Lower limb muscular activity during walking at different speeds: Over-ground versus treadmill walking: A voluntary response evaluation

Treadmill induced belt-accelerations may not accurately evoke the muscle responses to obstacle trips in older people

BACKGROUND

Treadmill belt-accelerations are a commonly utilised surrogate for tripping, but their physiological validity is unknown. This study examined if a treadmill belt-acceleration induces lower limb muscle activation responses similar to a trip on a walkway.

METHODS

38 older people (65+ years) experienced one treadmill belt-acceleration and one walkway obstacle trip in random order. Muscle responses were assessed bilaterally using surface electromyography on the rectus femoris (RF), tibialis anterior (TA), semitendinosus (ST) and gastrocnemius medial head (GM). Unperturbed muscle activity, post-perturbation onset latency, peak magnitude, time to peak and co-contraction index (CCI) were examined.

RESULTS

Muscle activity in the right ST was greater during unperturbed walking on the treadmill compared to walkway (P=0.011). Compared to a treadmill belt-acceleration, a walkway trip elicited faster onset latencies in all muscles; greater peak magnitudes in the left RF, TA, GM and right GM; faster time to peaks in the left TA and right GM; and lower knee and ankle muscle CCI (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Walkway trips and treadmill belt-accelerations elicit distinct muscle activation patterns. While walkway trips induced faster and larger muscle responses, treadmill belt-accelerations involved greater co-contraction. Therefore, treadmill belt-accelerations may not accurately simulate the muscle responses to trips.

Commingling Effects of Anterior Load and Walking Surface on Dynamic Gait Stability in Young Adults

Treadmill walking has been used as a surrogate for overground walking to examine how load carriage affects gait. The validity of using treadmill walking to investigate load carriage's effects on stability has not been established. Thirty young adults were randomized into 3 front-loaded groups (group 1: 0%, 2: 10%, or 3: 20% of bodyweight). Participants carried their load during overground and treadmill walking. Dynamic gait stability (primary outcome) was determined for 2 gait events (touchdown and liftoff). Secondary variables included step length, gait speed, and trunk angle. Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated similar stability between walking surfaces. Group 3 was less stable during treadmill walking than overground (P ≤ .005). Besides trunk angle, all secondary outcomes were similar between groups (P > .272) but different between surfaces (P ≤ .001). The trunk angle at both events showed significant group- and surface-related differences (P ≤ .046). Results suggested that walking with an anterior load of up to 10% bodyweight causes comparable stability between surfaces. A 20% bodyweight front load could render participants less stable on the treadmill than overground. This indicates that anteriorly loaded treadmill walking may not be interchangeable with overground walking concerning stability for anterior loads of 20% bodyweight.

Physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical differences between treadmill and overground walking in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare physiological, perceptual and biomechanical outcomes between walking on a treadmill and overground surfaces. Five databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were searched until September 2022. Included studies needed to be a crossover design comparing biomechanical, physiological, or perceptual measures between motorised-treadmill and overground walking in healthy adults (18-65 years) walking at the same speed (<5% difference). The quality of studies were assessed using a modified Downs and Black Quality Index. Meta-analyses were performed to determine standardised mean difference ± 95% confidence intervals for all main outcome measures. Fifty-five studies were included with 1,005 participants. Relative oxygen consumption (standardised mean difference [95% confidence interval] 0.38 [0.14,0.63]) and cadence (0.22 [0.06,0.38]) are higher during treadmill walking. Whereas stride length (-0.36 [-0.62,-0.11]) and step length (-0.52 [-0.98,-0.06]) are lower during treadmill walking. Most kinetic variables are different between surfaces. The oxygen consumption, spatiotemporal and kinetic differences on the treadmill may be an attempt to increase stability due to the lack of control, discomfort and familiarity on the treadmill. Treadmill construction including surface stiffness and motor power are likely additional constraints that need to be considered and require investigation. This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarship. Protocol registration is CRD42020208002 (PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) in October 2020.

Effect of load carriage on joint kinematics, vertical ground reaction force and muscle activity: Treadmill versus overground walking

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have investigated the effect of either different load or different surface conditions, such as overground or treadmill walking, on human biomechanics. However, studies combining these two aspects are scarce.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The purpose of this study was to quantify the difference in spatiotemporal parameters, lower extremity joint kinematics, vertical ground reaction forces (vGRF) and muscle activity between normal bodyweight (100 %BW) and 20 % increased bodyweight (120 %BW) during overground and treadmill walking.

METHODS

Ten healthy young adults walked overground at self-selected speed and on an instrumented treadmill set to the overground speed. Spatiotemporal parameters, 3-dimensional lower extremity kinematics, vGRF and muscle activity were measured and compared between conditions.

RESULTS

The stance phase was longer for 120 %BW than 100 %BW in both overground and treadmill walking. Further, the stance phase was longer and cadence higher in treadmill than overground walking for both load conditions. Knee flexion angles were more than 3° greater in the second half of swing in treadmill than in overground walking. The vGRF was higher for 120 %BW compared to 100 %BW on both surfaces (treadmill, first peak: +18.6 %BW; second peak: +13.5 %BW; overground, first peak: +22.2 %BW; second peak: +19.8 %BW). Differences between conditions greater than 20 % were observed in short periods during the gait cycle for vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and semitendinosus.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results regarding the effects of carrying additional load using a weight vest on joint kinematics during treadmill walking may be translated to overground walking but some changes in muscle activation can be expected.

Muscle activation and rating of perceived exertion of typically developing children during DRY and aquatic treadmill walking

Aquatic treadmill gait training is a poorly understood rehabilitation method that alters bodyweight support, increases lower limb resistance, and assists with postural stability. This training could be an attractive tool for clinical populations with balance control issues or limited weight-bearing prescriptions for the lower limb. As a first step, the purpose of this study was to quantify differences in mean muscle activity of the tibialis anterior, rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, and semitendinosus, and perceived exertion (RPE) in typically developing children (7:8 M:F, age = 11.3 ± 4.1 years, 1.46 ± 0.18 m, and 44.2 ± 16.8 kg) during dry and aquatic treadmill walking at 75 %, 100 %, and 125 % self-selected speed. We hypothesized that the greatest mean muscle activity, normalized to percent maximum voluntary contraction and averaged across all strides, would be observed during 125 % dry treadmill walking and that aquatic treadmill walking would produce lower RPE. Overall, aquatic treadmill walking reduced mean medial gastrocnemius activity by 50.2 % (padj < 0.001), increased mean rectus femoris activity at least 32.8 % (padj < 0.006), and produced 78.0 % (padj = 0.007) greater RPE compared to dry treadmill walking. This study provides normative pediatric data for future aquatic treadmill walking studies in clinical populations to help inform gait rehabilitation protocols.

Is treadmill walking biomechanically comparable to overground walking? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The equivalency of treadmill and overground walking has been investigated in a large number of studies. However, no systematic review has been performed on this topic.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical, electromyographical and energy consumption outcomes of motorized treadmill and overground walking.

METHODS

Five databases, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, were searched until January 13, 2021. Studies written in English comparing lower limb biomechanics, electromyography and energy consumption during treadmill and overground walking in healthy young adults (20-40 years) were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (n = 409 participants) were included and evaluated via the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. These 22 studies showed that some kinematic (reduced pelvic ROM, maximum hip flexion angle for females, maximum knee flexion angle for males and cautious gait pattern), kinetic (sagittal plane joint moments: dorsiflexor moments, knee extensor moments and hip extensor moments and sagittal plane joint powers at the knee and hip joints, peak backwards, lateral and medial COP velocities and propulsive forces during late stance) and electromyographic (lower limbs muscles activities) outcome measures were significantly different for motorized treadmill and overground walking.

SIGNIFICANCE

Spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic, electromyographic and energy consumption outcome measures were largely comparable for motorized treadmill and overground walking. However, the differences in kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic parameters should be taken into consideration by clinicians, trainers, and researchers when working on new protocols related to patient rehabilitation, fitness rooms or research as to be as close as possible to the outcome measures of overground walking. The protocol registration number is CRD42021236335 (PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews).

Coordination of trunk and foot acceleration during gait is affected by walking velocity and fall history in elderly adults

BACKGROUND

Falling is a significant concern for many elderly adults but identifying individuals at risk of falling is difficult, and it is not clear how elderly adults adapt to challenging walking.

AIMS

The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of walking at non-preferred speeds on the coordination between foot and trunk acceleration variability in healthy elderly adults with and without fall history compared to healthy young adults.

METHODS

Subjects walked on a treadmill at 80%-120% of their preferred walking speed while trunk and foot accelerations were recorded with wireless inertial sensors. Variability of accelerations was measured by root mean square, range, sample entropy, and Lyapunov exponent. The gait stability index was calculated using each variability metric in the frontal and sagittal plane by taking the ratio of trunk acceleration variability divided by foot acceleration variability.

RESULTS

Healthy young adults demonstrated larger trunk accelerations relative to foot accelerations at faster walking speeds compared to elderly adults, but both young and elderly adults show similar adaption to their acceleration regularity. Between group differences showed that elderly adult fallers coordinate acceleration variability between the trunk and feet differently compared to elderly non-fallers and young adults.

DISCUSSION

The current results indicate that during gait, elderly fallers demonstrate more constrained, less adaptable trunk movement relative to their foot movement and this pattern is different compared to elderly non-fallers and healthy young.

CONCLUSIONS

Coordination between trunk and foot acceleration variability plays an important role in maintaining stability during gait.