Diagnostic Value of Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence Powered Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring from 18F-FDG PET/CT

Artificial Intelligence Empowered Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging in Cardiology: A State-of-the-Art Review

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging plays a significant role in the detection and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD). With recent advancements in computer power and the availability of digital archives, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly gaining traction in the field of medical imaging, including nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. However, the complex and time-consuming workflow and interpretation involved in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, limit their extensive utilization in clinical practice. To address this challenge, AI has emerged as a fundamental tool for enhancing the role of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. It has shown promising applications in various crucial aspects of nuclear cardiology, such as optimizing imaging protocols, facilitating data processing, aiding in CVD diagnosis, risk classification and prognosis. In this review paper, we will introduce the key concepts of AI and provide an overview of its current progress in the field of nuclear cardiology. In addition, we will discuss future perspectives for AI in this domain.

Feasibility and limitations of deep learning-based coronary calcium scoring in PET-CT: a comparison with coronary calcium score CT

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and limitations of deep learning-based coronary calcium scoring using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in comparison with coronary calcium scoring using ECG-gated non-contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CaCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 215 individuals who underwent both CaCT and PET-CT were enrolled in this retrospective study. The Agatston method was used to calculate the coronary artery calcium scores (CACS) from CaCT, PET-CT(reader), and PET-CT(AI) to analyse the effect of using different modalities and AI-based software on CACS measurement. The total CACS and CACS classified according to the CAC-DRS guidelines were compared between the three sets of CACS. The differences, correlation coefficients, intraclass coefficients (ICC), and concordance rates were analysed. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient of the total CACS from CaCT and PET-CT(reader) was 0.837, PET-CT(reader) and PET-CT(AI) was 0.894, and CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 0.768. The ICC of CACS from CaCT and PET-CT(reader) was 0.911, PET-CT(reader) and PET-CT(AI) was 0.958, and CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 0.842. The concordance rate between CaCT and PET-CT(AI) was 73.8%, with a false-negative rate of 37.3% and a false-positive rate of 4.4%. Age and male sex were associated with an increased misclassification rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Artificial intelligence-assisted CACS measurements in PET-CT showed comparable results to CACS in coronary calcium CT. However, the relatively high false-negative results and tendency to underestimate should be of concern.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Application of automated calcium scoring to PET-CT studies could potentially select patients at high risk of coronary artery disease from among cancer patients known to be susceptible to coronary artery disease and undergoing routine PET-CT scans.

KEY POINTS

• Cancer patients are susceptible to coronary disease, and PET-CT could be potentially used to calculate coronary artery calcium score (CACS). • Calcium scoring using artificial intelligence in PET-CT automatically provides CACS with high ICC to CACS in coronary calcium CT. • However, underestimation and false negatives of CACS calculation in PET-CT should be considered.