1
|
De Meurechy NKG, Decoste C, Mommaerts MY. On the use of intraoperative 3D-RX C-arm imaging in orthognathic surgery: a prospective non-consecutive case series study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 28:101-109. [PMID: 36279049 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01119-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Segment and osteosynthesis malposition resulting in patients' complaints (mainly about asymmetries) are encountered in orthofacial/orthognathic surgery. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN, AND SETTING We planned to investigate the usefulness of intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging concerning positioning and fixation of bone segments and osteosynthesis in orthognathic/orthofacial surgery. We performed a prospective study of non-consecutive cases. All patients receiving a bimaxillary osteotomy, genioplasty, and their combinations were included in the study from May 2016 to May 2020. Unilateral and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies were excluded. There were no gender and age limitations. All were intraoperatively examined using the BV Pulsera 3D-RX System (Philips Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The outcome variables were the percentage of revisions of segment positioning and osteosynthesis. Predictor variables were age, gender, type of surgery, timing (pre- and post-imaging), and surgeon experience (senior vs assistant). RESULTS Forty female and twenty-two male patients were included (mean age 25.25 years ± 7.52 and 29.1 years ± 12.6 respectively). We evaluated 27 genioplasties and 34 Le Fort "type-I" osteotomies. Indications for segment repositioning and redo-osteosynthesis increased after intraoperative imaging as compared to operator's clinical judgment before intraoperative imaging (95% confidence interval; p < .001 and p = .002 respectively). CONCLUSION Suboptimal positioning and fixation of bone segments or osteosynthesis were more apparent with 3D imaging. In addition, some satisfactory cases were also revised for an optimal outcome. As a result, surgeons were prompted to more revisions than judged necessary without intraoperative imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolas K G De Meurechy
- European Face Centre, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christopher Decoste
- European Face Centre, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maurice Y Mommaerts
- European Face Centre, University Hospital Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of the Efficacy of the Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Methods in the Surgical Planning of the Maxillary All-On-4, M-4, and V-4. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:1553340. [PMID: 35937385 PMCID: PMC9348921 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1553340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study is aimed at analyzing the difference between the measurements made according to certain anatomical signs of the maxillary jaw using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to decide whether to use all-on-4, M-4, or V-4 configuration to prevent complications caused by incorrect measurements during the presurgical planning stage of the placement of implants in the all-on-4 technique. A retrospective study was conducted with 50 patients with upper edentulous jaws suitable for the all-on-4 technique, who underwent preoperative panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography evaluation for dental implant surgery. The shortest vertical distances between anatomical structures were measured. Measurements were made independently by two oral and maxillofacial surgeons, one experienced and the other inexperienced. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean values according to gender (p=0.045). When the measurements made by the experienced surgeon and the inexperienced surgeon were compared, there was no significant difference between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. In situations where bone measurements are required for deciding on all-on-4 or one of its configurations (M-4 and V-4), it was found that panoramic radiography gives significantly incorrect results compared to cone beam computed tomography (p<0.05). Cone beam computed tomography is more reliable than panoramic radiography and eliminates the margin of error in the planning of all-on-4 or its variations to be made by either an experienced or an inexperienced oral surgeon.
Collapse
|
3
|
Sheng K. Radiological investigation of acute mandibular injury. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2022; 13:165-171. [PMID: 36051802 PMCID: PMC9426694 DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_27_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This article focuses on the different imaging modalities used to evaluate acute mandibular fractures and explores important concepts relating to their diagnosis, investigation, and treatment. Significant focus will be given to exploring general management principles, considerations regarding first-line imaging, and recent technological advancement. Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred method when attempting to identify acute mandibular fractures, particularly in trauma patients, and has very high specificity and sensitivity. Multidetector CT now represents the standard of care, enabling fast scan times, reduced artifact, accurate reconstructed views, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions. Cone-beam CT is a newer advanced imaging modality that is increasingly being used worldwide, particularly in the ambulatory and intraoperative setting. It produces high-resolution images with submillimeter isotropic voxels, 3D and multiplanar reconstruction, and low radiation dose, however is less widely available and more expensive. Ultrasound is a valuable method in identifying a fracture in unstable patients, but is limited in its ability to detect nondisplaced fractures. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in determining the presence of soft-tissue injury. CT angiography is invaluable in the assessment of potential vascular injury in condylar fracture dislocations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Klatt JC, Sorowka T, Kluwe L, Smeets R, Gosau M, Hanken H. Does a preoperative cone beam CT reduce complication rates in the surgical removal of complex lower third molars? A retrospective study including 486 cases. Head Face Med 2021; 17:33. [PMID: 34389020 PMCID: PMC8364039 DOI: 10.1186/s13005-021-00271-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKROUND This study was designed to analyse the value of preoperative Cone Beam CTs (CBCT) prior to the surgical removal of complex lower third molars. Furthermore, the aim was to assess injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) bundle and postoperative neurological disorders depending on the position of the lower third molar and the inferior alveolar nerve bundle. METHODS In this retrospective examination preoperative Cone Beam CTs and Orthopantomographs (OPT) of 324 patients were analysed concerning the location of the lower third molars in relation to the mandible and the inferior alveolar nerve bundle. Surgery protocols of all patients who underwent the surgical removal of at least one complex lower third molar were analysed concerning patient data, length of surgery, intraoperative haemorrhage, intraoperative exposure of the inferior alveolar nerve bundle, postoperative swelling and postoperative neurological disorders. The data was then compared to data from international studies. RESULTS In all 324 patients a permanent neurological damage was not found. Temporary neurological damage was recorded in 13 cases (2.6%). A caudal nerve position with no measurable distance to the root of the lower third molar was associated with the highest risk of a temporal neurological damage. A vestibular touching nerve route also correlated with postoperative sensitivity impairment. If a mesioangulation (Winter) or a Pell and Gregory Type IIIC appears in the OPT, risk of neurological damage is at its highest. CONCLUSIONS Three-dimensional radiographic imaging, in our patient group, does not significantly affect the risk for complications during the surgical removal of complex lower third molars. Therefore, it should only be utilized for risk assessment, especially in cases of symptom-free lower third molars. A preoperative orthopantomogram still can be accepted as standard for radiographic imaging. An intraoperative exposure of the IAN bundle does not necessarily predict simultaneous neurological damage. Exposure of the IAN bundle is no indication for a discontinuation of the surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C Klatt
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Tony Sorowka
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lan Kluwe
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ralf Smeets
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Gosau
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Henning Hanken
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh A, Dhungel S, Kayastha P, Roychoudhury A, Jose A. Does additional intraoperative imaging improves outcomes in isolated zygomatic arch fractures: Systematic review. ADVANCES IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adoms.2021.100014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Sukegawa S, Masui M, Kanno T, Miki M, Nakamoto H, Furuki Y. Evaluation of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condyle Fracture by Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Hybrid Operating Room. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31:762-765. [PMID: 31856135 PMCID: PMC7329199 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000006101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Condylar fractures are the most common fractures of the mandible, and treatment of mandibular condylar fractures by maxillofacial surgeons is a very important procedure. However, the surgical approaches have anatomical limitations. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate the reduction achieved in open reduction and internal fixation because of the uncertainty in securing a sufficient operative field. As a potential solution, the authors evaluated the benefits of intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with high image quality performed in a hybrid operating room. Intraoperative CBCT is easy to perform in a hybrid operating room, and it is possible to quickly evaluate high-quality CT images, including 3D images. Because the state of reduction of mandibular condylar fractures also affects the prognosis of treatment, more precise reduction and fixation should improve prognoses. The use of CBCT in a hybrid operating room also avoids re-operation, and patients benefit from minimum invasive surgery. Intraoperative CBCT is a very useful strategy for evaluation of mandibular condylar fracture surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shintaro Sukegawa
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu
| | - Masanori Masui
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu
| | - Takahiro Kanno
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane
| | - Masayuki Miki
- Division of Radiological Technology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Nakamoto
- Division of Radiological Technology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Furuki
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Suchyta M, Mardini S. Innovations and Future Directions in Head and Neck Microsurgical Reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2020; 47:573-593. [PMID: 32892802 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck reconstructive microsurgery is constantly innovating because of a combination of multidisciplinary advances. This article examines recent innovations that have affected the field as well as presenting research leading to future advancement. Innovations include the use of virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing in craniofacial reconstruction, advances in intraoperative navigation and imaging, as well as postoperative monitoring, development of minimally invasive reconstructive microsurgery techniques, integration of regenerative medicine and stem cell biology with reconstruction, and the dramatic advancement of face transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Suchyta
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, MA1244W, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Samir Mardini
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, MA1244W, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Computerized Approach to Facial Transplantation: Evolution and Application in 3 Consecutive Face Transplants. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2379. [PMID: 31592022 PMCID: PMC6756666 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Face transplant (FT) candidates present with unique anatomic and functional defects unsuitable for autologous reconstruction, making the accurate design and transplantation of patient-specific allografts particularly challenging. In this case series, we present our computerized surgical planning (CSP) protocol for FT.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hooper T, Eccles G, Milliken T, Mathieu-Burry JR, Reed W. Dose reduction in CT imaging for facial bone trauma in adults: A narrative literature review. J Med Radiat Sci 2019; 66:122-132. [PMID: 30706691 PMCID: PMC6545476 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Trauma to the facial area accounts for a significant number of admissions to the emergency department. Diagnostic imaging is almost always required, and is critical in determining patient management. Multi‐detector computed tomography (MDCT) appears consistently in the literature as the gold‐standard imaging modality for facial bones, but results in a high radiation dose to the patient. This makes the application and advancement of dose reduction and dose optimisation methods vital. This narrative review presents a critical analysis of the literature concerning diagnostic imaging of facial bone trauma, with an emphasis on dose reduction methods for MDCT. Databases including Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science and Scopus were used to investigate this topic, with the key words: facial bone trauma, computed tomography (CT) imaging and dose reduction. Exclusion criteria included studies on nasal bone fracturing, dental imaging, elective surgeries and paediatric imaging. The literature shows overwhelming support for MDCT, given its accuracy, efficiency and ease of operation. Noise reducing reconstruction algorithms show promise as a successful method of dose reduction in facial bone imaging. Investigations of more innovative techniques also appear within the literature, including diagnostic cone‐beam CT (CBCT), intraoperative CBCT and dual‐source CT (DSCT), but further research is required to confirm their clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayla Hooper
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, the University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Grace Eccles
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, the University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Talia Milliken
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, the University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | | | - Warren Reed
- Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, the University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Özalp Ö, Tezerişener HA, Kocabalkan B, Büyükkaplan UŞ, Özarslan MM, Şimşek Kaya G, Altay MA, Sindel A. Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study. Imaging Sci Dent 2019; 48:269-275. [PMID: 30607351 PMCID: PMC6305775 DOI: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between measurements made using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based on certain anatomical landmarks of the jaws, with the goal of preventing complications due to inaccurate measurements in the pre-surgical planning phase of dental implant placement. Materials and Methods A total of 56 individuals who underwent panoramic radiography and a CBCT evaluation before dental implant surgery were enrolled in the study. Measurements were performed to identify the shortest vertical distance between the alveolar crest and neighboring anatomical structures, including the maxillary sinus, nasal floor, mandibular canal, and foramen mentale. The differences between the measurements on panoramic radiography and CBCT images were statistically analyzed. Results Statistically significant differences were observed between the measurements on panoramic radiography and CBCT for all anatomical structures (P<.05). The correlation coefficients (r) between the paired samples obtained from panoramic radiography and CBCT were closely correlated (P<.05), with r values varying from 0.921 and 0.979 for different anatomical regions. Conclusion The results of this study support the idea that panoramic radiography might provide sufficient information on bone height for preoperative implant planning in routine cases or when CBCT is unavailable. However, an additional CBCT evaluation might be helpful in cases where a safety margin cannot be respected due to insufficient bone height.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Öznur Özalp
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | | | - Burak Kocabalkan
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | | | | | - Göksel Şimşek Kaya
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Altay
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Alper Sindel
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dreizin D, Nam AJ, Tirada N, Levin MD, Stein DM, Bodanapally UK, Mirvis SE, Munera F. Multidetector CT of Mandibular Fractures, Reductions, and Complications: A Clinically Relevant Primer for the Radiologist. Radiographics 2017; 36:1539-64. [PMID: 27618328 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
After the nasal bones, the mandible is the second most common site of facial fractures, and mandibular fractures frequently require open reduction. In the trauma injury setting, multidetector computed tomography (CT) has become the cornerstone imaging modality for determining the most appropriate treatment management, fixation method, and surgical approach. Multidetector CT is also used to assess the adequacy of the reduction and evaluate potential complications in the postoperative period. For successful restoration of the mandible's form and function, as well as management of posttraumatic and postoperative complications, reconstructive surgeons are required to have a detailed understanding of mandibular biomechanics, occlusion, and anatomy. To provide added value in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up of mandibular fractures, radiologists should be aware of these concepts. Knowledge of the techniques commonly used to achieve occlusal and anatomic reduction and of the rationale behind the range of available treatment options for different injury patterns-from isolated and nondisplaced fractures to multisite and comminuted fractures-also is essential. This article focuses on the use of multidetector CT for pre- and postoperative evaluation of mandibular fractures and outlines fundamental concepts of diagnosis and management-beginning with an explanation of common fracture patterns and their biomechanical underpinnings, and followed by a review of the common postoperative appearances of these fractures after semirigid and rigid fixation procedures. Specific considerations regarding fractures in different regions of the tooth-bearing and non-tooth-bearing mandible and the unique issues pertaining to the edentulous atrophic mandible are reviewed, and key features that distinguish major from minor complications are described. (©)RSNA, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dreizin
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Arthur J Nam
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Nikki Tirada
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Martin D Levin
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Deborah M Stein
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Uttam K Bodanapally
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Stuart E Mirvis
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| | - Felipe Munera
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (D.D., U.K.B., S.E.M.), Division of Plastic Surgery (A.J.N.), and Department of Surgery (D.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; Department of Radiology, The George Washington Hospital, Washington, DC (N.T.); School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (M.D.L.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Miami Leonard Miller School of Medicine and Jackson Memorial Hospital & Ryder Trauma Center, Miami, Fla (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Suchyta M, Mardini S. Innovations and Future Directions in Head and Neck Microsurgical Reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2017; 44:325-344. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2016.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
13
|
Bhatti N, Kanzaria A, Huxham-Owen N, Bridle C, Holmes S. Management of complex orbital fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 54:719-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
14
|
Thönissen P, Ermer M, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R, Metzger M, Bittermann G. Sensitivity and specificity of cone beam computed tomography in thin bony structures in maxillofacial surgery – A clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 43:1284-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Revised: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
|
15
|
Liu W, Tang XJ, Zhang ZY, Yin L, Gui L. 3D-CT evaluation of mandibular morphology after mandibular outer cortex osteotomy in young miniature pigs: the role of the periosteum. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013; 42:763-71. [PMID: 24418019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2013] [Revised: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 11/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of periosteum on the healing and growth of mandible after mandibular outer cortex osteotomy using three-dimensional computed tomography. METHODS Eighteen 3-month-old miniature pigs were randomized into three groups. The mandibular outer cortex osteotomy was performed on both sides in group I, and on the left side in group II. In groups I and II, the local periosteum on the left side was resected. In group III, no operation was performed. The evaluation of mandibular morphology of all the animals was performed based on multiple spiral CT data before and after surgery. RESULTS The bone defects healed well when the periosteum was preserved, whereas they healed poorly with residual bone defects when the periosteum was resected after surgery. When the periosteum was resected, the decrease in the mean thickness of the mandibular body was more than that of the contralateral side after surgery. In group I, about 66.7% of the animals exhibited mandible deviation at 24 weeks after surgery. The median point of mentum was inclined toward the side that the periosteum was preserved. In groups II and III, no mandible deviation was observed. CONCLUSION The periosteum plays an important role in bone growth and fracture healing. Mandibular outer cortex osteotomy inhibited the mandibular development and resulted in postoperative mandibular deviation in young miniature pigs. The simultaneous periosteum resection may offset the phenomenon of mandibular deviation to a certain extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Tang
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Zhang
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, China
| | - Lin Yin
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, China
| | - Lai Gui
- Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Ba-Da-Chu Road, Shi Jing Shan District, Beijing 100144, China.
| |
Collapse
|