Selection of a virus strain resistant to entecavir in a nucleoside-naive patient with hepatitis B of genotype H

Evolutionary history of hepatitis B virus genotype H

Hepatitis B virus genotype H (HBV-H) molecular evolution was studied by comparing all published whole-genome sequences. Bayesian coalescent analysis was performed to estimate phylogenetic relationships, time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA), and viral population dynamics along the time. Phylogenetic tree demonstrated two main clades or lineages: HBV-H I (with sequences from Central and North America) and HBV-H II (with sequences from North and South America, and Asia). HBV-H II had more genome sequences (n = 26; 83.9%), including one specific subclade with all sequences outside of the Americas. Overall HBV-H tMRCA dated back to 1933 (95% highest posterior density interval [HPD 95%]: 1875-1957) with a very probable origin in Mexico and posterior dissemination to other American and Asian countries. The temporal analysis demonstrated that HBV-H I spread only in Mexico and the neighbor country of Nicaragua probably in the 1960s to the 1970s (1968; HPD 95%: 1908-1981), while HBV-II disseminated to other American and Asian countries around one decade later (1977; HPD 95%: 1925-1985). The phylogeographic analysis reinforced the Mexican origin of this genotype. The whole HBV-H population increased from the 1980s to the 2000s. In conclusion, HBV-H has two main lineages with a common origin in Mexico approximately nine decades ago.

Entecavir resistance in a patient with treatment-naïve HBV: A case report

Among nucleos(t)ide analogue therapies for hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment, entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/tenofovir alafenamide are associated with the lowest rate of drug resistance. ETV is a drug requiring at least three substitutions in the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain to develop resistance, which is a rare occasion in treatment-naïve patients. However, pre-existing or acquired single mutations in the RT domain could lead to a virological breakthrough, after viral suppression. The present case report describes a 58-year-old female patient with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and high viral load who started HBV treatment with ETV. After 85 weeks of treatment, HBV-DNA declined to 0 IU/ml and remained undetectable for 3 years. However, after that period of time, the HBV-DNA rebounded, followed by the rise of liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase). Only the substitution M204I was detected in the HBV polymerase region. The patient was then switched to TDF treatment, achieving normalization of the liver enzymes and a decline in HBV-DNA levels. The present case report suggests that nucleoside-naïve patients should be cautiously monitored for resistance, even more than biochemically (transaminases, bilirubin) and virologically (HBV-DNA), even if complete HBV suppression is achieved.

Long-term outcome of entecavir treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in Japan

BACKGROUND

We determined the antiviral potency and viral breakthrough rate after 10 years of continuous entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.

METHODS

The cumulative rates of undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA, < 2.1 log copies/mL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance, and viral breakthrough of 1094 nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve CHB patients (HBeAg-positive: 47%) who were on continuous entecavir treatment for 10 years were calculated.

RESULTS

The median age was 50 years and follow-up period was 5.5 years, with 999, 804, 591, 390, 182 and 87 patients followed up for at least 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 10 years, respectively. Incremental increases were noted in the rates of undetectable HBV-DNA, ALT normalization, HBeAg seroclearance, and HBsAg seroclearance, reaching 96, 79, 38 and 3.7%, respectively, by the tenth year. The mean decline in HBsAg level from baseline was - 0.08 log IU/mL/year. Multivariate analysis identified HBsAg level and genotype (A) as independent predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. Sixteen patients experienced viral breakthrough. The cumulative percentages of patients with viral breakthrough analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier test were 1.5 and 2.5% at years 5 and 10, respectively. There were no serious adverse events during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term entecavir treatment of nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve CHB patients was associated with an excellent viral response and a low rate of entecavir-resistant mutations at 10 years. Baseline HBsAg levels and genotype were predictors of HBsAg seroclearance during entecavir treatment.

Predominance of Hepatitis B Virus Genotype A Among Treated HIV Infected Patients Experiencing High Hepatitis B Virus Drug Resistance in Nairobi, Kenya

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-HIV coinfections are becoming common with information on HBV genetic diversity and drug resistance still remaining elusive. To evaluate the HBV genetic diversity and drug resistance-associated mutations among drug-experienced HIV patients, the genetic analysis of the partial HBV-pol-reverse trancriptase gene was successfully sequenced from 13 samples. Analysis of the sequences showed that all (11) the sequences belonged to genotype A. Nucleos(t)ide drug resistance mutations were found in 6 patients. Five subjects had rtV173L, rtL180M, and rtM204V and one with rtL180M and rtM204V major mutations. HBV genotype A remains the most predominant genotype circulating in Nairobi city with detected high level of HBV drug resistance to lamivudine, telbivudine, and emtricitabine. The detected circulating HBV genotype A in Nairobi reflects its possible spread in the population with its origin being within the country. We suggest that patients should not be on lamivudine monotherapy. These individuals should be managed on combination of tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine therapy to prevent the emergence of HBV drug resistant variants alongside a continuous surveillance monitoring of drug resistance and HBV genotypes.

Profile of HBV polymerase gene mutations during entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the efficacy of entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in 54 naïve patients and 27 lamivudine (LMV) and/or adefovir (ADV) experienced patients.

METHODS

Eighty-one chronic hepatitis B patients with a viral load above 4 log 10 copies/ml and high levels of serum alanine aminotransferase were treated with ETV 0.5mg daily. The viruses of patients were sequenced before ETV therapy and after every three months of ETV therapy.

RESULTS

Eight LAM-experienced and ADV-experienced patients emerged mutations in the ETV treatment. In one of these experienced patients, the ETV-resistant mutations were detected during ETV treatment, with the virological and the biochemical breakthrough. Two LAM-experienced and ADV-naïve patients were detected mutation during 1-2 years ETV therapy. All three LAM-naïve and ADV-experienced patients were detected mutations in the ETV treatment. Five in fifty for LAM-naïve and ADV-naïve patients showed mutations in the ETV monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ETV has a high genetic barrier to resistance and the efficacy in LAM-experienced and/or ADV-experienced patients were much lower than in naïve patients.

Response to potent anti-HBV agents in chronic hepatitis B and combined effect of HBV reverse transcriptase mutations

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Response to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy against HBV infection depends on a number of factors. One of them is appearance of drug resistance mutations. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ETV and TDF as anti-HBV agents and to analyze the role of HBV-RT mutations in reducing the efficacy of mentioned drugs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty nine treatment naïve CHB patients (mean age 33.8 ± 11.9 years) were enrolled and treated with ETV or TDF for one year. Complete virological response (CVR) was defined as undetectable serum HBV DNA after 12 months of therapy. Amino acid and nucleotide sequence analyses of HBV-RT region were performed using Geno2pheno HBV drug resistance tool. The 3D model of HBV-RT protein was built by I-TASSER server and RMSD was calculated between wild type and mutated HBV-RT protein.

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, four CHB patients did not achieve CVR and all of them were with HBV genotype D. HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in 56% HBeAg positive patients after 12 months of antiviral therapy. The HBV-RT amino acid sequences from these four patients were used for in-silico analysis. It was found that the presence of many mutations in HBV-RT region of HBV isolated from these patients led to a high degree of variation in configuration of atoms of HBV-RT protein and also caused displacement of active site of this protein.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of antiviral drugs in inhibiting HBV replication may be reduced by combined effect of many HBV-RT mutations; however, an in vitro study is needed to validate the findings.

Partial virological response to three different nucleotide analogues in naive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The definition of partial virological response (PVR) was proposed because of its clinical relevance. PVR relates to subsequent therapeutic failure which results in the modification of the regimen. Whether this rationale can be applied to all nucleotide analogues (NA) is not clear. This study was undertaken to analyze PVR influence on therapeutic outcomes during lamivudine, entecavir or tenofovir monotherapy in NA-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 150 NA-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B. These subjects received lamivudine, entecavir or tenofovir monotherapy between February 2001 and July 2013.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were treated with lamivudine, 35 with entecavir, and 46 with tenofovir. The median therapeutic duration was 19.5 (6-147) months. PVR rates at 24 weeks were similar among three NAs (lamivudine 33.3%, entecavir 35.0%, tenofovir 32.4%, P=0.981). For all three NAs, patients with a higher baseline viral load or HBeAg-positive status had a higher serum viral positive rate tested by polymerase chain reaction at week 24 and 48. Cumulative probability of virological breakthrough (VBR) for patients treated with lamivudine was 67% at 5 years, and PVR at 24 weeks was the independent risk factor for VBR (HR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.09-8.74; P=0.034); also lamivudine treated patients older than 50 years seemed to have a tendency for VBR (HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 0.99-8.18; P=0.052). A majority of entecavir and tenofovir partial responders achieved and maintained virological response with prolonged monotherapy, except one entecavir treated patient who experienced VBR due to resistance mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Management strategy for lamivudine treatment should include adaptation of regimen according to PVR as an on-treatment response parameter due to its relation with unacceptably high VBR probability. Similar conclusion should not be directly related to entecavir or tenofovir treatment.

Increased replicative fitness can lead to decreased drug sensitivity of hepatitis C virus

Passage of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in human hepatoma cells resulted in populations that displayed partial resistance to alpha interferon (IFN-α), telaprevir, daclatasvir, cyclosporine, and ribavirin, despite no prior exposure to these drugs. Mutant spectrum analyses and kinetics of virus production in the absence and presence of drugs indicate that resistance is not due to the presence of drug resistance mutations in the mutant spectrum of the initial or passaged populations but to increased replicative fitness acquired during passage. Fitness increases did not alter host factors that lead to shutoff of general host cell protein synthesis and preferential translation of HCV RNA. The results imply that viral replicative fitness is a mechanism of multidrug resistance in HCV. Importance: Viral drug resistance is usually attributed to the presence of amino acid substitutions in the protein targeted by the drug. In the present study with HCV, we show that high viral replicative fitness can confer a general drug resistance phenotype to the virus. The results exclude the possibility that genomes with drug resistance mutations are responsible for the observed phenotype. The fact that replicative fitness can be a determinant of multidrug resistance may explain why the virus is less sensitive to drug treatments in prolonged chronic HCV infections that favor increases in replicative fitness.

Acute hepatitis B of genotype H resulting in persistent infection

A 47-year-old man presented with general fatigue and dark urine. The laboratory data showed increased levels of hepatic transaminases. The patient was positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers and negative for anti-human immunodeficiency virus. The HBV-DNA titer was set to 7.7 log copies/mL. The patient was diagnosed with acute hepatitis B. The HBV infection route was obscure. The serum levels of hepatic transaminases decreased to normal ranges without any treatment, but the HBV-DNA status was maintained for at least 26 mo, indicating the presence of persistent infection. We isolated HBV from the acute-phase serum and determined the genome sequence. A phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolated HBV was genotype H. In this patient, the elevated peak level of HBV-DNA and the risk alleles at human genome single nucleotide polymorphisms s3077 and rs9277535 in the human leukocyte antigen-DP locus were considered to be risk factors for chronic infection. This case suggests that there is a risk of persistent infection by HBV genotype H following acute hepatitis; further cases of HBV genotype H infection must be identified and characterized. Thus, the complete determination of the HBV genotype may be essential during routine clinical care of acute hepatitis B outpatients.

Distribution of HBV genotypes F and H in Mexico and Central America

The distribution of HBV genotypes is associated with populations of specific geographical regions of the world. We show data from the GenBank sequence database and medical reports, which indicate that HBV genotype H (HBV/H) is mainly distributed in Mexico, whereas HBV genotype F (HBV/F) is distributed in countries from Central America. The phylogenetic analysis and historical records suggest that HBV/H has been present in Mexico even before the arrival of the Spaniards. Interestingly, occult hepatitis B is a common finding in both natives and patients with chronic liver disease in Mexico. This suggests that an immunogenic background could be important during the natural history of liver diseases. The estimated large number of HBV/H-infected patients in Mexico does not correlate with the total number of patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis reported in the country. This may be because of the fact that HBV infection is often masked by alcoholic liver disease, HCV coinfection and/or obesity. Here, we analyse the data concerning the distribution of HBV/F and HBV/H genotypes in Central America and Mexico. Specifically, we focus on the effect of molecular epidemiology and pathogenesis of HBV/H. These recent findings reveal new areas of study with therapeutic potential in viral liver diseases.

Two-step evolution of the hepatitis B drug-resistant mutations in a patient who developed primary entecavir resistance

AIM

Few cases of primary entecavir resistance in chronic hepatitis B patients have been reported to date. The serial profiling of the HBV polymerase gene mutations from a treatment-naive patient who developed drug resistance after 32 months of entecavir therapy is presented here.

DESIGN

Serum samples were collected at multiple time points from before the start of therapy to virological and biochemical breakthrough. The evolution of the hepatitis B virus polymerase gene mutations was analysed with commercial line probe assay and pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

Drug resistance mutation analysis by pyrosequencing revealed a two-step process in the selection of drug resistance. The patient had a good initial response to entecavir 0.5 mg/day. A partially resistant HBV strain first emerged as the predominant species from as early as 2 weeks. After a period of non-compliance to therapy, there was virological breakthrough, which resolved on restarting entecavir. Shortly after, there was secondary failure of entecavir therapy, caused by a new resistant strain carrying all three mutations required.

CONCLUSION

In this patient, pre-existence of minor population of partially resistant viral strains and treatment non-compliance probably contributed to his development of primary entecavir resistance.

Diagnostic and therapeutic progress of multi-drug resistance with anti-HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are a breakthrough in the treatment and management of chronic hepatitis B. NA could suppress the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and control the progression of the disease. However, drug resistance caused by their long-term use becomes a practical problem, which influences the long-term outcomes in patients. Liver transplantation is the only choice for patients with HBV-related end-stage liver disease. But, the recurrence of HBV after transplantation often caused by the development of drug resistance leads to unfavorable outcomes for the recipients. Recently, the multi-drug resistance (MDR) has become a common issue raised due to the development and clinical application of a variety of NA. This may complicate the antiviral therapy and bring poorly prognostic outcomes. Although clinical evidence has suggested that combination therapy with different NA could effectively reduce the viral load in patients with MDR, the advent of new antiviral agents with high potency and high genetic barrier to resistance brings hope to antiviral therapy. The future of HBV researches relies on how to prevent the MDR occurrence and develop reasonable and effective treatment strategies. This review focuses on the diagnostic and therapeutic progress in MDR caused by the anti-HBV NA and describes some new research progress in this field.

Long-term continuous entecavir therapy in nucleos(t)ide-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We determined the antiviral potency and viral resistance rate after 4 years of continuous entecavir treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.

METHODS

The cumulative rates of undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA;<2.6 log(10) copies/ml), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seronegativity, seroconversion, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, and entecavir signature mutations were calculated in 474 nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB patients (HBeAg-positive: 47%) on continuous entecavir treatment for 4 years.

RESULTS

Median age was 47 years and follow-up period was 2.4 years, with 403, 281, 165, and 73 patients followed-up for at least 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Incremental increases were observed in the rates of undetectable HBV DNA, HBeAg seroclearance and seroconversion, and ALT normalization, reaching 96%, 42%, 38% and 93%, respectively, by the fourth year. In all, 100% and 93% of patients negative and positive for HBeAg, respectively, had undetectable HBV DNA at year 4. Of 165 patients, HBV DNA was detectable in nine patients after 3 years. Multivariate analysis identified HBV DNA level (≤7.6 log(10) copies/ml, OR=15.8; 95% CI=43.1-79.9, P=0.001) as an independent predictor of undetectable HBV DNA at year 3. Five patients experienced virological breakthrough including two (0.4%) who developed entecavir-resistance mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous treatment of nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB patients with entecavir over 4 years was associated with 96% chance of undetectable HBV DNA and only 0.4% chance of emerging entecavir-resistant mutations.

Management of treatment failure in chronic hepatitis B

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B remains a clinical challenge. The primary goal of therapy is to prevent liver disease progression. Because of the mechanism of viral persistence in infected hepatocytes, long-term antiviral therapy is needed in the majority of patients. Incomplete viral suppression and emergence of drug resistance is a major concern. The correct choice of a first-line potent therapy to achieve sustained long-term suppression of viral replication provides the best chance of preventing treatment failure and drug resistance. Clinical studies have demonstrated that drugs with a high barrier to resistance, such as entecavir and tenofovir, have significantly lower rates of resistance when compared with those with a low barrier to resistance such as lamivudine, adefovir, or telbivudine. Management of treatment failure requires a precise clinical and accurate virologic monitoring as well as an early treatment intervention with appropriate complementary drugs with respect to their cross-resistance profile. Long-term surveillance for treatment efficacy and possible emergence of drug resistance is necessary for those patients who have been sequentially treated with multiple antivirals. Finally, the identification of novel treatment targets remains a major research challenge to improve the efficacy of current antiviral therapy.

[Analogs combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B: when and how?]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomic variability is responsible for the complexity of the viral quasi-species and its evolution during the course of infection. The persistence of infected cells promotes the selection of drug-resistant strains. The development of nucleoside analogs without cross-resistance has provided a rationale for combination therapy. De novo combination, with low genetic barrier drugs, prevents the emergence of resistance in the short-term for drugs with a low genetic barrier and improves the control of infection. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether de novo combination is beneficial for analogs with a high genetic barrier as well. The add-on strategy is a standard in case of emergence of resistant mutants. This strategy needs to be implemented as early as possible before the virological breakthrough, especially if the viral suppression is sub-optimal. Clinical trials are mandatory in order to assess whether a) de novo combination is better than an early add-on strategy; and b) whether in case of sub-optimal viral suppression, an early add-on strategy is better in the long-term than a switch to a more potent drug with a high genetic barrier.

Partial virological response to entecavir in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The proposed definition of a partial virological response (PVR) to nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in the 2009 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines is based on limited evidence, especially in terms of the cutoff HBV DNA level and the time point at which to judge it. This study assessed optimal PVR criteria for predicting virological response (VR) at week 96 in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) receiving entecavir (ETV).

METHODS

A total of 175 patients (126 men, 49 women) who completed 96 weeks of first-line ETV therapy were prospectively recruited. For predicting VR at week 96, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to find the optimal time point and the Youden index was used to calculate the optimal cutoff HBV DNA level.

RESULTS

After 96 weeks of ETV therapy, 139 (79.4%) patients achieved VR. The AUC at week 48 was significantly better than that at week 24 for predicting VR at week 96 (P=0.023). The optimal cutoff HBV DNA level at week 48 was 35 IU/ml. Forty-one (23.4%) patients met this PVR criteria of ETV (HBV DNA level >35 IU/ml at week 48).

CONCLUSIONS

An HBV DNA level >35 IU/ml at week 48 is the optimal PVR criteria for predicting non-VR at week 96 in treatment-naive patients with CHB who are receiving ETV. This study supports the proposed EASL PVR for ETV based on scientific evidence.

Drug resistance in antiviral therapy

The introduction of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy has seen the emergence of antiviral drug resistance, which has become the main factor limiting the long-term application of these antiviral agents for patients with chronic hepatitis B. The prevention of resistance requires the adoption of strategies that effectively control virus replication and exploit an understanding of the mechanisms and processes that drive the emergence of drug resistance, namely high replication rates, low fidelity of the hepatitis B virus rt/polymerase, selective pressure of the nucleos(t)ide analog, role of replication space (liver turnover), fitness of the mutant, and genetic barrier to the drug.

Clinical and virological effects of long-term (over 5 years) lamivudine therapy

Ideally, long-term lamivudine therapy should not induce tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutants (reverse transcription [rt]; rt M204I/V) in patients with chronic hepatitis B. There is little or no information on the clinical features of patients who do not develop such mutants. We analyzed 368 patients who received lamivudine therapy for more than 6 months between 1995 and 2003. Among them, 98 patients were negative for YMDD mutants during 5-year lamivudine therapy. Multivariate analysis identified hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negativity, lack of cirrhosis, and high gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (GGTP) level as independent factors associated with lack of emergence of YMDD mutants during 5-year treatment. In these 98 patients, 21 patients developed YMDD mutants in the 5-year posttreatment follow-up. Old age was identified as the only factor associated with the emergence of YMDD mutants during that period. For all patients, 53 showed no elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or viral load after emergence of YMDD mutants during 5 years. Short latency to emergence of YMDD mutants, mixed (tyrosine-isoleucine-aspartate-aspartate (YIDD) [rtM204I] + tyrosine-valine-aspartate-aspartate (YVDD) [rtM204V]) type, and low ALT level were identified as independent factors associated with elevation ALT or viral load. HBeAg negativity, lack of cirrhosis, and high GGTP level were associated with lack of emergence of YMDD mutants during 5-year period. Young age protected against emergence of YMDD mutants over the 5-year period. Moreover, after the emergence of YMDD mutants, short latency to the emergence of YMDD mutant, mixed type mutants, and low baseline ALT level were associated with elevation of ALT or viral load.

Two cases of development of entecavir resistance during entecavir treatment for nucleoside-naive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Entecavir (ETV) is a potent nucleoside analogue against hepatitis B virus (HBV), and emergence of drug resistance is rare in nucleoside-naive patients because development of ETV resistance (ETVr) requires at least three amino acid substitutions in HBV reverse transcriptase. We observed two cases of genotypic ETVr with viral rebound and biochemical breakthrough during ETV treatment of nucleoside-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

RESULTS

Case 1: A 44-year-old HBeAg-positive man received ETV 0.1 mg/day for 52 weeks and 0.5 mg/day for 96 weeks consecutively. HBV DNA was 10.0 log(10) copies/ml at baseline, declined to a nadir of 3.1 at week 100, and rebounded to 4.5 at week 124 and 6.7 at week 148. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level increased to 112 IU/l at week 148. Switching to a lamivudine (LVD)/adefovir-dipivoxil combination was effective in decreasing HBV DNA. Case 2: A 47-year-old HBeAg-positive man received ETV 0.5 mg/day for 188 weeks. HBV DNA was 8.2 log(10) copies/ml at baseline, declined to a nadir of 2.9 at week 124, and then rebounded to 4.7 at week 148 and 6.4 at week 160. ALT level increased to 72 IU/l at week 172. The ETVr-related substitution (S202G), along with LVD-resistance-related substitutions (L180M and M204V), was detected by sequence analysis at week 124 in both case 1 and case 2.

CONCLUSIONS

ETVr emerged in two Japanese nucleoside-naive CHB patients after prolonged therapy and incomplete suppression and in one patient after <0.5 mg of dosing. ETV patients with detectable HBV DNA or breakthrough after extended therapy should be evaluated for compliance to therapy and potential emergence of resistance.

Long-term monitoring shows hepatitis B virus resistance to entecavir in nucleoside-naïve patients is rare through 5 years of therapy

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who develop antiviral resistance lose benefits of therapy and may be predisposed to further resistance. Entecavir (ETV) resistance (ETVr) results from HBV reverse transcriptase substitutions at positions T184, S202, or M250, which emerge in the presence of lamivudine (LVD) resistance substitutions M204I/V +/- L180M. Here, we summarize results from comprehensive resistance monitoring of patients with HBV who were continuously treated with ETV for up to 5 years. Monitoring included genotypic analysis of isolates from all patients at baseline and when HBV DNA was detectable by polymerase chain reaction (> or = 300 copies/mL) from Years 1 through 5. In addition, genotyping was performed on isolates from patients experiencing virologic breakthrough (> or = 1 log(10) rise in HBV DNA). In vitro phenotypic ETV susceptibility was determined for virologic breakthrough isolates, and for HBV containing novel substitutions emerging during treatment. The results over 5 years of therapy showed that in nucleoside-naïve patients, the cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with virologic breakthrough was 1.2% and 0.8%, respectively. In contrast, a reduced barrier to resistance was observed in LVD-refractory patients, as the LVD resistance substitutions, a partial requirement for ETVr, preexist, resulting in a 5-year cumulative probability of genotypic ETVr and genotypic ETVr associated with breakthrough of 51% and 43%, respectively. Importantly, only four patients who achieved < 300 copies/mL HBV DNA subsequently developed ETVr.

CONCLUSION

Long-term monitoring showed low rates of resistance in nucleoside-naïve patients during 5 years of ETV therapy, corresponding with potent viral suppression and a high genetic barrier to resistance. These findings support ETV as a primary therapy that enables prolonged treatment with potent viral suppression and minimal resistance.

[Hepatitis B virus genetic diversity and mutant]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a partially double stranded DNA virus with genetic diversity represented by eight genotypes (A to H). Natural course and response to treatment could be affected by HBV genotypes. HBV shows high rates of turn over in the absence of proof-reading ability. As a result, large amounts of quasispecies are produced naturally or antiviral-associated. HBV consists of four open reading frames, namely preS/S gene, precore/core gene, polymerase gene, and X gene. Mutations on preS gene can result in undetectable HBsAg even in case that HBV is replicating. Surface gene mutation leads to decreased binding affinity to anti-HBs, which is associated with a vaccine escape mutant. Precore mutation abolishes HBeAg whereas mutations on basal core promoter gene down-regulate the HBeAg production. Mutations on basal core promoter are associated with increased HBV replication and high incidence of progressive liver diseases such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Mutations on polymerase genes are often induced by antiviral therapy. Emergence of antiviral-resistant mutation is the major cause of treatment failure. Furthermore, existence of prior antiviral-resistant mutations limits the options of subsequent antiviral agents. Therefore, judicious use of antivirals and selection of the most potent drug with the lowest resistance rate are of the utmost importance for the prevention of antiviral-associated mutants. Detailed knowledge and understanding of HBV genetic diversity and mutant would be critical to establish strategies for the diagnosis and management of HBV infection.

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis B

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hepatitis B virus is responsible for much morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although the armament of drugs licensed for its treatment grows, it is increasingly apparent that the efficacy of these drugs is dependent upon much more that their pharmacology.

RECENT FINDINGS

A better understanding of the natural history of chronic hepatitis B infection together with recent advances in the molecular biology of antiviral resistance have given added dimensions to physicians' decision-making thought processes.

SUMMARY

The present review outlines the recent advances in diagnostic testing that enable a better understanding of an individual patient's phase of illness and also how such information can update treatment choices better. In the second part of this review, the licensed therapies and their relative merits are discussed, as is their role in managing resistance to antiviral therapy.

Early emergence of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus in a patient with hepatitis B virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection

The efficacy of entecavir for patients with hepatitis B virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection has not been fully elucidated. Here we examined a patient coinfected with both viruses in whom entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus appeared. The 60-year-old Japanese male with the coinfection received antiretroviral therapy including lamivudine. The therapy initially suppressed replication of both viruses, followed by reactivation of the hepatitis B virus alone by 2 years of therapy. He subsequently received entecavir therapy in addition to the antiretroviral regimen. After entecavir administration, the hepatitis B virus DNA level was slightly reduced, but then increased after 6 months of entecavir therapy. In the sequencing analysis of hepatitis B virus, no drug resistance-associated amino acid substitutions were observed in the reverse transcriptase (rt) domain before antiretroviral therapy. The lamivudine-resistant amino acid substitutions at rt173, rt180 and rt204 were detected before entecavir administration, and further the entecavir-resistant rt202 substitution was observed after 6 months of entecavir therapy. The full-length hepatitis B sequences showed that the viral strain derived from the patient belonged to genotype H. In summary, this report describes a patient with hepatitis B virus/human immunodeficiency virus coinfection who received entecavir therapy in addition to an antiretroviral regimen and showed the early emergence of entecavir-resistance hepatitis B virus. In entecavir therapy for patients infected with both viruses, great care should be taken with respect to the emergence of entecavir-resistant hepatitis B virus, especially in patients with pre-existing lamivudine-resistant virus.

Primary resistance, multidrug resistance, and cross-resistance pathways in HBV as a consequence of treatment failure

Antiviral resistance is now the single most important factor in treatment failure using nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA). Primary drug resistance mutations refer to amino acid change(s) that result in reduced susceptibility to an antiviral agent. Secondary compensatory mutations restore replication defects associated with primary drug resistance and may be associated with low level reduced susceptibility. Several evolutionary pathways of drug resistant HBV have been observed in patients treated with NAs. It is possible that the drug resistance mutations selected with one agent may affect the efficacy of other NAs. Several major HBV-evolutionary NA-resistance pathways (rtM204I/V, rtN236T and rtA181T/V) have now been characterised. The rtM204V/I pathway is responsible for resistance to the L: -nucleosides, such as lamivudine (LMV), telbivudine (LdT) and clevudine (CLD), and also entecavir (ETV), whilst the rtN236T pathway is responsible for adefovir (ADV) and tenofovir (TFV) resistance. Both pathways are associated with clusters of secondary mutations that can affect subsequent treatment with NAs (rtT184G, rtS202I) such as ETV. The third pathway, rtA181T/V, is associated with resistance to LMV and ADV and is a potential multi-drug resistance pathway and will probably have an impact on TFV sensitivity, either alone or with the rtN236T. In naïve patients treated with ETV, atleast three mutations arising at the same time are required: rtL180M + rtM204V plus either one of rtT184, rtS202 or rtM250 codon changes. Finally, in highly drug-experienced patients, clusters of mutations such as rtA181T/I233V/N236T/M250L, all on the one dominant HBV genome, are being detected which are associated with multi-drug resistance. Sequential treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) promotes multidrug resistance. It is likely, therefore, that development of multi-drug resistance could be reduced by combination therapy optimised to individual viral phenotypes.