Survival of patients with acute pulmonary embolism treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mechanical circulatory support in acute pulmonary embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition caused by the thrombo-embolic obstruction of pulmonary arteries, which often leads to haemodynamic instability, right ventricular failure, and potentially death. Patients with massive or high-risk PE are particularly vulnerable and may not respond to conventional treatments, necessitating the implementation of mechanical circulatory support. Here, we discuss recent advancements in the diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of patients with high-risk PE and highlight the need for rapid and personalized treatment strategies.

VA-ECOM assisted percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy treatment high-risk pulmonary embolism

Background

Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) is increasingly used in the treatment of intermediate and high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE), and the treatment of high-risk PE with the aid of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has also been reported. However, there are few reports of VA-ECOM-assisted PMT in the treatment of high-risk PE. The purpose of this study is to summarize the data of 11 patients with high-risk PE treated with VA-ECMO assisted PMT, and propose feasible treatment methods for such patients.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with acute high-risk PE who were treated with VA-ECMO-assisted PMT from January 2021 to June 2024. The analysis focused on the right/left ventricle ratio, biomarkers, and pulmonary artery pressure before and after the VA-ECMO-assisted PMT treatment.

Results

All 11 high-risk PE patients suffered cardiac arrest before treatment, computered tomograhy pulmonary angiography (CTPA) confirmed the diagnosis of PE, and all patients received VA-ECMO-assisted PMT therapy. The median age of the 11 patients was 54 years (range 18-72), the median duration of ECMO was 4.48 days (range 1.04-18.02), and the mean hospitalization time was 21 days (range 14-112). All patients received percutaneous thrombectomy, achieving a 100% technical success rate. The mortality rate was 27.3% during the 90-day follow-up. The 12-month mortality rate was 36.4%.

Conclusion

VA-ECMO-assisted PMT technology can rapidly improve pulmonary hemodynamics while maintaining stable blood flow, thereby reducing in-hospital mortality in high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism complicated by cardiac arrest.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in high-risk pulmonary embolism: A narrative review

Emergent reperfusion, most commonly with the administration of thrombolytic agents, is the recommended management approach for patients presenting with high-risk, or hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism. However, a subset of patients with a more catastrophic presentation, including refractory shock and impending or active cardiopulmonary arrest, may require immediate circulatory support. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can be deployed rapidly by the well-trained team and provide systemic perfusion allowing for hemodynamic stabilization. Subsequent embolectomy or a standalone strategy allowing for thrombus autolysis may be followed with decannulation after several days. Retrospective studies and registry data suggest favorable clinical outcomes with the use of VA-ECMO as an upfront stabilization strategy even among patients presenting with cardiopulmonary arrest. In this review, we discuss the physiologic rationale, evidence base, and an approach to ECMO deployment and subsequent management strategies among select patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism.

Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with critical acute pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) might be required as a treatment option in patients with critical pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the clinical features and outcomes of the use of ECMO for critical acute PE are still limited. The present study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics, management strategies and outcomes of patients with acute PE requiring ECMO in the current era using data from a large-scale observational database.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of the COMMAND VTE Registry-2: a physician-initiated, multicenter, retrospective cohort study enrolling consecutive patients with acute symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Among 2035 patients with acute symptomatic PE, there were 76 patients (3.7%) requiring ECMO.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean age was 58.4 years, and 34 patients (44.7%) were men. Cardiac arrest or circulatory collapse at diagnosis was reported in 67 patients (88.2%). The 30-day incidence of all-cause death was 30.3%, which were all PE-related deaths. The 30-day incidence of major bleeding was 54.0%, and the vast majority of bleedings were procedure site-related bleeding events and surgery-related bleeding (22.4%). The 30-day incidence of all-cause death was 6.3% in 16 patients with surgical intervention, 43.8% in 16 patients with catheter intervention, 25.0% in 16 patients with thrombolytic therapy, and 39.3% in 28 patients with anticoagulation only.

CONCLUSIONS

The current large real-world VTE registry in Japan revealed clinical features and outcomes of critical acute PE requiring ECMO in the current era, which suggested several unmet needs for future clinical trials.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Reperfusion Strategies in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Hospitalizations

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the contemporary use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in conjunction with reperfusion strategies in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

DESIGN

Observational epidemiological analysis.

SETTING

The U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (years 2016-2020).

PATIENTS

High-risk PE hospitalizations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based reperfusion (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) or mechanical reperfusion (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. We identified high-risk PE hospitalizations in the NIS (years 2016-2020) and investigated the use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) and mechanical (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) reperfusion strategies with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. Among 122,735 hospitalizations for high-risk PE, ECMO was used in 2,805 (2.3%); stand-alone in 1.4%, thrombolysis-based reperfusion in 0.4%, and mechanical reperfusion in 0.5%. Compared with neither reperfusion nor ECMO, ECMO plus thrombolysis-based reperfusion was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), whereas no difference was found with ECMO plus mechanical reperfusion (aOR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.67-1.60), and ECMO stand-alone was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.22-2.10). In the cardiac arrest subgroup, ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93). Among all patients on ECMO, thrombolysis-based reperfusion was significantly associated (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91), and mechanical reperfusion showed a trend (aOR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.19) toward reduced in-hospital mortality compared with no reperfusion, without increases in major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with high-risk PE and refractory hemodynamic instability, ECMO may be a valuable supportive treatment in conjunction with reperfusion treatment but not as a stand-alone treatment especially for patients suffering from cardiac arrest.

Clinical Outcome Using Different Catheter Interventional Treatment Modalities in High-Risk Pulmonary Artery Embolism

BACKGROUND

For patients with high-risk pulmonary artery embolism (PE), catheter-directed therapies pose a viable alternative treatment option to systemic thrombolysis or anticoagulation. Right now, there are multiple devices available which have been proven to be safe and effective in lower-risk settings. There is, however, little data comparing their efficacies in high-risk PE.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center study on patients with high-risk PE undergoing catheter interventional treatment. Patients receiving large-bore catheter thrombectomy were compared to patients receiving alternative treatment forms.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients included, 9 received large-bore thrombectomy, and 11 received alternative interventional treatments. While the baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, periprocedural and in-hospital mortality tended to be significantly lower with large-bore thrombectomy when compared to other treatment forms (0 vs. 55% and 33 vs. 82%, p = 0.07 and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small, retrospective study, large-bore thrombectomy was associated with lower mortality as compared to alternative treatment forms. Future prospective research is needed to corroborate these findings.

Evidence-Based Update on Transcatheter Therapies for Pulmonary Embolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Multiple new therapies are in development and under study to improve our contemporary care of patients with PE. We review and compare here these novel therapeutics and technologies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple novel therapeutic devices have been developed and are under active study. This work has advanced the care of patients with intermediate and high-risk PE. Novel therapies are improving care of complex PE patients. These have inspired large multicenter international randomized controlled trials that are actively recruiting patients to advance the care of PE. These studies will work towards advancing guidelines for clinical care of patients with PE.

Role of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Treatment of Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Massive/high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a 30-day mortality rate of approximately 65%. In searching for strategies that may make a dent on this dismal mortality rate, investigators have, over the last decade, shown renewed interest in the potential beneficial role of venoarterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of patients with high-risk PE. There is a dearth of high-quality evidence regarding the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE. Studies examining this issue have generally been retrospective, often single center and frequently with small patient numbers. Moreover, these reported studies are not matched with appropriate controls, and, accordingly, it is difficult to regulate for inherent treatment bias. Not surprisingly, there are no randomized controlled trials examining the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, as such trials would pose formidable feasibility challenges. Over the past several years, there has been increasing support for upfront use of V-A ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, when it is complicated by cardiac arrest. In those patients without cardiac arrest, but who have contraindications for thrombolysis, V-A ECMO combined with anticoagulation may be used to stabilize the patient. If after 3 to 5 days, such patients demonstrate persistent right ventricular dysfunction, embolectomy (either surgical or catheter based) should be performed. Well-designed, multicenter, prospective studies are urgently needed to better define the role of V-A ECMO in the treatment of patients with massive PE.

Availability in ECMO Reduces the Failure to Rescue in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism After Major Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis of 2.4 Million Cases

Objective

Postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, which can be treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, a novel therapy option for acute cardiorespiratory failure. We postulate that hospitals with ECMO availability have more experienced staff, technical capabilities, and expertise in treating cardiorespiratory failure.

Design

A retrospective analysis of surgical procedures in Germany between 2012 and 2019 was performed using hospital billing data. High-risk surgical procedures for postoperative PE were analyzed according to the availability of and expertise in ECMO therapy and its effect on outcome, regardless of whether ECMO was used in patients with PE.

Methods

Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were applied to identify possible associations and correct for confounding factors (complications, complication management, and mortality).

Results

A total of 13,976,606 surgical procedures were analyzed, of which 2,407,805 were defined as high-risk surgeries. The overall failure to rescue (FtR) rate was 24.4% and increased significantly with patient age, as well as type of surgery. The availability of and experience in ECMO therapy (defined as at least 20 ECMO applications per year; ECMO centers) are associated with a significantly reduced FtR in patients with PE after high-risk surgical procedures. In a multivariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for FtR after postoperative PE was significantly lower in ECMO centers (OR, 0.75 [0.70-0.81], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The availability of and expertise in ECMO therapy lead to a significantly reduced FtR rate of postoperative PE. This improved outcome is independent of the use of ECMO in these patients.

Integration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation into the Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Overview of Current Evidence

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) refers to a large embolic burden causing right ventricular failure and hemodynamic instability. It accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of PE but contributes significantly to overall PE mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is the first-line revascularization therapy in high-risk PE. Surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy is recommended in patients with an absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides respiratory and hemodynamic support for the most critically ill PE patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The complex management of these individuals requires urgent yet coordinated multidisciplinary care. In light of existing evidence regarding the utility of ECMO in the management of high-risk PE patients, a number of possible indications for ECMO utilization have been suggested in the literature. Specifically, in patients with refractory cardiac arrest, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or refractory shock, including in cases of failed thrombolysis, venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) should be considered, either as a bridge to percutaneous or surgical embolectomy or as a bridge to recovery after surgical embolectomy. We review here the current evidence on the use of ECMO as part of the management strategy for the highest-risk presentations of PE and summarize the latest data in this indication.

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Patients with High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common acute cardiovascular condition. Within this review, we discuss the incidence, pathophysiology, and treatment options for patients with high-risk and massive pulmonary embolisms. In particular, we focus on the role of mechanical circulatory support devices and their possible therapeutic benefits in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapeutic options. Moreover, attention is given to device selection criteria, weaning protocols, and complication mitigation strategies. Finally, we underscore the necessity for more comprehensive studies to corroborate the benefits and safety of MCS devices in PE management.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation With or Without Advanced Intervention for Massive Pulmonary Embolism

INTRODUCTION

Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) is a rare but highly fatal condition. Our study's objective was to evaluate the association between advanced interventions and survival among patients with MPE treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry data. We included adult patients with MPE who were treated with VA-ECMO during 2010-2020. Our Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge; secondary outcomes were ECMO duration among survivors and rates of ECMO-related complications. Clinical variables were compared using the Pearson chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H tests.

RESULTS

We included 802 patients; 80 (10%) received SPE and 18 (2%) received CDT. Overall, 426 (53%) survived to discharge; survival was not significantly different among those treated with SPE or CDT on VA-ECMO (70%) versus VA-ECMO alone (52%) or SPE or CDT before VA-ECMO (52%). Multivariable regression found a trend towards increased survival among those treated with SPE or CDT while on ECMO (AOR 1.8, 95% CI 0.9-3.6), but no significant correlation. There was no association between advanced interventions and ECMO duration among survivors, or rates of ECMO-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Our study found no difference in survival in patients with MPE who received advanced interventions prior to ECMO, and a slight non-significant benefit in those who received advanced interventions while on ECMO.

Head-to-toe bedside ultrasound for adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Bedside ultrasound represents a well-suited diagnostic and monitoring tool for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) who may be too unstable for transport to other hospital areas for diagnostic tests. The role of ultrasound, however, starts even before ECMO initiation. Every patient considered for ECMO should have a thorough ultrasonographic assessment of cardiac and valvular function, as well as vascular anatomy without delaying ECMO cannulation. The role of pre-ECMO ultrasound is to confirm the indication for ECMO, identify clinical situations for which ECMO is not indicated, rule out contraindications, and inform the choice of ECMO configuration. During ECMO cannulation, the use of vascular and cardiac ultrasound reduces the risk of complications and ensures adequate cannula positioning. Ultrasound remains key for monitoring during ECMO support and troubleshooting ECMO complications. For instance, ultrasound is helpful in the assessment of drainage insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, biventricular function, persistent hypoxemia, and recirculation on venovenous (VV) ECMO. Lung ultrasound can be used to monitor signs of recovery on VV ECMO. Brain ultrasound provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information on ECMO. Echocardiography is essential in the assessment of readiness for liberation from venoarterial (VA) ECMO. Lastly, post decannulation ultrasound mainly aims at identifying post decannulation thrombosis and vascular complications. This review will cover the role of head-to-toe ultrasound for the management of adult ECMO patients from decision to initiate ECMO to the post decannulation phase.

Mechanical Support in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Review Article

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) may manifest with mild nonspecific symptoms or progress to a more severe hemodynamic collapse and sudden cardiac arrest. A substantial thrombotic burden can precipitate sudden right ventricular strain and failure. Traditionally, systemic thrombolytics have been employed in such scenarios; however, patients often present with contraindications, or these interventions may prove ineffective. Outcomes for this medically complex patient population are unfavorable, necessitating a compelling argument for advanced therapeutic modalities or alternative approaches. Moreover, patients frequently experience complications beyond hemodynamic instability, such as profound hypoxia and multiorgan failure, necessitating assertive early interventions to avert catastrophic consequences. The existing data on the utilization of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are not exhaustive. Various options for percutaneous MCS devices exist, each possessing distinct advantages and disadvantages. There is an imminent imperative to develop a tailored approach for this high-risk patient cohort to enhance their overall outcomes.

Intensive Care Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a significant cause of morbidity and requires prompt diagnosis and management. The prognosis of affected patients depends on the clinical severity. Therefore, risk stratification is imperative for therapeutic decision-making. Patients with high-risk PE need intensive care. These include patients who have successfully survived resuscitation, with obstructive shock or persistent haemodynamic instability. Bedside diagnostics by means of sonographic procedures are of outstanding importance in this high-risk population. In addition to the treatment of hypoxaemia with noninvasive and invasive techniques, the focus is on drug-based haemodynamic stabilisation and usually requires the elimination or reduction of pulmonary vascular thrombotic obstruction by thrombolysis. In the event of a contraindication to thrombolysis or failure of thrombolysis, various catheter-based procedures for thrombus extraction and local thrombolysis are available today and represent an increasing alternative to surgical embolectomy. Mechanical circulatory support systems can bridge the gap between circulatory arrest or refractory shock and definitive stabilisation but are reserved for centres with the appropriate expertise. Therapeutic strategies for patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE in terms of reduced-dose thrombolytic therapy or catheter-based procedures need to be further evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

High and intermediate risk pulmonary embolism in the ICU

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and important medical emergency, encountered by clinicians across all acute care specialties. PE is a relatively uncommon cause of direct admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), but these patients are at high risk of death. More commonly, patients admitted to ICU develop PE as a complication of an unrelated acute illness. This paper reviews the epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, and particularly the management of PE from a critical care perspective. Issues around prevention, anticoagulation, fibrinolysis, catheter-based techniques, surgical embolectomy, and extracorporeal support are discussed.

Mechanical Support Strategies for High-Risk Procedures in the Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A State-of-the-Art Review

Thanks to advancements in percutaneous cardiac interventions, an expanding patient population now qualifies for treatment through percutaneous endovascular procedures. High-risk interventions far exceed coronary interventions and include transcatheter aortic valve replacement, endovascular management of acute pulmonary embolism and ventricular tachycardia ablation. Given the frequent impairment of ventricular function in these patients, frequently deteriorating during percutaneous interventions, it is hypothesized that mechanical ventricular support may improve periprocedural survival and subsequently patient outcome. In this narrative review, we aimed to provide the relevant evidence found for the clinical use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS). We searched the Pubmed database for articles related to pMCS and to pMCS and invasive cath lab procedures. The articles and their references were evaluated for relevance. We provide an overview of the clinically relevant evidence for intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, TandemHeart and ECMO and their role as pMCS in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, transcatheter valvular procedures, ablations and high-risk pulmonary embolism. We found that the right choice of periprocedural pMCS could provide a solution for the hemodynamic challenges during these procedures. However, to enhance the understanding of the safety and effectiveness of pMCS devices in an often high-risk population, more randomized research is needed.

Interventional therapies in acute pulmonary embolus-current trends and future directions

Venous thromboembolic disease presenting with acute pulmonary embolus (PE) can be treated in a variety of ways from anticoagulation as an outpatient to surgical embolectomy with many new interventional therapies being developed. Mortality in these patients can be as high as 50% and many of these treatments are also considered to be high risk. Early involvement of a multidisciplinary team and patient risk stratification can aid management decisions in these complex patients who can suddenly deteriorate.In this review, we summarise the evidence behind new and developing interventional therapies in the treatment of high and intermediate-high risk PE including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, thromboaspiration and the growing role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the stabilisation and management of this cohort of patients.

Mechanical Circulatory Support and Critical Care Management of High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a widely prevalent, underdiagnosed condition associated with mortality rates as high as 30%. The main driver of poor outcomes is acute right ventricular failure that remains clinically challenging to diagnose and requires critical care management. Treatment of high-risk (or massive) acute PE has traditionally included systemic anticoagulation and thrombolysis. Mechanical circulatory support, including both percutaneous and surgical approaches, are emerging as treatment options for refractory shock due to acute right ventricular failure in the setting of high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.

Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism in Japan, 2010 to 2020: A Nationwide Inpatient Database Study

Background The impact of major changes in the treatment practice of pulmonary embolism (PE), such as limited indications for systemic thrombolysis and the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants, is not well documented. This study aimed to describe annual trends in the treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with PE. Methods and Results Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database from April 2010 to March 2021, we identified hospitalized patients with PE. Patients with high-risk PE were defined as those admitted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, vasopressors, or invasive mechanical ventilation on the day of admission. The remaining patients were defined as patients with non-high-risk PE. The patient characteristics and outcomes were reported with fiscal year trend analyses. Of 88 966 eligible patients, 8116 (9.1%) had high-risk PE, and the remaining 80 850 (90.9%) had non-high-risk PE. Between 2010 and 2020, in patients with high-risk PE, the annual proportion of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use significantly increased from 11.0% to 21.3%, whereas that of thrombolysis use significantly decreased from 22.5% to 15.5% (P for trend <0.001 for both). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 51.0% to 43.7% (P for trend=0.04). In patients with non-high-risk PE, the annual proportion of direct oral anticoagulant use increased from 0.0% to 38.3%, whereas that of thrombolysis use significantly decreased from 13.7% to 3.4% (P for trend <0.001 for both). In-hospital mortality significantly decreased from 7.9% to 5.4% (P for trend <0.001). Conclusions Substantial changes in the PE practice and outcomes occurred in patients with high-risk and non-high-risk PE.

Blueprint for developing an effective pulmonary embolism response network

INTRODUCTION

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Portugal. It is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death after stroke and myocardial infarction. However, the management of acute PE remains poorly standardized, and there is a lack of access to mechanical reperfusion when indicated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This working group analyzed the current clinical guidelines for the use of percutaneous catheter-directed treatment in this setting and proposed a standardized approach for severe forms of acute PE. This document also proposes a methodology for the coordination of regional resources in order to create an effective PE response network, based on the hub-and-spoke organization design.

CONCLUSION

This model can be applied at the regional level, but it is desirable to extend it to the national level.

Management of Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest

Perioperative arrests are both uncommon and heterogeneous and have not been described or studied to the same extent as cardiac arrest in the community. These crises are usually witnessed, frequently anticipated, and involve a rescuer physician with knowledge of the patient's comorbidities and coexisting anesthetic or surgically related pathophysiology ultimately leading to better outcomes. This article reviews the most probable causes of intraoperative arrest and their management.

Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment: circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is being increasingly used in several critical situations but evidence of its impact on outcomes is inconsistent. Understanding of the specific indications and appropriate timing of implantation of this technology might lead to improved results. Indeed, the line between success and futility may be sometimes very thin when facing a patient in critical condition. New techniques with lighter, simpler and effective devices are being developed. Hence, ECMO has become an accessible technology that is being increasingly used outside of the operating room by heart failure specialists, critical care cardiologists and intensivists. Proper timing of utilization and choice of device may lead to better outcomes. We herein aim to improve this knowledge gap by conducting a literature review to provide simple information, evidence-based indications and a practical approach for cardiologists who may encounter acutely ill adult patients that may be ECMO candidates. This article is part of the Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/emerging-concepts-in-heart-failure-management-and-treatment.

Successful management of hemodynamic instability secondary to saddle pulmonary embolism-induced cardiac arrest using VA-ECMO in advanced malignancy with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Saddle pulmonary embolism (SPE) represents a rare type of venous thromboembolism that frequently causes circulation collapse and sudden death. While venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been well established as a salvage treatment for SPE-induced circulatory shock, it is infrequently administered in patients with advanced malignancy, especially those with brain metastases, given the potential bleeding complications and an uncertain prognosis. As far, there are rare case reports regarding the successful management of hemodynamic instability secondary to SPE-induced cardiac arrest using VA-ECMO in advanced malignancy patients with brain metastases.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old woman presenting with cough and waist discomfort who had a history of lung cancer with brain metastases was admitted to the hospital to receive chemoradiotherapy. She suffered sudden cardiac arrest during hospitalization and returned to spontaneous circulation after receiving a 10-min high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pulmonary embolism was suspected due to the collapsed hemodynamics and a distended right ventricle identified by echocardiography. Subsequent computed tomographic pulmonary angiography revealed a massive saddle thrombus straddling the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk. VA-ECMO with adjusted-dose systemic heparinization was initiated to rescue the unstable hemodynamics despite receiving thrombolytic therapy with alteplase. Immediately afterward, the hemodynamic status of the patient stabilized rapidly. VA-ECMO was successfully discontinued within 72 h of initiation without any clotting or bleeding complications. She was weaned off invasive mechanical ventilation on the 6th day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and discharged from the ICU 3 days later with good neurological function.

CONCLUSION

VA-ECMO may be a 'bridging' therapy to circulation recovery during reperfusion therapy for SPE-induced hemodynamic collapse in malignancy patients with brain metastases.

Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and surgical embolectomy in acute pulmonary embolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgery is an important option to consider in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary emboli. Earlier intervention, better patient selection, improved surgical techniques and the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) have contributed to improve the safety of surgery for pulmonary emboli.

RECENT FINDINGS

VA ECMO is rapidly changing the initial management of patients with massive pulmonary emboli, providing an opportunity for stabilization and optimization before intervention. The early and long-term consequences of acute pulmonary emboli are better understood, in particular with regard to the risks of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), an entity that should be identified in the acute setting as much as possible. The presence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease can be associated with persistent haemodynamic instability despite removal of the acute thrombi, particularly if pulmonary hypertension is established. The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) is an important component in the management of massive and submassive acute pulmonary emboli to determine the best treatment options for each patient depending on their clinical presentation.

SUMMARY

Three types of surgery can be performed for pulmonary emboli depending on the extent and degree of organization of the thrombi (pulmonary embolectomy, pulmonary thrombo-embolectomy and pulmonary thrombo-endarterectomy). Other treatment options in the context of acute pulmonary emboli include thrombolysis and catheter-directed embolectomy. Future research should determine how best to integrate VA ECMO as a bridging strategy to recovery or intervention in the treatment algorithm of patients with acute massive pulmonary emboli.

Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Historical Considerations/Surgical Techniques of Pulmonary Embolectomy/Novel Applications in Donor Lungs with Pulmonary Emboli

Pulmonary embolectomy has a chequered history but the quest to surgically treat a patient diagnosed with pulmonary embolism effectively spurred the development of cardiopulmonary bypass and a new dawn for cardiac surgery. The advent of cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and computed tomography pulmonary angiogram has allowed rapid diagnosis and made surgical pulmonary embolectomy a relatively safe procedure that should be considered when indicated. Pulmonary emboli in donor lungs, often get rejected for transplantation. Ex vivo lung perfusion is among newly available technology with the ability to not only recondition marginal lungs but also treat donor lung pulmonary embolisms, effectively increasing the donor pool.

Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Place of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence rate ranging from 39-115 per 100,000 inhabitants. It is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular mortality in the USA and Europe. While the clinical presentation and severity may vary, it is a life-threatening condition in its most severe form, defined as high-risk or massive PE. Therapeutic options in high-risk PE are limited. Current guidelines recommend the use of systemic thrombolytic therapy as first-line therapy (Level Ib). However, this treatment has important drawbacks including bleeding complications, limited efficacy in patients with recurrent PE or cardiac arrest, and formal contraindications. In this context, the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in the management of high-risk PE has increased worldwide in the last decade. Strategies, including VA-ECMO as a stand-alone therapy or as a bridge to alternative reperfusion therapies, are associated with acceptable outcomes, especially if implemented before cardiac arrest. Nonetheless, the level of evidence supporting ECMO and alternative reperfusion therapies is low. The optimal management of high-risk PE patients will remain controversial until the realization of a prospective randomized trial comparing those cited strategies to systemic thrombolysis.

Clinical use and outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with pulmonary embolism

AIM OF THE STUDY

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is considered a life-saving treatment option for patients in cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) due to acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We sought to analyze use and outcome of ECMO with or without adjunctive treatment strategies in patients with acute PE.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on patient characteristics, treatments, and in-hospital outcomes for all PE patients (ICD-code I26) undergoing ECMO in Germany between 2005 and 2018.

RESULTS

At total of 1,172,354 patients were hospitalized with PE; of those, 2,197 (0.2%) were treated with ECMO support. Cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation was present in 77,196 (6.5%) patients. While more than one fourth of those patients were treated with systemic thrombolysis alone (n = 20,839 patients; 27.0%), a minority of patients received thrombolysis and VA-ECMO (n = 165; 0.2%), embolectomy and VA-ECMO (n = 385; 0.5%) or VA-ECMOalone (n = 588; 0.8%). A multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated the lowest risk for in-hospital death in patients who received embolectomy in combination with VA-ECMO (OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.41-0.61], p < 0.001), thrombolysis and VA-ECMO (0.60 [0.43-0.85], p = 0.003) or VA-ECMO alone (0.68 [0.57-0.82], p < 0.001) compared to thrombolysis alone (1.04 [0.99-1.01], p = 0.116).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of VA-ECMO alone or as part of a multi-pronged reperfusion approach including embolectomy or thrombolysis might offer survival advantages compared to thrombolysis alone in patients with PE deteriorating to cardiac arrest.