Daeschel D, Chen L, Zoellner C, Snyder AB. A simulation model to quantify the efficacy of dry cleaning interventions on a contaminated milk powder line.
Appl Environ Microbiol 2025:e0208624. [PMID:
40243318 DOI:
10.1128/aem.02086-24]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2025] [Indexed: 04/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Outbreaks of Salmonella in low moisture foods have been caused by cross-contamination from the processing environment into product. We used Monte Carlo simulations to model the impact of hypothetical cross-contamination scenarios of Salmonella from production equipment into milk powder. Model outputs included the quantity and extent of the contaminated product from a production line. Outputs were used to compare the efficacy of cleaning interventions. Cross-contamination of potential dry cleaning surrogates was also modeled. Input parameters for the model included log reductions from wiping an inoculated surface with a dry towel and transfer coefficients from an inoculated surface to milk powder. After a 2-log CFU contamination breach (Salmonella introduced to an 8.4 cm2 stainless-steel surface on the processing line before production), the number of consumer-sized milk powder units (300 g) contaminated with Salmonella was 72 [24, 96] (median [p5, p95] across 1,000 simulation iterations). The average concentration of Salmonella within contaminated units was -2.33-log CFU/g [-2.46, -1.86]. Wiping the contaminated surface with a dry towel before the production of milk powder reduced the number of contaminated units to 26 [12, 64]. Flushing the contaminated surface with 150 kg of milk powder prior to milk powder production reduced the number of contaminated units to 0 [0, 41]. Flushing with 300 kg of milk powder further reduced the number of contaminated milk powder units to 0 [0, 16]. Enterococcus faecium resulted in a similar number of contaminated units (74 [44, 93]) compared with Salmonella (72 [24, 96]) after a 2-log CFU contamination breach.
IMPORTANCE
This work demonstrates the utility of modeling as a decision support tool to (i) estimate Salmonella cross-contamination into product under different scenarios, (ii) compare different cleaning interventions, and (iii) help inform the selection of a Salmonella surrogate for cleaning validation studies. Risk models can describe the tradeoffs associated with different dry cleaning strategies in low moisture food environments. For example, the model presented in this study can estimate the differences in product contamination as a consequence of flushing a processing line with increasing quantities of material. Additionally, outputs from this model can be used to evaluate the risk of cross-contamination from a contaminated dry cleaning tool. Finally, comparing outputs from a simulation model is an alternative method for comparing Salmonella surrogates used in dry cleaning validation. Simulation model outputs (i.e., prevalence and concentration of contaminated units) may be more broadly interpretable than comparing transfer coefficients alone, enhancing decision support.
Collapse