Effect of increased groundwater viscosity on the remedial performance of surfactant-enhanced air sparging

Enhanced air sparging for groundwater remediation using alginate gel-based removable hydraulic barriers

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a removable physical barrier on the air sparging performance using a lab-scale aquifer model was investigated. The barrier was installed in water-saturated porous media, prior to the air sparging, by injecting calcium chloride aqueous solution into the aquifer with pre-applied alginate solution. Changes in the air flow direction and air flux at the media surface during air sparging were evaluated. With a hydrogel barrier set at the center of the media, the airflow detoured the barrier resulting in a bimodal air flux distribution at the media surface. While employing two gel-formed barriers positioned away from the media's center, the airflow concentrated specifically on the gap between the barriers. The hydrogel was successfully removed using a sodium bicarbonate solution (1.0 mol/L). Using the hydrogel barrier, the performance of air sparging was significantly enhanced for removing contaminants [tetrachloroethene (PCE) and n-hexane mixture] due to increased air flux; 9.8% of PCE applied (7.8 g) was removed during 120 min air sprging for the gel barrier system whereas no PCE was removed for the control. Alginate gel did not show significant sorption capacity for PCE. It was stable in the contaminant up to 68 days with reasonable loss of its mass. Findings of this study present a promising option for air sparging process specifically targeting the contaminant source zone in the aquifer.

Remediation characteristics of surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) technology on volatile organic compounds contaminated soil with low permeability

Surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) is an effective technology for the remediation of volatile organic compounds contamination of medium and high-permeability soil, though applying SEAS to low-permeability soil contamination has rarely been explored. In this study, a series of two-dimensional physical model tests were designed to explore the feasibility and remediation characteristics of SEAS on low-permeability soil. In the test results, the incorporation and increase in surfactant concentration promoted air channel formation in the low-permeability soil, finally reduced the capillary breakthrough pressure and improved the airflow rate. The majority of the exhausted gaseous contaminants were distributed along the horizontal direction, differing from the results observed in medium and high-permeability soils. The exhausted gaseous contaminant concentration changed slightly when the sparging pressure and surfactant concentration increased at relatively low levels and increased as the sparging pressure and surfactant concentration increased further. Increasing the air sparging pressure without surfactant incorporation or with a low surfactant concentration cannot effectively remove the contaminant, while the removal efficiency can be enhanced with further increases in surfactant concentration. The discrete remediation characteristics had been confirmed during SEAS application on low-permeability soil, then the relationships between the ratios of remediation area and remediation extent under different surfactant concentrations and sparging pressures were established for remediation efficiency evaluation. Using this method, the discrete remediation characteristics can be recreated once the surfactant concentration and the sparging pressure were chosen. On the other side, targeted improvements in the remediation area or extent can be achieved by controlling the surfactant concentration and sparging pressure. Through this study, SEAS technology and the proposed evaluation method were successfully implemented in soil with hydraulic conductivity around 9E-7 m/s, which expanded the application scope of SEAS technology for contaminant removal.

Effects of airflow rate distribution and nitrobenzene removal in an aquifer with a low-permeability lens during surfactant-enhanced air sparging

The application of surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) in heterogeneous aquifers has received increasing attention. In this study, a two-dimensional laboratory visualization device was used to study the migration and distribution mechanism of airflow and the nitrobenzene removal effect in an aquifer with a low-permeability lens during AS and SEAS. Experimental results showed that the surfactant significantly reduced the blocking effect of the geological interface on airflow, and the ΔP_e (the air entry pressure difference between the background media and the lens) value of the geological interface decreased from 1.1 kPa to 0.3 kPa when the surfactant concentration was 800 mg/L. When the surfactant injection location was at the center of the lens and the injection volume was 1 PV (pore volume of the lens), part of the airflow entered the lens through its below interface, which clearly improved the nitrobenzene removal inside and above the lens compared with AS remediation. However, when SEAS remediation was 24 h, the surfactant redistribution caused by air sparging resulted in the airflow entering the lens to bypass the lens again, which changed the spatial distribution of airflow rate and was not conducive to the continuous removal of nitrobenzene inside the lens.

Effects of surfactant injection position on the airflow pattern and contaminant removal efficiency of surfactant-enhanced air sparging

Surfactant-enhanced air sparging (SEAS) is an effective remediation technique for VOCs-contaminated soil. In this study, three types of tests are performed to investigate the effects of the surfactant injection position on the airflow pattern, contaminant removal efficiency, and airflow path control. The three tests are conventional air sparging (CAS), entire SEAS (ESEAS), where the surfactant is incorporated into the entire contaminated soil, and local SEAS (LSEAS), where the surfactant is injected locally at different positions. With increasing distance between the injection position and the central axis, the LSEAS test results approach the results measured in the CAS test. When the surfactant is injected directly at the central axis, a high contaminant removal rate of 89% is obtained, which is even higher than that obtained for the ESEAS test. As the injection position moves away from the central axis, the removal rate decreases. Furthermore, when the injection position is close to the sparging point, the surfactant can successfully control the airflow path. Based on the test results, a critical distance between the surfactant injection position and sparging point exists where high remediation efficiency can be achieved. This optimal surfactant injection position is specific to each contamination site.