Lateral sinus floor elevation without grafting materials. Individual- and aggregate-data meta-analysis

Biomechanical Basis for Bone Healing and Osseointegration of Implants in Sinus Grafts

A thorough comprehension of the mechanisms controlling new bone formation and implant osseointegration after maxillary sinus floor elevation is crucial for aligning our treatment choices with biological principles and enhancing clinical outcomes. The goal of bone regeneration in sinus lift procedures is to provide a sufficient amount of newly-formed tissue to support implant osseointegration. However, it is still unclear whether there is a minimum quantity of vital bone within the newly-formed tissue required for effective support, though it is generally assumed that vital bone is essential for this process. The source and integration of new bone in maxillary sinus floor elevation procedures remain debated. Most clinical studies suggest a paramount role for sinus floor and bony walls, with a centripetal pattern of new bone formation, while conflicting reports exist regarding the osteogenic role of the Schneiderian membrane. The influence of mechanical input on peri-implant bone formation, mineralization, and maturation is significant, with bone remodeling regulated by mechanical strains generated during loading. Defining optimal loading for implants, particularly in sinus lift procedures, is challenging, as early loading may damage interfacial tissue, interfering with osteogenesis. Differences in osseointegration dynamics between native and augmented bone may arise from biological and mechanical factors, but also from patient-specific factors which should be evaluated in treatment planning. Factors to consider include sinus anatomy, patient and site-specific regenerative potential, and the selection of graft material that matches the osteogenic and mechanical requirements. Tailored approaches integrating patient-specific considerations and refined implant strategies will enhance predictability and longevity of treatment.

Comprehensive sinus contour classification and its characteristics from radiographic examination: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to propose a comprehensive maxillary sinus (MS) contour classification system based on the evaluation of anatomical characteristics from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examination and investigate the relationship between sinus contours and sinus floor elevation (SFE).

METHODS

A total of 283 CBCT scans from patients who had single tooth loss in the posterior maxilla and underwent SFE were analyzed. The MS was classified at each tooth position. For buccal-palatal evaluation, the classification from Type A to E was narrow-taper, taper, ovoid, square, and irregular, respectively. For mesial-distal evaluation, the classification from Type 1 to 4 was flat, slope, concave, and septa, respectively. The major anatomical parameters evaluated were (1) residual bone height (RBH), (2) sinus width (SW), (3) maxillary sinus angle (MSA), (4) buccal dip angle (BDA), (5) palatonasal recess (PNR), and (6) sinus depth.

RESULTS

Eleven groups of MS contour were classified after detailed calculation. Differences in the RBH, MSA, BDA, and SW among different groups were statistically significant. The narrow-taper and slope MS (A2) group had the highest RBH (8.66 ± 0.77 mm), largest BDA (79.9° ± 3.18°), smallest MSA (19.8° ± 2.01°), and narrowest SW (6.30 ± 1.23 mm). The lowest RBH was in the square and concave sinus (D3) group (5.11 ± 2.70 mm). The ovoid and concave sinus (C3) group had the smallest BDA (50.64 ± 8.73 mm) and largest MSA (74.11° ± 11.52°). The square and flat MS (D1) group had the widest SW (19.13 ± 3.69 mm). A strongly significant positive correlation was observed between the SW and MSA (r = 0.67) and a strongly negative correlation between the SW and BDA (r = - 0.65). The prevalence of PNR (mean angle: 104.06° ± 16.83°, mean height: 14.72 ± 11.78 mm) was 38% and frequently observed in the ovoid and slope MS (C2) group.

CONCLUSION

Despite certain characteristics at different tooth sites, the same tooth position was categorized differently using different classification systems, indicating large anatomical variations in the MS. The classification system proposed herein allows for classification based on general characteristics at a single tooth site, aiming to help surgeons in improving presurgical evaluation.

Biomechanical analysis of the maxillary sinus floor membrane during internal sinus floor elevation with implants at different angles of the maxillary sinus angles

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed and compared the biomechanical properties of maxillary sinus floor mucosa with implants at three different maxillary sinus angles during a modified internal sinus floor elevation procedure.

METHODS

3D reconstruction of the implant, maxillary sinus bone, and membrane were performed. The maxillary sinus model was set at three different angles. Two internal maxillary sinus elevation models were established, and finite element analysis was used to simulate the modified maxillary sinus elevation process. The implant was elevated to 10 mm at three maxillary sinus angles when the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 and 4 mm. The stress of the maxillary sinus floor membrane was analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

When the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 0 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the peak stress values of the implant on the maxillary sinus floor membrane at three different angles were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 5.14-78.32 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 2.81-73.89 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 2.82-51.87 MPa. When the maxillary sinus floor membrane was separated by 4 mm and elevated to 10 mm, the corresponding values were as follows: maxillary sinus I: 0.50-7.25 MPa; maxillary sinus II: 0.81-16.55 MPa; and maxillary sinus III: 0.49-22.74 MPa.

CONCLUSION

The risk of sinus floor membrane rupture is greatly reduced after adequate dissection of the maxillary sinus floor membrane when performing modified internal sinus elevation in a narrow maxillary sinus. In a wide maxillary sinus, the risk of rupture or perforation of the wider maxillary sinus floor is reduced, regardless of whether traditional or modified internal sinus elevation is performed at the same height.

A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to introduce a graftless sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement in the alveolus of the posterior maxilla and compare this approach's outcomes in freshly extracted sockets versus healed sockets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 60 patients aged between 27 and 59 years old, requiring dental implants in the posterior maxilla, and diagnosed with reduced vertical bone height (30 with freshly extracted sockets (group A) and the remaining 30 with healed sockets (group B). Before the sinus lifting approach, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken, followed by another CBCT at least one-year post-sinus lifting (range: 12-36 months). Biological and mechanical complications were assessed, and the primary implant stability was measured using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). Parametric data were analyzed using an independent t-test for intergroup comparisons, with significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among groups concerning gender, placement side, and follow-up. All dental implants demonstrated high survival rates with no observed biological or mechanical complications. Moreover, the primary implant stability was satisfactory, and there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.38). In terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both groups exhibited satisfactory and successful outcomes, with increased new bone formation in group A. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.26). Regarding the vertical sinus floor elevation without new bone formation, group B showed (0.11 ± 0.64) mm of intrasinus implant height without bone formation, while group A showed an increment of bone formation above the intrasinus implant (0.22 ± 0.33) mm, with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

Our approach proves to be predictable, low-cost, and efficient option for sinus lift procedures, demonstrating high survival rates with acceptable primary implant stability. Moreover, it yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both in freshly extracted and healed sockets. Consequently, our approach holds promise as a reliable procedure for sinus lifting with simultaneous dental implant placement.

Radiological Evaluation and Biomechanical Stability of Implants Simultaneously Placed at the Sites with Sole Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin (A-PRF) Grafted Sinus Floor

Introduction

In this retrospective study stabilities of 24 implants simultaneously placed at posterior maxillae with sinuses grafted by advanced platelet rich fibrin (A-PRF) and newly formed bone around them were evaluated.

Patient and Methods

Fourteen augmented maxillary sinuses of 11 patients with a mean residual alveolar bone height of 4.55 mm were involved in this study. Maxillary sinus lifting via lateral window approach and implant site osteotomy were performed, and prepared A-PRF clots were used as sole graft material. Each of the implants was immediately placed with a good primary stability. Postoperative sixth month tomography images were compared with preoperative ones in order to calculate the gained bone height and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded.

Results

The new vertical mean bone height of 24 implant sites was 12.21 mm with an implant survival rate of 100%. ISQ values of the implants were ranging from 62 to 75 with a mean value of 68. Statistically the diameter of implant did not have any effect on new bone formation and the ISQ values, however the length of them did.

Conclusion

A-PRF as a graft material for sinus lifting with simultaneous implant placement is a reliable technique with its low cost and lack of immunogenic reaction risk.

Crestal sinus augmentation in a head back position: Retrospective case series

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Crestal Sinus Augmentation (CSA) in a head back position (CSA-HBP) for maxillary sinus mucosa elevation.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 209 patients, 246 maxillary sinuses, 348 sites in this study. Complications, maxillary sinus mucosal perforation rate and cumulative survival rate (CSR) data were collected to evaluate the clinical efficacy of CSA-HBP. Maxillary sinus mucosal elevation height (EH) and new bone height (NH) were measured by cone-beam computerized tomography and standard periapical radiographs. The implantation sites of residual bone height (RBH) ≤5 mm and RBH >5 mm were marked as Groups A (n = 81) and B (n = 267), respectively. The implantation sites of the second and third molar sites were marked as Group C (n = 134), and the remaining sites were marked as Group D (n = 214).

Results

The RBH before implant placement was 6.63 ± 2.10 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.41- 6.85 mm). The mucosal EH was 4.04 ± 1.86 mm (95% CI 3.85 - 4.24 mm). The NH was 2.36 ± 1.20 mm (95% CI 3.85-4.24 mm). No other complications were found except three cases of postoperative swelling and one case of nasal blood secretions. The overall mucosal perforation rate was 1.44% (5/348, 95% CI 0.2%-2.7%) and the rate of RBH ≤ 5 mm (Group A) was 1.49% (2/134, 95% CI 0%-3.50%). The 8-year CSR was 99.71% (347/348, 95% CI 99.2%-100.0%). Mucosal EH and NH were higher in RBH ≤5 mm (Group A) than in RBH >5 mm (Group B) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). There were no significant differences in mucosal EH and perforation rate between second and third molar sites (Group C) and other sites (Group D) (P = 0.77, Mann-Whitney U-test, and P = 0.16, Yates' Chi-square independence test).

Conclusions

CSA-HBP is a minimally invasive and reliable technique.

Modified Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Technique for Multiple Edentulous Spaces: A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: We aimed to demonstrate our modified osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) technique for placing two implants in multiple maxillary posterior edentulous spaces with residual bone height (RBH) < 5 mm, to evaluate the clinical effect and explore the prognosis. Methods: We identified 18 appropriate patients with RBH < 5 mm and 12 patients with RBH ≥ 5 mm. After drill preparation, variously shaped curettes were applied to adequately release the tension of the membrane around the cavity and between two implants by blunt dissection. Then, an osteotome was used to elevate the membrane to the desired height. After filling bone graft into the elevated space, dental implants were inserted. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) was performed after surgery and 6 months later. Results: The implant survival rate was 100%, and after the 6-month resorption, the height of the graft apically between the two implants gradually stabilized at 8.92 mm. Compared with 12 patients with RBH ≥ 5 mm, their graft bone resorption demonstrated no significant difference. Conclusions: It can be suggested that the modified OSFE technique could yield predictable clinical results for placing adjacent implants in patients with RBH less than 5 mm after six months of follow-up. Clinical Significance: Our modified OSFE technique could be applied to place adjacent implants in patients with RBH less than 5 mm, especially for elderly patients or patients with bone crests and vessels on the lateral wall, owing to its advantages including less trauma and fewer complications, minimizing the risk of membrane perforation, shortening the treatment period, avoiding another surgery area or second-stage surgery, improving not only the bone around the implant apex but also between implants, etc.

Non-grafted versus grafted sinus lift procedures for implantation in the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to critically evaluate the currently existing clinical evidence on the efficacy of graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation for implantation in the atrophic posterior maxilla. A search protocol without limitations to November 2020 was followed by two independent researchers. Randomized controlled trials using the lateral window approach for graftless sinus membrane elevation were included. Uncontrolled, retrospective, non-comparative studies, case reports, and experimental studies in animals or cadavers were excluded. The search identified 2777 studies. Critical selection by two independent researchers then led to the inclusion of a total of nine studies. A risk of bias assessment was applied using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. A meta-analysis was conducted for seven studies. Results showed a high overall implant survival rate in both the graftless and bone-grafted sinus lift groups (97.92% and 98.73%, respectively). The graftless sinus lift group showed a significantly lower vertical bone height gain, with a mean difference of -1.73mm (P=0.01), and a significantly lower bone density, with a mean difference of -94.7 HU (P<0.001). The implant stability quotient values did not differ significantly between the test and control groups (P=0.07).

A New Approach for Lateral Sinus Floor Elevation

The lateral sinus lift procedure has been extensively investigated and described as a reliable surgical solution aimed at facilitating implant placement and rehabilitation when the posterior upper maxilla is atrophic. The standard technique consists in a lateral antrostomy, the careful raising of the sinus membrane, and following apposition of a bone substitute between the membrane and the sinus floor. The present technical note illustrates a new conservative technique enabling lateral sinus lift without the use of bone substitutes and with predictable outcomes.

Indirect Sinus Floor Elevation Technique with Simultaneous Implant Placement without Using Bone Grafts

Context:

Maxillary posterior region is a problem area for the placement of implants. The advanced resorption of alveolar bone is combined with an increase in pneumatization of maxillary sinus because of higher intra-antral pressure, giving rise to severely atrophied alveolar ridges with reduced bone height.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 26 implants were placed in 21 patients using indirect sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement without using bone grafts. Intra-oral periapical radiographs were taken to determine residual bone height, endosinus bone (ESB), and crestal bone level.

Results:

All the implants were clinically and radiographically stable at the end of 6 months follow-up. All the implants showed ESB gain, with mean being 1.97 mm and 1.99 mm on mesial and distal sides, respectively.

Conclusion:

The findings of this study indicate that successful osseointegration is predictable using osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone graft. Spontaneous new bone formation seemed to be expected with implants placed using indirect sinus lift.