Effets indésirables oculaires des traitements systémiques : une mise à jour

[Ophthalmologic toxicities of novel anticancer therapies]

New anticancer strategies increasingly rely on targeted therapies, which maximize anticancer activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) mainly include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) and targeted anticancer therapies (TATs) which inhibit signal transduction pathways. These new molecules are associated with a wide range of ocular adverse events (OAEs), of varying severity: from ocular surface irritation to irreversible vision loss. ICIs can trigger autoimmune responses in all eye tissues. ADCs mainly cause ocular surface toxicity, the most specific of which being microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs). TATs cause a wide range of OAEs, depending on their class. Oncologists and ophthalmologists will be increasingly confronted to these OAEs - some of which are still poorly characterized - as the number of prescribed NTAs increases. Close collaboration between specialists is essential for their early identification and management, which helps reduce visual and quality of life consequences for these patients. This review addresses the clinical characteristics of the main OAEs linked to MATs, the description of the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and the key points of their management.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anticancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that include immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted anticancer therapies, comprising antibody drug conjugates and inhibitors of signal transduction. Some MATs are associated with ocular surface adverse events that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they are probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated ocular surface-adverse events in their practices, owing to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of ocular surface-adverse events is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life. We discuss characteristics of ocular surface pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

[Corneal perforation with tyrosine kinase inhibitor chemotherapy: REGORAFENIB]

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are active in a variety of metastatic cancers. They have a good general tolerance with mainly hepatic and dermatological side effects. Rarely, ophthalmologic side effects may occur: eyelash abnormalities, eyelids abnormalities, disorders of the ocular surface with ocular dryness or even corneal erosions that can even lead to perforation. Regorafenib is a new oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits multiple protein kinases, including those involved in tumor angiogenesis, oncogenesis and tumor microenvironment.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of complicated bilateral ulcers of corneal perforation in a patient under REGORAFENIB.

OBSERVATION

20-year-old patient with metastatic chondrosarcomas of the pelvis, mandible and thorax received chemotherapy with REGORAFENIB. A few weeks after initiation of treatment, he experienced an increased dry eye syndrome associated with bilateral corneal ulcers complicated by perforation. Despite discontinuation of chemotherapy and maximal medical and surgical treatment (iterative amniotic membrane grafts and corneal transplantation), the progression was unfavorable.

DISCUSSION

This is the first known case of corneal perforation under REGORAFENIB. The pathophysiology is multifactorial. On the one hand, this chemotherapy targets angiogenesis (VEGFR), oncogenesis (KIT, RET, RAF1, BRAF) and the tumor microenvironment (PDGFR, FGFR). On the other hand, other triggers are added, namely mixed dry eye syndrome, hypovitaminosis A (anorexia), the neurotrophic component, as well as the toxicity of chemotherapy via tears.

CONCLUSION

First described case of corneal perforation under REGORAFENIB, non-regressive at the end of chemotherapy, and despite medical and surgical treatments. Ophthalmologic surveillance is therefore necessary for patients under chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as serious ocular complications, especially corneal ones, may occur.

Prevalence and Clinical Patterns of Ocular Complications Associated With Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Anticancer Immunotherapy

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or its ligand PD-L1, are the mainstay of metastatic cancer treatment. Patients receiving these treatments may develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and describe the clinical patterns of moderate-to-severe ocular irAEs-associated with anti-PD-(L)1 treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

This study included patients recruited via (1) a single-center prospective cohort and (2) a national pharmacovigilance registry between June 2014 and March 2018, and focused on patients with moderate-to-severe ocular irAEs following anti-PD-(L)1. All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic assessment. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of moderate-to-severe ocular irAEs.

RESULTS

Of a total of 745 patients included in the prospective cohort, 3 developed moderate-to-severe ocular irAEs, providing a prevalence of 0.4% and an incidence of 0.7 per 1000 patient-months of treatment. An additional 5 cases of moderate-to-severe ocular irAEs were reported through the national registry. From these 8 patients, 5 presented with intraocular inflammation, 2 with ocular surface disease, and 1 with orbital myopathy. Five patients (62.5%) experienced additional extraophthalmologic irAEs. Ocular irAEs led to permanent discontinuation of anti-PD-(L)1 in 4 patients. Treatment by local and/or systemic corticosteroids allowed resolution or control of the ocular symptoms in 7 of 8 patients.

CONCLUSION

Although uncommon, anti-PD-(L)1-associated ocular complications may be sight-threatening and lead to discontinuation of anti-PD-(L)1 treatments. Patients complaining of eye problems while receiving ICI treatment should immediately be seen by an ophthalmologist.

In vivo Confocal Microscopy in Differentiating Ipilimumab-Induced Anterior Uveitis from Metastatic Uveal Melanoma

This report aims to describe the facilitating role of in vivo confocal microscopy in differentiating inflammatory cells from a metastatic process in a patient with uveal melanoma and multiple systemic metastases who developed anterior uveitis while under ipilimumab treatment. A 43-year-old woman developed systemic metastases 11 months after treatment of amelanotic choroidal melanoma in her right eye with 30 Gy fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. She first received temozolomide and then 4 cycles of ipilimumab 3 mg/kg/day. After the third cycle, severe anterior uveitis with coarse pigment clumps on the lens was seen in the left eye. Her left visual acuity declined from 20/20 to 20/80. Confocal microscopy revealed globular keratic precipitates with hyperreflective inclusions and endothelial blebs all suggestive of granulomatous uveitis. The uveitic reaction subsided after a 3-week course of topical corticosteroids, and her visual acuity was 20/20 again. Although uveal melanoma metastatic to the intraocular structures of the fellow eye is exceedingly rare and metastasis masquerading uveitis without any identifiable uveal lesion is even more unusual, it was still mandatory to rule out this distant possibility in our particular patient who already had widespread systemic metastases. Confocal microscopy was a useful complementary tool by identifying the inflammatory features of the keratic precipitates.