Antigen-driven autoantibody production in lungs of interstitial lung disease with autoimmune disease

Rheumatoid Arthritis-Specific Autoimmunity in the Lung Before and at the Onset of Disease

OBJECTIVE

The lung is implicated as a site for breach of tolerance prior to onset of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To substantiate this, we investigated lung-resident B cells in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples from untreated early RA patients and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive individuals at risk for developing RA.

METHODS

Single B cells (n = 7,680) were phenotyped and isolated from BAL samples from individuals at risk of RA (n = 3) and at RA diagnosis (n = 9). The immunoglobulin variable region transcripts were sequenced and selected for expression as monoclonal antibodies (n = 141). Monoclonal ACPAs were tested for reactivity patterns and binding to neutrophils.

RESULTS

Using our single-cell approach, we found significantly increased proportions of B lymphocytes in ACPA+ compared to ACPA- individuals. Memory and double-negative B cells were prominent in all subgroups. Upon antibody re-expression, 7 highly mutated citrulline-autoreactive clones originating from different memory B cell subsets were identified, both in individuals at risk of RA and early RA patients. Lung IgG variable gene transcripts from ACPA+ individuals carried frequent mutation-induced N-linked Fab glycosylation sites (P < 0.001), often in the framework 3 of the variable region. Two of the lung ACPAs bound to activated neutrophils, 1 from an individual at risk of RA and 1 from an early RA patient.

CONCLUSION

T cell-driven B cell differentiation resulting in local class switching and somatic hypermutation are evident in lungs before as well as in early stages of ACPA+ RA. Our findings add to the notion of lung mucosa being a site for initiation of citrulline autoimmunity preceding seropositive RA.

Potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies with therapeutic effects in two animal models

The use of therapeutic neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection has been highly effective. However, there remain few practical antibodies against viruses that are acquiring mutations. In this study, we created 494 monoclonal antibodies from patients with COVID-19-convalescent, and identified antibodies that exhibited the comparable neutralizing ability to clinically used antibodies in the neutralization assay using pseudovirus and authentic virus including variants of concerns. These antibodies have different profiles against various mutations, which were confirmed by cell-based assay and cryo-electron microscopy. To prevent antibody-dependent enhancement, N297A modification was introduced. Our antibodies showed a reduction of lung viral RNAs by therapeutic administration in a hamster model. In addition, an antibody cocktail consisting of three antibodies was also administered therapeutically to a macaque model, which resulted in reduced viral titers of swabs and lungs and reduced lung tissue damage scores. These results showed that our antibodies have sufficient antiviral activity as therapeutic candidates.

Bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy in connective tissue diseases, to do or not to do?

Bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy (LBx) are helpful in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD) and interstitial lung diseases (ILD) regardless of cause, including infectious, noninfectious, immunologic, or malignant. The decision whether to perform only bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and eventually a subsequent LBx in case of a nondiagnostic lavage, or one single bronchoscopy combining both sampling methods depends on the clinical suspicion, on patient’s characteristics (e.g. increased biopsy risk) and preferences, and on the resources and biopsy techniques available locally (e.g. regular forceps versus cryobiopsy). In CTD-ILD, BAL has major clinical utility in excluding infections and in the diagnosis of specific patterns of acute lung damage (e.g. alveolar hemorrhage, diffuse alveolar damage, and organizing pneumonia). LBx is indicated to exclude neoplasm or diagnose lymphoproliferative lung disorders that in CTD patients are more common than in the general population. Defining BAL cellularity and characterizing the CTD-ILD histopathologic pattern by LBx can be helpful in the differential diagnosis of cases without established CTD [e.g. ILD preceding full-blown CTD, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF)], but the prognostic and theragnostic role of those findings remains unclear. Few studies in the pretranscriptomics era have investigated the diagnostic and prognostic role of BAL and LBx in CTD-ILD, and it is reasonable to hypothesize that future studies conducted applying innovative techniques on BAL and LBx might open new and unexpected avenues in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment approach to CTD-ILD. This is particularly desirable now that a new drug treatment era is emerging, in which we have more than one therapeutic choice (immunosuppressive agents, antifibrotic drugs, and biological agents). We hope that future research will pave the path toward precision medicine providing data for a more accurate ILD-CTD endotyping that will guide the physicians through targeted therapeutic choices, rather than to the approximative approach ‘one drug fits them all’.