Autologous platelet-rich plasma treatment for patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized studies

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) in diabetes foot disease: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study will explore the effectiveness of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of diabetic foot disease compared to conventional treatments, based on the ulcer healing rate.

METHODS

The electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and WOS internet were searched. Evaluated outcome rate of complete ulcer healing. Statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.0 software and SPSS 25.0.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 828 patients were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed a higher complete ulcer healing rate (OR = 3.69, 95 % CI 2.62 to 5.20, P < 0.01, I2 = 0 %) in growth factors based in autologous platelech-rich plasma (aPRP) group compared with control. Mixed evidence was seen for publication bias, but analyses by using the trim-and-fill method did not appreciably alter results.

CONCLUSION

Autologous platelet-rich plasma can improve the complete healing rate of the ulcer compared to current conventional treatments in diabetic foot ulcer patients.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of venous ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Considering the substantial impact of venous ulcers on quality of life and healthcare systems, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in comparison to conventional therapy. A systematic review of four databases identified 16 randomized clinical trials, including 20 study groups. PRP significantly enhanced complete ulcer healing, exhibiting an odds ratio (OR) of 5.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35-10.89), and increased the percentage of healed ulcer area by a mean difference of 47% (95% CI: 32%-62%). Additionally, PRP shortened the time required for complete healing by an average of 3.25 months (95% CI: -4.06 to -2.43). Although pain reduction was similar in both groups, PRP considerably decreased ulcer recurrence rates (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05-0.50) without increasing the risks of infection or irritative dermatitis. These results suggest PRP as a viable, safe alternative for venous ulcer treatment, providing significant improvements in healing outcomes.

Genome-wide screening of m6A profiling of cutaneous wound healing in diabetic mice

OBJECTIVE

Impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major health burden on patients, their families, and society. The present study aimed to systematically profile the m6A modification landscape in cutaneous wounds in a diabetic mouse model.

APPROACH

Diabetes was induced in mice through a single intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ); a single intraperitoneal injection of PBS was made in control mice for comparisons. Both groups then received an 8-mm diameter, full-thickness dorsal body wound with a biopsy punch. Five days after wound surgery, western blot analysis of harvested wound tissues from both groups was used to assess the expression of m6A-related enzymes. Genome-wide profiling of m6A-tagged transcripts was performed through MeRIP-seq and RNA-seq.

RESULTS

ALKBH5, an m6A eraser, was significantly upregulated, while METTL3, METTL14, and WTAP, m6A writers, were markedly downregulated in the diabetic wounds. Additionally, a total of 1335 m6A peaks were differentially expressed in MeRIP-seq and RNA-seq analyses, with 558 upregulated and 777 downregulated peaks. Finally, there was hypomethylated and hypermethylated differentiation at the gene and transcript levels.

INNOVATION

The present study was the first to reveal the m6A landscape in diabetic wounds in an animal model.

CONCLUSION

This study, by deeply analyzing the role of m6A modifications in diabetic wound healing, provides new insights and understanding into the molecular mechanisms of diabetic wound healing. Future research could further explore how m6A modifications regulate the wound healing process, thereby offering new potential targets for the treatment of diabetic wounds.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The probiological healing effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) during tissue repair has recently gathered much attention. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) receiving PRP or conventional treatment to evaluate their efficacy.

METHODS

PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were comprehensively searched by 2 independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines for the inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PRP with conventional treatments for DFUs. The primary measurements of healing rate and healing time, the methodological quality and extracted data were assessed using Review Manager 5.3. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 10 RCTs involving 550 patients were included in this study, PRP was observed to significantly improve the healing rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.82, P = 0.02) and shorten the healing time (mean difference [MD] = -23.23, 95% CI -45.97 to -0.49, P = 0.05) of patients with DFU when compared to the conventional treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional treatment, PRP effectively promoted the healing of patients with DFU by evidently improving the healing rate and healing time.

Efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma (au-PRP) for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) treatment.

METHOD

We conducted database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, evidence-based medicine reviews: CENTRAL, PubMed, and Web of Science) and reference mining for randomised controlled trials from inception to 23 January 2022. Results were scrutinised, data were extracted and research quality was investigated by two independent authors. Primary outcome was the proportion of complete ulcer healing. Secondary outcomes included both the mean time to complete healing and the incidence of adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed in RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane, UK). Kaplan-Meier curves for time to complete healing were pooled in R software (version 4.1.2) (R Foundation, Austria).

RESULTS

Of the 231 records identified, 17 studies with a total of 1303 participants (649 randomised to the au-PRP group and 654 to a standard of care (SOC) group) met the eligibility criteria and were included in our study. Compared with SOC, au-PRP appeared to promote the complete healing rate (odds ratio (OR): 2.11; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.55-2.86). Au-PRP also appeared to significantly shorten complete healing time (mean duration: -19.04 days; 95%CI: -20.46--17.61]). There was no significant difference on adverse events. Results were robust on sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Based on the findings of this review and meta-analysis, Au-PRP is an effective and safe adjuvant therapy for DFUs.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review

Background

With the increasing incidence of diabetes, diabetic foot ulcer(DFU) has become one of the most common and serious complications in people with diabetes. DFU is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and can also result in significant economic, social and public health burdens. Due to peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, hyperglycemic environment, inflammatory disorders and other factors, the healing of DFU is impaired or delayed, resulting in the formation of diabetic chronic refractory ulcer. Because of these pathological abnormalities in DFU, it may be difficult to promote wound healing with conventional therapies or antibiotics, whereas platelet-rich plasma(PRP) can promote wound healing by releasing various bioactive molecules stored in platelets, making it more promising than traditional antibiotics. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to summarize and analyze the efficacy of PRP in the treatment of DFU.

Methods

A literature search was undertaken in PubMed, CNKI, EMB-ASE, the Cochrane Library, the WanFang Database and the WeiPu Database by computer. Included controlled studies evaluating the efficacy of PRP in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The data extraction and assessment are on the basis of PRISMA.

Results

Twenty studies were evaluated, and nineteen measures for the evaluation of the efficacy of PRP in DFU treatment were introduced by eliminating relevant duplicate measures. The efficacy measures that were repeated in various studies mainly included the rate of complete ulcer healing, the percentage of ulcer area reduction, the time required for ulcer healing, wound complications (including infection rate, amputation rate, and degree of amputation), the rate of ulcer recurrence, and the cost and duration of hospitalization for DFU, as well as subsequent survival and quality of life scores. One of the most important indicators were healing rate, ulcer area reduction and healing time. The meta-analysis found that PRP was significantly improve the healing rate(OR = 4.37, 95% CI 3.02-6.33, P < 0.001) and shorten the healing time(MD = -3.21, 95% CI -3.83 to -2.59,P < 0.001)of patients with DFU when compared to the conventional treatment, but there was no significant difference in reducing the of ulcer area(MD = 5.67, 95% CI -0.77 to 12.11,P =0.08>0.05 ).

Conclusion

The application of PRP to DFU can improve ulcer healing rate and shorten ulcer healing time, but more clinical data are needed to clarify some efficacy measures. At the same time, a standardized preparation process for PRP is essential.

Application of antibiotic bone cement in the treatment of infected diabetic foot ulcers in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

In this study, we try to investigate the effect of antibiotic bone cement in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study, including fifty-two patients with infected DFU who had undergone treated between June 2019 and May 2021. Patients were divided into Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) group and control group. 22 patients in PMMA group received antibiotic bone cement and regular wound debridement, and 30 patients in control group received regular wound debridement. Clinical outcomes include the rate of wound healing, duration of healing, duration of wound preparation, rate of amputation, and frequency of debridement procedures.

RESULTS

In PMMA group, twenty-two patients (100%) had complete wound healing. In control group, twenty-eight patients (93.3%) had wound healing. Compared with control group, PMMA group had fewer frequencies of debridement procedures and shorter duration of wound healing (35.32 ± 3.77 days vs 44.37 ± 7.44 days, P < 0.001). PMMA group had five minor amputation, while control group had eight minor amputation and two major amputation. Regarding the rate of limb salvage, there was no limb lose in PMMA group and two limb losses in control group.

CONCLUSION

The application of antibiotic bone cement is an effective solution for infected DFU treatment. It can effectively decreased the frequency of debridement procedures and shorten the healing duration in patients with infected DFU.

The role of allogeneic platelet-rich plasma in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: Current perspectives and future challenges

The frequency of chronic cutaneous wounds are sharply increasing in aging populations. Patients with age-related diseases, such as diabetes, tumors, renal failure and stroke are prone to soft tissue and skin injury, compounded by slowed healing in aging. Imbalance of wound inflammation, loss of growth factor secretion, and impairment of tissue repair abilities are all possible reasons for failed healing. Therefore, it is vital to explore novel approaches to accelerate wound healing. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a cell therapy has been widely applied for tissue repair and regeneration. PRP promotes wound healing by releasing antimicrobial peptides, growth factors and micro-RNAs. Medical evidence indicates that autologous platelet-rich plasma (au-PRP) can promote wound healing effectively, safely and rapidly. However, its clinical application is usually restricted to patients with chronic cutaneous wounds, generally because of other severe complications and poor clinical comorbidities. Allogeneic platelet-rich plasma (al-PRP), with abundant sources, has demonstrated its superiority in the field of chronic wound treatment. Al-PRP could overcome the limitations of au-PRP and has promising prospects in clinical applications. The aim of this review is to summarize the current status and future challenges of al-PRP in chronic cutaneous wound management. We also summarized clinical cases to further describe the application of al-PRP for chronic wounds in clinical practice.

Effect of platelet-rich plasma vs standard management for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer wounds: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of platelet-rich plasma vs standard management for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer wounds. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was performed and 1435 subjects with diabetic foot ulcer wounds at the baseline of the studies; 723 of them were treated with platelet-rich plasma, and 712 used control. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to assess the effect of platelet-rich plasma vs standard management for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer wounds using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. The use of autologous platelet-rich plasma resulted in significantly higher complete-healed diabetic foot ulcer wounds compared with control (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.49-2.56, P < 0.001). The use of allogeneic platelet-rich plasma resulted in significantly higher complete-healed diabetic foot ulcer wounds compared with control (OR, 6.19; 95% CI, 2.32-16.56, P < 0.001). The use of autologous and allogeneic platelet-rich plasma resulted in significantly higher complete-healed diabetic foot ulcer wounds compared with control. Though, the analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low number of studies in certain comparisons, for example, allogeneic platelet-rich plasma compared with control.

Repairing Effect of Platelet Enriched Plasma on Tendon Healing

To explore the repairing effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on tendon (AT) healing, and provide evidence for PRP therapy to treat tendon-related diseases, 32 New Zealand white rabbits were selected to construct tendinopathy animal model. Leukocyte-rich Platelet-Rich Fibrin (Lr-PRP) and Leukocyte-poor Platelet-Rich Fibrin (Lp-PRP) were prepared, whose biological effects on tendon stem cells (TSCs) were explored. Rabbits were divided into control group, low, medium, and high dose groups regrading concentration of Lp-PRP. The number of fibroblasts, collagen fiber content, tubuloglomerular feedback-β1 (TGF-β1) expression, and biomechanical properties were compared at 15 and 30 days after operation. The results showed that Collagen-III (CoI-III) protein expression levels, interleukin-β (IL-β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in the Lp-PRP group were significantly higher than Lr-PRP group (P < 0.05). Fibroblasts and collagen fibers in group II and III were significantly higher versus group C 15 and 30 days after operation (P < 0.05). Fibroblasts and of collagen fibers in group III were significantly higher versus group II (P < 0.05). Expression of TGF-β1 in groups II and III was significantly higher than that in group C 15 days after operation (P < 0.05). Tensile load of AT repair site in group III was significantly higher than group C 30 days after operation (P < 0.05). Platelet plasma concentration had a certain repair effect on tendon injury and can effectively improve the quality of healing. In addition, Lp-PRP was better than Lr-PRP in tissue healing. When the concentration of Lp-PRP was 100%, the repair effect was the best.

Novel therapeutic targets for diabetes-related wounds or ulcers: an update on preclinical and clinical research

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes-related wounds, particularly diabetes-related foot ulcers, are mainly caused by lack of foot sensation and high plantar tissue stress secondary to peripheral neuropathy, ischemia secondary to peripheral artery disease, and dysfunctional wound healing. Current management of diabetes-related wounds involves the offloading of high foot pressures and the treatment of ischemia through revascularization. Despite these treatments, the global burden of diabetes-related wounds is growing, and thus, novel therapies are needed. The normal wound healing process is a coordinated remodeling process orchestrated by fibroblasts, endothelial cells, phagocytes, and platelets, controlled by an array of growth factors. In diabetes-related wounds, these coordinated processes are dysfunctional. The past animal model and human research suggest that prolonged wound inflammation, failure to adequately correct ischemia, and impaired wound maturation are key therapeutic targets to improve diabetes-related wound healing.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes recent preclinical and clinical research on novel diabetes-related wound treatments. Animal models of diabetes-related wounds and recent studies testing novel therapeutic agents in these models are described. Findings from clinical trials are also discussed. Finally, challenges to identifying and implementing novel therapies are described.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the growing volume of promising drug therapies currently under investigation, it is expected within the next decade, that diabetes-related wound treatment will be transformed.

Clinical therapeutic effects of platelet-rich plasma in patients with burn wound healing: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In clinical settings, burn wounds are frequently encountered. Since burn wounds are a form of physical injury, they can have long-term adverse effects on the human body. It has been a significant challenge to treat burn wounds completely. Since traditional treatment strategies have been unable to heal burn wounds completely, they lack the efficacy to cure the wounds without long-term effects, such as heavy scarring. Reportedly, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown potential to accelerate wound healing. Yet, there are no conclusive reports on a methodological comparative study of research that has assessed the medical benefits of PRP for treating individuals carrying burn wounds. Thus, the present meta-analysis and systematic study aims to assess the medical benefits of PRP for treating patients carrying burn wounds.

METHODS

The authors will conduct a comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials that evaluate the safeness and efficiency of PRP to treat burn wounds. The search includes 3 Chinese language databases (WanFang database, Chinese BioMedical Literature database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and 4 English language databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE). These electronic databases will be searched from their establishment till May 2021. A pair of independent authors will be selecting eligible studies for extracting data. The same authors will employ the Cochrane risk of bias tool to evaluate the bias risk. We will make use of RevMan (version: 5.3) software to complete data synthesis.

RESULTS

The present protocol will establish practical and targeted results evaluating the efficacy and safeness of using PRP to treat burn wounds. The current study also provides a reference for clinical use of PRP.

CONCLUSION

Stronger evidence about the effectiveness and safety of using PRP to treat and heal burn wounds will be provided for clinicians to refer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is unrequired.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

March 31, 2021.osf.io/whauj. (https://osf.io/whauj/).

Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma in treating patients with burn wounds: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Burns are still regarded among severe health problems related to high morbidity and mortality rates globally. In essence, health problems associated with burns can cause significant economic burden to society. Regardless of treatment available options, no best treatment was considered adequate for treating severe burns. In particular, only a few studies have focused on the effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma to treat burn wounds. The present study aim to systematically review existing literature to examine the effectiveness and safety of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to treat burn wounds.

METHODS

For this study, we will conduct a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, as well as Scopus to discover randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the examination of effectiveness and safety of autologous PRP to treat burn wounds from their inception to March 2021 with no language restrictions. Additionally, we will search Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as the reference lists of studies considered in the research to ascertain possibly eligible studies. We used two independent authors to evaluate studies for inclusion and conduct data extraction. We intend to assess study bias and quality utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Also, we will pool study results using the fixed-effects model or random-effects model. Finally, any disagreements emanating from the process will be addressed through discussion or using a third author to mediate situations leading to disagreement.

RESULTS

The study aims at assessing the effectiveness and safety of autologous PRP for treating burn wounds.

CONCLUSION

The study will provide specific substantiation to assess autologous PRP's effectiveness and safety in treating patients with burn wounds.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study does not require ethical approval since no published studies are used in it.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

March 29, 2021.osf.io/74z5u. (https://osf.io/74z5u/).