Bioretention soil capacity for removing nutrients, metals, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; roles of co-contaminants, pH, salinity and dissolved organic carbon

Field performance of two stormwater bioretention systems for treating heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from urban runoff

The increasing urbanization and land development poses significant water quality challenges in urban areas. Stormwater control measures, such as bioretention basins, are implemented to mitigate these issues by managing storm volumes and improving water quality. Despite their widespread use, the effectiveness of bioretention basins in removing pollutants, particularly heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), remains unclear. This study evaluates the treatment efficiency of two stormwater bioretention basins (Kyle and TPC) situated within the critical Edwards Aquifer recharge zone in Texas. Over a 1-year period, influent and effluent samples were collected and analyzed to assess removal of heavy metals and PAHs. Soil samples were also collected to assess the distribution of metals in basin soil. The results reveal significant differences in removal efficiency for Fe, Cu, and Zn between the two basins. Within Kyle, there was a significant load reduction of Fe (77%), Cr (74%), and Cu (65%). Within TPC, a significant load reduction was observed for Fe (68%), Cu (84%), and Zn (82%). The results from soil samples indicated significant difference between summer and winter samples for Fe, Mg, Zn and Pb in Kyle while Pb was the only metal that significantly varied between seasons in TPC samples. The high molecular weight PAHs detected in TPC suggested that the sources likely originated from industrial and transportation activities. These results carry significant implications for the operation and maintenance protocols governing such basins, necessitating careful consideration of their impact on groundwater quality and the broader ecosystem.

Interactions of particulate- and dissolved-phase heavy metals in a mature stormwater bioretention cell

Bioretention is an increasingly common stormwater control measure (SCM) for mitigation of stormwater quantity and quality. Studies from lab to field scale have shown successful removal of total metals from stormwater, especially Cu and Zn which are ubiquitous in the urban environment yet detrimental to aquatic ecosystems. While bioretention effectively removes particulate matter and particulate bound (PB) contaminants, removal performance of dissolved metals has been neglected in field studies. After approximately two decades of these systems being implemented, with a typical design-life of 20 years, performance of mature systems is unknown. This study examined the performance of a 16- to 18-year-old bioretention cell by characterizing Cu and Zn partitioning and removal. Flow-weighted composite samples of stormwater and bioretention effluent were collected and analyzed for total and dissolved metals. Size-fractioned road-deposited sediments (RDS) were collected and analyzed for metals and particle size distribution. The comparison of RDS and PB metals showed that PB-Zn was enriched in stormwater, indicating higher mobility of PB-Zn compared to PB-Cu. The mature bioretention system effectively removed particulates and PB-metals with average load reductions of 82% and 83%, respectively. While concentrations for dissolved metals were low (<40 μg/L), no significant difference between influent and effluent was observed. Effluent concentrations of total and dissolved Cu, total organic carbon, and particulates were not significantly different from those measured over 10 years ago at the site, while total Zn effluent concentration slightly increased. MINTEQ speciation modeling showed that Cu was approximately 100% bound with dissolved organic matter (DOM) in all bioretention effluent. While Zn was also mostly bound with DOM in effluent, some events showed free ionic Zn reaching concentrations in the same order of magnitude. Media amendments, maintenance, and monitoring of SCMs should be considered where further removal of dissolved metals is necessary for the protection of aquatic environments.

Evaluation of sorbent amendments used with stormwater management practices to remove contaminants: Impacts of rainfall intensity and antecedent dry periods

For a comprehensive evaluation of the suitability and efficiency of soil amendments in bioretention systems, it is crucial to investigate the capability of amendments for simultaneously serving three important functions under intermittent and variable flow conditions: removing a wide range of contaminants, supporting plant health, and maintaining media infiltration rate. However, most studies have not considered these important factors and conditions simultaneously, which may overestimate or underestimate the bioretention performance. In this study, a long-term vegetated column study was conducted to investigate the ability of various sorbent amendments- coconut coir fiber (CCF), blast furnace slag (BFS), and waste tire crumb rubber (WTCR) -for removal of metals, nutrients, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from stormwater. The experiments were performed under intermittent flow conditions considering different runoff intensities and antecedent dry periods (ADP). The long-term effect of bioretention usage on plant health and media infiltration rate was also investigated. All amended and unamended columns were able to remove >99 % of influent metals, except Cu, over the 7-month experiment period with different rain intensities and dry periods; modest effluent Cu concentrations occurred with higher rainfall. The performance of different media for removing PAHs such as naphthalene and acenaphthylene varied with the rain intensity. The BFS-amended media had high phosphate removal capacity (>90 %) under tested conditions. In all columns, nitrate removal was notably affected by changes in stormwater intensity and ADP, with high nitrate removal during heavy rainfall. Over the entire experiment, all media had good infiltration rate within the locally acceptable range (1-25 cm/h). The high iron and aluminum contents of BFS adversely affected the plant health in BFS-amended media. Overall, this study identifies the opportunities and challenges associated with the usage of bioretention amendments, and improves awareness among bioretention designers to consider seasonal effect on the performance of bioretention systems.

Green engineered mulch for phosphorus and metal removal from stormwater runoff in bioretention systems

Phosphorus and metals in stormwater runoff are major causes of water quality degradation. Bioretention systems are increasingly implemented to improve stormwater quality and to better manage stormwater quantity. Many studies have focused on modifying the composition of the soil bed to improve pollutant removal. However, the pollutant removal performance of bioretention systems can diminish over time, such as when clogging of the media occurs. Sediment accumulation on the soil surface may inhibit infiltration into the soil bed, thus limiting pollutant removal. Soil replacement may be eventually required as pollutants accumulate in the soil. In this study, a green retrofit material, called green engineered mulch (GEM), was generated by coating regular wood mulch with aluminum-based water treatment residuals (WTR) via a simple and low-energy process (patent pending). The GEM was developed to serve as a green retrofit for bioretention systems to enhance the removal of phosphorus and metals from stormwater runoff. The GEM was placed in a rain garden in Secaucus, NJ, USA for 15 months, during which 12 storm events (ranging from 6.0 mm to 89.6 mm) were monitored. Runoff and infiltrate samples were analyzed for dissolved and total concentrations of phosphorus and metals, along with other key water quality parameters. The GEM significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the total concentrations of phosphorus and metals in stormwater infiltrate compared to the inlet, unlike the regular mulch. Minimal or no contact with the GEM resulted in no significant pollutant removal from surface runoff. No significant pollutant export from the GEM was observed. The spent GEM can be disposed of as non-hazardous waste in municipal landfills. This study demonstrates that the GEM is a safe and effective retrofit. Moreover, the GEM is a simple and economical retrofit solution that can be used in place of regular mulch in bioretention systems.