Implementation and outcomes of an antimicrobial stewardship program: Effectiveness of education

Economic evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship in primary care: a systematic review and quality assessment

Background

Primary care accounts for 80%–90% of antimicrobial prescriptions, making this setting an important focus for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions.

Objectives

To collate the findings and critically appraise the qualities of economic evaluation studies of AMS or related interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in primary care.

Methods

A systematic review of economic evaluations of interventions aimed at reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in primary care was performed. Published literature were retrieved through a search of Medline, Embase, EconLit and Web of Science databases for the period 2010 to 2020. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist and Good Practice Guidelines for Decision-Analytic Modelling in Health Technology Assessment.

Results

Of the 2722 records identified, 12 studies were included in the review (8 trial-based and 4 modelled evaluations). The most common AMS interventions were communication skills training for health professionals and C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP-POCT). Types of economic evaluations included in the review were cost-effectiveness (7 studies), cost-utility (1), cost-benefit (2), cost-effectiveness and cost-utility (1) and cost analysis (1). While six of the studies found AMS interventions to be cost-effective, the other six reported them as not cost-effective or inconclusive. The quality of the studies ranged from good to low.

Conclusions

There were significant variations in cost-effectiveness of AMS interventions across studies and depending on the inclusion of cost components such as the cost of antimicrobial resistance. However, communication skills training and CRP-POCT were frequently cost-effective or cost-beneficial for reducing inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing.

Impact of the Acceptance of the Recommendations Made by a Meropenem Stewardship Program in a University Hospital: A Pilot Study

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) promote appropriate antimicrobial use. We present a 4-year retrospective study that evaluated the clinical impact of the acceptance of the recommendations made by a meropenem-focused ASP. A total of 318 meropenem audits were performed. The ASP team (comprising infectious disease physicians, pharmacists and microbiologists) considered meropenem use in 96 audits (30.2%) to be inappropriate. The reasons to consider these uses inappropriate were the possibility of de-escalating to a narrower-spectrum antibiotic, in 66 (68.7%) audits, and unnecessary meropenem use, in 30 (31.3%) audits. The ASP team recommended de-escalation in 66 audits (68.7%) and discontinuation of meropenem in 30 audits (31.3%). ASP interventions were stratified according to whether or not recommendations were followed. The group in which recommendations were accepted and followed (i.e., accepted audit, AA) included 66 audits (68.7%) and the group in which recommendations were not followed (i.e., rejected audit, RA) included 30 (31.3%) audits. The comorbidity of the AA group (Charlson score) was higher than in the RA group (7.0 (5.0–9.0) vs. 6.0 (4.0–7.0), p = 0.02). Discontinuation of meropenem was recommended in 83.3% of audits in the AA group vs. 62.2% in the RA group (OR 3.05 (1.03–8.99), p = 0.04). Ertapenem de-escalation resulted in a 100% greater rate of follow-up compared with the non-carbapenem option (100% vs. 51.9%, OR 1.50 (1.21–1.860), p = 0.001). Significant differences were observed in the AA group when cultures were taken before antibiotic prescription—98.5% vs. 83.3% (p = 0.01, OR 13.0 (1.45–116.86))—or when screening cultures were taken—45.5% vs. 19.2% (p = 0.03, OR 3.5 (1.06–11.52)). There were no differences between the groups in terms of overall mortality and 30-day mortality, length of stay, Clostridiodes difficile infection, 30-day readmission or hospitalization costs. In conclusion, meropenem ASP recommendations contributed to a decrease in meropenem prescription without worsening clinical and economic outcomes.

Anatomy of a successful stewardship intervention: Improving perioperative prescribing in penicillin-allergic patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a series of quality improvement interventions to promote safe perioperative use of cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic patients improved use of first-line antibiotics and decreased costs.

DESIGN

Before-and-after trial following several educational interventions.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

This study included patients undergoing a surgical procedure involving receipt of a perioperative antibiotic other than a penicillin or carbapenem between January 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019. Patients with and without a penicillin allergy label in their electronic medical record were compared with respect to the percentage who received a cephalosporin and average antibiotic cost per patient.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team from infectious diseases, allergy, anesthesiology, surgery, and pharmacy surveyed anesthesiology providers about their use of perioperative cephalosporins in penicillin-allergic patients. Using findings from that survey, the team designed a decision-support algorithm for safe utilization and provided 2 educational forums to introduce this algorithm, emphasizing the safety of cefazolin or cefuroxime in penicillin-allergic patients without history of a severe delayed hypersensitivity reaction.

RESULTS

The percentage of penicillin-allergic patients receiving a perioperative cephalosporin improved from ∼34% to >80% following algorithm implementation and the associated educational interventions. This increase in cephalosporin use was associated with a ∼50% reduction in antibiotic cost per penicillin-allergic patient. No significant adverse reactions were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

An educational antibiotic stewardship intervention produced a significant change in clinician behavior. A simple intervention can have a significant impact, although further study is needed regarding whether this response is sustained and whether an educational intervention is similarly effective in other healthcare systems.

Rationalising antibiotic use after low-risk vaginal deliveries in a hospital setting in India

BACKGROUND

In 2017, a postoperative multidrug resistant case of urinary tract infection made obstetricians at Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research introspect the antibiotic usage in labouring mothers. Random case file reviews indicated overuse and variability of practice among care providers. This prompted us to explore ways to rationalise antibiotic use.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of obstetricians, paediatricians and quality officers was formed to run this improvement initiative at a private hospital facility in India. Review of literature advocated formulating a departmental antibiotic policy. Creating this policy and implementing it using improvement methodology helped us rationalise antibiotic usage.

INTERVENTIONS

We aimed to reduce the use of antibiotics from 42% to less than 10% in uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. We tested a series of sequential interventions using the improvement methodology of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, an approach recommended by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Learning from the PDSA cycle of the previous intervention helped decide the subsequent change ideas. The interventions included creation of a departmental antibiotic policy, staff engagement, and modification in documentation, concept of dual responsibility and team huddles as feedback opportunities. Information was analysed to understand the progress and improvement with change ideas.

RESULTS

Background analysis revealed that antibiotic usage ranged from 24% to 69% and average rate of antibiotic prophylaxis was high (42.28%) in low-risk uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. The sequential changes resulted in reduction in antibiotic usage to 10% in the target population by 4 months. Sustained improvement was noted in the following months.

CONCLUSION

We succeeded in implementing a departmental antibiotic policy aligning it with existing international guidelines and our local challenges. Antibiotic stewardship was one of the first major steps in our journey to avoid multidrug-resistant infections. Sustaining outcomes will involve continuous feedback to ensure engagement of all stakeholders in a hospital setting.

Molecular Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from ICU and Respiratory Department Patients of a Chinese University Hospital

Background

The objective of our study is to estimate the differences in molecular epidemiology and resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) isolates from the ICU and respiratory department(RD) in Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.

Methods

Carbapenemase genes associated with carbapenem resistance were studied by polymerase chain reaction(PCR). Genotyping was analyzed using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Results

Sixty non-duplicate CRAB isolates from the ICU and RD (n=30, respectively) were collected. All of CRAB strains were not resistant to colistin (0%). The CRAB strains from the ICU were significantly more resistant to tigecycline and cefoperazone/sulbactam compared with the RD (23.3% vs 0%, P=0.03; 53.3% % vs 23.3%, P=0.01, respectively). PCR detection of genes associated with CRAB revealed that the ratio in both the ICU and the RD of blaVIM-2, blaIMP-4, blaNDM-1, blaOXA-23, ampC, and mutation of CarO were present in 23.3% vs 0% (P=0.01), 40% vs 10% (P=0.02), 20% vs 0% (P=0.02), 80% vs 56.7%, 16.7% vs 13.3% and 86.7% vs 60% (P=0.04), respectively. Seven genotypes were detected by the PFGE in the RD and the ICU, respectively. Genotype I was significantly more frequent in the ICU compared with the RD (63.3% vs 36.6%, P=0.03). MLST showed that there were 10 ST genotypes in the RD and four in the ICU, but ST92 in both groups was 33.3% vs 63.3% (P=0.03), respectively.

Conclusion

There are differences in molecular epidemiology and resistance mechanisms in the CRAB isolates between the ICU and RD.

Evaluation of evidence-based urinalysis reflex to culture criteria: Impact on reducing antimicrobial usage

OBJECTIVES

To implement evidence-based urinalysis (UA) reflex criteria and to evaluate the impact of the intervention on reducing unnecessary antibiotic usage.

METHODS

A prospective intervention study was conducted on 4130 urine samples that were subjected to UA during March to May 2020. Results were analyzed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of newly implemented evidence-based criteria in predicting positive urine cultures. The intervention involved implementing evidence-based UA reflex criteria to ensure a high predictive value of the UA reflex parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of these UA parameters in predicting positive urine cultures and to assess the impact of the new UA criteria on antibiotic usage.

RESULTS

A total of 4130 patient samples were included in the study; 60.1% (n = 2484) were from female patients and 39.9% (n = 1646) were from male patients. The total number of negative urine reflex samples was 3116, which accounted for 75.4% of the total UA reflex samples. In contrast, 24.6% of the urine reflex samples (n = 1014) returned positive UA results and were reflexed to urine culture. Among the urine samples that were cultured, 9% (n = 91) were negative urine cultures, while 91.0% (n = 923) were positive urine cultures. Chi-square analysis indicated highly statistically significant associations between the combination parameters of (≥5 white blood cells (WBCs) and positive nitrite) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 516.428, p < 0.001) and (≥5 WBCs and moderate or large esterase) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 503.387, p < 0.001). Additionally, Chi-square analysis indicated a highly statistically significant association between the combination parameters of (≥5 WBCs and ≥1 bacteria) and positive urine cultures (Chi-square = 434.806, p < 0.001). The statistical analysis showed that the implementation of evidence-based UA reflex criteria significantly decreased the number of urine cultures performed and potentially decreased the number of patients inappropriately treated with antibiotics from 45.1% to 9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, ≥5 WBCs and positive nitrite yielded the highest positive predictive value of 98.00% and showed a highly significant association with positive urine cultures. It was observed that the new UA reflex criteria are highly effective in predicting positive urine cultures, thus potentially resulting in the reduction of unnecessary antibiotic usage.

Successful Incidences of Controlling Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant, and Nosocomial Infection Acinetobacter baumannii Using Antibiotic Stewardship, Infection Control Programs, and Environmental Cleaning at a Chinese University Hospital

Objective

We estimated the efficacy of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), infection control programs (ICP), and environmental cleaning (ENC) for controlling the resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) and controlling the incidence of multidrug-resistant AB (MDRAB), extensively drug-resistant AB (XDRAB), and nosocomial infection AB in the ICU (NIAB-ICU) at a university hospital.

Methods

The intervention included 4-year AMS+ICP and 3-year AMS+ICP+ENC between January 2012 and December 2019.

Results

A total of 2636 AB isolates were collected totally, and 64.98% of AB isolates were MDR and 29.97% were XDR. Preintervention and postintervention incidences of MDRAB, XDRAB, and NIAB-ICU by AMS+ICP measures ranged from 84.96% to 71.98%, 41.96% to 33.13%, and 45.6% to 38%, respectively. However, all of them were not statistically changed (P=0.085, 0.072, 0.061, separately). The preintervention and postintervention incidences of MDRAB, XDRAB, and NIAB-ICU by AMS+ICP+ENC measures ranged from 71.98% to 36.55%, 33.13% to 19.88%, and 38% to 22.5%, respectively. Statistically significant declines were observed (P=0.016, 0.041, 0.032, separately). The defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 patient-days (PD) decreased from 45±3.3 to 30.81±1.5 per 1000 PD across from 2012 to 2019, and a statistical decline was seen (P=0.01). Concurrently, the alcohol-based hand gel (ABHG) consumption per 1000 PD increased from 0.6±0.05 L to 12.5±2.3 L per 1000 PD, and a statistical increase was observed (P=0.0001). A statistically positive correlation was revealed between the DDD and incidence of MDRAB, XDRAB, and NIAB-ICU (r=0.905 and p=0.002; r=0.939 and p=0.001; r=0.956 and p=0.0002; respectively). Simultaneously, a statistically negative correlation was showed between the ABHG and incidence of MDRAB, XDRAB, and NIAB-ICU (r=-0.858 and p=0.006; r=-0.888 and p=0.003; r=-0.882 and p=0.004, separately).

Conclusion

The AMS, ICP, and ENC may be one of the most effective and best measures to address the increasing incidence of MDRAB, XDRAB, and NIAB-ICU currently.

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in India: Evaluation of post-prescription review and feedback as a method of promoting optimal antimicrobial use in the intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital

OBJECTIVE

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are effective in developed countries. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of an infectious disease (ID) physician-driven post-prescription review and feedback as an ASP strategy in India, a low middle-income country (LMIC).

DESIGN AND SETTING

This prospective cohort study was carried out for 18 months in 2 intensive care units of a tertiary-care hospital, consisting of 3 phases: baseline, intervention, and follow up. Each phase spanned 6 months.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients aged ≥15 years receiving 48 hours of study antibiotics were recruited for the study.

METHODS

During the intervention phase, an ID physician reviewed the included cases and gave alternate recommendations if the antibiotic use was inappropriate. Acceptance of the recommendations was measured after 48 hours. The primary outcome of the study was days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 study patient days (PD).

RESULTS

Overall, 401 patients were recruited in the baseline phase, 381 patients were recruited in the intervention phase, and 379 patients were recruited in the follow-up phase. Antimicrobial use decreased from 831.5 during the baseline phase to 717 DOT per 1,000 PD in the intervention phase (P &lt; .0001). The effect was sustained in the follow-up phase (713.6 DOT per 1,000 PD). De-escalation according to culture susceptibility improved significantly in the intervention phase versus the baseline phase (42.7% vs 23.6%; P &lt; .0001). Overall, 73.3% of antibiotic prescriptions were inappropriate. Recommendations by the ID team were accepted in 60.7% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The ID physician-driven implementation of an ASP was successful in reducing antibiotic utilization in an acute-care setting in India.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Are Required in a Department of Surgery: "How" Is the Question A Quasi-Experimental Study: Results after Three Years

Objective: Our aim was to describe our antimicrobial stewardship program and the methodology based on the results in a surgical department. Methods: Our study was a quasi-experimental study conducted from January 1, 2009, through September 30, 2017. The site was the General and Digestive Surgery Department in a public primary referral center, the University Hospital of Getafe (Madrid, Spain). We implemented the antimicrobial stewardship program following a prospective audit and feedback model, with a surgeon incorporated into the manaagement group. We studied the deaths and 30-day re-admission rates, length of stay, prevalence of gram-negative bacilli, meropenem resistance, and days of treatment with meropenem. Results: After three years of the program, we recorded a significant decrease in Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence, a significant increase in Klebsiella pneumoniae prevalence, a decrease in meropenem resistance, and a reduction in meropenem days of treatment. Conclusions: Antimicrobial stewardship programs have a desirable effect on patients. In our experience, the program team should be led by a staff from the particular department. When human resources are limited, the sustainability, efficiency, and effectiveness of interventions are feasible only with adequate computer support. Finally, but no less important, the necessary feedback between the prescribers and the team must be based on an ad hoc method such as that provided by statistical control charts, a median chart in our study.

Outcomes of the PIRASOA programme, an antimicrobial stewardship programme implemented in hospitals of the Public Health System of Andalusia, Spain: an ecologic study of time-trend analysis

OBJECTIVES

Inappropriate antimicrobial use favours the spread of resistance, and multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDR) are currently of major concern. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) are essential for improving antibiotic use in hospitals. However, their impact on entire healthcare systems has not been thoroughly assessed. Our objective was to provide the results of an institutionally supported ASP involving 31 public hospitals in Andalusia, Spain.

METHODS

We designed an ecologic time-series study from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2017. Quarterly, data on indicators were collected prospectively, and feedback reports were provided. PIRASOA is an ongoing clinically based quality-improvement programme whose key intervention is the educational interview, regular peer-to-peer interventions between advisors and prescribers to reinforce the appropriate use of antibiotics. Seventy-two indicators were monitored to measure prescribing quality (inappropriate treatments), antimicrobial consumption (defined daily doses per 1000 occupied bed-days), incidence density of MDR per 1000 occupied bed-days and crude mortality rate associated with bloodstream infections. We used Joinpoint regression software to analyse the trends.

RESULTS

The quality of antimicrobial prescribing improved markedly, and the inappropriate treatment rate was significantly lower, with quarterly percentage change (QPC) = -3.0%, p < 0.001. Total antimicrobial consumption decreased (QPC = -0.9%, p < 0.001), specifically carbapenems, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, quinolones and antifungal agents, whereas antipseudomonal cephalosporin use increased. While the incidence of MDR showed a sustained decreasing trend (QPC = -1.8%; p 0.002), the mortality of patients with bloodstream infections remained stable (QPC = -0.2%, p 0.605).

CONCLUSIONS

To date, the PIRASOA programme has succeeded in optimizing the use of antimicrobial agents and has had a positive ecologic result on bacterial resistance at level of an entire healthcare system.

Antimicrobial stewardship in an Internal Medicine ward: effects on antibiotic consumption and on the use of carbapenems

Assessing the effects of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) implemented in a 78-bed Internal Medicine ward of an Italian mid-sized acute care hospital of 296 beds (26,820 bed days/year in 2015 and 26,653 in 2016). The ASP, implemented in May 2016, included: (a) formulation and dissemination of local guidelines on empiric antibiotic therapy; (b) educational training; and (c) restrictive control on the use of carbapenems. We included in the study all the patients who had received at least one systemic antibiotic as empiric therapy and who were discharged in two comparable time periods (Oct-Nov 2015: period 1 and Oct-Nov 2016: period 2), before and after the implementation of the ASP. Clinical data were collected to compare the two study periods. The percentage of patients treated with antibiotics was significantly lower in period 2 (272/635 = 42.8% vs 238/648 = 36.7%, - 6.1%, p < 0.01). A similar reduction was observed in terms of defined daily doses per 100 bed days (from 49.5 to 46.9; - 5.3%). In period 2, we observed a significant reduction of patients treated with carbapenems (5.7 vs 2.1%, p < 0.05). The length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality was similar in the two study periods. The implementation of an ASP in our Internal Medicine ward has been associated with a significant reduction of patients treated with antibiotics. The reduction was particularly relevant for carbapenems, antibiotics which should be used only in selected cases. These results have been obtained without increasing length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality.