Extending the center of pressure to incorporate handhold forces: Derivation and sample application

Postural Stability When Grasping an Object While Standing: Younger and Older Adults (Fallers and Non-Fallers)

We investigated postural stability through the margin of stability (MoS) while reaching and grasping an object with increasing difficulty levels in younger, fallers and non-fallers. Forty-five individuals distributed into three groups participated in this study: younger adults (YA), non-fallers (OA), and fallers (FOA). They stood upright and reached and grasped a dowel. Six conditions combining the stability of the dowel's base and obstacles close to the dowel were manipulated to characterize different difficulty levels. We computed the MoS in both anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions in the interval between reaching onset and dowel contact. From the MoS time series, we analyzed the minimum and maximum, including the time of occurrence of these events. The MoS was smaller for OA than for YA in both directions. In the ML direction, the minimum MoS was smaller for FOA than for YA. The minimum MoS took place earlier for FOA than YA in the AP direction. FOA and OA exhibited similar behavior with reduced MoS, suggesting impaired postural control during reaching-to-grasping in a standing posture. FOA used a more cautious strategy by reverting the MoS earlier than YA, allowing them to increase their MoS before YA when preparing to grasp the dowel.

Correlations between reach, lean and ladder tipping risk

Overreaching is a common cause of ladder falls, which occur frequently among older adults in the domestic setting. Reaching and body leaning during ladder use likely influence the climber-ladder combined center of mass and subsequently center of pressure (COP) position (location of the resultant force acting at the base of the ladder). The relationship between these variables has not been quantified, but is warranted to assess ladder tipping risk due to overreaching (i.e. COP traveling outside the ladder's base of support). This study investigated the relationships between participant maximum reach (hand position), trunk lean, and COP during ladder use to improve assessment of ladder tipping risk. Older adults (n = 104) were asked to perform a simulated roof gutter clearing task while standing on a straight ladder. Each participant reached laterally to clear tennis balls from a gutter. Maximum reach, trunk lean, and COP were captured during the clearing attempt. COPwas positively correlated withmaximum reach(p < 0.001; r = 0.74) and trunk lean (p < 0.001; r = 0.85). Maximum reach was positively correlated with trunk lean (p < 0.001; r = 0.89). The relationship between trunk lean and COP was stronger than that between maximum reach and COP, denoting the importance of body positioning on ladder tipping risk. For this experimental setup, regression estimates indicate reaching and lean distance of 113 cm and 29 cm from the ladder midline, respectively, would lead to ladder tipping on average. These findings assist with developing thresholds of unsafe reaching and leaning on a ladder, which can aid in reducing ladder falls.

The timing and amplitude of the muscular activity of the arms preceding impact in a forward fall is modulated with fall velocity

Protective arm reactions have been shown to be an important injury avoidance mechanism in unavoidable falls. Protective arm reactions have been shown to be modulated with fall height, however it is not clear if they are modulated with impact velocity. The aim of this study was to determine if protective arm reactions are modulated in response to a forward fall with an initially unpredictable impact velocity. Forward falls were evoked via sudden release of a standing pendulum support frame with adjustable counterweight to control fall acceleration and impact velocity. Thirteen younger adults (1 female) participated in this study. Counterweight load explained more than 89% of the variation of impact velocity. Angular velocity at impact decreased (p < 0.001), drop duration increased from 601 ms to 816 ms (p < 0.001), and the maximum vertical ground reaction force decreased from 64%BW to 46%BW (p < 0.001) between the small and large counterweight. Elbow angle at impact (129 degrees extension), triceps (119 ms) and biceps (98 ms) pre-impact time, and co-activation (57%) were not significantly affected by counterweight load (p-values > 0.08). Average triceps and biceps EMG amplitude decreased from 0.26 V/V to 0.19 V/V (p = 0.004) and 0.24 V/V to 0.11 V/V (p = 0.002) with increasing counterweight respectively. Protective arm reactions were modulated with fall velocity by reducing EMG amplitude with decreasing impact velocity. This demonstrates a neuromotor control strategy for managing evolving fall conditions. Future work is needed to further understand how the CNS deals with additional unpredictability (e.g., fall direction, perturbation magnitude, etc.) when deploying protective arm reactions.

Effect of Handrail Height and Age on Trunk and Shoulder Kinematics Following Perturbation-Evoked Grasping Reactions During Gait

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the effect of handrail height and age on trunk and shoulder kinematics, and concomitant handrail forces, on balance recovery reactions during gait.

BACKGROUND

Falls are the leading cause of unintentional injury in adults in North America. Handrails can significantly enhance balance recovery and help individuals to avoid falls, provided that their design allows users across the lifespan to reach and grasp the rail after balance loss, and control their trunk by applying hand-contact forces to the rail. However, the effect of handrail height and age on trunk and shoulder kinematics when recovering from perturbations during gait is unknown.

METHOD

Fourteen younger and 13 older adults experienced balance loss (sudden platform translations) while walking beside a height-adjustable handrail. Handrail height was varied from 30 to 44 inches (76 to 112 cm). Trunk and shoulder kinematics were measured via 3D motion capture; applied handrail forces were collected from load cells mounted to the rail.

RESULTS

As handrail height increased (up to 42 inches/107 cm), peak trunk angular displacement and velocity generally decreased, while shoulder elevation angles during reaching and peak handrail forces did not differ significantly between 36 and 42 inches (91 and 107 cm). Age was associated with reduced peak trunk angular displacements, but did not affect applied handrail forces.

CONCLUSION

Higher handrails (up to 42 inches) may be advantageous for trunk control when recovering from destabilizations during gait.

APPLICATION

Our results can inform building codes, workplace safety standards, and accessibility standards, for safer handrail design.

Review of the Upright Balance Assessment Based on the Force Plate

Quantitative assessment is crucial for the evaluation of human postural balance. The force plate system is the key quantitative balance assessment method. The purpose of this study is to review the important concepts in balance assessment and analyze the experimental conditions, parameter variables, and application scope based on force plate technology. As there is a wide range of balance assessment tests and a variety of commercial force plate systems to choose from, there is room for further improvement of the test details and evaluation variables of the balance assessment. The recommendations presented in this article are the foundation and key part of the postural balance assessment; these recommendations focus on the type of force plate, the subject's foot posture, and the choice of assessment variables, which further enriches the content of posturography. In order to promote a more reasonable balance assessment method based on force plates, further methodological research and a stronger consensus are still needed.

Untangling biomechanical differences in perturbation-induced stepping strategies for lateral balance stability in older individuals

When recovering balance from a lateral perturbation, younger adults tend to stabilize balance with a single lateral sidestep while older adults often take multistep responses. Using multiple steps to recover balance is consistently associated with increased fall risk, altered body center of mass (CoM) control and instability. The aim of this study was to compare the spatio-temporal stepping characteristics and the margin of stability (MoS) of single lateral sidesteps (LSS1) with the first and second steps of a two-step protective step sequence. Two-step sequences begin with either a cross-over step to the front or back, or a medial step followed by a lateral sidestep. Seventy-one older adults received random lateral waist-pull perturbations to either side. We hypothesized that LSS1 would be more stable (larger MoS) than either step in a two-step sequence. With some exceptions, utilizing a two-step sequence was associated with a reduced CoM velocity and distance between the base of support and CoM and decreased stability in the frontal plane following limb loading of the first and second step. There were no differences in the time available to arrest the extrapolated CoM at the end of a single lateral sidestep or the final step of a two-step sequence. Two-step sequences involving a cross-over step include more complex stepping trajectories and also challeng stability in the sagittal plane requiring a multidimensional balance correction. These results indicate important step type differences in center of mass control in recovering balance with a single lateral sidestep as opposed to a two-step sequence among older adults.