Hepatitis B escape mutant reactivation in a renal transplant patient

Hepatitis B virus subgenotype F3 reactivation with vaccine escape mutations: A case report and review of the literature

Hepatitis B represents a global health threat because its chronic course and sequelae contribute to a high morbidity and mortality. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be controlled by vaccines, antiviral treatment, and by interrupting transmission. Rare vaccine escape mutants are serious because they eliminate vaccine protection. Here, we present a 74-year-old vaccinated patient with HBV reactivation 11 years after kidney transplantation. The patient was HBV-positive but HBsAg-negative prior to vaccination 6 years before transplantation. The reactivated virus was HBV genotype F3 with vaccine escape mutations G145R, P120Q, and Q129P. The patient was successfully treated with entecavir. The epidemiological reasons for this subgenotype, which is extremely rare in Western Europe, were unclear. This case illustrates that second-generation vaccines are not always effective in a specific group of patients.

Pitfall of hepatitis B surface antigen testing in a kidney transplant recipient presenting hepatitis B reactivation

Diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) detection can be hampered in the setting of HBV reactivation in immunocompromized patients with prior serology indicating past cured infection, and can be associated with severe or fulminant and fatal hepatitis. We present a case of HBV reactivation in a renal transplant patient in whom HBsAg failed to be confirmed as a true positive result. One year after transplantation, systematic testing showed HBsAg positivity with a titer at 244 pg/mL, anti-hepatitis B core antibody and concurrent anti-hepatitis B surface antibody positivity. Confirmation of HBsAg detection by seroneutralization did not confirm HBsAg positivity, indicating that HBsAg detection was a false positive result. Notwithstanding, HBV DNA titer in serum was concurrently 8.6 Log IU/mL. HBV DNA sequencing showed a genotype D and several amino acid substitutions within HBsAg, including some previously involved in impaired diagnosis and altered immunogenicity. Although no perturbation of liver biochemical markers was observed, treatment with tenofovir was introduced. One month later, HBV DNA level had decreased by 2.6 Log IU/mL and no clinical and biochemical symptoms of hepatitis had occurred. The present case underlines that serologic diagnosis of HBV reactivation can be tricky in transplant recipients with a prior serology indicating past HBV infection. This prompts to perform HBV DNA testing in case of positive HBsAg testing, regardless of the result of neutralization by anti-HBs antibodies.