Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in living liver donors: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial

Current Practices and Recent Advances in Perioperative Pain Management for Liver Transplantation Living Donors and Recipients

Analgesia in liver transplantation patients has been traditionally considered a secondary priority where perioperative management principally focused on survival rates in these critically ill patients. With recent advancements in both surgical and medical management, posttransplant survival rates have steadily improved. Outcome measurements are no longer limited to short-term mortality rates and hospital length of stay but are also measured by patient-centered outcomes, such as pain control and quality of life. As living donor liver transplantation has increased access to transplantation, it has also added a different patient population to manage in the perioperative period. For healthy patients undergoing living donor hepatectomies, it is important to reduce the impact of the surgery with proper perioperative pain management. We performed a literature search for articles related to perioperative pain management for liver transplantation living donors and recipients to identify current practices and recent advances. Neuraxial techniques, peripheral nerve blocks, and enteral and parenteral medications were all found to be feasible analgesia modalities for patients undergoing either liver transplant or donor hepatectomy. Patients may also benefit from nonpharmacological interventions and preoperative counseling. No particular perioperative analgesic modality was deemed superior to any other. For liver transplant living donors and recipients, perioperative pain management should emphasize the application of sustainable patient-centered pain control protocols.

The Role of the Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Facilitating Operating Room Extubation After Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

Background: Effective pain management is essential to early extubation and recovery in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has emerged as a potential strategy to address postoperative pain while reducing opioid consumption. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the TAP block in facilitating early extubation in the OR and examined its impact on re-intubation rates, postoperative fentanyl requirements, and pain intensity upon ICU admission to determine its role in perioperative pain management. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent LDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes between patients who received the subcostal TAP block and those who did not. The primary outcome was the rate of successful extubation in the operating room (OR). Secondary outcomes included re-intubation rates, postoperative fentanyl requirements, and peak numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores upon ICU admission. Results: The subcostal TAP block was associated with a significantly higher rate of successful OR extubation compared with no TAP block. Multivariable analysis revealed that the TAP block independently increased the likelihood of successful extubation. Patients receiving the TAP block required less fentanyl for pain management and demonstrated lower peak NRS pain scores upon ICU admission. No complications related to the TAP block were observed, underscoring its safety in this high-risk population. Conclusions: The subcostal TAP block facilitates early OR extubation by effectively managing postoperative pain and reducing opioid requirements, promoting smoother recovery without increasing adverse events. These findings support its inclusion in multimodal analgesia protocols for optimizing perioperative outcomes in LDLT patients.

Clinical Trial Study Protocol: A Prospective Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial Protocol to Assess the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery Quality in Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy

Introduction

Liver transplantation is considered an effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) has become a new standard procedure. And it is important to minimize the pain of the donor. Good postoperative analgesia can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and promote the early recovery of the donor. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide effective analgesia for liver donors and reduce postoperative opioid consumption. This study aims to use ultrasound-guided TAP block for LDH to improve postoperative analgesia for donors while reducing opioid consumption and improving patient rehabilitation quality.

Methods/Analysis

This study is a prospective blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a concealed allocation of patients (living liver donors) scheduled to receive laparoscopic partial hepatectomy 1:1 to receive local infiltration anesthesia or TAP block. This study will recruit a total of 80 patients. The primary outcome is the dosage of opioids within 24 hours after surgery.

Ethics and Dissemination

This trial has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beijing Friendship Hospital of China Capital University. This trial study protocol was approved on 8 May 2023. The trial will start recruiting patients after being registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Trial Registration Number

ChiCTR2300071694.

Ultrasound-Guided Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block Is Effective in Reducing Postoperative Opioid Use Following Bimaxillary Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block has recently been described, though its impact upon bimaxillary osteotomy has not been formally investigated.

PURPOSE

The present study was carried out to determine whether the addition of ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block in subjects undergoing bimaxillary osteotomy reduces opioid use.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

A randomized clinical trial was carried out in adults undergoing bimaxillary osteotomy between April 2019 and January 2020 at Teknon Medical Center (Barcelona, Spain).

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The predictor variable was the treatment technique used (maxillary nerve block or no block). The subjects were randomized to either receive (test group) or not receive (control group) bilateral ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (5 ml of 0.37% ropivacaine) before surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

The primary outcome variable was the intravenous methadone requirements in the first two postoperative hours. The secondary outcome variables were postoperative pain, rescue subcutaneous methadone, intravenous remifentanil used intraoperatively, the incidence of postoperative nausea-vomiting, and complications derived from maxillary nerve block.

COVARIATES

Subject age, sex, weight, height, and anesthetic risk, and the duration of surgery were recorded.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed using the χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test. Statistical significance was considered for P < .05.

RESULTS

The baseline sample consisted of 68 subjects scheduled for bimaxillary osteotomy. The follow-up sample comprised 60 subjects: 30 in the control group (10 females and 20 males, aged 34.0 ± 10.2 years) and 30 in the test group (13 females and 17 males, aged 29.8 ± 10.8 years). The subjects who received maxillary nerve block showed less intravenous methadone use in the first 2 hours postsurgery (median 2.0 mg control group vs 0 mg test group; P < .001), lower pain levels at any time during the first 18 hours postsurgery (median visual analog score 4 control group vs 2 test group; P < .001), and a lesser percentage required methadone (33.3% control group vs 0% test group; P < .01) at 4-18 hours postsurgery.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

The results obtained suggest that ultrasound-guided maxillary nerve block is a promising anesthetic technique capable of reducing intraoperative and postoperative opioid use, with greater patient comfort in bimaxillary osteotomy.

Regional anesthesia for transplantation surgery - A White Paper Part 2: Abdominal transplantation surgery

Transplantation surgery continues to evolve and improve through advancements in transplant technique and technology. With the increased availability of ultrasound machines as well as the continued development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, regional anesthesia has become an essential component of providing analgesia and minimizing opioid use perioperatively. Many centers currently utilize peripheral and neuraxial blocks during transplantation surgery, but these techniques are far from standardized practices. The utilization of these procedures is often dependent on transplantation centers' historical methods and perioperative cultures. To date, no formal guidelines or recommendations exist which address the use of regional anesthesia in transplantation surgery. In response, the Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia (SATA) identified experts in both transplantation surgery and regional anesthesia to review available literature concerning these topics. The goal of this task force was to provide an overview of these publications to help guide transplantation anesthesiologists in utilizing regional anesthesia. The literature search encompassed most transplantation surgeries currently performed and the multitude of associated regional anesthetic techniques. Outcomes analyzed included analgesic effectiveness of the blocks, reduction in other analgesic modalities-particularly opioid use, improvement in patient hemodynamics, as well as associated complications. The findings summarized in this systemic review support the use of regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control after transplantation surgeries. Part 1 of the manuscript focused on regional anesthesia performed in thoracic transplantation surgeries, and part 2 in abdominal transplantations. Specifically, regional anesthesia in liver, kidney, pancreas, intestinal, and uterus transplants or applicable surgeries are discussed.

Living liver donor pain management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal pain control in living liver donors undergoing hepatectomy is strongly recommended considering their unique status as healthy individuals willingly undergoing surgery for the benefit of the recipient. This review aims to examine and evaluate different strategies aimed at ensuring effective postoperative pain management in living liver donors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven effective in optimizing patient outcomes, including in living liver donor hepatectomy. By implementing these protocols, healthcare professionals can enhance postoperative pain control and accelerate recovery. Multimodal analgesia, which combines different techniques and agents, is crucial in pain management for living liver donors. Regional analgesia techniques, such as spinal anesthesia and various peripheral nerve blocks, have shown efficacy in reducing pain and facilitating early recovery. Systemic nonopioid analgesics, including acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ketamine, lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine act synergistically to alleviate pain and reduce inflammation. Minimizing the use of opioids is important to avoid adverse effects, and they should be reserved for rescue medication or breakthrough pain.

SUMMARY

Applying the principles of ERAS and multimodal analgesia to living liver donors can effectively control pain while promoting early recovery.

Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block at the Lateral Supra-Arcuate Ligament versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Open Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

Many studies confirmed that several approaches of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) were superior to transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in reducing opioid consumption during postoperative period. As a new QLB approach at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament (QLB-LSAL), the analgesic efficacy and safety in patients undergoing open hepatectomy are still unknown. This study aims to compare postoperative analgesia between the blocks in open hepatectomy.

Patients and Methods

Sixty-two patients undergoing open hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly allocated into the QLB-LSAL group (group Q) and the subcostal TAPB group (group T). Preoperatively, patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral QLB-LSAL or subcostal TAPB with injection of 0.5% ropivacaine (a total volume of 40 mL). The primary outcome was cumulative total morphine equivalent consumption in the first postoperative 24 h. Other outcomes included numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at rest and coughing, cumulative total morphine equivalent consumption at 2, 6, 12, 48 h, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, time to first patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) request, time to first ambulation and adverse effects.

Results

The cumulative total morphine equivalent consumption in group Q was decreased significantly at all postoperative time points (P < 0.01). The postoperative NRS scores at rest and coughing in group Q were lower than those in group T at all postoperative time points except 48 h (P < 0.05). A significant increase was also observed in the QoR-15 scores among patients in group Q. Time to first PCIA request was significantly prolonged in group Q than in group T, and time to first ambulation was shortened. Adverse effects showed no statistical significance between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared with subcostal TAPB, preoperative bilateral QLB-LSAL provided superior analgesic properties and promoted early postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing open hepatectomy.

Trial Registration

China Clinical Trials Registration Center (http://www.chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR2200063291, 3/9/2022.

Transversus abdominis plane block in adult open liver surgery patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM OF THE STUDY

The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) in pain control and recovery after open hepatic surgery.

METHODS

We searched for the articles in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library published before March 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAPB with a placebo in adult patients after open liver surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted in RevMan 5.4. Methodological quality was assessed via the Jadad/Oxford scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 347 patients were included. All studies had an acceptable Jadad score or higher. For pain at rest at 24hours postoperatively, the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was -1.08 [-1.97, -0.18], P-value 0.02, favoring TAPB. Models for total opioid consumption, nausea and vomiting, and duration of hospital stay did not demonstrate a difference between the groups. The model for time to first flatus favored TAPB with SMD with a 95% CI of -1.48 [-2.72, -0.24], P-value 0.02.

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis of five RCTs favored TAPB regarding pain control at rest and time to first flatus. Due to the small sample size and considerable heterogeneity, more RCTs are needed.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022320565.

Erector spinae plane block versus subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open liver resection surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in relation to subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing open liver resection surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, we included adult patients undergoing open liver resection surgery. After induction of general anaesthesia, the included patients were randomized to receive either ESPB (n = 30) or subcostal TAPB (n = 30). Postoperative pain was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) at rest and during cough. Intravenous morphine boluses were used for management of breakthrough pain intra- and postoperatively. The study's primary outcome was morphine consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative morphine consumption, time to first postoperative morphine requirement, incidence of complications, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included and were available for the final analysis in this study. The intra-and postoperative morphine consumption were less in the ESPB group than the subcostal TAPB group (median [quartiles] morphine dose: 0 [0-0] vs 2 [0-5] mg, p = 0.007 and 20 [15-20] vs 25 [20-30] mg, p = 0.006, respectively). The time to first morphine requirement was longer in the ESPB group (median [quartiles]: 6.5 [5.5-6.5] h) than the subcostal TAPB group (median [quartiles]: 4.3 [1.0-6.5] h), P = 0.013. Patients in the ESPB group had lower incidence of sedation and higher level of satisfaction than the subcostal TAPB group.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing open liver resection surgery, ESPB provided superior analgesic properties than subcostal TAPB.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05253079, Principal investigator: Maha Mostafa, Date of registration: February 23, 2022. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05253079.

Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in liver transplant recipients: a before-and-after study

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain management after orthotopic liver transplantation is complex due to impaired liver function and frequent acute kidney dysfunction. Subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block may be of interest in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of subcostal TAP block on opioid consumption after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a before-and-after single center study. During the first period, we included patients whom did not receive an analgesic TAP block. During the second period, we included those with bilateral ultrasound-guided subcostal TAP block (20 mL ropivacaïne 0.2% each side). Patients requiring sedation within 48 hours of surgery as well as patients with combined liver and kidney transplants or skin-only closures were excluded. The primary outcome was cumulative oral morphine consumption within 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and TAP block-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included in the non-TAP block group and 78 patients in the TAP block group. The median oral morphine equivalent consumption (IQR) within 48 hours following surgery was 74 mg (39; 112) for the non-TAP block group and 50 mg (20; 80) for the TAP block group (p<0.001). There was no difference in pain scores between the two groups. No complications related to the TAP block were reported.

CONCLUSION

Subcostal TAP block appears to have a small opioid reducing effect after orthotopic liver transplantation surgery.

Regional abdominal wall nerve block versus epidural anesthesia after hepatectomy: analysis of the ACS NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine whether regional abdominal wall nerve block is a superior to epidural anesthesia (EA) after hepatectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing open hepatectomy in the NSQIP targeted file (2014-2016) were identified. Those with INR > 1.5, Platelets < 100, bleeding disorders, undergoing liver ablation without resection, and spinal anesthesia were excluded. Patients with regional abdominal wall nerve block (RAB), mostly transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, were matched (1:1) to those undergoing EA using propensity scores to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Out of 1727 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 361 (21%) had RAB. Of whom 345 were matched (1:1) to those who underwent EA. The matched cohort was well-balanced regarding preoperative characteristics, extent of hepatectomy, concurrent ablations as well as biliary reconstruction. RAB was associated with shorter hospital stay (median: 6 days vs. 5 days, p = 0.007). Overall morbidity (44.1% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.217), serious morbidity (27% vs. 25.2%, p = 0.603), and mortality (2.6% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.806) were not different between the two groups. Individual complications, readmission rate, and blood transfusion were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Regional abdominal nerve block is associated with shorter hospital stay than epidural anesthesia without an increase in overall postoperative morbidity or mortality. RAB is a viable alternative anesthesia adjunct to EA in patients undergoing hepatectomy. However, given the retrospective nature of this study further studies comparing the modalities should be considered to definitively define the utility of RAB.

Postoperative Analgesia after Open Liver Surgery: Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence

BACKGROUND

The existing recommendations for after open liver surgery, published in 2019, contains limited evidence on the use of regional analgesia techniques. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize available clinical evidence, published after September 2013, on systemic or blended postoperative analgesia for the prevention or treatment of postoperative pain after open liver surgery.

METHODS

The PUBMED and EMBASE registries were used for the literature search to identify suitable studies. Keywords for the literature search were selected, with the authors' agreement, using the PICOS approach: participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design.

RESULTS

The literature search led to the retrieval of a total of 800 studies. A total of 36 studies including 25 RCTs, 5 prospective observational, and 7 retrospective observational studies were selected as suitable for this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence suggests that, in these patients, optimal postoperative pain management should rely on using a "blended approach" which includes the use of systemic opioids and the infusion of NSAIDs along with regional techniques. This approach warrants the highest efficacy in terms of pain prevention, including the lower incretion of postoperative "stress hormones", and fewer side effects. Furthermore, concerns about the potential for the increased risk of wound infection related to the use of regional techniques have been ruled out.

European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia

Nowadays, ultrasound-guidance is commonly used in regional anaesthesia (USGRA) and to locate the spinal anatomy in neuraxial analgesia. The aim of this second guideline on the PERi-operative uSE of UltraSound (PERSEUS-RA) is to provide evidence as to which areas of regional anaesthesia the use of ultrasound guidance should be considered a gold standard or beneficial to the patient. The PERSEUS Taskforce members were asked to define relevant outcomes and rank the relative importance of outcomes following the GRADE process. Whenever the literature was not able to provide enough evidence, we decided to use the RAND method with a modified Delphi process. Whenever compared with alternative techniques, the use of USGRA is considered well tolerated and effective for some nerve blocks but there are certain areas, such as truncal blocks, where a lack of robust data precludes useful comparison. The new frontiers for further research are represented by the application of USG during epidural analgesia or spinal anaesthesia as, in these cases, the evidence for the value of the use of ultrasound is limited to the preprocedure identification of the anatomy, providing the operator with a better idea of the depth and angle of the epidural or spinal space. USGRA can be considered an essential part of the curriculum of the anaesthesiologist with a defined training and certification path. Our recommendations will require considerable changes to some training programmes, and it will be necessary for these to be phased in before compliance becomes mandatory.

Pain management after open liver resection: Procedure-Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT) recommendations

Background and objectives

Effective pain control improves postoperative rehabilitation and enhances recovery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the available evidence and to develop recommendations for optimal pain management after open liver resection using Procedure-Specific Postoperative Pain Management (PROSPECT) methodology.

Strategy and selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the English language from January 2010 to October 2019 assessing pain after liver resection using analgesic, anesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases.

Results

Of 121 eligible studies identified, 31 RCTs and 3 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and intraoperative interventions that improved postoperative pain relief were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, continuous thoracic epidural analgesia, and subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks. Limited procedure-specific evidence was found for intravenous dexmedetomidine, intravenous magnesium, intrathecal morphine, quadratus lumborum blocks, paravertebral nerve blocks, continuous local anesthetic wound infiltration and postoperative interpleural local anesthesia. No evidence was found for intravenous lidocaine, ketamine, dexamethasone and gabapentinoids.

Conclusions

Based on the results of this review, we suggest an analgesic strategy for open liver resection, including acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, combined with thoracic epidural analgesia or bilateral oblique subcostal TAP blocks. Systemic opioids should be considered as rescue analgesics. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm and clarify the efficacy of the recommended analgesic regimen in the context of an enhanced recovery program.

Serratus intercostal interfascial plane block in supraumbilical surgery: a prospective randomized comparison

BACKGROUND

Upper abdominal wall surgical incisions may lead to a severe postoperative pain. Therefore, adequate analgesia is important. Here we investigate whether the low serratus-intercostal interfascial plane block (SIPB) achieves an effective analgesia, considering opioids consumption, pain control and recovery quality in upper abdominal surgeries.

METHODS

This blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted on 102 patients undergoing open upper abdominal wall surgery under general anesthesia. All patients who received serratus-intercostal plane block at the eighth rib as analgesic technique were included in SIPB group and in control group those who received continuous intravenous morphine analgesia. Pain scores in numeric verbal scale (NVS) and opioids consumption at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively were assessed. The quality of the postoperative recovery was evaluated using the QoR-15 questionnaire at 24 hours.

RESULTS

This study showed lower postoperative opioid consumption at 24 hours (P<0.0001; 4.17 mg vs. 41.52 mg of morphine) and better pain control (P<0.005) with mean pain scores (NVS 1.8±1.5 vs. 4.8±1.6) in group 0 (SIPB). The global QoR-15 scores 24 hours postoperatively were higher (better quality) in the SIPB group (122 vs. 100).

CONCLUSIONS

The low serratus-intercostal interfascial plane block (SIPB) provides efficient analgesia leading to a saving of opioids and improvement of the recovery quality in patients undergoing upper abdominal wall surgeries.

Intermittent Boluses of Local Anesthetic Through Quadratus Lumborum Catheters for Analgesia in a Living Donor Hepatectomy

The demand for liver transplants in the United States far exceeds the supply of organs. As need has increased, so has use of living donors. Coagulopathy and various side effects often preclude the use of neuraxial regional techniques and opioids for postoperative analgesia in patients with large "J" incisions. Here, we present a 25-year-old male undergoing a living donor hepatectomy who received quadratus lumborum catheters placed percutaneously after closure of incision and prior to emergence to provide excellent analgesia and a viable opioid-sparing approach. Quadratus lumborum catheters are a safe option for a multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to analgesia.

Ultrasound and Plastic Surgery: Clinical Applications of the Newest Technology

BACKGROUND

Color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) has not been routinely used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Barriers to use have included large, cumbersome equipment, low-definition images, cost, and availability. In addition, programs in plastic surgery have not included training with ultrasound (US); thus, many current-day practitioners are unfamiliar with and reluctant to use this technology. Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated the utility of US in surgical planning. With the miniaturization, clearer imaging, and decreased costs of the latest US technology, previous barriers to use have largely been eliminated.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients scheduled for either reconstructive or aesthetic surgery were evaluated preoperatively and/or intraoperatively by a single surgeon with the linear 12-4 probe of a Philips Lumify CDUS device (Philips, Reedsville, Penn). For patients undergoing flap reconstruction, potential donor sites were imaged in order to locate the largest perforator. For patients undergoing abdominal procedures, intraoperative visualization of the abdominal muscular layers was used for the delivery of anesthesia during transversus abdominis plane block. Lastly, the superficial fascial system (SFS) was subjectively evaluated in all preoperative patients.

RESULTS

For flap reconstruction, 11 patients were preoperatively examined with CDUS in order to locate the largest perforators prior to perforator flap reconstruction. Flaps studied included the deep inferior epigastric perforator, anterolateral thigh, tensor fascia lata, thoracodorsal artery perforator, superior gluteal artery perforator, and the gracilis musculocutaneous. Color Doppler ultrasound findings were confirmed intraoperatively for all cases (100%). In 2 (18.2%) of 11 cases, CDUS identified perforators not detected by computed tomography angiography. Twenty-five patients undergoing either abdominoplasty or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction had successful intraoperative visualization of the abdominal wall muscular layers, thus allowing administration of transversus abdominis plane blocks by the operating surgeon. Twenty patients undergoing body contouring surgery had preoperative visualization of the SFS. The SFS was found to be varied not only among different patients but also within individual patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The newest, miniaturized CDUS technology has a variety of applications that may improve patient outcomes and experience in plastic surgery. Our observations require further investigation to quantify the perceived benefits of this new technology.

The Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia using transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a newer and safer method that can be used in patients undergoing liver transplant surgeries. This systematic review and meta-analysis was done to quantify the analgesic potential and opioid-sparing capability of TAP block in these patients.

Methods

The studies comparing TAP-block to conventional analgesic regimens for liver transplant were searched. The studies evaluating the comparative 24-h morphine consumption during postoperative period in patients undergoing liver transplant surgeries were searched and included as the primary outcome in the analysis.

Results

We found two randomised controlled trials and two retrospective studies that on meta-analysis showed that TAP block group had significantly lower requirement of morphine (WMD=27.59 mg; 95% CI: 33.47-21.70) at 24 h for pain mitigation. Also, postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower (RR=0.76; 95% CI: 0.47-1.22) but not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided TAP block provides postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing liver transplant surgeries. This study was registered in International prospective register of systematic reviews [PROSPERO: CRD42018094595].

Recovery of the Psoas Muscle Index in Living Donors after a Right Lobe Hepatectomy for Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

The development of sarcopenia leads to adverse postoperative outcomes. However, no study has investigated perioperative loss in core muscle and the correlation between core muscle and residual liver volume in living donors for liver transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 457 adult healthy donors who underwent a right lobe hepatectomy without the middle hepatic vein for elective liver transplant were retrospectively analyzed. Abdominal computed tomography was performed within 1 month before surgery and the first week and 3 months after the surgery. The average psoas muscle area between lumbar vertebrae 3 and 4 was measured and normalized by height squared (psoas muscle index [PMI] = psoas muscle area/height²). The initial whole liver volume and remnant left lobe volume were measured on computed tomography images.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 279 men (61.1%) and 178 women (38.9%). The median preoperative PMIs were 420.9 mm²/m² (interquartile range, 360.6-487.0 mm²/m²) in men and 280.9 mm²/m² (interquartile range, 243.5-318.7 mm²/m²) in women. The PMIs in men and women significantly decreased during the first week after surgery, and gradually recovered to preoperative levels during the first 3 months after surgery. Based on the ratio between the remnant left lobe and initial whole liver volume (≥30%), the increase in remnant left lobe volume was not correlated with the decrease in PMI on postoperative day 7. A postoperative U-shaped recovery in the core muscles was present in both male and female donors, independent of the remnant liver ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the requirements of partial liver regeneration and surgical wound repair, healthy donors did not suffer from sustained core muscle loss after surgery.

Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair

Introduction:

Ventral hernia is a commonly performed surgical procedure in adults. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) of ventral hernia is procedure of choice. IPOM of ventral hernia is associated with significant pain. Hence, our aim was to study the efficacy of instilling preemptive local analgesia for reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs.

Objective:

To study the role of local infiltration of 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine in the anterior abdominal wall preoperatively to improve pain scores compared to conventional intravenous systemic analgesia.

Materials and Methods:

The study pool consists of two groups of patients (25 in each group) admitted for laparoscopic uncomplicated ventral hernia repair. Analysis was performed by the SPSS program (Company – International Business Machines Corporation, headquartered at Armonk, New York, USA) for Windows, version 17.0. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using ANOVA. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test.

Results:

Both groups were matching in terms of demographic features. Postoperatively, pain assessment was performed every 30 min for the first 2 h and was followed up for a period of 24 h at intervals (4, 6, 12, and 24 h). Postoperatively, patients were also assessed for time of ambulation, time of return of bowel sounds at 6, 12, and 24 h, and length of hospital stay. Side effects and complication were noted.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrated that supplementing US-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block to conventional systemic analgesics resulted in decreased VAS scores and decreased requirement of rescue analgesics. The patients ambulated early had earlier appearance of bowel sounds and decreased length of hospital stay. There was also decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting. TAP block for laparoscopic IPOM surgery significantly decreases postoperative pain and opioid requirement in patients.

Enhanced Recovery via Peripheral Nerve Block for Open Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now commonplace in many fields of surgery, but only limited data exists for their use in hepatobiliary surgery. We implemented standardized ERAS protocols for all open hepatectomies and replaced thoracic epidurals with a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing open hepatectomy during the 14 months before and 19 months after implementation of an ERAS protocol at our institution (January 2014-September 2016). Trained abstractors reviewed charts for patient demographics, perioperative details, and healthcare utilization. All nursing-reported visual analog scale pain scores were sampled to identify patients with uncontrolled pain (daily mean score > 5). Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), costs, and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients (mean age 54.6 ± 13.0 years, 44% female) underwent open liver resection (69 [54%] after ERAS implementation). ERAS protocols were associated with significantly lower rates of ICU admission (47 vs. 13%, p < 0.001), shorter LOS (median 5.3 vs. 4.3 days, p = 0.007), and lower median costs ($3566 less, p = 0.03). Readmission remained low throughout the study period (5% pre-ERAS, 4% during ERAS, p = 0.83). Rates of uncontrolled pain were either the same or better after ERAS implementation through post-operative day #3 (41% pre-ERAS, 23% during ERAS, p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

The use of TAP block for hepatectomy as part of an ERAS protocol is associated with improved quality and cost of care. Surgeons performing liver resections should consider standardization of evidence-based best practices in all patients.

Ultrasound-guided lateral and subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in calves: a cadaveric study

OBJECTIVE

To describe and assess the ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block feasibility in calf cadavers, to compare two injection volumes and to evaluate possible undesired solution spreads.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, descriptive, anatomic study.

ANIMALS

A group of 15 bovine cadavers weighing 47±11 kg (mean±standard deviation).

METHODS

Lateral (n = 24) and subcostal (n = 12) TAP block approaches were assessed. For each approach, two volumes (0.2 or 0.4 mL kg^-1) of toluidine blue and contrast medium were injected using both sides of the animals. Nerve staining was assessed by anatomical dissection and spread of injectate by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Objective and subjective technique feasibility was evaluated by a specific score (poor, good, excellent).

RESULTS

Using the lateral approach, 58%, 92% and 25% and 75%, 83% and 25% of the thirteenth thoracic, first and second lumbar nerves were stained by 0.2 and 0.4 mL kg^-1, respectively. Craniocaudal and dorsoventral solution spread and number of blocks that adequately stained an individual nerve were not significantly different between the volumes. Using the subcostal approach, 67%, 83%, 67%, 67% and 50%, and 83%, 100%, 83%, 83% and 50% of the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, twelfth thoracic nerves were stained by 0.2 and 0.4 mL kg^-1, respectively. With both techniques, no intraspinal and one intraperitoneal spread were observed. Objective and subjective feasibility score was excellent for both approaches in the majority of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

TAP injections were easy to perform with both techniques in calf cadavers. The volume of injectate did not influence spread. The authors conclude that a combination of the two approaches is necessary, but perhaps not sufficient, to stain all of the nerves innervating the ventral abdominal wall. Further studies are required to refine the technique and evaluate its efficacy in preventing nociception in calves.

Thoracic epidural analgesia in donor hepatectomy: An analysis

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether supplementation of general anesthesia (GA) with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for right lobe donor hepatectomy is a safe modality of pain relief in terms of changes in postoperative coagulation profile, incidence of epidural catheter-related complications, and timing of removal of epidural catheter. Retrospective analysis of the record of 104 patients who received TEA for right lobe donor hepatectomy was done. Platelet count, international normalized ratio, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase were recorded postoperatively until the removal of the epidural catheter. The day of removal of the epidural catheter and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also recorded. Any complication encountered was documented. Intraoperatively, central venous pressure (CVP), hemodynamic variables, and volume of intravenous fluids infused were also noted. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS statistical package, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. A total of 90% of patients had mean VAS scores between 1 and 4 in the postoperative period between days 1 and 5. None of the patients had a VAS score above 5. Although changes in coagulation status were encountered in all patients in the postoperative period, these changes were transient and did not persist beyond postoperative day (POD) 5. There was no delay in removal of the epidural catheter, and the majority of patients had the catheter removed by POD 4. There was no incidence of epidural hematoma. Aside from good intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, TEA in combination with balanced GA and fluid restriction enabled maintenance of low CVP and prevention of hepatic congestion. In conclusion, vigilant use of TEA appears to be safe during donor hepatectomy. Living liver donors should not be denied efficient analgesia for the fear of complications. Liver Transplantation 24 214-221 2018 AASLD.