Estimating source terms for far field dredge plume modelling

Risk assessment of e-waste - Liquid Crystal Monomers re-suspension caused by coastal dredging operations

The Pearl River Estuary (PRE), one of the primary e-waste recycling centers in the world, has been suffering from the pollution of Liquid Crystal Monomers (LCMs), critical materials with persistent, bio-accumulative, and toxic substances used in electronic devices. It has been detected in seabed sediment with both high frequency and concentration near PRE - Hong Kong (HK) waters. In the same area, dredging operations with in-situ sediment have been frequently used in the last decades for coastal land reclamation projects. Dredging is known to cause a huge amount of sediment re-suspension into water columns, with potential damage to marine ecosystems and biodiversity. In this study, we proposed a new risk assessment strategy to estimate the secondary pollution due to the re-suspension sediment highly contaminated by LCMs. We formulate a robust and reliable probabilistic approach based on unsupervised machine learning and hydrodynamic and sediment transport numerical simulation. New risk indexes were also proposed to better quantify the impact of contaminated sediments. We applied the methodology to assess the potential impact of dredging operations in the PRE and Hong Kong waters on the local marine ecosystem. The results of the analysis showed how the potentially contaminated areas depended on the dredging locations.

The forgotten ones of ports: The filter feeders at the heart of siltation processes

Siltation is a major concern in dynamic and complex ecosystems, such as ports. The mud must be regularly dredged to avoid disturbing the navigation channels. Sediments are carried by the waters entering the port and are partially trapped by harbour structures. Numerous studies have been conducted on the physical factors influencing siltation in port areas, whereas, few have focused on the role of biotic factors in mud formation. However, research in other contexts has shown that organisms that are abundant in pontoons, such as bivalves and tunicates, play an important role in this siltation process. All of these organisms belong to the filter feeder group. The sediments sucked in by the filter feeders are excreted in the form of faeces or mucus-bound pseudo-faeces. These waste materials, called bioproducts, settle efficiently and are involved in the composition of the mud. This study aimed to highlight the role of filter feeders in the siltation process in port areas and to determine the factors that influence the production of bioproducts by filter feeders. To investigate the role of filter feeders in the siltation processes, an experimental analysis was conducted in the largest marina in Europe (La Rochelle, France). It is divided into four basins with distinct filter feeder communities and environmental conditions, allowing for a detailed study of the environmental factors that influence the production of bioproducts. This analysis consisted of recovering and studying the bioproducts generated by the filter feeders using sediment traps fixed under pontoons. To explore the evolution of this biological production, 16 campaigns were conducted from January to March 2020 and May to July 2020. The total amount of dry matter produced was constant between seasons at approximately 130 g/m²/d; marina-wide, this amount represents a total daily production of 3.2 tons. However, the production amount varies spatially and temporally in relation to marine hydrodynamics and the organisms involved. Bioproduction was taxon-dependent: areas abundant in oysters and mussels were the areas with the most pronounced bioproduction, whereas there was no significant relationship between bioproduction and the presence of tunicates or scallops. If we consider bioproduction on a seasonal scale, we can see that the campaigns with the greatest production correspond to the periods when the sediment supply was the highest, i.e. when the tidal range was the highest. The quality of the bioproducts (organic matter content) differed between seasons, which can be explained by both environmental and metabolic changes. Understanding the role of filter feeders in siltation processes appears to be essential in port environments that need to be regularly dredged to ensure safe navigation.

Sediment management in coastal infrastructures: Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of alternative technologies to dredging

The presence of anthropic activity in the coastal or riverine environment modifies the wave as well as the water and sediment current regime. In particular, the body of water around ports is an area where intense currents and sediment transport rates are usually present and can be affected by low water velocities that take place close to the entrance and inside the port basin. Consequently, sediment can be entrained and accumulated in such areas, creating problems to navigation. Ports and moorings are filled with fine sediments due to deposition resulting from solid transport. In particular, silt particles settle because of the weak vertical and lateral shearing of the velocity field. The result is that harbours frequently require ordinary maintenance dredging. The dredging process involves the removal of sediment in its natural deposited condition by using either mechanical or hydraulic equipment. Dredging is a consolidated and proven technology, but involves considerable drawbacks. In particular, dredging has a notable environmental impact on marine flora and fauna, contributes to the mobility and diffusion of contaminants and pollutants already present in the silted sediments, obstructs navigation and is characterized by relatively high and low predictable costs. This paper aims to provide an original structured overview of technologies alternative to dredging that have been tested in the past 50 years. More than 150 articles have been analysed to compare standard dredging technologies with market-ready competitors from techno-economic and environmental perspectives. In particular, the paper focuses on anti-sedimentation infrastructures and on innovative plant solutions characterized by low maintenance costs and by a very limited environmental impact. The final aim of the paper is to describe the currently available technologies that prevent port inlet and channel siltation and to classify them through a techno-economic and environmental impact assessment. The comparison shows that dredging has both the higher costs and environmental impact, while fixed sand by-passing plants are characterized by the lowest environmental impact and operation costs that are competitive with dredging.

Mathematical Modeling Framework of Physical Effects Induced by Sediments Handling Operations in Marine and Coastal Areas

In recent years increasing attention has been paid to environmental effects that may result from marine dredging and disposal operations. In general, the fine-grained fraction of handled sediments can be dispersed far from the intervention site as a turbidity plume, depending on the specific site and operational parameters. Starting from a literature review, this paper suggests standards for estimating and characterizing the sediment source term, for setting up far-field modeling studies and analyzing numerical results, with the aim of optimizing, also from an economic point of view, the different project, execution and monitoring phases. The paper proposes an integrated modeling approach for simulating sediment dispersion due to sediment handling operations in different marine-coastal areas (off-shore, near-shore and semi-enclosed basins). Attention is paid to the characterization of sediment source terms due to different operational phases (removal, transport and disposal). The paper also deals with the definition of accuracy level of modeling activities, with regard to the main physical processes characterizing the different marine–coastal areas and to the type of environmental critical issues near the intervention site (if any). The main relationships between modeling and monitoring are given for the different design and management phases to support the selection of appropriate technical alternatives and monitoring actions and to ensure the environmental compliance of the proposed interventions.