1
|
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, Chieffo A, Christodorescu RM, Deaton C, Doenst T, Jones HW, Kunadian V, Mehilli J, Milojevic M, Piek JJ, Pugliese F, Rubboli A, Semb AG, Senior R, Ten Berg JM, Van Belle E, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Vidal-Perez R, Winther S. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2024:ehae177. [PMID: 39210710 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
|
2
|
Escaned J, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Shabbir A, Collet C, Lee JM, Appelman Y, Barbato E, Biscaglia S, Buszman PP, Campo G, Chieffo A, Colleran R, Collison D, Davies J, Giacoppo D, Holm NR, Jeremias A, Paradies V, Piróth Z, Raposo L, Roguin A, Rudolph T, Sarno G, Sen S, Toth GG, Van Belle E, Zimmermann FM, Dudek D, Stefanini G, Tarantini G. Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 19:464-481. [PMID: 37171503 PMCID: PMC10436072 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-23-00194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The clinical value of fractional flow reserve and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios are well established in determining an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, over the last 5 years we have witnessed a shift towards the use of physiology to enhance procedural planning, assess post-PCI functional results, and guide PCI optimisation. In this regard, clinical studies have reported compelling data supporting the use of longitudinal vessel analysis, obtained with pressure guidewire pullbacks, to better understand how obstructive CAD contributes to myocardial ischaemia, to establish the likelihood of functionally successful PCI, to identify the presence and location of residual flow-limiting stenoses and to predict long-term outcomes. The introduction of new functional coronary angiography tools, which merge angiographic information with fluid dynamic equations to deliver information equivalent to intracoronary pressure measurements, are now available and potentially also applicable to these endeavours. Furthermore, the ability of longitudinal vessel analysis to predict the functional results of stenting has played an integral role in the evolving field of simulated PCI. Nevertheless, it is important to have an awareness of the value and challenges of physiology-guided PCI in specific clinical and anatomical contexts. The main aim of this European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions clinical consensus statement is to offer up-to-date evidence and expert opinion on the use of applied coronary physiology for procedural PCI planning, disease pattern recognition and post-PCI optimisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Escaned
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos IdISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Colin Berry
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Bernard De Bruyne
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Center Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Asad Shabbir
- Hospital Clínico San Carlos IdISCC, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Collet
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yolande Appelman
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Barbato
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Biscaglia
- Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Piotr P Buszman
- Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Kraków University, Kraków, Poland
- American Heart of Poland, Ustroń, Poland
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Róisín Colleran
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Dublin and Department of Cardiology, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damien Collison
- West of Scotland Regional Heart & Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Daniele Giacoppo
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Dublin and Department of Cardiology, Mater Private Network, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Cardiology, Alto Vicentino Hospital, Santorso, Italy
- ISAResearch, German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niels R. Holm
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Valeria Paradies
- Department of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Zsolt Piróth
- Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Luís Raposo
- Unidade de Intervenção Cardiovascular, Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Ariel Roguin
- Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
| | - Tanja Rudolph
- Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | - Giovanna Sarno
- Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sayan Sen
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gabor G Toth
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Eric Van Belle
- Department of Interventional Cardiology for Coronary, Valves and Structural Heart Diseases, Institut Coeur Poumon, Lille, France
- Department of Cardiology, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Dariusz Dudek
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy
- Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Giulio Stefanini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodriguez-Leor O, Toledano B, López-Palop R, Rivero F, Brugaletta S, Linares JA, Benito T, Carrillo P, Puigfel M, Cediel G, Sadaba M, Vaquerizo B, Rondán J, Gómez I, Alfonso F, Sáez R, Planas A, Lozano F, Hernández F, Sabaté M, Ruíz-Arroyo JR, Torres F, de la Torre Hernández JM, Gutiérrez E, Cid-Álvarez AB, Díez JL, Fernández L, Moreu J, Ojeda S, Cerrato P, Ruiz-Quevedo V, Sanchis J, Gómez-Menchero A, Ocaranza R, Mohandes M, Hernández JM, Alfageme MM, Aguiar P, López Mínguez JR, Pérez de Prado A. Changes in the treatment strategy following intracoronary pressure wire in a contemporaneous real-life cohort of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. Results from a nationwide registry. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2023; 51:55-64. [PMID: 36822975 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracoronary pressure wire is useful to guide revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. AIMS To evaluate changes in diagnosis (coronary artery disease extent), treatment strategy and clinical results after intracoronary pressure wire study in real-life patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis. METHODS Observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients in whom pressure wire was performed. The extent of coronary artery disease and the treatment strategy based on clinical and angiographic criteria were recorded before and after intracoronary pressure wire guidance. 12-month incidence of MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or new revascularization of the target lesion) was assessed. RESULTS 1414 patients with 1781 lesions were included. Complications related to the procedure were reported in 42 patients (3.0 %). The extent of coronary artery disease changed in 771 patients (54.5 %). There was a change in treatment strategy in 779 patients (55.1 %) (18.0 % if medical treatment; 68.8 % if PCI; 58.9 % if surgery (p < 0.001 for PCI vs medical treatment; p = 0.041 for PCI vs CABG; p < 0.001 for medical treatment vs CABG)). In patients with PCI as the initial strategy, the change in strategy was associated with a lower rate of MACE (4.6 % vs 8.2 %, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS The use of intracoronary pressure wire was safe and led to the reclassification of the extent of coronary disease and change in the treatment strategy in more than half of the cases, especially in patients with PCI as initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Rodriguez-Leor
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades CardioVasculares (CIBERCV) Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Institut de Recerca en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
| | - Beatriz Toledano
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Rivero
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Salvatore Brugaletta
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tomás Benito
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de León, León, Spain
| | - Pilar Carrillo
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Sant Joan, Alacant, Spain
| | - Martí Puigfel
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Josep Trueta de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - German Cediel
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Mario Sadaba
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao, Spain
| | | | - Juan Rondán
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain
| | - Iván Gómez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Roberto Sáez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Basurto, Basurto, Spain
| | - Ana Planas
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Fernando Lozano
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Felipe Hernández
- Servicio de Cardiología, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manel Sabaté
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Enrique Gutiérrez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Belén Cid-Álvarez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - José Luís Díez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari de la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Fernández
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - José Moreu
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - Soledad Ojeda
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Pablo Cerrato
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital de Mérida, Mérida, Spain
| | | | - Juan Sanchis
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mohsen Mohandes
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
| | | | | | - Pablo Aguiar
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital San Pedro de Logroño, Logroño, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stables RH, Mullen LJ, Elguindy M, Nicholas Z, Aboul-Enien YH, Kemp I, O'Kane P, Hobson A, Johnson TW, Khan SQ, Wheatcroft SB, Garg S, Zaman AG, Mamas MA, Nolan J, Jadhav S, Berry C, Watkins S, Hildick-Smith D, Gunn J, Conway D, Hoye A, Fazal IA, Hanratty CG, De Bruyne B, Curzen N. Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Versus Conventional Angiography in the Management of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The RIPCORD 2 Trial. Circulation 2022; 146:687-698. [PMID: 35946404 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.057793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) has an established role in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. We tested the hypothesis that, at the stage of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography, systematic FFR-guided assessment of coronary artery disease would be superior, in terms of resource use and quality of life, to assessment by angiography alone. METHODS We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled trial in 17 UK centers, recruiting 1100 patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography for the investigation of stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Patients were randomized to either angiography alone (angiography) or angiography with systematic pressure wire assessment of all epicardial vessels >2.25 mm in diameter (angiography+FFR). The coprimary outcomes assessed at 1 year were National Health Service hospital costs and quality of life. Prespecified secondary outcomes included clinical events. RESULTS In the angiography+FFR arm, the median number of vessels examined was 4 (interquartile range, 3-5). The median hospital costs were similar: angiography, £4136 (interquartile range, £2613-£7015); and angiography+FFR, £4510 (£2721-£7415; P=0.137). There was no difference in median quality of life using the visual analog scale of the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L: angiography, 75 (interquartile range, 60-87); and angiography+FFR, 75 (interquartile range, 60-90; P=0.88). The number of clinical events was as follows: deaths, 5 versus 8; strokes, 3 versus 4; myocardial infarctions, 23 versus 22; and unplanned revascularizations, 26 versus 33, with a composite hierarchical event rate of 8.7% (48 of 552) for angiography versus 9.5% (52 of 548) for angiography+FFR (P=0.64). CONCLUSIONS A strategy of systematic FFR assessment compared with angiography alone did not result in a significant reduction in cost or improvement in quality of life. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT01070771.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney H Stables
- Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.)
| | - Liam J Mullen
- Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.)
| | - Mostafa Elguindy
- Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.)
| | - Zoe Nicholas
- Coronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton, UK (Z.N., N.C.)
| | | | - Ian Kemp
- Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, UK (R.H.S., L.J.M., M.E., Y.H.A.-E., I.K.)
| | | | - Alex Hobson
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK (A.H.)
| | | | | | | | - Scot Garg
- Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital, UK (S.G.)
| | | | - Mamas A Mamas
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stroke-on-Trent, UK (M.A.M., J.N.)
| | - James Nolan
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stroke-on-Trent, UK (M.A.M., J.N.)
| | | | - Colin Berry
- British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (C.B.)
| | | | | | - Julian Gunn
- Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK (J.G.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nick Curzen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK (N.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akbari T, Al-Lamee R. Percutaneous coronary intervention in multi-vessel disease. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 44:80-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
6
|
Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2022; 37:425-439. [PMID: 35543896 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-022-00863-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are widely accepted and recommended in Western and Japanese guidelines for appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention. There are, however, many differences in clinical situations between Japan and Western countries. Therefore, the Task Force on coronary physiology of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has proposed an expert consensus document to summarize current evidence and suggest the practical use of physiological lesion assessment in Japan.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bharmal M, Kern MJ, Kumar G, Seto AH. Physiologic Lesion Assessment to Optimize Multivessel Disease. Curr Cardiol Rep 2022; 24:541-550. [PMID: 35235145 PMCID: PMC9068635 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01675-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multivessel coronary artery disease, defined as significant stenosis in two or more major coronary arteries, is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis and treatment of multivessel disease have evolved in the PCI era from solely a visual estimation of ischemic risk to a functional evaluation during angiography. This review summarizes the evidence and discusses the commonly used methods of multivessel coronary artery stenosis physiologic assessment. RECENT FINDINGS While FFR remains the gold standard in coronary physiologic assessment, several pressure-wire-based non-hyperemic indices of functional stenosis have been developed and validated as well as wire-free angiographically derived quantitative flow ratio. Identifying and treating functionally significant coronary atherosclerotic lesions reduce symptoms and major adverse cardiovascular events. Coronary physiologic assessment in multivessel disease minimizes the observer bias in visual estimates of stenosis, changes clinical management, and improves patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Morton J. Kern
- University of California, Irvine, USA
- Veterans Administration Long Beach Health Care System, Long Beach, USA
| | - Gautam Kumar
- Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center, Atlanta, USA
- Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tomaniak M, Masdjedi K, Neleman T, Kucuk IT, Vermaire A, van Zandvoort LJC, Van Boven N, van Dalen BM, Soei LK, den Dekker WK, Kardys I, Wilschut JM, Diletti R, Zijlstra F, Van Mieghem NM, Daemen J. Three-dimensional QCA-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) in Heart Team decision-making: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054202. [PMID: 35379622 PMCID: PMC8981358 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of three-vessel three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) computation in patients discussed within the Heart Team in whom the treatment decision was based on angiography alone, and to evaluate the concordance between 3D QCA-based vessel FFR (vFFR)-confirmed functional lesion significance and revascularisation strategy as proposed by the Heart Team. DESIGN Retrospective, cohort. SETTING 3D QCA-based FFR indices have not yet been evaluated in the context of Heart Team decision-making; consecutive patients from six institutions were screened for eligibility and three-vessel vFFR was computed by blinded analysts. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients with chronic coronary syndrome or unstable angina referred for Heart Team consultation. Exclusion criteria involved: presentation with acute myocardial infarction (MI), significant valve disease, left ventricle ejection fraction <30%, inadequate quality of angiogram precluding vFFR computation in all three epicardial coronary arteries (ie, absence of a minimum of two angiographic projections with views of at least 30° apart, substantial foreshortening/overlap of the vessel, poor contrast medium injection, ostial lesions, chronic total occlusions). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Discordance between vFFR-confirmed lesion significance and revascularisation was assessed as the primary outcome measure. Rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, MI and clinically driven revascularisation were reported. RESULTS Of a total of 1003 patients were screened for eligibility, 416 patients (age 65.6±10.6, 71.2% male, 53% stable angina) were included. The most important reason for screening failure was insufficient quality of the angiogram (43%). Discordance between vFFR confirmed lesion significance and revascularisation was found in 124/416 patients (29.8%) corresponding to 149 vessels (46/149 vessels (30.9%) were reclassified as significant and 103/149 vessels (69.1%) as non-significant by vFFR). Over a median of 962 days, the cumulative incidence of MACE was 29.7% versus 18.5% in discordant versus concordant patients (p=0.031). CONCLUSIONS vFFR computation is feasible in around 40% of the patients referred for Heart Team discussion, a limitation that is mostly based on insufficient quality of the angiogram. Three vessel vFFR screening indicated discordance between vFFR confirmed lesion significance and revascularisation in 29.8% of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariusz Tomaniak
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kaneshka Masdjedi
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tara Neleman
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ibrahim T Kucuk
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alise Vermaire
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurens J C van Zandvoort
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nick Van Boven
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas M van Dalen
- Sint Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Loe Kie Soei
- Sint Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wijnand K den Dekker
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Isabella Kardys
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M Wilschut
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roberto Diletti
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Felix Zijlstra
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Daemen
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Thorax Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nakano S, Kohsaka S, Chikamori T, Fukushima K, Kobayashi Y, Kozuma K, Manabe S, Matsuo H, Nakamura M, Ohno T, Sawano M, Toda K, Ueda Y, Yokoi H, Gatate Y, Kasai T, Kawase Y, Matsumoto N, Mori H, Nakazato R, Niimi N, Saito Y, Shintani A, Watanabe I, Watanabe Y, Ikari Y, Jinzaki M, Kosuge M, Nakajima K, Kimura T. JCS 2022 Guideline Focused Update on Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Circ J 2022; 86:882-915. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-21-1041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Nakano
- Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | | | | | - Kenji Fukushima
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University
| | | | - Ken Kozuma
- Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine
| | - Susumu Manabe
- Cardiac Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital
| | | | - Masato Nakamura
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
| | | | | | - Koichi Toda
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yasunori Ueda
- Cardiovascular Division, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital
| | - Hiroyoshi Yokoi
- Cardiovascular Center, International University of Health and Welfare Fukuoka Sanno Hospital
| | - Yodo Gatate
- Cardiology, Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital
| | | | | | | | - Hitoshi Mori
- Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | | | | | - Yuichi Saito
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University School of Medicine
| | - Ayumi Shintani
- Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Ippei Watanabe
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University School of Medicine
| | | | - Yuji Ikari
- Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Kenichi Nakajima
- Functional Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Kanazawa University
| | - Takeshi Kimura
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Van Belle E, Teles RC, Pyxaras SA, Kalpak O, Johnson TW, Barbash I, De Luca G, Kostov J, Parma R, Vincent F, Brugaletta S, Debry N, Toth G, Ghazzal Z, Deharo P, Milasinovic D, Kaspar K, Saia F, Mauri Ferre J, Kammler J, Muir D, O'Connor S, Mehilli J, Thiele H, Weilenmann D, Witt N, Joshi F, Kharbanda RKK, Piroth Z, Wojakowski W, Geppert A, Di Gioia G, Pires-Morais G, Petronio A, Estévez-Loureiro R, Ruzsa Z, Kefer J, Kunadian V, Van Mieghem N, Windecker S, Baumbach A, Haude M, Dudek D. EAPCI Core Curriculum for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (2020): Committee for Education and Training European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). A branch of the European Society of Cardiology. EUROINTERVENTION 2021; 17:23-31. [PMID: 32624457 PMCID: PMC9725044 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-18-00448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The proposed 2020 Core Curriculum for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions aims to provide an updated European consensus that defines the level of experience and knowledge in the field of percutaneous cardiovascular intervention (PCI). It promotes homogenous education and training programmes among countries, and is the cornerstone of the new EAPCI certification, designed to support the recognition of competencies at the European level and the free movement of certified specialists in the European Community. It is based on a thorough review of the ESC guidelines and of the EAPCI textbook on percutaneous interventional cardiovascular medicine. The structure of the current core curriculum evolved from previous EAPCI core curricula and from the "2013 core curriculum of the general cardiologist" to follow the current ESC recommendations for core curricula. In most subject areas, there was a wide - if not unanimous - consensus among the task force members on the training required for the interventional cardiologist of the future. The document recommends that acquisition of competence in interventional cardiology requires at least two years of postgraduate training, in addition to four years devoted to cardiology. The first part of the curriculum covers general aspects of training and is followed by a comprehensive description of the specific components in 54 chapters. Each of the chapters includes statements of the objectives, and is further subdivided into the required knowledge, skills, behaviours, and attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Van Belle
- Institut Coeur Poumon (Heart and Lung Institute), Bd du Pr Leclercq, CHU Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Rui Campante Teles
- Hospital de Santa Cruz CHLO, Carnaxide, Portugal; CEDOC, Nova Medical School, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - Israel Barbash
- Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Giuseppe De Luca
- AOU Maggiore della Carità, Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Radoslaw Parma
- Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Flavien Vincent
- CHRU Lille, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Department of Cardiology, Lille, France
| | - Salvatore Brugaletta
- Hospital Clinic, Cardiovascular Clinic Institute, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicolas Debry
- CHRU Lille, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Department of Cardiology, Lille, France
| | - Gabor Toth
- University Heart Center Graz, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ziyad Ghazzal
- American University of Beirut Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, Lebanon
| | | | - Dejan Milasinovic
- Clinical Center of Serbia, Department of Cardiology, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Francesco Saia
- Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Department University Hospital of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola - Malpighi (Pav. 23), Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Jürgen Kammler
- Med Campus III., Kepler University Hospital Linz, Faculty of Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Douglas Muir
- The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | | | - Julinda Mehilli
- Med. Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universitaet, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich Heart Alliance at DZHK, Munich, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Daniel Weilenmann
- Department of Cardiology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Nils Witt
- Department of clinical science and education, Karolinska Institute, Division of cardiology Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Francis Joshi
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Zsolt Piroth
- Hungarian Institute of Cardiology, Haller street, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Wojciech Wojakowski
- Department of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | | | - Gustavo Pires-Morais
- Cardiovascular Intervention Unit, Department of Cardiology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Anna Petronio
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Dpt. AOUP,University of Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Zoltan Ruzsa
- Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Joelle Kefer
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Vijay Kunadian
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University and Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Nicolas Van Mieghem
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Baumbach
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Haude
- Med. Klinik I, Städtische Kliniken Neuss, Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH, Neuss, Germany
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Jagiellonian University Medical College in Poland, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Argacha JF, Decamp J, Vandeloo B, Babin D, Lochy S, Van den Bussche K, de Hemptinne Q, Xaplanteris P, Magne J, Segers P, Cosyns B. Guiding Myocardial Revascularization by Algorithmic Interpretation of FFR Pullback Curves: A Proof of Concept Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:623841. [PMID: 33778020 PMCID: PMC7990785 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.623841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease distribution along the vessel is a main determinant of FFR improvement after PCI. Identifying focal from diffuse disease from visual inspections of coronary angiogram (CA) and FFR pullback (FFR-PB) are operator-dependent. Computer science may standardize interpretations of such curves. Methods: A virtual stenting algorithm (VSA) was developed to perform an automated FFR-PB curve analysis. A survey analysis of the evaluations of 39 vessels with intermediate disease on CA and a distal FFR <0.8, rated by 5 interventional cardiologists, was performed. Vessel disease distribution and PCI strategy were successively rated based on CA and distal FFR (CA); CA and FFR-PB curve (CA/FFR-PB); and CA and VSA (CA/VSA). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Fleiss kappa and an agreement analysis of CA/VSA rating with both algorithmic and human evaluation (operator) was performed. We hypothesize that VSA would increase rater agreement in interpretation of epicardial disease distribution and subsequent evaluation of PCI eligibility. Results: Inter-rater reliability in vessel disease assessment by CA, CA/FFR-PB, and CA/VSA were respectively, 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.47), 0.38 (95% CI: 0.23-0.53), and 0.4 (95% CI: 0.25-0.55). The raters' overall agreement in vessel disease distribution and PCI eligibility was higher with the VSA than with the operator (respectively, 67 vs. 42%, and 80 vs. 70%, both p < 0.05). Compared to CA/FFR-PB, CA/VSA induced more reclassification toward a focal disease (92 vs. 56.2%, p < 0.01) with a trend toward more reclassification as eligible for PCI (70.6 vs. 33%, p = 0.06). Change in PCI strategy did not differ between CA/FFR-PB and CA/VSA (23.6 vs. 28.5%, p = 0.38). Conclusions: VSA is a new program to facilitate and standardize the FFR pullback curves analysis. When expert reviewers integrate VSA data, their assessments are less variable which might help to standardize PCI eligibility and strategy evaluations. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03824600.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Argacha
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Decamp
- Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bert Vandeloo
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Danilo Babin
- imec-TELIN-IPI, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stijn Lochy
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Karen Van den Bussche
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Quentin de Hemptinne
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Panagiotis Xaplanteris
- Department of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julien Magne
- Department of Cardiology, Dupuytren University Hospital 2, Limoges, France.,INSERM U1094 and IRD, Limoges University, Limoges, France
| | - Patrick Segers
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, IBiTech-bioMMeda, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bernard Cosyns
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of an Interactive CT/FFR CT Interventional Planner on Coronary Artery Disease Management Decision Making. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 14:1068-1070. [PMID: 33454253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
13
|
Van Belle E, Cosenza A, Baptista SB, Vincent F, Henderson J, Santos L, Ramos R, Pouillot C, Calé R, Cuisset T, Jorge E, Teiger E, Machado C, Belle L, Costa M, Barreau D, Oliveira E, Hanssen M, Costa J, Besnard C, Nunes L, Dallongeville J, Sideris G, Bretelle C, Fonseca N, Lhoest N, Guardado J, Silva B, Sousa MJ, Barnay P, Silva JC, Leborgne L, Rodrigues A, Porouchani S, Seca L, Fernandes R, Dupouy P, Raposo L. Usefulness of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve for Clinical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes. JAMA Cardiol 2021; 5:272-281. [PMID: 31913433 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Approximately one-third of patients considered for coronary revascularization have diabetes, which is a major determinant of clinical outcomes, often influencing the choice of the revascularization strategy. The usefulness of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide treatment in this population is understudied and has been questioned. Objective To evaluate the usefulness and rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of integrating FFR in management decisions for patients with diabetes who undergo coronary angiography. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the PRIME-FFR study derived from the merger of the POST-IT study (Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease [March 2012-November 2013]) and R3F study (French Study of FFR Integrated Multicenter Registries Implementation of FFR in Routine Practice [October 2008-June 2010]), 2 prospective multicenter registries that shared a common design. A population of all-comers for whom angiography disclosed ambiguous lesions was analyzed for rates, patterns, and outcomes associated with management reclassification, including revascularization deferral, in patients with vs without diabetes. Data analysis was performed from June to August 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures Death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization (MACE) at 1 year. Results Among 1983 patients (1503 [77%] male; mean [SD] age, 65 [10] years), 701 had diabetes, and FFR was performed for 1.4 lesions per patient (58.2% of lesions in the left anterior descending artery; mean [SD] stenosis, 56% [11%]; mean [SD] FFR, 0.81 [0.01]). Reclassification by FFR was high and similar in patients with and without diabetes (41.2% vs 37.5%, P = .13), but reclassification from medical treatment to revascularization was more frequent in the former (142 of 342 [41.5%] vs 230 of 730 [31.5%], P = .001). There was no statistical difference between the 1-year rates of MACE in reclassified (9.7%) and nonreclassified patients (12.0%) (P = .37). Among patients with diabetes, FFR-based deferral identified patients with a lower risk of MACE at 12 months (25 of 296 [8.4%]) compared with those undergoing revascularization (47 of 257 [13.1%]) (P = .04), and the rate was of the same magnitude of the observed rate among deferred patients without diabetes (7.9%, P = .87). Status of insulin treatment had no association with outcomes. Patients (6.6% of the population) in whom FFR was disregarded had the highest MACE rates regardless of diabetes status. Conclusions and Relevance Routine integration of FFR for the management of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes may be associated with a high rate of treatment reclassification. Management strategies guided by FFR, including revascularization deferral, may be useful for patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Van Belle
- Département de Cardiologie, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.,Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale INSERM U1011, Lille-II-University, Lille, France
| | - Alessandro Cosenza
- Département de Cardiologie, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.,Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale INSERM U1011, Lille-II-University, Lille, France
| | - Sergio Bravo Baptista
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Prof Doutor Fernando da Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal.,University Clinic of Cardiology-Faculty of Medicine at University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Flavien Vincent
- Département de Cardiologie, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.,Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale INSERM U1011, Lille-II-University, Lille, France
| | - John Henderson
- Statistical Department, St. Jude Medical Inc, St Paul, Minnesota
| | - Lino Santos
- Serviço de Cardiologie, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| | - Ruben Ramos
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Santa Marta-Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Christophe Pouillot
- Department de Cardiologia, Clinique Sainte Clotilde, Saint Denis de la Réunion, France
| | - Rita Calé
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Thomas Cuisset
- Department de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalar Universitaire, La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Elisabete Jorge
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário, Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Emmanuel Teiger
- Department of Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalar Universitaire Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Carina Machado
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Divino Espirito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Loic Belle
- Department de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier d'Annecy, Annecy, France
| | - Marco Costa
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Geral dos Covões-Centro Hospitalar Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Didier Barreau
- Department of Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer-Hôpital Sainte Musse, Toulon, France
| | - Eduardo Oliveira
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Santa Maria-Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Michel Hanssen
- Department de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Haguenau, Haguenau, France
| | - João Costa
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal
| | - Cyril Besnard
- Department of Cardiologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France
| | - Luis Nunes
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital São Teotónio, Viseu, Portugal
| | - Jean Dallongeville
- Institut Pasteur de Lille, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale INSERM, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Nuno Fonseca
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Setúbal, Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Nicolas Lhoest
- Department of Cardiologie, Hôpital Albert Schweizer, Colmar, France
| | - Jorge Guardado
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Santo André-Centro Hospitalar Leiria-Pombal, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Bruno Silva
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Dr Nélio Mendonça, Funchal, Portugal
| | - Maria-João Sousa
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Geral Santo António-Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pierre Barnay
- Department of Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier La Durance, Avignon, France
| | | | - Laurent Leborgne
- Department of Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Amiens Sud, Amiens, France
| | - Alberto Rodrigues
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel, Portugal
| | - Sina Porouchani
- Département de Cardiologie, Institut Coeur-Poumon, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Luís Seca
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Centro Hospitalar Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro-Unidade Hospitalar Vila Real, Vila Real, Portugal
| | - Renato Fernandes
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital Espírito Santo, Évora, Portugal
| | - Patrick Dupouy
- Department of Cardiologie, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, Antony, France
| | - Luís Raposo
- Serviço de Cardiologia, Hospital de Santa Cruz-Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Carnaxide, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
van de Hoef TP, de Waard GA, Meuwissen M, Voskuil M, Chamuleau SAJ, van Royen N, Piek JJ. Invasive coronary physiology: a Dutch tradition. Neth Heart J 2020; 28:99-107. [PMID: 32780339 PMCID: PMC7419414 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-020-01461-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Invasive coronary physiology has been applied since the early days of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and has become a rapidly emerging field of research. Many physiology indices have been developed, tested in clinical studies, and are now applied in daily clinical practice. Recent clinical practice guidelines further support the use of advanced invasive physiology methods to optimise the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. This article provides a succinct review of the history of invasive coronary physiology, the basic concepts of currently available physiological parameters, and will particularly highlight the Dutch contribution to this field of invasive coronary physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T P van de Hoef
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - G A de Waard
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Meuwissen
- Department of Cardiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - M Voskuil
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S A J Chamuleau
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N van Royen
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J J Piek
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schamroth Pravda N, Witberg G, Zusman O, Landes U, Bental T, Assali A, Vaknin Assa H, Greenberg G, Codner P, Perl L, Kornowski R. A risk score based on simple angiographic characteristics to aid in choosing the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with multivessel disease presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis 2020; 31:597-605. [PMID: 32271245 DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal revascularization strategy is not clearly defined for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease (MV-STEMI). We aimed to develop a simple angiographic risk score for identifying patients with MV-STEMI that might benefit from a multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MV-PCI), compared to a PCI for only the infarct-related artery (IRA-PCI). METHODS AND RESULTS This retrospective study acquired data from a single-center STEMI registry on 841 consecutive patients with MV-STEMI (645 IRA-PCI and 196 MV-PCI). Patients were stratified according to high- and low-risk scores. We devised a score based on three characteristics of non-culprit lesions previously reported to predict overall mortality (proximal left anterior descending artery involvement, maximal % stenosis, and number of involved vessels). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs: a composite of death/MI/urgent repeat revascularization). After a median follow-up of 1909 days, MACE occurred in 205/841 (24.4%) patients. MACE risk was higher in the high-risk than in the low-risk group (HR 1.43, P < 0.001). In comparing the IRA-PCI and MV-PCI approaches within each risk group, we found that these revascularization strategies had differential effects on outcome. Compared to the MV-PCI, IRA-PCI was associated with less MACE in the low-risk group (HR 0.597, P = 0.033), and more MACE in the high-risk group (HR 3.14, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION For patients with MV-STEMI that undergo primary PCI, a simple risk score based on three angiographic characteristics could identify patients at high risk of future adverse events. This score might facilitate choosing the optimal revascularization strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nili Schamroth Pravda
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Guy Witberg
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Oren Zusman
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Uri Landes
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamir Bental
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Abid Assali
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hana Vaknin Assa
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Gabriel Greenberg
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Pablo Codner
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Leor Perl
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ran Kornowski
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva.,The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:962-964. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
17
|
Andell P, Berntorp K, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Venetsanos D, Erlinge D, Fröbert O, Koul S, Reitan C, Götberg M. Reclassification of Treatment Strategy With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve: A Substudy From the iFR-SWEDEHEART Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 11:2084-2094. [PMID: 30336812 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The authors sought to compare reclassification of treatment strategy following instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND iFR was noninferior to FFR in 2 large randomized controlled trials in guiding coronary revascularization. Reclassification of treatment strategy by FFR is well-studied, but similar reports on iFR are lacking. METHODS The iFR-SWEDEHEART (Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris or Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial) study randomized 2,037 participants with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome to treatment guided by iFR or FFR. Interventionalists entered the preferred treatment (optimal medical therapy [OMT], percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) on the basis of coronary angiograms, and the final treatment decision was mandated by the iFR/FFR measurements. RESULTS In the iFR/FFR (n = 1,009/n = 1,004) populations, angiogram-based treatment approaches were similar (p = 0.50) with respect to OMT (38%/35%), PCI of 1 (37%/39%), 2 (15%/16%), and 3 vessels (2%/2%) and CABG (8%/8%). iFR and FFR reclassified 40% and 41% of patients, respectively (p = 0.78). The majority of reclassifications were conversion of PCI to OMT in both the iFR/FFR groups (31.4%/29.0%). Reclassification increased with increasing number of lesions evaluated (odds ratio per evaluated lesion for FFR: 1.46 [95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 1.76] vs. iFR 1.37 [95% confidence interval: 1.18 to 1.59]). Reclassification rates for patients with 1, 2, and 3 assessed vessels were 36%, 52%, and 53% (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Reclassification of treatment strategy of intermediate lesions was common and occurred in 40% of patients with iFR or FFR. The most frequent reclassification was conversion from PCI to OMT regardless of physiology modality. Irrespective of the physiological index reclassification of angiogram-based treatment strategy increased with the number of lesions evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pontus Andell
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Karolina Berntorp
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Lennart Sandhall
- Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Venetsanos
- Departments of Cardiology and of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - David Erlinge
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ole Fröbert
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Sasha Koul
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christian Reitan
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Matthias Götberg
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shenouda RB, Bytyçi I, Sobhy M, Henein MY. Reduced regional strain rate is the most accurate dysfunction in predicting culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2019; 40:21-29. [PMID: 31549763 DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Predicting culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could be a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) using various echocardiographic techniques and ECG changes in predicting the culprit coronary lesion in a group of patients with ACS. METHODS In 80 consecutive patients with ACS (age 55·7 ± 9·4 years, 77% male, 15% with CCS Angina III), an echocardiographic examination of left ventricle (LV) RWMA, tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking myocardial strain and strain rate (SR) were performed before intervention. RESULTS Of the 80 patients, one-vessel stenosis (>70%) was present in 53 (66%), two-vessel disease in 12 (15%) and multivessel disease in 15 patients (19%). About 51% of patients had hypertension, 40% diabetes and 23% dyslipidaemia. There was no relationship between individual segmental RWMA and SR. Mean regional SR, but not peak strain, correlated with culprit lesion branch: left anterior descending - LAD (r = 0·35, P = 0·005), circumflex LCx (r = 0·32, P = 0·03) and right coronary RCA (r = 0·37, P = 0·01). Only ECG changes in the LAD territory (r = 0·26, P = 0·04) correlated with the culprit lesion. SR of LAD territories ≤-0·74 was 71% sensitive and 70% specific (AUC = 0·70, CI = 0·67-0·93, P = 0·01), SR of LCx territories of ≤-0·67 was 75% sensitive and 63% specific (AUC = 0·72, CI = 0·58-0·87, P = 0·02) and SR of RCA territories ≤-0·83 was 73% sensitive and 71% specific (AUC = 0·80, CI = 0·66-0·93, P = 0·001) in predicting significant stenosis. SR was more accurate than all other techniques in predicting the culprit lesion. CONCLUSION In ACS, mean regional speckle tracking SR is more sensitive than peak strain, TDI, ECG changes and wall motion abnormalities in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafik B Shenouda
- International Cardiac Centre, Alexandria, Egypt.,Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ibadete Bytyçi
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Clinic of Cardiology, University Clinical Centre of Kosova, Prishtina, Albania
| | - Mohammed Sobhy
- International Cardiac Centre, Alexandria, Egypt.,Cardiology Department, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Michael Y Henein
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Molecular and Clinic Research Institute, St George University, London, UK.,Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lee HS, Lee JM, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Dai N, Ng MKC, Yong ASC, Tresukosol D, Mullasari AS, Mathew R, Chandra P, Wang KT, Chen Y, Chen J, Yiu KH, Johnson NP, Koo BK. Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries. Cardiol J 2019; 26:215-225. [PMID: 31225632 DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2019.0054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, invasive physiologic assessment such as fractional flow reserve is widely used worldwide with different adoption rates around the globe. Patient characteristics and physician preferences often differ in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with respect to treatment strategy, techniques, lesion complexity, access to coronary physiology and imaging devices, as well as patient management. Thus, there is a need to construct a consensus document on recommendations for use of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in APAC populations. This document serves as an overview of recommendations describing the best practices for APAC populations to achieve more consistent and optimal clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS A comprehensive multiple-choice questionnaire was provided to 20 interven- tional cardiologists from 10 countries in the APAC region. Clinical evidence, tips and techniques, and clinical situations for the use of physiology-guided PCI in APAC were reviewed and used to propose key recommendations. There are suggestions to continue to develop evidence for lesion and patient types that will benefit from physiology, develop directions for future research in health economics and local data, develop appropriate use criteria in different countries, and emphasize the importance of education of all stakeholders. A consensus recommendation to enhance the penetration of invasive physiology-based therapy was to adopt the 5E approach: Evidence, Education, Expand hardware, Economics and Expert consensus. CONCLUSIONS This consensus document and recommendations support interventional fellows and cardiologists, hospital administrators, patients, and medical device companies to build confidence and encourage wider implementation of invasive coronary physiology-guided therapy in the APAC region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hak Seung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Myung Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Wook Nam
- Department of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Seok Shin
- Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Joon-Hyung Doh
- Department of Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Neng Dai
- Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Martin K C Ng
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Andy S C Yong
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Damras Tresukosol
- Division of Cardiology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ajit S Mullasari
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, The Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India
| | | | | | - Kuang-Te Wang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taitung Branch, Taiwan
| | - Yundai Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiyan Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai-Hang Yiu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Nils P Johnson
- McGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Bon-Kwon Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Davies RE, Abbott JD. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Developments in the Last 12 Months. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2019. [DOI: 10.15420/usc.2019.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2018, there were several studies that significantly added to the field of interventional cardiology. Research was focused on understanding the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in various clinical syndromes, optimizing outcomes for high-risk lesion subsets, and building an evidence base for greater adoption of PCI guided by physiology and intracoronary imaging. In the area of innovation, novel and iterative developments in drug-eluting stents (DES) and scaffold platforms were compared with current generation DES. This article summarizes the research from last year which has had the most impact on PCI techniques and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhian E Davies
- Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI
| | - J Dawn Abbott
- Division of Cardiology, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Younus M, Seto AH. Clinical Outcomes Data for Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Interv Cardiol Clin 2019; 8:121-129. [PMID: 30832937 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccl.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) is a vasodilator-free index of coronary blood flow used for revascularization decision-making. iFR-based revascularization also had a decreased rate of adverse effects from vasodilators, shorter procedure times, and lower revascularization rates. iFR-pullback predicts post-percutaneous coronary intervention physiologic outcomes in tandem and diffuse coronary lesions. iFR may be particularly useful in patients with potential adenosine resistance, contraindications to adenosine, and multivessel or serial lesions. iFR is a useful tool both with and without fractional-flow reserve for revascularization planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masood Younus
- Department of Medicine, University of California, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Arnold H Seto
- Department of Medicine, University of California, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, CA 92868, USA; Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Long Beach Health Care System, 5901 East 7th Street, 111C, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Omori H, Witberg G, Kawase Y, Tanigaki T, Okamoto S, Hirata T, Sobue Y, Ota H, Kamiya H, Okubo M, Valzer O, Kornowski R, Matsuo H. Angiogram based fractional flow reserve in patients with dual/triple vessel coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2019; 283:17-22. [PMID: 30819589 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of angiography derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFRangio) in multivessel disease (MVD) patients undergoing angiography. BACKGROUND FFR is the reference standard for physiologic assessment of coronary stenosis and guidance of revascularization, especially in patients with MVD, yet it remains grossly underutilized. The non-wire based FFRangio performs well in non-MVD patients, but its accuracy in MVD is unknown. METHODS A prospective clinical study was conducted at Gifu Heart Centre, Japan. Patients underwent physiologic assessment of all relevant coronary lesions using wire-based FFR (wbFFR) and FFRangio. Primary outcome was diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) for FFRangio with wbFFR as reference. Other outcomes were the correlation between wbFFR/FFRangio, time required for wbFFR/FFRangio measurements, and the effect of wbFFR/FFRangio on the reclassification of coronary disease severity. RESULTS Fifty patients (118 lesions in total) were included. Mean age was 72 ± 9 years, 72% were male, 36% had triple vessel disease and the average SYNTAX score was 13. The mean measurement of wbFFR and FFRangio were 0.83 ± 0.12 and 0.81 ± 0.11, respectively. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for FFRangio were 92.3% (95% CI 79.1-98.4%), 92.4% (95% CI 84.3-97.2%) and 92.4% (95% CI 87.4-97.3%), respectively. Pearson's r between wbFFR and FFRangio was 0.83. FFRangio measurement was faster than wbFFR (9.6 ± 3.4 vs. 15.0 ± 8.9 min, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with MVD, FFRangio shows good correlation and excellent diagnostic performance compared to wbFFR, and measuring FFRangio is faster than wbFFR. These results highlight the potential clinical benefits of utilizing FFRangio among patients with MVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Omori
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - G Witberg
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Y Kawase
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - T Tanigaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - S Okamoto
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - T Hirata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Y Sobue
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - H Ota
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - H Kamiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - M Okubo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - O Valzer
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; CathWorks, Kfar-Saba, Israel
| | - R Kornowski
- Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - H Matsuo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kawase Y, Matsuo H, Akasaka T, Shiono Y, Tanaka N, Amano T, Kozuma K, Nakamura M, Yokoi H, Kobayashi Y, Ikari Y. Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2018; 34:85-96. [PMID: 30588572 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-018-0559-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
In this document, the background, concept, and current evidence are briefly summarized. The focus is on the clinical application of physiological lesion assessment from a practical standpoint for facilities that do not have ample experience. Finally, the characteristics of new resting indexes are summarized.
Collapse
|
24
|
Reclassification of Treatment Strategy by Routine Coronary Pressure Assessment-Episode 7 of the Saga: The More You Look, the More You Find It! JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:2095-2098. [PMID: 30336813 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
25
|
Koo BK. Treatment Strategy Change After Routine Pressure Wire Assessment for Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:366-368. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|