Surgical Risk Assessment in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases

Ascites in patients with end-stage renal disease: Challenges and solutions from diagnosis to management

Metabolic diseases have exponentially increased in recent years, which has led to an increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and concomitant kidney diseases. Ascites are a common presentation of cirrhosis, and renal impairment in cirrhosis is well described. However, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may also present with ascites even in the absence of cirrhosis. The literature on the management of patients with ESRD with ascites with or without concomitant cirrhosis is limited. Massive ascites in this population are often refractory to medical therapy and are associated with dismal prognosis. Pathophysiologically, increased hepatic vein hydrostatic pressure, fluid retention, increased peritoneal membrane permeability, and impaired peritoneal lymphatic drainage are proposed mechanisms for ascites in ESRD without cirrhosis. Identifying underlying cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PH) has therapeutic implications in such patients. However, diagnostic tools such as serum ascites albumin gradient and noninvasive tests to identify cirrhosis have limited utility in ESRD. Hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis are effective but can be associated with hemodynamic compromise and peritonitis, especially in those with PH. TIPS for ascites has a limited role in the presence of ESRD due to the increased risk of HE. Kidney transplant is the treatment of choice in ESRD with ascites without PH. Simultaneous liver-kidney transplant remains the definitive treatment in the presence of PH, but is less commonly feasible, and kidney transplant alone in the presence of PH can be associated with the risk of decompensations. This review discusses the approach and management of ascites in chronic kidney disease and ESRD specifically.

Anaesthesia evaluation and perioperative strategies in liver disease patients with cardiohepatic syndrome

Cardiohepatic syndrome (CHS) presents a significant challenge in perioperative management due to the complex interaction between liver and heart dysfunction. CHS, analogous to cardiorenal syndrome, encompasses various conditions where hepatic and cardiovascular pathologies exacerbate one another. Patients with chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, or heart failure often exhibit increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, necessitating tailored anesthetic strategies. A comprehensive understanding of CHS pathophysiology is crucial, as it informs risk assessment and guides perioperative management. Risk stratification tools such as the Child-Pugh and MELD scores are commonly used, but they have limitations in fully capturing perioperative risks. The updated STS 2024 model includes liver-specific parameters, improving risk prediction in cardiac surgeries. Additionally, the VOCAL-Penn score addresses gaps in traditional risk models, providing a more accurate assessment for patients with advanced liver disease. Perioperative management focuses on minimizing hemodynamic stress and avoiding drugs metabolized by the liver. Agents like Remifentanil, Atracurium, and Esmolol are preferred for their minimal hepatic metabolism. Vasopressors such as terlipressin and vasopressin, which target the splanchnic circulation, improve hemodynamics in these patients. Within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) framework, optimizing nutrition and fluid management is essential for reducing perioperative complications. Effective management of patients with CHS requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates comprehensive risk assessment and individualized anesthetic strategies. This approach improves outcomes by reducing perioperative complications and mortality in this high-risk population.

Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block With Monitored Anesthesia Care for Necrotic Umbilical Hernia Repair in a Patient With Severe Liver Failure and Refractory Ascites: A Case Report

Patients with severe liver dysfunction present significant perioperative challenges, including the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE), after general anesthesia. While avoiding general anesthesia and deep sedation is crucial for early recovery in this patient population, neuraxial block techniques are often contraindicated due to coagulation disorders. A 73-year-old male patient (190 cm tall, weighing 77 kg) with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis (score 10), coagulopathy (platelets 90,000/μL, prothrombin time (PT) activity 47%), and complex medical history, including treated hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cancer, and bladder cancer, underwent necrotic umbilical hernia repair. The patient, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status IV with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of 19, had been hospitalized for two months due to an umbilical hernia infection refractory to antibiotic therapy. After careful preoperative assessment, we selected monitored anesthesia care (MAC) as the preferred anesthetic approach due to the patient's high surgical risk. We performed a bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) using diluted ropivacaine (0.15%, total 80 mL) with epinephrine (15 μg). Sedation was achieved using dexmedetomidine without a loading dose, supplemented with midazolam and low-dose remifentanil. This approach allowed us to maintain spontaneous breathing while providing adequate analgesia and patient comfort. The surgery was completed successfully with stable hemodynamics and respiratory functions. Throughout the procedure, hemodynamic parameters remained within 20% of baseline values, and bispectral index (BIS) values were maintained between 65 and 80, indicating appropriate sedation depth without excessive anesthetic administration. Ultrasound-guided RSB combined with carefully titrated MAC provides safe and effective anesthesia for umbilical hernia repair in patients with severe liver dysfunction. This approach maintains spontaneous breathing, delivers effective analgesia for somatic and visceral pain, and facilitates clearer differentiation between residual anesthetic effects and worsening HE postoperatively. When coagulopathy precludes neuraxial techniques, this pharmacokinetically informed strategy offers a valuable alternative for high-risk abdominal wall procedures.

Cardiovascular disease assessment and management in liver transplantation

The prevalence and mortality related to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) continue to rise globally. Liver transplant (LT) recipients continue to be older and have inherently more comorbidities. Among these, cardiac disease is one of the three main causes of morbidity and mortality after LT. Several reasons exist including the high prevalence of associated risk factors, which can also be attributed to the rise in the proportion of patients undergoing LT for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additionally, as people age, the prevalence of now treatable cardiac conditions, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathies, significant valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, and arrhythmias rises, making the need to treat these conditions critical to optimize outcomes. There is an emerging body of literature regarding CAD screening in patients with ESLD, however, there is a paucity of strong evidence to support the guidance regarding the management of cardiac conditions in the pre-LT and perioperative settings. This has resulted in significant variations in assessment strategies and clinical management of cardiac disease in LT candidates between transplant centres, which impacts LT candidacy based on a transplant centre's risk tolerance and comfort level for caring for patients with concomitant cardiac disease. Performing a comprehensive assessment and understanding the potential approaches to the management of ESLD patients with cardiac conditions may increase the acceptance of patients, who appear too complex, but rather require extra evaluation and may be reasonable candidates for LT. The unique physiology of ESLD can profoundly influence preoperative assessment, perioperative management, and outcomes associated with underlying cardiac pathology, and requires a thoughtful multidisciplinary approach. The strategies proposed in this manuscript attempt to review the latest expert experience and opinions and provide guidance to practicing clinicians who assess and treat patients being considered for LT. These topics also highlight the gaps that exist in the comprehensive care of LT patients and the need for future investigations in this field.

Position paper on perioperative management and surgical risk in the patient with cirrhosis

INTRODUCTION

Management of the patient with cirrhosis of the liver that requires surgical treatment has been relatively unexplored. In Mexico, there is currently no formal stance or expert recommendations to guide clinical decision-making in this context.

AIMS

The present position paper reviews the existing evidence on risks, prognoses, precautions, special care, and specific management or procedures for patients with cirrhosis that require surgical interventions or invasive procedures. Our aim is to provide recommendations by an expert panel, based on the best published evidence, and consequently ensure timely, quality, efficient, and low-risk care for this specific group of patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven recommendations were developed that address preoperative considerations, intraoperative settings, and postoperative follow-up and care.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment and care of patients with cirrhosis that require major surgical or invasive procedures should be overseen by a multidisciplinary team that includes the anesthesiologist, hepatologist, gastroenterologist, and clinical nutritionist. With respect to decompensated patients, a nephrology specialist may be required, given that kidney function is also a parameter involved in the prognosis of these patients.

Colorectal Surgery in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis poses a significant challenge due to the associated peri-operative morbidity and mortality risks. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the outcomes in this cohort of patients following colorectal surgery.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases and references were searched up to October 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines. The data collated included: patient demographics, pathology or type of colorectal operation performed, severity of liver cirrhosis, post-operative complication rates, mortality rates and prognostic factors. A quality assessment of included studies was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies reporting the outcomes of colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis were identified, including the results of 8646 patients. The indications, pathologies and/or type of operations varied. The overall complication rate ranged from 29 to 75%, minor complication ranged 14.5-37% and major complication ranged 6.7-59.3%. The mortality rates ranged from 0 to 37%.

CONCLUSION

Colorectal surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis still carries considerable morbidity and mortality rates. This group of patients needs to be managed in a multidisciplinary setting to achieve excellent outcomes. Future research should focus on uniform definitions to enable interpretable outcomes.

Anesthesia in patients with chronic liver disease: An updated review

Anesthesia in chronic liver disease patients can be challenging because of the medications given or interventions performed and their effects on liver physiology. Also, the effects of liver disease on coagulation and metabolism should be considered carefully. This review focuses on anesthesia in patients with different chronic liver disease stages. A literature search was performed for Scopus and PubMed databases for articles discussing different types of anesthesia in patients with chronic liver disease, their safety, usage, and risks. The choice of anesthesia is of crucial importance. Regional anesthesia, especially neuroaxial anesthesia, may benefit some patients with liver disease, but coagulopathy should be considered. Regional anesthesia provides optimum intraoperative relaxation and analgesia that extends to the postoperative period while avoiding the side effects of intravenous anesthetics and opioids. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of anesthetic medications must guard against complications related to overdose or decreased metabolism. The choice of anesthesia in chronic liver disease patients is crucial and could be tailored according to the degree of liver compensation and the magnitude of the surgical procedure.

Increased preoperative aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index predicts complications following total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

This study investigates the association between aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), a noninvasive measure of liver function, and 30-day postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent TSA between 2015 and 2021. The study population was divided into 4 groups based on preoperative APRI: normal/reference (APRI ≤ 0.5), mild fibrosis (0.5 < APRI ≤ 0.7), significant fibrosis (0.7 < APRI ≤ 1), and cirrhosis (APRI > 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the connection between preoperative APRI and postoperative complications.

Results

Compared to the reference group, significant fibrosis was independently associated with a greater likelihood of major complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.99; P = .017), minor complications (OR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.67-4.37; P < .001), pneumonia (OR: 5.78, 95% CI: 2.58-12.95; P < .001), blood transfusions (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.57-5.32; P < .001), readmission (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21; P = .022), and non-home discharge (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.23-2.73; P = .003). Cirrhosis was independently associated with a greater likelihood of minor complications (OR: 3.96, 95% CI: 2.67-5.88; P < .001), blood transfusions (OR: 5.85, 95% CI: 3.79-9.03; P < .001), failure to wean off a ventilator (OR: 9.10, 95% CI: 1.98-41.82; P = .005), and non-home discharge (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.43-2.96; P < .001).

Conclusion

Increasing preoperative APRI was associated with an increasing rate of postoperative complications following TSA.

New Indications for TIPSs: What Do We Know So Far?

Since 1988, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been an effective therapy for portal hypertension in many settings. Thanks to continuous technical improvements and a wiser selection of patients, excellent results have been achieved with this therapeutic strategy. The historical indications for TIPS placement, in the context of liver cirrhosis, such as refractory ascites and variceal bleeding are now well established and known. However, in recent years, new indications are emerging. These have been investigated and approved in some studies but are not yet included in guidelines and clinical practice. This review aims to highlight what is new for the role of TIPS in portal vein thrombosis (especially in patients awaiting liver transplantation), in recurrent ascites and not only refractory ascites, as a neoadjuvant therapy before abdominal surgery and, finally, in the setting of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. All these new aspects are addressed in this review with a critical approach based on the literature revision and clinical practice. Future research is needed to explore and validate the new role of TIPS in these scenarios.