Effect of remimazolam vs propofol on emergence from general anesthesia in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures: A randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the time to emergence from general anesthesia with remimazolam versus propofol in patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

An academic hospital.

PATIENTS

Adult patients scheduled for cerebral endovascular procedures.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo surgery under general anesthesia with remimazolam (0.1 mg kg-1 for induction and 0.3-0.7 mg kg-1 h-1 for maintenance) or propofol (1-1.5 mg kg-1 for induction and 4-10 mg kg-1 h-1 for maintenance).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the time to emergence from anesthesia. The non-inferiority margin was -2.55 min in group difference. Major secondary outcomes included hypotension during induction, incidence of postoperative delirium and Modified Rankin Scale (mRs) at 30 days and 90 days after surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 142 randomized patients, 129 completed the trial. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the mean time to emergence from anesthesia was 16.1 [10.4] min in the remimazolam group vs. 19.0 [11.2] min in the propofol group. The group difference was -2.9 min [95% CI -6.5, 0.7] (P = 0.003 for non-inferiority). The remimazolam group had lower rate of hypotension during induction (11.3% vs 25.4%, P = 0.03) and use of vasopressors during surgery (29.6% vs 62.0%, P < 0.001). The two groups did not differ in postoperative delirium and mRs at 30 and 90 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing cerebral endovascular procedures, remimazolam did not increase the time from anesthesia vs propofol.

Remimazolam Attenuates LPS-Derived Cognitive Dysfunction via Subdiaphragmatic Vagus Nerve Target α7nAChR-Mediated Nrf2/HO-1 Signal Pathway

Sepsis-induced neuroinflammation is significantly associated with sepsis-related brain dysfunction. Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine anesthetic with multiple organ protective effects. However, it is unknown whether remimazolam can ameliorate LPS-induced brain impairment. In this study, Lipopolysaccharide (5 mg/kg, LPS) severely impaired Sprague-Dawley rats spatial learning ability, memory, and cognitive function. However, remimazolam treatment showed a protective effect on LPS-induced cognitive dysfunction. Remimazolam partly reversed LPS-induced splenomegaly, decreased serum cytokine expression, suppressed hippocampal M1 microglial activation, and mitigated oxidative stress injury and neuroinflammation. Electroacupuncture (EA) or PNU282987 treatment improved LPS-induced cognitive dysfunction and also significantly inhibited neuroinflammation and systemic inflammation. However, MLA, ML385, or subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve (SDV) treatment abolished the protective effects of remimazolam. Further mechanistic studies showed that remimazolam induces protective effects by activating subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve target α7nAChR-mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. These results demonstrate that remimazolam can up-regulate α7nAChR, Cyto-Nrf2, HO-1, and cognitive-related (CREB, BDNF, PSD95) protein expressions, suppress M1 microglia, ameliorate neuroinflammation or systemic inflammation, and reverse cognitive dysfunction. Therefore, this study provides insight into a new therapeutic target for the treatment of sepsis-induced cerebral dysfunction.

Effect of converting from propofol to remimazolam with flumazenil reversal on recovery from anesthesia in outpatients with mental disabilities: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia is often necessary for dental treatment of outpatients with mental disabilities. Rapid recovery and effective management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are critical for outpatients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of transitioning from propofol to remimazolam with flumazenil reversal administered toward the end of surgery during propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on recovery.

METHODS

Adults with mental disabilities scheduled to undergo dental treatment were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-based TIVA (Group P) or propofol-remimazolam-based TIVA with flumazenil reversal (Group PR). Propofol was replaced with remimazolam 1 h before the end of surgery in Group PR; moreover, 0.5 mg of flumazenil was administered after the neuromuscular blockade reversal agent. The primary outcome was the duration of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The secondary outcomes included time to eye-opening, time to extubation, occurrence of PONV, and quality of recovery.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The duration of stay in the PACU in Group PR was significantly shorter than that in Group P (mean difference, 8.7 min; confidence interval [95% CI], 3.3-14.2; P = 0.002). Group PR exhibited a shorter time to eye opening (mean difference, 5.4 min; 95% CI, 3.3-8.1; P < 0.001) and time to extubation (mean difference, 5.5 min; 95% CI, 3.6-7.9; P < 0.001) than Group P. Neither group required the administration of rescue analgesics, and the incidence of PONV was not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Transitioning from propofol to remimazolam 1 h before the end of surgery followed by flumazenil reversal reduced the duration of stay in the PACU and the time to eye opening and extubation without affecting the incidence of PONV and quality of recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0007794), Clinical trial first registration date: 12/10/2022.

Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia in a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia: a case report

BACKGROUND

Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare, life-threatening disorder of calcium homeostasis in skeletal muscle cells that is triggered by volatile anesthetics and succinylcholine, leading to a hypermetabolic reaction. The pathogenic ryanodine receptor 1 (RYR1) gene variant is critical. Patients susceptible to MH should avoid triggering agents, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is preferred. Remimazolam is safe in patients with suspected MH.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the first case of remimazolam treatment in a genetically confirmed patient with MH without MH development. A 72-year-old man with a family history of MH underwent remimazolam-based TIVA. After informed consent was obtained, a muscle biopsy and genetic testing were performed. Intraoperatively and postoperatively, the patient exhibited no signs of MH. An enhanced function of the RYR1 channel into releasing calcium was indicated, and the genetic testing revealed a pathogenic variant of RYR1.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam-based TIVA is safe in patients confirming the diagnosis of MH.

The incidences of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia with remimazolam versus sevoflurane: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) refers to nausea and vomiting that occurs within 24-h after surgery or in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Previous studies have reported that the use of remimazolam, a newer benzodiazepine (BDZ) hypnotic, for anesthesia results in less PONV. In this study, we compared the rate of PONV between sevoflurane and remimazolam after general anesthesia.

Methods

In this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT), participants aged 20-80 years who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy or hemicolectomy were randomized to either the remimazolam or sevoflurane group. The primary outcome was PONV incidence for 24-h after surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised of PONV at 30-min post-surgery, postoperative additional antiemetic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) score at 24-h postoperatively.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled in the study. The remimazolam group exhibited significantly lower rates of PONV for 24-h after surgery than did the sevoflurane group (remimazolam group vs. sevoflurane group; 5% vs. 45%, P = 0.003, respectively). The use of dexamethasone, a rescue antiemetic administered within 24 h of surgery, was substantially lower in the remimazolam group than in the sevoflurane group (0% in remimazolam vs. 30% in sevoflurane, P = 0.020). The QOR-15 score at 24-h after surgery showed no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions

Compared to sevoflurane, opting for remimazolam as an intraoperative hypnotic may decrease the incidence of PONV and reduce antiemetic use for 24 h after laparoscopic surgery.

Exploring the Utility of remimazolam in cesarean sections under general anesthesia: A preliminary retrospective analysis and Implications for future study

Background

Remimazolam has recently been introduced as a maintenance agent for general anesthesia. However, the effect of remimazolam on peripartum prognosis has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol for uterotonic drugs following cesarean section.

Methods

The electronic medical records of 51 adult women who underwent elective cesarean sections by single obstetrician under general anesthesia were collected. Participants were categorized into two groups: the propofol group and the remimazolam group. General anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of propofol or remimazolam after delivery. The number of uterotonic drugs administered during the cesarean section, the estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of hospital stay (LOS) after delivery were assessed.

Results

Of the 51 patients included in the study, 35 were in the propofol group and 16 in the remimazolam group. In the remimazolam group, five patients (31.3%, 5/16) received more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Conversely, in the propofol group, 19 patients (54.3%, 19/35) were injected with more uterotonics than the standard regimen. Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal positioning of the placenta (P = 0.079) and not using remimazolam (P = 0.100) were the most relevant factors associated with the increased use of uterotonics. There was no significant difference in EBL between the two groups. The use of remimazolam was clinically relevant with a shorter LOS (P = 0.059).

Conclusions

The use of remimazolam as a maintenance agent did not result in significantly higher use of intrapartum uterotonics compared to the use of propofol. These results cannot exclude all adverse effects of remimazolam during cesarean delivery. Further randomized controlled trials must be conducted to obtain high-quality evidence.

Comparison between remimazolam and propofol anaesthesia for interventional neuroradiology: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

General anaesthesia can immobile patients during interventional neuroradiology to improve image quality. Remimazolam, an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, is advantageous for haemodynamic stability. This study compared remimazolam and propofol anaesthesia during neuroradiology procedures regarding intraoperative hypotensive events and rapid recovery.

METHODS

This single-masked randomised-controlled study included 76 participants who underwent elective endovascular embolisation in a single centre. Patients were randomised between a continuous remimazolam infusion (n = 38) or a target-controlled propofol infusion group (n = 38). In the remimazolam group, flumazenil (0.2 mg) was administered at the end of the procedure. Phenylephrine was titrated to maintain the mean arterial pressure within ± 20% of the baseline value. The primary outcome was the total phenylephrine dose during the procedure.

RESULTS

The total phenylephrine dose was 0.0 [0.0-30.0] μg in the remimazolam group and 30.0 [0.0-205.0] μg in the propofol group (p = 0.001). Hypotensive events were observed in 11 (28.9%) patients in the remimazolam group and 23 (60.5%) patients in the propofol group (p = 0.001). Recovery times to spontaneous breathing, eye-opening, extubation, and orientation were shorter in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam anaesthesia showed superior haemodynamic stability compared with propofol anaesthesia during neuroradiology procedures. Systematic use of flumazenil enabled rapid recovery from remimazolam anaesthesia.

REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry; Registration number: UMIN000047384; URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000054046.

Remimazolam versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy within elderly patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Propofol has become the sedative of choice for endoscopy and colonoscopy. However, it has shown associations with various adverse effects, specifically in the geriatric population. In contrast, remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine, demonstrating a superior clinical safety profile. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to clarify the efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol in elderly patients (≥ 60 years) undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic and colonoscopy procedures.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were explored from inception till January 7, 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials (RoB-2) was utilized to evaluate the quality of each included study reported in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven randomized control trials were included, resulting in the pooling of 1,466 patients (remimazolam: 731 patients; propofol: 735 patients). Propofol demonstrated a significantly lower time to loss of consciousness (P < 0.00001, 4 studies, 784 patients) and a greater sedation success after first dose (P = 0.05, 5 studies, 1,271 patients). Remimazolam reported a significantly lower risk of bradycardia (P = 0.02, 5 studies, 1,323 patients), hypoxemia (P < 0.00001, 6 studies, 1,389 patients), and pain on injection site (P < 0.00001, 5 studies, 1,184 patients). No statistically significant differences in sedation time, number of supplemental doses, procedural parameters, and other adverse outcomes were reported.

CONCLUSION

As per the results of our analyses, propofol demonstrated comparatively superior efficacy, however, remimazolam demonstrated comparatively superior safety. The debatable evidence generated from this meta-analysis may not currently be powerful enough to advocate for the use of remimazolam in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures; hence, further comprehensive studies are necessary in order to arrive at a robust conclusion.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients

Remimazolam, a novel intravenous anesthetic, has been proven to be safe and efficacious in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. However, reports comparing the effectiveness and safety of using equivalent doses of remimazolam with propofol have not been seen. The aim of this study was to compare the sedation efficacy and safety of the 95% effective doses (ED95) of remimazolam versus propofol combined with sufentanil in the gastroscopy setting among the elderly. In the first step of this two-step study, a modified up-and-down method was used to calculate the ED95 of remimazolam and propofol when combined with 0.1 µg/kg sufentanil in inhibiting body movement of elderly patients undergoing gastroscopy. In the second step, ED95 of both agents calculated in the first step were administered, endpoints of efficacy, safety, and incidence of adverse events were compared. A total of 46 individuals completed the first step. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.163 mg/kg (95% CI 0.160-0.170 mg/kg), and that of propofol was 1.042 mg/kg (95% CI 1.007-1.112 mg/kg). In the second step, 240 patients completed the trial. The anesthetic effective rates of the remimazolam group and the propofol group were 78% and 83%, respectively, with no statistical difference (P = 0.312). Patients in the remimazolam group had more stable circulatory functions (P < 0.0001) and a lower incidence of pain on injection (3.3% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypotension was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (15.6% vs. 39.0%, P < 0.0001). Overall adverse event was low in the remimazolam versus propofol group (21.3% vs. 62.7%, P < 0.0001).In this study, we found that when anesthesia was administered to elderly gastroscopy patients based on 95% effective doses of remimazolam and propofol, remimazolam was as effective as propofol, but was safer with a lower incidence of adverse events.Study registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034234. Registered 29/06/2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn .

Effectiveness of remimazolam in preventing postoperative delirium in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures

PURPOSE

Elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures are known to be a high-risk group for postoperative delirium (POD). The aim of this study was to determine the association of the benzodiazepine drug remimazolam with POD in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective observational study, we included patients aged 65 years or older who underwent general anesthesia for proximal femoral fractures. We collected data for the incidence of POD within 3 days after surgery. We also obtained data for complications, preoperative blood examinations, maintenance anesthetic and intraoperative vital data. The occurrence of POD in patients who received remimazolam for general anesthesia (remimazolam group) was compared to that in patients who received general anesthesia with other anesthetic agents (other group). We finally conducted a multivariate analysis to assess the independent association of remimazolam with the risk of POD.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients, including 54 patients who received remimazolam for maintenance anesthesia, were included in this study. The incidence of POD in the patients was 26.1%. The incidence of delirium within 3 days after surgery was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the other group (14.8% vs. 29.5%, p  =  0.03). The multivariate analysis showed that the use of remimazolam independently reduced the occurrence of POD (adjusted odds ratio  =  0.42, p  =  0.04).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective observational study showed that the use of remimazolam is independently associated with a reduced incidence of POD. Remimazolam may be considered as an option to reduce POD in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures.

The Metabolism of the New Benzodiazepine Remimazolam

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam (RMZ) is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine used for sedation by intravenous administration. The pharmacophore of RMZ includes a carboxyl ester group sensitive to esterase- mediated hydrolysis, which is the primary path of metabolic elimination. However, for the sake of drug safety, a deeper and broader knowledge of the involved metabolic pathways and the evolving metabolites is required. Information is needed on both humans and experimental animals to evaluate the possibility that humans form harmful metabolites not encountered in animal toxicity studies.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed at identifying the mechanisms of remimazolam's metabolism and any potential clinically significant metabolites.

METHOD

Using tissue homogenates from various animals and humans, the liver was identified as the tissue primarily responsible for the elimination of RMZ. CNS7054, the hydrolysis product of remimazolam, was identified as the only clinically relevant metabolite. Using bacterial or eukaryotic over-expression systems, carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) was identified as the iso-enzyme predominantly involved in RMZ metabolism, with no role for carboxylesterase 2. Using a variety of inhibitors of other esterases, the contribution to elimination mediated by esterases other than CES1 was excluded.

RESULTS

Besides tissue carboxylesterases, rodents expressed an RMZ esterase in plasma, which was not present in this compartment in other laboratory animals and humans, hampering direct comparisons. Other pathways of metabolic elimination, such as oxidation and glucuronidation, also occurred, but their contribution to overall elimination was minimal.

CONCLUSION

Besides the pharmacologically non-active metabolite CNS7054, no other clinically significant metabolite of remimazolam could be identified.

Remimazolam for sedation and anesthesia in children: Protocol for a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, a novel intravenous benzodiazepine recently approved by both the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Agency, holds significant promise in clinical practice. Its pharmacodynamic profile closely mirrors that of midazolam, while its pharmacokinetics properties bear resemblance to remifentanil. Research in adult populations continues to accumulate, but the pediatric studies' pace is not significant. This scoping review aims to methodically scrutinize published studies, clinical trials, observational research, case reports, and pertinent literature to offer a comprehensive insight into the existing understanding of remimazolam in pediatric sedation and anesthesia. The synthesis of gathered evidence will discern lacunae in the literature, direct forthcoming investigations, and enlighten clinical practices.

METHODS

The review will adhere to the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) for Scoping Review. A meticulous search strategy will be executed across prominent peer-reviewed databases, with concerted efforts to identify relevant gray literature. All primary investigations involving the administration of remimazolam in pediatric populations will be encompassed within the scope of this review.

RESULTS

The encompassed studies will be elucidated through a narrative synopsis, complemented by descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative data where deemed applicable.

CONCLUSION

The planned scoping review aims to delineate the existing evidence regarding the utilization of remimazolam in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. It will discern areas of knowledge deficiency, provide guidance for future inquiries, and enhance clinical practices within the field.

Minimal alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in combination with remimazolam in adults during laryngeal mask insertion: an up-down sequential allocation study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting intravenous benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic. The combination of remimazolam and sevoflurane does not increase respiratory sensitivity, produce bronchospasm, or cause other adverse conditions. We aimed to observe the effects of different remimazolam doses on the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane at end-expiration during laryngeal mask insertion and evaluate the effect of sex on the efficacy of the combination of remimazolam on the suppression of laryngeal mask insertion in adult patients.

METHODS

We included 240 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia with elective placement of a laryngeal mask (120 males and 120 females). The patients were randomly divided into four groups according to sex: a control group (randomization for female patients, RF0; randomization for male patients, RM0) and three remimazolam groups (RF1, RM1 / RM2, RF2 / RM3, RF3), with 30 patients in each group. Induction was established by vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII), using 8% sevoflurane and 100% oxygen (6 L/min) in all patients. The (RF1, RM1), (RM2, RF2), and (RM3, RF3) groups were continuously injected with remimazolam at doses of 1, 1.5, and 2.0 mg/kg/h, respectively, while the (RM0, RF0) group was injected with an equal volume of normal saline. The end-expiratory concentration of sevoflurane was adjusted to a preset value after the patient's eyelash reflex disappeared. After the end-expiratory concentration of sevoflurane was kept stable for at least 15 min, the laryngeal mask was placed, and the patient's physical response to the mask placement was observed immediately and within 30 s of placement. The MAC of sevoflurane was measured using the up-and-down sequential method of Dixon.

RESULTS

The calculated MAC of end-expiratory sevoflurane during laryngeal mask insertion in adult females was (2.94 ± 0.18)%, (2.69 ± 0.16)%, (2.32 ± 0.16)% and (1.83 ± 0.15)% in groups RF0, RF1, RF2 and RF3; (2.98 ± 0.18)%, (2.80 ± 0.19)%, (2.54 ± 0.15)% and (2.15 ± 0.15)% in male groups RM0, RM1, RM2 and RM3, respectively. The MAC values were significantly lower in the (RF1-RF3, RM1-RM3) group when compared to the (RF0, RM0) group. There was no significant difference between (RF0, RF1) and (RM0, RM1), but the MAC value of the RF2-RF3 group was significantly lower than that of the RM2-RM3 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam can effectively reduce end-expiratory sevoflurane MAC values during laryngeal mask placement in adults. When remimazolam was measured above 1.5 mg/kg/h, the effect of inhibiting laryngeal mask implantation in female patients was stronger than that in male patients. Remimazolam at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/h combined with sevoflurane induction can be safely and effectively used in these patients.

Safety and efficacy comparison of remimazolam and propofol for intravenous anesthesia during gastroenteroscopic surgery of older patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is characterized by rapid action and inactive metabolites. It is used as the general anesthetic for many clinical surgeries. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether remimazolam is superior to propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older patients.

AIM

To compare the adverse events and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during gastroenteroscopy in older adults.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library databases were queried for the relevant key words "remimazolam," "and propofol," "and gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroscopy." The search scope was "Title and Abstract," and the search was limited to human studies and publications in English. Seven studies wherein remimazolam and propofol were compared were included for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We selected seven randomized controlled trials involving 1445 cases for the analysis. Remimazolam reduced the hypotension (relative risk, RR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.29-0.66, P = 0.000), respiratory depression (RR = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.70, P = 0.000), injection pain (RR = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.25, P = 0.000), bradycardia (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.24-0.58, P = 0.000), and time to discharge [weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.58, 95%CI: -0.97 to -0.18, P = 0.005], compared to those after propofol administration. No obvious differences were observed for postoperative nausea and vomiting (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.97-1.24, P = 0.151), dizziness (RR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.43-1.36, P = 0.361), successful sedation rate (RR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93-1.00, P = 0.083), or the time to become fully alert (WMD = 0.00, 95%CI: -1.08-1.08, P = 0.998).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam appears to be safer than propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older adults. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Remimazolam attenuates inflammation and kidney fibrosis following folic acid injury

The transition of acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by intense inflammation and progressive fibrosis. Remimazolam is widely used for procedural sedation in intensive care units, such as AKI patients. Remimazolam has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and organ-protective properties. However, the role of remimazolam in inflammation and renal fibrosis following AKI remains unclear. Here, we explored the effects of remimazolam on the inflammatory response and kidney fibrogenesis of mice subjected to folic acid (FA) injury. Our results showed that remimazolam treatment alleviated kidney damage and dysfunction. Mice treated with remimazolam presented less collagen deposition in FA-injured kidneys compared with FA controls, which was accompanied by a reduction of extracellular matrix proteins accumulation and fibroblasts activation. Furthermore, remimazolam treatment reduced inflammatory cells infiltration into the kidneys of mice with FA injury and inhibited proinflammatory or profibrotic molecules expression. Finally, remimazolam treatment impaired the activation of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts and blunted the transformation of macrophages to myofibroblasts in FA nephropathy. Additionally, the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist PK-11195 partially reversed the protective effect of remimazolam on the FA-injured kidneys. Overall, remimazolam attenuates the inflammatory response and renal fibrosis development following FA-induced AKI, which may be related to the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor pathway.

Predicted effect-site concentrations of remimazolam for i-gel insertion: a prospective randomized controlled study

This study is the first to report 50% and 95% effect-site concentrations (EC50 and EC95, respectively) of the new short-acting benzodiazepine, remimazolam, for the successful insertion of i-gels with co-administration of fentanyl. Thirty patients (38 ± 5 years old, male/female = 4/26) were randomly assigned into five groups to receive one of five different remimazolam doses (0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, and 0.3 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion of 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 mg/kg/h, respectively, for 10 min), which were designed to maintain a constant effect-site concentration of remimazolam at the time of i-gel insertion. At 6 min after the start of remimazolam infusion, all patients received 2 µg/kg fentanyl. i-gel insertion was attempted at 10 min and the success or failure of insertion were assessed by the patient response. Probit analysis was used to estimate the EC50 and EC95 values of remimazolam with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the five remimazolam dose groups, two, two, four, five, and six of the six patients in each group had an i-gel successfully inserted. Two patients in the lowest remimazolam dose group were conscious at the time of i-gel insertion and were counted as failures. The EC50 and EC95 values of remimazolam were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.11) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.09-2.05) µg/ml, respectively. An effect-site concentration of ≥ 1.57 µg/ml was needed to insert an i-gel using remimazolam anesthesia, even with 2 µg/kg fentanyl. Trial registration: The study was registered in Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 19 April 2021, Code jRCTs041210009.

Benefits of remimazolam as an anesthetic sedative for older patients: A review

Owing to the decreased levels of receptors in the peripheral and central nervous systems, the functions of various organ systems decline in older patients. When administering anesthesia to older patients, it is necessary to consider the effects of medication on the homeostatic balance. Remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine, was recently developed as an anesthetic drug that has shown promise in clinical anesthesia application owing to its molecular structure, targets, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Remimazolam exhibits a rapid onset and metabolism, with minor effects on liver and kidney functions. Moreover, the drug has a specific antagonist, flumazenil. It is safer to use in older patients than other anesthetic sedatives and has been widely used since its introduction. Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics, metabolic pathways, effects on target organs, and hemodynamics of different drugs with those of commonly used anesthetic sedative drugs are useful to inform clinical practice. This article elaborates on the benefits of remimazolam compared with those of other anesthetic sedatives for sedation in older patients to demonstrate how it offers a new option for anesthetics in older patients. In cases involving older patients with increased clinical complexities or very old patients requiring anesthesia, remimazolam can be selected as the preferred anesthetic sedative, as outlined in this review.

Application of remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia for flash visual evoked potential monitoring during pituitary adenoma resection: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Flash visual evoked potential (FVEP) is a critical method for monitoring intraoperative visual function during neurosurgery. A new benzodiazepine drug called remimazolam has recently been used for general anesthesia. However, the impact of remimazolam on FVEP remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate how remimazolam, in comparison to propofol, when combined with 0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia, affects the FVEP waveform during pituitary adenoma resection.

METHODS

Overall, 36 patients undergoing pituitary adenoma resection under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P) in a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. For anesthesia induction, a bolus of 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam or 2 mg/kg propofol was intravenously infused for approximately one minute. The anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion of either remimazolam (0.7-1.0 mg/kg/h) or propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h), in combination with 0.6% sevoflurane, aimed at sustaining the bispectral index (BIS) within the range of 40-60. The primary outcome was the N75-P100 amplitude of FVEP recorded at approximately 20 min after intubation (T0). 10% of the amplitude at T0 in group P was defined as the non-inferiority margin (δ). Confidence interval testing was used to evaluate the non-inferiority hypothesis. The secondary outcomes covered the P100 latency of FVEP, electroretinogram (ERG) b wave amplitude, demographic characteristics, hemodynamics, and occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

The BIS index during anesthesia was comparable between the groups at the same measured time points (P > 0.05). The N75-P100 amplitude at T0 in group R was 7.64 ± 1.36 µV, while it was 6.96 ± 0.95 µV in group P (P = 0.09), with a mean difference of 0.68 µV (95% CI, -0.11 µV to 1.48 µV). The δ was set at 0.7 and the lower limit of the 95% CI exceeded the -δ. Both remimazolam and propofol had little effect on ERG b-wave amplitudes. At the designated time points, FVEP amplitude and P100 latency displayed no appreciable variation between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events related to anesthesia, needle electrodes, or surgery between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane is non-inferior to propofol-0.6% sevoflurane for general anesthesia, based on the FVEP N75-P100 amplitude. The electrophysiological data obtained in both groups indicate that reproducible and stable FVEP and ERG waveforms can be acquired at set time points. Therefore, for reliable FVEP monitoring, remimazolam-0.6% sevoflurane appears to be a safe and effective protocol in general anesthesia.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

This study was registered on chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200056803, 17/02/2022).

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in bronchoscopic sedation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia. Several studies have used remimazolam for bendable bronchoscopy.

AIM

To assess the safety and efficacy of remimazolam for sedation in patients undergoing bendable bronchoscopy by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for RCTs on bendable bronchoscopic procedural sedation with remimazolam vs conventional sedatives (CS).

RESULTS

Five studies with 1080 cases were included. Remimazolam had the same sedation success rate compared with CS [relative risk (RR): 1.35, 95%CI: 0.60-3.05, P = 0.474, I2 = 99.6%]. However, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.40-0.95, P = 0.027; I2 = 65.1%) and a lower incidence of respiratory depression (RR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.77, P = 0.002, I2 = 42.3%). A subgroup analysis showed a higher success rate of sedation with remimazolam than midazolam (RR: 2.45, 95%CI: 1.76-3.42, P < 0.001). Compared with propofol, the incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.32-0.64, P < 0.001, I2 = 0.0%), respiratory depression (RR: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.30-0.76, P = 0.002, I2 = 78.4%), hypoxemia (RR: 0.36, 95%CI: 0.15-0.87, P = 0.023), and injection pain (RR: 0.04, 95%CI: 0.01-0.28, P = 0.001) were lower.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is safe and effective during bronchoscopy. The sedation success rate was similar to that in the CS group. However, remimazolam has a higher safety profile, with fewer inhibitory effects on respiration and circulation.

Safety and effcacy of remimazolam tosilate for sedation during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Remimazolam in the context of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for sedation during orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial enrolled patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (N = 80), who were randomly allocated to receive either dexmedetomidine (Group-D) or remimazolam (Group-R). The target sedation range aimed for a Ramsay score of 2-5 or a BIS value of 60-80 to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of remimazolam during sedation.

RESULTS

The time taken to achieve the desired level of sedation was significantly shorter in the remimazolam group compared to the dexmedetomidine group (3.69 ± 0.75 vs. 9.59 ± 1.03; P < 0.0001). Patients in the remimazolam group exhibited quicker recovery, fewer intraoperative adverse events, more consistent vital signs, and greater satisfaction at various time points throughout the surgery.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrates that remimazolam tosilate serves as a safe and effective sedative for orthopedic surgery performed under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, in comparison with dexmedetomidine.

Remimazolam attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting the NF-ĸB pathway of macrophage inflammation

BACKGROUND

Inflammation is a major contributing factor in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, and targeting macrophage inflammation is an effective strategy for myocardial I/R therapy. Though remimazolam is approved for sedation, induction, and the maintenance of general anesthesia in cardiac surgery, its effect on cardiac function during the perioperative period has not been reported. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the impact of remimazolam on inflammation during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury.

METHODS

An in vivo myocardial I/R mice model and an in vitro macrophage inflammation model were used to confirm remimazolam's cardiac protective effect. In vivo, we used echocardiography, hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining to determine remimazolam's therapeutic effects on myocardial I/R injury and inflammation. In vitro, we employed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Western blot, Real-time Quantitative PCR (qPCR), flow cytometry, and immunofluorescence staining to assess inflammatory responses, especially remimazolam's effects on macrophage polarization after I/R. Furthermore, molecular docking was used to identify its potential binding targets on the inflammatory pathway to explore the mechanism of remimazolam.

RESULTS

Remimazolam exhibited significant anti-myocardial I/R injury activity by inhibiting macrophage-mediated inflammation to reduce myocardial infarction, enhancing cardiac function. In addition, macrophage depletion counteracted improved cardiac function by remimazolam treatment. Mechanistically, the activated NF-ĸB signaling pathway and phosphorylation of p50 and p65 were repressed for anti-inflammatory effect. Consistently, two binding sites on p50 and p65 were identified by molecular docking to affect their phosphorylation of the Ser, Arg, Asp, and His residues, thus regulating NF-κB pathway activity.

CONCLUSION

Our results unveil the therapeutic potential of remimazolam against myocardial I/R injury by inhibiting macrophages polarizing into the M1 type, alleviating inflammation.

Remimazolam in perioperative management of Eisenmenger syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND

Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) is characterized by severe and irreversible pulmonary hypertension stemming from an uncorrected intracardiac shunt of significant size. The imbalance between systemic and pulmonary artery pressures predisposes patients with ES to the risk of cardiac arrest. Remimazolam has caused less circulatory depression, which may be advantageous for ES. However, no studies reported the use of remimazolam in perioperative ES management.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 45-year-old female patient with ES derived from a ventricular septal defect was scheduled to undergo bilateral adnexectomy for an ovarian tumor. Her oxygen saturation was 80% with 3 L/min oxygen at rest, and her pulmonary and systemic flow ratio was 0.53. She underwent general anesthesia with remimazolam, and intraoperative hemodynamics was stable without hypotension or reduced oxygen saturation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our successful management of ovarian tumor surgery in a patient with ES using remimazolam reveals its potential effectiveness in perioperative care.

The 50% and 95% effective dose of remimazolam tosilate for anaesthesia induction in sleep disorders patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an up-and-down sequential allocation trial

PURPOSE

Previous reports argue that preoperative sleep conditions of patients can influence the dosage of general anaesthesia drugs. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the dose-effect relationship of preoperative sleep disorders on the induction of general anaesthesia with remimazolam tosilate and calculate the Median effective (ED50) and 95% effective (ED95) dosages.

METHODS

Included in our study were 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our hospital. A separate group of 27 patients with sleep disorders (SD group) and 29 patients without sleep disorders (NSD group) using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were also included. According to the Dixon 'up-and-down' design, patients received remimazolam at preselected concentrations starting at 0.2 mg/kg. After the administration of remimazolam, loss of consciousness was observed. By observing whether consciousness disappeared within a minute, we adjusted the dose of remimazolam by 0.1 mg/kg (up and down) in the following patient. The Median effective dose (ED50), 95% effective dose (ED95), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of remimazolam for effective sedation were calculated.

RESULTS

The ED50 of remimazolam was 0.226 mg/kg (95%CI 0.221-0.232 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.191 mg/kg (95%CI, 0.183-0.199 mg/kg) in the NSD group. The ED95 of remimazolam was 0.237 mg/kg (95%CI 0.231-0.262 mg/kg) in the SD group and 0.209 mg/kg (95%CI 0.200-0.254 mg/kg) in the NSD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the SD group, the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam during anaesthesia induction were 0.226 and 0.237 mg/kg, respectively. The induction dose of remimazolam in the SD group was significantly higher than that in the NSD group.

Remimazolam: A Retrospective Study of Initial Safety and Recovery Data in Diverse Procedural Sedation

PURPOSE

The new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, remimazolam, offers a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantage over commonly used procedural sedation medication. This retrospective study explored the real-world utilization of remimazolam during procedural sedation to support the development of a nurse sedation protocol. The primary outcome was to identify associations between recovery time, adverse reactions, and dose-response in expanded patient populations.

METHODS

This study reviewed charts of 292 adult patients from 3 hospitals within one institution who received remimazolam during procedural sedation between June 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. Data were analyzed using logistic and linear regression.

FINDINGS

The median time to alert in patients receiving remimazolam alone was 12 minutes (interquartile range 10, 17) and increased when additional sedation medications were utilized. Receiving additional sedative medication significantly increased the odds of hypoxia (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.30-5.91, P = 0.008) after adjusting for body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS), and total remimazolam dose. There was a 25% increase in odds of experiencing hypoxia for every 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI (95% CI 1.01-1.54, P = 0.037).

IMPLICATIONS

Remimazolam presents as a promising option for nurse procedural sedation, offering minimal impact on hemodynamics and respirations, quick recovery, and no residual sedative effects.

Patient-controlled sedation using remimazolam during third molar extraction: a case report

Dental sedation plays a pivotal role in alleviating patient anxiety during various procedures. Remimazolam, a benzodiazepine derivative, stands out for its distinctive attributes, particularly its rapid onset of sedation coupled with a brief duration, making it an invaluable option for dental applications. The patient was admitted for the extraction of impacted third molars via patient-controlled sedation and not only demonstrated stable vital signs but also expressed a high level of satisfaction with the procedure. An in-depth analysis of plasma remimazolam concentrations and changes in the Patient State Index revealed negative correlation patterns, highlighting the inherent potential of remimazolam in achieving effective sedation. This expanded research scope aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the pharmacological responses to remimazolam in dental sedation scenarios. This case report offers valuable insights into the evolving landscape of dental sedation methodologies and paves the way for a more informed and evidence-based approach to the use of remimazolam in patient-controlled sedation.

Preliminary Experience With Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation and as an Adjunct to General Anesthesia During Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Background

Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine which, like midazolam, has sedative, anxiolytic, and amnestic properties. Ester metabolism results in a half-life of 5 - 10 min, a limited context sensitive half-life, and rapid recovery when the infusion is discontinued.

Methods

Following the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received remimazolam in the cardiac catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiology suites. The primary objective was to assess efficacy and safety. The secondary objective was to describe bolus and infusion dosing of remimazolam and the need for adjunctive agents to optimize procedural sedation conditions.

Results

The study cohort included 26 patients with a median age of 18 years and a total of 33 anesthetic encounters. The most common procedures were endomyocardial biopsy or isolated hemodynamic assessment (right or left heart catheterization). Remimazolam was the primary agent for sedation in 82% of the procedures. The majority of cases (25 encounters, 76%) included a bolus dose of remimazolam prior to the start of an infusion. For those patients who received a starting bolus dose, dosing typically ranged between 30 and 110 µg/kg. Continuous infusion rates of remimazolam varied from 5 to 20 µg/kg/min. No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects were noted. Midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine were the most frequently used adjunctive agents. One patient required transition to general anesthesia due to the need for a surgical intervention based on the findings of the cardiac catheterization. All other patients were effectively sedated.

Conclusions

Our preliminary experience demonstrates that remimazolam effectively provided sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Future studies are needed to further define dosing parameters for both bolus dosing and continuous infusion as well as to compare remimazolam to other commonly used for procedural sedation in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

The safety of remimazolam versus propofol in gastroscopic sedation: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was designed to compare the safety and efficiency of remimazolam with those of propofol in patients undergoing gastroscope sedation.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SINOMED, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies that reported on remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscope sedation from establishment to February 25, 2023. The sedative efficiency and the incidence of adverse events were assessed as outcomes. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5.4 and STATA 17 were used to perform all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 26 randomized controlled trials involving 3,641 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that remimazolam had a significantly lower incidence of respiratory depression (risk ratio [RR] = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.57; p < 0.01, GRADE high), hypoxemia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.49; p < 0.01, GRADE high), bradycardia (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.51; p < 0.01, GRADE high), dizziness (RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31-0.65; p < 0.01, GRADE high), injection site pain (RR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.03-0.13; p < 0.01, GRADE high), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-1.00; p = 0.05, GRADE moderate), and hypotension (RR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.48; p < 0.01, GRADE low).

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam can be used safely in gastroscopic sedation and reduces the incidence of respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, injection site pain, and dizziness compared with propofol, and doesn't increase the incidence of nausea and vomiting.

Effect of remimazolam vs propofol in high-risk patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Procedural sedation is essential for optimizing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, particularly in high-risk patients with multiple underlying diseases. Respiratory and circulatory complications present significant challenges for procedural sedation in this population. This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the safety and comfort of remimazolam compared to propofol for procedural sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in high-risk patients.

METHODS

A total of 576 high-risk patients scheduled to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are planned to be enrolled in this study and randomly allocated to either the remimazolam or propofol group. The primary outcome measure is a composite endpoint, which includes (1) achieving a Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation scale (MOAA/S) score ≤ 3 before endoscope insertion, (2) successful completion of the endoscopic procedure, (3) the absence of significant respiratory instability during the endoscopy and treatment, and (4) the absence of significant circulatory instability during the examination. The noninferiority margin was 10%. Any adverse events (AEs) that occur will be reported.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to determine whether remimazolam is non-inferior to propofol for procedural sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in high-risk patients, regarding success rate, complication incidence, patient comfort, and satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A AND 2B}: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2200066527. Registered on 7 December 2022.

Effect of remimazolam on electroencephalogram burst suppression in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Protocol for a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

Background

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication following cardiac surgery and increases postoperative morbidity and mortality. Intraoperative electroencephalogram (EEG) burst suppression suggests excessively deep anesthesia and predicts POD. Use of remimazolam provides a stable hemodynamic status and an appropriate depth of anesthesia. We aim to assess remimazolam administered for anesthesia and sedation in elderly patients having cardiac surgery.

Methods

This is a randomized controlled clinical trial with noninferiority design. A total of 260 elderly patients aged equal to or greater than 60 years undergoing cardiac surgery will be randomly allocated to receive remimazolam or propofol (1:1) for general anesthesia and postoperative sedation until extubation. The primary outcome is the cumulative time with EEG burst suppression which is obtained from the SedLine system. The noninferiority margin is 2.0 min. The secondary outcomes include the POD occurrence within the first 5 days postoperatively and the duration of perioperative hypotension.

Discussion

This noninferiority trial is the first to evaluate the effect of perioperative remimazolam administration on EEG burst suppression, POD occurrence, and duration of hypotension in elderly patients who undergo cardiac surgery.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200056353).

Dreaming during gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol, ciprofol, or remimazolam anesthesia: study protocol for a parallel-design double-blind, single-center trial

BACKGROUND

Dreaming sometimes occurs during sedation. It has been reported that factors such as different anesthetics, depth of anesthesia, age, sex, and preoperative psychological state may affect dreams. Ciprofol and remimazolam are novel choices for painless endoscopy. Herein, we aimed to investigate dreaming during gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol, ciprofol, and remimazolam anesthesia respectively.

METHODS

This is a prospective, parallel-design double-blind, single-center clinical trial. Three hundred and sixty subjects undergoing elective painless gastroscopy, colonoscopy, or gastroenteroscopy will be enrolled. Eligible subjects will undergo propofol-, ciprofol-, or remimazolam-induced anesthesia to finish the examination. Interviews about the modified Brice questionnaire will be conducted in the recovery room. Incidence of dreaming is set as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include type of dreams, improvement of sleep quality, evaluation of patients, incidence of insufficient anesthesia, and intraoperative awareness. Safety outcomes are the incidences of hypotension and hypoxia during examination and adverse events during recovery.

DISCUSSION

This study may observe different incidences of dreaming and diverse types of dreams, which might lead to different evaluations to the anesthesia procedure. Based on the coming results, anesthesiologists can make a better medication plan for patients who are going to undergo painless diagnosis and treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on May 18, 2023 (registration number ChiCTR2300071565).

Effects of remimazolam combined with remifentanil on quality of recovery after ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine, is known for its quick onset of effects and recovery time. Recently, it has been licensed for general anesthesia and sedation in Korea and its use is increasing in other countries. However, less is known about its effect on postoperative recovery. We used a patient-reported outcome questionnaire to examine the effect of remimazolam on postoperative recovery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hysteroscopy on day surgery basis were administered an induction dose of remimazolam 6 mg/kg/h followed by a maintenance dose of 1-2 mg/kg/h. After surgery, the translated Korean version of 15-item Quality of Recovery scale (QoR-15K) including post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) and/or pain, was surveyed 24 h after surgery to evaluate patient recovery.

RESULTS

Total of 38 patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. All patients successfully completed QoR-15K. Only one patient scored low for moderate pain and PDNV. On average, patients scored 9 and above for all QoR-15K items except for moderate pain (8.66 ± 1.68). When QoR-15K items were grouped into dimensions, all dimensions scored an average of 9 or higher on a 10-point scale. In addition, 19 out of 38 patients gave score range of 148 to 150 out of possible 150.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychometric evaluation based on postoperative QoR-15K among patients receiving remimazolam shows satisfactory patient recovery profiles without significant pain or PDNV. Considering its effectiveness and safety, remimazolam could be one of useful agents for general anesthesia of day surgery in terms of postoperative recovery.

Remimazolam attenuates inflammation in bronchopneumonia through the inhibition of NLRP3 activity by PDPK1 ubiquitination

Bronchopneumonia is the most common pneumonia in childhood. Therefore, we tested the effects of Remimazolam presented Bronchopneumonia and its possible mechanisms. Phillygenin increased survival rate, reduced W/D ratio, and lung injury score, and inhibited IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and INF-γ levels in mice model of bronchopneumonia. Remimazolam induced PDPK1 and p-AKT protein expressions, and suppressed NLRP3 protein expression in lung tissue of mice model. In vitro model, Remimazolam also induced PDPK1 and p-AKT protein expressions, and suppressed NLRP3 protein expression. Remimazolam also inhibited inflammation levels in vitro model. PDPK1 inhibitor, PHT-427 (100 mg/kg) reduced survival rate, increased W/D ratio and lung injury score, and promoted inflammation levels in mice model of bronchopneumonia by treated with Remimazolam. PHT-427 suppressed PDPK1 and p-AKT protein expressions and induced NLRP3 protein expression in mice model of bronchopneumonia by treated with Remimazolam. Remimazolam interlinked PDPK1 protein. Remimazolam increased the expressions of PDPK1 and p-AKT in vitro model. Remimazolam reduced PDPK1 ubiquitination in vitro model.

Application of remimazolam transversus abdominis plane block in gastrointestinal tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is a block of the abdominal afferent nerve fibers between the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominal muscle achieved with local anesthetics. It can effectively block the conduction of the anterior nerve of the abdominal wall and exert a good analgesic effect. However, the effect of combining the block with remimazolam on anesthesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is still unclear.

AIM

To examine the effects of combining TAPB with remimazolam on the stress response and postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal tumor surgery patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 102 individuals diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancies who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between April 2020 and June 2023. The patients were categorized into a control group (n = 51), receiving remimazolam for general anesthesia, and an observation group (n = 51), receiving TAPB combined with remimazolam for general anesthesia. A comparison was made between both groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters, stress markers, pain levels, recovery quality, analgesic effects, and adverse reactions during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The observation group had significantly higher heart rates at time points 1 min after induction and upon leaving the operating room than the control group (P < 0.05). The mean arterial pressure at time point T1 in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Five minutes after extubation, the levels of the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline in the observation group were considerably lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). At 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h following surgery, the visual analog scale scores of the observation group were considerably lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group had shorter awakening and extubation times and lower Riker sedation-agitation scale scores than the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group exhibited considerably fewer effective pump presses, lower fentanyl dosages, and lower incidences of rescue analgesia within 24 h following surgery than the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application effect of TAPB combined with remimazolam general anesthesia in anesthesia of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is good, which is helpful to promote faster recovery after operation.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam compared with propofol in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a single-center, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, as a novel anesthetic, has recently been shown to improve hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and maintenance; however, it has not been reported in the hypertensive population. This study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 120 hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in this prospective study and randomly allocated them to remimazolam (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60) groups. Anesthesia regimens were consistent between groups, except for the administration of remimazolam and propofol. Our primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, which was either an absolute mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg or a > 30% relative drop in MAP compared to baseline within 20 min of induction or from induction to the start of surgery. Secondary outcomes included minimum MAP and MAP at different time points during anesthesia, the application of vasoactive drugs, adverse events, and the patient's self-reported Quality of Recovery-40 scale for the day after surgery.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-induction hypotension was lower and the minimum MAP during induction was higher in the remimazolam group than those in the propofol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is safe and effective in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Induction with remimazolam in hypertensive patients may result in more stable hemodynamics than propofol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 03/12/2020, with registration number ChiCTR2000040579.

Remimazolam besylate versus propofol for deep sedation in critically ill patients: a randomized pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate and propofol for deep sedation in critically ill patients.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study, patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) requiring deep sedation were randomized to receive remimazolam besylate or propofol intravenously. Deep sedation was defined as a Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) score of - 4 or - 5. Sedation depth was monitored using RASS and Narcotrend Index (NI). The primary outcome was the percentage of time within the target sedation range without rescue sedation. The secondary outcomes included ventilator-free hours within 7 days, successful extubation, length of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality. Adverse events during the interventional period were also recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were assigned to each group. The median (IQR) RASS score was - 5.0 (- 5.0, - 4.0), and the median (IQR) NI value was 29.0 (21.0, 37.0) during the intervention period. Target RASS was reached a median of 100% of the sedation time in the two groups. No significant differences were observed in ventilator-free hours within 7 days, successful extubation, length of ICU stay, or 28-day mortality among groups. Hypotension occurred in 16 (53.3%) patients of remimazolam group and 18 (60.0%) patients of propofol group (p > 0.05). No patient experienced bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam besylate appears to be an effective and safe agent for short-term deep sedation in critically ill patients. Our findings warrant large sample-sized randomized clinical trials.

Finding the ideal sedative: a non-inferiority study of remimazolam vs propofol in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires an ideal sedative that provides a predictable action duration and meets safety requirements. We compared the efficacies and safeties of remimazolam and propofol in patients who had undergone ERCP.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-center study, we compared the performances of remimazolam and propofol for inpatient ERCP. Study medications were administered under the supervision of an endoscopist. One hundred and ten patients scheduled to undergo ERCP were randomly assigned to receive remimazolam or propofol. The primary endpoint was a composite of successful completion of the procedure and no requirement for rescue medication. Secondary endpoints included sedation efficacy, recovery time, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 110 patients randomized, 108 underwent sedation, and ERCP (53 received remimazolam and 55 propofol). The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam and propofol in 100% of patients in both arms. Incidences and frequencies of emergent adverse events, including desaturation, requiring treatment were comparable in both arms. However, ERCP was started sooner in the propofol arm (mean, 63.18 ± 16.56 s) than in the remimazolam arm (75.23 ± 32.27 s; P-value = 0.02). Time to full alertness after ERCP was also significantly shorter in the propofol arm (304.18 ± 146.25 vs 448.34 ± 224.09 s; P-value <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is not inferior to propofol in achieving successful ERCP completion without rescue medication. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Remimazolam is a safe and effective alternative to propofol for ERCP sedation, expanding options for clinicians and improving patient outcomes.

remimazolam on emergence profiles after general anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The emergence profiles in patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia with either propofol or remimazolam with flumazenil reversal were compared.

DESIGN

A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial.

SETTING

An operating room and a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

PATIENTS

Adult patients (n = 100) having American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I-III undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly assigned to the propofol or the remimazolam group.

INTERVENTIONS

The propofol group received target-controlled infusion of propofol, and the remimazolam group received continuous infusion of remimazolam. Continuous infusion of remifentanil was used in both groups. For emergence, flumazenil was used in increments of 0.2 mg in the remimazolam group.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the time required for the patient to obey verbal commands. The secondary outcomes included the time to bispectral index (BIS) over 80, the time to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) removal, the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores in the PACU, and adverse events throughout the study period.

MAIN RESULTS

The time taken to obey verbal commands was significantly longer in the propofol group than the remimazolam group (14 [9, 19]) vs. 5 [3, 7]) minutes, P < 0.001; median difference -9, 95% confidence interval -11 to -6). The times to BIS over 80 and to LMA removal were also significantly longer in the propofol group. In addition, the RASS score upon arrival to the PACU differed significantly between the two groups (P = 0.006). Re-sedation in the PACU was observed in 11 (22%) of the patients in the remimazolam group.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia with flumazenil reversal may be effective in reducing emergence time, but a significant incidence of re-sedation was observed in the PACU. Further studies are needed to determine adequate dose and timing of routine flumazenil use and minimize the risk of re-sedation.

Hemodynamic Influences of Remimazolam Versus Propofol During the Induction Period of General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-effect benzodiazepine. In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved it for procedural sedation. Remimazolam is beneficial for consistent sedation and quick recovery in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy. Propofol is one of the most commonly used intravenous anesthetics in clinical practice. Recently, only a few studies have compared propofol with remimazolam for general anesthesia induction.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and propofol during the induction of general anesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

METHODS

The authors retrieved the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for studies published through September 30, 2022, which reported relevant prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing remimazolam with propofol for general anesthesia. The primary outcome was hemodynamic changes, including the absolute value of fluctuation of mean arterial pressure (delta MAP) and heart rate delta HR). The secondary outcomes were the following 2 indicators: the occurrence of total adverse events and the quality of recovery from general anesthesia at 24 hours postsurgery. RevMan 5.4.1 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre for The Cochrane Collaboration) and trial sequential analysis were used to execute the statistical analyses. The different domains of bias were judged by the Cochrane risk of the bias assessment tool.

RESULTS

The authors identified 189 papers in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Eight articles with 964 patients were selected. The included studies had moderate quality. For primary outcomes, the lower delta HR (mean difference [MD] = -4.99; 95% CI, -7.97 to -2.00; I² = 41.6%; P = 0.001] and delta MAP (MD = -5.91; 95% CI. -8.57 to -3.24; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001) represent more stable hemodynamic characteristics in the remimazolam group. Regarding secondary outcomes, a considerably lower incidence of total adverse events was noted in the remimazolam group than that for the propofol group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.58; I² = 63%; P < 0.00001). In comparison to the propofol group, remimazolam achieved an advantage score of quality of recovery -15 in 24 hours postsurgery (MD = 5.31, 95% CI, 1.51 to 9.12; I² = 87%; P = 0.006).

LIMITATION

Firstly, there are only a handful of published RCTs on the administration of remimazolam in general anesthesia. In addition, due to patient privacy, we could not extract individual patient data, therefore we could not combine and assess any variations in patient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that remimazolam has a lower hemodynamic effect during general anesthesia and fewer perioperative adverse effects after general anesthesia than propofol; however, which agent is superior regarding quality benefit in postoperative recovery based on the studies included here remains inconclusive. Additional RCTs with updated meta-analyses to enlarge the sample size and properly analyze the benefit-to-risk ratio to patients are needed to determine the evidence for such a relatively new medicine.

Effect of remimazolam versus sevoflurane on intraoperative hemodynamics in noncardiac surgery: a retrospective observational study using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effects of remimazolam and sevoflurane on intraoperative hemodynamics including intraoperative hypotension (IOH).

RESULTS

This study involved adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery using remimazolam (Group R) or sevoflurane (Group S) for maintenance anesthesia, and invasive arterial pressure measurements, from September 2020 to March 2023 at our hospital. IOH was defined as a mean blood pressure < 65 mmHg occurring for a cumulative duration of at least 10 min. A 1:1 propensity score-matching method was used. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IOH, and the secondary endpoints were the cumulative hypotensive time, incidence of vasopressor use, and dose of vasopressor used (ephedrine, phenylephrine, dopamine, and noradrenaline). Group R comprised 169 patients, Group S comprised 393 patients, and a matched cohort of 141 patients was created by propensity score matching. There was no significant difference in the incidence of IOH between the two groups (85.1% in Group R vs. 91.5% in Group S, p = 0.138). Patients in Group R had a significantly lower cumulative hypotension duration (55 [18-119] vs. 83 [39-144] min, p = 0.005), vasopressor use (81.6% vs. 91.5%, p = 0.023), and dose of ephedrine (4 [0-8] vs. 12 [4-20] mg, p < 0.001) than those in Group S. There were no significant differences in the doses of other vasopressors between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with sevoflurane, the maintenance of anesthesia with remimazolam was not associated with a decreased incidence of IOH; however, it reduced the cumulative hypotension time, incidence of vasopressor use, and dose of ephedrine.

Anesthetic management with remimazolam in very elderly patients undergoing hybrid surgery of transcatheter aortic valve implantation plus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine with small circulatory depression. We used remimazolam for general anesthesia management in two very elderly patients undergoing hybrid surgery of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) plus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 96-year-old man (case 1) and a 92-year-old woman (case 2) had complex coronary artery disease (CAD) and severe aortic stenosis (AS) and were scheduled for TAVI plus OPCAB. Anesthesia in both patients was induced with 6 mg/kg/h remimazolam and fentanyl and maintained with 0.3 mg/kg/h and 0.5 mg/kg/h remimazolam and fentanyl, respectively. Although catecholamines were required, we successfully maintained circulation during the induction of anesthesia and the procedures of OPCAB and TAVI. Both patients were discharged without complications.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam can be a useful option for safe general anesthesia in very elderly patients when performing hybrid surgery.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besilate for sedation in outpatients undergoing impacted third molar extraction: a prospective exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Dental treatments often cause anxiety, fear, and stress in patients. Intravenous sedation is widely used to alleviate these concerns, and various agents are employed for sedation. However, it is important to find safer and more effective sedation agents, considering the adverse effects associated with current agents. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besilate (hereinafter called "remimazolam") and to determine the optimal dosages for sedation in outpatients undergoing dental procedures.

METHODS

Thirty-one outpatients aged 18-65 years scheduled for impacted third molar extraction were included in the study. Remimazolam was administered as a single dose of 0.05 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.35 mg/kg/h, with the infusion rate adjusted to maintain a sedation level at a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of 2-4. The primary endpoint was the sedation success rate with remimazolam monotherapy, and the secondary endpoints included induction time, recovery time, time until discharge, remimazolam dose, respiratory and circulatory dynamics, and frequency of adverse events.

RESULTS

The sedation success rate with remimazolam monotherapy was 100%. The remimazolam induction dose was 0.08 (0.07-0.09) mg/kg, and the anesthesia induction time was 3.2 (2.6-3.9) min. The mean infusion rate of remimazolam during the procedure was 0.40 (0.38-0.42) mg/kg/h. The time from the end of remimazolam administration to awakening was 8.0 (6.7-9.3) min, and the time from the end of remimazolam administration to discharge was 14.0 (12.5-15.5) min. There were no significant respiratory or circulatory effects requiring intervention during sedation.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous intravenous administration of remimazolam can achieve optimal sedation levels without significantly affecting respiratory or circulatory dynamics. The study also provided guidance on the appropriate dosage of remimazolam for achieving moderate sedation during dental procedures. Additionally, the study findings suggest that electroencephalogram monitoring can be a reliable indicator of the level of sedation during dental procedural sedation with remimazolam.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (No. jRCTs061220052) on 30/08/2022.

Clinical Trial Comparing Remimazolam with Propofol during Intravenous Anesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Remimazolam is a water-soluble sedative-anesthetic with short-acting properties and less hemodynamic effects. Currently, it is primarily used for gastroenteroscopy sedation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Remimazolam as an alternative intravenous anesthetic agent in surgical patients, in order to expand clinical options beyond Propofol.

METHODS

Eighty patients aged 20-69 and classified as an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II were randomly assigned to either the Remimazolam group (RM group) or the Propofol group (PR group) for anesthesia induction and maintenance. Hemodynamics and Bispectral Index (BIS) were recorded before and after anesthesia, along with other relevant indices such as the time, to loss of consciousness (LoC), operation time, anesthesia time, awakening time, the number of cases of injection site pain. Additionally, the Ramsay sedation score, intraoperative awareness, dreaming, and postoperative adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

After anesthesia, both groups experienced a significant decrease in blood pressure compared to baseline values, however, the reduction in blood pressure was less significant in the RM group than in the PR group (P<0.05). The heart rate of patients in the RM group remained relatively stable at all time points. There were significantly more cases of injection site pain and use of pressor or atropine during operation observed in the PR group compared to the RM group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time to loss of consciousness, anesthesia time, operation time, awakening time, and intraoperative awareness (P>0.05). However, at 5 and 30 minutes after awakening, the Ramsay sedation score was significantly better in the RM group compared to the PR group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

When remimazolam is used for intravenous anesthesia induction and maintenance, it can achieve a favorable anesthetic effect while maintaining a relatively stable blood pressure and heart rate. Patients experience shorter awakening times (8.3±3.7 min), better awakening quality (5min Ramsay sedation score is 2 points ), and no intraoperative awareness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

AF SOP/3.6-01/5.1.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after artificial joint replacement surgery: comparison between remimazolam and sevoflurane, a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Remimazolam, a newly synthesized ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine, has not been previously compared with sevoflurane with regard to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane among patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the electronic medical records of patients who underwent artificial joint replacement surgery at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital from 2020 to 2022, with a focus on comparing the incidence of PONV among those who received sevoflurane versus remimazolam anesthesia. To control for confounding factors, we employed a propensity score-matching technique to pair patients who received sevoflurane anesthesia with those who received remimazolam anesthesia.

RESULTS

The records of 292 patients receiving general anesthesia for artificial joint replacement surgery were collected and categorized into group sevoflurane (n = 241) or group remimazolam (n = 51). Before propensity score matching, age and ASA-PS exhibited significant differences between two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between them (p = 0.461). After matching, there were 51 patients in each group. However, there is no significant difference in the incidence of PONV between the two matched cohorts (p = 0.243).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that there was no difference in the prevalence of PONV between remimazolam and sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing artificial joint replacement surgery.

Remimazolam: a randomized controlled study of its suitability for insertion of a supraglottic airway

PURPOSE

Loss of motor response to thrusting the jaw forward is a useful indicator for uncomplicated insertion of a supraglottic airway. The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of remimazolam for insertion of a supraglottic airway assessed by loss of response to jaw thrusting.

METHODS

Seventy patients, who were scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia, were allocated randomly to one of two groups. In one group (remimazolam group), remimazolam was infused 12 mg kg-1 h-1 (50 mg maximum), and in the other (propofol group), propofol was infused at 120 mg kg-1 h-1 (500 mg maximum). Once the eyelash reflex disappeared, response to jaw thrusting was assessed. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with loss of response to jaw thrusting before reaching the maximum dose of the test drug. We planned an interim analysis (of one time) after 40 patients, using the Pocock adjustment method.

RESULTS

From the interim analysis results, the study was stopped after recruitment of 40 patients. Loss of response to jaw thrusting was observed in all of 21 patients (100%) in the propofol group, and in 9 of 19 patients (47%) in the remimazolam group. There was a significant difference in the proportion between the groups (P = 0.0001, 95% CI for difference 30-75%).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam frequently does not inhibit response to jaw thrusting, and thus remimazolam is not a suitable induction agent for uncomplicated insertion of a supraglottic airway unless either a neuromuscular blocking agent or an opioid is co-administered.

Remimazolam Compared to Propofol for Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil on the Recovery of Psychomotor Function: A Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare remimazolam to propofol in psychomotor recovery after total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the Trieger dot test.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients who were scheduled to undergo endoscopic sinus surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II were randomly allocated to the remimazolam (group R) or propofol group (group P). In group R, all patients received flumazenil postoperatively. After discontinuation of anesthetic agents, the time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were measured. Psychomotor recovery was assessed using the Trieger dot test before induction and at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after anesthesia.

RESULTS

The time to eye opening, response to verbal commands, extubation, and discharge from the operation room were significantly longer in group P compared to group R (group P: 9.8 ± 3.2 min, 11.5 ± 3.4 min, 12.7 ± 3.4 min, 18.1 ± 4.2 min; group R: 6.5 ± 2 min, 7.3 ± 2.6 min, 8.4 ± 2.9 min, 13.2 ± 3.2 min; respectively, p < 0.05). In the Trieger dot test, the number of dots missed was significantly increased in group R compared to group P at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after discharge from the operation room (group R: 20.5 ± 9.3, 16 ± 8.8, 14.9 ± 11.1, 14.3 ± 10.8; group P: 14.6 ± 7.8, 10 ± 7.1, 8.7 ± 7.3, 7.3 ± 5.7; respectively, p < 0.05). The maximum distance of dots missed was significantly increased in group R compared to group P at 30 min after discharge from the operation room (group R: 3.9 ± 2.8; group P: 2.7 ± 1.6; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that remimazolam with flumazenil leads to rapid recovery following anesthesia; however, it may cause delayed psychomotor decline.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number UMIN000044900).

Effects of remimazolam combined with sufentanil on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients with mild hypertension undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This randomized controlled trial was performed to observe the effect of remimazolam with sufentanil on hemodynamics during anesthetic induction in elderly patients with mild hypertension undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs.

METHODS

Sixty elderly patients were randomly assigned to undergo general anesthesia with intravenous injection of either remimazolam besylate (25 mg/vial, batch number 10T11011; Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yichang, China) at 0.2 mg/kg (Group R, n = 30) or propofol at 1.5 mg/kg (Group P, n = 30). Both injections were completed within 15 to 20 s. If the bispectral index value did not reach 40 to 60, then 0.05 mg/kg of remimazolam was added in Group P and 1 mg/kg of propofol was added in Group R. When the BIS value reached 40 to 60, sufentanil was administered at 0.3 to 0.5 µg/kg and cisatracurium was administered at 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg in both groups. Three minutes later, tracheal intubation and controlled ventilation were performed to maintain the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure at 4.5 to 5.0 kPa. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), continuous cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and pulse oxygen saturation were recorded before induction (T0), when the eyelash reflex disappeared (T1), immediately after endotracheal intubation (T2), 1 min after endotracheal intubation (T3), and 5 min after endotracheal intubation (T4). The disappearance time of the eyelash reflex, injection pain, hypotension, bradycardia, hiccupping, nausea and vomiting, and other adverse events were observed.

RESULTS

The MAP, HR, CO, and CI at T1, T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher in Group R than P, while SVR was significantly lower in Group R than P (P < 0.05). In Group P, the MAP, HR, CO, and CI were significantly lower and the SVR was significantly higher at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0 (P < 0.05). Adverse events occurred in 8 (20%) patients in Group R and 22 (73%) in Group P. The total incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in Group R than P (P < 0 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam combined with sufentanil for general anesthesia induction has the advantages of small hemodynamic fluctuations, stable circulation, and few adverse reactions, making it suitable for elderly patients with mild hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300069224, 10/03/2023).

Remimazolam relieved the injury of hypoxia/reperfusion treated human embryo liver cell line through the targeting METTL3 mediated m6A modification of P53

Background

This study was performed to explore the role of Re in liver IRI progression. Hypoxia and reperfusion (H/R) treated human embryo liver cell line (L-02) was used to establish a liver IRI model.

Materials and methods

Cell behaviors were detected using CCK-8, flow cytometry and TUNEL staining assays. The m6A content was detected using m6A dot blot assay. RT-qPCR and western blot assays were used to assessed the relative mRNA and protein levels. MeRIP assay was conducted to determine the m6A levels of P53. The relationship between METTL3 and P53 was demonstrated using RIP and dual-luciferase reporter assays.

Results

The results showed that Re treatment significantly decreased the cell apoptosis and promoted the cell viability in the H/R treated L-02 cells. Besides, H/R treatment increased the METTL3 and m6A levels in the L-02 cells, and Re treatment decreased them. Additionally, METTL3 overexpression reversed the role of Re in the H/R treated L-02 cells. Mechanistically, METTL3 overexpression enhanced the m6A levels and mRNA stability and expressions of P53. The combination of METTL3 and P53 was further confirmed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that Re treatment relieved the H/R induced injury in the L-02 cells through decreasing the METTL3 levels. METTL3 enhanced the mRNA stability and expressions of P53 through m6A modification. Re-METTL3-P53 axis might a new direction for the treatment of liver IRI in the future.

General anesthesia with remimazolam for emergency cesarean section in a patient with acute infective endocarditis: a case report

BACKGROUND

The anesthetic management of pregnant women with acute heart failure remains challenging with regard to maintaining the hemodynamic status of the mother and baby. The likelihood of decreased blood pressure is lower with remimazolam than with propofol. However, there is no report of general anesthesia with remimazolam for cesarean section.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 34-year-old pregnant woman who was diagnosed with acute heart failure associated with infective endocarditis. We performed cesarean section under general anesthesia using remimazolam, with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support on standby. The mother's mean blood pressure was maintained above 65 mmHg during the surgery, without catecholamines or vasopressors. The infant's Apgar scores were 4 at 1 min and 7 at 5 min.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean section was successfully performed under general anesthesia with remimazolam in a pregnant patient with acute heart failure. Further studies are needed to clarify the association between remimazolam and neonatal hypotension.

Remimazolam for Sedation During Fiberoptic Intubation in an Adolescent

In specific clinical scenarios, fiberoptic intubation (FOI) may be the preferred technique for airway management and endotracheal intubation. In addition to topical anesthesia of the airway, sedation is frequently necessary, especially in younger patients, to facilitate the procedure. The goal is to facilitate the procedure by providing sedation, anxiolysis, and analgesia with maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine with a short half-life and limited context sensitive half-life that can be titrated by continuous infusion. These novel properties may make it a suitable agent for sedation during FOI of the trachea. We report the novel use of a combination of remimazolam and remifentanil infusions to provide sedation during FOI in an adolescent. The basic pharmacology of remimazolam is presented and previous reports of its use for sedation during FOI are reviewed.