Practice advisory on the prevention and management of complications of pediatric regional anesthesia

State of the Art in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Narrative Review about the Use of Preoperative Time

This review delves into the challenge of pediatric anesthesia, underscoring the necessity for tailored perioperative approaches due to children's distinctive anatomical and physiological characteristics. Because of the vulnerability of pediatric patients to critical incidents during anesthesia, provider skills are of primary importance. Yet, almost equal importance must be granted to the adoption of a careful preanesthetic mindset toward patients and their families that recognizes the interwoven relationship between children and parents. In this paper, the preoperative evaluation process is thoroughly examined, from the first interaction with the child to the operating day. This evaluation process includes a detailed exploration of the medical history of the patient, physical examination, optimization of preoperative therapy, and adherence to updated fasting management guidelines. This process extends to considering pharmacological or drug-free premedication, focusing on the importance of preanesthesia re-evaluation. Structural resources play a critical role in pediatric anesthesia; components of this role include emphasizing the creation of child-friendly environments and ensuring appropriate support facilities. The results of this paper support the need for standardized protocols and guidelines and encourage the centralization of practices to enhance clinical efficacy.

Optimizing the Postoperative Management of Children Undergoing Resection of High-Risk Abdominal Neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment in high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB), but there exists wide variability in perioperative management practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate two standardized adult perioperative enhanced recovery practices (ERPs) in pediatric patients undergoing open resection of abdominal HR-NB.

METHODS

All patients with abdominal HR-NB surgically resected at a free-standing children's hospital between 12/2010 and 7/2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Perioperative ERPs of interest included avoidance of routine nasogastric tube (NGT) use and the use of neuraxial anesthesia. Primary outcomes included time to enteral intake, urinary catheter use, opioid utilization, and length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Overall, 37 children, median age 33 months (IQR: 20-48 months), were identified. Avoidance of an NGT allowed for earlier feeding after surgery (P = .03). Neuraxial anesthesia use more frequently required an indwelling urinary catheter (P < .01) for a longer duration (P = .02), with no difference in total opioid utilization (P = .77) compared to patients without neuraxial anesthesia. Postoperative LOS was unaffected by avoidance of routine NGT use (P = .68) or use of neuraxial anesthesia (P = .89).

CONCLUSION

Children undergoing open resection of abdominal HR-NB initiated diet sooner when an NGT was not left postoperatively, and the need for a urinary catheter was significantly higher in patients who received neuraxial anesthesia. However, these two ERP components did not decrease postoperative LOS. To optimize the postoperative management of NB patients, postoperative NGTs should be avoided, while the benefit of neuraxial anesthesia is less clear as it necessitates the placement of a urinary catheter without decreasing opioid utilization.

Different Analgesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain in Children Undergoing Abdominal Surgery for Intractable Constipation: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Single Tertiary Children's Hospital

Functional constipation in the pediatric population is a prevalent issue that is usually well managed. However, in rare cases, conservative treatment fails, and surgical intervention is necessary. This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe and compare different perioperative analgesic techniques in children undergoing major abdominal surgery for intractable constipation. Conducted between 2011 and 2021, this study enrolled patients under 18 years old who underwent initial major abdominal surgery for intractable constipation (i.e., creation of ostomy or subtotal colectomy). Patients were categorized according to the perioperative analgesic technique (i.e., systemic, neuraxial, or truncal block). Of 65 patients, 46 (70.8%) were female, and the median age was 13.5 [8.8-16.1] years during initial major abdominal surgery. Systemic analgesia was used in 43 (66.2%), neuraxial in 17 (26.2%), and truncal blocks in 5 (7.7%) of the surgeries. Patients with neuraxial analgesia reported less postoperative pain (median [interquartile range] numeric rating scale (NRS) 2.0 [0-4.0]), compared to systemic analgesia (5.0 [2.0-7.0], p < 0.001) and to truncal blocks (5.0 [3.0-6.5], p < 0.001). In this preliminary investigation, neuraxial analgesia appears to be the most effective approach to reducing acute postoperative pain in pediatric patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for intractable functional constipation. However, well-designed studies are warranted.

Erector spinae plane block versus caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Erector spinae plane block is a promising strategy for pain management in some settings. However, the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block versus caudal block in pediatric inguinal hernia repair has yet to be formally investigated.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients aged 2-5 years undergoing unilateral open inguinal hernia repair randomly received unilateral erector spinae plane block (0.2% ropivacaine 0.5 mL kg-1), caudal block (0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL kg-1), or no block. The primary outcome was time to the first rescue analgesia, defined as the interval from the end of surgery to the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability scale greater than three. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, the area under the curve of pain scores over time, satisfaction of guardians, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The median time to the first rescue analgesia was longer in the erector spinae plane block group than in the caudal block group [10.0 h (interquartile range, 6.6-24.0 h) vs. 5.0 h (interquartile range, 2.9-7.3 h); p < .001]. The Cox regression model demonstrated that the risk of postoperative rescue analgesia requirement was 0.38 in children receiving erector spinae plane block compared with caudal block (95% confidence interval 0.23-0.64; p < .001). Additionally, the area under the curve of the pain scores over time was lower in the erector spinae plane block group than in the caudal block group (44.3 [36.6-50.7] vs. 59.0 [47.1-64.5]; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Erector spinae plane block provided superior postoperative analgesia compared to caudal block in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; ChiCTR2100048303.