Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalizations for Heart Failure

Analysis of the usefulness and benefits of ultrafiltration in cardiorenal syndrome: A systematic review

AIMS

Cardiac decompensation in cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) results in systemic congestion usually treated with diuretics. When despite high doses of diuretics, response is poor, ultrafiltration (UF) appears to be a useful and safe technique. The aim of the study was to analyse, by means of a systematic review, the efficacy and safety of UF versus conventional diuretic treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Search of the main databases (Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) identifying comparative studies of UF versus diuretic therapy, from 2000 to the present. After screening the studies, 13 studies were analysed; 1100 patients (UF: 532, diuretic treatment: 568). Renal function: UF showed a trend to lower creatinine at discharge (SME = -0.68; 95% CI -1.50 to 0.13; I2 = 97%) with no difference in glomerular filtration rate (SME = 0.05; 95% CI -0.17 to 0.27; I2 = 0%). Diuretic response: With UF, there was a trend towards greater weight loss (SME = 1.82; 95% CI -0.79 to 4.42; I2 = 99.7%) and greater volume removed (SME = 3.04; 95% CI -2.13 to 8.20; I2 = 99.8%). Morbidity and mortality: No difference in days of hospital stay (LogOR = -0.14; 95% CI -0.52 to 0.23; I2 = 66.9%) and mortality at 1 month (LogOR = -0.04; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.44; I2 = 0%) but reduction in readmissions in patients with UF (LogOR = -0.60; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.26; I2 = 40.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In decompensated HF and CRS with inadequate diuretic response, UF versus diuretic intensification is an effective and safe option; it reduces readmissions with a tendency to decrease weight, creatinine levels and increase volume depletion without affecting mortality. Prospective randomised studies with a sufficient number of patients are needed to corroborate these results.

Heart Failure-Focus on Kidney Replacement Therapy: Why, When, and How?

Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem because of its high prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and cost of care. An important contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced HF is kidney dysfunction. Almost half of HF patients develop cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). The management of advanced HF complicated by CRS is challenging. Two main strategies have been widely accepted for the management of CRS, namely improving cardiac output and relieving congestion. Diuretics remain the cornerstone and first-line therapy for decongestion; however, a substantial number of CRS patients develop diuretic resistance. In the face of persistent congestion and the progressive deterioration of kidney function, the implementation of kidney replacement therapy may become the only solution. In the review the current evidence on extracorporeal and peritoneal-based kidney replacement techniques for the therapy of CRS patients are presented.

Diuretic strategies in acute decompensated heart failure

Hospitalization for ADHF is linked to poor outcomes, with residual congestion at discharge significantly increasing the risk of HF readmissions and mortality. Diuretic resistance is a major contributor to inadequate decongestion during ADHF treatment. In this review, we discuss various decongestive strategies, emphasizing the management of diuretic resistance. Additionally, we examine the limitations of current decongestion trials and highlight key priorities for future research.

Standardized Definitions of Changes in Kidney Function in Trials of Heart Failure: JACC Expert Panel From the HF-ARC

Perturbations in kidney function are frequently encountered in heart failure (HF) across its spectrum in both chronic and acute settings with distinct implications for patient management and prognosis. Lack of consensus on the threshold for clinically meaningful changes in kidney function has led to heterogeneity in the clinical characteristics and background therapies of individuals enrolled in clinical trials, and in multiple aspects of trial design. A meaningful and collaborative interaction among the disciplines of cardiology and nephrology, clinical trialists, industry sponsors, and regulatory agencies is vital to the development of standardized definitions of changes in kidney function across HF settings. To achieve this critically important objective, the Heart Failure Collaboratory assembled experts in HF and nephrology, including key stakeholders in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and industry, with the goal of developing initial recommendations for improved standardization of design and conduct of clinical trials in HF. Recommendations included how and when to measure baseline and changes in kidney function, discouraging the use of the term "acute kidney injury," and the consideration of urinary markers in the assessment of kidney function.

Acute Heart Failure and Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathies: A Comprehensive Review and Critical Appraisal

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a complex clinical syndrome characterized by the rapid or gradual onset of symptoms and/or signs of heart failure (HF), leading to an unplanned hospital admission or an emergency department visit. AHF is the leading cause of hospitalization in patients over 65 years, thus significantly impacting public health care. However, its prognosis remains poor with high rates of mortality and rehospitalization. Many pre-existing cardiac conditions can lead to AHF, but it can also arise de novo due to acute events. Therefore, understanding AHF etiology could improve patient management and outcomes. Cardiomyopathies (CMPs) are a heterogeneous group of heart muscle diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM), non-dilated cardiomyopathy (NDLVC), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), that frequently present with HF. Patients with CMPs are under-represented in AHF studies compared to other etiologies, and therefore therapeutic responses and prognoses remain unknown. In DCM, AHF represents the most frequent cause of death despite treatment improvements. Additionally, DCM is the first indication for heart transplant (HT) among young and middle-aged adults. In HCM, the progression to AHF is rare and more frequent in patients with concomitant severe left ventricle (LV) obstruction and hypertrophy or severe LV systolic dysfunction. HF is the natural evolution of patients with RCM and HF is associated with poor outcomes irrespective of RCM etiology. Furthermore, while the occurrence of AHF is rare among patients with ARVC, this condition in NDLVC patients is currently unknown. In this manuscript, we assessed the available evidence on AHF in patients with CMPs. Data on clinical presentation, therapeutic management, and clinical outcomes according to specific CMPs are limited. Future HF studies assessing the clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of specific CMPs are warranted.

Diuretics for preventing and treating acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-known complication of critical illnesses, significantly affecting morbidity and the risk of death. Diuretics are widely used to ameliorate excess fluid accumulation and oliguria associated with AKI. Their popularity stems from their ability to reduce the energy demands of renal tubular cells by inhibiting transporters and flushing out intratubular casts. Numerous studies have assessed the effects of diuretics in the context of AKI prevention and treatment. However, a comprehensive systematic review addressing this topic has yet to be conducted.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to explore the benefits and harms of diuretics for both the prevention and treatment of AKI.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies was searched up to May 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in which diuretics were used to prevent or treat AKI.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data using standardised data extraction forms. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where continuous scales of measurement were used to assess the effects of treatment, the standardised mean difference (SMD) was used. The primary review outcomes for AKI prevention studies were the incidence of AKI and any use of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). For treatment studies, the primary outcome was any use of KRT. The certainty of evidence was assessed per outcome using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 64 studies (83 reports, 9871 participants): 53 prevention studies (8078 participants) and 11 treatment studies (1793 participants). Studies were conducted in the following World Health Organization regions: the Americas (15), Eastern Mediterranean (9), Europe (25), South-East Asia (2), and the Western Pacific (13). Thirty-six studies were single-centre studies, 19 were multicentre, and the setting was unclear in nine studies. Diuretics were compared to placebo, no treatment or conventional therapy, saline solutions (isotonic or hypotonic), 5% dextrose, 5% glucose, Hartmann's solution, and Ringer's acetate. Overall, the risk of bias was low in one study, high in 19 studies, and of some concern in 41 studies. Three studies could not be assessed because they did not report any outcomes of interest. For AKI prevention, compared to control, diuretics may reduce the risk of AKI (38 studies, 5540 participants: RR 0.75, 95%, CI 0.61 to 0.92; I2 = 77%; low-certainty evidence) and probably reduce any use of KRT (32 studies, 4658 participants: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.91; I2 = 0%, moderate-certainty evidence) and death (33 studies, 6447 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.92; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). The use of diuretics may result in little or no difference in the need for permanent dialysis (2 studies, 956 participants: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.08 to 3.47; I2 = 21%; low-certainty evidence), hypotension (7 studies, 775 participants: RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.86; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence) and hypokalaemia (6 studies, 1383 participants: RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.73; I2 = 43%; low-certainty evidence), and had uncertain effects on arrhythmias (13 studies, 3375 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.04; I2 = 53%; very-low certainty evidence). Diuretics may make little or no difference to changes in SCr within 30 days (8 studies, 646 participants: SMD 0.41, 95% CI -0.01, to 0.83; I2 = 82%; low-certainty evidence) but it was uncertain whether diuretics increased urinary output (8 studies, 1155 participants: SMD 1.87, 95% CI -0.20 to 3.95; I2 = 99%; very low-certainty evidence). For AKI treatment, diuretics may make little or no difference to any use of KRT (8 studies, 1275 participants: RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.04; I2 = 2%; low-certainty evidence) or death (14 studies, 2052 participants: RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.22; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). Diuretics may increase hypotension (2 studies, 720 participants: RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.41; I2 = 90%; low-certainty evidence) and probably increase arrhythmias (6 studies, 1011 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.33; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Diuretics may result in little or no difference in hypokalaemia (3 studies, 478 participants: RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.31; I2 = 0%; low-certainty evidence). It was uncertain whether diuretics increased urinary output (3 studies, 329 participants: SMD 4.40, 95% CI -0.94 to 9.74; I2 = 99%; very low-certainty evidence). The need for permanent dialysis and changes in serum creatinine were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When used for the prevention of AKI, diuretics may reduce the risk of AKI. However, our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. Diuretics probably reduce the incidence of KRT use, and we are moderately confident in the effect estimate. When used for the treatment of AKI, diuretics may make little or no difference to any use of KRT, and our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. More RCTs are needed to explore the role of diuretics for treating established AKI.

Cardio-Renal Syndrome: Latest Developments in Device-Based Therapy

Background: Cardio-renal syndrome (CRS) is a complex condition involving bidirectional dysfunction of the heart and kidneys, in which the failure of one organ exacerbates failure in the other. Traditional pharmacologic treatments are often insufficient to manage the hemodynamic and neurohormonal abnormalities underlying CRS, especially in cases resistant to standard therapies. Device-based therapies have emerged as a promising adjunct or alternative approach, offering targeted intervention to relieve congestion, improve renal perfusion, and modulate hemodynamics. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various device-based therapies in CRS management, utilizing DRI2P2S classification to categorize interventions as dilators, reducers, interstitial modulators, pullers, pushers, and shifters. Methods: A comprehensive analysis of clinical trial data and observational studies involving device-based therapies in patients with CRS was conducted, with a focus on hemodynamic endpoints, renal and cardiac function, symptom relief, and adverse events. Devices included in the analysis were splanchnic denervation systems (dilators), devices for central and pulmonary pressure reduction (reducers), and systems targeting interstitial fluid (fluid shifters), among others. A systematic literature review from 2004 to 2024 was performed using databases including PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, following PRISMA guidelines for study selection. Data were extracted on patient demographics, device type, trial design, outcomes, and follow-up duration. Results: Device-based therapies demonstrated varying levels of efficacy in CRS, with significant improvements observed in specific parameters. Notable results were a reduction in central venous pressure and improved diuretic responsiveness in acute CRS cases, while also stabilizing or improving renal function. Other relevant endpoints were fewer heart failure hospitalizations and a reduction in renal adverse events, reduced tissue congestion and improved quality of life scores. However, some devices presented challenges, including procedure-related complications and a learning curve for optimal device implantation. Conclusions: Device-based therapies offer a valuable addition to the CRS treatment paradigm, particularly in cases unresponsive to conventional diuretics and other pharmacologic measures. Each of them addresses specific pathophysiological components of CRS and shows promise in improving clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, further large-scale, long-term trials with comprehensive endpoints are needed to establish these therapies' roles in standard care and to optimize patient selection criteria. Enhanced understanding of device mechanisms and refinement of trial endpoints will be key to maximizing the impact of these therapies on quality of life and clinical outcomes for CRS patients.

Acute kidney injury in acute heart failure-when to worry and when not to worry?

Acute kidney injury is common in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It is more common in patients with acute heart failure who suffer from chronic kidney disease. Worsening renal function is often defined as a rise in serum creatinine of more than 0.3 mg/dL (26.5 µmol/L) which, by definition, is acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 1. Perhaps the term AKI is more appropriate than worsening renal function as it is used universally by nephrologists, internists and other medical practitioners. In health, the heart and the kidney support each other to maintain the body's homeostasis. In disease, the heart and the kidney can adversely affect each other's function, causing further clinical deterioration. In patients presenting with acute heart failure and fluid overload, therapy with diuretics for decongestion often causes a rise in serum creatinine and AKI. However, in the longer term the decongestion improves survival and prevents hospital admissions despite rising serum creatinine and AKI. It is important to realize that renal venous congestion due to increased right-sided heart pressures in acute heart failure is a major cause of kidney dysfunction and hence decongestion therapy improves kidney function in the longer term. This review provides a perspective on the acceptable AKI with decongestion therapy, which is associated with improved survival, as opposed to AKI due to tubular injury related to sepsis or nephrotoxic drugs, which is associated with poor survival.

Effect of severity and etiology of chronic kidney disease in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

The study investigates the prognostic impact of the severity and etiology of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the outcomes in patients with CKD in HFmrEF is scarce.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Prognosis of patients with different stages and etiologies of CKD was investigated with regard to the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at 30 months.

RESULTS

A total of 2155 consecutive patients with HFmrEF were included with an overall prevalence of CKD of 31%. Even milder stages of CKD (i.e., KDIGO stage 3a) were associated with an increased risk of 30-months all-cause mortality (HR = 1.242; 95% CI 1.147-1.346; p = 0.001). However, long-term prognosis did not differ in patients with KDIGO stage 5 compared to patients with stage 4 (HR = 0.886; 95% CI 0.616-1.275; p = 0.515). Furthermore, the highest risk of HF-related rehospitalization was observed in patients with KDIGO stages 3b and 4 (log rank p ≤ 0.015), whereas patients with KDIGO stage 5 had a lower risk of HF-related rehospitalization compared to patients with KDIGO stage 4 (HR = 0.440; 95% CI 0.228-0.849; p = 0.014). In contrast, the etiology of CKD was not associated with the risk of 30-month all-cause mortality (log rank p ≥ 0.347) and HF-related rehospitalization (log rank p ≥ 0.149).

CONCLUSION

In patients with HFmrEF, even milder stages of CKD were independently associated with increased risk of 30-months all-cause mortality.

Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome: An Update

The complex dynamic pathophysiological interplay between the heart and kidney causes a vicious cycle of worsening renal and/or cardiovascular function. Acute decompensated heart failure causing worsening renal function defines Type 1 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS). Altered hemodynamics coupled with a multitude of nonhemodynamic factors namely pathological activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system and systemic inflammatory pathways mechanistically incite CRS type 1. A multipronged diagnostic approach utilizing laboratory markers, noninvasive and/or invasive modalities must be implemented to enable timely initiation of effective treatment strategies. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and emerging treatment options for CRS type 1.

The utility of urine sodium-guided diuresis during acute decompensated heart failure

Diuresis to achieve decongestion is a central aim of therapy in patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). While multiple approaches have been tried to achieve adequate decongestion rapidly while minimizing adverse effects, no single diuretic strategy has shown superiority, and there is a paucity of data and guidelines to utilize in making these decisions. Observational cohort studies have shown associations between urine sodium excretion and outcomes after hospitalization for ADHF. Urine chemistries (urine sodium ± urine creatinine) may guide diuretic titration during ADHF, and multiple randomized clinical trials have been designed to compare a strategy of urine chemistry-guided diuresis to usual care. This review will summarize current literature for diuretic monitoring and titration strategies, outline evidence gaps, and describe the recently completed and ongoing clinical trials to address these gaps in patients with ADHF with a particular focus on the utility of urine sodium-guided strategies.

Kidney Replacement Therapies in Advanced Heart Failure - Timing, Modalities, and Clinical Considerations

Acute kidney dysfunction is commonly encountered in advanced heart failure and carries significant prognostic implications, often leading to poorer outcomes and increased mortality. It can alter the course of decision making for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and cardiac transplantation candidacy. Kidney replacement therapies (KRT) offer a critical intervention in this context but require careful consideration of timing, various types of KRT modalities, individual patient preferences and circumstances. This review discusses the intricacies of KRT in advanced heart failure, examining how to optimize timing and choose among the various KRT modalities. It also provides a detailed discussion on the unique clinical scenarios that clinicians may face when treating this vulnerable patient group.

Outcomes of Ultrafiltration in community-based hospitals

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine outcomes of ultrafiltration in real world community-based hospital settings.

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) is an accepted therapeutic option for advanced decompensated heart failure (ADHF). the feasibility of UF in a community hospital setting, by general cardiologists in a start-up program had not been objectively evaluated.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the first-year cohort of ADHF patients treated with UF from 10/1/2019 to 10/1/2020, which totaled 30 patients, utilizing the CHF Solutions Aquadex FlexFlow™ System with active UF rate titration.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were similar to RCTs: mean age 63, 73 % male; 27 % female; 53 % Caucasian; 47 % African American; 77 % had LVEF ≤ 40. The baseline mean serum creatinine (Cr) was 1.84 ±0.62 mg/dL, mean GFR of 36.95 ±9.60 ml/min. HF re-admission rates were not significantly different than prior studies (17.2 % at 30 d, 23.3 % at 60 d, but in our cohort, per patient HF re-admission rates were reduced significantly by 60 d (0.30 p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed success with UF in mainstream setting with reproducible results of significant volume loss without adverse renal effect, mitigation of recurrent Hdmissions, and remarkable subjective clinical benefit.

Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure are often co-existing conditions due to a shared pathophysiological process involving neurohormonal activation and hemodynamic maladaptation. A wide range of pharmaceutical and interventional tools are available to patients with CKD, consisting of traditional ones with decades of experience and newer emerging therapies that are rapidly reshaping the landscape of medical care for this population. Management of patients with heart failure and CKD requires a stepwise approach based on renal function and the clinical phenotype of heart failure. This is often challenging due to altered drug pharmacokinetics interactions with various degrees of kidney function and frequent adverse effects from the therapy that lead to poor patient tolerance. Despite a great body of clinical evidence and guidelines that have offered various treatment options for patients with heart failure and CKD, respectively, patients with CKD are still underrepresented in heart failure clinical trials, especially for those with advanced CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Future studies are needed to better understand the generalizability of these therapeutic options among heart failures with different stages of CKD.

From Hospital to Home: Evidence-Based Care for Worsening Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in older adults. Patients are at high risk of readmission and death following hospitalization for HF. There is no standard approach of health care delivery during the hospital-to-home transition period, leaving missed opportunities in care optimization. In this review, we discuss contemporary randomized clinical trials that tested decongestion strategies, disease-modifying therapies, and health care services that inform the care of patients with worsening HF. We provide evidence-informed recommendations for optimizing therapies and improving outcomes during and following hospitalization for HF. These include adequate decongestion with loop diuretics and select sequential nephron blockade strategies based on early evaluation of diuretic response; initiation of disease-modifying pharmacotherapies prior to hospital discharge with close follow-up and optimization after discharge; cardiac rehabilitation; and transitional or palliative care referral post-hospitalization. Evidence-based implementation strategies to facilitate broad uptake include digital health tools and algorithm-driven optimization of pharmacotherapies.

Strategies for the Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome in the Acute Hospital Setting

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a life-threatening disorder that involves a complex interplay between the two organs. Managing this multifaceted syndrome is challenging in the hospital and requires a multidisciplinary approach to tackle the many manifestations and complications. There is no universally accepted algorithm to treat patients, and therapeutic options vary from one patient to another. The mainstays of therapy involve the stabilization of hemodynamics, decongestion using diuretics or renal replacement therapy, improvement of cardiac output with inotropes, and goal-directed medical treatment with renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors, beta-blockers, and other medications. Mechanical circulatory support is another viable option in the armamentarium of agents that improve symptoms in select patients.

Decongestion (instead of ultrafiltration?)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the contemporary evidence on decongestion strategies in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

RECENT FINDINGS

While loop diuretic therapy has remained the backbone of decongestive treatment in AHF, multiple randomized clinical trials suggest that early combination with other diuretic classes or molecules with diuretic properties should be considered. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors are disease-modifying drugs in heart failure that favourably influence prognosis early on, advocating their start as soon as possible in the absence of any compelling contraindications. Short-term upfront use of acetazolamide in adjunction to intravenous loop diuretic therapy relieves congestion faster, avoids diuretic resistance, and may shorten hospitalization length. Thiazide-like diuretics remain a good option to break diuretic resistance. Currently, ultrafiltration in AHF remains mainly reserved for patient with an inadequate response to pharmacological treatment.

SUMMARY

In most patients with AHF, decongestion can be achieved effectively and safely through combination diuretic therapies. Appropriate diuretic therapy may shorten hospitalization length and improve quality of life, but has not yet proven to reduce death or heart failure readmissions. Ultrafiltration currently has a limited role in AHF, mainly as bail-out strategy, but evidence for a more upfront use remains inconclusive.

Development of a new miniaturized system for ultrafiltration

Acute decompensated heart failure and fluid overload are the most common causes of hospitalization in heart failure patients, and often, they contribute to disease progression. Initial treatment encompasses intravenous diuretics although there might be a percentual of patients refractory to this pharmacological approach. New technologies have been developed to perform extracorporeal ultrafiltration in fluid overloaded patients. Current equipment allows to perform ultrafiltration in most hospital and acute care settings. Extracorporeal ultrafiltration is then prescribed and conducted by specialized teams, and fluid removal is planned to restore a status of hydration close to normal. Recent clinical trials and European and North American practice guidelines suggest that ultrafiltration is indicated for patients with refractory congestion not responding to medical therapy. Close interaction between nephrologists and cardiologists may be the key to a collaborative therapeutic effort in heart failure patients. Further studies are today suggesting that wearable technologies might become available soon to treat patients in ambulatory and de-hospitalized settings. These new technologies may help to cope with the increasing demand for the care of chronic heart failure patients. Herein, we provide a state-of-the-art review on extracorporeal ultrafiltration and describe the steps in the development of a new miniaturized system for ultrafiltration, called AD1 (Artificial Diuresis).

The Congestion "Pandemic" in Acute Heart Failure Patients

Congestion not only represents a cardinal sign of heart failure (HF) but is also now recognized as the primary cause of hospital admissions, rehospitalization, and mortality among patients with acute heart failure (AHF). Congestion can manifest through various HF phenotypes in acute settings: volume overload, volume redistribution, or both. Recognizing the congestion phenotype is paramount, as it implies different therapeutic strategies for decongestion. Among patients with AHF, achieving complete decongestion is challenging, as more than half still experience residual congestion at discharge. Residual congestion is one of the strongest predictors of future cardiovascular events and poor outcomes. Through this review, we try to provide a better understanding of the congestion phenomenon among patients with AHF by highlighting insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms behind congestion and new diagnostic and management tools to achieve and maintain efficient decongestion.

Novel Medical Treatments and Devices for the Management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) is a growing issue in developed countries; it is often the result of underlying processes such as ischemia, hypertension, infiltrative diseases or even genetic abnormalities. The great majority of the affected patients present a reduced ejection fraction (≤40%), thereby falling under the name of "heart failure with reduced ejection fraction" (HFrEF). This condition represents a major threat for patients: it significantly affects life quality and carries an enormous burden on the whole healthcare system due to its high management costs. In the last decade, new medical treatments and devices have been developed in order to reduce HF hospitalizations and improve prognosis while reducing the overall mortality rate. Pharmacological therapy has significantly changed our perspective of this disease thanks to its ability of restoring ventricular function and reducing symptom severity, even in some dramatic contexts with an extensively diseased myocardium. Notably, medical therapy can sometimes be ineffective, and a tailored integration with device technologies is of pivotal importance. Not by chance, in recent years, cardiac implantable devices witnessed a significant improvement, thereby providing an irreplaceable resource for the management of HF. Some devices have the ability of assessing (CardioMEMS) or treating (ultrafiltration) fluid retention, while others recognize and treat life-threatening arrhythmias, even for a limited time frame (wearable cardioverter defibrillator). The present review article gives a comprehensive overview of the most recent and important findings that need to be considered in patients affected by HFrEF. Both novel medical treatments and devices are presented and discussed.

Renal Sodium Avidity in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Increased renal sodium avidity is a hallmark feature of the heart failure syndrome.

SUMMARY

Increased renal sodium avidity refers to the inability of the kidneys to elicit potent natriuresis in response to sodium loading. This eventually causes congestion, which is a major contributor to hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure.

KEY MESSAGES

Important novel concepts such as the renal tamponade hypothesis, accelerated nephron loss, and the role of hypochloremia, the sympathetic nervous system, inflammation, the lymphatic system, and interstitial sodium buffers are involved in the pathophysiology of renal sodium avidity. A good understanding of these concepts is crucially important with respect to treatment recommendations regarding dietary sodium restriction, fluid restriction, rapid up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies, combination diuretic therapy, natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy, use of hypertonic saline, and ultrafiltration.

Diuretics or ultrafiltration in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure is a major public health issue.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and analyze if there is a benefit in using ultrafiltration over diuretics in terms of reducing mortality or hospital readmissions, primarily and identified 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 941 patients.

RESULTS

Compared to diuretics, treatment with ultrafiltration was associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.96, p = 0.02) and significant increase in weight and net fluid loss (mean difference [MD]: -1.55, CI: -2.36 to -0.74, p = 0.0002) and (MD: -2.10, CI: -3.32 to -0.89, p = 0.0007), respectively. There was no significant difference among treatments regarding the duration of hospitalization, the increase in serum creatinine levels, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with decompensated heart failure, compared to diuretics, ultrafiltration is associated with reduced rehospitalizations and increased weight/net fluid loss.

Pretreatment identification of 90-day readmission among heart failure patients receiving aquapheresis treatment

BACKGROUND

The use of traditional models to predict heart failure (HF) has limitations in preventing HF hospitalizations. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in cardiovascular medicine only have limited data published regarding HF populations, with none assessing the favorability of decongestive therapy aquapheresis (AQ). AI and ML can be leveraged to design non-traditional models to identify those who are at high risk of HF readmissions.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop a model for pretreatment identification of risk for 90-day HF events among HF patients who have undergone AQ.

METHODS

Using data from the AVOID-HF (Aquapheresis versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalization for Heart Failure) trial, we designed a ML-based predictive model that can be used before initiating AQ to anticipate who will respond well to AQ and who will be at high risk of future HF events.

RESULTS

Using ML we identified the top ten predictors for 90-day HF events. Interestingly, the variable for 'intimate relationships with loved ones' strongly predicted response to therapy. This ML-model was more successful in predicting the outcome in HF patients who were treated with AQ. In the original AVOID-HF trial, the overall 90-day HF event rate in the AQ arm was 32%. Our proposed predictive model was accurate in anticipating 90-day HF events with better statistical accuracy (area under curve 0.88, sensitivity 80%, specificity 75%, negative predictive value 90%, and positive predictive value 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

ML can help identify HF patients who will respond to AQ therapy. Our model can identify super-respondents to AQ therapy and predict 90-day HF events better than currently existing traditional models.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Utilizing data from the AVOID-HF trial, we designed a ML-predictive model that can be used before initiating AQ to anticipate who will respond well to AQ and who will be at high risk of future HF events. Using ML, we identified the top 10 predictors for 90-day HF events. Our model can identify super-respondents to ultrafiltration therapy and predict 90-day HF events better than currently existing traditional models.

New Challenges in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Managing Worsening Events

Patients with an established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are prone to experience episodes of worsening symptoms and signs despite continued therapy, termed "worsening heart failure" (WHF). Despite guideline-directed medical therapy, worsening of chronic heart failure accounts for almost 50% of all hospital admissions for HF, and patients experiencing WHF carry a substantially higher risk of death and hospitalization than patients with "stable" HF. New drugs are emerging as arrows in the quiver for clinicians to address the residual risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular deaths in patients with WHF. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the emerging definition of WHF in light of the recent clinical consensus released by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the new therapeutic approaches to treat WHF and then move on to their timing and safety concerns (i.e., renal profile).

Role of Lymphatics in Heart Failure

The lymphatic system plays a crucial, yet often overlooked, role in maintaining fluid homeostasis, and its dysregulation is a key feature of heart failure (HF). Lymphatic dysregulation in patients with HF typically results from a combination of self-perpetuating congestive mechanisms, such as increased fluid filtration, decreased lymph drainage into the central venous system, impaired lymph vessel integrity, dysfunctional lymphatic valves, and dysfunctional renal lymphatic system. These pathomechanisms collectively overwhelm the lymphatic system and hinder its ability to decongest the interstitial space with subsequent manifestation and progression of clinical congestion. Targeting the lymphatic system to counteract these congestive pathomechanisms and facilitate interstitial fluid removal represents a novel pathway to treat congestion in HF. In this study, we discuss the physiological roles of the lymphatic system in fluid homeostasis and the pathophysiological alteration of these roles in HF. We also discuss innovative technologies that aim to use the lymphatic system pathway to treat congestion in HF and provide future directions related to these approaches.

Efficacy and safety of early ultrafiltration in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of early ultrafiltration in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMbase databases from inception to April 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of early ultrafiltration and conventional diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Two investigators independently screened all eligible studies and extracted relevant data. The primary outcomes of interest were changes in body weight and creatinine levels, as well as the rate of readmission and mortality within 30 days. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

This meta-analysis included eight studies and found that early ultrafiltration was effective in reducing body weight in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.54-2.35, P = 0.002), but it also increased serum creatinine (RR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.03-0.17, P = 0.003). However, it did not reduce the 30-day rehospitalization rate or mortality rate (30-day rehospitalization rate: RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.62-1.14, P = 0.28; Mortality: RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.57-1.44, P = 0.67).

Conclusion

Although early ultrafiltration is more effective in reducing body weight in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, it is associated with an increase in serum creatinine levels and does not reduce the rate of readmission or mortality within 30 days.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier: CRD42023416152.

Significance of Kidney Disease in Cardiovascular Disease Patients

Cardiorenal syndrome is a condition where is a bidirectional and mutually detrimental relationship between the heart and kidneys. The mechanisms underlying cardiorenal syndrome are multifactorial and complex. Patients with kidney disease exhibit increased cardiovascular risk, presenting as coronary and peripheral artery disease, structural heart disease, arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death, largely occurring because of a systemic proinflammatory state, causing myocardial and vascular remodeling, manifesting as atherosclerotic lesions, vascular and valvular calcification, and myocardial fibrosis, particularly among those with advanced disease. This review summarizes the current understanding and clinical implications of kidney disease in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Combination Diuretic Therapy to Counter Renal Sodium Avidity in Acute Heart Failure: Trials and Tribulations

In contrast to significant advances in the management of patients with chronic heart failure over the past few years, there has been little change in how patients with acute heart failure are treated. Symptoms and signs of fluid overload are the primary reason for hospitalization of patients who experience acute decompensation of heart failure. Intravenous loop diuretics remain the mainstay of therapy in this patient population, with a significant subset of them showing suboptimal response to these agents leading to incomplete decongestion at the time of discharge. Combination diuretic therapy, that is, using loop diuretics along with an add-on agent, is a widely applied strategy to counter renal sodium avidity through sequential blockade of sodium absorption within renal tubules. The choice of the second diuretic is affected by several factors, including the site of action, the anticipated secondary effects, and the available evidence on their efficacy and safety. While the current guidelines recommend combination diuretic therapy as a viable option to overcome suboptimal response to loop diuretics, it is also acknowledged that this strategy is not supported by strong evidence and remains an area of uncertainty. The recent publication of landmark studies has regenerated the interest in sequential nephron blockade. In this article, we provide an overview of the results of the key studies on combination diuretic therapy in the setting of acute heart failure and discuss their findings primarily with regard to the effect on renal sodium avidity and cardiorenal outcomes.

Cardiovascular Consequences of Acute Kidney Injury: Treatment Options

Soon after haemodialysis was introduced into clinical practice, a high risk of cardiac death was noted in end-stage renal disease. However, only in the last decade has it become clear that any renal injury, acute or chronic, is associated with high overall and cardiovascular lethality. The need for early recognition of kidney damage in cardiovascular pathology to assess risk and develop tactics for patient management contributed to the emergence of the concept of the "cardiorenal syndrome" (CRS). CRS is a pathophysiological disorder of the heart and kidneys in which acute or chronic dysfunction of one of these organs leads to acute or chronic dysfunction of the other. The beneficial effect of ultrafiltration as a component of renal replacement therapy (RRT) is due to the elimination of hyperhydration, which ultimately affects the improvement in cardiac contractile function. This review considers the theoretical background, current status of CRS, and future potential of RRT, focusing on the benefits of ultrafiltration as a therapeutic option.

Relative Blood Volume Profiles Hours After Loop Diuretic Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Plasma refill rates can be estimated by combining measurements of urine output with relative blood volume profiles. Change in plasma refill rates could guide decongestive loop diuretic therapy in acute heart failure. The objective of the study was to assess average relative blood volume profiles generated from 2 or 3 follow-up measurements obtained hours after loop diuretic administration in subjects with vs without baseline congestion.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted of articles written in English, French, Spanish, and German, using MEDLINE (1964 to 2019), Cochrane Reviews (1996 to 2019), and Embase (1974 to 2019). Search terms included the following: diuretics, hemoconcentration, plasma volume, and blood volume. We included studies of adults given a loop diuretic with at least one baseline and one follow-up measurement. A single author extracted subject- or group-level blood volume measurements, aggregated them when needed, and converted them to relative changes.

Results

Across all 16 studies that met the prespecified inclusion criteria, relative blood volume maximally decreased 9.2% (6.6% to 12.0%) and returned to baseline after 3 or more hours. Compared to subjects without congestion, those with congestion experienced smaller decreases in relative blood volume across all follow-up periods (P = 0.001) and returned to baseline within the final follow-up period.

Conclusions

Single doses of loop diuretics produce measurable changes in relative blood volume that follow distinct profiles for subjects with vs without congestion. Measured alongside urine output, these profiles may be used to estimate plasma refill rates-potential patient-specific targets for decongestive therapy across serial diuretic doses.

Updates in Cardiorenal Syndrome

Cardiorenal syndrome is a term that refers to a collection of disorders involving both the heart and kidneys, encompassing multi-directional pathways between the 2 organs mediated through low arterial perfusion, venous congestion, and neurohormonal activation. The pathophysiology is complex and includes hemodynamic and neurohormonal changes, but inconsistent findings from recent studies suggest this is very heterogenous disorder. Management for ADHF remains focused on decongestion and neurohormonal blockade to overcome the intense sodium and fluid avidity of the CRS.

Cardiorenal Syndrome in the Hospital

The cardiorenal syndrome refers to a group of complex, bidirectional pathophysiological pathways involving dysfunction in both the heart and kidney. Upward of 60% of patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure have CKD, as defined by an eGFR of <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . CKD, in turn, is one of the strongest risk factors for mortality and cardiovascular events in acute decompensated heart failure. Although not well understood, the mechanisms in the cardiorenal syndrome include venous congestion, arterial underfilling, neurohormonal activation, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Arterial underfilling may lead to activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and sympathetic nervous system, leading to sodium reabsorption and vasoconstriction. Venous congestion likely also mediates and perpetuates these maladaptive pathways. To rule out intrinsic kidney disease that is distinct from the cardiorenal syndrome, one should obtain a careful history, review longitudinal eGFR trends, assess albuminuria and proteinuria, and review the urine sediment and kidney imaging. The hallmark of the cardiorenal syndrome is intense sodium avidity and diuretic resistance, often requiring a combination of diuretics with varying pharmacological targets, and monitoring of urinary response to guide escalations in therapy. Invasive means of decongestion may be required including ultrafiltration or KRT such as peritoneal dialysis, which is often better tolerated from a hemodynamic perspective than intermittent hemodialysis. Strategies for increasing forward perfusion in states of low cardiac output and cardiogenic shock may include afterload reduction and inotropes and, in the most severe cases, mechanical circulatory support devices, many of which have kidney-specific considerations.

Extracorporeal veno-venous ultrafiltration in congestive heart failure: What's the state of the art? A mini-review

Hospitalizations for heart failure exceed 1 million per year in both the United States and Europe and more than 90% are due to symptoms and signs of fluid overload. Rates of rehospitalizations or emergency department visit at 60 days are remarkable regardless of whether loop diuretics were administered at low vs high doses or by bolus injection vs continuous infusion. Ultrafiltration (UF) has been considered a promising alternative to stepped diuretic therapy and it consists in the mechanical, adjustable removal of iso-tonic plasma water across a semipermeable membrane with the application of hydrostatic pressure gradient generated by a pump. Fluid removal with ultrafiltration presents several advantages such as elimination of higher amount of sodium with less neurohormonal activation. However, the conflicting results from UF studies highlight that patient selection and fluid removal targets are not completely understood. The best way to assess fluid status and therefore establish the fluid removal target is also still a matter of debate. Herein, we provide an up-to-date systematic review about the role of ultrafiltration among patients with fluid overload and its gaps in daily practice.

Therapeutic approach in heart failure with poor diuretic response: peripheral ultrafiltration vs. conventional treatment

AIMS

Patients with heart failure (HF) admitted for decompensation often require high doses of intravenous diuretics. This study aims to analyse whether the use of peripheral ultrafiltration (UF) in patients hospitalized for acute HF with systemic-predominant congestion results in better hydric control, renal protection, and reduction of hospital stay compared with conventional treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study was a retrospective, comparative, single-centre study of 56 patients admitted for HF with systemic congestion with a poor diuretic response after diuretic escalation. One group underwent peripheral UF (35 patients) and others were maintained on intense diuretic treatment (control group, 21 patients). The diuretic response and days of hospital stay were compared between and within groups. The baseline characteristics of both groups were similar: males with right ventricular failure and renal dysfunction. The inter-group analysis showed that patients who received UF had better glomerular filtration rate (GFR; UF: 39.2 ± 18.2 vs. control: 28.7 ± 13.4 mL/min; P = 0.031) and higher diuresis (UF: 2184 ± 735 vs. control: 1335 ± 297 mL; P = 0.0001) at hospital discharge despite less need for diuretic drugs. Days of hospital stay were shorter in the UF group (UF: 11.7 ± 10.1 vs. control: 19.1 ± 14.4 days; P = 0.027). Intra-group analysis showed that patients receiving UF improved GFR, increased diuresis, and reduced weight at discharge (P < 0.001), whereas patients on conventional treatment only experienced improved weight but worsening renal function at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute HF with systemic congestion and diuretic resistance, UF compared with conventional treatment produces greater decongestion and renal protection, reduces the total diuretic load, and shortens the length of hospital stay.

Ultrafiltration versus Diuretics on Prognostic Cardiac and Renal Biomarkers in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Existing systematic reviews have insufficiently delineated the differing cardiac and renal profile of ultrafiltration compared to diuretics as a method of decongestion in acute decompensated heart failure. This meta-analysis will investigate the impact of ultrafiltration compared to diuretics on prognostic cardiac and renal biomarkers. We searched PubMed Central, Ovid MEDLINE®, Ovid Embase, all EBM reviews, and Web of Science Core Collection for randomised controlled trials published before 21 July 2022. Our main outcome measures were cardiac (brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) and renal biomarkers (serum creatinine, serum sodium, and blood urea nitrogen). A total of 10 randomised trials were included in our analysis after screening. An inverse-variance random effects meta-analysis of the pooled results demonstrated no significant difference between ultrafiltration and diuretics for brain natriuretic peptide, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, sodium and long-term blood urea nitrogen. However, ultrafiltration produced statistically greater increases in blood urea nitrogen in the short-term (mean difference, 3.88; 95% confidence interval 0.59-7.17 mg/dL). Overall, ultrafiltration produces a similar impact on prognostic cardiac and renal biomarkers when compared to diuretic therapy. We highlight ultrafiltration's significant impact on short-term BUN and recommend further research to investigate more optimal protocols of ultrafiltration administration.

Recent Developments in the Evaluation and Management of Cardiorenal Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is an increasingly recognized diagnostic entity associated with high morbidity and mortality among acutely ill heart failure (HF) patients with acute and/ or chronic kidney diseases (CKD). While traditionally viewed as a state of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) due to decreased renal perfusion, mainly due to therapeutic interventions to relieve congestive in HF, recent insights into the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of CRS led to a broader definition and further classification of CRS into 5 distinct types. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the classification of CRS, highlighting the underlying common pathogenetic pathways of heart failure and kidney injury, including increased congestion, neurohormonal dysregulation, oxidative stress as well as inflammation, and cytokine storm that are particularly evident in COVID-19 patients with multiorgan failure and also in those with other disorders including sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus and amyloidosis. In this review we also present the recent advances in the diagnostic strategies of CRS including cardiac and renal biomarkers as well as advanced cardiac and renal imaging techniques that are available to aid in the diagnosis as well as in the prognostication of this disorder. Finally, we discuss the various therapeutic options available to-date, including fluid optimization, hemofiltration, renal replacement therapy as well as the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in light of recent data from RCTs. It is important to note that, CRS population are either excluded or underrepresented, at best, in major RCTs and therefore, therapeutic recommendations are largely extrapolated from HF and CKD clinical trials.

Tackling Congestion in Acute Heart Failure: Is It the Primetime for "Combo Diuretic Therapy?"

Symptoms and signs of congestion are the primary reason for hospitalization of patients with acute heart failure. Efficient fluid and sodium removal remain the main goals of therapy, and loop diuretics are the recommended agents in this setting. However, the therapeutic response to these medications is known to be variable, and a significant subset of patients is discharged from the hospital with residual fluid overload. Therefore, sequential blockade of the nephron has been proposed as a more effective decongestive strategy. Pilot studies have suggested significant increase in diuresis and natriuresis with combination diuretic therapy. Recently, two groups of investigators examined this hypothesis on a larger scale in randomized placebo-controlled trials; one targeted the proximal tubules upstream of the loop of Henle (Acetazolamide in Decompensated Heart Failure with Volume Overload - ADVOR), while the other one blocked sodium-chloride cotransporters in the distal convoluted tubules (Combination of Loop with Thiazide Diuretics for Decompensated Heart Failure - CLOROTIC). Herein, we discuss the results of these two trials with special focus on their impact on extraction of sodium, i.e., the main determinant of extracellular volume, and put them in the context of previous studies of combination diuretic therapy as well as extracorporeal ultrafiltration.

The Science of Extracorporeal Ultrafiltration: Introducing a Novel Miniaturized Device

INTRODUCTION

Fluid overload has been associated with untoward outcomes in a variety of clinical settings. Isolated extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF) allows for mechanical extraction of excess fluid and optimization of volume status without the established risks associated with use of high-dose diuretics. Conventional machines for renal replacement therapy can be used to perform isolated UF. However, they typically need high blood flow rates with high circuit volumes and the therapy has to be performed by trained nurses. Herein, we describe a novel device, the Artificial Diuresis-1, or AD 1 (Medica S.p.A., Medolla, Italy), which is a portable technology designed to perform extracorporeal UF at bedside.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AD 1 uses a polysulfone mini-filter to generate ultrafiltrate with the help of two forces: blood flow (Qb) and gravity (based on the height at which the ultrafiltrate collection bag is placed). In vitro experiments were performed using human blood to evaluate vascular access pressures and ultrafiltrate volumes using various central venous catheters (CVCs; 12 Fr bilume, 10 Fr with 2 separate lumens, pediatric catheter 7 Fr). A variety of combinations were tested with Qb of 20, 35, 50 mL/min and collection bag height at 20, 40, 60 cm, measuring the UF rate per minute while monitoring the pressures in the venous and arterial lines and filtration fraction.

RESULTS

The device's performance was as expected. Regarding the pediatric CVC, it was possible to perform measurements only with a Qb of 20 mL/min due to increased venous pressure. UF rates when lines were directly connected to the blood container as well as for CVC Tesio ranged from 3.7 to 11 mL/min, for the CVC Niagara™ from 4.5 to 12.5 mL/min, and for the CVC 7 Fr from 8.5 to 10 mL/min. The pressures of the vascular accesses were kept within a range of -5/-40 mm Hg for the artery and +10/+70 mm Hg for the vein. The highest venous pressure values were found with the CVC 7 Fr (+80/+100 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel device allows to treat patients with fluid overload in a variety of settings, from low-intensity department such as long-term care facilities to the intensive care unit. The device is small and portable, has a simple design, and is user friendly. Future studies will be needed to evaluate whether gentle UF and treatment of volume overload will translate into improvement in clinical outcomes such as a reduction in congestion-related hospital admissions.

SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome: Focus on renal tubules

The pathogenesis of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is mostly associated with reduced cardiac output, increased central venous pressure (CVP), activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), inflammation, and oxidative stress. As a drug to treat diabetes, sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) has been gradually found to have a protective effect on the heart and kidney and has a certain therapeutic effect on CRS. In the process of chronic heart failure (CHF) leading to chronic renal insufficiency, the renal tubular system, as the main functional part of the kidney, is the first to be damaged, but this damage can be reversed. In this review, we focus on the protective mechanisms of SGLT2i targeting renal tubular in the treatment of CRS, including natriuresis and diuresis to relieve renal congestion, attenuate renal tubular fibrosis, improve energy metabolism of renal tubular, and slow tubular inflammation and oxidative stress. This may have beneficial effects on the treatment of CRS and is a direction for future research.

Diuretics and Ultrafiltration in Heart Failure

Fluid overload is a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with heart disease. The treatment options are limited to diuretics and mechanical fluid removal using ultrafiltration or renal replacement therapy. This paper provides an overview of the challenges of managing fluid overload, outlines the risks and benefits of different pharmacological options and extracorporeal techniques, and provides guidance for clinical practice.

Management of Hyponatremia in Heart Failure: Practical Considerations

Hyponatremia is commonly encountered in the setting of heart failure, especially in decompensated, fluid-overloaded patients. The pathophysiology of hyponatremia in patients with heart failure is complex, including numerous mechanisms: increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, high levels of arginine vasopressin and diuretic use. Symptoms are usually mild but hyponatremic encephalopathy can occur if there is an acute decrease in serum sodium levels. It is crucial to differentiate between dilutional hyponatremia, where free water excretion should be promoted, and depletional hyponatremia, where administration of saline is needed. An inappropriate correction of hyponatremia may lead to osmotic demyelination syndrome which can cause severe neurological symptoms. Treatment options for hyponatremia in heart failure, such as water restriction or the use of hypertonic saline with loop diuretics, have limited efficacy. The aim of this review is to summarize the principal mechanisms involved in the occurrence of hyponatremia, to present the main guidelines for the treatment of hyponatremia, and to collect and analyze data from studies which target new treatment options, such as vaptans.

Device-based therapy for decompensated heart failure: An updated review of devices in development based on the DRI2P2S classification

Congestive heart failure (HF) is a devastating disease leading to prolonged hospitalization, high morbidity and mortality rates, and increased costs. Well-established treatments for decompensated or unstable patients include medications and mechanical cardiac support devices. For acute HF decompensation, new devices are being developed to help relieve symptoms and recover heart and renal function in these patients. A recent device-based classification scheme, collectively classified as DRI2P2S, has been proposed to better describe these new device-based therapies based on their mechanism: dilators (increase venous capacitance), removers (direct removal of sodium and water), inotropes (increase left ventricular contractility), interstitials (accelerate removal of lymph), pushers (increase renal arterial pressure), pullers (decrease renal venous pressure), and selective (selective intrarenal drug infusion). In this review, we describe the new class of medical devices with the most current results reported in preclinical models and clinical trials.

Effects of Early Empagliflozin Initiation on Diuresis and Kidney Function in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (EMPAG-HF)

BACKGROUND

Effective diuretic regimens using loop diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure are often limited by the development of worsening kidney function. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors induce glucosuria and sodium excretion with nephroprotective effects in patients with stable heart failure but their role in acute decompensated heart failure is unclear.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, we randomly assigned patients with acute decompensated heart failure to empagliflozin 25 mg daily or placebo in addition to standard decongestive treatments that included loop diuretics. The primary end point was cumulative urine output over 5 days. Secondary end points included diuretic efficiency, dynamics in markers of kidney function and injury, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide).

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomized within 12 hours of hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure. Addition of empagliflozin daily to standard medical treatment of acute decompensated heart failure resulted in a 25% increase in cumulative urine output over 5 days (median 10.8 versus 8.7 L mL in placebo, group difference estimation 2.2 L [95% CI, 8.4 to 3.6]; P=0.003). Empagliflozin increased diuretic efficiency compared with placebo (14.1 mL urine per milligram furosemide equivalent [95% CI, 0.6-27.7]; P=0.041) without affecting markers of renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 51±19 versus 54±17 mL/min per 1.73 m²; P=0.599) or injury (total urinary protein, 492±845 versus 503±847 mg/g creatinine; P=0.975; and urinary α1-microglobulin, 55.4±38.6 versus 31.3±33.6 mg/g creatinine; P=0.066) with more pronounced decrease in NT-proBNP in the empagliflozin group compared with placebo (-1861 versus -727.2 pg/mL after 5 days; quotient in slope, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.83-0.95]; P<0.001). There were no differences in the incidence of safety events between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early addition of empagliflozin to standard diuretic therapy increases urine output without affecting renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04049045.

Multimodal Strategies for the Diagnosis and Management of Refractory Congestion. An Integrated Cardiorenal Approach

Refractory congestion is common in acute and chronic heart failure, and it significantly impacts functional class, renal function, hospital admissions, and survival. In this paper, the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in cardiorenal syndrome and the interplay between heart failure and chronic kidney disease are reviewed. Although the physical exam remains key in identifying congestion, new tools such as biomarkers or lung, vascular, and renal ultrasound are currently being used to detect subclinical forms and can potentially impact its management. Thus, an integrated multimodal diagnostic algorithm is proposed. There are several strategies for treating congestion, although data on their efficacy are scarce and have not been validated. Herein, we review the optimal use and monitorization of different diuretic types, administration route, dose titration using urinary volume and natriuresis, and a sequential diuretic scheme to achieve a multitargeted nephron blockade, common adverse events, and how to manage them. In addition, we discuss alternative strategies such as subcutaneous furosemide, hypertonic saline, and albumin infusions and the available evidence of their role in congestion management. We also discuss the use of extracorporeal therapies, such as ultrafiltration, peritoneal dialysis, or conventional hemodialysis, in patients with normal or impaired renal function. This review results from a multidisciplinary view involving both nephrologists and cardiologists.