High-pitch dual-source CT for coronary artery calcium scoring: A head-to-head comparison of non-triggered chest versus triggered cardiac acquisition

Photon-Counting Chest CT at Radiography-Comparable Dose Levels: Impact on Opportunistic Visual and Semiautomated Coronary Calcium Quantification

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCCT) has allowed for significant dose reductions compared to energy-integrating-detector CT, making it particularly relevant for applications such as lung cancer screening. Coronary artery calcification is an important incidental finding in lung cancer screening, warranting attention in this context. This study aims to assess the impact of dose reduction to levels comparable to that of a chest radiography on opportunistic evaluation of coronary artery calcification on PCCTs of the chest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight out of 115 patients with age >45 years and body mass index ≤30 kg/m2 undergoing noncontrast low- and chest-radiography-comparable-dose PCCT in the same session were included. Scans were performed at 100 kVp with image quality settings 12 (low-dose) and 2 (radiography-comparable-dose). Visual calcium scoring was conducted by 2 readers using 2 scoring approaches (CAD-RADS 2.0 and Shemesh). Semiautomated quantitative analysis was performed using commercially available software. Image quality was evaluated using 5-point Likert scales.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (65.9 ± 8.6 years; 49 men) were subjected to evaluation. CTDI was lower for radiography-dose scans (0.11 mGy vs 0.68 mGy; P < 0.001). Image quality was found to be inferior for radiography-dose scans (4.01 vs 2.03; P < 0.001). In both visual scoring approaches, coronary calcification was scored significantly lower in radiography-dose scans (P < 0.001 for both) with almost perfect reader agreement (CAD-RADS score Cohen's kappa =0.82; Shemesh score Cohen's kappa =0.81), most importantly reclassification from mild to absent occurred for CAD-RADS score in 31%/21% of cases and for Shemesh score in 23%/15% of cases (reader 1/reader 2). Semiautomated assessment showed no significant differences between low and radiography dose (P = 0.121). Strong correlation between scores (Pearson's r = 0.98, P < 0.001) with good agreement (Cohen's kappa =0.61) was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery calcifications are underestimated on radiography-dose PCCT visually, whereas semiautomatic analysis provides more robust results. Visual underestimation of coronary artery calcification in low-dose imaging is further amplified with the additional dose reduction to radiography-comparable dose levels, indicating that while estimation of high cardiovascular risk is feasible, exclusion of such risk is not possible.

Repeatability of AI-based, automatic measurement of vertebral and cardiovascular imaging biomarkers in low-dose chest CT: the ImaLife cohort

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the repeatability of AI-based automatic measurement of vertebral and cardiovascular markers on low-dose chest CT.

METHODS

We included participants of the population-based Imaging in Lifelines (ImaLife) study with low-dose chest CT at baseline and 3-4 month follow-up. An AI system (AI-Rad Companion chest CT prototype) performed automatic segmentation and quantification of vertebral height and density, aortic diameters, heart volume (cardiac chambers plus pericardial fat), and coronary artery calcium volume (CACV). A trained researcher visually checked segmentation accuracy. We evaluated the repeatability of adequate AI-based measurements at baseline and repeat scan using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), relative differences, and change in CACV risk categorization, assuming no physiological change.

RESULTS

Overall, 632 participants (63 ± 11 years; 56.6% men) underwent short-term repeat CT (mean interval, 3.9 ± 1.8 months). Visual assessment showed adequate segmentation in both baseline and repeat scan for 98.7% of vertebral measurements, 80.1-99.4% of aortic measurements (except for the sinotubular junction (65.2%)), and 86.0% of CACV. For heart volume, 53.5% of segmentations were adequate at baseline and repeat scans. ICC for adequately segmented cases showed excellent agreement for all biomarkers (ICC > 0.9). Relative difference between baseline and repeat measurements was < 4% for vertebral and aortic measurements, 7.5% for heart volume, and 28.5% for CACV. There was high concordance in CACV risk categorization (81.2%).

CONCLUSION

In low-dose chest CT, segmentation accuracy of AI-based software was high for vertebral, aortic, and CACV evaluation and relatively low for heart volume. There was excellent repeatability of vertebral and aortic measurements and high concordance in overall CACV risk categorization.

KEY POINTS

Question Can AI algorithms for opportunistic screening in chest CT obtain an accurate and repeatable result when applied to multiple CT scans of the same participant? Findings Vertebral and aortic analysis showed accurate segmentation and excellent repeatability; coronary calcium segmentation was generally accurate but showed modest repeatability due to a non-electrocardiogram-triggered protocol. Clinical relevance Opportunistic screening for diseases outside the primary purpose of the CT scan is time-consuming. AI allows automated vertebral, aortic, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessment, with highly repeatable outcomes of vertebral and aortic biomarkers and high concordance in overall CAC categorization.

Prevalence and clinical implications of coronary artery calcium scoring on non-gated thoracic computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Coronary artery calcifications (CACs) indicate the presence of coronary artery disease. CAC can be found on thoracic computed tomography (CT) conducted for non-cardiac reasons. This systematic review and meta-analysis of non-gated thoracic CT aims to assess the clinical impact and prevalence of CAC.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for articles assessing prevalence, demographic characteristics, accuracy and prognosis of incidental CAC on non-gated thoracic CT. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 108 studies (113,406 patients) were included (38% female). Prevalence of CAC ranged from 2.7 to 100% (pooled prevalence 52%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 46-58%). Patients with CAC were older (pooled standardised mean difference 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.11, p < 0.001), and more likely to be male (pooled odds ratio [OR] 1.95, 95% CI 1.55-2.45, p < 0.001), with diabetes (pooled OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.95-3.54, p < 0.001), hypercholesterolaemia (pooled OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.33-3.93, p < 0.01) and hypertension (pooled OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.26-6.70, p < 0.001), but not higher body mass index or smoking. Non-gated CT assessment of CAC had excellent agreement with electrocardiogram-gated CT (pooled correlation coefficient 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, p < 0.001). In 51,582 patients, followed-up for 51.6 ± 27.4 months, patients with CAC had increased all cause mortality (pooled relative risk [RR] 2.13, 95% CI 1.57-2.90, p = 0.004) and major adverse cardiovascular events (pooled RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.26-3.93, p < 0.001). When CAC was present on CT, it was reported in between 18.6% and 93% of reports.

CONCLUSION

CAC is a common, but underreported, finding on non-gated CT with important prognostic implications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Coronary artery calcium is an important prognostic indicator of cardiovascular disease. It can be assessed on non-gated thoracic CT and is a commonly underreported finding. This represents a significant population where there is a potential missed opportunity for lifestyle modification recommendations and preventative therapies. This study aims to highlight the importance of reporting incidental coronary artery calcium on non-gated thoracic CT.

KEY POINTS

• Coronary artery calcification is a common finding on non-gated thoracic CT and can be reliably identified compared to gated-CT. • Coronary artery calcification on thoracic CT is associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascsular events. • Coronary artery calcification is frequently not reported on non-gated thoracic CT.

Bodyweight-adjusted Contrast Media With Shortened Injection Duration for Step-and-Shoot Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Acquire Improved Image Quality

PURPOSE

Shortened injection durations are not recommended in step-and-shoot coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to evaluate the image quality of CCTA performed using bodyweight-adjusted iodinated contrast media (ICM) with different injection durations to generate an optimized ICM administration protocol to acquire convincible image quality in step-and-shoot CCTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 200 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were enrolled in group A (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration), group B (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.9 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration), group C (N=50, 350 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 12-s injection duration), and group D (N=50, 320 mgI/mL, bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-s injection duration). Patient characteristics, ICM administration protocols, quantitative computed tomography (CT) value measurements, and qualitative image scores were analyzed and compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Groups A and D achieved the lowest ICM volume, saline volume, injection flow rate, and total iodine and iodine injection rates among the groups. All the CT values of the coronary arteries in all groups were >300 HU. All the observers' average scores exceeded three points. In group A, the CT values showed significant positive correlation with the iodine injection rate ( r =0.226, P <0.001), whereas the signal-to-noise ratio ( r =-0.004, P =0.927) and contrast-to-noise ratio ( r =-0.006, P =0.893) values were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Bodyweight×0.8 mL/kg with a 13-second injection duration is a comprehensive option for step-and-shoot CCTA with improved image quality, and a 350 mgI/mL iodine concentration is preferred.

The Clear Value of Coronary Artery Calcification Evaluation on Non-Gated Chest Computed Tomography for Cardiac Risk Stratification

To enhance risk stratification in patients suspected of coronary artery disease, the assessment of coronary artery calcium (CAC) could be incorporated, especially when CAC can be readily assessed on previously performed non-gated chest computed tomography (CT). Guidelines recommend reporting on patients' extent of CAC on these non-cardiac directed exams and various studies have shown the diagnostic and prognostic value. However, this method is still little applied, and no current consensus exists in clinical practice. This review aims to point out the clinical utility of different kinds of CAC assessment on non-gated CTs. It demonstrates that these scans indeed represent a merely untapped and underestimated resource for risk stratification in patients with stable chest pain or an increased risk of cardiovascular events. To our knowledge, this is the first review to describe the clinical utility of different kinds of visual CAC evaluation on non-gated unenhanced chest CT. Various methods of CAC assessment on non-gated CT are discussed and compared in terms of diagnostic and prognostic value. Furthermore, the application of these non-gated CT scans in the general practice of cardiology is discussed. The clinical utility of coronary calcium assessed on non-gated chest CT, according to the current literature, is evident. This resource of information for cardiac risk stratification needs no specific requirements for scan protocol, and is radiation-free and cost-free. However, some gaps in research remain. In conclusion, the integration of CAC on non-gated chest CT in general cardiology should be promoted and research on this method should be encouraged.

Coronary artery calcium scoring assessment in ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of non-electrocardiogram (ECG) -triggered ultra-low-dose CT (ULD-CT) with different reconstruction protocols on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring assessment, compared with ECG-triggered CAC CT (CAC-CT).

METHODS

This prospective study included 115 patients who underwent CAC-CT and ULD-CT scans under the same topogram images. CAC-CT adopted a prospective ECG-triggered sequential acquisition with a tube potential of 120 kV, and the reconstruction protocol was standard Qr36 + slice 3 mm (CACQr-3mm group). ULD-CT adopted a non-ECG-triggered high-pitch acquisition with a tube potential of Sn100 kV, and four groups of images (named ULDQr-3mm, ULDSa-3mm, ULDQr-1.5mm, and ULDSa-1.5mm) were reconstructed using different reconstruction algorithms (standard Qr36, kV-independent Sa36) and slice thicknesses (3 mm, 1.5 mm). The accuracy of CAC detection by ULD-CT was calculated. The agreement of the CAC score between ULD-CT and CAC-CT scans was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot, and the agreement of risk categorization was assessed using weighted kappa.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of the ULDSa-1.5mm group for detecting positive CAC were 100% and 97.4%, respectively (k = 0.980). The CAC score for the ULDSa-3mm and ULDSa-1.5mm groups demonstrated excellent agreement with the CACQr-3mm group (ICC = 0.992, 0.990, respectively), with a mean difference of -12.3 and - 12.4. The agreement of risk categorization based on absolute and percentile CAC score between the ULDSa-1.5mm and CACQr-3mm groups was excellent (weighted k = 0.954, 0.983, respectively), and risk reclassification rates were low (3.5%, 2.8%, respectively). The effective dose was reduced by approximately 77.2% for the ULD-CT compared to the CAC-CT (0.18 mSv vs. 0.79 mSv, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction with a 1.5-mm slice thickness and kV-independent iterative algorithmic protocol in ULD-CT yielded excellent agreement in CAC score quantification and risk categorization compared with ECG-triggered CAC-CT.

Coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison between filtered-back projection, hybrid iterative reconstruction, and deep learning reconstruction techniques

BACKGROUND

The reference protocol for the quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) should be updated to meet the standards of modern imaging techniques.

PURPOSE

To assess the influence of filtered-back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), and three levels of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) on CAC quantification on both in vitro and in vivo studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In vitro study was performed with a multipurpose anthropomorphic chest phantom and small pieces of bones. The real volume of each piece was measured using the water displacement method. In the in vivo study, 100 patients (84 men; mean age = 71.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent CAC scoring with a tube voltage of 120 kVp and image thickness of 3 mm. The image reconstruction was done with FBP, hybrid IR, and three levels of DLR including mild (DLRmild), standard (DLRstd), and strong (DLRstr).

RESULTS

In the in vitro study, the calcium volume was equivalent (P = 0.949) among FBP, hybrid IR, DLRmild, DLRstd, and DLRstr. In the in vivo study, the image noise was significantly lower in images that used DLRstr-based reconstruction, when compared images other reconstructions (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the calcium volume (P = 0.987) and Agatston score (P = 0.991) among FBP, hybrid IR, DLRmild, DLRstd, and DLRstr. The highest overall agreement of Agatston scores was found in the DLR groups (98%) and hybrid IR (95%) when compared to standard FBP reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

The DLRstr presented the lowest bias of agreement in the Agatston scores and is recommended for the accurate quantification of CAC.

Opportunistic deep learning powered calcium scoring in oncologic patients with very high coronary artery calcium (≥ 1000) undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT

Our aim was to identify and quantify high coronary artery calcium (CAC) with deep learning (DL)-powered CAC scoring (CACS) in oncological patients with known very high CAC (≥ 1000) undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT for re-/staging. 100 patients were enrolled: 50 patients with Agatston scores ≥ 1000 (high CACS group), 50 patients with Agatston scores < 1000 (negative control group). All patients underwent oncological 18F-FDG-PET/CT and cardiac SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by 99mTc-tetrofosmin within 6 months. CACS was manually performed on dedicated non-contrast ECG-gated CT scans obtained from SPECT-MPI (reference standard). Additionally, CACS was performed fully automatically with a user-independent DL-CACS tool on non-contrast, free-breathing, non-gated CT scans from 18F-FDG-PET/CT examinations. Image quality and noise of CT scans was assessed. Agatston scores obtained by manual CACS and DL tool were compared. The high CACS group had Agatston scores of 2200 ± 1620 (reference standard) and 1300 ± 1011 (DL tool, average underestimation of 38.6 ± 26%) with an intraclass correlation of 0.714 (95% CI 0.546, 0.827). Sufficient image quality significantly improved the DL tool's capability of correctly assigning Agatston scores ≥ 1000 (p = 0.01). In the control group, the DL tool correctly assigned Agatston scores < 1000 in all cases. In conclusion, DL-based CACS performed on non-contrast free-breathing, non-gated CT scans from 18F-FDG-PET/CT examinations of patients with known very high (≥ 1000) CAC underestimates CAC load, but correctly assigns an Agatston scores ≥ 1000 in over 70% of cases, provided sufficient CT image quality. Subgroup analyses of the control group showed that the DL tool does not generate false-positives.

Automated total and vessel-specific coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantification on chest CT: direct comparison with CAC scoring on non-contrast cardiac CT

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the artificial intelligence (AI)-based coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantification and regional distribution of CAC on non-gated chest CT, using standard electrocardiograph (ECG)-gated CAC scoring as the reference.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 405 patients underwent non-gated chest CT and standard ECG-gated cardiac CT. An AI-based algorithm was used for automated CAC scoring on chest CT, and Agatston score on cardiac CT was manually quantified. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement of absolute Agatston score between the two scans at the patient and vessel levels. Linearly weighted kappa (κ) was calculated to assess the reliability of AI-based CAC risk categorization and the number of involved vessels on chest CT.

RESULTS

The AI-based algorithm showed moderate reliability for the number of involved vessels in comparison to measures on cardiac CT (κ = 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.79, P < 0.001) and an assignment agreement of 76%. Considerable coronary arteries with CAC were not identified with a per-vessel false-negative rate of 59.3%, 17.8%, 34.9%, and 34.7% for LM, LAD, CX, and RCA on chest CT. The leading causes for false negatives of LM were motion artifact (56.3%, 18/32) and segmentation error (43.8%, 14/32). The motion artifact was almost the only cause for false negatives of LAD (96.6%, 28/29), CX (96.7%, 29/30), and RCA (100%, 34/34). Absolute Agatston scores on chest CT were underestimated either for the patient and individual vessels except for LAD (median difference: - 12.5, - 11.3, - 5.6, - 18.6 for total, LM, CX, and RCA, all P < 0.01; - 2.5 for LAD, P = 0.18). AI-based total Agatston score yielded good reliability for risk categorization (weighted κ 0.86, P < 0.001) and an assignment agreement of 86.7% on chest CT, with a per-patient false-negative rate of 15.2% (28/184) and false-positive rate of 0.5% (1/221) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-based per-patient CAC quantification on non-gated chest CT achieved a good agreement with dedicated ECG-gated CAC scoring overall and highly reliable CVD risk categorization, despite a slight but significant underestimation. However, it is challenging to evaluate the regional distribution of CAC without ECG-synchronization.

Diagnostic Value of Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence Powered Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring from 18F-FDG PET/CT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI) powered coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) method on ungated CT in oncologic patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT. Methods: A total of 100 oncologic patients examined between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively included. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and cardiac SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) by 99mTc-tetrofosmin within 6 months. CACS was manually performed on non-contrast ECG-gated CT scans obtained from SPECT-MPI (i.e., reference standard). Additionally, CACS was performed using a cloud-based, user-independent tool (AI-CACS) on ungated CT scans from 18F-FDG-PET/CT examinations. Agatston scores from the manual CACS and AI-CACS were compared. Results: On a per-patient basis, the AI-CACS tool achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 90% for the detection of CAC. Interscore agreement of CACS between manual CACS and AI-CACS was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.827, 0.918). Interclass agreement of risk categories was 0.8 in weighted Kappa analysis, with a reclassification rate of 44% and an underestimation of one risk category by AI-CACS in 39% of cases. On a per-vessel basis, interscore agreement of CAC scores ranged from 0.716 for the circumflex artery to 0.863 for the left anterior descending artery. Conclusions: Fully automated AI-CACS as performed on non-contrast free-breathing, ungated CT scans from 18F-FDG-PET/CT examinations is feasible and provides an acceptable to good estimation of CAC burden. CAC load on ungated CT is, however, generally underestimated by AI-CACS, which should be taken into account when interpreting imaging findings.

The Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography: A year in review 2021

This review aims to summarize original articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (JCCT) for the year 2021, focusing on those that had the most scientific and educational impact. The JCCT continues to expand; the number of submissions, published manuscripts, cited articles, article downloads, social media presence, and impact factor continues to increase. The articles selected by the Editorial Board of the JCCT in this review focus on coronary artery disease, coronary physiology, structural heart disease, and technical advances in cardiovascular CT. In addition, we highlight key consensus documents and guidelines published in the Journal in 2021. The Journal recognizes the tremendous work done by each author and reviewer this year - thank you.

Quantification of Calcium in Peripheral Arteries of the Lower Extremities: Comparison of Different CT Scanners and Scoring Platforms

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the interscanner and interscoring platform variability of calcium quantification in peripheral arteries of the lower extremities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty human fresh-frozen legs were scanned using 3 different computed tomography (CT) scanners. The radiation dose (CTDIvol) was kept similar for all scanners. The calcium scores (Agatston and volume scores) were quantified using 4 semiautomatic scoring platforms. Comparative analysis of the calcium scores between scanners and scoring platforms was performed by using the Friedman test; post hoc analysis was performed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Sixteen legs had calcifications and were used for data analysis. Agatston and volume scores ranged from 12.1 to 6580 Agatston units and 18.2 to 5579 mm3. Calcium scores differed significantly between Philips IQon and Philips Brilliance 64 (Agatston: 19.5% [P = 0.001]; volume: 14.5% [P = 0.001]) and Siemens Somatom Force (Agatston: 18.1% [P = 0.001]; volume: 17.5% [P = 0.001]). The difference between Brilliance 64 and Somatom Force was smaller (Agatston: 5.6% [P = 0.778]; volume: 7.7% [P = 0.003]). With respect to the interscoring platform variability, OsiriX produced significantly different Agatston scores compared with the other 3 scoring platforms (OsiriX vs IntelliSpace: 14.8% [P = 0.001] vs Syngo CaScore: 13.9% [P = 0.001] vs iX viewer: 13.2% [P < 0.001]). For the volume score, the differences between all scoring platforms were small ranging from 2.9% to 4.0%. Post hoc analysis showed a significant difference between OsiriX and IntelliSpace (3.8% [P = 0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of different CT scanners resulted in notably different Agatston and volume scores, whereas the use of different scoring platforms resulted in limited variability especially for the volume score. In conclusion, the variability in calcium quantification was most evident between different CT scanners and for the Agatston score.

Performance of artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium scoring in non-gated chest CT

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk category performance of artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium score (AI-CACS) software used in non-gated chest computed tomography (CT) on three types of CT machines, considering the manual method as the standard.

METHODS

A total of 901 patients who underwent both chest CT and electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated non-contrast-enhanced cardiac CT with the same equipment within a 3-month period were enrolled in the study. AI-CACS software was based on a deep learning algorithm and was trained on multi-vendor, multi-scanner, and multi-hospital anonymized data from the chest CT database. The AI-CACS was automatically obtained from chest CT data by the AI-CACS software, while the manual CACS was obtained from cardiac CT data by the manual method. The correlation of the AI-CACS and manual CACS, concordance rate and kappa value of the risk categories determined by the two methods were calculated. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the differences in risk categories among the three types of CT machines from different manufacturers. The risk category performance of the AI-CACS for dichotomous risk categories bounded by 0, 100 and 400 was assessed.

RESULTS

The correlation of the AI-CACS with the manual CACS was ρ = 0.893 (p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman plot (AI-CACS minus manual CACS) showed a mean difference of -27.2 and 95% limits of agreement of -290.0 to 235.6. The agreement of risk categories for the CACS was kappa (κ) = 0.679 (p < 0.001), and the concordance rate was 80.6%. The risk categories determined by the AI-CACS software on three types of CT machines were not significantly different (p = 0.7543). As dichotomous risk categories bounded by 0, 100 and 400, the accuracy, kappa value, and area under the curve of the AI-CACS were 88.6% vs. 92.9% vs. 97.9%, 0.77 vs. 0.77 vs. 0.83, and 0.885 vs. 0.964 vs. 0.981, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was good correlation and agreement between the AI-CACS and manual CACS in terms of the risk category. It is feasible to obtain the CACS using AI software based on non-gated chest CT data in a short time without increasing the radiation dose or economic burden. The AI-CACS software algorithm has good clinical universality and can be applied to CT machines from different manufacturers.

Accurate Measurement of Agatston Score Using kVp-Independent Reconstruction Algorithm for Ultra-High-Pitch Sn150 kVp CT

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the accuracy of the Agatston score obtained with the ultra-high-pitch (UHP) acquisition mode using tin-filter spectral shaping (Sn150 kVp) and a kVp-independent reconstruction algorithm to reduce the radiation dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 114 patients (mean ± standard deviation, 60.3 ± 9.8 years; 74 male) who underwent a standard 120 kVp scan and an additional UHP Sn150 kVp scan for coronary artery calcification scoring (CACS). These two datasets were reconstructed using a standard reconstruction algorithm (120 kVp + Qr36d, protocol A; Sn150 kVp + Qr36d, protocol B). In addition, the Sn150 kVp dataset was reconstructed using a kVp-independent reconstruction algorithm (Sn150 kVp + Sa36d, protocol C). The Agatston scores for protocols A and B, as well as protocols A and C, were compared. The agreement between the scores was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot. The radiation doses for the 120 kVp and UHP Sn150 kVp acquisition modes were also compared.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the Agatston score for protocols A (median, 63.05; interquartile range [IQR], 0-232.28) and C (median, 60.25; IQR, 0-195.20) (p = 0.060). The mean difference in the Agatston score for protocols A and C was relatively small (-7.82) and with the limits of agreement from -65.20 to 49.56 (ICC = 0.997). The Agatston score for protocol B (median, 34.85; IQR, 0-120.73) was significantly underestimated compared with that for protocol A (p < 0.001). The UHP Sn150 kVp mode facilitated an effective radiation dose reduction by approximately 30% (0.58 vs. 0.82 mSv, p < 0.001) from that associated with the standard 120 kVp mode.

CONCLUSION

The Agatston scores for CACS with the UHP Sn150 kVp mode with a kVp-independent reconstruction algorithm and the standard 120 kVp demonstrated excellent agreement with a small mean difference and narrow agreement limits. The UHP Sn150 kVp mode allowed a significant reduction in the radiation dose.

Automatic coronary calcium scoring in chest CT using a deep neural network in direct comparison with non-contrast cardiac CT: A validation study

PURPOSE

To evaluate deep-learning based calcium quantification on Chest CT scans compared with manual evaluation, and to enable interpretation in terms of the traditional Agatston score on dedicated Cardiac CT.

METHODS

Automated calcium quantification was performed using a combination of deep-learning convolution neural networks with a ResNet-architecture for image features and a fully connected neural network for spatial coordinate features. Calcifications were identified automatically, after which the algorithm automatically excluded all non-coronary calcifications using coronary probability maps and aortic segmentation. The algorithm was first trained on cardiac-CTs and refined on non-triggered chest-CTs. This study used on 95 patients (cohort 1), who underwent both dedicated calcium scoring and chest-CT acquisitions using the Agatston score as reference standard and 168 patients (cohort 2) who underwent chest-CT only using qualitative expert assessment for external validation. Results from the deep-learning model were compared to Agatston-scores(cardiac-CTs) and manually determined calcium volumes(chest-CTs) and risk classifications.

RESULTS

In cohort 1, the Agatston score and AI determined calcium volume shows high correlation with a correlation coefficient of 0.921(p < 0.001) and R² of 0.91. According to the Agatston categories, a total of 67(70 %) were correctly classified with a sensitivity of 91 % and specificity of 92 % in detecting presence of coronary calcifications. Manual determined calcium volume on chest-CT showed excellent correlation with the AI volumes with a correlation coefficient of 0.923(p < 0.001) and R² of 0.96, no significant difference was found (p = 0.247). According to qualitative risk classifications in cohort 2, 138(82 %) cases were correctly classified with a k-coefficient of 0.74, representing good agreement. All wrongly classified scans (30(18 %)) were attributed to an adjacent category.

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence based calcium quantification on chest-CTs shows good correlation compared to reference standards. Fully automating this process may reduce evaluation time and potentially optimize clinical calcium scoring without additional acquisitions.

The sub-millisievert era in CTCA: the technical basis of the new radiation dose approach

Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has become a cornerstone in the diagnostic process of the heart disease. Although the cardiac imaging with interventional procedures is responsible for approximately 40% of the cumulative effective dose in medical imaging, a relevant radiation dose reduction over the last decade was obtained, with the beginning of the sub-mSv era in CTCA. The main technical basis to obtain a radiation dose reduction in CTCA is the use of a low tube voltage, the adoption of a prospective electrocardiogram-triggering spiral protocol and the application of the tube current modulation with the iterative reconstruction technique. Nevertheless, CTCA examinations are characterized by a wide range of radiation doses between different radiology departments. Moreover, the dose exposure in CTCA is extremely important because the benefit-risk calculus in comparison with other modalities also depends on it. Finally, because anatomical evaluation not adequately predicts the hemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis, a low radiation dose in routine CTCA would allow the greatest use of the myocardial CT perfusion, fractional flow reserve-CT, dual-energy CT and artificial intelligence, to shift focus from morphological assessment to a comprehensive morphological and functional evaluation of the stenosis. Therefore, the aim of this work is to summarize the correct use of the technical basis in order that CTCA becomes an established examination for assessment of the coronary artery disease with low radiation dose.