Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis

Safety of Single Preoperative Dose of Enoxaparin for Hepatectomy: A Study in a Country With Low Venous Thromboembolism Incidence

BACKGROUND

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis for hepatectomy is debated in low-VTE incidence regions like Thailand due to bleeding risks. This study evaluated single-dose preoperative enoxaparin safety for VTE prophylaxis, focusing on post-hepatectomy hemorrhage (PHH).

METHODS

This retrospective review compared VTE and PHH incidence before (no prophylaxis) and after implementation of a single preoperative dose of enoxaparin 40 mg for all patients undergoing elective hepatectomy in a center in Thailand. PHH and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) were defined per International Study Group of Liver Surgery criteria. Factors associated with PHH were analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients underwent elective hepatectomy (mean age 58 years). Fifty-two percent underwent major hepatectomy. PHLF occurred in 11% of patients. VTE occurred in 0% (0/96) of the pre-protocol and 1.1% (1/90) of the post-protocol group. PHH rate was 3.8%, with no difference between pre-protocol (3/96) and post-protocol groups (4/90). Factors associated with PHH were intraoperative transfusion > 2 units (OR 33.3; 95% CI 1.9-587.7) and PHLF (OR 17.2; 95% CI 2.1-140.8), but not enoxaparin (OR 1.9; 95% CI 0.3-12.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Single preoperative enoxaparin did not increase PHH risk in this low VTE incidence cohort and may be considered for VTE prophylaxis in similar populations.

Contemporary management of portal vein thromboses in patients with and without cirrhosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Portal vein thromboses (PVT) is a common clotting disorder that can be seen in patients with and without cirrhosis. There are no current clinical guidelines on management of portal vein thromboses in these two distinct populations given most studies are retrospective and comprised of heterogenous cohorts.

RECENT FINDINGS

When evaluating PVT, patients must first be stratified into those with cirrhosis and those without cirrhosis. In addition, a novel nomenclature can help categorize specific PVT types and determine the need and response to anticoagulation. The management of PVT in patients with cirrhosis varies and is primarily dependent on whether the PVT is recent or chronic. In contrast, patients without cirrhosis are almost always anticoagulated to avoid complications of PVT. Direct oral anticoagulants, low-molecular weight heparin, and vitamin-K antagonists have all been used in patients with and without cirrhosis, without clear guidance on optimal treatment duration and surveillance.

SUMMARY

Direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly used for patients with PVT though there is limited data on the safety and efficacy of these medications. The risk/benefit profiles of various anticoagulants must be considered when choosing a therapeutic anticoagulant. There are ongoing studies evaluating outcome measures of different anticoagulants in patients with PVT. Large, multicenter, randomized controlled trials may help elucidate the efficacy of anticoagulants on various outcome measures in PVT, including recanalization, bleeding, and survival.

Anticoagulation outcomes in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a tertiary center study

STUDY PURPOSE

This study assesses the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to traditional anticoagulants in managing portal vein thrombosis (PVT), aiming to address critical gaps in both research and clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective analysis at Rochester General Hospital from January 2011 to December 2023, involving 275 cirrhotic patients with PVT. The inclusion criteria included confirmed non-neoplastic PVT by imaging.

RESULTS

Analysis of 275 cirrhotic patients with PVT revealed no significant differences in age and gender between those treated with anticoagulants and those untreated. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the treated group (37.7%) compared to the untreated group (51.7%; P = 0.029). Gastrointestinal bleeding was slightly more prevalent in the treated group (60.7%) than in the untreated group (58.1%; P = 0.690), though not statistically significant. A significant reduction in intracranial hemorrhage was observed in the treated group (2.5% vs. 8.5% in the untreated group; P = 0.038). In a subgroup analysis comparing the outcomes and side effects of DOACs, Warfarin, and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in treated PVT patients, the DOAC group showed improved survival rates compared to traditional [vitamin K antagonists (VKA)/LMWH] treatment, a log-rank test indicated significant survival improvement (chi2 (1) = 8.27, P = 0.0040). DOACs demonstrated comparable mortality rates to VKAs (34.2% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.979) and a significant survival benefit over LMWH (33.3% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

DOAC in treating PVT among patients with liver cirrhosis, demonstrating better significant survival rate when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Key message What is already known on this topic  Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is significantly more prevalent in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to the general population, posing substantial management challenges. Previous studies have primarily focused on small cohorts and retrospective data, underscoring the need for robust, large-scale analyses to validate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus traditional therapies. What this study adds  This study provides concrete evidence from a large cohort that DOACs not only offer a survival benefit over traditional anticoagulation therapies like Warfarin and LMWH in cirrhotic patients with PVT but also maintain comparable safety profiles. These findings bridge significant gaps in current research by comparing the outcomes of modern versus traditional anticoagulant approaches in a real-world setting. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy  The results advocate for the inclusion of DOACs in clinical guidelines for managing PVT in cirrhosis, potentially shifting clinical practice toward these agents. Furthermore, the detailed comparison and subgroup analyses provide a strong foundation for future randomized controlled trials, which could further refine anticoagulation strategies in this high-risk population.

Fibrinolytic Dysregulation in Regional Hemostasis During Liver Transplantation: A Viscoelastometry-Based Pilot Study

Background/Objectives: In chronic liver disease, a rebalanced coagulation state often results in an increased risk of thrombosis, particularly in the splanchnic region. While systemic coagulation abnormalities are well documented, alterations in regional (portal) hemostasis remain underexplored. This study aimed to compare systemic and portal hemostasis during liver transplantation and to determine whether systemic parameters can accurately predict regional coagulation status. Methods: Thirty-five liver transplant recipients were included in this study. Systemic blood samples (S1-S5) were collected from the external jugular vein at five surgical time points, while portal blood samples (R3) were obtained immediately before reperfusion simultaneously with S3. All samples were analyzed using ClotPro® viscoelastic assays, conventional coagulation tests, and blood gas analysis. Results: The EX-test comparison between S3 and R3 samples revealed a discrepancy between systemic and regional hemostasis in 45.7% of patients. Among these, eight regional samples exhibited hypocoagulation characterized by coagulation factor consumption and hyperfibrinolysis. Another eight samples demonstrated hypercoagulation with fibrinolytic shutdown, which was confirmed by a fibrin-rich thrombus identified via scanning electron microscopy. Systemic samples failed to predict these regional variations. Conclusions: Regional (portal) hemostasis significantly differs from systemic coagulation and cannot be accurately predicted using systemic assays alone. These findings suggest that fibrinolytic shutdown in the portal vein may contribute to intraoperative and long-term graft damage, highlighting a potential need for regional coagulation assessment during liver transplantation.

Noninvasive Assessment of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Through Radiomic Features

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with delayed diagnosis often limiting effective treatment options. This study introduces a novel, noninvasive radiomics-based approach using [18F] FDG PET/CT (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography) to predict vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) status and survival in patients with GC. The ability to noninvasively assess these parameters can significantly influence therapeutic decisions and outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with GC, stratified into training, validation, and test groups. Each patient underwent a [18F] FDG PET/CT scan, and radiomic features were extracted using dedicated software. A Radiomics Score (RS) was calculated, serving as a predictor for VEGF status. Statistical analyses included logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the predictive power of RS on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The developed radiomics model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with the RS formula achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.861 in the training cohort and 0.857 in the validation cohort for predicting VEGF status. The model also identified RS as an independent prognostic factor for survival, where higher RS values correlated with poorer survival rates.

DISCUSSION

The findings underscore the potential of [18F] FDG PET/CT radiomics in transforming the management of GC by providing a noninvasive means to assess tumor aggressiveness and prognosis through VEGF status. This model could facilitate earlier and more tailored therapeutic interventions, potentially improving survival outcomes in a disease marked by typically late diagnosis and limited treatment success.

Experience With Dabigatran on Rate of Portal Vein Thrombosis Recanalization, Disease Progression and Survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We assessed clinical, procoagulant and genetic risk factors and clinical outcomes in dabigatran-treated patients with non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

METHODS

Patients with a new diagnosis of non-tumoural acute and acute-on-chronic PVT between January 2021 and January 2024 (aged ≥ 18 years) in those without/with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh (CP)-A/B/C ≤ 10) were started on dabigatran and followed and compared with those on vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and untreated individuals.

RESULTS

Dabigatran was prescribed in 119 patients with PVT type 1 (61, 51.3%), type 2 (34, 28.6%), type 3 (24, 20.2%); 72 (60.5%) with cirrhosis [CP-A (27, 37.5%), CP-B (43, 59.7%) and CP-C10 (2, 2.8%)]. Procoagulant factors noted were JAK2V617F (10.1%), CALR (2.5%) and factor V Leiden (1.6%) mutations, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, 15.2%), isolated Protein C (14.3%) and Protein S (16.8%) deficiency.

COMPARATORS

28 patients who declined anticoagulation/were unable to come for follow-up, and six with CP-C received VKA. Overall recanalization rate (RR) on dabigatran was 56 (47.1%); 25 (21%) complete recanalization, 31 (26%) partial recanalization and 63 (52.9%) stable PVT over median follow-up of 32 months. Patients not anticoagulated had a spontaneous RR in 21.4% (28 patients; p = 0.005 compared with dabigatran group) and none recanalized on VKA. On multivariable analysis, predictors of recanalization on dabigatran were Factor VIII Antigen level (FVIII:Ag, HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p = 0.032), non-occlusive PVT (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9-5.6, p = 0.025) and acute PVT (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.5-3.2, p = 0.003). Mortality was 14 (11.8%).

CONCLUSION

On dabigatran, 47% of 119 patients achieved portal vein recanalization over 32 months of follow-up which was higher than the spontaneous RR (21.4%) in an untreated cohort. High Factor VIII:Ag was a predictor of non-recanalization. Dabigatran was safe in cirrhosis (CP-A and B) while further work is needed in CP-C.

Portal vein thrombosis in a patient on semaglutide

Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are modern-day pandemics that have a significant impact on global healthcare. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) semaglutide is a novel treatment for both tbl2DM and obesity, but can be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. Case presentation: This case report describes a 59-year-old woman with tbl2DM who received semaglutide to manage glycemic levels, and also experienced the additional benefit of weight reduction. Within six months of initiating GLP1-RA, the patient experienced low back pain associated with nausea and poor oral intake. She had no known risk factors for venous thromboembolism or thrombophilia and had no history of significant illness in her family. Her physical examination revealed no significant findings. Only mild leukocytosis and neutrophilia were noted. She underwent an abdominal computed tomography scan, which revealed intrahepatic portal vein thrombosis without evidence of liver cirrhosis or abdominal malignancy. Her symptoms improved with oral anticoagulation (rivaroxaban). The result of thrombophilia examination was negative for inherited or acquired thrombophilia, except for a Janus kinase 2 mutation, which may increase the risk of thrombosis. Conclusions: The use of GLP1-RA is increasing due to the growing desire for weight loss medications. Therefore, it is important that physicians better understand the possible risks of thrombosis before initiating GLP1-RA treatment.

The Imbalance of Homeostasis in Neutrophil Extracellular Traps is Associated with Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Decompensated Cirrhosis

Background and Aims

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a challenging complication in liver cirrhosis, with no currently available sensitive diagnostic markers. This study aimed to investigate the potential of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and Deoxyribonuclease (DNase) as diagnostic indicators for PVT in chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related decompensated cirrhosis.

Methods

We analyzed 145 CHB-related decompensated cirrhosis patients from the Ditan study and 33 from the Changgung validation study, categorizing them based on PVT occurrence. Plasma samples were assessed for NET markers, including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and histone-DNA complexes, along with DNase activity.

Results

PVT patients exhibited elevated levels of cfDNA and histone-DNA complexes, and reduced DNase activity. This pattern persisted regardless of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) status. Histone-DNA levels, DNase activity, and hemoglobin were identified as independent risk factors for PVT. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that high histone-DNA levels may serve as a potential diagnostic marker for PVT, with an area under the curve of 0.8628 in the Ditan study and 0.7521 in the Changgung study. When combined with cfDNA and DNase activity, the area under the curve improved to 0.8774 in the Ditan study and 0.7975 in the Changgung study.

Conclusions

Imbalances in NET homeostasis are associated with PVT in CHB-related decompensated cirrhosis, including cases involving HCC. Histone-DNA complexes, a significant risk factor for PVT, show potential as a diagnostic marker for PVT in decompensated cirrhosis, particularly in HBV-related HCC.

A pilot study of safety and efficacy comparison of low molecular heparin calcium sequential oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to compare and assess the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH-Ca), followed by either warfarin or rivaroxaban, as treatment options for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

In this pilot study, cirrhotic (with liver function score of Child-Pugh A) patients diagnosed with PVT who were not on anticoagulant therapy received 2 weeks of subcutaneous injections of LMWH-Ca. They were then randomized to either warfarin (a full course of oral warfarin for 6 months) or rivaroxaban (a full course of oral rivaroxaban for 2 months), with 30 cases in each group. After a treatment period of up to 6 months, a comparative analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of both groups. Volumetric changes in PVT were monitored dynamically using enhanced computed tomography scans before treatment at week 2 and month 6.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the patients between the two groups. Rivaroxaban treatment reduced PVT median volume from 1.83 cm3 at week 2 to 0.0 cm3 at month 6 and prevented the worsening of PVT after 6 months of treatment with LMWH-Ca (P < 0.001). On the other hand, warfarin treatment increased PVT median volume from 1.95 cm3 at week 2 to 3.78 cm3 at month 6 (P = 0.002). None of the 30 patients in the rivaroxaban group had clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding, while 2 of the 30 patients (7%) in the warfarin group had gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.317).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban followed by LMWH-Ca is an effective anticoagulant treatment strategy for PVT in cirrhosis.

Impact of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis: A large-scale retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients presents a significant clinical challenge. This study aims to (1) explore the impact of anticoagulation therapy on patient outcomes; (2) comparative outcomes in portal vein thrombosis treated between direct oral anticoagulant and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We leveraged the TriNetX database to analyze a cohort comprising 4224 patients with liver cirrhosis and PVT who were treated with anticoagulation, alongside a comparison group of 15,300 patients with the same conditions but not receiving anticoagulation therapy.

RESULTS

The anticoagulated group showed a significant reduction in mortality (27.9 % vs. 34.2 %, HR = 0.723, 95 % CI: 0.678-0.770, P < 0.001). When comparing direct oral anticoagulant versus. VKA, in compensated liver cirrhosis, the direct oral anticoagulant group exhibited significantly lower mortality rates compared to VKA (17.7 % vs. 26.5 %, HR = 0.655, 95 % CI: 0.452-0.951, P = 0.025), with no significant difference in liver transplantation rates (4.0 % vs. 4.7 %, P = 0.080). In decompensated liver cirrhosis, the direct oral anticoagulant group exhibited lower mortality compared to the VKA group (23.6 % vs. 30.6 %, HR = 0.732, 95 % CI: 0.629-0.851, P < 0.001), and a higher frequency of liver transplantation was observed in the VKA group (10.6 % vs. 16.0 %, HR = 0.622, 95 % CI: 0.494-0.784, P < 0.001). Hospitalization rates were significantly lower in the direct oral anticoagulant group compared to the VKA group in decompensated cirrhosis (33.4 % vs. 38.3 %, HR = 0.830, 95 % CI: 0.695-0.992, P = 1.937).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study offers compelling evidence supporting the use of anticoagulation therapy in liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis. The use of DOACs in patients with both compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis showed a marked mortality benefit.

Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Classification and Clinical Relevance

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a well-recognized clinico-pathological entity, which is associated with clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, and endoscopic features of portal hypertension (PHT), in absence of cirrhosis. In patients with NCPH without known risk factors of PHT or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, the condition is called idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). There are multiple infectious, immune related causes, systemic diseases, drug and toxin exposures, haematological disorders, and metabolic risk factors that have been associated with this INCPH. However, the causal pathogenesis is still unclear. The Vascular liver disorders interest group group recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a syndromic entity, which provides definite histopathological criteria for diagnosis of NCPH (table 1). The three classical histo-morphological lesions specific for PSVD include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. The PSVD definition includes patients with portal vein thrombosis, PVT, and even those without PHT, thus broadening the scope of diagnosis to include patients who may have presented early, prior to haemodynamic changes consistent with PHT. However, this new diagnosis has pros and cons. The cons include mandating invasive liver biopsy to assess the PSVD histological triad in all patients with NCPH, an erstwhile clinical diagnosis in Asian patients. In addition, the natural history of the subclinical forms of PSVD without PHT and linear progression to develop PHT is unknown yet. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD, fallacies and strengths of the old and new schema, pathobiology of this disease, and clinical correlates in an Asian context. Although formulation of standardised diagnostic criteria is useful for comparison of clinical cohorts with INCPH/PSVD, prospective clinical validation in global cohorts is necessary to avoid misclassification of vascular disorders of the liver.

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: The State-of-the-Art on Anticoagulant Treatment

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) is a rare type of venous thromboembolism occurring within the splanchnic venous system. Portal vein thrombosis is the most common presentation, while Budd-Chiari syndrome is the least common. Liver cirrhosis and abdominal solid cancer are the main local risk factors for SVT, whereas myeloproliferative neoplasms are the predominant systemic risk factors. Signs and symptoms of SVT are nonspecific and include abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. Asymptomatic SVT is not uncommon, and the majority would be detected incidentally on routine abdominal imaging performed for the follow-up of liver diseases and tumors. The management of SVT aims to prevent thrombus progression, promote vessel recanalization, and prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulation should be started early in order to increase the chances of vessel recanalization and reduce the risk of portal hypertension-related complications. Direct oral anticoagulants have been included in recent guidelines, as alternatives to vitamin K antagonists, after clinical stability has been reached; however, caution is required in patients with liver or kidney dysfunction. Treatment duration is based on the presence (or absence) and type (transient vs. permanent) of risk factors. This narrative review aims to summarize the latest evidence on SVT, with a particular focus on the anticoagulant treatment in special categories of patients (e.g., liver cirrhosis, solid cancer, myeloproliferative neoplasms, pancreatitis, incidentally detected SVT, Budd-Chiari syndrome, and chronic SVT).

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 2: Treatment, Primary and Secondary Prevention

In most cases, portal vein thrombosis progresses without treatment; spontaneous recanalization of portal vein develops in 42 % of patients with liver cirrhosis. Effective treatment strategies include administration of anticoagulants, interventional procedures such as transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt or endovascular fibrinolysis. Anticoagulant therapy has certain difficulties in patients with liver cirrhosis due to the complex profile of hemostasis, a tendency to both hemorrhages and hypercoagulation. In addition to traditional anticoagulants (heparin preparations, fondaparinux, vitamin K antagonists), direct oral anticoagulants have been widely used in recent years for portal vein thrombosis. Previously, portal vein thrombosis was considered a contraindication to performing transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt, currently the method is often used to restore portal blood flow through the shunt and prevent repeated thrombosis. Endovascular fibrinolysis is still an option for specialized centers for «difficult» patients. In cases of increased risk of venous thromboembolism, patients with liver cirrhosis are recommended to be prevented with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, but further studies should clarify their effectiveness in this aspect. The review highlights data on the features of therapy, primary and secondary prevention of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Despite the existing clinical recommendations for management of patients with cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, the choice of a particular strategy primarily depends on an individualized assessment of risks and benefits of each treatment method.

Enhancement of endothelial function and attenuation of portal vein injury using mesenchymal stem cells carrying miRNA-25-3p

The aims of this study were to determine whether human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) modified by miRNA-25-3p (miR-25-3p) overexpression could promote venous endothelial cell proliferation and attenuate portal endothelial cell injury. HucMSCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were isolated and cultured from human umbilical cord and characterized. Lentiviral vectors expressing miRNA-25-3p were transfected into hucMSCs and confirmed by PCR. We verified the effect of miR-25-3p-modified hucMSCs on HUVEC by cell co-culture and cell supernatant experiments. Subsequently, exosomes of miR-25-3p-modified hucMSCs were isolated from cell culture supernatants and characterized by WB, NTA and TEM. We verified the effects of miR-25-3p-modified exosomes derived from hucMSCs on HUVEC proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis by in vitro cellular function experiments. Meanwhile, we further examined the downstream target genes and signaling pathways potentially affected by miR-25-3p-modified hucMSC-derived exosomes in HUVEC. Finally, we established a rat portal vein venous thrombosis model by injecting CM-DiR-labeled hucMSCs intravenously into rats and examining the homing of cells in the portal vein by fluorescence microscopy. Histological and immunohistochemical experiments were used to examine the effects of miRNA-25-3p-modified hucMSCs on the proliferation and damage of portal vein endothelial cells. Primary hucMSCs and HUVECs were successfully isolated, cultured and characterized. Primary hucMSCs were modified with a lentiviral vector carrying miR-25-3p at MOI 80. Co-culture and cell supernatant intervention experiments showed that overexpression of miRNA-25-3p in hucMSCs enhanced HUVEC proliferation, migration and tube formation in vitro. We successfully isolated and characterized exosomes of miR-25-3p-modified hucMSCs, and exosome intervention experiments demonstrated that miR-25-3p-modified exosomes derived from hucMSCs similarly enhanced the proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis of HUVECs. Subsequent PCR and WB analyses indicated PTEN/KLF4/AKT/ERK1/2 as potential pathways of action. Analysis in a rat portal vein thrombosis model showed that miR-25-3p-modified hucMSCs could homing to damaged portal veins. Subsequent histological and immunohistochemical examinations demonstrated that intervention with miR-25-3p overexpression-modified hucMSCs significantly reduced damage and attenuated thrombosis in rat portal veins. The above findings indicate suggest that hucMSCs based on miR-25-3p modification may be a promising therapeutic approach for use in venous thrombotic diseases.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis. Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinic, Diag-nosis, Impact on Prognosis

   Portal vein thrombosis is the most common thrombotic complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in cases of severe forms. The pathogenesis is multifactorial in nature, it determined by a change in the balance between the coagulation and anticoagulation systems. Thrombosis is often asymptomatic and is accidentally detected, although it can be complicated by varicose bleeding, intestinal ischemia, and portal biliopathy. Ultrasound Doppler examination is a screening method, as an alternative, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are used. The review highlights data on epidemiology, risk factors, clinical features, and diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. The data on the effect of portal vein thrombosis on the progression of liver cirrhosis and the survival of patients, including after liver transplantation, are presented.

Analysis of Related Influencing Factors of Portal Vein Thrombosis After Hepatectomy

Purpose: To analyze the related factors of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after hepatectomy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made on 1029 patients who underwent partial hepatectomy in the first affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from March 2018 to March 2023, including PVT group (n = 24) and non-PVT group (n = 1005). The general and clinical data of the two groups were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the clinical information of the two groups. Result: The proportion of preoperative hepatitis B, liver cirrhosis, ascites, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative hemostatic drugs, preoperative prothrombin time, intraoperative portal occlusion time, operation time, international standardized ratio of prothrombin time on the first day after operation, D-dimer on the first day after operation, fibrin degradation products on the first day after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the PVT group were all higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The preoperative platelet and albumin in the PVT group were lower than those in the control group. Intraoperative blood transfusion, liver cirrhosis, ascites, international standardized ratio of postoperative prothrombin time, postoperative fibrin degradation products, hilar occlusion time and albumin were independent risk factors for PVT. Conclusion: There are many influencing factors of PVT after hepatectomy. Clinical intervention should be taken to reduce PVT. Clinical Registration Number: K2023-348.

Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of benign vs. malignant portal vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma - A systematic review a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

Patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can develop both benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Characterising the nature of PVT is important for planning an optimal therapeutic strategy. In the absence of typical findings or contraindications to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could help in this differentiation. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of CEUS for characterising PVT in patients with HCC.

METHODS

Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 December 2022 for studies analysing the role of CEUS in the differentiation of benign and malignant PVT in HCC. Using the bivariate random effect model, pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was plotted.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with data from 712 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of tumour in vein were 97.0% (95% CI: 93.0-98.7) and 96.8% (95% CI: 92.1-98.7), respectively, without significant heterogeneity. A sROC curve was plotted, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00). Despite the presence of publication bias, sensitivity analysis did not show any change in sensitivity and specificity.

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis summarises the accuracy data from 12 studies, including >700 subjects. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound had excellent diagnostic accuracy with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 97.5% (95% CI: 93.5-99.1) and 98.2% (95% CI: 91.5-99.6), respectively, without any significant heterogeneity. Additionally, the pooled positive LR, negative LR and DOR were 54.6 (95% CI: 11.1-25.6), 0.02 (0.01-0.07) and 2186.8 (318.3-15022.2), respectively. A positive result increases the pretest probability of malignant PVT from 50% to 98%, whereas a negative result decreases it from 50% to 2%. Most of the studies included in our meta-analysis used identical techniques and 6-12-month follow-up scans to check for thrombus progression or regression. Our analysis showed no significant heterogeneity in the studies, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% CI was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.99-1.00). This critical meta-analysis thus propels CEUS to the forefront for differentiating benign from tumoural PVT and suggests routinely using CEUS in patients presenting with HCC and evidence of thrombus on greyscale ultrasound.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an effective diagnostic modality differentiation of benign and malignant PVT in patients with HCC and can be an alternative modality to CT or MRI. Further studies are required to study the role of CEUS as initial diagnostic modality for the characterisation of PVT in HCC.

Exploring the Molecular Aspects of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Associated with Unusual Site Vein Thrombosis: Review of the Literature and Latest Insights

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are the leading causes of unusual site thrombosis, affecting nearly 40% of individuals with conditions like Budd-Chiari syndrome or portal vein thrombosis. Diagnosing MPNs in these cases is challenging because common indicators, such as spleen enlargement and elevated blood cell counts, can be obscured by portal hypertension or bleeding issues. Recent advancements in diagnostic tools have enhanced the accuracy of MPN diagnosis and classification. While bone marrow biopsies remain significant diagnostic criteria, molecular markers now play a pivotal role in both diagnosis and prognosis assessment. Hence, it is essential to initiate the diagnostic process for splanchnic vein thrombosis with a JAK2 V617F mutation screening, but a comprehensive approach is necessary. A multidisciplinary strategy is vital to accurately determine the specific subtype of MPNs, recommend additional tests, and propose the most effective treatment plan. Establishing specialized care pathways for patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis and underlying MPNs is crucial to tailor management approaches that reduce the risk of hematological outcomes and hepatic complications.

Update on the Pharmacological Actions of Enoxaparin in Nonsurgical Patients

Low-molecular-weight heparins are a class of drugs derived from the enzymatic depolymerization of unfractionated heparin that includes enoxaparin. Several studies have been performed on enoxaparin in recent years, in particular for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Furthermore, the use of enoxaparin has been extended to other clinical situations that require antithrombotic pharmacological prevention, such as hemodialysis and recurrent abortion. In this review, we report the main clinical experiences of using enoxaparin in the prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients.

Natural history of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Progression of liver disease in cirrhosis is associated with an increased incidence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis. However, evidence suggests that spontaneous recanalization of PVT may occur even without anti-thrombotic therapy. Thus, the present meta-analysis was conducted to study the natural history of PVT in cirrhosis, facilitating decisions regarding anticoagulation.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched from 2000 to August 2022 for studies reporting the outcome of PVT in cirrhotics without anticoagulation. The pooled proportions with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies (n = 1441) were included in the final analysis. Progression of PVT on follow-up was seen in 22.2% (95% CI 16.1-28.4), while 77.7% (95% CI 71.6-83.9) remained non-progressive (improved or stable). The most common outcome was a stable PVT with a pooled event rate of 44.6% (95% CI 34.4-54.7). The pooled rates of regression and complete recanalization of PVT in cirrhotics were 29.3% (95% CI 20.9-37.7) and 10.4% (95% CI 5.0-15.8), respectively. On follow-up after improvement, pooled recurrence rate of PVT was 24.0% (95% CI 14.7-33.4). MELD score, and presence of ascites had a negative association, while a longer follow-up duration had positive association with PVT regression.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 25% of the cases of PVT in cirrhosis are progressive, 30% cases improve, and 45% remain stable. Future studies are needed to analyze the predictors of spontaneous regression.

Prothrombotic states in portal vein thrombosis and Budd-Chiari syndrome in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Both Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) have been linked to various prothrombotic (PT) conditions. The PT profile in Asians is different from the west and there are no nationwide epidemiological surveys from India. Hence, the present meta-analysis was aimed at analyzing the prevalence of acquired and hereditary thrombophilia among Indian patients with non-cirrhotic PVT and BCS.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of Embase, Medline and Scopus was conducted from January 2000 to February 2022 for studies evaluating the prevalence of various PT conditions in Indian patients with PVT and BCS. Pooled prevalence rates across studies were expressed with summative statistics.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies with 1005 PVT patients and 1391 BCS patients were included in the meta-analysis. At least one PT condition was seen in 46.2% (28.7-63.7) of the PVT patients and 44.9% (37.3-60.7) of the BCS patients. Multiple PT conditions were seen in 13.0% (4.2-21.8) of the PVT patients and 7.9% (3.5-12.4) of the BCS patients. Among PVT patients, hyperhomocysteinemia was the commonest prothrombotic condition (21.6%) followed by protein C (PC) deficiency (10.7%), Janus kinase 2 (JAK-2) mutation (8.5%) and antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) (7.5%). Among patients with BCS, PC deficiency was the commonest prothrombotic condition (10.6%) followed by methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation (9.8%), APLA (9.7%) and JAK-2 mutation (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

The PT profile in Indian patients with abdominal vein thrombosis is different from that of the western data with a lower prevalence of PT conditions in patients with BCS.

Assessment of portal system hemodynamics for the prediction of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in cirrhosis is multifactorial, with altered hemodynamics being proposed as a possible contributor. The present systematic review was conducted to study the role of assessment of portal hemodynamics for the prediction of PVT in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Scopus) were searched from inception to February 2023 for studies comparing portal venous system parameters in patients with cirrhosis developing PVT with those not. Results were presented as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies (patients with cirrhosis: 19 studies, patients with cirrhosis undergoing splenectomy: 12 studies) were included. On pooling the data from multivariable analyses of the included studies, a larger portal vein diameter was a significant predictor of PVT in patients with cirrhosis without or with splenectomy with OR 1.74 (1.12-2.69) and OR 1.55 (1.26-1.92), respectively. On the other hand, a lower portal vein velocity (PVV) was a significant predictor of PVT in cirrhotics without or with splenectomy with OR 0.93 (0.91-0.96) and OR 0.71 (0.61-0.83), respectively. A PVV of <15 cm/s was the most commonly used cut-off for the prediction of PVT. Patients developing PVT also had a significantly higher splenic length, thickness, and splenic vein velocity.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of portal hemodynamic parameters at baseline evaluation in patients with cirrhosis may predict the development of PVT. Further studies are required to determine the optimal cut-offs for various parameters.

Outcome of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Portal hypertension in cirrhosis brings about a complex interplay in the risks of bleeding and thrombosis. It is unclear whether hospitalized patients with cirrhosis need pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE), as it may increase the risk of bleeding. We aimed to compare the outcome of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis with and without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of three databases was conducted from inception to August 2022 for studies comparing the outcome of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis with and without pharmacological prophylaxis for VTE. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of VTE or bleeding.

RESULTS

Overall, 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled incidence of VTE in patients with and without thromboprophylaxis was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.8-2.9) and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.9-2.9), respectively. The odds of VTE were comparable between the groups with OR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.76-1.62). The pooled incidence of bleeding events in patients with and without thromboprophylaxis was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.6-9.8) and 10.4% (95% CI: 6.6-14.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in the odds of overall bleeding (OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.30-1.52) or major bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.55-2.56) between the groups. There was no significant difference in the relative effects on sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

The present analysis could not demonstrate the benefit of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in reducing in-hospital VTE in patients with cirrhosis. Future studies are required to assess the role of risk prediction models in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.

Anticoagulation for the Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Background

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) leads to significant morbidity and mortality burden in patients with cirrhosis. An improved understanding of the utility of anticoagulation in patients with PVT will aid clinical decision making and inform future research. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between anticoagulation therapy and clinical outcomes in the context of treatment for PVT in cirrhosis.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 13, 2022, for studies comparing the use of anticoagulation to other modalities as treatment for PVT in cirrhosis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random-effects model for PVT improvement, recanalization, progression, bleeding events, and all-cause mortality in treatment studies.

Results

We identified 944 records, of which 16 studies (n = 1126) examining anticoagulation as PVT treatment were included for subsequent analysis. Anticoagulation as PVT treatment was associated with PVT improvement (OR 3.64; 95% CI 2.56-5.17), PVT recanalization (OR 3.73; 95% CI 2.45-5.68), decreased PVT progression (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.23-0.63), and decreased all-cause mortality (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29-0.75). The use of anticoagulation was not associated with bleeding events (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.39-1.66). All analyses demonstrated low heterogeneity.

Conclusions

These results support the use of anticoagulation in cirrhosis as treatment for PVT. These findings may inform the clinical management of PVT and highlight the need for further studies such as large randomized controlled trials characterizing the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation for PVT in cirrhosis.

Outcomes of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Smokers With and Without Cirrhosis and Predictors of Mortality: A Nationwide Assessment

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare condition that can lead to numerous complications, like variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, and chronic liver disease. PVT has various etiologies, including liver disease, infections, and hyper-coagulable disorders. Cirrhosis, a chronic progressive liver condition characterized by liver fibrosis, is one of the risk factors for the development of PVT. Secondly, smoking also increases the risk of PVT. The aim of this study is to identify outcomes in patients with PVT who smoked with and without cirrhosis. This study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. The study identified 33,314 patients diagnosed with PVT who smoked, of which 14,991 had cirrhosis, and 18,323 did not have cirrhosis. Patients with PVT and cirrhosis had significantly higher in-hospital mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeds, acute kidney injury, and peritonitis compared to patients without cirrhosis. The results of the study show that patients with PVT and cirrhosis who smoke have a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes.

Shedding Light on the Pathogenesis of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis

Splanchnic vein thrombosis is a rare but potentially life-threatening manifestation of venous thromboembolism, with challenging implications both at the pathological and therapeutic level. It is frequently associated with liver cirrhosis, but it could also be provoked by myeloproliferative disorders, cancer of various gastroenterological origin, abdominal infections and thrombophilia. A portion of splanchnic vein thrombosis is still classified as idiopathic. Here, we review the mechanisms of splanchnic vein thrombosis, including new insights on the role of clonal hematopoiesis in idiopathic SVT pathogenesis, with important implications from the therapeutic standpoint.

Portal Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of Cirrhosis: A Comprehensive Review

Portal vein thrombosis constitutes the most common thrombotic event in patients with cirrhosis, with increased rates in the setting of advanced liver disease. Despite being a well-known complication of cirrhosis, the contribution of portal vein thrombosis to hepatic decompensation and overall mortality is still a matter of debate. The incorporation of direct oral anticoagulants and new radiological techniques for portal vein recanalization have expanded our therapeutic arsenal. However, the lack of large prospective observational studies and randomized trials explain the heterogenous diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of current guidelines. This article seeks to make a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Overview of Complications in Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cirrhosis is the outcome of chronic liver disease of any etiology due to progressive liver injury and fibrosis. Consequently, cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and liver dysfunction, progressing to complications like ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, sarcopenia, hepatocellular carcinoma, and coagulation disorders. End-stage liver disease leads to an impaired quality of life, loss of social and economic productivity, and reduced survival.

METHODS

This narrative review explains the pathophysiology of complications of cirrhosis, the diagnostic approach and innovative management, with focus on data from India. A comprehensive literature search of the published data was performed in regard with the spectrum, diagnosis, and management of cirrhosis and its complications.

RESULTS

There is a change in the epidemiology of metabolic syndrome, lifestyle diseases, alcohol consumption and the spectrum of etiological diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis. With the advent of universal vaccination and efficacious long-term viral suppression agents for chronic hepatitis B, availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C, and a booming liver transplantation programme across the country, the management of complications is essential. There are several updates in the standard of care in the management of complications of cirrhosis, such as hepatorenal syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatic encephalopathy, and new therapies that address supportive and palliative care in advanced cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Prevention, early diagnosis, appropriate management of complications, timely transplantation are cornerstones in the management protocol of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. India needs improved access to care, outreach of public health programmes for viral hepatitis care, health infrastructure, and disease registries for improved healthcare outcomes. Low-cost initiatives like immunization, alcohol cessation, awareness about liver diseases, viral hepatitis elimination, and patient focused decision-making algorithms are essential to manage liver disease in India.