1
|
Li Y, Luo D, Li T, Ding H, Liu Y. The cumulative live birth rate and cost-effectiveness of the clomiphene and gonadotropin cotreatment protocol versus the mid-luteal GnRH agonist protocol in women over 35 years old. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12894. [PMID: 38839827 PMCID: PMC11153521 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63842-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The decrease in assisted reproductive technology success among older women, attributed to decreased oocyte quantity and quality, poses a significant challenge. Currently, no consensus on the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for older women undergoing IVF exists. This retrospectively registered cohort study aimed to compare the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), time to live birth (TTLB), and cost-effectiveness among women older than 35 years who were receiving either the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or clomiphene citrate and gonadotropin cotreatment with ovarian stimulation (CC cotreatment) protocol. To compare treatment outcomes, we performed propensity score matching (PSM) on 2871 IVF cycles in women older than 35 years who received either the GnRHa or CC cotreatment protocol, resulting in 375 cycles in each group. Additionally, a decision tree model was utilized to assess the cost-effectiveness of the two protocols. Following PSM, both groups had similar baseline characteristics. The CC cotreatment protocol resulted in a greater rate of cycle cancellation (13.07% vs. 8.00%, p = 0.032), but the groups maintained comparable fertilization rates and embryo quality. Although the TTLB was longer in the CC cotreatment group, the CLBR per initial cycle (41.07% vs. 45.33%, p = 0.269) and delivery outcomes were similar between the two groups at the 24 months follow-up. Additionally, the average cost per live birth in the CC cotreatment group was 21.27% lower than in the GnRHa group (¥32,301.42 vs. ¥39,174.22). In conclusion, for women older than 35 years undergoing IVF, the CC cotreatment protocol offered a comparable CLBR to the GnRHa protocol but with reduced costs, indicating its potential as a viable and cost-effective ovarian stimulation option.Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , identifier [ChiCTR2300076537].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhui Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.
| | - Dan Luo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Tao Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Hui Ding
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chuang TH, Chou HH, Kuan CS, Liu SC, Kao CW, Wu YH, Lai HH, Hsieh CL, Liang YT, Chen CY, Chen SU. Dependency of mitochondrial quantity on blastocyst timeline obscures its actual effect to pregnancy outcomes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2024; 15:1415865. [PMID: 38894739 PMCID: PMC11182983 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1415865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To explore the correlation between mitochondrial quantity and the blastocyst development timeline as well as their respective contributions to early pregnancy. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using a dataset comprising 2,633 embryos that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between January 2016 and December 2023. The study was divided into three subsets to address distinct aspects: the representativeness of a single trophectoderm (TE) biopsy for mitochondrial quantity (n=43), the correlation between morphokinetic features and mitochondrial quantity (n=307), and the association analysis among mitochondrial quantity, blastocyst timeline factor, and reproductive outcomes (n=2,283). Distribution assessment of mitochondrial quantity across an individual blastocyst involved the identification within multiple biopsies and spent culture media. Timeline evaluation included correlating mitochondrial quantity with time-lapse datasets. Finally, multivariate logistic regression models, incorporating potential effectors alongside mitochondrial quantity, were employed to analyze their respective contributions to early pregnancy endpoints. Results Of distribution assessment, mitochondrial quantity exhibited an even distribution across the entire trophectoderm (Spearman's ρ=0.82), while no detectable mtDNAs in the corresponding spent culture media. Then the timeline correlation study revealed significant association between mitochondrial quantity and blastocyst features of both the day of expanded blastocyst formation (95% Confidence intervals, CIs: 0.27~4.89, p=0.03) and the timing of expanded blastocyst formation (tEB) (95% CIs: -0.24~-0.01, p=0.04) in the regression model, indicating a strong dependency between mitochondrial quantity and the blastocyst development timeline. For the contribution to early pregnancy, multivariate logistic regression models showed that the day of expanded blastocyst formation contributed to four endpoints persistently: positive for HCG (odd ratio, OR: 0.71, p=0.006), gestational sac (OR: 0.78, p=0.04), fetal heartbeat (OR: 0.71, p=0.004), and progression to 14 weeks (OR: 0.69, p=0.002). Contrastingly, no notable correlation was observed between the mitochondrial quantity and these endpoints. Conclusions Strong interaction was observed between mitochondrial quantity and the blastocyst timeline, particularly the timing of expanded blastocyst formation. It suggests that the primary determinant influencing pregnancy outcomes lies in the time-dependent parameter of blastocyst rather than in the specific mitochondrial quantity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Hsuan Chuang
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hua Chou
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Sheng Kuan
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Cheng Liu
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Wei Kao
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsin Wu
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Hsing-Hua Lai
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Lin Hsieh
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ting Liang
- Stork Fertility Center, Stork Ladies Clinic, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yu Chen
- Department of Biomechatronics Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shee-Uan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giles J, Cruz F, Garcia-Velasco JA. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2024; 36:165-172. [PMID: 38295019 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The use of progestins as pituitary suppressors has increased progressively, along with more detailed indications for their use, thereby consolidating an alternative approach to the personalization of ovarian stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS Based on the ability of progesterone to inhibit ovulation, progestins have been used in ovarian stimulation (OS) follicular protocols to prevent a luteinizing hormone surge in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), as an alternative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue administration. This review explores the different types of progestogen protocols and their efficacy depending on the type of population or reproductive procedure in which they are administered and in comparison with that of GnRH analogues. Their effect on oocytes and embryos and their safety and cost-effectiveness are also analyzed. SUMMARY Progestins have proven their effectiveness as a gonadotropin adjuvant in terms of ovarian response, reproductive outcome, and safety. In addition, they offer the convenience of oral administration and a lower cost than GnRH analogues. Whereas oocytes or embryos should be vitrified as it displaces the receptive period with the consequent asynchrony between embryo and endometrium. The evidence endorses progestins as a more friendly approach to OS, especially when frozen-thawed embryo transfer is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Giles
- IVI-RMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation - IIS La Fe. Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell, Torre, Valencia
| | - Fabio Cruz
- IVI-RMA Valencia, Plaza de la Policía Local 3, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation - IIS La Fe. Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell, Torre, Valencia
| | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- IVI-RMA Madrid, Avda del Talgo 68; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen WA, Wu CL, Ho HY, Chang F, Yang JH, Kung FT, Chen MJ, Chen MJ. Social determinants of health that impact the time to diagnosis and treatment of infertility in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2024:S0929-6646(24)00238-9. [PMID: 38710607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Taiwan is one of the countries with the lowest birth rate in the world. We investigated factors associated with the time to diagnosis and treatment of infertility in Taiwan. METHODS The study was conducted through an online questionnaire in December 2021. The questionnaire was adapted from a previously published multinational survey, and culture-specific questions were added. 91 infertile patients and 89 partners of patients in Taiwan, aged 20- to 45- year-old, were included. RESULTS The average duration before diagnosis was 2.9 years, followed by 1.5 years before treatment. Older age at marriage (p = 0.0024), higher education level (P = 0.0001), and a higher gender equality score (p = 0.0031) were associated with earlier diagnosis. Conversely, folk therapy use was linked to later diagnosis (p < 0.0001) and treatment (p < 0.0001). Notably, in the female (p = 0.039) and patient (p = 0.0377) subgroups, a higher gender equality score was associated with a shorter duration of folk therapy. Subjectively, the most frequent factor influencing treatment decision was affordability or lack thereof. The government subsidy for in vitro fertilization led to increased treatment willingness for 46.3% of respondents, and 47.3% reported more likely to pursue earlier treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the influence of education, gender equality, folk therapy, and government subsidy on fertility care decisions. To improve the timeliness of infertility healthcare in Taiwan, potential strategies include promoting education, fostering gender equality, providing financial support, and raising awareness on the association between folk therapy and delayed medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-An Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Zhongshan S. Rd., Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
| | - Chia-Ling Wu
- Department of Sociology, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City, 106, Taiwan.
| | - Hsin-Yi Ho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, No. 424, Sec. 2, Bade Rd., Taipei City, 105, Taiwan.
| | - Fan Chang
- Chang's Fertility Center, No. 566, Sec. 3, Taiwan Blvd., Taichung City, 407, Taiwan.
| | - Jehn-Hsiahn Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Zhongshan S. Rd., Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
| | - Fu-Tsai Kung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaoshiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Dapi Rd., Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan.
| | - Ming-Jer Chen
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Blvd., Taichung City, 407, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, No. 155, Sec. 2, Linong St., Taipei City, 112, Taiwan.
| | - Mei-Jou Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Zhongshan S. Rd., Taipei City, 100, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jenai Rd., Taipei City, 100, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Duc Thang L, Bao Long H, Thi Thu Trang D, Ngoc Quy P, Thi Mai Phuong G, Thi Hanh B, Trong Thach T, Thi Lien Huong N, Hoang L, Hugues JN. Non-inferiority of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol: A propensity score-weighted analysis. J Formos Med Assoc 2024; 123:523-529. [PMID: 38092654 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of the progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol in ovarian stimulation. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we included 804 patients who were treated between January 1st, 2022, and July 1st, 2023. Outcomes of ovarian stimulation were compared between the PPOS (n = 206) and GnRH-ant (n = 598). The primary outcome was the number of good cleavage embryos. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. In both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, the mean number of good cleavage embryos in PPOS (6.33) was non-inferior to GnRH-ant (6.44; unadjusted ratio of two means 1.02, 95%CI 0.92, 1.13). The trigger-day estradiol level in patients with PPOS was higher than in patients with GnRH-ant (4,420 vs 3,830 pg/ml, respectively) despite similar total follicle stimulating hormone dose and fewer days of ovarian stimulation. The number of oocytes, MII oocytes, cleavage and blastocyst embryos were comparable between the two protocols. After the first transfer of embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate were higher in the PPOS group, while the pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were not significantly different. None of the PPOS patients had an unexpected LH surge, and serum LH levels decreased slightly during ovarian stimulation. CONCLUSIONS The PPOS protocol with dydrogesterone provided similar embryo outcomes to the GnRH-ant protocol, with notable distinctions in clinical pregnancy and implantation rate. The serum LH concentration during ovarian stimulation using PPOS was well-controlled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hoang Bao Long
- Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | | | | | | | | | - Than Trong Thach
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ho Chi Minh City Medicine and Pharmacy University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | | | - Le Hoang
- Tam Anh General Hospital, Hanoi, Viet Nam
| | - Jean-Noël Hugues
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medecine, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Seine Saint-Denis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France; Université Paris 13, UFR SMBH, Bobigny, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu S, Yang D, Ma J. Comment on "Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval". J Formos Med Assoc 2024; 123:420-421. [PMID: 37604708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shangqing Wu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei, China
| | - Dongbao Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei, China.
| | - Jianxin Ma
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kao TC, Hsieh YC, Yang IJ, Wu MY, Chen MJ, Yang JH, Chen SU. Response to comment on "Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders: Risk of premature LH surge and outcome of oocyte retrieval". J Formos Med Assoc 2024; 123:422-423. [PMID: 37709572 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu-Ching Kao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Chiao Hsieh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ih-Jane Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin Branch, Yunlin County, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yih Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Jou Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Livia Shangyu Wan Chair Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jehn-Hsiahn Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shee-Uan Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang Y, Li H, Zhu S, Jiang S, Zhao W, Wang X, Tian L, Zhao G, He N, Diao H, Cao H, Zhang C. The comparison between fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate combined with letrozole in patients of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol: a propensity score-matched study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1295787. [PMID: 38155955 PMCID: PMC10754509 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1295787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the cycle characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) using fixed versus degressive doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in conjunction with letrozole (LE) in infertile women by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary-care academic medical center. Population A total of 3173 infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment within the period from January 2017 to December 2020. Methods A total of 1068 and 783 patients who underwent a fixed dose of MPA combined with LE and a degressive dose of MPA combined with LE protocols, respectively, were enrolled in this study. The freeze-all approach and later frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) were performed in both groups. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed. Main outcome measures The primary outcomes were the dosage of MPA and the incidence of premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges. The secondary outcomes were the number of oocytes retrieved, the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and the fetal malformation rate. Results We created a perfect match of 478 patients in each group. The dosage of MPA, the LH serum level on the eighth day of stimulation, progesterone (P) level and LH level on the hCG trigger day were significantly higher in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (52.1 ± 13.1 mg vs. 44.9 ± 12.5 mg; 5.0 ± 2.7 IU/L vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 IU/L; 0.9 ± 0.5 ng/ml vs. 0.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml; 3.3 ± 2.4 IU/L vs. 2.8 ± 1.9 IU/L; P < 0.01). The duration of Gn, the number of follicles with diameter more than 16 mm on trigger day, the estradiol (E2) level on the hCG trigger day were lower in the LE + fixed MPA group than in the LE + degressive MPA group (9.7 ± 1.7 days vs. 10.3 ± 1.5 days; 5.6 ± 3.0 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0; 1752.5 ± 1120.8 pg/ml vs. 1997.2 ± 1108.5 pg/ml; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of premature LH surge, the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), CLBR or fetal malformation rate between the two groups. Conclusion The combination of a degressive MPA dose with LE proved effective in reducing the total MPA dosage with comparable premature LH surge and pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing the PPOS protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Hao Li
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Shanshan Zhu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Shengfang Jiang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Wenxian Zhao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Xiaoning Wang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Liu Tian
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Guangming Zhao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- The Third Medical School, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Nongqiao He
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- The Third Medical School, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Honglu Diao
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Hong Cao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Changjun Zhang
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
- Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu S, Wang X, Zhang Y, Han Y, Zhang C. Comparison the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function. Gynecol Endocrinol 2023; 39:2217263. [PMID: 37236243 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2023.2217263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol and GnRH-a long protocol in infertility patients with normal ovarian reserve function undergoing invitro fertilization and embryo transfer. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 2013 cycles of patients with normal ovarian reserve function who underwent invitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) in the Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine from January 2018 and June 2020. The PPOS protocol group included 679 cycles and GnRH-along protocol group included 1334 cycles, the pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The duration of Gn used and total Gn used dosage in the PPOS protocol group were less than those in the GnRH-along protocol group (Duration of Gn used: 10.05 ± 1.48 vs 11.90 ± 1.85 d, p < 0.001; Total Gn used dosage: 1944.49 ± 533.61 vs 2661.34 ± 987.97 IU, p < 0.001); The LH levels were significantly higher on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol compared to GnRH-a long protocol (2.8 ± 1 ± 1.07 vs 1.01 ± 0.62 IU/L, p < 0.001), the E2 levels on HCG trigger day in PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-a long protocol group (2135.92 ± 1387.00 vs 2417.01 ± 1010.70 pg/mL, p < 0. 001). The number of oocytes retrieved in the PPOS protocol group was lower than that in the GnRH-along protocol group (8.03 ± 2.86 vs 9.47 ± 2.64, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in pregnancy outcome including clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the two group (p > 0.05); In addition, no severe OHSS occurred in the PPOS protocol group during ovulation induction, while 11 patients of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred in GnRH-a long protocol group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy of PPOS protocol combining embryo cryopreservation is comparable to that of GnRH-a long protocol in patients with normal ovarian reserve function, and the PPOS protocol is able to reduce the incidence of severe OHSS significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoyuan Xu
- Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoning Wang
- Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Yifan Han
- Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| | - Changjun Zhang
- Department of Human Reproductive Center, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- Biomedical Engineering College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kao JH. Highlights. J Formos Med Assoc 2023; 122:1-3. [PMID: 36603960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|