Are Geriatric Patients Placed in an Emergency Department Observation Unit on a Chest Pain Pathway More Likely Than Non-Geriatric Patients to Re-Present to the Hospital within 30 Days?

Predictive Factors and Risk Assessment for Hospitalization in Chest Pain Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits. Patients presenting with inconclusive symptoms complicate the diagnostic process and add to the burden upon the ED. This study aimed to determine factors possibly influencing ED decisions on hospitalization versus discharge for patients with the diagnosis of chest pain.

METHODS

In the cohort study including 400 patients admitted to the emergency unit with a working diagnosis of chest pain, data on demographics, medical history, symptoms, lab results, and risk scores were collected from the medical records of patients admitted to the ED with a working diagnosis of chest pain. To reduce potential bias, the analysis was restricted to 330 patients who were referred to the ED by a primary care provider or clinic for chest pain.

RESULTS

Of 330 patients admitted to the ED, 58.5% were discharged, and 41.5% were hospitalized. Hospitalized patients were significantly older, with a median age of 70 versus 57 years for those discharged (p < 0.001). A higher proportion of hospitalizations occurred during the late-night shift. Significant predictors of hospitalization included hyperlipidemia (OR 3.246), diaphoresis (OR 8.525), dyspnea (OR 2.897), and hypertension (OR 1.959). Nursing home residents had a lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.381). The area under the ROC curve for this model was 0.801 (95% CI: 0.753-0.848), indicating the predictive accuracy of the model in estimating the probability of admission. The HEART (history, ECG, age, risk factors, and troponin level) score was more effective than the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) score in predicting the need for hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.807 compared to 0.742 for TIMI.

CONCLUSIONS

The HEART score in comparison with TIMI score proved especially valuable for quick risk assessment for hospitalization. The model that included hyperlipidemia, diaphoresis, dyspnea, and hypertension was the most predictive for the risk of hospitalization. Further research with larger populations is needed to validate these findings.

The Value Proposition of Observation Medicine in Managing Acute Oncologic Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite recommended best practice guidelines, pain remains an ongoing but undertreated symptom in patients with cancer, many of whom require emergency department evaluation for acute oncologic pain. A significant proportion of these patients are hospitalized for pain management, which increases healthcare costs and exposes patients to the risks of hospitalization. We reviewed the literature on observation medicine: an emerging mode of healthcare delivery which can offer patients with acute pain access to a hospital's pain management solutions and specialists without an inpatient hospitalization. Specifically, we appraised the role of observation medicine in acute pain management and its financial implications in order to consider its potential impact on the management of acute oncologic pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence shows that observation medicine has the potential to decrease short-stay hospitalizations in cancer patients presenting with various concerns, including pain. Observation medicine is reported to be successful in providing comprehensive and cost-effective care for non-cancer patients with acute pain, making it a promising alternative to short-stay hospitalizations for cancer patients with acute oncologic pain.

The efficacy and safety of evaluating elderly patients using a comprehensive diagnostic protocol via a chest pain unit

Elderly patients are often excluded from a chest pain unit (CPU)-based evaluation of chest pain due to concern about adverse events and poorer outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of thoroughly evaluating elderly patients ≥ 65 years of age presented with acute chest pain via a CPU. We evaluated 1220 consecutive patients admitted to our CPU, and stratified them according to age: those over and those under 65 years. Patients were evaluated for outcomes during hospitalization and for a composite endpoint at 60 days post discharge which included: recurrent hospitalization due to chest pain, need for coronary revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and death. Overall, 241 (20%) patients were in the ≥ 65-year-old group and 979 (80%) patients in the group < 65 years of age. Older patients were more likely to be female, have more co-morbidities, and a history of prior coronary artery disease. There was no difference between the two groups regarding in-hospital course, including hospitalization in the CPU (9.5% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.37), coronary angiography (7.9% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.37), and revascularization performed during the evaluation period (4.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.42). Of those discharged, the primary endpoint at 60 days was observed in 11 (1.5%) and 7 (3.9%) patients in those under and over 65 years, respectively, (p = 0.13). No mortalities were recorded. Comprehensive evaluation via a CPU of patients who are ≥ 65 years of age is feasible and safe with in-hospital and short-term outcomes compared to their younger counterparts.

Emergency Department Observation Unit Utilization Among Older Patients With Chest Pain

BACKGROUND

Although some emergency department observation units (EDOUs) may exclude patients over 65 years old, our EDOU accepts patients up to 79 years old. We assessed the utilization of our EDOU by older patients (those 65-79 years old).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. We gathered baseline data at the time of ED presentation and tracked outcomes related to the ED stay, EDOU, and/or inpatient admission. Our primary outcome included EDOU placement among older patients. Our secondary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiac events [MACE: myocardial infarction, stent, coronary artery bypass graft, and death].

RESULTS

Over the 5-year study period, we evaluated 2242 ED patients with chest pain, of whom 19.4% (95% confidence interval, 17.8%-21.1%) were 65-79 years old. Older patients were more likely to be placed in the EDOU after the ED visit (45.8% vs. 36.6%; P = 0.001) and more likely to be admitted to an inpatient unit from the ED (31.8% vs. 17.9%;P < 0.001) than those under 65 years old. The overall MACE rate was similar between admitted older patients and those in the EDOU: 5.9% versus 4.3% (P = 0.57). Of the admitted older patients, 30.4% (95% confidence interval, 22.3%-39.9%) were low risk and there were no cases of MACE in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

In an EDOU that allows older patients, we noted substantial utilization by these patients for the evaluation of chest pain. The characteristics of admitted older patients suggest the potential for even greater EDOU utilization in this group.