Ischaemic heart disease in patients with cancer

Cardiologists are encountering a growing number of cancer patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). Several factors account for the interrelationship between these two conditions, in addition to improving survival rates in the cancer population. Established cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia and obesity, predispose to both IHD and cancer, through specific mechanisms and via low-grade, systemic inflammation. This latter is also fuelled by clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Furthermore, experimental work indicates that IHD and cancer can promote one another, and the CV or metabolic toxicity of anticancer therapies can lead to IHD. The connections between IHD and cancer are reinforced by social determinants of health, non-medical factors that modify health outcomes and comprise individual and societal domains, including economic stability, educational and healthcare access and quality, neighbourhood and built environment, and social and community context. Management of IHD in cancer patients is often challenging, due to atypical presentation, increased bleeding and ischaemic risk, and worse outcomes as compared to patients without cancer. The decision to proceed with coronary revascularization and the choice of antithrombotic therapy can be difficult, particularly in patients with chronic coronary syndromes, necessitating multidisciplinary discussion that considers both general guidelines and specific features on a case by case basis. Randomized controlled trial evidence in cancer patients is very limited and there is urgent need for more data to inform clinical practice. Therefore, coexistence of IHD and cancer raises important scientific and practical questions that call for collaborative efforts from the cardio-oncology, cardiology, and oncology communities.

Carotid Artery Stenosis and Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy: A Critical Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature on carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and ischemic stroke (IS) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) to guide assessment, screening, and management strategies.

RESULTS

Patients treated with RT for HNC are at an elevated risk of developing CAS with published meta-analyses demonstrating that CAS >50% occurs in approximately 25% of patients. Previous research suggests a 10-year cumulative incidence of stroke between 5.7% and 12.5%. Cardiovascular (CVD) risk prediction tools such as QSTROKE, QRISK-2 and Framingham risk score perform poorly for predicting IS for HNC patients who received RT. Duplex US is the most common imaging modality to assess CAS, but controversy remains as to the utility of screening asymptomatic individuals. Only three of the five major HNC survivorship guidelines acknowledge RT as a risk factor for CAS or IS, whilst only one makes a specific recommendation on screening for CAS (American Head and Neck Society). Within the general population only one CVD guideline discusses RT as a risk factor for CAS (Society for Vascular Surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians involved in the care of HNC patients treated with RT should be aware of the increased risk of CAS and IS and the challenges in risk prediction. While there is a lack of evidence to make firm recommendations, HNC survivorship recommendations should ensure HNC survivors and primary care providers are informed of these risks and the importance of assessment and management of CVD risk factors. Future studies are required to refine risk prediction models in HNC patients, and to determine those most likely to benefit from targeted screening and initiation of early preventative strategies.

Association of Environmental Injustice and Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors in the United States

BACKGROUND

While the impacts of social and environmental exposure on cardiovascular risks are often reported individually, the combined effect is poorly understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the 2022 Environmental Justice Index, socio-environmental justice index and environmental burden module ranks of census tracts were divided into quartiles (quartile 1, the least vulnerable census tracts; quartile 4, the most vulnerable census tracts). Age-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) of coronary artery disease, strokes, and various health measures reported in the Prevention Population-Level Analysis and Community Estimates data were compared between quartiles using multivariable Poisson regression. The quartile 4 Environmental Justice Index was associated with a higher rate of coronary artery disease (RR, 1.684 [95% CI, 1.660-1.708]) and stroke (RR, 2.112 [95% CI, 2.078-2.147]) compared with the quartile 1 Environmental Justice Index. Similarly, coronary artery disease 1.057 [95% CI,1.043-1.0716] and stroke (RR, 1.118 [95% CI, 1.102-1.135]) were significantly higher in the quartile 4 than in the quartile 1 environmental burden module. Similar results were observed for chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, high cholesterol, lack of health insurance, sleep <7 hours per night, no leisure time physical activity, and impaired mental and physical health >14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CVD and its risk factors is highly associated with increased social and environmental adversities, and environmental exposure plays an important role independent of social factors.

Associations Between Preimplant Cancer Type and Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes: An INTERMACS Registry Analysis

We used the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) database to examine whether history of a solid versus hematologic malignancy impacts outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We included LVAD recipients (2007-2017) with cancer history reported (N = 14,799, 21% female, 24% Black). Multivariate models examined the association between cancer type and post-LVAD mortality and adverse events. Competing risk analyses compared death and heart transplantation between cancer types and those without cancer in bridge-to-transplant (BTT) patients. A total of 909 (6.1%) patients had a history of cancer (4.9% solid tumor, 1.3% hematologic malignancy). Solid tumors were associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.57), major bleeding (aHR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.00-1.32), and pump thrombosis (aHR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.09-2.13), whereas hematologic malignancies were associated with increased major infection (aHR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.14-1.80). Compared to BTT patients without a history of cancer, solid tumor patients were less likely to undergo transplantation (adjusted subdistribution HR [aSHR] = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.45-0.89) and hematologic malignancy patients were as likely to experience death (aSHR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.63-2.14) and transplantation (aSHR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.44-1.08). Cancer history and type impact post-LVAD outcomes. As LVAD utilization in cancer survivors increases, we need strategies to improve post-LVAD outcomes in these patients.

Association of N-terminal Pro-Brain natriuretic peptide with survival among US cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a cardiac biomarker associated with the risk of heart failure and death in the general population but has not been explored in cancer survivors.

METHODS

Using a US nationally representative sample of adults ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2004, this study compared NT-proBNP levels between non-cancer adults (n = 12574) and cancer survivors (n = 787) and examined the association of NT-proBNP with all-cause and cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors.

RESULTS

Cancer survivors had higher NT-proBNP levels than non-cancer adults (median: 125.4 [IQR, 52.4 to 286.0] vs 43.2 [IQR, 20.3-95.0]). In particular, survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers had higher NT-proBNP levels than non-cancer adults (multivariable-adjusted P<.05). 471 survivors died (cancer: 141; cardiac disease: 95) during a median follow-up of 13.4 years (9,393 person-years). Among cancer survivors, higher NT-proBNP levels were statistically associated with increased risks of all-cause (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.18-1.46]) and cardiac (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.21-2.00) mortality but not with death due to cancer (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.92-1.32]). Higher NT-proBNP levels were associated with elevated overall mortality in survivors of prostate (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.17-1.79]) and colorectal (HR, 1.78 [95% 1.12-2.85]) cancers (P-interaction = 0.169). Non-linear dose-response relationships were observed between NT-proBNP and mortality, with statistically significant relationships emerging above 125 pg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors had higher NT-proBNP than non-cancer adults, and elevated NT-proBNP levels were associated with higher risks of all-cause and cardiac mortality in cancer survivors.

SGLT2 Inhibitor Use and Risk of Clinical Events in Patients With Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Certain antineoplastic therapies are associated with an increased risk of cardiomyopathy and heart failure (HF). Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in patients with HF.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) or HF.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified, aggregate patient data from the TriNetX research network. Patients aged ≥18 years with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cancer, and exposure to potentially cardiotoxic antineoplastic therapies, with a subsequent diagnosis of cardiomyopathy or HF between January 1, 2013, and April 30, 2020, were identified. Patients with ischemic heart disease were excluded. Patients receiving guideline-directed medical therapy were divided into 2 groups based on SGLT2 inhibitor use. After propensity score matching, odds ratios (ORs) and Cox proportional HRs were used to compare outcomes over a 2-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 1,280 patients with CTRCD/HF (n = 640 per group; mean age: 67.6 years; 41.6% female; 68% White). Patients on SGLT2 inhibitors in addition to conventional guideline-directed medical therapy had a lower risk of acute HF exacerbation (OR: 0.483 [95% CI: 0.36-0.65]; P < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.296 [95% CI: 0.22-0.40]; P = 0.001). All-cause hospitalizations or emergency department visits (OR: 0.479; 95% CI: 0.383-0.599; P < 0.001), atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR: 0.397 [95% CI: 0.213-0.737]; P = 0.003), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.486 [95% CI: 0.382-0.619]; P < 0.001), and need for renal replacement therapy (OR: 0.398 [95% CI: 0.189-0.839]; P = 0.012) were also less frequent in patients on SGLT2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitor use is associated with improved outcomes in patients with CTRCD/HF.

Severe vs Nonsevere Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Myocarditis: Contemporary 1-Year Outcomes

Background

The long-term contemporary outcomes of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis, spanning the spectrum of clinical severity, are undetermined.

Objectives

We sought to investigate the characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes of patients with severe and nonsevere ICI myocarditis.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with suspected ICI myocarditis at Massachusetts General Brigham Health System conducted between 2015 and 2022. Cases were classified as severe, nonsevere, and negative based on the International Cardio-Oncology Society criteria. One-year cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular readmissions were evaluated. We also evaluated 1-year ICI resumption and left ventricular ejection fraction over a median follow-up of 18 (Q1-Q3: 8-67) weeks.

Results

The study included 160 patients: 28 severe, 96 nonsevere, and 36 negative cases. Patients with severe myocarditis had an increased risk of 1-year cardiovascular mortality, particularly in the early post-myocarditis period (29% vs 5%; HR: 6.52; 95% CI: 2.2-19.6; P < 0.001). Patients with nonsevere myocarditis had a cardiovascular mortality rate similar to negative cases (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.14-2.54). One-year all-cause mortality did not differ between severe, nonsevere, and negative cases (P = 0.74). Rates of 1-year cardiovascular readmissions and long-term left ventricular ejection fraction were also similar among the 3 groups. ICI resumption was low, even in negative cases.

Conclusions

In a contemporary analysis of patients with suspected ICI myocarditis, severe ICI myocarditis was associated with increased 1-year cardiovascular mortality, which was lower than previously reported. Patients with nonsevere ICI myocarditis had outcomes similar to negative cases. The optimal management strategies for nonsevere ICI myocarditis need to be re-evaluated.

Outcomes of untreated subclinical antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation

Subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is represented by histopathological and/or immunopathological manifestations in the absence of significant cardiac allograft dysfunction. Treatment remains uncertain as there is a lack of data on asymptomatic heart transplant (HT) recipients (HTR) with a positive cardiac biopsy. We sought to determine the impact of untreated subclinical biopsy-proven AMR, regardless of circulating donor-specific antigen (DSA) expression, when diagnosed on surveillance biopsies in the first year after HT. This retrospective case control study evaluated 260 HTR between May 2004 and February 2021. These comprised 231 controls and 29 patients with untreated subclinical AMR. The mortality event rate was higher in controls (2.63 events per 100 person-years) compared to the scAMR Group (1.71 events per 100 person-years), a difference that did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 0.66, CI: 0.18-2.36). The combined event rate of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), graft dysfunction, or mortality was higher in the subclinical AMR group (5.60 events per 100 person-years) than in controls (3.89 events per 100 person-years) but did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 1.63, CI: 0.07-40.09). Our results suggest that subclinical AMR diagnosed in the first year after HT on surveillance biopsy is not associated with decreased survival. This may sway the management of subclinical AMR towards a more conservative approach in transplant-capable institutions that currently prioritize treatment, though prospective, randomized studies of such a management strategy are required.

Impact of SGLT2 Inhibitors on AF Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) on recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on the recurrence of AF among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) after catheter ablation.

METHODS

Using the TriNetX research network, we identified, by means of Current Procedural Terminology codes, patients ≥18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who had undergone AF ablation from April 1, 2014, to November 30, 2021. Patients were stratified based on the baseline SGLT2-I use. Propensity-score matching resulted in 2,225 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome was a composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or re-do AF ablation after a blanking period after the index ablation. Additional outcomes included heart failure exacerbations, ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and death during 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

SGLT2-I use in patients with type 2 DM undergoing AF ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and re-do AF ablation (adjusted OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.602-0.776; P < 0.0001). At 12 months, patients on SGLT2-Is had a higher probability of event-free survival (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95; log-rank test chi-square = 8.7; P = 0.003). All secondary outcomes were lower in the SGLT2I group; however, the ischemic stroke did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of SGLT2-Is in patients with type 2 DM is associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation and thence a reduced need for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or re-do AF ablation.

Statins for Attenuating Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Anthracyclines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anthracycline chemotherapy causes cardiotoxicity, and the evidence regarding the benefit of concomitant statin use in reducing it remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies using statins and anthracyclines by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until April 10, 2023. Our analysis included 3 observational studies and 4 RCTs, including the STOP-CA trial released in ACC23. Statin prescription significantly reduced cardiotoxicity in cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy (OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.33-0.63; I2: 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in the decline of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline (MD 4.15, 95% CI: -0.69 to 8.99, I2: 97%). These findings demonstrate the protective effect of concomitant statin prescription.

The underutilization of preventive cardiovascular measures in patients with cancer: an analysis of the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2011-22

AIMS

This study aimed to characterize the influence of a cancer diagnosis on the use of preventive cardiovascular measures in patients with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey (spanning 2011-22) were used. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders were applied to calculate average marginal effects (AME), the average difference in the probability of using a given therapy between patients with and without cancer. Outcomes of interest included the use of pharmacological therapies, physical activity, smoking cessation, and post-CVD rehabilitation. Among 5 012 721 respondents, 579 114 reported a history of CVD (coronary disease or stroke), and 842 221 reported a diagnosis of cancer. The association between cancer and the use of pharmacological therapies varied between those with vs. without CVD (P-value for interaction: <0.001). Among patients with CVD, a cancer diagnosis was associated with a lower use of blood pressure-lowering medications {AME: -1.46% [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.19% to -0.73%]}, lipid-lowering medications [AME: -2.34% (95% CI: -4.03% to -0.66%)], and aspirin [AME: -6.05% (95% CI: -8.88% to -3.23%)]. Among patients without CVD, there were no statistically significant differences between patients with and without cancer regarding pharmacological therapies. Additionally, cancer was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of engaging in physical activity in the overall cohort and in using post-CVD rehabilitation regimens, particularly post-stroke rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Preventive pharmacological agents are underutilized in those with cancer and concomitant CVD, and physical activity is underutilized in patients with cancer in those with or without CVD.

LAY SUMMARY

•This paper compared the use of preventive cardiovascular measures, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical, in patients with and without cancer.•In patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer, there is a lower use of preventive cardiovascular medications compared with those with cardiovascular disease but without cancer. This includes a lower utilization of blood pressure-lowering medications, cholesterol-lowering medications, and aspirin.•Patients with cancer reported lower levels of exercise but higher levels of smoking cessation compared with those without cancer.

Incidence and predictors of anthracycline-related left ventricular dysfunction in acute myeloid leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Anthracycline-related left ventricular dysfunction (ARLVD) is a concern in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing anthracyclinecontaining induction chemotherapy. However, the incidence of ARLVD in the modern era of routine pretreatment left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) echocardiographic assessment, as well as the clinical and genetic predictors of ARLVD are not well understood.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with AML receiving anthracycline-containing induction chemotherapy at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2014 to 2022 were studied. Inclusion criteria included availability of a pre and post chemotherapy echocardiogram to assess the LVEF, pre-treatment LVEF > 50 %, as well as comprehensive diagnostic next generation sequencing assessing for the presence of myeloid mutations. The primary endpoint was the incidence of ARLVD defined as LVEF < 50 % post-induction.

RESULTS

Out of 419 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 34 (8%) patients developed ARLVD. Among the 122/419 patients who did not undergo planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), ARLVD was the deciding factor for ineligibility in 4 patients (1%). Baseline cardiovascular comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, smoking and coronary artery disease) and cumulative anthracycline dose were not predictive of post-induction ARLVD. However, the presence of a JAK2 mutation (but not other myeloid mutations) was associated with an increased risk of ARLVD in multivariable analysis (OR 8.34, 95 % CI 1.55-39.3, p = 0.007).

DISCUSSION

In a group of AML patients with normal LVEF prior to anthracycline-containing induction chemotherapy, ARLVD was infrequent and did not commonly preclude post-remission allo-SCT consolidation. Genetic predictors of ARLVD require further investigation in a larger patient cohort.

External validation of ardiac disease, ypertension, and ogarithmic eft anterior descending coronary artery radiation dose for predicting major adverse cardiac events after lung cancer radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Major adverse cardiac events(MACE) are prevalent in patients with locally advanced-non-small cell lung cancer(LA-NSCLC) following radiotherapy(RT). The CHyLL model, incorporating coronary heart disease(CHD),Hypertension(HTN),Logarithmic LADV15 was developed and internally-validated to predict MACE among LA-NSCLC patients. We sought to externally validate CHyLL to predict MACE in an independent LA-NSCLC cohort.

Patients and methods

Patients with LA-NSCLC treated with RT were included. CHyLL score was calculated:5.51CHD + 1.28HTN + 1.48ln(LADV15 + 1)-1.36CHD*ln(LADV15 + 1). CHyLL performance in predicting MACE was assessed and compared to mean heart dose(MHD) using Cox-proportional hazard(PH) analyses and Harrel's concordance(C)-indices. MACE and overall survival(OS) among low-vs high-risk groups(CHyLL < 5 vs ≥ 5) were compared.

Results

In the external validation cohort(N = 102), the median age was 71 years and 55% were females. Most(n = 74,73%), had clinical Stage III disease and 35(34%) underwent surgery. CHyLL demonstrated good MACE prediction with C-index of 0.73(95% Confidence Interval(CI):0.58-0.89), while MHD did not (C-index = 0.46 (95% CI:0.30-0.62)). Per CHyLL, 32(31%) and 70(69%) patients were considered low-and high-risk for MACE, respectively. CHyLL consistently identified lower MACE rates in the low-vs high-risk group(log-rank p = 0.108):0 vs 8%(12 months),5 vs 16%(24 months),5 vs 16%(36 months),and 5 vs 19%(48 months) post-RT. In the pooled internal and external validation cohort(N = 303), MACE rates in low-vs high-risk groups were statistically significantly different(log-rank p = 0.01):1 vs 6%(12 months),3 vs 12%(24 months),6 vs 19%(36 months),and 6 vs 21%(48 months).

Conclusions

CHyLL was externally validated and superior to MHD in predicting MACE. CHyLL has the potential to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from cardio-oncology optimization and to estimate personalized LADV15 constraints based on cardiac risk factors and acceptable MACE thresholds.

COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease

Background

Data regarding outcomes among patients with cancer and co-morbid cardiovascular disease (CVD)/cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) after SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited.

Objectives

To compare Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related complications among cancer patients with and without co-morbid CVD/CVRF.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2, reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from 03/17/2020 to 12/31/2021. CVD/CVRF was defined as established CVD or no established CVD, male ≥ 55 or female ≥ 60 years, and one additional CVRF. The primary endpoint was an ordinal COVID-19 severity outcome including need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation, ICU or mechanical ventilation plus vasopressors, and death. Secondary endpoints included incident adverse CV events. Ordinal logistic regression models estimated associations of CVD/CVRF with COVID-19 severity. Effect modification by recent cancer therapy was evaluated.

Results

Among 10,876 SARS-CoV-2 infected patients with cancer (median age 65 [IQR 54-74] years, 53% female, 52% White), 6253 patients (57%) had co-morbid CVD/CVRF. Co-morbid CVD/CVRF was associated with higher COVID-19 severity (adjusted OR: 1.25 [95% CI 1.11-1.40]). Adverse CV events were significantly higher in patients with CVD/CVRF (all p<0.001). CVD/CVRF was associated with worse COVID-19 severity in patients who had not received recent cancer therapy, but not in those undergoing active cancer therapy (OR 1.51 [95% CI 1.31-1.74] vs. OR 1.04 [95% CI 0.90-1.20], pinteraction <0.001).

Conclusions

Co-morbid CVD/CVRF is associated with higher COVID-19 severity among patients with cancer, particularly those not receiving active cancer therapy. While infrequent, COVID-19 related CV complications were higher in patients with comorbid CVD/CVRF. (COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium Registry [CCC19]; NCT04354701).

An Increased Understanding of the Association Between Atherosclerosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy activates the host immune system to promote tumor cell death. This activation of the immune system can lead to off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is an established link between inflammation and atherosclerosis. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the existing body of literature discussing the potential association between ICI treatment and atherosclerosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pre-clinical studies suggest that ICI therapy may lead to T-cell-mediated progression of atherosclerosis. Recent retrospective clinical studies have shown higher rates of myocardial infarction and stroke with ICI therapy, particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, small observational cohort studies have used imaging modalities to demonstrate higher rates of atherosclerotic progression with ICI treatment. Early pre-clinical and clinical evidence suggests an association between ICI treatment and the progression of atherosclerosis. However, these findings are preliminary, and adequately powered prospective studies are needed to demonstrate a conclusive association. As ICI therapy is increasingly used to treat a variety of solid tumors, it is important to evaluate and mitigate the potential adverse atherosclerotic effects of ICI treatment.

Mogamulizumab-Associated Myositis With and Without Myasthenia Gravis and/or Myocarditis in Patients With T-Cell Lymphoma

Mogamulizumab is being increasingly prescribed for the treatment of T-cell lymphomas (MF/SS/ATLL). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify muscular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with mogamulizumab in patients with T-cell lymphoma followed at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from January 2015 to June 2022. We identified 5 cases of mogamulizumab-associated myositis and/or myocarditis (MAM/Mc), 2 additionally affected by myasthenia gravis, among 42 patients with T-cell lymphoma. Three cases experienced -mogamulizumab-associated rash (MAR) prior to developing MAM/Mc. The incidence (n = 5/42, 11.9%) of muscular mogamulizumab-associated irAEs may be higher than has been previously reported in clinical trials and may be of late onset (a median of 5 cycles and as late as 100 days from the last infusion). We highlight the utility of IVIG, together with systemic corticosteroids, for the treatment of these potentially fatal side effects associated with mogamulizumab therapy.

Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with history of cancer

BACKGROUND

Though the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increased in patients with cancer, the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) for AF in patients with cancer is not well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent CA for AF. Patients with a history of cancer within 5-years prior to, or those with an exposure to anthracyclines and/or thoracic radiation at any time prior to the index ablation were compared to patients without a history of cancer who underwent AF ablation. The primary outcome was freedom from AF [with or without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs), or need for repeat CA at 12-months post-ablation]. Secondary endpoints included freedom from AF at 12 months post-ablation with AADs and without AADs. Safety endpoints included bleeding, pulmonary vein stenosis, stroke, and cardiac tamponade. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk predictors of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 502 patients included in the study, 251 (50%) had a history of cancer. Freedom from AF at 12 months did not differ between patients with and without cancer (83.3% vs 72.5%, p 0.28). The need for repeat ablation was also similar between groups (20.7% vs 27.5%, p 0.29). Multivariable regression analysis did not identify a history of cancer or cancer-related therapy as independent predictors of recurrent AF after ablation. There was no difference in safety endpoints between groups.

CONCLUSION

CA is a safe and effective treatment for AF in patients with a history of cancer and those with exposure to potentially cardiotoxic therapy.

Real-World Efficacy of Tafamidis in Patients With Transthyretin Amyloidosis and Heart Failure

Tafamidis was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in the ATTR-ACT trial. However, real-world data on the efficacy of tafamidis are limited. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study using the TriNetX research network. Patients with wild-type TTR amyloidosis and heart failure (HF) were divided into 2 groups based on treatment with tafamidis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and rates of heart failure exacerbations (HFE) and all-cause mortality at 12 months were compared. After PSM, 421 patients were in each group (tafamidis vs nontafamidis). During the 12-month follow-up period, patients treated with tafamidis experienced significantly less HFE and all-cause mortality. A higher probability of event-free survival for HFE and all-cause mortality was noted with tafamidis. This real-world analysis supports that tafamidis use is associated with reduced HFE and all-cause mortality in patients with wild-type TTR amyloidosis and HF. Longer-term follow-up is needed to better understand the utility of tafamidis, given the increasing recognition of ATTR-CM and the high cost of tafamidis.

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) in patients with history of cancer

Background

Surgical therapy has been a long-standing option for valvular heart disease, in patients with history of cancer, it carries an increased risk of complications.

Objectives

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for mitral regurgitation, represents a less invasive option. However, patients with history of cancer have generally been excluded from trials.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on de-identified, aggregate patient data from the TriNetX research network. Patients 18 ≥ years of age, who had undergone TEER between January 1, 2013 and May 19, 2021, were identified using the CPT codes and divided into two cohorts based on a history of cancer. Subgroup analysis was performed based on history of systemic antineoplastic therapy. Odds ratio and log-rank test were used to compare the outcomes over 1 and 12-months.

Results

In matched cohorts (503 patients in each, mean age 77.7 years, men 55 vs 58 %, white 84 vs 87 % in non-cancer and cancer cohorts respectively), the risk of heart failure exacerbation, all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations were similar at 1 and 12 months among patients undergoing TEER. Risk of major complications (ischemic stroke, blood product transfusion and cardiac tamponade) were also similar. In the cancer cohort, hematologic/lymphoid malignancies were the most common (28.0 %) and 12.5 % patients had a history of metastatic cancer. There was no significant difference in heart failure exacerbation or all-cause mortality based on history of systemic antineoplastic therapy.

Conclusions

Overall outcomes following TEER are similar in patients with a history of cancer and should be considered in selected patients in this population.

Systematic review and updated recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group

Survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer, previously treated with anthracycline chemotherapy (including mitoxantrone) or radiotherapy in which the heart was exposed, are at increased risk of cardiomyopathy. Symptomatic cardiomyopathy is typically preceded by a series of gradually progressive, asymptomatic changes in structure and function of the heart that can be ameliorated with treatment, prompting specialist organisations to endorse guidelines on cardiac surveillance in at-risk survivors of cancer. In 2015, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group compiled these guidelines into a uniform set of recommendations applicable to a broad spectrum of clinical environments with varying resource availabilities. Since then, additional studies have provided insight into dose thresholds associated with a risk of asymptomatic and symptomatic cardiomyopathy, have characterised risk over time, and have established the cost-effectiveness of different surveillance strategies. This systematic Review and guideline provides updated recommendations based on the evidence published up to September, 2020.

Functional testing, coronary artery calcifications, and outcomes in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with chest radiation

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines recommend periodic screening for coronary artery disease (CAD) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) survivors treated with radiation therapy (RT) to the chest. However, the prognostic utility of screening strategies in this population remains unclear. We evaluated the association between functional testing, coronary artery calcifications (CAC), and guideline-based risk assessment and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in HL survivors treated with RT.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied HL survivors treated with RT who underwent functional testing between 2003 and 2020 and chest computed tomography (CT) within 12 months of each other at our center. CAC was assessed semi-quantitatively from CT images. Cardiovascular risk was estimated using the 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Diagnostic test characteristics were calculated using major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during follow-up as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The study included 159 patients (median age at functional testing 48 years, median age at HL diagnosis 27 years, 62.9% female). Abnormal functional testing had the highest specificity (94.2% (95% CI 88.4%-97.6%)) and positive likelihood ratio (4.55 (95% CI 1.86-11.13)) while CAC had the highest sensitivity (63.2% (95% CI 46.0%-78.2%)) and lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.80)). Specificity for ACC/AHA risk assessment was also high (88.5% (95% CI 81.1%-93.7%)). Over 3.3 years of follow-up, abnormal functional testing (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 5.10, 95% CI 2.41 - 10.78, p < 0.001) and CAC (adjusted SHR 3.58, 95% CI 1.35 - 9.47, p = 0.010) were both significantly associated with MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In HL survivors treated with RT, both abnormal functional testing and ACC/AHA risk assessment had high specificity for subsequent MACE, but CAC had higher sensitivity. Further research is needed to inform CAD screening and primary prevention strategies in this population.

Interplay of Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Among Patients With Cancer and COVID-19

Importance

Cytokine storm due to COVID-19 can cause high morbidity and mortality and may be more common in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy (IO) due to immune system activation.

Objective

To determine the association of baseline immunosuppression and/or IO-based therapies with COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm in patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included 12 046 patients reported to the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry from March 2020 to May 2022. The CCC19 registry is a centralized international multi-institutional registry of patients with COVID-19 with a current or past diagnosis of cancer. Records analyzed included patients with active or previous cancer who had a laboratory-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction and/or serologic findings.

Exposures

Immunosuppression due to therapy; systemic anticancer therapy (IO or non-IO).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a 5-level ordinal scale of COVID-19 severity: no complications; hospitalized without requiring oxygen; hospitalized and required oxygen; intensive care unit admission and/or mechanical ventilation; death. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of cytokine storm.

Results

The median age of the entire cohort was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-74) years and 6359 patients were female (52.8%) and 6598 (54.8%) were non-Hispanic White. A total of 599 (5.0%) patients received IO, whereas 4327 (35.9%) received non-IO systemic anticancer therapies, and 7120 (59.1%) did not receive any antineoplastic regimen within 3 months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. Although no difference in COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm was found in the IO group compared with the untreated group in the total cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.13, and aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.41-1.93, respectively), patients with baseline immunosuppression treated with IO (vs untreated) had worse COVID-19 severity and cytokine storm (aOR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.38-8.01, and aOR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.71-11.38, respectively). Patients with immunosuppression receiving non-IO therapies (vs untreated) also had worse COVID-19 severity (aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.35) and cytokine storm (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.42-3.79).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that in patients with cancer and COVID-19, administration of systemic anticancer therapies, especially IO, in the context of baseline immunosuppression was associated with severe clinical outcomes and the development of cytokine storm.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04354701.

Cardiotoxicity of T-Cell Antineoplastic Therapies: JACC: CardioOncology Primer

T-cell therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell, bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapies, fight cancer cells harboring specific tumor antigens. However, activation of the immune response by these therapies can lead to a systemic inflammatory response, termed cytokine release syndrome (CRS), that can result in adverse events, including cardiotoxicity. Retrospective studies have shown that cardiovascular complications occur in 10% to 20% of patients who develop high-grade CRS after CAR T-cell therapy and can include cardiomyopathy, heart failure, arrhythmias, and myocardial infarction. While cardiotoxicities have been less commonly reported with BiTE and TIL therapies, systematic surveillance for cardiotoxicity has not been performed. Patients undergoing T-cell therapies should be screened for cardiovascular conditions that may not be able to withstand the hemodynamic perturbations imposed by CRS. Generalized management of CRS, including the use of the interleukin-6 antagonist, tocilizumab, for high-grade CRS, is used to mitigate the risk of cardiotoxicity.

Coronary vasomotor dysfunction portends worse outcomes in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Impaired MFR in the absence of flow-limiting CAD is associated with adverse events. Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with breast cancer. We sought to test the utility of MFR to predict outcomes in a cohort of patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with breast cancer or breast cancer survivors who underwent cardiac stress PET imaging from 2006 to 2017 at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Patients with a history of clinically overt CAD, LVEF < 45%, or abnormal myocardial perfusion were excluded. Subjects were followed from time of PET to the occurrence of a first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and all-cause death.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 87 patients (median age 69.0 years, 98.9% female, mean MFR 2.05). Over a median follow-up of 7.6 years after PET, the lowest MFR tertile was associated with higher cumulative incidence of MACE (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 4.91; 95% CI 1.68-14.38; p = 0.004) when compared with the highest MFR tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with breast cancer, coronary vasomotor dysfunction was associated with incident cardiovascular events. MFR may have potential as a risk stratification biomarker among patients with/survivors of breast cancer.

Challenges for Patients Dying of Heart Failure and Cancer

BACKGROUND

Hospice and palliative care were originally implemented for patients dying of cancer, both of which continue to be underused in patients with heart failure (HF). The objective of this study was to understand the unique challenges faced by patients dying of HF compared with cancer.

METHODS

We assessed differences in demographics, health status, and financial burden between patients dying of HF and cancer from the Health and Retirement Study.

RESULTS

The analysis included 3203 individuals who died of cancer and 3555 individuals who died of HF between 1994 and 2014. Compared with patients dying of cancer, patients dying of HF were older (80 years versus 76 years), had poorer self-reported health, and had greater difficulty with all activities of daily living while receiving less informal help. Their death was far more likely to be considered unexpected (39% versus 70%) and they were much more likely to have died without warning or within 1 to 2 hours (20% versus 1%). They were more likely to die in a hospital or nursing home than at home or in hospice. Both groups faced similarly high total healthcare out-of-pockets costs ($9988 versus $9595, P=0.6) though patients dying of HF had less wealth ($29 895 versus $39 008), thereby experiencing greater financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients dying of cancer, those dying from HF are older, have greater difficulty with activities of daily living, are more likely to die suddenly, in a hospital or nursing home rather than home or hospice, and had worse financial burden.

The new 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-oncology and their impact on the Acute Cardiovascular Care Society

In this perspective piece on the recently published ESC Guidelines on Cardio-oncology and the Consensus Statements from the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association, we summarize key learning points regarding the management of acute cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer. This document outlines where other pre-existing ESC Guidelines can be applied to the management of acute cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer while simultaneously highlighting important gaps in knowledge that require further research.

Cancer and cardiovascular disease share common risk factors and often co-exist, especially in older patients. In addition, patients with cancer undergoing active treatment are exposed to multiple, potentially cardiotoxic drugs, which may manifest as a variety of cardiovascular events, including left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure, arrhythmias, hypertension, or acute venous and arterial vascular events.

Knowledge about potential causative cancer therapeutics is necessary for rapid recognition and management to improve cardiovascular outcomes and guide ongoing cancer treatment. Specifically, the importance of rapidly interrupting culprit cancer drugs is highlighted, as well as instituting standard guideline-based therapies for conditions such as acute heart failure and acute coronary syndromes [ST-elevation myocardial infarction and high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS)]. Given the high prevalence of thrombocytopenia and increased bleeding risk in patients with cancer, we are provided with platelet cut-offs for the use of different antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for patients with ACS and atrial arrhythmias. In contrast, given the hypercoagulable milieu of cancer, we are provided information regarding types of anticoagulants, drug–drug interactions, and duration of anticoagulation in patients with acute venous thromboembolism, as well as for atrial fibrillation. They also discuss the diagnostic and treatment strategies for the unique cardiotoxicities seen with novel cancer therapeutics such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric receptor antigen T-cell therapy. Last, but not least, the authors emphasize that the care of these patients requires close collaboration between cardiology and oncology to maximize both cardiovascular and cancer outcomes.

Cardiovascular Drug Interactions With Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir in Patients With COVID-19: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMVr) is used to treat symptomatic, nonhospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) who are at high risk of progression to severe disease. Patients with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease are at a high risk of developing adverse events from COVID-19 and as a result have a higher likelihood of receiving NMVr. Ritonavir, the pharmaceutical enhancer used in NMVr, is an inhibitor of the enzymes of CYP450 pathway, particularly CYP3A4 and to a lesser degree CYP2D6, and affects the P-glycoprotein pump. Co-administration of NMVr with medications commonly used to manage cardiovascular conditions can potentially cause significant drug-drug interactions and may lead to severe adverse effects. It is crucial to be aware of such interactions and take appropriate measures to avoid them. In this review, we discuss potential drug-drug interactions between NMVr and commonly used cardiovascular medications based on their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties.

Global Circumferential and Radial Strain Among Patients With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Myocarditis

BACKGROUND

Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global radial strain (GRS) are reduced with cytotoxic chemotherapy. There are limited data on the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) myocarditis on GCS and GRS.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to detail the role of GCS and GRS in ICI myocarditis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, GCS and GRS from 75 cases of patients with ICI myocarditis and 50 ICI-treated patients without myocarditis (controls) were compared. Pre-ICI GCS and GRS were available for 12 cases and 50 controls. Measurements were performed in a core laboratory blinded to group and time. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, complete heart block, and cardiac death.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were similar in age (66 ± 15 years vs 63 ± 12 years; P = 0.20), sex (male: 73% vs 61%; P = 0.20) and cancer type (P = 0.08). Pre-ICI GCS and GRS were also similar (GCS: 22.6% ± 3.4% vs 23.5% ± 3.8%; P = 0.14; GRS: 45.5% ± 6.2% vs 43.6% ± 8.8%; P = 0.24). Overall, 56% (n = 42) of patients with myocarditis presented with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). GCS and GRS were lower in myocarditis compared with on-ICI controls (GCS: 17.5% ± 4.2% vs 23.6% ± 3.0%; P < 0.001; GRS: 28.6% ± 6.7% vs 47.0% ± 7.4%; P < 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 30 days, 28 cardiovascular events occurred. A GCS (HR: 4.9 [95% CI: 1.6-15.0]; P = 0.005) and GRS (HR: 3.9 [95% CI: 1.4-10.8]; P = 0.008) below the median was associated with an increased event rate. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, GCS (AUC: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.70-0.91]) and GRS (AUC: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.64-0.88]) showed better performance than cardiac troponin T (cTnT) (AUC: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.58-0.82]), LVEF (AUC: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.56-0.81]), and age (AUC: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.40-0.68]). Net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement demonstrated incremental prognostic utility of GRS over LVEF (P = 0.04) and GCS over cTnT (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

GCS and GRS are lower in ICI myocarditis, and the magnitude of reduction has prognostic significance.

Statin Therapy for Prevention of Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity - Another Defeat for Cardioprotection?

Reduction in left ventricular (LV) systolic function and clinical heart failure (HF) are well-known potential consequences of anthracycline therapy for cancer. Putative mechanisms include myocardial dysfunction and damage caused by the production of reactive oxygen species and topoisomerase II-mediated cell death.1,2 Interest in the use of statins as a preventive strategy against anthracycline-mediated cardiotoxicity centers on the pleotropic (anti-inflammatory) effects of statin therapy.3 Support for statins as potential cardioprotective agents during anthracycline-based chemotherapy stems from observational cohort studies, two small prospective trials, and meta-analyses.

Impact of Social Vulnerability on Comorbid Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States

Background

Racial and social disparities exist in outcomes related to cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Objectives

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to study the impact of social vulnerability on mortality attributed to comorbid cancer and CVD.

Methods

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database (2015-2019) was used to obtain county-level mortality data attributed to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD. County-level social vulnerability index (SVI) data (2014-2018) were obtained from the CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. SVI percentiles were generated for each county and aggregated to form SVI quartiles. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were estimated and compared across SVI quartiles to assess the impact of social vulnerability on mortality related to cancer, CVD, and comorbid cancer and CVD.

Results

The AAMR for comorbid cancer and CVD was 47.75 (95% CI: 47.66-47.85) per 100,000 person-years, with higher mortality in counties with greater social vulnerability. AAMRs for cancer and CVD were also significantly greater in counties with the highest SVIs. However, the proportional increase in mortality between the highest and lowest SVI counties was greater for comorbid cancer and CVD than for either cancer or CVD alone. Adults <45 years of age, women, Asian and Pacific Islanders, and Hispanics had the highest relative increase in comorbid cancer and CVD mortality between the fourth and first SVI quartiles, without significant urban-rural differences.

Conclusions

Comorbid cancer and CVD mortality increased in counties with higher social vulnerability. Improved education, resource allocation, and targeted public health interventions are needed to address inequities in cardio-oncology.

Delphi Panel Consensus Recommendations for Screening and Managing Childhood Cancer Survivors at Risk for Cardiomyopathy

Background

Cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Evidence-based guidelines recommend risk-stratified screening for cardiomyopathy, but the management approach for abnormalities detected when screening asymptomatic young adult CCS is poorly defined.

Objectives

The aims of this study were to build upon existing guidelines by describing the expert consensus–based cardiomyopathy screening practices, management approach, and clinical rationale for the management of young adult CCS with screening-detected abnormalities and to identify areas of controversy in practice.

Methods

A multispecialty Delphi panel of 40 physicians with expertise in cancer survivorship completed 3 iterative rounds of semi-open-ended questionnaires regarding their approaches to the management of asymptomatic young adult CCS at risk for cardiomyopathy (screening practices, referrals, cardiac testing, laboratory studies, medications). Consensus was defined as ≥90% panelist agreement with recommendation.

Results

The response rate was 100% for all 3 rounds. Panelists reached consensus on the timing and frequency of echocardiographic screening for anthracycline-associated cardiomyopathy, monitoring during pregnancy, laboratory testing for modifiable cardiac risk factors, and referral to cardiology for ejection fraction ≤50% or preserved ejection fraction with diastolic dysfunction. Controversial areas (<75% agreement) included chest radiation dose threshold to merit screening, indications for advanced cardiac imaging and cardiac serum biomarkers for follow-up of abnormal echocardiographic findings, and medical management of asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Conclusions

Expert practice is largely consistent with existing risk-based screening guidelines. Some recommendations for managing abnormalities detected on screening echocardiography remain controversial. The rationale offered by experts for divergent approaches may help guide clinical decisions in the absence of guidelines specific to young adult CCS.

Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors and Cardiac Outcomes Among Patients Treated With Anthracyclines

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes among patients with established heart failure. Despite supportive basic science studies, there are no data on the value of SGLT2 inhibitors among patients treated with anthracyclines.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to test the cardiac efficacy and overall safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients treated with anthracyclines.

METHODS

This study identified 3,033 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and cancer who were treated with anthracyclines. Cases were patients with cancer and DM who were on SGLT2 inhibitor therapy during anthracycline treatment (n = 32). Control participants (n = 96) were patients with cancer and DM who were also treated with anthracyclines, but were not on an SGLT2 inhibitor. The primary cardiac outcome was a composite of cardiac events (heart failure incidence, heart failure admissions, new cardiomyopathy [>10% decline in ejection fraction to <53%], and clinically significant arrhythmias). The primary safety outcome was overall mortality.

RESULTS

Age, sex, ethnicity, cancer type, cancer stage, and other cardiac risk factors were similar between groups. There were 20 cardiac events over a median follow-up period of 1.5 years. The cardiac event incidence was lower among case patients in comparison to control participants (3% vs 20%; P = 0.025). Case patients also experienced lower overall mortality when compared with control participants (9% vs 43%; P < 0.001) and a lower composite of sepsis and neutropenic fever (16% vs 40%; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with lower rate of cardiac events among patients with cancer and DM who were treated with anthracyclines. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors appeared to be safe. These data support the conducting of a randomized clinical trial testing SGLT2 inhibitors in patients at high cardiac risk treated with anthracyclines.

Survival of elderly patients with HER2+/HR- metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice: SEER-Medicare data 2012-2016

1039

Background: Older patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer(mBC) are underrepresented in clinical trials. We aim to assess the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival of elderly women with de novo HER2+/hormone receptor-negative (HR-) mBC in a real-world setting. Methods: Elderly women with HER2+/HR- mBC treated with chemotherapy and/or HER2-targeted agents and with continuous Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage 1-year before diagnosis were identified from the SEER-MEDICARE database 2012-2016. Patients were retrospectively followed from metastatic diagnosis until death, disenrollment from Medicare A, B, or D, or end of the observation period. Patients' year and month of diagnosis and death were retrieved from SEER. Death dates were verified with Medicare records reported by the Social Security Administration (SSA). For all-cause deaths, Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival. The cumulative incidence competing risk (CICR) method based on cumulative incidence function (CIF) was used to estimate breast cancer-specific death incidence. Results: Seventy-three patients (mean age at diagnosis, 75.0±7.7 years) met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 56 were treated with trastuzumab ± pertuzumab /chemotherapy as first-line treatment, and 17 were treated with chemotherapy only. The median time to initiate trastuzumab-based treatment from diagnosis was 2.5 months, and the longest trastuzumab treatment length was over 44 months. The median follow-up for OS was 13 months. One patient developed stomach cancer 6 months after breast cancer diagnosis. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, censoring or not censoring this patient after second cancer development resulted in a median OS of 19 months (95% CI, 9-24 months) and 18 months (95% CI, 9-22 months). The OS at the end of 46 months was approximately 25%. Five patients died from other causes, including lung cancer, cerebrovascular diseases, aortic aneurysm and dissection, pneumonia and influenza, and heart diseases during treatment. Considering these competing risks, 50% (95% CI, 36%-64%) of patients specifically died from breast cancer between 21 and 22 months, estimated by the CICR method. Conclusions: Our study observed a shorter OS among HER2+/HR- mBC elderly patients in clinical practice than the OS of 40.8 and 56.5 months among younger patients in the CLEOPATRA trial, suggesting that age is an important prognostic factor for breast cancer survival. The presence of second cancer and other competing risks led to overestimating the probabilities of breast cancer-specific death and resulted in a shorter OS using the Kaplan-Meier method. The CICR method is more relevant to estimate the breast-cancer-specific death incidence.

Major adverse cardiac event risk prediction model incorporating baseline cardiac disease, hypertension, and logarithmic left anterior descending coronary artery radiation dose in lung cancer (CHyLL)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) post-radiotherapy, mean heart dose (MHD) and the percent of left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery receiving ≥15Gy (LADV15) are associated with major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We developed a MACE prediction model in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 701 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with curative-intent radiotherapy reviewed, split by diagnosis date into "development" (n=500) and later (n=201) "test" cohorts. Development patients were analyzed using a multivariable Cox-proportional hazard model with backward elimination scheme (Bonferroni-adjusted α=0.025). Potential predictors were selected a priori: age, coronary heart disease (CHD), Framingham Risk, hypertension, MHD, LADV15, intensity modulated radiotherapy use, and CHD and LADV15 interaction (CHD:LADV15). Cardiac doses as quadratic, square root, and logarithmic (ln[X+1]) forms were explored. Models were internally validated with bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Final model incorporated CHD, Hypertension, Logarithmic LADV15, and CHD:ln[LADV15+1] (CHyLL; β coefficients: 5.51, 1.28, 1.48, -1.36; all p<0.006; bootstrapping c-index: 0.80; test cohort c-index: 0.76). Possible risk score range: 0-8.11. MACE incidence was 6.8% and 23.6% at 48 months (p=0.041), and survival rates were 51.6% and 35.0% (p=0.099), in the low-risk (score <5.00) and high-risk (score ≥5) test groups, respectively. Using the model, calculated LADV15 constraints for patients without CHD were 11.3% and 28.3% for those with and without hypertension, respectively, to remain low-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-existing CHD, hypertension, and LADV15 were important factors in predicting MACE after radiotherapy. CHyLL has the potential to estimate personalized LADV15 constraints based on cardiac risk factors and acceptable MACE thresholds.

Elevated Coronary Artery Calcium Quantified by a Validated Deep Learning Model From Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Planning Scans Predicts Mortality

PURPOSE

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) quantified on computed tomography (CT) scans is a robust predictor of atherosclerotic coronary disease; however, the feasibility and relevance of quantitating CAC from lung cancer radiotherapy planning CT scans is unknown. We used a previously validated deep learning (DL) model to assess whether CAC is a predictor of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of non-contrast-enhanced radiotherapy planning CT scans from 428 patients with locally advanced lung cancer is performed. The DL-CAC algorithm was previously trained on 1,636 cardiac-gated CT scans and tested on four clinical trial cohorts. Plaques ≥ 1 cubic millimeter were measured to generate an Agatston-like DL-CAC score and grouped as DL-CAC = 0 (very low risk) and DL-CAC ≥ 1 (elevated risk). Cox and Fine and Gray regressions were adjusted for lung cancer and cardiovascular factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 18.1 months. The majority (61.4%) had a DL-CAC ≥ 1. There was an increased risk of all-cause mortality with DL-CAC ≥ 1 versus DL-CAC = 0 (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.26; P = .04), with 2-year estimates of 56.2% versus 45.4%, respectively. There was a trend toward increased risk of major adverse cardiac events with DL-CAC ≥ 1 versus DL-CAC = 0 (hazard ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.74; P = .11), with 2-year estimates of 7.3% versus 1.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this proof-of-concept study, CAC was effectively measured from routinely acquired radiotherapy planning CT scans using an automated model. Elevated CAC, as predicted by the DL model, was associated with an increased risk of mortality, suggesting a potential benefit for automated cardiac risk screening before cancer therapy begins.

Usefulness of ventilatory inefficiency in predicting prognosis across the heart failure spectrum

Aims

The minute ventilation–carbon dioxide production relationship (VE/VCO₂ slope) is widely used for prognostication in heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study explored the prognostic value of VE/VCO₂ slope across the spectrum of HF defined by ranges of LVEF.

Methods and results

In this single‐centre retrospective observational study of 1347 patients with HF referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing, patients with HF were categorized into HF with reduced (HFrEF, LVEF < 40%, n = 598), mid‐range (HFmrEF, 40% ≤ LVEF < 50%, n = 164), and preserved (HFpEF, LVEF ≥ 50%, n = 585) LVEF. Four ventilatory efficiency categories (VC) were defined: VC‐I, VE/VCO₂ slope ≤ 29; VC‐II, 29 < VE/VCO₂ slope < 36; VC‐III, 36 ≤ VE/VCO₂ slope < 45; and VC‐IV, VE/VCO₂ slope ≥ 45. The associations of these VE/VCO₂ slope categories with a composite outcome of all‐cause mortality or HF hospitalization were evaluated for each category of LVEF. Over a median follow‐up of 2.0 (interquartile range: 1.9, 2.0) years, 201 patients experienced the composite outcome. Compared with patients in VC‐I, those in VC‐II, III, and IV demonstrated three‐fold, five‐fold, and eight‐fold increased risk for the composite outcome. This incremental risk was observed across HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF cohorts.

Conclusions

Higher VE/VCO₂ slope is associated with incremental risk of 2 year all‐cause mortality and HF hospitalization across the spectrum of HF defined by LVEF. A multilevel categorical approach to the interpretation of VE/VCO₂ slope may offer more refined risk stratification than the current binary approach employed in clinical practice.

Defining cardiovascular toxicities of cancer therapies: an International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) consensus statement

The discipline of Cardio-Oncology has seen tremendous growth over the past decade. It is devoted to the cardiovascular (CV) care of the cancer patient, especially to the mitigation and management of CV complications or toxicities of cancer therapies, which can have profound implications on prognosis. To that effect, many studies have assessed CV toxicities in patients undergoing various types of cancer therapies; however, direct comparisons have proven difficult due to lack of uniformity in CV toxicity endpoints. Similarly, in clinical practice, there can be substantial differences in the understanding of what constitutes CV toxicity, which can lead to significant variation in patient management and outcomes. This document addresses these issues and provides consensus definitions for the most commonly reported CV toxicities, including cardiomyopathy/heart failure and myocarditis, vascular toxicity, and hypertension, as well as arrhythmias and QTc prolongation. The current document reflects a harmonizing review of the current landscape in CV toxicities and the definitions used to define these. This consensus effort aims to provide a structure for definitions of CV toxicity in the clinic and for future research. It will be important to link the definitions outlined herein to outcomes in clinical practice and CV endpoints in clinical trials. It should facilitate communication across various disciplines to improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients with CV diseases.

Coronary vasomotor dysfunction in cancer survivors treated with thoracic irradiation

BACKGROUND

We sought to test the hypothesis that thoracic radiation therapy (RT) is associated with impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR), a measure of coronary vasomotor dysfunction.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied thirty-five consecutive patients (71% female, mean ± standard deviation (SD) age: 66 ± 11 years) referred clinically for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) myocardial perfusion imaging at a median (interquartile range, IQR) interval of 4.3 (2.1, 9.7) years following RT for a variety of malignancies. Radiation dose-volume histograms were generated for the heart and coronary arteries for each patient.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) of mean cardiac radiation doses was 12.0 (1.2, 24.2) Gray. There were significant inverse correlations between mean radiation dose and global MFR (MFRGlobal) and MFR in the left anterior descending artery territory (MFRLAD): Pearson's correlation coefficient = - .37 (P = .03) and - .38 (P = .03), respectively. For every one Gray increase in mean cardiac radiation dose, there was a mean ± standard error decrease of .02 ± .01 in MFRGlobal (P = .04) and MFRLAD (P = .03) after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a history of RT clinically referred for cardiac stress PET, we found an inverse correlation between mean cardiac radiation dose and coronary vasomotor function.

How to Treat Prostate Cancer With Androgen Deprivation and Minimize Cardiovascular Risk

•

Androgen deprivation therapy is associated with metabolic derangements due to profound hypogonadism that can increase the risk of CV disease in prostate cancer survivors.

•

Therapeutic advances have resulted in prolonged patient exposure to androgen deprivation therapy, thereby increasing CV complications for many prostate cancer survivors.

•

A systematic approach to monitoring and addressing reversible CV risk factors and purposeful engagement in multidisciplinary care between oncologists, urologists, and cardiologists is critical to optimizing CV outcomes in men with prostate cancer.

Pericardial disease in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

There are limited data on the occurrence, associations and outcomes of pericardial effusions and pericarditis after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Purpose

To evaluate incidence of pericardial disease in patients treated with an ICI.

Methods

This was a retrospective study at a single academic center that compared 2842 consecutive patients who received ICIs with 2699 age- and cancer-type matched patients with metastatic disease who did not receive ICI (design 1). A pericardial event was defined as a composite outcome of pericarditis and new or worsening moderate or large pericardial effusion. The endpoints were obtained through chart review and were blindly adjudicated. To identify risk factors associated with a pericardial event, in a second analysis, we also compared patients who developed an event on an ICI to patients treated with an ICI who did not develop a pericardial event (design 2). Cox proportional hazard model and logistical regression analysis were performed to study the association between ICI use and pericardial disease as well as pericardial disease and mortality. An additional 6-week landmark analysis was performed to account for lead-time bias.

Results

There were 42 pericardial events in the patients treated with ICI (n=2842) over 193 days (interquartile range 64 to 411) with an incidence rate of 1.57 events per 100 person-years. There was a 4-fold increase in the risk for pericarditis or a pericardial effusion among patients on an ICI compared to controls not treated with ICI after adjusting for potential confounders (hazard ratio [HR] 4.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–9.14, p&lt;0.001). Patients who developed pericardial disease while on an ICI had a trend for increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.99–2.36, p=0.05) compared to those who did not develop pericardial disease. When comparing those who developed pericardial disease after ICI treatment to those who did not, a higher dose of corticosteroid pre-ICI (&gt;0.7 mg/kg prednisone) was associated with increased risk of pericardial disease (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.00–6.57, p=0.049).

Conclusions

ICI use was associated with an increased risk for development of pericardial disease among cancer patients and a pericardial event on an ICI was associated with a trend towards increased mortality.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; a gift from A. Curt Greer and Pamela Kohlberg