSD symptoms at the treatment endpoint, but these effects were not significant at follow-up; (2) no difference was found between any active treatment with sham controls; (3) regarding co-morbid additions, synchronized TMS (sTMS) was significantly associated with reductions of depression symptoms at treatment endpoint (SMD = -1.80) and dual-tDCS was associated with reductions in anxiety symptoms at follow-up (SMD = -1.70). Findings suggested dual-tDCS, HF-rTMS, iTBS, and LF-rTMS were effective for reducing PTSD symptoms, while their sustained efficacy was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoning Liu
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), 51 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, PR China
| | - Xinyi Wang
- Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China
| | - Tingting Gong
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China; Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education / National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China
| | - Shi Xu
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China; Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education / National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China
| | - Jiachen Zhang
- Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China
| | - Li Yan
- Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China
| | - Yuyi Zeng
- Peking University Health Science Center, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, PR China
| | - Ming Yi
- Neuroscience Research Institute and Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China; Key Laboratory for Neuroscience, Ministry of Education / National Health Commission, Peking University, Beijing 100083, PR China
| | - Ying Qian
- Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), 51 Huayuan North Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100871, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Semmlinger V, Leithner C, Klöck LM, Ranftl L, Ehring T, Schreckenbach M. Prevalence and Predictors of Nonresponse to Psychological Treatment for PTSD: A Meta-Analysis. Depress Anxiety 2024; 2024:9899034. [PMID: 40226730 PMCID: PMC11918500 DOI: 10.1155/2024/9899034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Although highly efficacious psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exist, there is evidence that first-line psychological treatment approaches leave a substantial subgroup of patients still suffering from clinically relevant PTSD symptoms posttreatment. Aims We aimed to meta-analytically establish the prevalence and predictors of nonresponse to first-line guideline-recommended psychological treatments for PTSD. Materials and Methods This meta-analysis was preregistered (CRD42023368766). We searched the PTSD Trials Standardized Data Repository, Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, and PTSDpubs. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT), reporting data on nonresponse operationalized by (lack of) symptom reduction in PTSD symptoms at posttreatment of first-line guideline-recommended PTSD treatments for adult patients meeting criteria for a PTSD diagnosis. All studies published by October 10, 2023, were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. We estimated the pooled average nonresponse rates and ORs. Subgroup and metaregression analyses targeting the nonresponse rates served to identify significant predictors. All analyses were conducted using three-level multilevel models. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2 tool. Results Eighty six studies with 117 active treatment conditions and 7,894 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted average nonresponse rate was 39.23%, 95% CI (35.08%, 43.53%). Nonresponse was less frequent in the treatment condition compared to the control condition (OR = 0.22). Subgroup analyses and metaregression revealed the type of analysis, population, type of intervention, treatment format, year of publication, age, sex, PTSD symptom severity, comorbid depression, and baseline depression score as significant predictors. The heterogeneity between studies was substantial to considerable (I 2 = 83.12%). Half of the studies had a high risk of bias. Conclusions This meta-analysis found that a substantial subgroup of patients suffering from PTSD still showed clinically significant symptoms after having received treatment. Treatment modifications should be considered for specific subgroups of PTSD patients based on predictors found to be associated with nonresponse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Semmlinger
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
| | - Cosima Leithner
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
| | - Lea Maria Klöck
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
| | - Lena Ranftl
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
| | - Thomas Ehring
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Munich 80802, Germany
| | - Monika Schreckenbach
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich 80802, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang L, Wu Y, Jing S, Liu X, Ren T, Liu X, Dai Z, Fu J, Chen X, Xiao W, Huang Y, Wang H, Wang W, Gu X, Ma L, Zhang S, Yu Y, Li L, Su X, Qiao Y. The second dose of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy among health care workers in China: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Am J Infect Control 2024; 52:525-532. [PMID: 38007100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 outbreak in China exposed health care workers (HCWs) to an increased risk of infection. The acquired immunity rapidly diminishes after the previous COVID-19 vaccination and the second booster vaccination has been recommended in several countries. HCWs are a priority group for vaccination because they are at increased risk of being infected, however, a certain amount of HCWs were hesitant. METHODS The survey was conducted among 5805 HCWs in China from January 5 to February 9, 2023. Questionnaire included sociodemographic information, COVID-19-related variables, psychological factors, and the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influencing factors of the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. RESULTS 42.2% of HCWs self-reported having the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy. Occupations, years of working, COVID-19 infection status were associated with less vaccine hesitancy. HCWs who had received 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were less likely to be hesitant compared to those had not received. HCWs with PTSD symptoms and anxiety symptoms were more likely to be hesitant. No relation was observed between COVID-19 vaccine booster hesitancy and age, marriage, salary, and perceived an increased risk of COVID-19 infection due to work (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A considerable proportion of HCWs were hesitant to accept the second dose of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. Incorporating vaccine knowledge and new evidence into routine health educations and procedures to raise confidence and reduce complacency may be effective and feasible in promoting the vaccination and implementing future vaccination programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Zhang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yijin Wu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shu Jing
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Liu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tianrui Ren
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyang Liu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenwei Dai
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiaqi Fu
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Chen
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weijun Xiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiman Huang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Wang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Wang
- School of Nursing, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaofen Gu
- Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Li Ma
- Public Health School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shaokai Zhang
- Henan Cancer Hospital, Affiliate Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yanqin Yu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Clinical Research, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoyou Su
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Youlin Qiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li D, Luo J, Yan X, Liang Y. Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) as an Independent Diagnosis: Differences in Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being between CPTSD and PTSD. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11081188. [PMID: 37108021 PMCID: PMC10137946 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11081188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Although many studies have differentiated complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), few studies have explored the differences in positive adaptation between the two. The present study aimed to determine whether there are distinctions between PTSD and CPTSD in hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The present study used a Chinese young adult sample with childhood adversity experiences (n = 1451), including 508 males and 943 females, with an average age of 20.07 years (SD = 1.39). PTSD and CPTSD symptoms were measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. Eudaimonic well-being was measured by the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, and hedonic well-being, including life satisfaction and happiness, was assessed by the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the face scale. Analysis of variance showed that the CPTSD group had lower hedonic and eudaimonic well-being than the PTSD group. Moreover, hierarchical regression analysis showed that disturbances in self-organization (DSO) symptoms in CPTSD were negatively associated with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, while PTSD was positively associated with eudaimonic well-being. These findings indicate that the core symptoms of CPTSD might hinder individuals from living fulfilling lives. The positive association between eudaimonic well-being and PTSD symptoms may be a manifestation of posttraumatic growth. Based on the perspective of positive adaptation, these results provide new evidence of the importance of considering CPTSD as an independent diagnosis and suggest that future well-being interventions should be implemented in people with DSO symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danfeng Li
- School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Jiaxian Luo
- School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Xingru Yan
- School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Yiming Liang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Affiliated Mental Health Center (ECNU), School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Swerdlow BA, Baker SN, Leifker FR, Straud CL, Rozek DC, Sippel LM. The impact of trauma-focused psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder on interpersonal functioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Trauma Stress 2023. [PMID: 36628929 DOI: 10.1002/jts.22906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Interpersonal functioning is a common concern for people with postttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but is not a key target of most trauma-focused psychotherapies (TFPs). We preregistered and undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of TFPs for improving interpersonal functioning. Studies were identified through the PTSD Trials Standardized Data Repository, scholarly databases, and the solicitation of unpublished data from the PTSD research community following current PRISMA guidelines. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate within-group change (i.e., pre- to posttreatment) in interpersonal functioning. Meta-analytic findings yielded a medium total effect of TFP on interpersonal functioning, g = 0.54, 95% CI [0.37, 0.72], with high between-study heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses yielded substantively equivalent point estimates when outliers were excluded, g = 0.55, and when only the most well-established individual TFPs were included, g = 0.57. In contrast, allocation to a control condition was associated with little average change in interpersonal functioning, g = 0.04 [-0.12, 0.21]. Formal tests did not yield clear evidence of publication bias. Bias-corrected estimates varied but centered around a medium effect, gs = 0.41-1.11. There was a medium-to-large association between change in interpersonal functioning and change in PTSD symptoms, rs = -.35--.44. The extant literature on TFPs and interpersonal functioning is small and heterogeneous, indicating the need for more focused attention on this outcome. Results suggest that, on average, TFPs are moderately efficacious for improving interpersonal functioning; however, additional treatment may be needed to meet the desired level of improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shelby N Baker
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Feea R Leifker
- Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Casey L Straud
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,South Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - David C Rozek
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Lauren M Sippel
- Department of Veterans Affairs Northeast Program Evaluation Center, West Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.,Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for PTSD, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joseph AP, Wallman M, Scott E, Ilchef R, Harris N, Jackson A, Bryant RA. A proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of follow-up mental health care for traumatic injury patients following hospital discharge. Injury 2023; 54:1362-1368. [PMID: 36858896 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traumatic injuries account for a huge burden of disease. Many patients develop persistent mental health problems in the months following hospital discharge. This proof-of-concept trial investigated whether Stepped Care comprising follow-up assessment telephone calls and appropriate referral information would lead to better mental health and functioning in traumatic injury patients. METHODS Patients admitted to the Trauma Service at Royal North Shore Hospital were randomized to either Stepped Care (n = 84) or Treatment as Usual (n = 90). All patients were assessed for anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress prior to hospital discharge. Those in Stepped Care received a telephone call at 1-month and 3-months after hospital discharge in which they were administered a brief assessment; patients who reported mental health or pain difficulties were provided with information for local specialists to address their specific problem. All patients were independently assessed by telephone interview 9- months after hospital discharge for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (primary outcome), as well as for anxiety, depression, disability, and pain. RESULTS There were 58 (73%) patients that could be contacted at either the 1-month or 3-month assessments. Of those contacted, 28 patients (48% of those contacted) were referred for specialist assistance. There were no differences between treatment arms on PTSD symptoms at follow-up [F1,95 = 0.55, p = 0.46]. At the 9-month assessment, patients in the Stepped Care condition reported significantly less anxiety [F1,95 = 5.07, p = 0.03] and disability [F1,95 = 4.37, p = 0.04] relative to those in Treatment as Usual. At 9 months there was no difference between conditions on depression [F1,95 = 1.03, p = 0.31]. There were no differences between conditions on self-reported pain difficulties. CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept trial suggests that brief screening assessments of traumatic injury patients following hospital discharge, combined with appropriate referral information, may lead to better functional outcomes. Further research is needed with larger sample sizes and greater verification of referral uptake to validate this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Joseph
- Trauma Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - Matthew Wallman
- Trauma Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Elliot Scott
- Trauma Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Ralf Ilchef
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065
| | - Newman Harris
- Department of Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065
| | - Alicia Jackson
- Trauma Service, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Richard A Bryant
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perrotte JK, Weston R, Meyer EC, DeBeer BB, Kimbrel NA, Gulliver SB, Morissette SB. A brief report on the temporal relations between social functioning and behavioral health among veterans. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2023; 58:177-181. [PMID: 36114856 PMCID: PMC9852037 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02364-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Using a four-wave longitudinal design, three competing hypotheses (i.e., social selection, social causation, and reciprocal causation) were tested pertaining to the relation between social functioning and several indices of behavioral health [i.e., post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), distress, and alcohol-related problems] among military veterans exposed to trauma. Across two latent growth curve analyses, data largely supported longitudinal links between improved social functioning and positive behavioral health, often indicating that the improvements in social functioning frequently precede improvements in behavioral health. Overall, findings underscore the merit of directly targeting social functioning as part of mental health treatment among trauma-exposed individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca Weston
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Eric C Meyer
- Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Waco, TX, USA
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Bryann B DeBeer
- Department of Veterans Affairs VISN 17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Texas Veterans Healthcare System, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Nathan A Kimbrel
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Suzy B Gulliver
- Warriors Research Institute at Baylor Scott & White Health and Texas, A&M University Health Science Center, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Sandra B Morissette
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|