Radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Higher-dose cisplatin every 3 weeks versus cisplatin/5-fluorouracil every 4 weeks

Raltitrexed versus 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open labeled, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical trial

Background

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of raltitrexed (Saiweijian^®) plus cisplatin (SP regimen) and 5‐fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP regimen) as concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA‐NPC).

Methods

Eligible patients (N = 135) were allocated randomly in a ratio of 1:1 to receive CCRT with either SP or FP. At least 2 cycles of chemotherapy was administrated during radiotherapy. Progression free survival (PFS) was primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), loco‐regional relapse free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and toxicity.

Results

In this study, 68 patients received SP as CCRT, and 67 received FP. Objective responses were noted in 97.1% of the patients in the SP group and in 97.0% of the patients in the FP group (P = 1.00). At the end of a median 36 months follow‐up period, the estimated 3‐year PFS rates were 70.1% for SP and 66.6% for FP, respectively. The 3‐year LRRFS, DMFS and OS rates were 88.9%, 74.7% and 84.0%, respectively, for the SP group, and 92.3%, 71.0% and 73.7%, respectively, for the FP group. Overall, there was no difference between treatment groups with regard to response or survival. The most frequent acute toxicities monitored in both groups were bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal side effects and oral mucositis (OM). The overall incidence of grade 3‐4 OM in the FP group (47.8%) was higher than in the SP group (11.8%). However, the incidence of other adverse effects observed in both groups was similar (P > .05).

Conclusions

These data indicate that SP and FP therapies have similar efficacy in treating LA‐NPC. The SP regimen showed a tolerable safety profile along with a lower frequency of severe OM and therefore, an improved life quality. In conclusion, SP was a well tolerated, effective, regimen for LA‐NPC treatment.

Comparison cisplatin with cisplatin plus 5FU in head and neck cancer patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the treatment outcomes and toxicity of both cisplatin and cisplatin plus 5FU chemotherapy in head and neck cancer patients who have received surgery, in addition to postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From May 1991 to December 2012, a total of 113 head and neck cancer patients who received surgery, along with postoperative chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. The primary sites were oral cavity (86), oropharynx (17), hypopharynx (4), and larynx (6). Thirty-nine patients received cisplatin (P), while 74 patients received cisplatin plus 5FU (PF). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).

RESULTS

The median follow up time was 43months, with a range of 4-222months. The 3-year rates of OS, LFFS, and DMFS were 62.1%, 71.3%, and 82.4%, respectively. The 3-year OS for P and PF were 71.3% and 57.5% (p=0.27). A multivariate analysis revealed that various chemotherapy regimens displayed no statistical difference for OS (Hazard Ratio [HR]=1.81; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=0.963-3.408; p=0.065), LFFS (HR=0.98; 95% CI=0.458-2.127; p=0.973), and DMFS (HR=1.25; 95% CI=0.463-3.398; p=0.656). Grade 3 and 4 mucositis for P and PF group were 61.5% and 64.9%. A greater than grade 3 dermatitis for P and PF group were 7.7% and 14.9%.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin alone appeared to have higher 3-year OS and lower severe mucositis and dermatitis than cisplatin plus 5FU.