Quantitative measures of functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with C5 palsy

Management of C5 Palsy After Anterior Cervical Decompression Using Oberlin Nerve Transfer: A Case Report

C5 palsy is a potential complication of cervical decompression surgery from which many patients do not recover or partially recover function. We present the case of a 48-year-old patient who developed elbow flexion paralysis after anterior decompression surgery with fusion of the C5-C7 levels. Muscle function was not spontaneously restored until eight months after surgery. In this case, we performed an Oberlin procedure to restore the function of the arm. Muscle strength (5/5) and volume were obtained 13 months after surgery. A reasonable waiting period is required after C5 palsy in case spontaneous recovery occurs. Treatment decision should be based on the patient's symptoms. Nerve transfers have been shown to be effective when performed after six months, especially in Oberlin transfer.

Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy

C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an independent risk factor for C5 palsy. In this study, we tried to investigate different techniques for foramen decompression with posterior cervical fusion and assess the incidence of C5 palsy with each technique depending on the order of foraminal decompression. A combined 540° approach with LMS and uncovertebrectomy was used in group 1. Group 2 combined a 540° approach with pedicle screws and posterior foraminotomy, while posterior approach only with pedicle screws and foraminotomy was used in group 3. For groups 2 and 3, prophylactic posterior foraminotomy was performed before laminectomy. Motor manual testing to assess C5 palsy, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined before and after surgery. Simple radiographs, MRI and CT scans, were obtained to assess radiologic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 362 patients were enrolled in this study: 208 in group 1, 72 in group 2, and 82 in group 3. The mean age was 63.2, 65.5, and 66.6 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median for fused levels was 4 for the three groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of fused levels. Weight, height, comorbidities, and diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative JOA scores were similar between groups (p = 0.256), whereas the preoperative NDI score was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.040). Mean JOA score at 12-month follow-up was 15.5 ± 1.89, 16.1 ± 1.48, and 16.1 ± 1.48 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.008) and in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.024). NDI score at 12 months was 13, 12, and 13 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was significantly better in group 3 than in group 1 (p = 0.040), but there were no other significant differences between groups. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly lower in posterior foraminotomy groups with pedicle screws (groups 2 and 3) than in LMS with uncovertebrectomy (group 1) (p < 0.001). Thus, preventive expansive foraminotomy before decompressive laminectomy is able to significantly decrease the root tethering by stenotic lesion, and subsequently, decrease the incidence of C5 palsy associated with posterior only or combined posterior and anterior cervical fusion surgeries. Additionally, such expansive foraminotomy might be appropriate with pedicle screw insertion based on biomechanical considerations.

Alteration of muscle activity during voluntary rehabilitation training with single-joint Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) in patients with shoulder elevation dysfunction from cervical origin

Shoulder elevation, defined here as arm raising, being essential for activities of daily living, dysfunctions represent a substantial burden in patients' lives. Owing to the complexity of the shoulder joint, the tightly coordinated muscular activity is a fundamental component, and neuromuscular impairments have devastating effects. A single-joint shoulder type version of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) allowing motion assistance based on the intention of the user via myoelectric activation has recently been developed, and its safety was demonstrated for shoulder rehabilitation. Yet, little is known about the physiological effects of the device. This study aims to monitor the changes in muscle activity and motion during shoulder HAL rehabilitation in several patients suffering from shoulder elevation dysfunction from cervical radicular origin. 8 patients (6 males, 2 females, mean age 62.4 ± 9.3 years old) with weakness of the deltoid muscle resulting from a damage to the C5 nerve root underwent HAL-assisted rehabilitation. We combined surface electromyography and three-dimensional motion capture to record muscular activity and kinematics. All participants showed functional recovery, with improvements in their Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) scores and range of motion (ROM). During training, HAL decreased the activity of deltoid and trapezius, significantly more for the latter, as well as the coactivation of both muscles. We also report a reduction of the characteristic shrugging compensatory motion which is an obstacle to functional recovery. This reduction was notably demonstrated by a stronger reliance on the deltoid rather than the trapezius, indicating a muscle coordination tending toward a pattern similar to healthy individuals. Altogether, the results of the evaluation of motion and muscular changes hint toward a functional recovery in acute, and chronic shoulder impairments from cervical radicular origin following shoulder HAL rehabilitation training and provide information on the physiological effect of the device.

Analysis of the Risk Factors for C5 Nerve Palsy After Cervical Posterior Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy-From the Perspective of Cervical Sagittal Parameters

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the sagittal radiological parameters related to the occurrence of C5 nerve palsy after cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty for the patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients who underwent cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty were reviewed retrospectively from March 2017 to March 2022. The C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertex axis, thoracic inlet angle, neck tilt, T1 slope, and encroachment ratio of ossification were measured on X-rays. The enrolled patients were divided into C5 nerve palsy and control groups. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the potential risk factors for the occurrence of C5 nerve palsy. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the significance of the results and the optimal diagnostic value.

RESULTS

The results of logistic regression showed that only the T1 slope and encroachment ratio were variables that were responsible for C5 nerve palsy (P = 0.024; P = 0.04). The ROC curve analysis for the T1 slope showed that the cutoff value was 21.3° and the AUC was 0.796. The ROC curve analysis for the encroachment ratio revealed that the cutoff value was 0.21 and the AUC was 0.763. Both analyses demonstrated good diagnostic value for C5 nerve palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative T1 slope and encroachment ratio were variables that were risk factors for C5 nerve palsy in patients who underwent cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty.

Postoperative C5 Palsy Following Cervical Laminectomy With Instrumented Fusion Versus Cervical Laminoplasty With Reconstruction: Single Surgeon and National Inpatient Cohort Analyses

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate whether cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion (LF) and cervical laminoplasty with reconstruction (LP) are associated with different rates C5 palsy (C5P) at 1-month follow-up in a single surgeon and nationally representative cohort.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

LF and LP both carry a well-known risk of nerve root injury that most commonly presents as C5P which can reduce patient satisfaction, patient function, and impede patient recovery. The procedure type that is more frequently associated with C5P remains largely unclear.

METHODS

We identified patients undergoing primary LF or LP procedures for the treatment of cervical myelopathy in both a single-surgeon series cohort (2004-2018; Mount Sinai Hospital) and a nationally representative cohort drawn from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2006-2017). For the single-surgeon cohort, C5P within 1 month of surgery was recorded. For the NSQIP cohort, peripheral nerve injury (PNI) within 1 month of surgery was recorded and used as a proxy for C5P. Postoperative complications including C5P were compared between cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between procedure type and postoperative C5P or PNI.

RESULTS

Without adjusting for covariates, LF patients had a higher rate of 1-month C5P in the single-surgeon cohort (8% vs. 0%, P=0.01). An adjusted odds ratio could not be obtained due to the absence of C5P in the LP group. In the national cohort, LP patients had a significantly higher rate of 1-month PNI on unadjusted analysis (11% vs. 16%, P<0.001). After adjusting for covariates, we found no significant difference in odds of 1-month PNI between LF and LP (adjusted odds ratio=0.84, P=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the single-surgeon series suggest that cervical LF is associated with significantly higher rates of postoperative C5P as compared with LP. These findings are not corroborated by nationally representative data, which showed no difference in PNI rates between LF and LP. A surgeon's training and experience likely contribute to which procedure has a higher propensity for a C5P as a complication. Regardless, both LF and LP patients should be closely monitored for new-onset C5P during follow-up visits.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Radiographic Measures of Spinal Alignment Are Not Predictive of the Development of C5 Palsy Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative C5 palsy is a common complication following cervical decompression, occurring more frequently after posterior-based procedures. It has been theorized that this is the result of C5 nerve stretch resulting from spinal cord drift with these procedures. As such, it is thought to be less common after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). However, no consensus has been reached on its true etiology. The purpose of this study is to assess the rate of C5 palsy following ACDF and to determine whether any radiographic or demographic parameters were predictive of its development.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-six patients who received ACDF between September 2015 and September 2016 were reviewed, and 122 were included in the final analysis. Patient demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were analyzed, including preoperative and postoperative radiographic and motor examination results. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between independent groups, and Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables between groups.

RESULTS

Seven patients developed a C5 palsy in the postoperative period, an incidence rate of 5.7%. Among the radiographic parameters evaluated, there were no statistically significant differences between the C5 palsy and nonpalsy groups. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in age, patient sex, or numbers of vertebral levels fused between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultimately, we did not identify any statistically significant demographic or radiographic predictive factors for the development of C5 palsy following ACDF surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The Use of Preoperative and Intraoperative Pavlov Ratio to Predict the Risk of Postoperative C5 Palsy after Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Myelopathy

BACKGROUND

No standard preoperative preventive measure has been established to decrease the occurrence of C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty. The aim of this study is to establish a reliable measured parameter in predicting the risk of the postoperative C5 palsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 276 patients receiving posterior open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy were studied. The patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative Pavlov ratio (Group A: Pavlov ratio <0.65 and Group B: Pavlov ratio ≥0.65). Correlations between the occurrence of postoperative C5 palsy and Pavlov ratio were analyzed, and Group A was further tested. The surgical procedures, clinical symptoms, and Pavlov ratio were described.

RESULTS

The patients with Pavlov ratio <0.65 had a higher risk of developing postoperative C5 palsy (P < 0.05, odds ratio [OR] = 2.91). No significant difference was found in gender, age, etiology, type of operation, and pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between patients with and without postoperative C5 palsy. The cutoff (1.01) of receiver operating characteristic curve of the postoperative Pavlov ratio of the Group A was calculated. The postoperative Pavlov ratio ≥1.01 of the patients in Group A was a significant risk factor of the development of postoperative C5 palsy (P < 0.01, OR = 10.83).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative Pavlov ratio <0.65 at the C5 level was more likely to develop the postoperative C5 palsy. When the preoperative Pavlov ratio is <0.65, the postoperative Pavlov ratio ≥1.01 at the C5 level is a reliable predictor for the development of postoperative C5 palsy. Pavlov ratio may be one of the reasons for postoperative C5 palsy.

Impact of the surgical strategy on the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy in decompressive cervical surgery

Objective

Our aim was to identify the impact of different surgical strategies on the incidence of C5 palsy.

Background

Degenerative cervical spinal stenosis is a steadily increasing morbidity in the ageing population. Postoperative C5 nerve root palsy is a common complication with severe impact on the patients´ quality of life.

Methods

We identified 1708 consecutive patients who underwent cervical decompression surgery due to degenerative changes. The incidence of C5 palsy and surgical parameters including type and level of surgery were recorded to identify predictors for C5 nerve palsy.

Results

The overall C5 palsy rate was 4.8%, with 18.3% of cases being bilateral. For ACDF alone the palsy rate was low (1.13%), compared to 14.0% of C5 palsy rate after corpectomy. The risk increased with extension of the procedures. Hybrid constructs with corpectomy plus ACDF at C3-6 showed significantly lower rates of C5 palsy (10.7%) than corpectomy of two vertebrae (p = 0.005). Multiple regression analysis identified corpectomy of C4 or C5 as a significant predictor. We observed a lower overall incidence for ventral (4.3%) compared to dorsal (10.9%) approaches (p<0.001). When imaging detected a postoperative shift of the spinal cord at index segment C4/5, palsy rate increased significantly (33.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.034).

Conclusions

Extended surgical strategies, such as dorsal laminectomies, multilevel corpectomies and procedures with extensive spinal cord shift were shown to display a high risk of C5 palsy. The use of extended procedures should therefore be employed cautiously. Switching to combined surgical methods like ACDF plus corpectomy can reduce the rate of C5 palsy.

Incidence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical surgery: A meta-analysis for last decade

PURPOSE

We aim to perform a meta-analysis on incidence of C5 nerve root palsy (C5 palsy) for patients after cervical surgery.

METHODS

An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI, and WANFANG databases on incidence of C5 palsy from January 2007 to January 2017. Prevalence of C5 palsy related to different surgery methods was calculated and data analysis was conducted with STATA 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 61 studies containing 721 patients with C5 palsy in total 11,481 patients (6.3%) were included in our study. The incidences after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior corpectomy combined with discectomy (ACCDF), laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy and fusion (LF) were 5.5%, 7.5%, 6%, 4.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. Compared with anterior approaches (5%), female patients (4%) and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) (4.8%), posterior approaches (6.2%), male patients (5.7%) and patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) (8.1%) have a higher prevalence. In ACDF and LP, patients with OPLL (5.5%, 8.1%, respectively) have a higher incidence than those in patients with CSM (4.7%, 3.1%, respectively); however, in LF, patients with CSM and OPLL have similar incidence of C5 palsy (13% vs 13.1%). In most cases, C5 palsy was unilateral (74.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis, posterior approaches, male patients and patients with OPLL have a higher incidence of C5 palsy. In ACDF and LP, patients with OPLL have a higher incidence of C5 palsy, but in LF, patients with CSM and OPLL have similar result.

C5 nerve root palsy after posterior cervical spine surgery

BACKGROUND

C5 palsy is a serious complication after cervical decompression surgery in which the patient shows a deterioration in power of the deltoid or biceps brachii by at least one grade in the manual muscle test without aggravation of lower extremity function. Although there are several hypotheses regarding the etiology of C5 palsy, the pathogenesis and preventive measures remain unidentified and many other controversies remain.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the clinical features, risk factors, mechanism, and preventive measures of C5 palsy after posterior cervical decompression surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed was searched to identify eligible studies that contained more than 10 cases and focused on C5 palsy. Microsoft Excel was used to analyze the data. Statistical comparisons were made when appropriate.

RESULTS

Out of 718 papers involving C5 palsy, 28 met the inclusion criteria. The average incidence rate was 7.8% (range, 1.4-23.0%). Risk factors for C5 palsy included age, male gender, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and stenosis of the C4-C5 intervertebral foramen. C5 palsy occurred from immediately to 2 months after surgery, and recovery time ranged from 48 h to 41 months. Hypotheses for the mechanism of C5 palsy included root involvement and spinal cord impairment. Foraminotomy and intraoperative neuromonitoring were the two main methods used to prevent C5 palsy.

CONCLUSION

C5 palsy is a serious complication occurring at the early stage after cervical decompression surgery. Foraminotomy and intraoperative neuromonitoring were the two main methods to prevent C5 palsy. The incidence of C5 palsy is low, but it can place a serious burden on the patients' quality of life and finances. The risk factors and mechanism of C5 palsy are still controversial. However, under conservative therapy, the prognosis is usually good. Higher quality studies are necessary for drawing more reliable and convincing conclusions about this disease.

Differences in the time of onset of postoperative upper limb palsy among surgical procedures: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The time of onset of postoperative upper limb palsy (ULP), also referred to as C5 palsy, varies among patients. Although some studies addressed the relationship between the time of onset of ULP and the potential etiologies, no meta-analysis has been conducted regarding the association between the time of onset of ULP and other factors such as surgical procedure type and treated diseases.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate differences in the time of onset of ULP among spinal surgical procedures and treated diseases to understand its etiology.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a meta-analysis.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The time of onset of ULP after cervical decompression surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis via searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Upper limb palsy within 2 days postoperatively or at 3 days or more postoperatively was defined as early- and late-onset, respectively. We calculated the pooled prevalence of early- and late-onset ULP with regard to surgical procedures and diseases using a random effects model. The proportion of early-onset ULP relative to all ULP was also determined. Surgical procedures were categorized into four procedures: (1) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); (2) anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF); (3) laminoplasty or laminectomy (LPN); and (4) posterior spinal fusion with decompression (PSF). Treated diseases were classified as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and non-OPLL.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of early-onset ULP was significantly stratified across three groups of surgical procedures (PSF [9.0%]>ACCF [3.7%] and LPN [2.5%]>ACDF [0.6%]). In the pooled analysis of late-onset ULP prevalence, three procedures (PSF [4.3%], ACCF [2.8%], and LPN [2.9%]) were similar, but ACDF (1.0%) was associated with a significantly lower prevalence than LPN. The prevalence of both early- and late-onset ULP was significantly higher with OPLL than without OPLL. However, the proportion of early-onset ULP relative to all ULP was similar between non-OPLL and OPLL (50.8% vs. 49.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The high prevalence of early-onset ULP in PSF is attributable to a lag correction effect, which is triggered by posterior correction and fusion through comparison with LPN. The combination of our meta-analysis results and previous knowledge facilitates our understanding of the etiology of ULP.

Manual muscle test at C5 palsy onset predicts the likelihood of and time to C5 palsy resolution

The primary objective of this study was to identify time to and prognostic factors of C5 palsy resolution. All patients over a 7 year period who experienced C5 palsy following a posterior decompression and instrumented fusion surgery were retrospectively reviewed. C5 palsy resolution was defined as a recovery of deltoid muscle function equal to or greater than the preoperative condition as defined by the manual muscle test (MMT). Of the 511 patients who met the selection criteria, 8.6% (n=44) experienced C5 palsy. MMT information was available for 43 patients; 81.4% (n=35) had full resolution from their condition. Of the 35 patients who resolved, the median MMT score at onset was 3-. Following a discrete-time proportional hazards model, the hazards of C5 palsy resolution increased by 19% for every one-grade increase in MMT score at symptom onset (hazard ratio [HR]=1.19, p=0.005). Moreover, males displayed a 71% lower hazard of resolution than females (HR=0.29, p=0.003). Following an adjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median time to C5 palsy resolution was between 6 months and 1 year. In a multiple linear regression, a lower MMT score at the onset of C5 palsy predicted a longer time to C5 palsy resolution (coefficient=-0.19, p=0.003). Time to C5 palsy onset was not statistically associated with hazards of palsy resolution (p=0.381) or time to resolution (p=0.121). A higher MMT score at the onset of C5 palsy statistically significantly predicted a higher chance of resolution and a shorter recovery time. Female sex was also associated with a higher hazard of resolution.

C5 Nerve root palsies following cervical spine surgery: A review

Background:

Cervical C5 nerve root palsies may occur in between 0% and 30% of routine anterior or posterior cervical spine operations. They are largely attributed to traction injuries/increased cord migration following anterior/posterior decompressions. Of interest, almost all studies cite spontaneous resolution of these deficits without surgery with 3–24 postoperative months.

Methods:

Different studies cite various frequencies for C5 root palsies following anterior or posterior cervical spine surgery. In their combined anterior/posterior series involving C4-C5 level decompressions, Libelski et al. cited up to a 12% incidence of C5 palsies. In Gu et al. series, C5 root palsies occurred in 3.1% of double-door laminoplasty, 4.5% of open-door laminoplasty, and 11.3% of laminectomy. Miller et al. observed an intermediate 6.9% frequency of C5 palsies followed by posterior cervical decompressions and fusions (PCDF).

Results:

Gu et al. also identified multiple risk factors for developing C5 palsies following posterior surgery; male gender, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), narrower foramina, laminectomy, and marked dorsal spinal cord drift. Miller et al. also identified an average $1918 increased cost for physical/occupational therapy for patients with C5 palsies.

Conclusions:

The incidence of C5 root deficits for anterior/posterior cervical surgery at C4-C5 was 12% in one series, and ranged up to 11.3% for laminectomies, while others cited 0–30%. Although identification of preoperative risk factors for C5 root deficits may help educate patients regarding these risks, there is no clear method for their avoidance at this time.

C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of the cervical spine

C5 nerve root palsy is a rare and potentially debilitating complication of cervical spine surgery. Currently, however, there are no guidelines to help surgeons to prevent or treat this complication.

We carried out a systematic review of the literature to identify the causes of this complication and options for its prevention and treatment. Searches of PubMed, Embase and Medline yielded 60 articles for inclusion, most of which addressed C5 palsy as a complication of surgery. Although many possible causes were given, most authors supported posterior migration of the spinal cord with tethering of the nerve root as being the most likely.

Early detection and prevention of a C5 nerve root palsy using neurophysiological monitoring and variations in surgical technique show promise by allowing surgeons to minimise or prevent the incidence of C5 palsy. Conservative treatment is the current treatment of choice; most patients make a full recovery within two years.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:950–5.