Coronary Obstruction After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the Spanish TAVI Registry

BACKGROUND

Coronary obstruction (CO) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a life-threatening complication, scarcely studied.

OBJECTIVES

The authors analyzed the incidence of CO after TAVR, presentation, management, and in-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes in a large series of patients undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

Patients from the Spanish TAVI (Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) registry who presented with CO in the procedure, during hospitalization or at follow-up were included. Computed tomography (CT) risk factors were assessed. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year all-cause mortality rates were analyzed and compared with patients without CO using logistic regression models in the overall cohort and in a propensity score-matched cohort.

RESULTS

Of 13,675 patients undergoing TAVR, 115 (0.80%) presented with a CO, mainly during the procedure (83.5%). The incidence of CO was stable throughout the study period (2009-2021), with a median annual rate of 0.8% (range 0.3%-1.3%). Preimplantation CT scans were available in 105 patients (91.3%). A combination of at least 2 CT-based risk factors was less frequent in native than in valve-in-valve patients (31.7% vs 78.3%; P < 0.01). Percutaneous coronary intervention was the treatment of choice in 100 patients (86.9%), with a technical success of 78.0%. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates were higher in CO patients than in those without CO (37.4% vs 4.1%, 38.3% vs 4.3%, and 39.1% vs 9.1%, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, nationwide TAVR registry, CO was a rare, but often fatal, complication that did not decrease over time. The lack of identifiable predisposing factors in a subset of patients and the frequently challenging treatment when established may partly explain these findings.

Changes in the treatment strategy following intracoronary pressure wire in a contemporaneous real-life cohort of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. Results from a nationwide registry

BACKGROUND

Intracoronary pressure wire is useful to guide revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease.

AIMS

To evaluate changes in diagnosis (coronary artery disease extent), treatment strategy and clinical results after intracoronary pressure wire study in real-life patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis.

METHODS

Observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients in whom pressure wire was performed. The extent of coronary artery disease and the treatment strategy based on clinical and angiographic criteria were recorded before and after intracoronary pressure wire guidance. 12-month incidence of MACE (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or new revascularization of the target lesion) was assessed.

RESULTS

1414 patients with 1781 lesions were included. Complications related to the procedure were reported in 42 patients (3.0 %). The extent of coronary artery disease changed in 771 patients (54.5 %). There was a change in treatment strategy in 779 patients (55.1 %) (18.0 % if medical treatment; 68.8 % if PCI; 58.9 % if surgery (p < 0.001 for PCI vs medical treatment; p = 0.041 for PCI vs CABG; p < 0.001 for medical treatment vs CABG)). In patients with PCI as the initial strategy, the change in strategy was associated with a lower rate of MACE (4.6 % vs 8.2 %, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intracoronary pressure wire was safe and led to the reclassification of the extent of coronary disease and change in the treatment strategy in more than half of the cases, especially in patients with PCI as initial treatment.

Early clinical outcomes after transaxillary versus transfemoral TAVI. Data from the Spanish TAVI registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Transaxillary access (TXA) has become the most widely used alternative to transfemoral access (TFA) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to compare total in-hospital and 30-day mortality in patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry who were treated by TXA or TFA access.

METHODS

We analyzed data from patients treated with TXA or TFA and who were included in the TAVI Spanish registry. In-hospital and 30-day events were defined according to the recommendations of the Valve Academic Research Consortium. The impact of the access route was evaluated by propensity score matching according to clinical and echocardiogram characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 6603 patients were included; 191 (2.9%) were treated via TXA and 6412 via TFA access. After adjustment (n=113 TXA group and n=3035 TFA group) device success was similar between the 2 groups (94%, TXA vs 95%, TFA; P=.95). However, compared with the TFA group, the TXA group showed a higher rate of acute myocardial infarction (OR, 5.3; 95%CI, 2.0-13.8); P=.001), renal complications (OR, 2.3; 95%CI, 1.3-4.1; P=.003), and pacemaker implantation (OR, 1.6; 95%CI, 1.01-2.6; P=.03). The TXA group also had higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates (OR, 2.2; 95%CI, 1.04-4.6; P=.039 and OR, 2.3; 95%CI, 1.2-4.5; P=.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ATF, TXA is associated with higher total mortality, both in-hospital and at 30 days. Given these results, we believe that TXA should be considered only in those patients who are not suitable candidates for TFA.

Mortality risk assessment in Spain and Italy, insights of the HOPE COVID-19 registry

Recently the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has been declared a pandemic. Despite its aggressive extension and significant morbidity and mortality, risk factors are poorly characterized outside China. We designed a registry, HOPE COVID-19 (NCT04334291), assessing data of 1021 patients discharged (dead or alive) after COVID-19, from 23 hospitals in 4 countries, between 8 February and 1 April. The primary end-point was all-cause mortality aiming to produce a mortality risk score calculator. The median age was 68 years (IQR 52-79), and 59.5% were male. Most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (46.8%) and dyslipidemia (35.8%). A relevant heart or lung disease were depicted in 20%. And renal, neurological, or oncological disease, respectively, were detected in nearly 10%. Most common symptoms were fever, cough, and dyspnea at admission. 311 patients died and 710 were discharged alive. In the death-multivariate analysis, raised as most relevant: age, hypertension, obesity, renal insufficiency, any immunosuppressive disease, 02 saturation < 92% and an elevated C reactive protein (AUC = 0.87; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p > 0.999; bootstrap-optimist: 0.0018). We provide a simple clinical score to estimate probability of death, dividing patients in four grades (I-IV) of increasing probability. Hydroxychloroquine (79.2%) and antivirals (67.6%) were the specific drugs most commonly used. After a propensity score adjustment, the results suggested a slight improvement in mortality rates (adjusted-OR_{hydroxychloroquine} 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.91, p = 0.005; adjusted-OR_antiviral 0.94; 95% CI 0.87-1.01; p = 0.115). COVID-19 produces important mortality, mostly in patients with comorbidities with respiratory symptoms. Hydroxychloroquine could be associated with survival benefit, but this data need to be confirmed with further trials. Trial Registration: NCT04334291/EUPAS34399.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated aortic valves: Experience with a new supra-annular device. The Spanish Allegra valve-in-valve (SAVIV) registry

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the results of valve-in-valve procedures performed with the Allegra device.

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation to treat degenerated biological aortic valves (valve-in-valve) is an established procedure in most catheterization laboratories, but the results are poorer than procedures done in native aortic stenosis. The Allegra device (Biosensors, Morges, Switzerland) has an excellent design to treat these patients.

METHODS

All patients with severely degenerated biological aortic valve treated with the Allegra device in centers from Spain until December 2020 were included (n = 29). Hemodynamic results and 30-day clinical outcomes were evaluated. The predominant hemodynamic failure was stenosis in 15, regurgitation in 11, and a combination of both in 3 cases. Time from aortic valve replacement to valve-in-valve procedure was 8.4 ± 3.9 years (range 3.3-22.1).

RESULTS

After the procedure, maximum and mean trans-valvular gradients were 17.4 ± 12.3 and 8.4 ± 6.1 mmHg, respectively. Device success was obtained in 28 patients (96.6%). In one patient with a degenerated 19 mm prosthetic valve, mean gradient after the procedure was 22 mmHg. No patients had a para-valvular leak grade >1. There were no deaths during the hospitalization or at 30 days and one patient suffered a stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

The Allegra trans-catheter aortic valve offers optimal hemodynamic results in patients with severely degenerated biological aortic valve.

Consequences of canceling elective invasive cardiac procedures during Covid-19 outbreak

BACKGROUND

During COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, elective procedures were canceled or postponed, mainly due to health care systems overwhelming.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of interrupting invasive procedures in patients with chronic cardiac diseases due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain.

METHODS

The study population is comprised of 2,158 patients that were pending on elective cardiac invasive procedures in 37 hospitals in Spain on the 14th of March 2020, when a state of alarm and subsequent lockdown was declared in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients were followed-up until April 31th.

RESULTS

Out of the 2,158 patients, 36 (1.7%) died. Mortality was significantly higher in patients pending on structural procedures (4.5% vs. 0.8%, respectively; p < .001), in those >80 year-old (5.1% vs. 0.7%, p < .001), and in presence of diabetes (2.7% vs. 0.9%, p = .001), hypertension (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p = .014), hypercholesterolemia (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = .026) [Correction added on December 23, 2020, after first online publication: as per Dr. Moreno's request changes in p-values were made after original publication in Abstract.], chronic renal failure (6.0% vs. 1.2%, p < .001), NYHA > II (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p = .001), and CCS > II (4.2% vs. 1.4%, p = .013), whereas was it was significantly lower in smokers (0.5% vs. 1.9%, p = .013). Multivariable analysis identified age > 80, diabetes, renal failure and CCS > II as independent predictors for mortality.

CONCLUSION

Mortality at 45 days during COVID-19 outbreak in patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases included in a waiting list due to cancellation of invasive elective procedures was 1.7%. Some clinical characteristics may be of help in patient selection for being promptly treated when similar situations happen in the future.

Early and midterm outcomes after transaxillar versus transfemoral TAVI. data from the spanish TAVI registry

 

Transaxillary access (TAx) has emerged as a less invasive alternative access when transfemoral access (TF) is not possible in patients undergoing TAVI. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare total in-hospital and 30-day mortality of patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry that were treated by TAx versus TF access.

Methods

All patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry who were treated by TAx or TF access were analyzed. In-hospital and 30-days outcomes were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. An analyses by propensity score matching and multilevel logistic regression was performed for comparing both groups.

Results

A total of 6603 patients were included, of whom 191 (2.9%) were treated by TAx and 6412 were treated with TF access. After the adjustment, the device success was similar between both groups (94%, TAx vs 95%, TF p=0.95) as well as the rate of vascular complications (11.9% Tax vs 11.9 TF; p=0.78), bleeding (7.7% TAx vs. 7.9% TF; p=0.62) and stroke (4.2% TAx vs. 2.0 TF; p=0.09). However, in-hospital and 30-day mortality was significantly higher in TAx access group versus TF 2.19 (1.13–4.26): p=0.02 and 2.11 (1.08–4, 13); P=0.02, respectively. Similarly, the rate of acute myocardial infarction 5.05 (1.94–13.1); p=0.001, renal complications 2.07 (1.19–3.60; p =) 0.01 and pacemaker implantation 1.56 (1.01–2.40); p=0.04 was higher in the TAx group versus TF.

Conclusions

Transaxillary access compared to transfemoral access is associated with an increase in total in-hospital and 30-day mortality, as a result TAx access should be considered only in those cases in which TF is not possible

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Late results of bioabsorbable scaffolds implanted in spontaneous coronary artery dissection evaluated with computed tomography coronary angiography

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) should be reserved for cases presenting with ongoing extensive ischaemia. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) have emerged as an alternative to avoid permanent stenting, an especially attractive concept for this clinical scenario. However, data of late angiographic outcome of this device in SCAD is lacking.

Purpose

To evaluate the long-term angiographic outcome of BVS in the setting of SCAD using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA)

Methods

In this multicentre prospective study, high-risk SCAD patients treated with BVS were scheduled for a follow-up CTCA at least 2 years from implantation date. Acquisition was performed according to the current recommendations. All the studies were analysed in a central core laboratory by an independent level 3 expert in CTCA blinded to the clinical and angiographic results. For this purpose, a dedicated software for coronary analysis was used to quantify coronary stenosis and evaluate coronary wall.

Results

Thirty-four BVS were implanted in 15 SCAD patients (51±12 years-old; 87% female) from 7 different centres in Spain and United Kingdom. The most common presentation was STEMI (n=9, 60%). Target vessels included 11 left anterior descending arteries (73.3%), 3 right coronary arteries (20%) and 1 left circumflex coronary artery (6.7%). One patient received target lesion revascularisation due to scaffold shrinkage in a proximal right coronary artery at 13 months. CTCA was performed 2.4±0.7 years after BVS implantation. No scaffold thrombosis or significant stenosis were detected. Patency of all scaffolds was confirmed with a median luminal area of 5.52 mm2 (IQR: 3.74–6.95) and median stenosis of 11% (IQR: 4–15%). Regarding coronary wall tissue characterization of segments with BVS, there was 32±9.3% of plaque burden and a median plaque volume of 45.3 mm3 (IQR: 26.6–61.9). The most common component of the plaque was fibrous (85±9.4%). Compared to the proximal reference segments, BVS showed more plaque burden (32.2% vs 25.3%; p=0.017) and fibrous percentage (84.7% vs 75.1%; p=0.004) whereas less fibrofatty (6 vs 4.8 mm3; p=0.007) and necrotic volume (0.4 vs 1.2 mm3; p=0.029). BVS segments showed lower absolute minimal luminal area (5.5 vs 8.9 mm2; p=0.004) and diameter (2.7 vs 3.4 mm; p=0.004) compared to the reference segment; however, non-significant differences were seen in percentage stenosis, in keeping with normal vessel tapering.

Conclusions

In this series of SCAD treated with BVS, scaffolds showed a satisfactory late angiographic outcome, with no significant restenosis and an excellent minimal luminal area and optimal coronary wall healing observed.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in the elderly: clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes

Background

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes of SCAD in elderly patients remain unknown.

Methods

The Spanish multicenter prospective SCAD registry included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD diagnosis. Patients were classified according to age in two groups: &lt;65 and ≥65 years old.

Results

A total of 55 patients (17%) were 65 or older (Table). Elderly patients had more often hypertension (29% vs 76%, p&lt;0.01) and dyslipidemia (30% vs 56%, p&lt;0.01), and less smoking history (51% vs 7%, p&lt;0.01). Previous history of coronary artery disease was also more frequent in older patients (4% vs 11%, p=0.044). Interestingly, an identifiable trigger was more often found among patients under 65. Coronary artery tortuosity (1±0.99 vs 1.4±1, p=0.027) and coronary artery ectasia (9% vs 24%, p&lt;0.01) were both more frequent in elderly patients, who were more often managed conservatively (75% vs 89%, p=0.025). A trend toward a higher mortality rate was found among patients ≥65, with no differences in terms of in hospital stay, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronariography or heart failure.

Conclusions

Elderly patients with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics and they receive distinct management. Short-term outcomes do not significantly differ from those seen in younger patients.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Impact of COVID-19 on ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care. The Spanish experience

Introduction and objectives

The COVID-19 outbreak has had an unclear impact on the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to assess changes in STEMI management during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Methods

Using a multicenter, nationwide, retrospective, observational registry of consecutive patients who were managed in 75 specific STEMI care centers in Spain, we compared patient and procedural characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in 2 different cohorts with 30-day follow-up according to whether the patients had been treated before or after COVID-19.

Results

Suspected STEMI patients treated in STEMI networks decreased by 27.6% and patients with confirmed STEMI fell from 1305 to 1009 (22.7%). There were no differences in reperfusion strategy (> 94% treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in both cohorts). Patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention during the COVID-19 outbreak had a longer ischemic time (233 [150-375] vs 200 [140-332] minutes, P < .001) but showed no differences in the time from first medical contact to reperfusion. In-hospital mortality was higher during COVID-19 (7.5% vs 5.1%; unadjusted OR, 1.50; 95%CI, 1.07-2.11; P < .001); this association remained after adjustment for confounders (risk-adjusted OR, 1.88; 95%CI, 1.12-3.14; P = .017). In the 2020 cohort, there was a 6.3% incidence of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization.

Conclusions

The number of STEMI patients treated during the current COVID-19 outbreak fell vs the previous year and there was an increase in the median time from symptom onset to reperfusion and a significant 2-fold increase in the rate of in-hospital mortality. No changes in reperfusion strategy were detected, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed for the vast majority of patients. The co-existence of STEMI and SARS-CoV-2 infection was relatively infrequent.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in Spain: clinical and angiographic characteristics, management, and in-hospital events

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an uncommon cause of acute coronary syndrome. The characteristics and in-hospital clinical course of patients with SCAD in Spain remain unknown.

METHODS

We present data from consecutive patients included in the national prospective SCAD registry. Angiographic analysis was performed in a centralized core laboratory.

RESULTS

Between June 2015 and April 2019, we included 318 patients with SCAD (358 lesions) from 31 centers. Median age was 53 years, and 88% were women. The most frequent presentation was non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (53%). The most frequently involved artery was the left anterior descending coronary artery (44%), predominantly affecting the distal segments (39%) and secondary branches (54%). Most lesions (62%) appeared on angiography as intramural hematoma, without double lumen. Conservative management was selected as the initial approach in most patients (78%). During the index admission, 6% of patients had a major adverse event and 4 patients (1.3%) died. Independent predictors of adverse events were initial management with percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 5.97; P=.004) and angiographic presentation as intramural hematoma (OR, 4.96; P=.028).

CONCLUSIONS

In Spain, SCAD affects mainly middle-aged women. In most patients, the initial management strategy was conservative with excellent in-hospital survival. Initial management with percutaneous coronary intervention and angiographic presentation as intramural hematoma were related to the presence of in-hospital adverse events. Registered at ClnicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03607981).

Baseline Risk Stratification of Patients Older Than 75 Years With Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Primary Angioplasty

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients older than 75 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty in cardiogenic shock have high mortality. Identification of preprocedural predictors of short- and long-term mortality could be useful to guide decision-making and further interventions.

METHODS

We analyzed a nationwide registry of primary angioplasty in the elderly (ESTROFA MI+75) comprising 3576 patients. The characteristics and outcomes of the subgroup of patients in cardiogenic shock were analyzed to identify associated factors and prognostic predictors in order to derive a baseline risk prediction score for 1-year mortality. The score was validated in an independent cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 332 patients were included. Baseline independent predictors of mortality were anterior myocardial infarction (HR 2.8, 95%CI, 1.4-6.0 P=.005), ejection fraction<40% (HR 2.3, 95%CI, 1.14-4.50 P=.018), and time from symptom onset to angioplasty >6hours (HR 3.2, 95%CI, 1.6-7.5; P=.001). A score was designed that included these predictive factors (score "6-ANT-40"). Survival at 1 year was 54.5% for patients with score 0, 32.3% for score 1, 27.4% for score 2 and 17% for score 3 (P=.004, c-statistic 0.70). The score was validated in an independent cohort of 124 patients, showing 1-year survival rates of 64.5%, 40.0%, 28.9%, and 22.2%, respectively (P=.008, c-statistic 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

A preprocedural score based on 3 simple clinical variables (anterior location, ejection fraction<40%, and delay time >6 hours) may be used to estimate survival after primary angioplasty in elderly patients with cardiogenic shock and to guide preinterventional decision-making.

Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis: Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is more challenging than that of patients with bare-metal stent ISR. However, the results of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in these distinct scenarios remain unsettled.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A pooled analysis of the RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) and RIBS V (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data to compare the efficacy of EES in bare-metal stent ISR and DES-ISR. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. Results of 94 patients treated with EES for bare-metal stent ISR were compared with those of 155 patients treated with EES for DES-ISR. Baseline characteristics were more adverse in patients with DES-ISR, although they presented later and more frequently with a focal pattern. After intervention, minimal lumen diameter (2.22±0.5 versus 2.38±0.5 mm, P=0.01) was smaller in the DES-ISR group. Late angiographic findings (89.3% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (2.03±0.7 versus 2.36±0.6 mm, P<0.001) and diameter stenosis (23±22 versus 13±17%, P<0.001) were poorer in patients with DES-ISR. Results were consistent in the in-segment and in-lesion analyses. On multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR. Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), mortality (2.6 versus 0%, P<0.01) and need for target vessel revascularization (8 versus 2%, P=0.03) were higher in the DES-ISR group.

CONCLUSIONS

This patient-level pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized clinical trials suggests that EES provide favorable outcomes in patients with ISR. However, the results of EES are less satisfactory in patients with DES-ISR than in those with bare-metal stent ISR.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01239953 and NCT01239940.

Usefulness of Drug-Eluting Balloons for Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Trials)

Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is particularly challenging. We sought to compare results of drug-eluting balloons in patients with DES-ISR with those in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent IV and V randomized trials was performed. Both trials had identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results of drug-eluting balloons in 95 patients with BMS-ISR and 154 patients with DES-ISR were compared. Patients with DES-ISR were more frequently diabetics, presented more often as an acute coronary syndrome and had more severe lesions and more frequently a focal pattern, including edge-ISR. Late angiographic findings (92% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (1.80 ± 0.6 vs 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.001; absolute mean difference 0.21 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.38; p = 0.014) and restenosis rate (19% vs 9.5%, p <0.05) were poorer in DES-ISR. Results were consistent across 10 prespecified subgroups. Moreover, on multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted absolute mean difference 0.17 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.41; p = 0.019). Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), rates of target vessel revascularization (16% vs 6%, p = 0.02) and of the main combined clinical end point (18% vs 8%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients treated for DES-ISR. In conclusion, this study confirms the efficacy of DEB for patients with ISR. However, the long-term clinical and angiographic results of DEB are poorer in patients with DES-ISR than in those with BMS-ISR. (ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT01239953&NCT01239940).

Primary Angioplasty in Patients Older Than 75 Years. Profile of Patients and Procedures, Outcomes, and Predictors of Prognosis in the ESTROFA IM+75 Registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The proportion of elderly patients undergoing primary angioplasty is growing. The present study describes the clinical profile, procedural characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of outcome.

METHODS

A 31-center registry of consecutive patients older than 75 years treated with primary angioplasty. Clinical and procedural data were collected, and the patients underwent clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 3576 patients (39.3% women, 48.5% with renal failure, 11.5% in Killip III or IV, and 29.8% with>6hours of chest pain). Multivessel disease was present in 55.4% and nonculprit lesions were additionally treated in 24.8%. Radial access was used in 56.4%, bivalirudin in 11.8%, thromboaspiration in 55.9%, and drug-eluting stents in 26.6%. The 1-month and 2-year incidences of cardiovascular death were 10.1% and 14.7%, respectively. The 2-year rates of definite or probable thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and BARC bleeding>2 were 3.1%, 2.3%, and 4.2%, respectively. Predictive factors were diabetes mellitus, renal failure, atrial fibrillation, delay to reperfusion>6hours, ejection fraction<45%, Killip class III-IV, radial access, bivalirudin, drug-eluting stents, final TIMI flow of III, and incomplete revascularization at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Notable registry findings include frequently delayed presentation and a high prevalence of adverse factors such as renal failure and multivessel disease. Positive procedure-related predictors include shorter delay, use of radial access, bivalirudin, drug-eluting stents, and complete revascularization before discharge.

Comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in the drug-eluting stent era

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes mellitus and chronic total occlusions are associated with unfavorable outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to assess the clinical and angiographic outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic patients who underwent successful percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, procedural details, nine-month angiographic follow-up and clinical events at 12 months were compared between 75 diabetic and 132 non-diabetic patients included in a clinical trial that randomized successful recanalization of chronic total occlusions to receive sirolimus- or everolimus-eluting stents.

RESULTS

In both diabetic and non-diabetic groups there was a favorable non-significantly different angiographic result at nine months, with low in-stent late loss (0.14±0.60 mm vs. 0.25±0.68 mm, p=0.305) and rates of binary restenosis (4.0% vs. 10.6%, p=0.180) and reocclusion (0.0% vs. 2.3%, p=0.334). During follow-up similar survival from death (97.3±1.9% vs. 99.2±0.8%, log-rank p=0.273), acute myocardial infarction (100.0±0.0% vs. 97.7±1.3%, log-rank p=0.192), target vessel revascularization (88.7±3.8% vs. 88.2±2.9%, log-rank p=0.899) and stent thrombosis (100.0±0.0% vs. 97.7±1.3%, log-rank p=0.192) was observed. Furthermore, the presence of more diffuse peripheral and coronary artery disease and higher frequency of calcified lesions in diabetic patients did not lead to significant differences in the approach (20.0% vs. 25.0% radial approach, p=0.413), strategy (6.7% vs. 3.8% retrograde strategy, p=0.353), total stent length (48.1±24.6 mm vs. 49.2±23.9 mm, p=0758) or contrast volume (261.3±116.4 ml vs. 297.4±135.9 ml, p=0.109) required for revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

In the drug-eluting stent era, diabetic and non-diabetic patients have comparable favorable clinical and angiographic outcomes after successful percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions.

Drug-eluting stent thrombosis in the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: incidence, presentation and related factors. Data from the CIBELES trial

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of drug-eluting stent thrombosis (sirolimus or everolimus) in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions (CTO) and to determine its clinical implications and related factors.

METHODS

Data from the 12-month follow-up of the 207 patients included in the CIBELES trial with CTO were analyzed.

RESULTS

Stent thrombosis occurred in three patients, two definite and one probable (overall thrombosis rate: 1.4%). However, there were no cases of death or Q-wave myocardial infarction. In univariate analysis, patients with a higher incidence of stent thrombosis were those in whom the target vessel was the left anterior descending, who had single-vessel disease, were assigned to treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, and those with smaller minimum luminal diameter immediately after the procedure. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of stent thrombosis was minimal luminal diameter immediately after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of drug-eluting stent thrombosis in patients with CTO is relatively low (1.4%). The only independent predictor of stent thrombosis in this context was minimal luminal diameter after the procedure and the clinical presentation was in all cases relatively benign.

The TITAN-AMI multicenter registry evaluating the usage of Titan2 stent in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Final result at 12-month follow-up

AIM

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation is the recommended treatment for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Data from randomised trials showed good performance by a titanium-nitric-oxide coated stent in this context. The aim of this study was to confirm these data.

METHODS

A multicentre registry was compiled in 23 hospitals in Spain in an all-comers population. We selected patients with STEMI from a global Titan AMI registry that included patients with acute coronary syndrome. Primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularisation, at 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 893 patients with STEMI. We included all possibilities for PCI: 86.6% primary, 5% facilitated after successful fibrinolysis and 8.4% rescue PCI after failed fibrinolysis. The primary endpoint was reached in 8.4% of the patients: cardiac death 2.7%, reinfarction 3.4%, target lesion revascularisation 3.5% and definite or probable stent thrombosis 2.8%. The majority of stent thromboses presented in the first 30 days after PCI.

CONCLUSION

A bioactive stent (titanium-nitric-oxide coated stent) is a possible alternative for the treatment of patients with STEMI. One-year follow-up showed better results than those presented by a regular bare-metal stent or first-generation drug-eluting stent in terms of stent thrombosis.

The plasma proteomic signature as a strategic tool for early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Acute coronary syndrome is the major cause of death in developed countries. Despite its high prevalence, there is still a strong need for new biomarkers which permit faster and more accurate diagnostics and new therapeutic drugs. The basis for this challenge lay in improving our understanding of the whole atherosclerotic process from atherogenesis to atherothrombosis. In this study, we conducted two different proteomic analyses of peripheral blood plasma from non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome and ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients vs healthy controls.

RESULTS

Two-dimensional Fluorescence Difference in Gel Electrophoresis and mass spectrometry permitted the identification of 31 proteins with statistical differences (p < 0.05) between experimental groups. Additionally, validation by Western blot and Selected Reaction Monitoring permitted us to confirm the identification of a different and characteristic plasma proteomic signature for NSTEACS and STEACS patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We purpose the severity of hypoxia as the cornerstone for explaining the differences observed between both groups.

Identification of a circulating microvesicle protein network involved in ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Membrane microvesicles (MVs) are released from activated cells, most notably platelets, into the circulation. They represent an important mode of intercellular communication, and their number is increased in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We present here a differential proteomic analysis of plasma MVs from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) controls. The objective was the identification of MVs biomarkers/drug targets that could be relevant for the pathogenesis of the acute event. Proteome analysis was based on 2D-DIGE, and mass spectrometry. Validations were by western blotting in an independent cohort of patients and healthy individuals. A systems biology approach was used to predict protein-protein interactions and their relation with disease. Following gel image analysis, we detected 117 protein features that varied between STEMI and SCAD groups (fold change cut-off ≥2; p<0.01). From those, 102 were successfully identified, corresponding to 25 open-reading frames (ORFs). Most of the proteins identified are involved in inflammatory response and cardiovascular disease, with 11 ORFs related to infarction. Among others, we report an up-regulation of α2-macroglobulin isoforms, fibrinogen, and viperin in MVs from STEMI patients. Interestingly, several of the proteins identified are involved in thrombogenesis (e.g. α2-macroglobulin, and fibrinogen). In conclusion, we provide a unique panel of proteins that vary between plasma MVs from STEMI and SCAD patients and that might constitute a promising source of biomarkers/drug targets for myocardial infarction.

A randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stent in patients with bare-metal stent-in-stent restenosis: the RIBS V Clinical Trial (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: paclitaxel-eluting balloon vs. everolimus-eluting stent)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) with that of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR).

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing DEB with EES in patients with bare-metal stents (BMS) in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the minimal lumen diameter at 9 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients with BMS-ISR from 25 Spanish sites were included (95 were allocated to DEB and 94 to EES). Procedural success was achieved in all patients. At late angiography (median 249 days; 92% of eligible patients), patients in the EES arm had a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter (2.36 ± 0.6 mm vs. 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.001; absolute mean difference: 0.35 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16 to 0.53) and a lower percent of diameter stenosis (13 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 20%, p < 0.001). However, late loss (0.04 ± 0.5 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.5 mm, p = 0.14) and binary restenosis rate (4.7% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.22) were very low and similar in both groups. Clinical follow-up (median 365 days) was obtained in all (100%) patients. Occurrences of the combined clinical outcome measure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization; 6% vs. 8%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.26 to 2.18, p = 0.6) and the need for target vessel revascularization (2% vs. 6%; HR: 0.32: 95% CI: 0.07 to 1.59, p = 0.17) were similar in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BMS-ISR, both DEB and EES provided excellent clinical results with a very low rate of clinical and angiographic recurrences. However, compared with DEB, EES provide superior late angiographic findings. (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs. Everolimus-eluting Stent [RIBS V]; NCT01239953).

Plasma metabolomics reveals a potential panel of biomarkers for early diagnosis in acute coronary syndrome

Discovery of new biomarkers is critical for early diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent advances in metabolomic technologies have drastically enhanced the possibility of improving the knowledge of its physiopathology through the identification of the altered metabolic pathways. In this study, analyses of peripheral plasma from non-ST segment elevation ACS patients and healthy controls by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MC) permitted the identification of 15 metabolites with statistical differences (p < 0.05) between experimental groups. Additionally, validation by GC-MC and liquid chromatography-MC permitted us to identify a potential panel of biomarkers formed by 5-OH-tryptophan, 2-OH-butyric acid and 3-OH-butyric acid. This panel of biomarkers reflects the oxidative stress and the hypoxic state that suffers the myocardial cells and consequently constitutes a metabolomic signature of the atherogenesis process that could be used for early diagnosis of ACS.

Long-term clinical performance of paclitaxel-eluting stents coated with a bioactive polymer (P-5) containing a triflusal derivative: results of the REWAC registry

AIMS

Although drug-eluting stents have dramatically reduced angiographic restenosis and clinical need for repeat revascularization procedures, some adverse effects, such as late stent thrombosis, have been described. We evaluated clinical performance of paclitaxel-eluting stents coated with a new bioactive polymer system (P-5) based on a copolymer of an acrylic derivative of triflusal in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a multicenter, observational, prospective study to assess the incidence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months and clinical major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 1 and 6 months and 1 and 2 years post-stent implantation in 537 patients. After stent implantation, only 1 case of thrombus and acute occlusion was reported in 1 lesion (0.14%). The incidence of new TLR was 0.89% at 6 months, 1.08% at 1 year, and 1.49% at 2 years, with a cumulative incidence of 3.54%. MACEs included cardiac death (0.93%), myocardial infarction (0.37%), and cardiac surgery (0.19%). No cases of late or very late stent thrombosis were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Under routine clinical practice, the implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents coated with P-5 is associated with favorable clinical outcomes in both the short and long term (2 years) in patients with coronary artery disease.

Techniques and material used in the percutaneous treatment of chronic coronary occlusions. Data from the CIBELES study

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, various specific techniques and materials have been developed for the treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current situation in the treatment of CTO (techniques and material) in our setting.

METHODS

We evaluated data on techniques and material used in the CIBELES (ChronIc coronary occlusion treated By EveroLimus Eluting Stent) trial, a randomized comparison of sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents in 207 patients with CTO in 13 centers in Spain and Portugal.

RESULTS

A radial approach was used in 23% of patients, and retrograde techniques were used in only 5%. A high number of balloons were used (2.2±0.9 per patient). Microcatheters were used in 33% of patients, and post-dilatation balloons in only 25%. The mean number of stents implanted per patient was 2.1±1.0, with a mean total stent length of 49±24 mm. Other devices and techniques used were: Tornus penetration catheter in 4% of patients, rotational atherectomy in 2%, and cutting balloon in 1%. Intracoronary ultrasound was used in only 6% of patients. In 34% of cases, operators used guidewires that were not specifically for CTO. Considerable variability between centers was detected in the use of different techniques, the highest and lowest variability being observed in the use of intracoronary ultrasound and the use of CTO guidewires, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CIBELES trial, techniques and devices specifically designed for the treatment of CTO were used in a relatively low proportion of patients. Considerable variability between centers was detected.

Randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents in the treatment of total coronary occlusions: results from the chronic coronary occlusion treated by everolimus-eluting stent randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronary total occlusions are at especially high risk for restenosis and new revascularizations. Sirolimus-eluting stents dramatically improved the clinical outcome of this subset of patients in randomized trials, but other drug-eluting stents, mainly the everolimus-eluting stent (currently the most frequently used stent), have not yet been evaluated in patients with coronary total occlusions. The objective was to compare the second-generation everolimus-eluting stent with the first-generation sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary total occlusions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 207 patients with coronary total occlusions and estimated time since occlusion >2 weeks were randomized to everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting stent. The primary end point was in-stent late loss at 9-month angiographic follow-up (noninferiority trial). Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months. In-stent late loss at 9 months was 0.29±0.60 versus 0.13±0.69 mm in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively. The observed difference in in-stent late loss between both groups was -0.16 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.04 to -0.36 mm; P for noninferiority <0.01). The rate of binary angiographic restenosis was 10.8% and 9.1% in patients allocated to sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.709), whereas the rate of vessel reocclusion was 3.2% and 1.1%, respectively (P=0.339). At 12 months, the rate of major adverse events was 15.9% versus 11.1% with sirolimus- and everolimus-eluting stent, respectively (P=0.335), and probable or definitive stent thrombosis occurred in 3.0% and 0.0% of patients, respectively (P=0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with coronary total occlusions, everolimus-eluting stent is as effective as sirolimus-eluting stent.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00793221.

A randomised comparison between everolimus-eluting stent and sirolimus-eluting stent in chronic coronary total occlusions. Rationale and design of the CIBELES (non-acute Coronary occlusion treated by EveroLimus-Eluting Stent) trial

Chronic total coronary occlusions constitute a sub-group of lesions at very high risk of restenosis after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. The sirolimus-eluting coronary stent is the only drugeluting stent that has demonstrated to reduce angiographic restenosis and the need for new revascularisation procedures in comparison with bare-metal stents in randomised clinical trials focusing on these lesions. Everolimus-eluting stents have shown to offer optimal angiographic and clinical outcomes in comparison with bare-metal stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents, but no randomised trials have tested the device in chronic total occlusions. The CIBELES (non-acute Coronary occlusIon treated By EveroLimus- Eluting Stent) will randomise 208 patients with chronic total coronary occlusions in 13 centres from Portugal and Spain to receive everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting coronary stents. The primary endpoint will be angiographic in-stent late loss.

Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the GRACIA-2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial

AIMS

In patients with acute myocardial infarction and ST-segment elevation (STEMI), primary angioplasty is frequently not available or performed beyond the recommended time limit. We designed a non-inferiority, randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether lytic-based early routine angioplasty represents a reasonable reperfusion option for victims of STEMI irrespective of geographic or logistical barriers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 212 STEMI patients were randomized to full tenecteplase followed by stenting within 3-12 h of randomization (early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty; 104 patients), or to undergo primary stenting with abciximab within 3 h of randomization (primary angioplasty; 108 patients). The primary endpoints were epicardial and myocardial reperfusion, and the extent of left ventricular myocardial damage, determined by means of the infarct size and 6-week left ventricular function. The secondary endpoints were the acute incidence of bleeding and the 6-month composite incidence of death, reinfarction, stroke, or revascularization. Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty resulted in higher frequency (21 vs. 6%, P = 0.003) of complete epicardial and myocardial reperfusion (TIMI 3 epicardial flow and TIMI 3 myocardial perfusion and resolution of the initial sum of ST-segment elevation > or = 70%) following angioplasty. Both groups were similar regarding infarct size (area under the curve of CK-MB: 4613 +/- 3373 vs. 4649 +/- 3632 microg/L/h, P = 0.94); 6-week left ventricular function (ejection fraction: 59.0 +/- 11.6 vs. 56.2 +/- 13.2%, P = 0.11; endsystolic volume index: 27.2 +/- 12.8 vs. 29.7 +/- 13.6, P = 0.21); major bleeding (1.9 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.99) and 6-month cumulative incidence of the clinical endpoint (10 vs. 12%, P = 0.57; relative risk: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-1.74).

CONCLUSION

Early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty safely results in better myocardial perfusion than primary angioplasty. Despite its later application, this approach seems to be equivalent to primary angioplasty in limiting infarct size and preserving left ventricular function.