Prognostic Value of the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Patients Undergoing the MitraClip Procedure

Therapie der sekundären Mitralklappeninsuffizienz – Strategien eines interuniversitären Verbundes

Die sekundäre Mitralinsuffizienz ist bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz häufig und mit einem schlechten Verlauf assoziiert. Aufgrund des hohen OP-Risikos war die Therapie traditionell auf eine Behandlung der Herzinsuffizienz beschränkt. Die Entwicklung von kathetergestützten Techniken ermöglicht nun die Behandlung mit geringem Risiko. Wenngleich die Studienevidenz immer noch begrenzt ist, erfolgte in den aktuellen Leitlinien der europäischen Fachgesellschaften eine Aufwertung der kathetergestützten Therapie für ausgewählte Patienten mit hohem OP-Risiko und hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit für ein Therapieansprechen. Dennoch bleiben viele Fragen offen, was die Rolle der chirurgischen Behandlung und auch die Patientenselektion für kathetergestützte Therapieverfahren angeht. Hier beschreiben wir den aktuellen Stand der Behandlung der sekundären Mitralinsuffizienz und zeigen Strategien von transuniversitären Verbundprojekten mit dem Ziel, Evidenz für die Behandlung dieser Patienten zu entwickeln.

A staging classification of right heart remodelling for patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND

In patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who are scheduled for transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR), risk stratification is predominantly based on surgical risk scores.

AIMS

We sought to characterise and define stages of right heart remodelling in patients undergoing TMVR and evaluate the impact of this staging classification on survival.

METHODS

According to echocardiographic parameters, 929 patients undergoing MitraClip treatment were classified into three stages: severe MR without right heart damage (stage 0), with moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (stage 1), with right ventricular dysfunction defined as a reduced fractional area change <35% and a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm, or with increased right atrial area >25 cm² and/or indexed right ventricular volume >30 ml/m² (stage 2). We compared clinical outcomes and performed a multivariate analysis to evaluate the predictive value of the extent of cardiac damage.

RESULTS

Rates of one-year all-cause mortality increased with more advanced stages of right heart remodelling (stage 0: 8% vs stage 1: 9.7% vs stage 2: 18.1%; p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, advanced cardiac damage was an independent predictor of one-year all-cause mortality (stage 2: p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A simple staging classification objectively characterises the extent of right heart remodelling caused by MR and allows risk prediction in patients undergoing a MitraClip procedure.

Machine Learning Identifies Clinical Parameters to Predict Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML)-based risk stratification tool for 1-year mortality in transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) patients incorporating metabolic and hemodynamic parameters.

BACKGROUND

The lack of appropriate, well-validated, and specific means to risk-stratify patients with mitral regurgitation complicates the evaluation of prognostic benefits of TMVR in clinical trials and practice.

METHODS

A total of 1,009 TMVR patients from 3 university hospitals within the Heart Failure Network Rhineland were included; 1 hospital (n = 317) served as external validation. The primary endpoint was all-cause 1-year mortality. Model performance was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. In the derivation cohort, different ML algorithms were tested using 5-fold cross-validation. The final model, called MITRALITY (transcatheter mitral valve repair mortality prediction system) was tested in the validation cohort with respect to existing clinical scores.

RESULTS

Extreme gradient boosting was selected for the MITRALITY score, using only 6 baseline clinical features for prediction (in order of predictive importance): urea, hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, mean arterial pressure, body mass index, and creatinine. In the external validation cohort, the MITRALITY score's area under the curve was 0.783 (95% CI: 0.716-0.849), while existing scores yielded areas under the curve of 0.721 (95% CI: 0.63-0.811) and 0.657 (95% CI: 0.536-0.778) at best.

CONCLUSIONS

The MITRALITY score is a novel, internally and externally validated ML-based tool for risk stratification of patients prior to TMVR, potentially serving future clinical trials and daily clinical practice.

Periprocedural changes in natriuretic peptide levels and clinical outcome after transcatheter mitral valve repair

Aims

This multicentre study investigated the association of periprocedural changes in the levels of N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) with clinical outcomes after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair (TMVR).

Methods and results

Patients were retrospectively analysed who underwent TMVR with the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and had available sequential NT‐proBNP testing at baseline and 2 months after TMVR. Periprocedural changes in NT‐proBNP following TMVR were assessed as the percent change in NT‐proBNP between baseline and the 2 month follow‐up, and the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was defined as a decrease of >30% in the follow‐up NT‐proBNP compared with the pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP level. Primary outcome was defined as a composite outcome consisting of all‐cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure from 2 months to 2 years after TMVR. Additionally, we identified the cut‐off value of pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP to predict the composite outcome using a receiver operating characteristic analysis (cut‐off: 2485 pg/mL). Of 485 patients undergoing TMVR (age: 76.2 ± 9.2 years, female: 42.1%, secondary mitral regurgitation: 67.2%), 150 patients (30.9%) had the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP (>30%) following the procedure. Patients with the NT‐proBNP reduction had a lower incidence of the composite outcome, compared with those without the reduction in NT‐proBNP (31.4% vs. 40.2%; log‐rank P = 0.03). The significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was also associated with a lower risk of the composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.97; P = 0.04], independently of pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP levels and other clinical parameters. The percent change in NT‐proBNP was associated with a linear trend of the incidence of the composite outcome (adjusted HR per 10% decrease: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.94–0.98; P < 0.001). A stratified analysis revealed that the prognostic impact of the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP was consistent among clinical subgroups, including aetiology of mitral regurgitation (P for interaction = 0.99). Higher pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP level (>2485 pg/mL) was associated with the increased risk of the composite outcome (adjusted HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.03–2.17; P = 0.03); however, patients with a higher pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP who achieved the significant reduction in NT‐proBNP had a similar risk of the composite outcome to those with a lower pre‐procedural NT‐proBNP.

Conclusions

Changes in sequential NT‐proBNP measurements were associated with clinical outcomes within 2 years after TMVR. The assessment of NT‐proBNP dynamics may be valuable to assess the residual risk for patients undergoing TMVR and could assist with post‐procedural management after TMVR.

Prognostic value of hepatorenal function following transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND

Hepatorenal dysfunction is a strong prognostic predictor in patients with heart failure. However, the prognostic impact of the hepatorenal dysfunction in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) has not been well studied.

METHODS

In consecutive patients who underwent edge-to-edge TMVR at three German centers, the model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score was calculated as 5.11 × ln [serum total bilirubin (mg/dl)] + 11.76 × ln [serum creatinine (mg/dl)] + 9.44. Patients were stratified into high (> 11) or low (≤ 11) MELD-XI score of which an incidence of the composite outcome, consisting of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, within 2 years after TMVR was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 881 patients, the mean MELD-XI score was 11.0 ± 5.9, and 415 patients (47.1%) had high MELD-XI score. The MELD-XI score was correlated with male, effective regurgitant orifice area, and tricuspid regurgitation severity and inversely related to left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with high MELD-XI score had a higher incidence of the composite outcome than those with low MELD-XI score (47.7% vs. 29.8%; p < 0.0001), and in multivariable analysis, the high MELD-XI score was an independent predictor of the composite outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.77; p = 0.04). Additionally, the MELD-XI score as a continuous variable was also an independent predictor (adjusted HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

The MELD-XI score was associated with clinical outcomes within 2 years after TMVR and can be a useful risk-stratification tool in patients undergoing TMVR.

Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) Score Predicts Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair

Background Optimizing risk stratification in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair is an ongoing challenge. The Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) score represents a user-friendly mortality risk stratification tool that is validated on a large-scale registry of patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). We here assessed the potential benefit of the MIDA risk score for patients with functional or degenerative MR undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair. Methods and Results In total, 680 patients undergoing MitraClip implantation were stratified according to MIDA score tertiles into a low (0-7), intermediate (8-9), and a high (10-12) MIDA score group. MR was assessed in follow-up echocardiograms in 416 patients at 323±169 days after transcatheter mitral valve repair. During 2-year follow-up, 8.2% (15/182) of patients with low, 21.3% (64/300) with intermediate, and 26.3% (52/198) with high MIDA score died (log-rank test P<0.001). Hazard of all-cause mortality increased by 13% (95% CI, 3%-25%) with every additional point of the MIDA score. Subanalysis of 431 patients with functional MR showed similar results. Furthermore, rates of a combined end point of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure were higher with increasing MIDA score (30% [54/182], 38% [113/300] and 48% [94/198], respectively, log-rank test P=0.001). Frequency of residual MR ≥II at follow-up increased with increasing MIDA score group (33%, 44%, and 59%, respectively, P<0.001). Conclusions The MIDA mortality risk score maintains its predictive utility in patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair, regardless of MR cause. Moreover, it was predictive of worse event-free survival regarding a combined end point of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure, and was associated with postprocedural residual MR ≥II and MR recurrence.