Early secondary bone grafting in children with alveolar cleft does not modify the risk of maxillary permanent canine impaction at the age of 10 years

Gingivoperiosteoplasty in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: The Need for Alveolar Bone Grafting

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) in preventing alveolar bone grafting (ABG) among children with cleft lip and palate (CLP).

DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective university hospital single center study.

PATIENTS

Children with CLP treated with GPP from 2000-2015 were included. Those under eight years of age, without definitive conclusions regarding need for ABG or with incomplete data were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Included patients were analyzed for demographics, cleft type, age at GPP, associated cleft surgery, use of nasoalveolar molding (NAM), indication for ABG, operating surgeon and presence of residual alveolar fistula. T-tests and Fisher's exact tests were utilized for statistical analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The need for ABG.

RESULTS

Of the 1682 children identified with CLP, 64 underwent GPP and met inclusion criteria. 78% of patients with CLP who underwent GPP were recommended for ABG. Those who received GPP at a younger age (P = .004) and at the time of initial cleft lip repair (P = .022) were less likely to be recommended for ABG. Patients with complete CLP were more likely to be recommended for ABG than patients with cleft lip and alveolus only (P = .015). The operating surgeon impacted the likelihood of ABG (P = .004). Patient gender, race, ethnicity, laterality, and NAM were not significantly associated with recommendation for ABG.

CONCLUSION

GPP does not preclude the need for ABG. Therefore, the success of ABG after GPP and maxillary growth restriction should be analyzed further to determine if GPP is a worthwhile adjunct to ABG in cleft care.

Factors Contributing to Canine Impaction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Undergoing Alveolar Bone Grafts

BACKGROUND

Patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) undergo alveolar bone grafting (ABG) to unite the bony segments before eruption of the maxillary permanent canine.

PURPOSE

This study assessed the frequency of canine impaction after ABG in the UCLP patient population and identified associated demographic, anatomical, and operative factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

This retrospective cohort study included 257 patients with UCLP who received ABG surgery at a single craniofacial center.

PREDICTOR VARIABLES

The variables were cleft characteristics, pre-ABG procedures, operative factors, and dental anomalies identified through electronic health records, radiographs, and intraoral photographs taken before ABG and at least 2 years after ABG.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

The primary outcome variable was the presence of an impacted maxillary canine, defined as malposition of a fully developed canine following ABG with full eruption of the contralateral canine.

ANALYSES

The t tests, χ2 tests, and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate frequency of canine impaction and test for associations with the predictor variables.

RESULTS

Of 257 patients, 56% were male with a mean age of 9.2 years at the time of ABG. The frequency of canine impaction was 27% (n = 69, 95% confidence interval 22 to 33%). Significant associations were found for: complete clefts (30 vs 12%, P = .017), hypodivergent facial patterns (low angle: 46%; high angle: 29 vs 22% normal angle, P = .042), females (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.1, P = .015), early grafting with less than 1/3 developed canine root (aOR = 3.36, P = .024), pregraft extraction of primary canine (aOR = 2.3, P = .009) and greater permanent canine angulation (odds ratio = 1.1, P < .0001). No significant associations with pregraft orthodontic expansion or regrafting were detected.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In this study, about one in four patients with UCLP had an impacted canine. Multiple factors including pregraft extraction of the primary canine and increased canine angulation were associated with impaction of the permanent canine.

Observing the Eruption of Canine After Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

PURPOSE

Alveolar bone grafting is undertaken to provide stability to the dental arch and facilitate the eruption of permanent canine as teeth in the line of cleft usually have an altered pattern of eruption. The purpose of this study was to assess the eruption status and the change in the position and pattern of canine eruption after secondary alveolar bone grafting.

METHODS

An ambispective cohort study was conducted in patients operated for alveolar bone grafting with unilateral/bilateral alveolar cleft between the age of 9 to 13 years using autogenous iliac crest bone graft. The predictor variables of interest include the preoperative eruption status of canine (completely erupted/partially erupted/unerupted), stage of root development (one-third/two-third/more than two-third/complete) and position (vertical/lateral/buccopalatal) of the canine. The primary outcome variable is the eruption status of the canine (completely erupted/partially erupted/unerupted) at 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome variables include the stage of root development, change in the vertical, lateral and buccopalatal position of the canine observed in the first 6 months postoperatively with follow-up at 1 and 3 months. Another secondary outcome variable was the status of bone graft at 6 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was done using Spearman's rank correlation and ANOVA chi-square test.

RESULT

The study sample consisted of 30 non-syndromic alveolar cleft patients with a mean age of 11.9 years, out of which partial and complete eruption of canine was seen in 43.33 and 36.67%, respectively. The canine was unerupted in 20% of the cases (P = .001). There was evidence of continued root development through the grafted bone. No significant change in the angulation of canine was observed in the postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Significant change in the eruption status and root development of canine with no statistically significant change in the vertical and lateral angulation during eruption was observed. Identifying these risk factors by continuous postoperative monitoring will help in identifying the malposition at an early stage.

Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate

The aim of the study was to assess the risk of incidence of additional congenital dental anomalies in children with nonsyndromic cleft lip, alveolar and/without palate (CL/P). Hypodontia, hyperdontia and canines impaction was recognized. From patients with CL/P treated at the Clinic of Congenital Facial Deformities in Chair and Department of Jaw Orthopedics Medical University of Lublin, 56 subjects were randomly selected. On the panoramic radiographs taken at the age of 8-12 years, the angle of upper unerupted canines was measured using Westerlund's recommendations. The supernumerary teeth and hypodontia were checked. The procedures: maxillary expansion, secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) and extraction of primary canines were noted. The frequency of canines impaction was 5.36%. Hypodontia was found in 37.5% of patients; hyperdontia was present in 23.21% of patients. No influence of procedures (expansion of the maxilla, SABG, deciduous canines extraction) on permanent maxillary canine eruption was proved. Patients with CL/P are exposed to the unfavorable position of unerupted maxillary canines most frequently in the cleft area of complete cleft. Maxillary lateral incisor on the cleft side is most frequently affected with congenital anomaly. Hypodontia and hyperdontia do not influence maxillary canine impaction. Good clinical result was achieved with an applied approach, which should be widely introduced.

Comparison of dental outcomes in patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who receive secondary alveolar bone grafting before or after emergence of the permanent maxillary canine

INTRODUCTION

For patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP), secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) can be performed before or after the emergence of the cleft side permanent canine (pre-CE and post-CE, respectively). The controversy regarding dental outcomes related to the timing of SABG remains unsettled. The objective of this study was to evaluate dental survival and specific dental outcomes of cleft-adjacent teeth in children with CUCLP who received either pre-CE or post-CE SABG.

METHODS

The permanent maxillary canines and the central and lateral incisors of 21 pre-CE and 23 post-CE SABG subjects with nonsyndromic CUCLP and all cleft-related surgeries performed by the same surgeon were analyzed retrospectively. Intraoral radiographs and clinical chart notes were collected at age 7 years, at the time of the SABG, and approximately 4 years after the grafting. Dental survival, spontaneous canine eruption, planned prosthetic replacement, root development, and root resorption were analyzed.

RESULTS

Dental outcomes on the noncleft side were better than those on the cleft side. On the cleft side, dental survival of the cleft-adjacent teeth was not significantly different between the pre-CE and post-CE SABG groups (P >0.05). Most teeth completed root development after grafting, and the cleft side canine root development in the pre-CE SABG group appeared to accelerate after SABG. Trends showed that the pre-CE SABG group suffered less root resorption (16.28%; post-CE: 22.73%; P >0.05) and received fewer planned prosthetic replacements (14.29%; post-CE: 26.01%; P >0.05) but required a greater number of canine exposures (33.33%; post-CE: 4.55%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-CE SABG showed better dental outcomes in patients with CUCLP, with fewer adverse dental outcomes than post-CE SABG.

Predictive factors for canine position in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

OBJECTIVES

The aims were to compare cleft and non-cleft canine position, to find predictive factors for canine position and to assess surgically exposed canines.

MATERIALS/METHODS

One hundred forty-eight individuals, born 1978-2005, with total unilateral cleft lip and palate (including Simonart's band <5 mm) treated in Gothenburg, were included. Canine angulation as well as vertical and horizontal position were assessed on panoramic radiographs (PAN) taken at the age of 10. Plausible predictive factors were registered from PAN, cast models and medical records. Data on spontaneous eruption or surgical exposure were available for 88 patients. Cleft- and non-cleft side was compared using paired t-test and Fisher's exact test. Multiple stepwise regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to detect possible predictors for cleft canine position.

RESULTS

The cleft canine angulation was 29.3 ± 13.1 degrees (mean ± standard deviation) versus 7.6 ± 8.2 degrees on the non-cleft side (p < 0.001). Cleft canines were higher positioned and located closer to the midline compared to non-cleft canines (p < 0.001). Age for both hard palate closure and bone grafting, cleft lateral agenesis as well as transposition were associated with canine position. Cleft canines that required surgical exposure (28%) had an increased angulation and were higher positioned than spontaneously erupted canines (p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

The shortcomings were the retrospective design and incomplete assessment of the buccal-palatal canine position on 2D images.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

With increased age for bone grafting, decreased age for hard palate closure and transposition, an association with abnormal canine position was found. A rigorous monitoring of cleft canine eruption is, therefore, advocated.

Impacted maxillary canine in unilateral cleft lip and palate: A literature review

Background

The incidence of canine impaction in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) is increasing and in most cases is a part of a syndrome. The provision of different treatment modalities in these patients is a challenging and daunting task.

Objective

The objective of the present review was to scrutinize the available evidence on canine impaction in UCLP patients.

Materials and methods

Using PRISMA guidelines, a review was conducted via the PubMed (MEDLINE), ISI Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, and Embase databases using different keywords. Studies were shortlisted and inspected according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) papers published in English over the past 40 years, (2) study participants with maxillary canine impaction in unilateral cleft lip and palate, (3) studies reporting on canine impaction and cleft lip and palate, and (4) no age limit was applied so studies published on both children and adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate and canine impaction were included. Studies which justified inclusion criteria were included whereas the rest of the studies were removed.

Results

A total of 279 studies were retrieved using the search strategy. After removing duplicate reports and scrutinizing those based on title and abstract, 54 studies were shortlisted for full text review. Following the review, 22 studies were included in the final list. The presentation of data was based on the year of study, type of cleft, gender, age of bone graft, spontaneous eruption, and surgical exposure.

Conclusion

Every UCLP patient is different and treatment modalities should vary according to the characteristics, subjective response, and variability of the malformation.

Optimal Timing of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting: A Literature Review

PURPOSE

Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) during mixed dentition is the standard of care for alveolar clefts. However, early SABG at 4 to 7 years of age before the eruption of lateral incisors versus late SABG at 8 to 12 years of age before the eruption of maxillary permanent canines is still debated. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the outcomes of early SABG in residual bone volume or degree of bone resorption, maxillary canine movement or impaction rate, complications, and esthetic outcomes and to compare outcomes of early versus late SABG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Keywords for alveolar cleft repair and inclusion criteria were used to screen articles for final review.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 6,278 articles, of which 4 retrospective and 4 prospective studies were chosen for final review. Of these, 7 studies compared outcome variables between early and late SABG and 1 looked at bone formation of patients who underwent only early SABG. For outcome variables, 3 studies assessed bone volume with radiographic evaluation, 2 estimated maxillary permanent canine impaction rate, 1 evaluated surgical complications, operative time, and length of hospital stay, and 1 looked at anterior incisor crown length. Overall, 6 studies concluded that early SABG provides a better outcome than late SABG and 2 found comparable results across the aforementioned variables.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that the existing data support the concept of early SABG; however, the data are not sufficient for a definitive conclusion. A well-planned prospective study is needed to further investigate the rationale for early SABG.

The maxillary lateral incisor in the rehabilitation of cleft lip and palate

Objective

This study analyzed the maintenance of lateral incisors in the dental rehabilitation of individuals with cleft lip and palate.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted on a tertiary craniofacial center and comprised retrospective analysis of panoramic and periapical radiographs of Caucasoid individuals with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, analyzing all radiographs available on the records of each individual, from the first to the last up to 12 years of age. Overall, 2,826 records were reviewed to achieve a sample of 1,000 individuals. Among these, 487 individuals presented the permanent lateral incisors on both cleft and non-cleft sides, which were included in this study.

Results

The results were evaluated in percentages and by descriptive statistics. The association between maintenance of the lateral incisor and timing of alveolar bone graft were analyzed by the t test. Among the 487 individuals, 265 had not completed treatment, 62 presented insufficient information, and 44 concluded the treatment elsewhere. Among the remaining 116 individuals, the lateral incisor was extracted from 88 (75.86%) of them on the cleft side (CS) and from 23 (19.83%) people on the non-cleft side (NCS). The age at accomplishment of alveolar bone graft was significantly associated with maintenance of the lateral incisor on the cleft side (p<0.01). Most extractions were indicated because of the inadequate positioning on the CS and for midline correction on the NCS. Rehabilitation was primarily completed by orthodontic movement (53 individuals on the CS and 13 individuals on the NCS).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the lateral incisor on the cleft side was not maintained in most individuals. Positive relationship was observed between extraction of the lateral incisor and age at accomplishment of the alveolar bone graft, suggesting the need to anticipate the initial radiographic evaluation to enhance its maintenance and reduce the procedures required for rehabilitation.