1
|
Tang L, Qian S, Wan R, Lv S, Li J, Zhang J, Shuai W, Qi S, Wang P, Qu J, Chu Y. Synergistic effects of air pollutants and CO 2 at Chinese thermal power plants based on real-monitored data. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 388:125900. [PMID: 40449427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Revised: 05/13/2025] [Accepted: 05/18/2025] [Indexed: 06/03/2025]
Abstract
The thermal power industry is a major anthropogenic source of emissions in China, significantly contributing to the release of carbon dioxide (CO2) and air pollutants. This study evaluated emission reduction potential under various scenarios by establishing the latest, real-monitored, and unit-level emissions database of particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and CO2 for Chinese thermal power industry during 2021-2023. The results indicate that, during 2022-2023, the concentrations of PM, SO2, NOx, and CO2 decreased by 1.40 %, 0.83 %, 0.94 %, and 36.93 %, respectively. However, these reductions were insufficient to offset the impact of increased fuel consumption, leading to a rise in emissions of PM, SO2, NOx, and CO2 by 21.42 %, 13.43 %, 17.49 %, and 5.28 %, respectively. In 2023, the national average Synergy Indices for CO2-PM, CO2-SO2, and CO2-NOx were only 0.02, 0.01, and 0.01, indicating weak synergistic effects between CO2 and air pollutant. This low coordination level is mainly caused by the continued implementation of separate and uncoordinated management frameworks for carbon and air pollutants in most provinces. Furthermore, clean energy substitution was identified as the most effective measure for emission reduction, with potential decreases of 66.45 %, 70.16 %, 70.43 %, and 9.80 % for PM, SO2, NOx, and CO2, respectively. This study provides a practical roadmap for the development of synergistic mitigation policies and offers valuable insights for other countries, such as India, in addressing climate change challenges within the energy sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Tang
- School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Shuangyue Qian
- School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Ruxing Wan
- School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Song Lv
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Environment Impact Assessment, Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing, 100012, China; College of Environment Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050018, China
| | - Jieyi Li
- Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China
| | - Jiaxin Zhang
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Environment Impact Assessment, Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing, 100012, China
| | - Wei Shuai
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Environment Impact Assessment, Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing, 100012, China
| | - Shuo Qi
- China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing, 100012, China
| | - Peng Wang
- College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiabao Qu
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Environment Impact Assessment, Appraisal Center for Environment and Engineering, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing, 100012, China; College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| | - Yinghao Chu
- College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cao J, Zheng B, Chen J, Liu Y. Assessment of sulfate and nitrate variations in China during 19902020: Insights into source contributions and formation pathways. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2025; 489:137600. [PMID: 39954445 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2024] [Revised: 01/25/2025] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
Sulfate (SO42-) and nitrate (NO3-) are two critical constituents of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), significantly impacting air quality and public health. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of spatial and temporal variations in SO42- and NO3- levels across China from 1990 to 2020 by using a revised Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System (CMAQ), focusing on elucidating insights into source contributions and formation pathways. The results reveal that NO3- pollution has become increasingly significant, with its concentrations surpassing those of SO42- in most regions of China since 2017. Industrial emissions were identified as the primary contributors to SO42- levels, accounting for 40.2 %57.5 % in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region (BTH), 51.0 %76.6 % in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), 46.8 %68.2 % in Pearl River Delta (PRD), 38.9 %62.8 % in Sichuan Basin (SCB), and 36.1 %58.8 % in Fenwei Plain (FWP). For NO3-, industrial emissions were predominant in BTH (27.7 %33.1 %) and YRD (31.0 %33.6 %), while transportation emissions were the major source in PRD (26.4 %36.3 %), in SCB and FWP, contributions from these sectors were comparable. The formation pathways of SO42- exhibited distinct regional variations: overall, primary emission of SO42- was the predominant pathway in BTH (23.7 %47.3 %) and YRD (24.1 %30.5 %), heterogeneous reaction dominated in SCB (23.2 %55.5 %) and FWP (20.5 %48.9 %), and aqueous-phase oxidation reaction of SO2 by H2O2 was the leading formation pathway in PRD (23.6 %32.8 %). In contrast, the formation pathways of NO3- demonstrated consistency across all regions, with combined gas-phase oxidation reaction of NO2 by OH and the heterogeneous reaction of N2O5 accounting for over 90 % of its production. This study highlights the need for targeted air quality management strategies that account for regional variations in source contributions and prioritize the reduction of key oxidants driving secondary aerosol formation. The findings could offer valuable insights for policymakers developing effective measures to mitigate air pollution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyuan Cao
- Center of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Boyue Zheng
- Institute of Strategic Planning, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China; The Center for Beautiful China, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Jiaxuan Chen
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
| | - Yang Liu
- MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ngamlana NB, Malherbe W, Gericke G, Coetzer RLJ. The effect of coal-fired power plants on ambient air quality in Mpumalanga province, South Africa, 2014-2018. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH 2025; 35:220-232. [PMID: 38711212 DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2024.2350600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Several coal-fired power plants (CFPPs) were built in South Africa, mainly in the central Mpumalanga Province, due to an increase in the demand for Eskom, the national power utility, to keep up with socio-economic growth. The CFPPs, of which 90% are owned by Eskom, generate a significant share of the country's electricity but contribute to the air pollution experienced in the country. The paper discusses sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter of size less than 10 micrometre (μm) in diameter (PM10), using data from 2014 to 2018. The statistics revealed higher PM10 concentrations during winter than in summer and spring at the Kriel and Komati sites; associated with the higher contribution of domestic burning. The study's results could influence legislation and policies and help to understand the source of poor ambient air quality by assessing the three pollutants within the area of the selected power plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N B Ngamlana
- Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - W Malherbe
- Water Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| | - G Gericke
- College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Nanotechnology & Water Sustainability Research Unit, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - R L J Coetzer
- School of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
- Focus Area for Pure and Applied Analytics, Faculty of Natural And Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang C, Niu Z, Zhang Y, Liu N, Ji X, Tian J, Guan L, Shi D, Zheng H, Gao Y, Zhao L, Zhang W, Zhang Z. Exosomal miR-129-2-3p promotes airway epithelial barrier disruption in PM 2.5-aggravated asthma. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 370:123053. [PMID: 39467462 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/30/2024]
Abstract
Particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) exposure is intricately linked to asthma exacerbations. Damage to the airway epithelial barrier function serves as an initiating factor for asthma attacks and worsening symptoms. In recent years, numerous exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for diagnosing asthma. However, the mechanisms by which PM2.5-induced exosomes exacerbate asthma remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the role of exosomal miR-129-2-3p in regulating airway epithelial cell barrier function, its potential targets, and signaling pathways involved in PM2.5-induced aggravation of asthma. In this study, miR-129-2-3p is highly expressed in plasma exosomes from patients with asthma, mouse lung tissue and plasma exosomes, and exosomes produced by PM2.5-stimulated 16HBE cells. Moreover, the exposure level of PM2.5 is positively correlated with exosomal miR-129-2-3p in plasma in patients with asthma. As the concentration of PM2.5 increases, the synthesis of connexin (ZO-1, occludin, and E-cadherin) is gradually weakened, while the content of inflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) is notably upregulated in PM2.5 exacerbated asthmatic mice. PM2.5-induced exosomes can decrease the level of connexin, enhance cell permeability and promote the secretion of inflammatory factors in 16HBE cells. TIAM1, a specific target gene for miR-129-2-3p, regulates the synthesis of connexin. Exosomal miR-129-2-3p exacerbates airway epithelial barrier dysfunction by targeted inhibition of the TIAM1/RAC1/PAK1 signaling pathway in PM2.5 aggravated asthma. In contrast, blocking miR-129-2-3p may be an alternative approach to therapeutic intervention in asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caihong Wang
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Zeyu Niu
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Nannan Liu
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Xiaotong Ji
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Jiayu Tian
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Linlin Guan
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Dongxing Shi
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Huiqiu Zheng
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Yuhui Gao
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Lifang Zhao
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Wenping Zhang
- MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China; Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| | - Zhihong Zhang
- Department of Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Shanxi Medical University, China; Center for Ecological Public Health Security of Yellow River Basin, Shanxi Medical University, China; MOE Key Laboratory of Coal Environmental Pathogenicity and Prevention, Shanxi Medical University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng Y, Cao W, Zhao H, Chen C, Lei Y, Feng Y, Qi Z, Wang Y, Wang X, Xue W, Yan G. Identifying Key Sources for Air Pollution and CO 2 Emission Co-control in China. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:15381-15394. [PMID: 39136294 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c03299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
China is confronting the dual challenges of air pollution and climate change, mandating the co-control of air pollutants and CO2 emissions from their shared sources. Here we identify key sources for co-control that prioritize the mitigation of PM2.5-related health burdens, given the homogeneous impacts of CO2 emissions from various sources. By applying an integrated analysis framework that consists of a detailed emission inventory, a chemical transport model, a multisource fused dataset, and epidemiological concentration-response functions, we systematically evaluate the contribution of emissions from 390 sources (30 provinces and 13 socioeconomic sectors) to PM2.5-related health impacts and CO2 emissions, as well as the marginal health benefits of CO2 abatement across China. The estimated source-specific contributions exhibit substantial disparities, with the marginal benefits varying by 3 orders of magnitude. The rural residential, transportation, metal, and power and heating sectors emerge as pivotal sources for co-control, with regard to their relatively large marginal benefits or the sectoral total benefits. In addition, populous and heavily industrialized provinces such as Shandong and Henan are identified as the key regions for co-control. Our study highlights the significance of incorporating health benefits into formulating air pollution and carbon co-control strategies for improving the overall social welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixuan Zheng
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Wenxin Cao
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
- College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Hongyan Zhao
- Center for Atmospheric Environmental Studies, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
| | - Chuchu Chen
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
- Center of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Yu Lei
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Yueyi Feng
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Zhulin Qi
- College of Environmental & Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Yihao Wang
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Xianen Wang
- Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
- College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
| | - Wenbo Xue
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
- Center of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| | - Gang Yan
- State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Co-control, Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning, Beijing 100041, China
| |
Collapse
|